1
|
Peipins LA, Dasari S, Viox MH, Rodriguez JL. Information needs persist after genetic counseling and testing for BRCA1/2 and Lynch Syndrome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-024-07377-9. [PMID: 39046629 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07377-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Research has shown that cancer genetic risk is often not well understood by patients undergoing genetic testing and counseling. We describe the barriers to understanding genetic risk and the needs of high-risk persons and cancer survivors who have undergone genetic testing. METHODS Using data from an internet survey of adults living in the USA who responded 'yes' to having ever had a genetic test to determine cancer risk (N = 696), we conducted bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate associations between demographic, clinical, and communication-related variables by our key outcome of having vs. not having enough information about genetics and cancer to speak with family. Percentages for yes and no responses to queries about unmet informational needs were calculated. Patient satisfaction with counseling and percentage disclosure of genetic risk status to family were also calculated. RESULTS We found that a lack of resources provided by provider to inform family members and a lack of materials provided along with genetic test results were strongly associated with not having enough information about genetics and cancer (OR 4.54 95% CI 2.40-8.59 and OR 2.19 95% CI 1.16-4.14 respectively). Among participants undergoing genetic counseling, almost half reported needing more information on what genetic risk means for them and their family and how genetic testing results might impact future screening. CONCLUSION High levels of satisfaction with genetic counseling may not give a full picture of the patient-provider interaction and may miss potential unmet needs of the patient. Accessible resources and ongoing opportunities for updating family history information could reinforce knowledge about genetic risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy A Peipins
- Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, NCCDPHP/DCPC, 4770 Buford Hwy., NE, Mailstop S107-4, Chamblee, GA, USA.
| | | | | | - Juan L Rodriguez
- Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Blakeslee SB, Gunn CM, Parker PA, Fagerlin A, Battaglia T, Bevers TB, Bandos H, McCaskill-Stevens W, Kennedy JW, Holmberg C. Talking numbers: how women and providers use risk scores during and after risk counseling - a qualitative investigation from the NRG Oncology/NSABP DMP-1 study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073138. [PMID: 37984961 PMCID: PMC10660821 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Little research exists on how risk scores are used in counselling. We examined (a) how Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT) scores are presented during counselling; (b) how women react and (c) discuss them afterwards. DESIGN Consultations were video-recorded and participants were interviewed after the consultation as part of the NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Decision-Making Project 1 (NSABP DMP-1). SETTING Two NSABP DMP-1 breast cancer care centres in the USA: one large comprehensive cancer centre serving a high-risk population and an academic safety-net medical centre in an urban setting. PARTICIPANTS Thirty women evaluated for breast cancer risk and their counselling providers were included. METHODS Participants who were identified as at increased risk of breast cancer were recruited to participate in qualitative study with a video-recorded consultation and subsequent semi-structured interview that included giving feedback and input after viewing their own consultation. Consultation videos were summarised jointly and inductively as a team.tThe interview material was searched deductively for text segments that contained the inductively derived themes related to risk assessment. Subgroup analysis according to demographic variables such as age and Gail score were conducted, investigating reactions to risk scores and contrasting and comparing them with the pertinent video analysis data. From this, four descriptive categories of reactions to risk scores emerged. The descriptive categories were clearly defined after 19 interviews; all 30 interviews fit principally into one of the four descriptive categories. RESULTS Risk scores were individualised and given meaning by providers through: (a) presenting thresholds, (b) making comparisons and (c) emphasising or minimising the calculated risk. The risk score information elicited little reaction from participants during consultations, though some added to, agreed with or qualified the provider's information. During interviews, participants reacted to the numbers in four primary ways: (a) engaging easily with numbers; (b) expressing greater anxiety after discussing the risk score; (c) accepting the risk score and (d) not talking about the risk score. CONCLUSIONS Our study highlights the necessity that patients' experiences must be understood and put into relation to risk assessment information to become a meaningful treatment decision-making tool, for instance by categorising patients' information engagement into types. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01399359.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah B Blakeslee
- Research Group: Prevention, Integrative Medicine and Health Promotion in Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Oncology and Hematology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine M Gunn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth College, Hanover and Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Patricia A Parker
- Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Angela Fagerlin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Tracy Battaglia
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Evans Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Therese B Bevers
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hanna Bandos
- NRG Oncology SDMC, and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Worta McCaskill-Stevens
- Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Research Group, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, UK
| | - Jennifer W Kennedy
- Institute of Public Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Holmberg
- Institute of Public Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Riddle L, Joseph G, Caruncho M, Koenig BA, James JE. The role of polygenic risk scores in breast cancer risk perception and decision-making. J Community Genet 2023; 14:489-501. [PMID: 37311883 PMCID: PMC10576692 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-023-00655-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have the potential to improve the accuracy of clinical risk assessments, yet questions about their clinical validity and readiness for clinical implementation persist. Understanding how individuals integrate and act on the information provided by PRS is critical for their effective integration into routine clinical care, yet few studies have examined how individuals respond to the receipt of polygenic risk information. We conducted an embedded Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) study to examine if and how unaffected participants in a US population breast cancer screening trial understood and utilized PRS, as part of a multifactorial risk score combining traditional risk factors with a genetic risk assessment, to make screening and risk-reduction decisions. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 24 trial participants who were designated at elevated risk for breast cancer due to their combined risk score. Interviews were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Participants understood PRS conceptually and accepted it as one of many risk factors to consider, yet the value and meaning they ascribed to this risk estimate varied. Most participants reported financial and insurance barriers to enhanced screening with MRI and were not interested in taking risk-reducing medications. These findings contribute to our understanding of how PRS may be best translated from research to clinical care. Furthermore, they illuminate ethical concerns about identifying risk and making recommendations based on polygenic risk in a population screening context where many may have trouble accessing appropriate care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Riddle
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mikaella Caruncho
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Barbara Ann Koenig
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Elyse James
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McWilliams L, Ruane H, Ulph F, Woof VG, Harrison F, Evans DG, French DP. What do women think about having received their breast cancer risk as part of a risk-stratified NHS Breast Screening Programme? A qualitative study. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:356-365. [PMID: 37225893 PMCID: PMC10206350 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02268-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-stratified screening is being considered for national breast screening programmes. It is unclear how women experience risk-stratified screening and receipt of breast cancer risk information in real time. This study aimed to explore the psychological impact of undergoing risk-stratified screening within England's NHS Breast Screening Programme. METHODS Individual telephone interviews were conducted with 40 women who participated in the BC-Predict study and received a letter indicating their estimated breast cancer risk as one of four risk categories: low (<2% 10-year risk), average (2-4.99%), above average (moderate; 5-7.99%) or high (≥8%). Audio-recorded interview transcriptions were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS Two themes were produced: 'From risk expectations to what's my future health story?' highlights that women overall valued the opportunity to receive risk estimates; however, when these were discordant with perceived risk, this causes temporary distress or rejection of the information. 'Being a good (woman) citizen' where women felt positive contributing to society but may feel judged if they then cannot exert agency over the management of their risk or access follow-up support CONCLUSIONS: Risk-stratified breast screening was generally accepted without causing long-lasting distress; however, issues related to risk communication and access to care pathways need to be considered for implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna McWilliams
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, MAHSC, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK.
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England.
| | - Helen Ruane
- Nightingale & Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT), Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, M23 9LT, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Ulph
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, MAHSC, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK
| | - Victoria G Woof
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, MAHSC, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK
| | | | - D Gareth Evans
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
- Nightingale & Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT), Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, M23 9LT, Manchester, UK
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, England
- Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4GJ, England
| | - David P French
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, MAHSC, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
- Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4GJ, England
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Harzheim L, Lorke M, Rostamzadeh A, Jessen F, Woopen C, Jünger S. The Promotion of Health Literacy. GEROPSYCH 2023. [DOI: 10.1024/1662-9647/a000310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
Abstract: Progress in predictive medicine has increased the challenges to navigating complex risk information for patients and healthcare professionals. This contribution investigates how people facing the risk of developing Alzheimer’s dementia perceive risk, what aspects are relevant to their health literacy, and how to promote individual health literacy in predictive medicine. We conducted a qualitative study analyzing narrative interviews, body maps, and sociodemographic data from persons who had undergone early predictive procedures in a memory clinic. We understand the promotion of health literacy as an ethical task in predictive medicine and argue for (1) emphasizing personal resources to promote subjective health literacy, (2) reframing communication and decision-making about disease risk, and (3) teaching skills for value-sensitive, individualized risk communication.
Collapse
|
6
|
Woof VG, Howell A, McWilliams L, Gareth Evans D, French DP. How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:1916-1924. [PMID: 36002751 PMCID: PMC9681857 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01944-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
This review aimed to synthesise qualitative research on how women notified that they are at increased risk of breast cancer view their risk. Five electronic databases were systematically reviewed for qualitative research investigating how women who have received an increased breast cancer risk estimate appraise their risk status. Fourteen records reporting 12 studies were included and critically appraised. Data were thematically synthesised. Four analytical themes were generated. Women appraise their risk of breast cancer through comparison with their risk of other familial diseases. Clinically derived risk estimates were understood in relation to pre-conceived risk appraisals, with incongruences met with surprise. Family history is relied upon strongly, with women exploring similarities and differences in attributes between themselves and affected relatives to gauge the likelihood of diagnosis. Women at increased risk reported living under a cloud of inevitability or uncertainty regarding diagnosis, resulting in concerns about risk management. Women hold stable appraisals of their breast cancer risk which appear to be mainly formed through their experiences of breast cancer in the family. Healthcare professionals should explore women's personal risk appraisals prior to providing clinically derived risk estimates in order to address misconceptions, reduce concerns about inevitability and increase perceived control over risk reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria G. Woof
- grid.5379.80000000121662407University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- grid.5379.80000000121662407University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK ,grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9QZ UK
| | - Lorna McWilliams
- grid.5379.80000000121662407University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- grid.5379.80000000121662407University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK ,grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9QZ UK
| | - David P. French
- grid.5379.80000000121662407University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lu SV, Leung BMY, Bruton AM, Millington E, Alexander E, Camden K, Hatsu I, Johnstone JM, Arnold LE. Parents' priorities and preferences for treatment of children with ADHD: Qualitative inquiry in the MADDY study. Child Care Health Dev 2022; 48:852-861. [PMID: 35244227 DOI: 10.1111/cch.12995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parents' lived experiences of having a child with ADHD may shape their decision making regarding ADHD treatment options for their child. The aim of this study was to explore parents' experiences of living with a child with ADHD in the family and how their experiences influence their perspectives on treatment preferences and priorities. METHODS A phenomenological qualitative design was used. Semistructured interviews were conducted with parents of children with ADHD who were enrolled in a multisite randomized controlled trial. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and transcripts at each site were double coded. Initial codes were derived directly from the text. Qualitative data were analysed with an inductive approach. RESULTS Twenty-three parents were interviewed: eight from Alberta, Canada; eight from Portland, Oregon, USA; and seven from Columbus, Ohio, USA. Among the parents, 69% were married, 86% completed college education and 52% reported household income over $80,000. Among the children, the mean age was 9.6 years (SD = 1.8 years), 78% were boys and 48% were never medicated for their ADHD. Two major themes emerged from the analysis. Theme 1 was 'impact of ADHD on families within and outside the home' with the following subthemes: 'reconfiguring the home life', 'trial-and-error of accommodations at school' and 'responding to social pressures to fit in'. Theme 2 was 'enabling appropriate and accessible treatments for families' with the following subthemes: 'finding the "right fit" with professionals and treatments' and 'factors influencing inequitable access to treatments'. CONCLUSIONS Parents described shared experiences and identified similar barriers, preferences and priorities for ADHD treatments regardless of demographic differences by site. Families desired access to family-centred, multimodal approaches to ADHD treatment. Further research is needed to identify the specific structural changes to healthcare, services and policies that will better support this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy V Lu
- Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Brenda M Y Leung
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| | - Alisha M Bruton
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Elizabeth Millington
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| | - E Alexander
- Department of Human Sciences, College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kelsey Camden
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Irene Hatsu
- Department of Human Sciences, College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jeanette M Johnstone
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - L Eugene Arnold
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Increased interaction and procedural flexibility favoured participation: Study across European cohorts of preterm born individuals. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 143:169-177. [PMID: 34965477 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand participation and attrition phenomena variability in European cohorts of individuals born preterm through in-depth exploration of the interplay of situational elements involved. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Multi-situated qualitative design, using focus groups, semi-structured interviews and collaborative visual methodology with a purposive sample of adults born preterm, parents and professionals (N=124) from eight cohorts in seven European countries. RESULTS Most cohort participants were motivated by altruism/solidarity and gratitude/sense of duty to reciprocate (only absent in adults aged 19-21), followed by expectation of direct benefit to one's health and knowledge amongst participating adults. Common deterrents were perceived failure in reciprocity as in insufficient/inadequate interaction and information sharing, and postal questionnaires. Combining multipurpose, flexible strategies for contact and assessment, reminders, face-to-face and shorter periodicity and not simply adding retention strategies or financial incentives favoured participation. Professionals' main challenges entailed resources, funding and, European societal changes related to communication and geopolitical environment. CONCLUSION Retention would benefit from tailoring inclusive strategies throughout the cohorts' life cycle and consistent promotion of reciprocal altruistic research goals. Investing in regular interaction, flexibility in procedures, participant involvement and return of results can help mitigate attrition as well as considering mothers as main facilitators to participating children and impaired adults.
Collapse
|
9
|
Weil AM, Wolfe CR. Individual differences in risk perception and misperception of COVID-19 in the context of political ideology. APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 2021; 36:19-31. [PMID: 34898844 PMCID: PMC8652668 DOI: 10.1002/acp.3894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The COVID‐19 pandemic has been characterized by misinformation, politicization of public health, and extreme differences in risk assessment. In two studies, we sought to understand factors that contribute to differences in people's understanding of the virus and associated risks. We found that conservative participants reported higher levels of acceptable risk, have lower risk estimates of activities, and endorsed more misinformation. Participants with personal health risk factors rated COVID‐19 risks as higher, more reflective participants had lower acceptable risk levels, and impulsive participants endorsed more misinformation. In our second study, we also found that reflective participants were more likely to wear a mask, get vaccinated, and maintain social distancing, and that participants judged arguments about COVID‐19 measures largely based on the claim rather than supporting reasons. By clarifying these individual differences, public health experts can more effectively create targeted interventions for at risk populations, and be better prepared for future outbreaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey M Weil
- Psychology Department Washington College Chestertown Maryland USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lorke M, Harzheim L, Rhiem K, Woopen C, Jünger S. The ticking time-bomb. Health literacy in the context of genetic risk prediction in familial breast-ovarian cancer; A qualitative study. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN MEDICINE & HEALTHCARE 2021. [DOI: 10.4081/qrmh.2021.9647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Personalised methods of predicting breast and ovarian cancer risk through genetic testing increasingly demand a person’s understanding and critical appraisal of risk-related information, as well as decision-making and acting upon disclosure of a positive test result. The current study aims at understanding health literacy (HL) among persons at risk of developing familial breast-ovarian cancer (FBOC) from a bottom-up perspective—incorporating their viewpoints into the research process. Its qualitative design integrates an ethnographic-narrative approach and findings from 10 narrative interviews with women who have undergone genetic testing, analysed by using reflexive grounded theory. The collected data reveal the entanglement of the women’s perceptions concerning the risk of getting ill, their identity, and their strategies of managing health. The analysis of this interplay provides an empirical basis for approaching HL in its communicative dimension, considering individuals’ understandings of health and illness, and emphasizing the role of critical HL.
Collapse
|
11
|
Marques SCS, Doetsch J, Abate G, Brødsgaard A, Colombo G, Cuttini M, Pedersen P, Barros H. Understanding participation in European cohort studies of preterm children: the views of parents, healthcare professionals and researchers. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21:19. [PMID: 33430773 PMCID: PMC7802270 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01206-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retention of participants in cohort studies is a major challenge. A better understanding of all elements involved in participation and attrition phenomena in particular settings is needed to develop effective retention strategies. The study aimed to achieve an in-depth understanding of participant retention in longitudinal cohorts focusing on participants' and researcher's perspectives, across three diverse socio-geographic and cultural settings. METHODS This study used a triangulation of multi-situated methods to collect data on cohort studies of children born with less than 32 weeks of gestation in Denmark, Italy and Portugal. It included focus groups and individual semi-driven interviewing with involved key actors (i.e. parents, staff, healthcare professionals, researchers) and a collaborative visual methodology. A purposive sample of 48 key actors (n = 13 in Denmark; n = 13 in Italy; n = 22 in Portugal) was collected. A triangulation of phenomenological thematic analysis with discourse analysis was applied. Cross-contextual and context-specific situational elements involved in participation and attrition phenomena in these child cohorts were identified at various levels and stages. RESULTS Main findings included: situational challenges affecting potential and range of possibilities for implementation strategies (geopolitical environment, societal changes, research funding models); situational elements related to particular strategies acting as deterrents (postal questionnaires) and facilitators (multiple flexible strategies, reminders, regular interaction); main motivations to enrol and participate (altruism/solidarity and gratitude/sense of duty to reciprocate); main motivational deterrents to participate to follow-up waves (lack of bonding, insufficient feedback); entanglement of clinical and research follow-up as facilitator and deterrent. CONCLUSIONS The multi-situated approach used, addressing the interplay of the lived experience of individuals, was of most value to understand participation variability under different implemented strategies in-context. Cross-contextual and context-specific situational elements that have been influential factors towards participation and attrition in the cohorts were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra C S Marques
- EPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas 135, 4050-091, Porto, Portugal.,Centro em Rede de Investigação em Antropologia, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Julia Doetsch
- EPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas 135, 4050-091, Porto, Portugal
| | - Georgia Abate
- Clinical Care and Management Innovation Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Anne Brødsgaard
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Public Health, HEALTH, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Grazia Colombo
- Clinical Care and Management Innovation Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marina Cuttini
- Clinical Care and Management Innovation Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Pernille Pedersen
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Henrique Barros
- EPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas 135, 4050-091, Porto, Portugal.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wernli KJ, Bowles EA, Knerr S, Leppig KA, Ehrlich K, Gao H, Schwartz MD, O’Neill SC. Characteristics Associated with Participation in ENGAGED 2 - A Web-based Breast Cancer Risk Communication and Decision Support Trial. Perm J 2020; 24:1-4. [PMID: 33482952 PMCID: PMC7849258 DOI: 10.7812/tpp/19.205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated demographic and clinical characteristics associated with participation in a clinical trial testing the efficacy of an online tool to support breast cancer risk communication and decision support for risk mitigation to determine the generalizability of trial results. METHODS Eligible women were members of Kaiser Permanente Washington aged 40-69 years with a recent normal screening mammogram, heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts and a calculated risk of > 1.67% based on the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium 5-year breast cancer risk model. Trial outcomes were chemoprevention and breast magnetic resonance imaging by 12-months post-baseline. Women were recruited via mail with phone follow-up using plain language materials notifying them of their density status and higher than average breast cancer risk. Multivariable logistic regression calculated independent odds ratios (ORs) for associations between demographic and clinical characteristics with trial participation. RESULTS Of 2,569 eligible women contacted, 995 (38.7%) participated. Women with some college (OR = 1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-2.96) or college degree (OR = 3.35, 95% CI 2.29-4.90) were more likely to participate than high school-educated women. Race/ethnicity also was associated with participation (African-American OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.87; Asian OR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.41). Multivariate adjusted ORs for family history of breast/ovarian cancer were not associated with trial participation. DISCUSSION Use of plain language and potential access to a website providing personal breast cancer risk information and education were insufficient in achieving representative participation in a breast cancer prevention trial. Additional methods of targeting and tailoring, potentially facilitated by clinical and community outreach, are needed to facilitate equitable engagement for all women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen J Wernli
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Erin A Bowles
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Kelly Ehrlich
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Hongyuan Gao
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Marc D Schwartz
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Suzanne C O’Neill
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Waters EA, Taber JM, McQueen A, Housten AJ, Studts JL, Scherer LD. Translating Cancer Risk Prediction Models into Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment Tools: Stumbling Blocks and Strategies for Success. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:2389-2394. [PMID: 33046450 PMCID: PMC8170537 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer risk prediction models such as those published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention are a cornerstone of precision medicine and public health efforts to improve population health outcomes by tailoring preventive strategies and therapeutic treatments to the people who are most likely to benefit. However, there are several barriers to the effective translation, dissemination, and implementation of cancer risk prediction models into clinical and public health practice. In this commentary, we discuss two broad categories of barriers. Specifically, we assert that the successful use of risk-stratified cancer prevention and treatment strategies is particularly unlikely if risk prediction models are translated into risk assessment tools that (i) are difficult for the public to understand or (ii) are not structured in a way to engender the public's confidence that the results are accurate. We explain what aspects of a risk assessment tool's design and content may impede understanding and acceptance by the public. We also describe strategies for translating a cancer risk prediction model into a cancer risk assessment tool that is accessible, meaningful, and useful for the public and in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika A Waters
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
| | | | - Amy McQueen
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Jamie L Studts
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, Colorado
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gómez-Ramírez O, Thomson K, Salway T, Haag D, Falasinnu T, Grennan T, Grace D, Gilbert M. "Mini Dial-A-Nurses" and "Good Brands": What Are the Desirable Features of Online HIV/STI Risk Calculators? AIDS EDUCATION AND PREVENTION : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR AIDS EDUCATION 2020; 32:528-542. [PMID: 33779209 DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2020.32.6.528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
A wide variety of risk calculators estimate individuals' risk for HIV/sexually transmitted infections (STI) online. These tools can help target HIV/STI screening and optimize clinical decision-making. Yet, little evidence exists on suitable features for these tools to be acceptable to end-users. We investigated the desirable characteristics of risk calculators among STI clinic clients and testing service providers. Participants interacted with online HIV/STI risk calculators featuring varied target audiences, completion lengths, and message outputs. Thematic analysis of focus groups identified six qualities that would make risk calculators more appealing for online client use: providing personalized risk assessments based on users' specific sexual behaviors and HIV/STI-related concerns; incorporating nuanced risk assessment and tailored educational information; supplying quantifiable risk estimates; using non-stigmatizing and inclusive framing; including explanations and next steps; and developing effective and appropriate branding. Incorporating these features in the design of online HIV/STI risk calculators may improve their acceptability among end-users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oralia Gómez-Ramírez
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Kim Thomson
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Travis Salway
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Devon Haag
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Troy Grennan
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Mark Gilbert
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wegier P, Varenbut J, Bernstein M, Lawlor PG, Isenberg SR. "No thanks, I don't want to see snakes again": a qualitative study of pain management versus preservation of cognition in palliative care patients. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19:182. [PMID: 33250047 PMCID: PMC7702681 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-00683-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Towards the end of life, use of opioid analgesics becomes more common in patients to control pain and improve quality of life. While pain medication may help manage pain, unwanted cognitive side effects are frequently noted. This balancing act presents a trade-off for patients between pain relief and adverse effects, where the desire to relieve pain must be evaluated against the desire to maintain cognitive clarity and may represent a difficult decision for patients receiving palliative care. Our goal was to understand how patients' decision making about pain medications balances the pain relief from those medications against the cognitive decline often associated with them. METHODS We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with patients receiving home-based palliative care from a program in Toronto, Canada. Interview recordings were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Thirty-one interviews were conducted. Some patients preferred cognitive preservation over pain management because of a sense that cognition is central to their identity, the desire to maintain lucidity, a desire to continue participating in work or hobbies, and fear of addiction. Conversely, some patients preferred pain management over cognitive preservation because of a desire to avoid suffering, an inability to sleep without medications, or an acceptance of some cognitive compromise. A few patients attempted to find balance through tapering drugs, limiting their use of breakthrough analgesic doses, or using alternative strategies. CONCLUSIONS Decision making around pain and pain management is a highly preference-sensitive process-with no clear right or wrong decisions, only the preferences of each patient. The findings from this study may influence the design of future patient-facing decision aids around pain management. Future studies should pilot interventions to better assist patients with this decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pete Wegier
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. .,Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. .,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Jaymie Varenbut
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Bernstein
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter G Lawlor
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarina R Isenberg
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Samimi G, Heckman-Stoddard BM, Holmberg C, Tennant B, Sheppard BB, Coa KI, Kay SS, Ford LG, Szabo E, Minasian LM. Cancer Prevention in Primary Care: Perception of Importance, Recognition of Risk Factors and Prescribing Behaviors. Am J Med 2020; 133:723-732. [PMID: 31862335 PMCID: PMC7293933 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Revised: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Acceptability and uptake of cancer preventive interventions is associated with physician recommendation, which is dependent on physician familiarity with available preventive options. The goal of this study is to evaluate cancer prevention perceptions, understanding of breast and ovarian cancer risk factors, and prescribing behaviors of primary care physicians. METHODS We conducted cross-sectional. Web-based survey of 750 primary care physicians (250 each for obstetrics/gynecology, internal medicine, and family medicine) in the United States. Survey respondents were recruited from an opt-in health care provider panel. RESULTS Perception of importance and the practice of recommending general and cancer-specific preventive screenings and interventions significantly differed by provider type. These perceptions and behaviors reflected the demographics of the population that the primary care physicians see within their respective practices. The majority of respondents recognized genetic/hereditary risk factors for breast or ovarian cancer, while epidemiologic or clinical risk factors were less frequently recognized. Prescribing behaviors were related to familiarity with the interventions, with physicians indicating that they more frequently reinforced a specialist's recommendation rather than prescribed a preventive intervention. CONCLUSIONS Cancer prevention perceptions, recognition of cancer risk factors, and prescribing behaviors differ among practice types and were related to familiarity with preventive options. Cancer prevention education and risk assessment resources should be more widely available to primary care physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goli Samimi
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
| | | | - Christine Holmberg
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Havel, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Leslie G Ford
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Eva Szabo
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Lori M Minasian
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kandagatla P, Rizk NN, Dokic D, Kochkodan J, Estevez S, Yanik M, Goranta S, Huber‐Keener K, Jeruss JS. Patient and provider factors associated with the noninitiation of tamoxifen for young women at high‐risk for the development of breast cancer. Breast J 2020; 26:464-468. [PMID: 31538708 PMCID: PMC10167625 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
We sought to identify factors associated with disparities in tamoxifen utilization among young patients at high-risk for developing breast cancer. We identified 67 premenopausal, high-risk women age 35-45, without surgical prophylaxis, who did not initiate tamoxifen. Factors associated with noninitiation were examined. About 37% of patients had no documented provider-based discussion regarding initiation. Type of high-risk diagnosis was the only factor associated with a provider-based discussion (P = .03). For patients offered tamoxifen, primary reasons for noninitiation were perceived minimal benefit (66.7%), fertility concerns (16.7%), and concerns about side effects (7.1%). Implementation of comprehensive educational strategies regarding the benefits of tamoxifen should be facilitated to improve initiation among young high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pridvi Kandagatla
- Surgery University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
- Surgery Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan
| | | | | | | | | | - Megan Yanik
- University of Michigan School of Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan
| | - Sowmya Goranta
- Internal Medicine Michigan State University Flint Michigan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gunn CM, Bokhour B, Parker VA, Parker PA, Blakeslee S, Bandos H, Holmberg C. Exploring Explanatory Models of Risk in Breast Cancer Risk Counseling Discussions: NSABP/NRG Oncology Decision-Making Project 1. Cancer Nurs 2020; 42:3-11. [PMID: 28661894 PMCID: PMC5745305 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Explanatory models represent patient understanding of etiology, pathophysiology, illness, symptoms, and treatments, but little attention has been paid to how they are used by patients "at risk" for future disease. OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to elucidate what constitutes an explanatory model of risk and to describe explanatory models of risk related to developing breast cancer. METHODS Thirty qualitative interviews with women identified as at an increased risk for breast cancer were conducted. Interviews were coded to identify domains of explanatory models of risk using a priori codes derived from the explanatory model of illness framework. Within each domain, a grounded thematic analysis described participants' explanatory models related to breast cancer risk. RESULTS The domains of treatment and etiology remained similar in a risk context compared with illness, whereas course of illness, symptoms, and pathophysiology differed. We identified a new, integrative concept relative to other domains within explanatory models of risk: social comparisons, which was dominant in risk perhaps due to the lack of physical experiences associated with being "at risk." CONCLUSIONS Developing inclusive understandings of risk and its treatment is key to developing a framework for the care of high-risk patients that is both evidence based and sensitive to patient preferences. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The concept of "social comparisons" can assist healthcare providers in understanding women's decision making under conditions of risk. Ensuring that healthcare providers understand patient perceptions of risk is important because it relates to patient decision making, particularly due to an increasing focus on risk assessment in cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine M Gunn
- Author Affiliations: Women's Health Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine (Dr Gunn); Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health (Drs Gunn, Bokhour, and V.A. Parker), Massachusetts; Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Dr P.A. Parker); NRG Oncology, and The University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Bandos); and Institute of Public Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (Dr Holmberg and Ms Blakeslee)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Farkas A, Vanderberg R, Merriam S, DiNardo D. Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: A Practical Guide for the Primary Care Provider. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2019; 29:46-56. [PMID: 31560601 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Several organizations, including the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and the United States Preventive Services Task Force, recommend incorporation of breast cancer risk-based counseling and chemoprevention into routine well-woman care. However, primary care providers report both discomfort with and a lack of medical knowledge on this topic. In this review we present a practical, evidence-based guide for incorporating breast cancer risk assessment and chemoprevention into routine care. We advocate a stepwise approach consisting of: (1) risk assessment and communication, (2) selection of appropriate chemoprevention based on risk-benefit analysis, (3) shared decision-making regarding chemoprevention, and (4) management of chemoprevention side effects. We encourage providers to identify high-risk women and refer them to genetic counseling or a high-risk breast cancer clinic. For women who are not considered high risk, we suggest using the Gail model to estimate a woman's 5-year risk of invasive breast cancer. Usually, the benefits of chemoprevention outweigh the risks of chemoprevention once a woman's 5-year risk of invasive breast cancer reaches 3%. For these women there are several factors that need to be considered when selecting a chemoprevention agent, including patient preference, thrombotic history, menopausal status, absence or presence of a uterus, and bone mineral density. We advocate an evidence-based shared decision-making approach that reflects the woman's individual preferences when communicating risk and counseling about chemoprevention. After starting a chemoprevention agent, close follow-up is important as side effects of chemoprevention are common, including vasomotor symptoms and arthralgias. We also review evidence-based management of chemoprevention side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Farkas
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.,Department of Medicine, Clement Zablocki Milwaukee VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Rachel Vanderberg
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sarah Merriam
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Pittsburgh VA Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Deborah DiNardo
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Pittsburgh VA Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gunn CM, Bokhour BG, Parker VA, Battaglia TA, Parker PA, Fagerlin A, McCaskill-Stevens W, Bandos H, Blakeslee SB, Holmberg C. Understanding Decision Making about Breast Cancer Prevention in Action: The Intersection of Perceived Risk, Perceived Control, and Social Context: NRG Oncology/NSABP DMP-1. Med Decis Making 2019; 39:217-227. [PMID: 30803311 PMCID: PMC6538065 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x19827258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Literature on decision making about breast cancer prevention focuses on individual perceptions and attitudes that predict chemoprevention use, rather than the process by which women decide whether to take risk-reducing medications. This secondary analysis aimed to understand how women's perceptions of breast cancer risk and locus of control influence their decision making. METHODS Women were accrued as part of the NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Decision-Making Project 1, a study aimed at understanding contributors to chemoprevention uptake. Thirty women participated in qualitative in-depth interviews after being counseled about chemoprevention. Deductive codes grouped women based on dimensions of risk perception and locus of control. We used a constant comparative method to make connections among inductive themes focused on decision making, deductive codes for perceived risk and perceived locus of control, and the influence of explanatory models within and across participants. RESULTS Participants were predominantly non-Hispanic white (63%), with an average age of 50.9 years. Decision making varied across groups: the high-perceived risk/high-perceived control group used "social evidence" to model the behaviors of others. High-perceived risk/low-perceived control women made decisions based on beliefs about treatment, rooted in the experiences of social contacts. The low-perceived risk/low-perceived control group interpreted signs of risk as part of the normal continuum of bodily changes in comparison to others. Low-perceived risk/high-perceived control women focused on maintaining a current healthy trajectory. CONCLUSION "Social evidence" plays an important role in the decision-making process that is distinct from emotional aspects. Attending to patients' perceptions of risk and control in conjunction with social context is key to caring for patients at high risk in a way that is evidence based and sensitive to patient preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine M. Gunn
- Boston University School of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Women’s Health Unit, Boston, MA
- Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston, MA
| | - Barbara G. Bokhour
- Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston, MA
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA
| | - Victoria A. Parker
- Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston, MA
- University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH
| | - Tracy A. Battaglia
- Boston University School of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Women’s Health Unit, Boston, MA
| | - Patricia A. Parker
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, New York, NY
| | - Angela Fagerlin
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Salt Lake City
- Salt Lake City VA Informatics Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS 2.0) Center for Innovation, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Worta McCaskill-Stevens
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA
- Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Research Group, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Hanna Bandos
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA
- The University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Sarah B. Blakeslee
- Institute of Public Health, Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Brandenburg, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Holmberg
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA
- Institute of Public Health, Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Brandenburg, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Havel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Qi XY, Liu H, Bi DD, Wang XT, Guo YF, Hao T, Zhang BX, Wang XG, Han MH. Combined administration on You-Gui Yin and low-dose Raloxifene partially attenuates the bone loss in ovariectomized mice through the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells. PHYTOMEDICINE : INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOTHERAPY AND PHYTOPHARMACOLOGY 2019; 53:286-293. [PMID: 30668409 DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Revised: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 09/03/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease of fragility fractures due to the loss of mass and deterioration of the microarchitecture of bone. PURPOSE The aim of the study was to assess the osteogenic effects and the underlying mechanisms of the combined administration of You-Gui Yin (YGY) and Raloxifene hydrochloride (RLX) in ovariectomized (OVX) mice. METHODS First, a classic animal model was used to mimic postmenopausal osteoporosis through the removal of the ovary of mice. Second, the OVX mice were administered YGY, RLX, and YGY + RLX for 12 weeks. Next, the bone microtomographic histomorphometry and bone mineral density (BMD) were assessed by micro-CT, and the biochemical markers of procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and beta-isomerized C-telopeptide (β-CTX) in serum were assessed. Finally, primary bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) were isolated from the tibia and cultured to evaluate cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. RESULTS The results showed that BMD on the YGY + RLX group was higher than that on the RLX group (p < 0.05) and did not have a significant difference when compared with the sham group. Notably, the YGY + RLX group had a dramatically increased trabecular number (Tb.N) compared with that of the YGY group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the BV/TV (bone volume/total volume) and Tb.N in the YGY + RLX group were higher than that in the RLX group (p < 0.05), and the Tb.Sp (trabecular separation) was lower than that in the RLX group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the serum level of P1NP from the YGY + RLX group dramatically increased when compared with that from the YGY and RLX groups (YGY group: p < 0.05; RLX groups: p < 0.01). Notably, there was no significant difference between the YGY and YGY + RLX groups. In addition, cell proliferation from the co-administration of YGY and RLX was clearly higher than a single use of YGY and RLX (p < 0.01, respectively). The ALP/BCA (alkaline phosphatase/bicinchoninic acid) in the YGY + RLX group was higher than that in the RLX group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Overall, co-administered YGY and RLX could partially attenuate bone loss and were more effective than individually using either one; this outcome might be associated with the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Yu Qi
- Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Resources Utilization of Chinese Herbal Medicine, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Room 109, Chemistry Building, 151 Malianwa North Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China; College of Pharmacy, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150040, China
| | - Hao Liu
- The Core Laboratory, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Dong-Dong Bi
- Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Resources Utilization of Chinese Herbal Medicine, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Room 109, Chemistry Building, 151 Malianwa North Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Xiang-Tao Wang
- Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Resources Utilization of Chinese Herbal Medicine, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Room 109, Chemistry Building, 151 Malianwa North Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Yi-Fei Guo
- Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Resources Utilization of Chinese Herbal Medicine, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Room 109, Chemistry Building, 151 Malianwa North Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Ting Hao
- Department of Trauma, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, 1 Cultural Palace Street, Huimin District, Hohhot 010030, China
| | - Bao-Xin Zhang
- Department of Trauma, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, 1 Cultural Palace Street, Huimin District, Hohhot 010030, China
| | - Xing-Guo Wang
- Department of Trauma, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, 1 Cultural Palace Street, Huimin District, Hohhot 010030, China.
| | - Mei-Hua Han
- Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Resources Utilization of Chinese Herbal Medicine, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Room 109, Chemistry Building, 151 Malianwa North Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pilot study of decision support tools on breast cancer chemoprevention for high-risk women and healthcare providers in the primary care setting. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018; 18:134. [PMID: 30558581 PMCID: PMC6296071 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0716-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer chemoprevention can reduce breast cancer incidence in high-risk women; however, chemoprevention is underutilized in the primary care setting. We conducted a pilot study of decision support tools among high-risk women and their primary care providers (PCPs). Methods The intervention included a decision aid (DA) for high-risk women, RealRisks, and a provider-centered tool, Breast Cancer Risk Navigation (BNAV). Patients completed validated surveys at baseline, after RealRisks and after their PCP clinical encounter or at 6-months. Referral for high-risk consultation and chemoprevention uptake were assessed via the electronic health record. The primary endpoint was accuracy of breast cancer risk perception at 6-months. Results Among 40 evaluable high-risk women, median age was 64.5 years and median 5-year breast cancer risk was 2.19%. After exposure to RealRisks, patients demonstrated an improvement in accurate breast cancer risk perceptions (p = 0.02), an increase in chemoprevention knowledge (p < 0.01), and 24% expressed interest in taking chemoprevention. Three women had a high-risk referral, and no one initiated chemoprevention. Decisional conflict significantly increased from after exposure to RealRisks to after their clinical encounter or at 6-months (p < 0.01). Accurate breast cancer risk perceptions improved and was sustained at 6-months or after clinical encounters. We discuss the side effect profile of chemoprevention and the care pathway when RealRisks was introduced to understand why patients experienced increased decision conflict. Conclusion Future interventions should carefully link the use of a DA more proximally to the clinical encounter, investigate timed measurements of decision conflict and improve risk communication, shared decision making, and chemoprevention education for PCPs. Additional work remains to better understand the impact of decision aids targeting both patients and providers. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02954900 November 4, 2016 Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
|
23
|
Herrmann A, Hall A, Proietto A. Using the Health Belief Model to explore why women decide for or against the removal of their ovaries to reduce their risk of developing cancer. BMC Womens Health 2018; 18:184. [PMID: 30428865 PMCID: PMC6236993 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-018-0673-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 10/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women at an increased risk of ovarian cancer often have to decide for or against the surgical removal of their healthy ovaries to reduce their cancer risk. This decision can be extremely difficult. Despite this, there is a lack of guidance on how to best support women in making this decision. Research that is guided by theoretical frameworks is needed to help inform clinical practice. We explored the decision-making process of women who are at an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer and had to decide for or against the removal of their ovaries. METHODS A qualitative study of 18 semi-structured interviews with women who have attended a cancer treatment centre or cancer counselling and information service in New South Wales, Australia. Data collection and analysis were informed by the Health Belief Model (HBM). Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The paper describes women's decision making with the help of the four constructs of the HBM: perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, and perceived barriers. The more anxious and susceptible women felt about getting ovarian cancer, the more likely they were to have an oophorectomy. Women's anxiety was often fuelled by witnessing family members suffer or die from cancer. Women considered a number of barriers and potential benefits to having the surgery but based their decision on "gut feeling" and experiential factors, rather than statistical risk assessment. Age, menopausal status and family commitments seemed to influence but not determine women's decisions on oophorectomy. Women reported a lack of decision support and appreciated if their doctor explained their treatment choice, provided personalised information, involved their general practitioner in the decision-making process and offered a second consultation to follow-up on any questions women might have. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that deciding on whether to have an oophorectomy is a highly personal decision which can be described with the help of the HBM. The results also highlight the need for tailored decision support which could help improve doctor-patient-communication and patient-centred care related to risk reducing surgery in women at an increased risk of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Herrmann
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308 Australia
| | - Alix Hall
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308 Australia
| | - Anthony Proietto
- Cancer Services and Cancer Network, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rainey L, van der Waal D, Wengström Y, Jervaeus A, Broeders MJ. Women's perceptions of the adoption of personalised risk-based breast cancer screening and primary prevention: a systematic review. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1275-1283. [PMID: 29882455 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1481291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Increased knowledge of breast cancer risk factors may enable a paradigm shift from the current age-based mammographic screening programmes to a personalised risk-based approach. This would warrant a significant change in practice, yet the acceptability from a woman's perspective has never been systematically explored. In this systematic review, we inventoried and appraised studies of women's perceptions of risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention to identify factors associated with adopting this new paradigm. METHODS We searched Medline, Embase and PsycInfo to identify original articles in English containing perceptions of risk-based breast cancer screening and/or primary prevention of women with an average to above average risk of developing breast cancer. Qualitative data were systematically extracted and referenced against four theoretical models of preventative health behaviour adoption. RESULTS When considering the adoption of this novel screening and prevention programme, women carefully review their perceived susceptibility to breast cancer. Their decisions are based on a cost-benefit analysis of adopting lifestyle changes, chemoprevention, or prophylactic surgery, taking into account their perceived competence, individual autonomy, relatedness to others, and personal preference. The role of intent is limited when considering behavioural change. CONCLUSIONS Implementing risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention will require a multifactorial approach. The transition from theory to practice can be supported by developing evidence-based shared decision aids and family-oriented (genetic) counselling programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Rainey
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle van der Waal
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Wengström
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
- Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Anna Jervaeus
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Mireille J.M. Broeders
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Petrillo LA, McMahan RD, Tang V, Dohan D, Sudore RL. Older Adult and Surrogate Perspectives on Serious, Difficult, and Important Medical Decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 66:1515-1523. [PMID: 29972594 PMCID: PMC6167167 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Revised: 03/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To elicit decisions that diverse older adults and surrogates perceive as serious, difficult, or important and explore what helped them make those decisions. DESIGN Focus groups (N=13) in which participants were asked to recall serious, difficult, or important medical decisions and what helped them make those decisions. SETTING Clinics, support groups and senior centers. PARTICIPANTS Diverse English- and Spanish-speaking older adults (age: mean 78, range 64-89) and surrogates (age: mean 57, range 33-76) (29% African American, 26% white, 26% Asian or Pacific Islander, 19% Hispanic) (N=69). MEASUREMENTS We used thematic analysis to analyze transcripts. RESULTS We identified 168 decisions. Older adults from all racial and ethnic groups frequently recalled cancer treatment decisions and decisions about chronic illness management. Surrogates described decisions about transitions in care and medical crises. Older adults valued self-sufficiency and maximizing survival and relied on personal experiences as often as medical advice. In all racial and ethnic groups, surrogates valued avoiding suffering for loved ones. CONCLUSION Diverse older adults and surrogates perceive life-threatening illness and day-to-day decisions about chronic disease to be serious, difficult, and important. The surrogates' goal of avoiding suffering of older adults may differ from older adults' priorities of self-sufficiency and maximizing survival. Clinicians should support older adults and surrogates in identifying important and difficult decisions and learn about the values and information sources they bring to decision-making. With this knowledge, clinicians can customize decision support and achieve person-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Petrillo
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ryan D McMahan
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Victoria Tang
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Daniel Dohan
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
- Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Rebecca L Sudore
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rayo MF, Pawar C, Sanders EBN, Liston BW, Patterson ES. PARTICIPATORY BULLSEYE TOOLKIT INTERVIEW: IDENTIFYING PHYSICIANS' RELATIVE PRIORITIZATION OF DECISION FACTORS WHEN ORDERING RADIOLOGIC IMAGING IN A HOSPITAL SETTING. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN HEALTHCARE. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN HEALTHCARE 2018; 7:1-7. [PMID: 30035146 PMCID: PMC6054591 DOI: 10.1177/2327857918071001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Critical Decision Method (CDM), a popular cognitive task analysis (CTA) method, is an in-depth retrospective interview that uses a historical non-routine incident to identify experts' decision-making factors in complex socio-technical settings with high consequences for failure. However, it is challenging to use CDM to make comparisons, including those between experts and trainees. We describe an alternative CTA method used to study physicians' decision making for ordering diagnostic imaging. After being primed with 11 simulated patient scenarios, nine attending and 11 resident physicians were asked to map out and present their decision-making process with a bullseye participatory design toolkit. Interviews were analyzed qualitatively, revealing four common decision factors: diagnostic efficacy, patient safety, organizational constraints, and patient comfort. The bullseye maps were used to quantitatively measure priority differences between these decision factors. Attending and resident physicians both prioritized diagnostic efficacy over the other factors (2.38 vs. 3.71, p <.01, and 2.59 vs. 3.52, p<.01, respectively), but attending physicians' decisions had a higher proportion of non-diagnostic items (65% vs. 50%, p = .008). Our results demonstrate the usefulness of this method in eliciting decision factors for a complex, face-valid task and for identifying differences due to levels of expertise and training.
Collapse
|
27
|
Rainey L, van der Waal D, Donnelly LS, Evans DG, Wengström Y, Broeders M. Women's decision-making regarding risk-stratified breast cancer screening and prevention from the perspective of international healthcare professionals. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0197772. [PMID: 29856760 PMCID: PMC5983562 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Increased knowledge of breast cancer risk factors may enable a paradigm shift from one-size-fits-all breast cancer screening to screening and subsequent prevention guided by a woman’s individual risk of breast cancer. Professionals will play a key role in informing women about this new personalised screening and prevention programme. Therefore, it is essential to explore professionals’ views of the acceptability of this new programme, since this may affect shared decision-making. Methods Professionals from three European countries (the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Sweden) participated in digital concept mapping, a systematic mixed methods approach used to explore complex multidimensional constructs. Results Across the three countries, professionals prioritised the following five themes which may impact decision-making from the perspective of eligible women: (1) Anxiety/worry; (2) Proactive approach; (3) Reassurance; (4) Lack of knowledge; and (5) Organisation of risk assessment and feedback. Furthermore, Dutch and British professionals expressed concerns regarding the acceptability of a heterogeneous screening policy, suggesting women will question their risk feedback and assigned pathway of care. Swedish professionals emphasised the potential impact of the programme on family relations. Conclusions The perspectives of Dutch, British, and Swedish professionals of women’s decision-making regarding personalised breast cancer screening and prevention generally appear in line with women’s own views of acceptability as previously reported. This will facilitate shared decision-making. However, concerns regarding potential consequences of this new programme for screening outcomes and organisation need to be addressed, since this may affect how professionals communicate the programme to eligible women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Rainey
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Daniëlle van der Waal
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Louise S. Donnelly
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Withington, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Yvonne Wengström
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet & Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Mireille Broeders
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Blakeslee SB, McCaskill-Stevens W, Parker PA, Gunn CM, Bandos H, Bevers TB, Battaglia TA, Fagerlin A, Müller-Nordhorn J, Holmberg C. Deciding on breast cancer risk reduction: The role of counseling in individual decision-making - A qualitative study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2017; 100:2346-2354. [PMID: 28734560 PMCID: PMC5683919 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2017] [Revised: 06/13/2017] [Accepted: 06/25/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The presentation of risks and benefits in clinical practice is common particularly in situations in which treatment recommendations involve trade-offs. The treatment of breast cancer risk with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) is such a decision. We investigated the influence of health care provider (HCP) counseling on women's decision-making. METHODS Thirty breast cancer risk counseling sessions were recorded from April 2012-August 2013 at a comprehensive cancer center and at a safety-net, community hospital in the US. Participating women and HCPs were interviewed. A cross-case synthesis was used for analysis. RESULTS Of 30 participants 21 received a SERM-recommendation, 11 decided to take SERMs. Counseling impacted decision-making, but did not determine it. Three categories emerged: 1.) ability to change the decision anytime, 2.) perceptions on medications, and 3.) proximity of cancer. CONCLUSION Decision-making under conditions of a risk diagnosis such as increased breast cancer risk is a continuous process in which risk information is transformed into practical and experiential considerations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Individuals' health care decision-making is only marginally dependent on the interactions in the clinic. Accepting patients' experiences and beliefs in their own right and letting them guide the discussion may be important for a satisfying decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah B Blakeslee
- Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Public Health.
| | - Worta McCaskill-Stevens
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.
| | - Patricia A Parker
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler Street, P.O. Box 301439, Unit Number: 1322, Houston, TX 77230-1439, United States.
| | - Christine M Gunn
- Evans Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Hanna Bandos
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, United States; The University of Pittsburgh, 201 North Craig St., Suite 350, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
| | - Therese B Bevers
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler Street, P.O. Box 301439, Unit Number: 1322, Houston, TX 77230-1439, United States.
| | - Tracy A Battaglia
- Evans Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA 02118, United States.
| | - Angela Fagerlin
- Salt Lake City VA Center for Informatics Decision Enhancement and Surveillance (IDEAS); Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah.
| | - Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn
- Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Public Health.
| | - Christine Holmberg
- Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Public Health.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Ovarian carcinoma is the most lethal malignancy of the female genital tract. Population-based trials in the general population have not demonstrated that screening improves early detection or survival. Therefore, application of prevention strategies is vital to improving outcomes from this disease. Surgical prevention reduces risk and prophylactic risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is the most effective means to prevent ovarian carcinoma in the high-risk patient although the risks do not outweigh the benefits in average risk patients. Other surgical and medical options have unknown or limited efficacy in the high-risk patient. In this review, we define the patient at high risk for ovarian cancer, discuss how to identify these women and weigh their available ovarian cancer prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M. Temkin
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Jennifer Bergstrom
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Goli Samimi
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lori Minasian
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Giesler JM, Keller B, Repke T, Leonhart R, Weis J, Muckelbauer R, Rieckmann N, Müller-Nordhorn J, Lucius-Hoene G, Holmberg C. Effect of a Website That Presents Patients' Experiences on Self-Efficacy and Patient Competence of Colorectal Cancer Patients: Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e334. [PMID: 29030329 PMCID: PMC5660297 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2017] [Revised: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 07/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients often seek other patients’ experiences with the disease. The Internet provides a wide range of opportunities to share and learn about other people’s health and illness experiences via blogs or patient-initiated online discussion groups. There also exists a range of medical information devices that include experiential patient information. However, there are serious concerns about the use of such experiential information because narratives of others may be powerful and pervasive tools that may hinder informed decision making. The international research network DIPEx (Database of Individual Patients’ Experiences) aims to provide scientifically based online information on people’s experiences with health and illness to fulfill patients’ needs for experiential information, while ensuring that the presented information includes a wide variety of possible experiences. Objective The aim is to evaluate the colorectal cancer module of the German DIPEx website krankheitserfahrungen.de with regard to self-efficacy for coping with cancer and patient competence. Methods In 2015, a Web-based randomized controlled trial was conducted using a two-group between-subjects design and repeated measures. The study sample consisted of individuals who had been diagnosed with colorectal cancer within the past 3 years or who had metastasis or recurrent disease. Outcome measures included self-efficacy for coping with cancer and patient competence. Participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group that had immediate access to the colorectal cancer module for 2 weeks or to a waiting list control group. Outcome criteria were measured at baseline before randomization and at 2 weeks and 6 weeks Results The study randomized 212 persons. On average, participants were 54 (SD 11.1) years old, 58.8% (124/211) were female, and 73.6% (156/212) had read or heard stories of other patients online before entering the study, thus excluding any influence of the colorectal cancer module on krankheitserfahrungen.de. No intervention effects were found at 2 and 6 weeks after baseline. Conclusions The results of this study do not support the hypothesis that the website studied may increase self-efficacy for coping with cancer or patient competencies such as self-regulation or managing emotional distress. Possible explanations may involve characteristics of the website itself, its use by participants, or methodological reasons. Future studies aimed at evaluating potential effects of websites providing patient experiences on the basis of methodological principles such as those of DIPEx might profit from extending the range of outcome measures, from including additional measures of website usage behavior and users’ motivation, and from expanding concepts, such as patient competency to include items that more directly reflect patients’ perceived effects of using such a website. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02157454; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02157454 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6syrvwXxi)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jürgen M Giesler
- Section of Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Research, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Bettina Keller
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tim Repke
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Hasso-Plattner-Institute, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Rainer Leonhart
- Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Joachim Weis
- Clinic for Oncological Rehabilitation, UKF Reha, Department of Psycho-Oncology, University Clinic Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rebecca Muckelbauer
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nina Rieckmann
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Christine Holmberg
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Holmberg C, Bandos H, Fagerlin A, Bevers TB, Battaglia TA, Wickerham DL, McCaskill-Stevens WJ. NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Decision-Making Project-1 Results: Decision Making in Breast Cancer Risk Reduction. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2017; 10:625-634. [PMID: 28978566 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-17-0076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2017] [Revised: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 08/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) reduce breast cancer risk. Adoption of SERMs as prevention medication remains low. This is the first study to quantify social, cultural, and psychologic factors driving decision making regarding SERM use in women counseled on breast cancer prevention options. A survey study was conducted with women counseled by a health care provider (HCP) about SERMs. A statistical comparison of responses was performed between those who decided to use and those who decided not to use SERMs. Independent factors associated with the decision were determined using logistic regression. Of 1,023 participants, 726 made a decision: 324 (44.6%) decided to take a SERM and 402 (55.4%) decided not to. The most important factor for deciding on SERM use was the HCP recommendation. Other characteristics associated with the decision included attitudes and perceptions regarding medication intake, breast cancer worry, trust in HCP, family members with blood clots, and others' experiences with SERMs. The odds of SERM intake when HCP recommended were higher for participants with a positive attitude toward taking medications than for those with a negative attitude (Pinteraction = 0.01). This study highlights the importance of social and cultural aspects for SERM decision making, most importantly personal beliefs and experiences. HCPs' recommendations play a statistically significant role in decision making and are more likely to be followed if in line with patients' attitudes. Results indicate the need for developing interventions for HCPs that not only focus on the presentation of medical information but, equally as important, on addressing patients' beliefs and experiences. Cancer Prev Res; 10(11); 625-34. ©2017 AACRSee related editorial by Crew, p. 609.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Holmberg
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Hanna Bandos
- NRG Oncology, and The University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Angela Fagerlin
- The University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Population Health and The VA Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, Utah.,University of Michigan and The VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Therese B Bevers
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tracy A Battaglia
- Women's Health Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - D Lawrence Wickerham
- NRG Oncology and The Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Worta J McCaskill-Stevens
- Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Research Group, Breast Cancer Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention, NCI, Rockville, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Izadi S, Pachur T, Wheeler C, McGuire J, Waters EA. Spontaneous mental associations with the words "side effect": Implications for informed and shared decision making. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2017; 100:1928-1933. [PMID: 28583721 PMCID: PMC5573624 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2017] [Revised: 04/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/21/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To gain insight into patients' medical decisions by exploring the content of laypeople's spontaneous mental associations with the term "side effect." METHODS An online cross-sectional survey asked 144 women aged 40-74, "What are the first three things you think of when you hear the words 'side effect?"' Data were analyzed using content analysis, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS 17 codes emerged and were grouped into 4 themes and a Miscellaneous category: Health Problems (70.8% of participants), Decision-Relevant Evaluations (52.8%), Negative Affect (30.6%), Practical Considerations (18.1%) and Miscellaneous (9.7%). The 4 most frequently identified codes were: Risk (36.1%), Health Problems-Specific Symptoms (35.4%), Health Problems-General Terms (32.6%), and Negative Affect-Strong (19.4%). Code and theme frequencies were generally similar across demographic groups (ps>0.05). CONCLUSION The term "side effect" spontaneously elicited comments related to identifying health problems and expressing negative emotions. This might explain why the mere possibility of side effects triggers negative affect for people making medical decisions. Some respondents also mentioned decision-relevant evaluations and practical considerations in response to side effects. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Addressing commonly-held associations and acknowledging negative affects provoked by side effects are first steps healthcare providers can take towards improving informed and shared patient decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonya Izadi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | - Thorsten Pachur
- Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
| | - Courtney Wheeler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | - Jaclyn McGuire
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | - Erika A Waters
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Trivedi MS, Coe AM, Vanegas A, Kukafka R, Crew KD. Chemoprevention Uptake among Women with Atypical Hyperplasia and Lobular and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2017; 10:434-441. [PMID: 28611039 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-17-0100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2017] [Revised: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Women with atypical hyperplasia and lobular or ductal carcinoma in situ (LCIS/DCIS) are at increased risk of developing invasive breast cancer. Chemoprevention with selective estrogen receptor modulators or aromatase inhibitors can reduce breast cancer risk; however, uptake is estimated to be less than 15% in these populations. We sought to determine which factors are associated with chemoprevention uptake in a population of women with atypical hyperplasia, LCIS, and DCIS. Women diagnosed with atypical hyperplasia/LCIS/DCIS between 2007 and 2015 without a history of invasive breast cancer were identified (N = 1,719). A subset of women (n = 73) completed questionnaires on breast cancer and chemoprevention knowledge, risk perception, and behavioral intentions. Descriptive statistics were generated and univariate and multivariable log-binomial regression were used to estimate the association between sociodemographic and clinical factors and chemoprevention uptake. In our sample, 29.3% had atypical hyperplasia, 23.3% had LCIS, and 47.4% had DCIS; 29.4% used chemoprevention. Compared with women with atypical hyperplasia, LCIS [RR, 1.43; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.16-1.76] and DCIS (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.28-1.86) were significantly associated with chemoprevention uptake, as was medical oncology referral (RR, 5.79; 95% CI, 4.80-6.98). Younger women were less likely to take chemoprevention (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.87), and there was a trend toward increased uptake in Hispanic compared with non-Hispanic white women. The survey data revealed a strong interest in learning about chemoprevention, but there were misperceptions in personal breast cancer risk and side effects of chemoprevention. Improving communication about breast cancer risk and chemoprevention may allow clinicians to facilitate informed decision-making about preventative therapy. Cancer Prev Res; 10(8); 434-41. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghna S Trivedi
- Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York. .,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Austin M Coe
- Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
| | - Alejandro Vanegas
- Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rita Kukafka
- Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.,Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
| | - Katherine D Crew
- Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Haward MF, Gaucher N, Payot A, Robson K, Janvier A. Personalized Decision Making: Practical Recommendations for Antenatal Counseling for Fragile Neonates. Clin Perinatol 2017; 44:429-445. [PMID: 28477670 DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2017.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Emphasis has been placed on engaging parents in processes of shared decision making for delivery room management decisions of critically ill neonates whose outcomes are uncertain and unpredictable. The goal of antenatal consultation should rather be to adapt to parental needs and empower them through a personalized decision-making process. This can be done by acknowledging individuality and diversity while respecting the best interests of neonates. The goal is for parents to feel like they have agency and ability and are good parents, before birth, at birth, and after, either in the NICU or until the death of their child.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlyse F Haward
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Montefiore, New York, NY 10467, USA
| | - Nathalie Gaucher
- Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1J4, Canada; Clinical Ethics Unit, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec H3T-1C5, Canada
| | - Antoine Payot
- Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1J4, Canada; Clinical Ethics Unit, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec H3T-1C5, Canada; Palliative Care Unit, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec H3T-1C5, Canada; Unité d'Éthique Clinique et de Partenariat Famille, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec H3T-1C5, Canada
| | - Kate Robson
- Canadian Premature Babies Foundation, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Annie Janvier
- Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1J4, Canada; Clinical Ethics Unit, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec H3T-1C5, Canada; Palliative Care Unit, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec H3T-1C5, Canada; Unité d'Éthique Clinique et de Partenariat Famille, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec H3T-1C5, Canada; Department of Pediatrics and Clinical Ethics, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, 3175 Chemin Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1C5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Worry and risk perception of breast cancer in a prevention trial of low dose tamoxifen in midlife postmenopausal hormone users. Breast 2017; 34:108-114. [PMID: 28570956 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2017] [Revised: 04/28/2017] [Accepted: 05/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is increasing interest in combining postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) and SERMs in midlife women. We previously showed that refusal to participate in a prevention trial of low dose tamoxifen in HT users was associated with higher worry about breast cancer. Given this counterintuitive finding, we studied which factors influenced worry and risk perception of breast cancer. METHODS We assessed the relationships of breast cancer worry and risk perception with age, age at menopause, Gail risk, education, adherence to mammographic screening, BMI, smoking, physical activity, alcohol use, anxiety and depression in 457 midlife HT users who were eligible to participate in the trial. RESULTS Women with menopause <48 years were more worried about breast cancer than women with menopause >52 years (OR = 5.0, 95% CI, 1.2-21.1). Worry was also associated with high absolute risk perception and former smoking. Factors associated with higher risk perception were age>60 years, at-risk life style, worry about breast cancer and depression. CONCLUSIONS The inverse association between early menopause and worry about breast cancer is in contrast with the known protective effect of early menopause on breast cancer risk and seems to reflect a feeling of aging and disease vulnerability. Our findings indicate that worry about cancer has an affective construct which is independent of breast cancer biology but is engaged in health decision making. Increasing breast cancer risk awareness in subjects high in worry without a plan of emotional coping may therefore be counterproductive because of avoidant attitudes.
Collapse
|
36
|
Fowler SL, Klein WMP, Ball L, McGuire J, Colditz GA, Waters EA. Using an Internet-Based Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool to Improve Social-Cognitive Precursors of Physical Activity. Med Decis Making 2017; 37:657-669. [PMID: 28363033 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x17699835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internet-based cancer risk assessment tools might serve as a strategy for translating epidemiological risk prediction research into public health practice. Understanding how such tools affect key social-cognitive precursors of behavior change is crucial for leveraging their potential into effective interventions. PURPOSE To test the effects of a publicly available, Internet-based, breast cancer risk assessment tool on social-cognitive precursors of physical activity. METHODS Women (N = 132) aged 40-78 with no personal cancer history indicated their perceived risk of breast cancer and were randomly assigned to receive personalized ( www.yourdiseaserisk.wustl.edu ) or nonpersonalized breast cancer risk information. Immediately thereafter, breast cancer risk perceptions and physical activity-related behavioral intentions, self-efficacy, and response efficacy were assessed. RESULTS Personalized information elicited higher intentions, self-efficacy, and response efficacy than nonpersonalized information, P values < 0.05. Self-efficacy and response efficacy mediated the effect of personalizing information on intentions. Women who received personalized information corrected their inaccurate risk perceptions to some extent, P values < 0.05, but few fully accepted the information. CONCLUSION Internet-based risk assessment tools can produce beneficial effects on important social-cognitive precursors of behavior change, but lingering skepticism, possibly due to defensive processing, needs to be addressed before the effects can be maximized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Linda Ball
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO (LB, JM, GAC, EAW)
| | - Jaclyn McGuire
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO (LB, JM, GAC, EAW)
| | - Graham A Colditz
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO (LB, JM, GAC, EAW)
| | - Erika A Waters
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO (LB, JM, GAC, EAW)
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Benedict C, Thom B, Teplinsky E, Carleton J, Kelvin JF. Family-building After Breast Cancer: Considering the Effect on Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy. Clin Breast Cancer 2016; 17:165-170. [PMID: 28087390 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2016] [Revised: 12/02/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Adherence to endocrine therapy (ET) is a longstanding problem in breast cancer (BC) survivorship care, particularly among younger women. Younger patients have reported lower ET initiation rates and greater rates of early discontinuation and are considered an "at risk" group for nonadherence. For women who hope to have children in the future, concerns about premature menopause and the implications of postponing childbearing for the 5 to 10 years of ET are widespread. Preliminary evidence suggests that prioritizing fertility, along with concerns about side effects, leads to ET noninitiation and early discontinuation. Clinical efforts to improve adherence might need to consider patients' family-building goals during the course of treatment and to appropriately counsel patients according to their priorities and family-building intentions. Educational materials about family building after cancer are still not consistently available or provided. Helping patients to access trusted informational resources and decision support tools, in conjunction with medical counseling, will promote informed decisions regarding ET adherence and pregnancy that are medically appropriate. Such shared patient-provider decision-making about ET adherence and pregnancy could help to maximize patient autonomy by incorporating their values, preferences, and priorities into decisions, using providers' medical expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Benedict
- Department of Medicine, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY.
| | - Bridgette Thom
- Survivorship Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Eleonora Teplinsky
- Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Monter Cancer Center, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Jane Carleton
- Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Monter Cancer Center, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Joanne F Kelvin
- Survivorship Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nobile H, Bergmann MM, Moldenhauer J, Borry P. Participants' Accounts on Their Decision to Join a Cohort Study With an Attached Biobank: A Qualitative Content Analysis Study Within Two German Studies. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2016; 11:237-49. [PMID: 27381010 DOI: 10.1177/1556264616657463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Reliable participation and sustained retention rates are crucial in longitudinal studies involving human subjects and biomaterials. Understanding the decision to enroll is an essential step to develop adequate strategies promoting long-term participation. Semi-structured interviews were implemented with newly recruited and long-term participants randomly drawn from two ongoing longitudinal studies with a biobank component in Germany. Iterative qualitative content analysis was applied to the transcribed interviews. Participants (n = 31) expressed their decision to enroll or remain in the study as the result of the complex interplay of individual factors, institutional cues, study-related features, and societal dynamics. Different forms of trust were identified as central within the elements used to explain participation and could be compared to Dibben, Morris, and Lean's dynamic model of interpersonal trust. Given these high levels of trust, an investigation of the morality of the trustful relationship at stake between participants and research(ers) is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène Nobile
- German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Nuthetal, Germany Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Manuela M Bergmann
- German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Nuthetal, Germany
| | | | - Pascal Borry
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hum S, Wu M, Pruthi S, Heisey R. Physician and Patient Barriers to Breast Cancer Preventive Therapy. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2016; 8:158-164. [PMID: 27617055 PMCID: PMC4995234 DOI: 10.1007/s12609-016-0216-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The uptake of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for the primary prevention of breast cancer is low, despite their proven efficacy in several randomized clinical trials. This review summarizes the latest data on physicians' and women's barriers to breast cancer preventive therapy. Physicians' challenges include: identifying suitable candidates for preventive therapy, inadequate training and confidence in risk assessment and counselling, insufficient knowledge of risk-reducing medications, and lack of time. High-risk women fear medication side effects, and they often weigh experiences of others more heavily than statistical probabilities to guide their decision-making. Despite decision aid interventions to help women make an informed decision, acceptance of preventive therapy will remain low until: risk/benefit profiles are more favorable, physicians are better educated and skilled in having these discussions, and suitable biomarkers to monitor drug efficacy and better clinical risk prediction models to assess true individual risk are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Hum
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, Women’s College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2 Canada
| | - Melinda Wu
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Women’s College Hospital, Princess Margaret Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2 Canada
| | - Sandhya Pruthi
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Ruth Heisey
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Women’s College Hospital, Princess Margaret Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2 Canada
| |
Collapse
|