1
|
Khosravi M, Azar G, Izadi R. Principles and elements of patient-centredness in mental health services: a thematic analysis of a systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open Qual 2024; 13:e002719. [PMID: 38960446 PMCID: PMC11227821 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mental health disorders, particularly depression and anxiety, are widespread globally and necessitate effective solutions. The patient-centred approach has been identified as a viable and effective method for addressing these challenges. This paper synthesised the principles of patient-centred mental health services and provides a comprehensive review of the existing literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a qualitative content analysis study conducted in a systematic review framework in 2022. PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest and Cochrane databases were systematically searched, and by screening the titles, abstracts, and the texts of studies related to the purpose of the research, the data were extracted. Evaluation of the quality of the studies was done using the CASP checklist for qualitative studies. After selecting the final studies based on the entry and exit criteria, subsequently, a thematic analysis of findings was conducted on the data obtained from the systematic review. RESULTS The database search produced 6649 references. After screening, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality scores indicated the studies were of high level of quality with acceptable risk of bias. The thematic analysis identified six major principles of patient-centredness in mental health services: education, involvement and cooperation, access, effectiveness and safety, health and well-being, and ethics. CONCLUSIONS Patient-centredness is a complex approach in mental health services. The principles and elements of patient-centredness foster positive patient outcomes, enhance healthcare quality and ensure compassionate and effective care. Upholding these principles is crucial for delivering patient-centred, ethical and effective mental health services. Furthermore, the study found that patient education can boost adherence and satisfaction, and decrease unnecessary hospitalisations. Patient involvement in decision-making is influenced by their age and the relationship with their psychologists. And, effective leadership and resource management can enhance clinical processes and patient-centredness in mental health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohsen Khosravi
- Department of Healthcare Management, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Ghazaleh Azar
- Department of Consultation and Mental Health, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
| | - Reyhane Izadi
- Department of Healthcare Management, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abu-Odah H, Chan EA, Molassiotis A. Factors Impacting on Patient-Centered Communication Skills and Their Opportunities to Be Involved in Decision-making From the Perspective of Patients With Cancer, Informal Caregivers, and/or Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review. Cancer Nurs 2024:00002820-990000000-00246. [PMID: 38652461 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active participation of cancer patients and their caregivers in decision-making, along with high-quality communication, is crucial in patient-centered cancer management. Although numerous factors affecting patients' communication and decision-making involvement have been identified, it is still unclear which ones are the most prevalent and critical. OBJECTIVE To identify factors that contribute to high-quality patient-centered communication and decision-making participation from the perspectives of cancer patients, informal caregivers, and/or healthcare professionals. METHODS A systematic review was conducted, using 9 databases to retrieve primary research articles published from 2010 to February 17, 2023, updated on December 13, 2023. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (version 18). The socioecological model of communication was utilized as analytical framework for summarizing the results. RESULTS Fifty-two studies were included. The most frequently reported factors were predominantly articulated at the individual, interpersonal, and societal levels. Although the patients' lack of knowledge and limited language proficiency were the frequent patient-level barriers, the perceived lack of knowledge and lack of training of professionals were the crucial and current professional-level barriers, as reported in studies published in 2016 onward. To circumvent these factors, it is critical to enhance professionals' knowledge, communication skills, and patient relationships. CONCLUSIONS Recognizing barriers and facilitators could help in the development of strategies to overcome these barriers and enhance patient participation in clinical communication. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE The findings could guide the development of programs to enhance patient-professional communication skills. Further cross-cultural studies are needed to understand culture's impact on communication effectiveness and decision-making participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hammoda Abu-Odah
- Author Affiliations: School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR (Dr Abu-Odah and Prof. Chan); and College of Arts, Humanities and Education, University of Derby, Derby, UK (Prof. Molassiotis)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Geddis-Regan A, Wassall RR, Abley C, Exley C. Exploring dental treatment decision-making experiences of people living with dementia and family carers. Gerodontology 2024; 41:83-93. [PMID: 37036039 DOI: 10.1111/ger.12687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People living with dementia can have complex dental care needs. Dentists and patients should make treatment decisions together, yet some people living with dementia may be unable to make their own decisions about their dental care. Dental treatment decision-making and patients' experiences of this process have not been comprehensively researched. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore the dental treatment decision-making perspectives and experiences of people living with dementia and their family members. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 8 people living with dementia and 17 family caregivers. A constructivist grounded theory approach was adopted, using a maximum variation sample. Qualitative data collection and analysis occurred concurrently. Data underwent initial open coding followed by more focused coding, supported by reflexive memo writing, which supported data categorisation. RESULTS People living with dementia reported wanting to be understood as unique individuals with specific needs. All participants described wanting to be actively involved in dental treatment decisions. However, many felt that they were insufficiently involved in treatment decision-making. This perceived underinvolvement meant that some people living with dementia and family members felt the treatment outcomes they sought were neither discussed nor considered. CONCLUSION People living with dementia and carers had specific expectations of dental care yet felt passive in decision-making despite their desire to be involved in this process. Dentists should seek to actively establish patients' preferences, regardless of mental capacity and consider these in discussions and decisions about dental treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Geddis-Regan
- School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Carlisle Dental Centre, Carlisle, UK
| | - Rebecca R Wassall
- School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Newcastle Dental Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Clare Abley
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Catherine Exley
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Blanchette V, Todkar S, Brousseau-Foley M, Rheault N, Weisz T, Poitras ME, Paquette JS, Tremblay MC, Costa IG, Dogba MJ, Giguere A, de Mestral C, Légaré F. Collaboration and Partnership in a 5-Level Engagement Framework for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Management: A Patient-oriented Scoping Review. Can J Diabetes 2023; 47:682-694.e17. [PMID: 37437841 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2023.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is complex, and patient engagement is essential for DFU healing, but it often comes down to the patient's consultation. Therefore, we sought to document patients' engagement in terms of collaboration and partnership for DFUs in 5 levels (direct care, organizational, policy level, research, and education), as well as strategies for patient engagement using an adapted engagement framework. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of the literature from inception to April 2022 using the Joanna Briggs Institute method and a patient-oriented approach. We also consulted DFU stakeholders to obtain feedback on the findings. The data were extracted using PROGRESS+ factors for an equity lens. The effects of engagement were described using Bodenheimer's quadruple aims for value-based care. RESULTS Of 4,211 potentially eligible records, 15 studies met our eligibility criteria, including 214 patients involved in engagement initiatives. Most studies were recent (9 of 15 since 2020) and involved patient engagement at the direct medical care level (8 of 15). Self-management (7 of 15) was the principal way to clinically engage the patients. None of the studies sought to define the direct influence of patient engagement on health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Very few studies described patients' characteristics. Engaged patients were typically men from high-income countries, in their 50s, with poorly managed type 2 diabetes. We found little rigorous research of patient engagement at all levels for DFUs. There is an urgent need to improve the reporting of research in this area and to engage a diversity of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginie Blanchette
- Department of Human Kinetics and Podiatric Medicine, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada; VITAM---Centre de recherche en santé durable, Research Centre, Québec, Canada.
| | - Shweta Todkar
- Department of Nursing, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada
| | - Magali Brousseau-Foley
- Department of Human Kinetics and Podiatric Medicine, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada; Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Mauricie et du Centre-du-Québec, affiliated with Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Trois-Rivières, Canada
| | - Nathalie Rheault
- Québec SSA Support Unit, Sherbrooke University, Longueil Campus, Longueuil, Québec, Canada
| | - Tom Weisz
- Patient Partner, Diabetes Action Canada, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Patient Partner, Wounds Canada, North York, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marie-Eve Poitras
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Sherbrooke University, Saguenay, Québec, Canada
| | - Jean-Sébastien Paquette
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada; VITAM---Centre de recherche en santé durable, Research Centre, Québec, Canada
| | - Marie-Claude Tremblay
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada; VITAM---Centre de recherche en santé durable, Research Centre, Québec, Canada
| | - Idevânia G Costa
- School of Nursing, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maman Joyce Dogba
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada; VITAM---Centre de recherche en santé durable, Research Centre, Québec, Canada
| | - Anik Giguere
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada; VITAM---Centre de recherche en santé durable, Research Centre, Québec, Canada
| | - Charles de Mestral
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada; VITAM---Centre de recherche en santé durable, Research Centre, Québec, Canada; Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision-Making and Knowledge Translation, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guay-Bélanger S, Aubin E, Cimon M, Archambault P, Blanchette V, Giguere A, Gogovor A, Morin M, Ben Charif A, Ben Gaied N, Bickerstaff J, Chénard N, Emond J, Gilbert J, Violet I, Légaré F. Engagement of Older Adults Receiving Home Care Services and Their Caregivers in Health Decisions in Partnership With Clinical Teams: Protocol for a Multimethod Study to Prioritize and Culturally Adapt Decision Aids for Home Care. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e53150. [PMID: 37889512 PMCID: PMC10696497 DOI: 10.2196/53150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults (people aged 65 years and older) face many difficult decisions. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) can help them and their families make informed value-congruent decisions. Some PtDAs have been developed for the home care context, but little is known about scaling them for use with older adults in a different culture. OBJECTIVE This study aims to (1) assess the scalability of existing PtDAs for older adults in the home care context; (2) prioritize those that best match the decisional needs of older adults in home care; and (3) culturally adapt the prioritized PtDAs so they can be scaled successfully to the Quebec health care system. METHODS This multimethod study includes 3 phases. All phases will be overseen by a steering committee of older adults, caregivers, health professionals, decision makers, community organization representatives, and researchers with the needed expertise. In phase 1, we will use the Innovation Scalability Self-administered Questionnaire, a validated scalability self-assessment tool, to assess the scalability of 33 PtDAs previously identified in a systematic review. Based on their scalability, their quality (based on the International Patient Decision Aids Standards), and the importance of the decision point, we will retain approximately a third of these. In phase 2, we will conduct a 2-round web-based Delphi to prioritize the PtDAs selected in phase 1. Using a snowball recruitment strategy, we aim to recruit 60 Delphi participants in the province of Quebec, including older adults, caregivers, health professionals, decision makers involved in home care services, and PtDA experts. In the first round, we will ask participants to rate the importance of several PtDA decision points according to various criteria such as prevalence and difficulty on a 5-point Likert scale (1=not important to 5=very important). Approximately 6 of the highest-rated PtDAs will be retained for presentation in the second round, and we will select up to 3 PtDAs judged as having the highest priority for cultural adaptation. In phase 3, using the Chenel framework and user-centered design methods, we will update and adapt the PtDAs to the Quebec health care system and integrate these PtDAs into an interprofessional shared decision-making training program for home care teams. The adapted PtDAs will respect the International Patient Decision Aids Standards criteria. RESULTS This study was funded in March 2022 by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Data collection for the web-based Delphi began in October 2023. Results are expected to be published in May 2024. CONCLUSIONS This project will provide relevant and culturally appropriate decision support tools for older adults making difficult decisions and their home care teams that will be ready for scaling across the province of Quebec. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/53150.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Guay-Bélanger
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Emmanuelle Aubin
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Marie Cimon
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Patrick Archambault
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche intégrée pour un système apprenant en santé et services sociaux, Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, QC, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Virginie Blanchette
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Human Kinetics and Podiatric Medicine, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
| | - Anik Giguere
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Amédé Gogovor
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Michèle Morin
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche intégrée pour un système apprenant en santé et services sociaux, Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, QC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Nancy Chénard
- Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, QC, Canada
| | - Julie Emond
- Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, QC, Canada
| | - Julie Gilbert
- Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Isabelle Violet
- Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alotaibi MA, Alhowimel AS, Alodaibi FA, Aloraifi M. The Practice of Shared Decision-Making Among Physiotherapists and Patients with Musculoskeletal Conditions. J Multidiscip Healthc 2023; 16:2655-2665. [PMID: 37706183 PMCID: PMC10496844 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s425315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Shared decision-making (SDM) may be interpreted as a set of core values rather than as a consensus definition. This study aimed to explore how SDM between patients and physiotherapists may lead to patient satisfaction. Patients and Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted to examine the relationship between SDM and patient satisfaction. The study targeted physiotherapists and patients with musculoskeletal pain or disorders. A structured questionnaire (the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire) was developed to show the extent to which patients felt involved in the process by scoring nine items from 0 to 5 on a six-point scale. t-tests were performed to estimate differences in SDM perceptions between patients and physiotherapists, and regression analyses were performed to estimate the best predictors of SDM. Results The questionnaire was completed by a total of 106 patients and nine physiotherapists. The demographic information of the samples was presented with frequency analysis. This study's findings demonstrate no variations in the final SDM perceptions between patients and physiotherapists, but when SDM was contrasted step-by-step (as items), many variances were discovered. These distinctions reinforce the notion that regardless of the end outcome, the process of reaching a consensus has a distinct profile depending on the type of medical care. Therapists emphasize the first steps, possibly because there is sufficient evidence to make a therapeutic decision. However, patients highlight the final steps, perhaps because the moment for a decision based on the consultation's nature is approaching. Conclusion This study demonstrates that SDM is a complex process that must be examined in multiple stages. However, in physiotherapy contexts, this process exhibits extremely different patterns, reflecting a significantly different perspective of the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mazyad A Alotaibi
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed S Alhowimel
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faris A Alodaibi
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Aloraifi
- Salamat Medical Hospital, Department of Physiotherapy, Hail, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Drummond L, Guiney S, Connolly D, Foley C, O'Connor L, O'Carroll T, Flynn R, Rohde D. Experiences of shared decision making in acute hospitals: A mixed methods secondary analysis of the Irish National Inpatient Experience Survey. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 113:107755. [PMID: 37099839 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study explored patient experiences of shared decision making (SDM) in public acute hospitals in Ireland. METHODS Quantitative and qualitative data from three years of the Irish National Inpatient Experience Survey were analysed. Survey questions were mapped to definitions of SDM and subjected to principal components analysis. Three SDM subscales (care on the ward; treatments; discharge) and one overall SDM scale were created. Differences in experiences of SDM by aspects of care and patient group were assessed. Thematic analysis of qualitative responses was undertaken. RESULTS 39,453 patients participated in the survey. The mean SDM experience score was 7.60 ± 2.43. Experience scores were highest on the treatments sub-scale, and lowest during discharge. Patients who had a non-emergency admission, those aged 51-80 years and men had more positive experiences than other groups. Patient comments highlighted that opportunities to clarify information and facilitation of families/caregivers in SDM were found to be lacking. CONCLUSION There were differences in experiences of SDM by aspects of care and patient group. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Efforts to improve SDM in acute hospitals are required, particularly at the time of discharge. SDM may be improved by facilitation of more time for discussion between clinicians and patients and/or their families/caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Drummond
- Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.
| | | | | | - Conor Foley
- Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Laura O'Connor
- Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Rachel Flynn
- Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Daniela Rohde
- Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Van Bostraeten P, Aertgeerts B, Bekkering G, Delvaux N, Haers A, Vanheeswyck M, Vandekendelaere A, Van der Auwera N, Dijckmans C, Ostyn E, Soontjens W, Matthysen W, Schenk N, Mertens L, Jaeken J, Agoritsas T, Vermandere M. Digital encounter decision aids linked to clinical practice guidelines: results from user testing SHARE-IT decision aids in primary care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:97. [PMID: 37217915 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02186-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Encounter decision aids (EDAs) are tools that can support shared decision making (SDM), up to the clinical encounter. However, adoption of these tools has been limited, as they are hard to produce, to keep up-to-date, and are not available for many decisions. The MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation has created a new generation of decision aids that are generically produced along digitally structured guidelines and evidence summaries, in an electronic authoring and publication platform (MAGICapp). We explored general practitioners' (GPs) and patients' experiences with five selected decision aids linked to BMJ Rapid Recommendations in primary care. METHODS We applied a qualitative user testing design to evaluate user experiences for both GPs and patients. We translated five EDAs relevant to primary care, and observed the clinical encounters of 11 GPs when they used the EDA with their patients. We conducted a semi-structured interview with each patient after the consultation and a think-aloud interview with each GPs after multiple consultations. We used the Qualitative Analysis Guide (QUAGOL) for data analysis. RESULTS Direct observations and user testing analysis of 31 clinical encounters showed an overall positive experience. The EDAs created better involvement in decision making and resulted in meaningful insights for patients and clinicians. The design and its interactive, multilayered structure made the tool enjoyable and well-organized. Difficult terminology, scales and numbers hindered understanding of certain information, which was sometimes perceived as too specialized or even intimidating. GPs thought the EDA was not suitable for every patient. They perceived a learning curve was required and the need for time investment was a concern. The EDAs were considered trustworthy as they were provided by a credible source. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that EDAs can be useful tools in primary care by supporting actual shared decision making and enhancing patient involvement. The graphical approach and clear representation help patients better understand their options. To overcome barriers such as health literacy and GPs attitudes, effort is still needed to make the EDAs as accessible, intuitive and inclusive as possible through use of plain language, uniform design, rapid access and training. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study protocol was approved by the The Research Ethics Committee UZ/KU Leuven (Belgium) on 31-10-2019 with reference number MP011977.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter Van Bostraeten
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Bert Aertgeerts
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Geertruida Bekkering
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Delvaux
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anna Haers
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matisse Vanheeswyck
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alexander Vandekendelaere
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Niels Van der Auwera
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Dijckmans
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elise Ostyn
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Willem Soontjens
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wout Matthysen
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Noémie Schenk
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lien Mertens
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jasmien Jaeken
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Agoritsas
- Division General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mieke Vermandere
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Beichler H, Grabovac I, Dorner TE. Integrated Care as a Model for Interprofessional Disease Management and the Benefits for People Living with HIV/AIDS. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:3374. [PMID: 36834069 PMCID: PMC9965658 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Today, antiretroviral therapy (ART) is effectively used as a lifelong therapy to treat people living with HIV (PLWH) to suppress viral replication. Moreover, PLWH need an adequate care strategy in an interprofessional, networked setting of health care professionals from different disciplines. HIV/AIDS poses challenges to both patients and health care professionals within the framework of care due to frequent visits to physicians, avoidable hospitalizations, comorbidities, complications, and the resulting polypharmacy. The concepts of integrated care (IC) represent sustainable approaches to solving the complex care situation of PLWH. AIMS This study aimed to describe the national and international models of integrated care and their benefits regarding PLWH as complex, chronically ill patients in the health care system. METHODS We conducted a narrative review of the current national and international innovative models and approaches to integrated care for people with HIV/AIDS. The literature search covered the period between March and November 2022 and was conducted in the databases Cinahl, Cochrane, and Pubmed. Quantitative and qualitative studies, meta-analyses, and reviews were included. RESULTS The main findings are the benefits of integrated care (IC) as an interconnected, guideline- and pathway-based multiprofessional, multidisciplinary, patient-centered treatment for PLWH with complex chronic HIV/AIDS. This includes the evidence-based continuity of care with decreased hospitalization, reductions in costly and burdensome duplicate testing, and the saving of overall health care costs. Furthermore, it includes motivation for adherence, the prevention of HIV transmission through unrestricted access to ART, the reduction and timely treatment of comorbidities, the reduction of multimorbidity and polypharmacy, palliative care, and the treatment of chronic pain. IC is initiated, implemented, and financed by health policy in the form of integrated health care, managed care, case and care management, primary care, and general practitioner-centered concepts for the care of PLWH. Integrated care was originally founded in the United States of America. The complexity of HIV/AIDS intensifies as the disease progresses. CONCLUSIONS Integrated care focuses on the holistic view of PLWH, considering medical, nursing, psychosocial, and psychiatric needs, as well as the various interactions among them. A comprehensive expansion of integrated care in primary health care settings will not only relieve the burden on hospitals but also significantly improve the patient situation and the outcome of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helmut Beichler
- Nursing School, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Igor Grabovac
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas E. Dorner
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Academy for Ageing Research, Haus der Barmherzigkeit, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bedingfield N, Lashewicz B, Fisher D, King-Shier K. Canadian tuberculosis health care workers' perspectives on education and counselling for patients and family members who are born outside of Canada. Glob Public Health 2023; 18:2174265. [PMID: 36789497 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2023.2174265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Tuberculosis health care workers (TB HCWs) in low incidence settings have important perspectives on providing TB education and counselling to patients and family members born in other countries. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore HCWs' perspectives on barriers and facilitators for capacity-building education and counselling with patients and family members born outside of Canada experiencing advanced infectious TB in Calgary, a city in western Canada. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and field notes and thematically analysed. Twenty-four HCWs representing clerical staff, nurses, physicians, and allied health professionals employed in TB care were interviewed. HCWs described how multi-level barriers such as patients' fear of death, complex intra-family communication, information-laden appointments, and patients' precarious employment collided resulting in overwhelmed patients and reduced connection to family. Some HCWs were unsure how to discuss TB stigma with patients and family members. HCWs perceived that increased continuity of care and providing patients and family members with digestible amounts of information earlier were important steps towards better practice. HCWs identified that patients and families could benefit from preparation for initial appointments, increased continuity, and improved patient education materials. HCWs should also receive skills-training to facilitate individual and family counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Bedingfield
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Bonnie Lashewicz
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Dina Fisher
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Kathryn King-Shier
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.,Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zheng H, Yang L, Hu J, Yang Y. Frequency and Influencing Factors of Shared Decision Making Among Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:e20-e31. [PMID: 36357267 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Due to the diversified and high sensitivity of breast cancer surgical treatment, various decision making styles show different functions in making trade-offs and sharing information. Shared decision making is the best practice paradigm to promote health outcomes. This study aimed to determine the overall frequency of shared decision making and explore influencing factors during the surgical decision-making process from breast cancer patients' perspectives. We searched 8 databases for studies about breast cancer patients' surgical decisional control preferences and shared decision making preference. Two researchers screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the literature quality. Meta-analysis of the frequency of preferred and actual shared decision making and decision congruence was performed. Due to the limited studies of influencing factors, descriptive analysis was used. Fourteen original studies were included in this study. We found the overall pooled frequency of the preferred shared decision making of 48.1% (95%CI 33.5%, 62.6%) and the actual shared decision making of 38.1% (95%CI 33.9%, 42.2%). Moreover, the pooled frequency of the decision congruence between preferred and actual decision styles was 61.7% (95%CI 54.6%, 68.8%). The descriptive analysis findings indicated that the influencing factors of shared decision making included individual factors, surgeon-patient communication factors, and health setting factors. There was a gap between the preferred and actual decision styles in the surgical context. Therefore, health care providers should identify potential shared decision making barriers and facilitators, and advocate the clinical shared decision making model to embed shared decision making into routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongying Zheng
- School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Linning Yang
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiale Hu
- Department of Nurse Anesthesia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - Yan Yang
- School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stolz-Klingenberg C, Bünzen C, Coors M, Flüh C, Stürner KH, Wehkamp K, Clayman ML, Scheibler F, Rüffer JU, Schüttig W, Sundmacher L, Berg D, Geiger F. Comprehensive Implementation of Shared Decision Making in a Neuromedical Center Using the SHARE TO CARE Program. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:131-139. [PMID: 36660043 PMCID: PMC9844139 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s388432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE SHARE TO CARE (S2C) is a comprehensive, multi-module implementation program for shared decision making (SDM). It is currently applied at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein in Kiel, Germany, and among general practitioners at the Federal State of Bremen. This study examines the results of the full implementation of S2C in terms of effectiveness within the Kiel Neuromedical Center comprising the departments of neurology and neurosurgery. METHOD AND DESIGN The S2C program consists of four combined intervention modules: 1) multimodal training of physicians; 2) a patient activation campaign including the ASK-3 method; 3) digital evidence-based patient decision aids; and 4) SDM support by nurses, e.g., as decision coaches. The SDM level before and immediately after implementation was retrospectively assessed in consecutively selected patients on the subscale "Patient Decision Making" of the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICSPDM). Mean scores were compared with t-tests. RESULTS Eighty-nine percent of all physicians (N = 56) completed the SDM training. We developed a total of 12 evidence-based digital decision aids in the center, educated two decision coaches to support patients' decision processes by using decision aids. Physicians adjusted patients' pathways to incorporate the use of decision aids. Patients (n = 261) reported a significant increase in participation (p<0.001; Hedges' g = 0.49) in medical decision making. CONCLUSION The S2C program has been successfully implemented within the entire Neuromedical Center. Patients reported a medium to small increase of perceived involvement in decision making demonstrating the effectiveness of the implementation. For future research, it might be interesting to investigate the sustainability of the effects of S2C. In addition, it seems useful to complement the patient-based evaluation with observer-based data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constanze Stolz-Klingenberg
- National Competency Center for Shared Decision Making, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
- Correspondence: Constanze Stolz-Klingenberg, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus 9, Kiel, 24105, Germany, Tel +49 431 500 20208; +49 151 17271928, Email
| | - Claudia Bünzen
- National Competency Center for Shared Decision Making, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Marie Coors
- Chair of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Charlotte Flüh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Kai Wehkamp
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
- Department of Medical Management, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marla L Clayman
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Administration, Bedford, MA, USA
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Fueloep Scheibler
- National Competency Center for Shared Decision Making, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
- SHARE TO CARE Patientenzentrierte Versorgung GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jens Ulrich Rüffer
- SHARE TO CARE Patientenzentrierte Versorgung GmbH, Cologne, Germany
- TakePart Media+Science GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - Wiebke Schüttig
- Chair of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Sundmacher
- Chair of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniela Berg
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Friedemann Geiger
- National Competency Center for Shared Decision Making, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
- SHARE TO CARE Patientenzentrierte Versorgung GmbH, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Psychology, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stolz-Klingenberg C, Bünzen C, Coors M, Flüh C, Margraf NG, Wehkamp K, Clayman ML, Scheibler F, Wehking F, Rüffer JU, Schüttig W, Sundmacher L, Synowitz M, Berg D, Geiger F. Sustainability of large-scale implementation of shared decision making with the SHARE TO CARE program. Front Neurol 2022; 13:1037447. [PMID: 36504657 PMCID: PMC9726727 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1037447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction SHARE TO CARE (S2C) is a comprehensive implementation program for shared decision making (SDM). It is run at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH) in Kiel, Germany, and consists of four combined intervention modules addressing healthcare professionals and patients: (1) multimodal training of physicians (2) patient activation campaign including the ASK3 method, (3) online evidence-based patient decision aids (4) SDM support by nurses. This study examines the sustainability of the hospital wide SDM implementation by means of the Neuromedical Center comprising the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery. Methods Between 2018 and 2020, the S2C program was applied initially within the Neuromedical Center: We implemented the patient activation campaign, trained 89% of physicians (N = 56), developed 12 patient decision aids and educated two decision coaches. Physicians adjusted the patients' pathways to facilitate the use of decision aids. To maintain the initial implementation, the departments took care that new staff members received training and decision aids were updated. The patient activation campaign was continued. To determine the sustainability of the initial intervention, the SDM level after a maintenance phase of 6-18 months was compared to the baseline level before implementation. Therefore, in- and outpatients received a questionnaire via mail after discharge. The primary endpoint was the "Patient Decision Making" subscale of the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICSPDM). Secondary endpoints were an additional scale measuring SDM (CollaboRATE), and the PrepDM scale, which determines patients' perceived health literacy while preparing for decision making. Mean scale scores were compared using t-tests. Results Patients reported a significantly increased SDM level (PICSPDM p = 0.02; Hedges' g = 0.33; CollaboRATE p = 0.05; Hedges' g = 0.26) and improved preparation for decision making (PrepDM p = 0.001; Hedges' g = 0.34) 6-18 months after initial implementation of S2C. Discussion The S2C program demonstrated its sustainability within the Neuromedical Center at UKSH Kiel in terms of increased SDM and health literacy. Maintaining the SDM implementation required a fraction of the initial intensity. The departments took on the responsibility for maintenance. Meanwhile, an additional health insurance-based reimbursement for S2C secures the continued application of the program. Conclusion SHARE TO CARE promises to be suitable for long-lasting implementation of SDM in hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constanze Stolz-Klingenberg
- National Competency Center for Shared Decision Making, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany,*Correspondence: Constanze Stolz-Klingenberg
| | - Claudia Bünzen
- National Competency Center for Shared Decision Making, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Marie Coors
- Chair of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Charlotte Flüh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Nils G. Margraf
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Kai Wehkamp
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany,Department of Medical Management, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marla L. Clayman
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Administration, Bedford, MA, United States,Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States
| | - Fueloep Scheibler
- National Competency Center for Shared Decision Making, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Felix Wehking
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | | | - Wiebke Schüttig
- Chair of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Sundmacher
- Chair of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Synowitz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Daniela Berg
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Friedemann Geiger
- National Competency Center for Shared Decision Making, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany,Department of Psychology, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hache C, Honoré S, Hache G. Implementation of a patient-teaching workshop to improve pharmacy students' competencies in patient-centered communication: a case report. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:555. [PMID: 35850724 PMCID: PMC9295494 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03618-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pharmacist-patient relationship has evolved over recent decades and the development of clinical pharmacy requires pharmacists to take patient-centered responsibilities. This requires a specific set of skills, such as patient-centered communication. Evaluation of students' competencies in patient-centered communication is challenging in academic settings and complementary assessment methods may be designed in order to overcome the limits of traditional preceptors' ratings or objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). There is increasing interest in a more active patient role in healthcare professional education and there are very few reports about patient-led education in pharmacies. Thus, the objective of this work was to implement a patient-teaching workshop and to assess its impact on pharmacy students' competencies in patient-centered communication. METHODS The workshop was developed in collaboration between four patients, a senior clinical pharmacist and a lecturer in education sciences and implemented in the hospital pharmacy residency program. The main course objective was acquiring the three competencies of the Calgary-Cambridge guide to the medical interview: (i) building a relationship, (ii) conducting structured interview and (iii) gathering information. The learning process integrated: working on participants' perception of pharmacists-patient communication, a first simulated interview, didactic learning and a second simulated interview. After simulated interviews, patients and peer residents assessed learner's performance with a competency chart and provided individual feedback. Assessment methods included comparisons between the first and second interview scores and an anonymous post-course survey. RESULTS Forty-seven residents and 19 patient teachers attended the session. Competency scores were higher after the second interview in all three competencies as rated by both patients (+ 25%) and peer residents (+ 29%). Residents expressed a high satisfaction and reported learning about conducting interviews and soft skills contributing to the development of a relationship with patients. "The involvement of patients" was expressed as most appreciated in the majority of the evaluation charts (87%) and the residents valued the importance of collaborative and interprofessional learning during the workshop. Three themes emerged: (1) patients' expertise, (2) reliability and (3) relationship, which underlined that the students estimated the patients were credible sources of information in this pedagogical context. CONCLUSION This patient-teaching approach improved patient-centered competencies of pharmacy residents and promoted partnership between patients and pharmacy students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Hache
- Aix Marseille Univ, ADEF, 57 avenue escadrille Normandie Niemen, Marseille, 13013, France
| | - Stéphane Honoré
- Aix Marseille Univ, Faculté de Pharmacie, Laboratoire de Pharmacie Clinique, 27 boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, 13005, France
- Aix Marseille Univ, AP-HM, Hôpital de La Timone, Service de Pharmacie, 264 rue saint Pierre, Marseille, 13005, France
| | - Guillaume Hache
- Aix Marseille Univ, AP-HM, Hôpital de La Timone, Service de Pharmacie, 264 rue saint Pierre, Marseille, 13005, France.
- Aix Marseille Univ, Faculté de Pharmacie, 27, boulevard Jean Moulin, 13005, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yılmaz NG, Sungur H, van Weert JCM, van den Muijsenbergh METC, Schouten BC. Enhancing patient participation of older migrant cancer patients: needs, barriers, and eHealth. ETHNICITY & HEALTH 2022; 27:1123-1146. [PMID: 33316171 DOI: 10.1080/13557858.2020.1857338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To gain insight into (1) the unfulfilled instrumental and affective needs of Turkish-Dutch and Moroccan-Dutch older cancer patients/survivors, (2) the barriers perceived by healthcare professionals in fulfilling these needs, and (3) how the Health Communicator, a multilingual eHealth tool, can support the fulfillment of patients'/survivors' needs, and decrease professionals' barriers. DESIGN We conducted a pre-implementation study of the Health Communicator using semi-structured interviews with Turkish-Dutch (n = 10; mean age = 69.10) and Moroccan-Dutch (n = 9; mean age = 69.33) older cancer patients/survivors, and held two focus groups with general practitioners (GPs; n = 7; mean age 45.14) and oncology nurses (ONs; n = 5; mean age = 49.60). Topic list consisted of questions related to needs and perceived barriers. Analysis was based on grounded theory. The acceptance of the Health Communicator was inquired by questions based on the concepts of the Technology Acceptance Model, and analyzed deductively. RESULTS Patients/survivors reported unfulfilled needs concerning: (1) information about cancer (treatment), (2) information about the healthcare system, (3) possibilities regarding psychosocial support, and (4) doctor-patient relationship. Among professionals, the main perceived barriers were: (1) patients'/survivors' low health literacy and language barrier, (2) cultural taboo, (3) lack of insight into patients' instrumental needs, and (4) patients'/survivors' lack of trust in Dutch healthcare. Both patients/survivors and professionals thought that implementing the Health Communicator could be effective in fulfilling most of the needs and decreasing the barriers. However, a majority of the patients/survivors were hesitant regarding the use of it, because they found it too difficult to use. Professionals showed a positive intention towards using the Health Communicator. CONCLUSIONS To enhance patient participation among older migrant cancer patients/survivors, the Health Communicator is, under certain conditions, a promising tool for fulfilling patients'/survivors' unfulfilled instrumental and affective needs and for bridging barriers perceived by professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nida Gizem Yılmaz
- Department of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hande Sungur
- Department of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julia C M van Weert
- Department of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria E T C van den Muijsenbergh
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prevention and care Programme, Pharos, National Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara C Schouten
- Department of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Khunkhun V, Pacheco C, Burns L, Gershen S, Mai TA, Scheeringa MS. Patient preferences for shared decision making in mental health care. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:1048-1049. [PMID: 34373174 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Vininder Khunkhun
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA.
| | - Catalina Pacheco
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA
| | - Lauren Burns
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA
| | - Sara Gershen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA
| | - Thao Anh Mai
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA
| | - Michael S Scheeringa
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Scalia P, Durand MA, Elwyn G. Shared decision-making interventions: An overview and a meta-analysis of their impact on vaccine uptake. J Intern Med 2022; 291:408-425. [PMID: 34700363 DOI: 10.1111/joim.13405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The interest in shared decision making (SDM) and the use of patient decision aids have increased significantly. Research indicates that this approach has benefits, and yet, implementation remains a challenge. To illustrate this development, we focus on vaccine hesitancy which has become a serious public health challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic. Various strategies have been used in healthcare, with limited success, to help patients overcome vaccine hesitancy. It is unclear whether SDM interventions can increase vaccination rates. AIMS Our aim was two-fold: to provide an overview of SDM and the use of patient decision aids and to determine the effect of SDM interventions on vaccine uptake. METHODS To provide an overview, we drew on our knowledge of the field and summarized the most recent systematic reviews. We examined the impact on vaccine hesitancy by searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SDM interventions, conducted a meta-analysis and calculated a pooled odds ratio. Additional outcomes were reported in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS SDM is viewed as the pinnacle of patient-centred care, supported by an ethical imperative and by empirical evidence of benefits. We found 10 RCTs that met our inclusion criteria. SDM interventions significantly increased vaccine uptake compared to control groups (odds ratio = 1.45; 95% confidence interval [1.17-1.80]; p < 0.01). Some RCTs also reported significantly decreased decisional conflict and increased decision confidence. CONCLUSION Future healthcare delivery systems will need to consider how to support the implementation of SDM. Interventions designed to facilitate this approach can represent a helpful, ethically defensible, strategy to increase vaccination rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Scalia
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - M-A Durand
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.,Unité mixte de recherché, Centre d'Épidémiologie et de Recherche en santé des Populations, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.,Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.,Unisanté, Centre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Patient Participation and the Environment: A Scoping Review of Instruments. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19042003. [PMID: 35206191 PMCID: PMC8872044 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Patient participation and the environment are critical factors in achieving qualitative healthcare. We conducted a systematic scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's framework to identify instruments intended to measure patient participation. We assessed those instruments' characteristics, which areas of the healthcare continuum they target, and whether environmental factors are considered. Instruments were considered eligible if they represented the patient perspective and measured patient participation in healthcare. The search was limited to articles written in English and published in the last 10 years. We extracted concepts (i.e., patient empowerment, patient participation, and patient-centeredness) based on the framework developed by Castro et al. and outcomes of significance regarding the review questions and specific objectives. The search was conducted in PsycINFO, CINHAL/EBSCO, and PubMed in September 2019 and July 2020. Of 4802 potential titles, 67 studies reported on a total of 45 instruments that met the inclusion criteria for this review. The concept of patient participation was represented most often in these studies. Although some considered the social environment, no instrument was found to incorporate and address the physical environment. Thirteen instruments were generic and the remaining instruments were intended for specific diagnoses or healthcare contexts. Our work is the first to study instruments from this perspective, and we conclude that there is a lack of instruments that measure aspects of the social and physical environment coherently as part of patient participation.
Collapse
|
19
|
Chung MK, Fagerlin A, Wang PJ, Ajayi TB, Allen LA, Baykaner T, Benjamin EJ, Branda M, Cavanaugh KL, Chen LY, Crossley GH, Delaney RK, Eckhardt LL, Grady KL, Hargraves IG, Hills MT, Kalscheur MM, Kramer DB, Kunneman M, Lampert R, Langford AT, Lewis KB, Lu Y, Mandrola JM, Martinez K, Matlock DD, McCarthy SR, Montori VM, Noseworthy PA, Orland KM, Ozanne E, Passman R, Pundi K, Roden DM, Saarel EV, Schmidt MM, Sears SF, Stacey D, Stafford RS, Steinberg BA, Wass SY, Wright JM. Shared Decision Making in Cardiac Electrophysiology Procedures and Arrhythmia Management. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2021; 14:e007958. [PMID: 34865518 PMCID: PMC8692382 DOI: 10.1161/circep.121.007958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Shared decision making (SDM) has been advocated to improve patient care, patient decision acceptance, patient-provider communication, patient motivation, adherence, and patient reported outcomes. Documentation of SDM is endorsed in several society guidelines and is a condition of reimbursement for selected cardiovascular and cardiac arrhythmia procedures. However, many clinicians argue that SDM already occurs with clinical encounter discussions or the process of obtaining informed consent and note the additional imposed workload of using and documenting decision aids without validated tools or evidence that they improve clinical outcomes. In reality, SDM is a process and can be done without decision tools, although the process may be variable. Also, SDM advocates counter that the low-risk process of SDM need not be held to the high bar of demonstrating clinical benefit and that increasing the quality of decision making should be sufficient. Our review leverages a multidisciplinary group of experts in cardiology, cardiac electrophysiology, epidemiology, and SDM, as well as a patient advocate. Our goal is to examine and assess SDM methodology, tools, and available evidence on outcomes in patients with heart rhythm disorders to help determine the value of SDM, assess its possible impact on electrophysiological procedures and cardiac arrhythmia management, better inform regulatory requirements, and identify gaps in knowledge and future needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angela Fagerlin
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
- Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Informatics Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center for Innovation, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Megan Branda
- University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marleen Kunneman
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Ying Lu
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Dan M. Roden
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sojin Youn Wass
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Smith BM, Sharma R, Das A, Aboumatar H, Pitts SI, Day J, Holzhauer K, Bass E, Bennett WL. Patient and family engagement strategies for children and adolescents with chronic diseases: A review of systematic reviews. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:2213-2223. [PMID: 33678498 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patient and family engagement is important for family-centered care, particularly for children and adolescents with chronic disease. We aimed to 1) identify available evidence from systematic reviews on engagement strategies used to help children, adolescents, and their caregivers manage chronic conditions, and 2) identify gaps in the literature. METHODS We searched PubMed and CINAHL from January 2015 to January 2020 for systematic reviews on patient and family engagement strategies in the pediatrics population (<18 years). Strategies were categorized by direct patient care, health system, and community policy levels. We excluded reviews if interventions were unidirectional or without comparison. RESULTS We identified 25 systematic reviews. Twenty-two evaluated direct patient care, with 14 (279 unique studies) exclusively in pediatrics and 8 (24 unique studies) that included pediatric results with adults. Three reviews (9 unique studies) evaluated health system strategies. Direct patient care reviews focused on self-management support (n = 16) and shared decisionmaking (n = 6). Asthma was the most frequently evaluated condition (n = 14). CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Engagement strategies for children and adolescents with chronic disease are focused on direct patient care, particularly for asthma. More research is needed to address engagement for broader populations, expanded outcomes, and at health system and community levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon M Smith
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
| | - Ritu Sharma
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Asar Das
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Hanan Aboumatar
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Samantha I Pitts
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Jeff Day
- Department of Art as Applied to Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Katherine Holzhauer
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Eric Bass
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Wendy L Bennett
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Haas JW, Rief W, Weiß F, Doering BK, Kleinstäuber M, Ruwoldt S, Sarter L, Thomas R, Rheker J. The effect of patient-centered communication on medication intake: an experimental study. PSYCHOL HEALTH MED 2021; 27:2138-2151. [PMID: 34412546 DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2021.1969666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
It is not only crucial to provide patients with information, but also to communicate this information in a way to enable patient participation in health decisions. Experimental studies investigating the association between the communication style of health professionals and patients' health decisions are rare, which limits causal conclusions. This study investigated the effect of a doctor's patient-centered communication style on the likelihood to take a medication.Healthy women (N = 120) were randomly allocated to one of three groups. They either received a medical consultation characterized by a patient-centered communication style (PC group) or by a doctor-centered communication style (DC group) or they received no consultation at all (control group). All participants were told that the study would investigate the effects of a 'concentration-enhancing medication'. Voluntary intake of the medication (a placebo pill) served as behavioral outcome. Participants' self-rated intention to take the medication was measured at three assessment points. Data were analyzed using a Chi-square-test and a mixed analysis of covariance.In each group, 40 participants were analyzed. Following the consultation, groups did not differ regarding the behavioral outcome, but participants' intention to take the medication was higher in the PC group compared with the control group.Our results indicate that patient-centered communication has a beneficial influence on participants' intention to take medication. Future studies should investigate the role of communication in individuals with health conditions that require a specified treatment plan and taking medication over the long-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia W Haas
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Winfried Rief
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Frauke Weiß
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Bettina K Doering
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.,Department of Clinical and Biological Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany
| | - Maria Kleinstäuber
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.,Department of Psychological Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Sina Ruwoldt
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Lena Sarter
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ruth Thomas
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Julia Rheker
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Schöngut-Grollmus N, Energici MA, Zuñiga N. COVID-19 and Dispositions of the Chilean Healthcare System: Sociomedical Networks in Care Decisions of Chronic Illnesses. FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY 2021; 6:666758. [PMID: 34447806 PMCID: PMC8383208 DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.666758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
This article is an empirical work on decision-making processes in the case of persons with chronic illnesses in the COVID19 pandemic context, regarding their medical care and self-care. Medical decisions are processes that guide the production of a health diagnosis or treatment, using the available information, where the patients' preferences are often incorporated. This article tackles the impact of the pandemic on chronically ill patients' medical decisions when the care system has been significantly altered by it. Considering that health decisions are importantly embedded in social and economic conditions, the pandemic affects a precarious care system and constrains individual possibilities. Chile has a weak support infrastructure for caregivers and a health care system that promotes private health and a low-quality public health system. Hence, the pandemic is an adverse context for chronically ill patients and it alters the conditions in which medical decisions are taken. We performed 10 interviews with chronically ill patients who took responsibility for their own health decisions: five patients diagnosed with common chronic diseases and five patients diagnosed with rare chronic diseases. After Reflexive Thematic Analysis, the results show that the Chilean health system is extremely precarious and that not many alternatives are or have been offered to chronically ill patients in the COVID19 context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - María-Alejandra Energici
- Affect and Subjectivity Lab, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Santiago, Chile
| | - Natalia Zuñiga
- Magíster en Psicología Social, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
de Looper M, van Weert JCM, Schouten BC, Bolle S, Belgers EHJ, Eddes EH, Smets EMA. The Influence of Online Health Information Seeking Before a Consultation on Anxiety, Satisfaction, and Information Recall, Mediated by Patient Participation: Field Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e23670. [PMID: 34255657 PMCID: PMC8290326 DOI: 10.2196/23670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Today, many cancer patients engage in online health information seeking (OHIS). However, little is known about how patients differ in their OHIS levels. In addition, OHIS might influence patient participation during a consultation with a physician, which might mediate the effects on patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is twofold: first, to provide insight into which personal characteristics and psychosocial factors affect patients' OHIS levels and, second, to test the hypothesis that the effects of OHIS on patient outcomes are mediated by patient participation during the consultation. METHODS Patient participation was operationalized in terms of patients' absolute word count; the relative contribution of the patient, compared with the health care provider; and the number of questions and assertions expressed during the consultation. The patient outcomes measured were anxiety after the consultation, satisfaction with the consultation, and information recall. Participants in this study were patients recently diagnosed with colorectal cancer recruited from 6 hospitals in the Netherlands (n=90). Data were collected using questionnaires and audio-recorded consultations of patients with health care providers before their surgery. RESULTS The results showed that younger patients, higher educated patients, patients with a monitoring coping style, and patients who experienced more cancer-related stress engaged more in OHIS. In turn, OHIS was related to patient participation in terms of the patient's absolute word count but not to the relative contribution to the consultation or expressing questions and assertions. We did not find a relation between OHIS and anxiety and OHIS and recall mediated by patient participation. However, we found that patients' absolute word count significantly mediated the positive association between OHIS and patients' satisfaction with the consultation. CONCLUSIONS Results indicate positive implications of OHIS for patients' care experience and, therefore, the importance of helping patients engage in OHIS. However, the results also suggest that OHIS is only successful in increasing a single aspect of patient participation, which might explain the absence of relations with anxiety and recall. The results suggest that more beneficial effects on patient outcomes may be achieved when health care providers support patients in OHIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie de Looper
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Julia C M van Weert
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Barbara C Schouten
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Eric H Eddes
- Deparment of Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Anderson MP, Hyrkas EK. Patient and family perceptions of an inpatient journal. Nursing 2021; 51:62-68. [PMID: 34157005 DOI: 10.1097/01.nurse.0000754044.26660.0b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marguerite Peggy Anderson
- At Maine Medical Center in Portland, Me., Marguerite "Peggy" Anderson is the nursing director and Eira Kristiina Hyrkas is the director of the Center for Nursing Research and Quality Outcomes. Paul Bellfy and Paulette Gallant volunteered and contributed their time and effort to this study
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Elwyn G. Shared decision making: What is the work? PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:1591-1595. [PMID: 33353840 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Revised: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Cooperation has emerged as a fundamental characteristic of human society, and many argue that this ability is the basis for the phenomenal development in our capability as a species. When we focus our attention to the interactions that occur in healthcare, we inevitably notice power asymmetry due to unequal knowledge, experience, and status. However, as many have argued since the 1970s, there is an ethical imperative to respect the agency of individuals, offer information, collaborate, and support deliberation when difficult decisions arise. This process is particularly important when reasonable alternative courses of action exist and where the priorities and preferences of individuals would be expected to sway such decisions. This position article argues that this process, commonly described as shared decision making, involves work that is cognitive, emotional, and relational, and, particularly if people are ill, should have the underpinning goal of restoring autonomy. It covers the origin of the term and describes the core components; it describes how to do the cognitive, emotional, and relational work that is required, and offers a model to guide the process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Level 5 Williamson Translational Research Building, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rebic N, Munro S, Norman WV, Soon JA. Pharmacist checklist and resource guide for mifepristone medical abortion: User-centred development and testing. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2021; 154:166-174. [PMID: 34104270 PMCID: PMC8165881 DOI: 10.1177/17151635211005503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nevena Rebic
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Sarah Munro
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Wendy V Norman
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Judith A Soon
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the German version of the IcanSDM measure - a cross-sectional study among healthcare professionals. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:541. [PMID: 34078373 PMCID: PMC8171052 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06430-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Shared decision-making (SDM) between patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) is a key component of patient-centred care. To implement SDM in clinical practice and to evaluate its effects, it is helpful to know about HCPs’ perception of SDM barriers. The measure IcanSDM was developed in Canada and assesses the perception of SDM barriers. To our knowledge, no equivalent measure exists in German. Therefore, the aim of this study was to translate and adapt the IcanSDM measure to be used by a German speaking population and evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods This is a cross-sectional psychometric study based on a secondary analysis of baseline data from a SDM implementation study. The original 8-item IcanSDM was translated into German using a team translation protocol. We assessed comprehensibility via cognitive interviews with n = 11 HCPs. Based on results of cognitive interviews, the translated IcanSDM version was revised. Two hundred forty-two HCPs filled out the measure. Psychometric analysis included acceptance (completion rate), item characteristics (response distribution, skewness, item difficulties, corrected item-total correlations, inter-item correlations), factorial structure (confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), model fit), and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α). Results We translated and adapted the German IcanSDM successfully except for item 8, which had to be revised after the cognitive interviews. Completion rate was 98%. Skewness of the items ranged between −.797 and 1.25, item difficulties ranged between 21.63 and 70.85, corrected item-total-correlations ranged between .200 and .475, inter-item correlations ranged between .005 and .412. Different models based on CFA results did not provide a valid factorial structure. Cronbach’s α ranged between .563 and .651 for different factor models. Conclusion We provide the first German measure for assessing perception of SDM barriers by HCPs. The German IcanSDM is a brief measure with good acceptance. However, we found unsatisfying psychometric properties, which were comparable to results of the original scale. In a next step, the IcanSDM should be further developed and modified and predictive validity should be evaluated. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06430-3.
Collapse
|
28
|
Borschuk AP, Williams SE, McClure JM, Kendall M, Mack L, Coleman M, Gurbani N, Benscoter D, Amin R, Stark LJ. A novel behavioral health program for family caregivers of children admitted to a transitional chronic ventilator unit. Pediatr Pulmonol 2021; 56:1635-1643. [PMID: 33647193 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.25327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The care of mechanically ventilated pediatric patients is complex and burdensome. It is essential to adequately support the family caregivers of these children to optimize outcomes; however, there is no literature describing interventions for caregivers in this population. RESEARCH QUESTION This study described a novel behavioral health program and examined its impact on family caregiver engagement and psychological distress on a pediatric inpatient chronic ventilator unit. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Electronic chart review was completed with retrospective and prospective participant enrollment for the purposes of longitudinal evaluation of caregiver engagement. For analytic purposes, participants were grouped into three categories: (1) preprogram, (2) postprogram, and (3) postprogram with completion of psychotherapy. RESULTS The behavioral health program was associated with increased caregiver participation in rounds, t = 7.76, p = < .001. Parents who completed a course of psychotherapy within the behavioral health program demonstrated reduced time to training completion (F = 5.89; p < .01), higher staff-rated caregiver engagement (F = 3.69; p < .05), and significantly reduced levels of caregiver distress (t = 2.09; p < .05).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrienne P Borschuk
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Sara E Williams
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Jessica M McClure
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Megan Kendall
- Division of Social Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Lisa Mack
- Division of Patient Services Administration, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Michelle Coleman
- Division of Patient Services Administration, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Neepa Gurbani
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Dan Benscoter
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Raouf Amin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Lori J Stark
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Qudah B, Thakur T, Chewning B. Factors influencing patient participation in medication counseling at the community pharmacy: A systematic review. Res Social Adm Pharm 2021; 17:1863-1876. [PMID: 33766505 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Findings document that patient participation in pharmacy encounters is associated with favorable outcomes. However, there is a need to understand factors that may enhance or hinder patient engagement and pharmacist counseling behaviors during their medication discussions. This review aims to: (1) identify barriers and facilitators for patient engagement in pharmacy consultations, (2) explore the relationship between patient factors (such as demographics and communication behavior) and subsequent pharmacist counseling behavior. METHODS A systematic review of literature using PRISMA guidelines examined studies published in English addressing influences on patient participation and the relationship between patient factors and pharmacist counseling behavior. Four databases were used - PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Findings were framed thematically within the constructs of Street's Linguistic Model of Patient Participation in Care (LM). FINDINGS Fifty studies from 1983 to 2019, including 37 using self-reported data, were identified. Patient involvement in patient-pharmacist communication was influenced by enabling factors such as patient knowledge, communication skills, and pharmacy environment. Predisposing factors for participation ranged from patients' beliefs and past experiences to demographic characteristics such as gender and age. Pharmacists' participative behavior with patients was positively associated with patients' engagement and perceived patient cues in the conversation. CONCLUSION This systematic review identified predictors of patients' engagement in pharmacy encounters drawing on LM framework. Various predisposing factors, enabling factors, and pharmacist' responses impacted patients' willingness to actively participate in medication counseling at community pharmacies. Equally important, studies documented considerable impact by patients on pharmacists' counseling behavior. Pharmacy encounters should no longer be viewed as controlled simply by pharmacists' expertise and agendas. Patient characteristics and factors such as patient question-asking and expectations also appear to be associated with and influence patient-pharmacist interpersonal communication. Additional research needs to address the identified facilitators and barriers to enhance patient participation and pharmacist counseling behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonyan Qudah
- Department of Social and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
| | - Tanvee Thakur
- Research Triangle Institute, 3005 Boardwalk Drive, Suite 105, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA
| | - Betty Chewning
- Department of Social and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tong G, Geng Q, Xu T, Wang D, Liu T. Smartphone and web-based independent consultation and feedback for joint replacement surgeries: a randomized control trial protocol. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:85. [PMID: 33663460 PMCID: PMC7934418 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01457-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cost control and usage regulation of medical materials (MMs) are the practical issues that the government pays close attention to. Although it is well established that there is great potential to mobilize doctors and patients in participating MMs-related clinical decisions, few interventions adopt effective measures against specific behavioral deficiencies. This study aims at developing and validating an independent consultation and feedback system (ICFS) for optimizing clinical decisions on the use of MMs for inpatients needing joint replacement surgeries. Methods Development of the research protocol is based on a problem or deficiency list derived on a trans-theoretical framework which incorporates including mainly soft systems-thinking, information asymmetry, crisis-coping, dual delegation and planned behavior. The intervention consists of two main components targeting at patients and doctors respectively. Each of the intervention ingredients is designed to tackle the doctor and patient-side problems with MMs using in joint replacement surgeries. The intervention arm receives 18 months' ICFS intervention program on the basis of the routine medical services; while the control arm, only the routine medical services. Implementation of the intervention is supported by an online platform established and maintained by the Quality Assurance Center for Medical Care in Anhui Province, a smartphone-based application program (APP) and a web-based clinical support system. Discussion The implementation of this study is expected to significantly reduce the deficiencies and moral hazards in decision-making of MMs using through the output of economic, efficient, sustainable and easy-to-promote cooperative intervention programs, thus greatly reducing medical costs and standardizing medical behaviors. Trial registration number ISRCTN10152297.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guixian Tong
- School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, No.193 Tunxi Road, Hefei, People's Republic of China.,The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, No.17 Lujiang Road, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Qingqing Geng
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.177 Meishan Road, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Tong Xu
- School of Data Science, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 443 Huangshan Road, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Debin Wang
- School of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, No.81 Meishan Road, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Tongzhu Liu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, No.17 Lujiang Road, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wehkamp K, Kiefer FB, Geiger F, Scheibler F, Rueffer JU, Donner-Banzhoff N, Betsch C. Enhancing Specific Health Literacy with a Digital Evidence-Based Patient Decision Aid for Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15:1269-1279. [PMID: 34163144 PMCID: PMC8214525 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s311470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health literacy is an important competency to make informed, shared decisions in line with patient's preferences. On the other hand, lower health literacy is associated with poorer health outcomes. Evidence-based patient decision aids (EbPDA) are validated instruments to support informed medical decisions and empower patients for relevant involvement in their care. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a digital EbPDA for hypertension on health literacy. METHODS In a randomized controlled trial, 124 participants were presented with a web-based scenario related to a newly diagnosed condition of arterial hypertension. The intervention group was provided with an online decision aid, while the control group was prompted to search for related information without support. Specific health literacy for hypertension was operationalized based on the European survey for health literacy (HLS-EU-Q47). RESULTS The intervention group showed a statistically significant increase in subjectively perceived overall specific health literacy regarding hypertension (p=0.02, Cohen's d=0.44). The effect was also statistically significant for the subcategories understanding, appraising, and applying health-related information (all p<0.05). At least equal results could be shown for participants with a lower level of education compared to participants with a high level. CONCLUSION The findings suggest that digital EbPDAs can be an effective and easily scalable instrument to improve populations' specific health literacy. A possible advantage of the measure could be that patients are addressed concerning important and pressing personal decisions, fostering awareness of the individual's need for health literacy to reflect one's options and preferences. EbPDAs may also be a promising approach to target vulnerable populations, as the investigated EbPDA seems to perform equally in less versus more educated individuals. For future research, it may be interesting to investigate whether EbPDAs have effects on general health literacy that go beyond the disease specifically addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Wehkamp
- Department of Pediatrics/Project SHARE TO CARE, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
- Department of Medical Management, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- Correspondence: Kai Wehkamp Department of Internal Medicine I, Project SHARE TO CARE, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Kiel, 24105, GermanyTel +49 (0)431-500-0 Email
| | - Felicia Beatrice Kiefer
- Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Thüringen, Germany
| | - Friedemann Geiger
- Department of Pediatrics/Project SHARE TO CARE, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
- Department of Psychology, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fueloep Scheibler
- Department of Pediatrics/Project SHARE TO CARE, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | | | - Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
- Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Marburg, Marburg, Hessen, Germany
| | - Cornelia Betsch
- Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Thüringen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Schöngut-Grollmus N, Energici MA. Decisiones médicas en enfermedades raras: de su definición estadística a su comprensión social. SAUDE E SOCIEDADE 2021. [DOI: 10.1590/s0104-12902021200393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumen Este ensayo teórico pretende analizar las decisiones médicas en el caso de las enfermedades raras. Una decisión médica es un proceso que orienta la producción de un diagnóstico o un tratamiento de salud, utilizando la información y evidencia disponible, en el cual muchas veces se incorporan las preferencias de los pacientes. En el caso de las enfermedades comunes o frecuentes, existe información clara y disponible sobre las distintas alternativas frente a un problema de salud. En el caso de las enfermedades raras, que están estadísticamente definidas como aquellas patologías que tienen prevalencia inferior a 1:2000, no suelen existir tales alternativas. Por la cronicidad y gravedad que este tipo de patologías suelen revestir, la ausencia de posibilidades se convierte en un problema que tiene dimensiones sanitarias y sociales. En este sentido, este artículo propone una transición de una definición estadística de las enfermedades a una definición social, que permita a futuras investigaciones conocer y profundizar en los procesos y efectos sanitarios, psicológicos y sociales sobre las enfermedades raras y su padecimiento.
Collapse
|
33
|
Tay E. Patient involvement in health innovations: Necessary, but challenging. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:47. [PMID: 32534815 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Revised: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene Tay
- Office of the Senior Deputy President and Provost, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119077, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Aufegger L, Bùi KH, Bicknell C, Darzi A. Designing a paediatric hospital information tool with children, parents, and healthcare staff: a UX study. BMC Pediatr 2020; 20:469. [PMID: 33032549 PMCID: PMC7542856 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-020-02361-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The hospital patient pathway for having treatment procedures can be daunting for younger patients and their family members, especially when they are about to undergo a complex intervention. Opportunities to mentally prepare young patients for their hospital treatments, e.g. for surgical procedures, include tools such as therapeutic clowns, medical dolls, or books and board games. However, while promising in reducing pre-operative anxiety and negative behaviours, they may be resource intensive, costly, and not always readily available. In this study, we co-designed a digital hospital information system with children, parents and clinicians, in order to prepare children undergoing medical treatment. METHOD The study took place in the UK and consisted of two parts: In part 1, we purposively sampled 37 participants (n=22 parents, and n=15 clinicians) to understand perceptions and concerns of an hospital information platform specifically design for and addressed to children. In part 2, 14 children and 11 parents attended an audio and video recorded co-design workshop alongside a graphic designer and the research team to have their ideas explored and reflected on for the design of such information technology. Consequently, we used collected data to conduct thematic analysis and narrative synthesis. RESULTS Findings from the survey were categorised into four themes: (1) the prospect of a hospital information system (parents' inputs); (2) content-specific information needed for the information system (parents' and clinicians' inputs); (3) using the virtual information system to connect young patients and parents (parents' inputs); and (4) how to use the virtual hospital information system from a clinician's perspective (clinicians' inputs). In contrast, the workshop highlighted points in times children were most distressed/relaxed, and derived the ideal hospital visit in both their and their parents' perspectives. CONCLUSIONS The findings support the use of virtual information systems for children, in particular to explore and learn about the hospital, its facilities, and the responsibilities of healthcare professionals. Our findings call for further investigations and experiments in developing safer and more adequate delivery of care for specific age groups of healthcare users. Practical and theoretical implications for improving the quality and safety in healthcare delivery are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Aufegger
- (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translation Research Centre (PSTRC), Imperial College London, 10 S Wharf Rd, London, W2 1PE, UK.
| | - Khánh Hà Bùi
- (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translation Research Centre (PSTRC), Imperial College London, 10 S Wharf Rd, London, W2 1PE, UK
| | - Colin Bicknell
- (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translation Research Centre (PSTRC), Imperial College London, 10 S Wharf Rd, London, W2 1PE, UK
| | - Ara Darzi
- (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translation Research Centre (PSTRC), Imperial College London, 10 S Wharf Rd, London, W2 1PE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schumann S, Gschmeidler B, Pellegrini G. Knowing, relationships and trust-citizens' perceptions of whole genome sequencing for the Genetics Clinic of the Future. J Community Genet 2020; 12:67-80. [PMID: 32997319 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-020-00486-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this article is to present various views from different groups of citizens on the topic of whole genome sequencing (WGS). Sixteen focus groups were carried out in Italy and Austria which aimed at reflecting on the question of how to ensure that the implementation of WGS into the clinic is relevant and responsive to the needs of all members of society. In the qualitative analysis of the focus groups, three key themes (knowing, relationships and trust) were investigated. Although the majority of the participants favoured a person-centred care approach, we also found more radical perspectives in the relationship theme. This includes a self-centred orientation in which health care institutions should be prepared to integrate self-interpretation efforts of citizens and develop strategies to deal with them. Different attitudes towards getting to know genetic information (knowing) and varied approaches to decision-making for or against the use of WGS were observed. Personal capacities, in particular those to handle medical information, were emphasized as key factors. This means that it is important not to connect the desire not to know with a rejection of the technology per se but rather to support information and consultancy processes that effectively involve citizens. Concerning the third theme, we have underlined the important role of mistrust in addition to trust because it mostly points to areas or conditions considered problematic. Thus, mistrust is also a way to articulate critique, for example, of the profit-making with patient data, that has to be taken seriously by governance.
Collapse
|
36
|
Breitbart EW, Choudhury K, Andersen AD, Bunde H, Breitbart M, Sideri AM, Fengler S, Zibert JR. Improved patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy in skin diseases with a Visual Clinical Decision Support System-A feasibility study with general practitioners. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0235410. [PMID: 32726308 PMCID: PMC7390264 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient satisfaction is an important indicator of health care quality, and it remains an important goal for optimal treatment outcomes to reduce the level of misdiagnoses and inappropriate or absent therapeutic actions. Digital support tools for differential diagnosis to assist clinicians in reaching the correct diagnosis may be helpful, but how the use of these affect patients is not clear. The primary objective of this feasibility study was to investigate patient experience and satisfaction in a primary care setting where general practitioners (GPs) used a visual clinical decision support system (CDSS) compared with standard consultations. Secondary objectives were diagnostic accuracy and length of consultation. Thirty-one patients with a dermatologist-confirmed skin diagnosis were allocated to consult GPs that had been randomized to conduct either standard consultations (SDR, n = 21) or CDSS (n = 16) on two separate study days one week apart. All patients were diagnosed independently by multiple GPs (n = 3–8) in both the SDR and CDSS study arms. Using the CDSS, more patients felt involved in the decision making (P = 0.05). In addition, more patients were exposed to images during the consultations (P = 6.8e-27), and 83% of those that were shown images replied they felt better supported in the consultation. The use of CDSS significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy (34%, P = 0.007), and did not increase the duration of the consultation (median 10 minutes in both arms). This study shows for the first time that compared with standard GP consultations, CDSS assist the GP on skin related diagnoses and improve patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy without impacting the duration of the consultations. This is likely to increase correct treatment choices, patient adherence, and overall result in better healthcare outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Henriette Bunde
- Association of Dermatological Prevention (ADP), Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Susanne Fengler
- Association of Dermatological Prevention (ADP), Hamburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rocha SR, Romão GS, Setúbal MSV, Lajos GJ, Luz AG, Collares CF, Amaral E. Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Communication Assessment Tool for Use in a Simulated Clinical Setting. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE 2020; 32:308-318. [PMID: 32090632 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1717958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Construct: The Communication Assessment Tool (CAT) is a 14-item instrument developed in English to assess medical trainees' interpersonal communication skills from the patient's perspective in clinical settings. Background: Using validated instruments and simulated patients constitutes good practice in assessing doctor-patient communication. The CAT was designed for use in real practice, but has not yet been applied to assessing OB-GYN residents' delivery of bad news in Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) stations. This study aims to provide validity evidence for using the CAT to assess residents' interpersonal communication skills under difficult circumstances in a simulated clinical setting in Brazil. Approach: Cross-cultural adaptation comprised translation into Portuguese, synthesis of translations, and back-translation. Next, a committee of 10 external and independent experts rated the items for linguistic equivalence and relevance to the overall scale. Researchers used the expert ratings to produce a preliminary Brazilian-Portuguese version. This version was applied by four simulated patients to assess 28 OB-GYN residents completing two, 10-minute OSCE stations focused on delivering bad news. Item and scale content validity indices and internal-consistency reliability were calculated. Simulated patients were interviewed to clarify any doubt regarding the content and usability of the tool and their response process. Findings: Thirteen of the 14 items in the Brazilian-Portuguese version were considered "equivalent" by at least 70% of the experts. All items were considered relevant by 100% of the experts. The Item Content Validity Index ranged from .9 to 1, and the Scale Content Validity Index was .99. The instrument showed good reliability for both scenarios (Cronbach's alpha > .90). Simulated patients considered the CAT easy to understand and complete. Conclusions: This study provides validity evidence for using the Brazilian-Portuguese CAT in a simulated clinical environment to assess OB-GYN residents' delivery of bad news. Based on this study's findings, the OB-GYN Department organized an annual formative assessment for residents to improve their interpersonal communication skills. This version of the CAT may also be applicable to other specialties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Giuliane Jesus Lajos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Adriana Gomes Luz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Carlos Fernando Collares
- Department of Educational Development and Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Eliana Amaral
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gernant SA, Adeoye-Olatunde OA, Murawski MM, Jaynes H, Chewning B, Knox LM, Martinez III M, Schommer JC, Snyder ME. Experiences Applying Technology to Overcome Common Challenges in Pharmacy Practice-Based Research in the United States. PHARMACY 2020; 8:E93. [PMID: 32486241 PMCID: PMC7356027 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy8020093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the importance of pharmacy practice-based research in generating knowledge that results in better outcomes for patients, health systems and society alike, common challenges to PPBR persist. Herein, we authors describe PPBR challenges our research teams have encountered, and our experiences using technology-driven solutions to overcome such challenges. Notably, limited financial resources reduce the time available for clinicians and researchers to participate in study activities; therefore, resource allocation must be optimized. We authors have also encountered primary data collection challenges due to unique data needs and data access/ownership issues. Moreover, we have experienced a wide geographic dispersion of study practices and collaborating researchers; a lack of trained, on-site research personnel; and the identification and enrollment of participants meeting study eligibility criteria. To address these PPBR challenges, we authors have begun to turn to technology-driven solutions, as described here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Gernant
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, 69 North Eagleville Rd., Storrs, CT 06226, USA
| | - Omolola A. Adeoye-Olatunde
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, 640 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (O.A.A.-O.); (H.J.); (M.E.S.)
| | - Matthew M. Murawski
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; (M.M.M.); (M.M.III)
| | - Heather Jaynes
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, 640 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (O.A.A.-O.); (H.J.); (M.E.S.)
| | - Betty Chewning
- Social and Administrative Sciences Division, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53705, USA;
| | - Lyndee M. Knox
- LA Net Community Health Resource Network Collaboratory, 800 East Ocean Blvd, Suite 104, Long Beach, CA 90802, USA;
| | - Moises Martinez III
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; (M.M.M.); (M.M.III)
| | - Jon C. Schommer
- College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, 308 Harvard St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA;
| | - Margie E. Snyder
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, 640 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (O.A.A.-O.); (H.J.); (M.E.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Steel A, Diezel H, Wardle J, Adams J. Working with women: Semi-structured interviews with Australian complementary medicine maternity care practitioners. Women Birth 2020; 33:e295-e301. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Revised: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
40
|
Damman OC, Jani A, de Jong BA, Becker A, Metz MJ, de Bruijne MC, Timmermans DR, Cornel MC, Ubbink DT, van der Steen M, Gray M, van El C. The use of PROMs and shared decision-making in medical encounters with patients: An opportunity to deliver value-based health care to patients. J Eval Clin Pract 2020; 26:524-540. [PMID: 31840346 PMCID: PMC7155090 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recent emphasis on value-based health care (VBHC) is thought to provide new opportunities for shared decision-making (SDM) in the Netherlands, especially when using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine medical encounters. It is still largely unclear about how PROMs could be linked to SDM and what we expect from clinicians in this respect. AIM To describe approaches and lessons learned in the fields of SDM and VBHC implementation that converge in using PROMs in medical encounters. APPROACH Based on input from three Dutch forerunner case examples and available evidence about SDM and VBHC, we describe barriers and facilitators regarding the use of PROMs and SDM in the medical encounter. Barriers and facilitators were structured according to a conversational model that included monitoring and managing, team talk, option talk, choice talk, and decision talk. Key lessons learned and recommendations were synthesized. RESULTS The use of individual, N = 1 PROMs scores in the medical encounter has been largely achieved in the forerunner projects. Conversation on monitoring and managing is relatively well implemented, and option talk to some extent, unlike team talk, and decision talk. Aggregated PROMs information describing outcomes of treatment options seemed to be scarcely used. Experienced barriers largely corresponded to what is known from the literature, eg, perceived lack of time and lack of tools summarizing the options. Some concerns were identified about increasing health care consumption as a result of using PROMs and SDM in the medical encounter. CONCLUSION Successful implementation of SDM within VBHC initiatives may not be self-evident, even though individual, N = 1 PROMs scores are being used in the medical encounter. Education and staff resources on meso and macro levels may facilitate the more time-consuming SDM aspects. It seems fruitful to especially target team talk and choice talk in redesigning clinical pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga C. Damman
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational HealthAmsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Anant Jani
- Value Based Healthcare Programme, Department of Primary CareUniversity of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Brigit A. de Jong
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, MS Center AmsterdamAmsterdam Neuroscience Research InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Becker
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Amsterdam UMCVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMCUniversiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Margot J. Metz
- Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral SciencesGGz Breburg and Tilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
| | - Martine C. de Bruijne
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational HealthAmsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Danielle R. Timmermans
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational HealthAmsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Martina C. Cornel
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical GeneticsAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Dirk T. Ubbink
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMC, Universiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Marije van der Steen
- Department of Strategy and PolicyAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Muir Gray
- Value Based Healthcare Programme, Department of Primary CareUniversity of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Carla van El
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical GeneticsAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wieringa TH, Sanchez-Herrera MF, Espinoza NR, Tran VT, Boehmer K. Crafting Care That Fits: Workload and Capacity Assessments Complementing Decision Aids in Implementing Shared Decision Making. J Particip Med 2020; 12:e13763. [PMID: 33064091 PMCID: PMC7434057 DOI: 10.2196/13763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Revised: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
About 42% of adults have one or more chronic conditions and 23% have multiple chronic conditions. The coordination and integration of services for the management of patients living with multimorbidity is important for care to be efficient, safe, and less burdensome. Minimally disruptive medicine may optimize this coordination and integration. It is a patient-centered approach to care that focuses on achieving patient goals for life and health by seeking care strategies that fit a patient’s context and are minimally disruptive and maximally supportive. The cumulative complexity model practically orients minimally disruptive medicine–based care. In this model, the patient workload-capacity imbalance is the central mechanism driving patient complexity. These elements should be accounted for when making decisions for patients with chronic conditions. Therefore, in addition to decision aids, which may guide shared decision making, we propose to discuss and clarify a potential workload-capacity imbalance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas H Wieringa
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Nataly R Espinoza
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Viet-Thi Tran
- METHODS Team, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS, Université de Paris, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France
| | - Kasey Boehmer
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Jayadevappa R, Chhatre S, Gallo JJ, Wittink MN, Morales KH, Lee DI, Guzzo T, Vapiwala N, Wong YN, Newman DK, Van Arsdalen K, Malkowicz SB, Schwartz JS, Wein AJ. Reply to A. Vickers et al. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:3463-3464. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.01450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ravishankar Jayadevappa
- Ravishankar Jayadevappa, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; Sumedha Chhatre, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph J. Gallo, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Marsha N. Wittink, MD, MBE, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Knashawn H. Morales, ScD, David I. Lee, MD, Thomas Guzzo, MD,
| | - Sumedha Chhatre
- Ravishankar Jayadevappa, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; Sumedha Chhatre, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph J. Gallo, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Marsha N. Wittink, MD, MBE, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Knashawn H. Morales, ScD, David I. Lee, MD, Thomas Guzzo, MD,
| | - Joseph J. Gallo
- Ravishankar Jayadevappa, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; Sumedha Chhatre, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph J. Gallo, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Marsha N. Wittink, MD, MBE, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Knashawn H. Morales, ScD, David I. Lee, MD, Thomas Guzzo, MD,
| | - Marsha N. Wittink
- Ravishankar Jayadevappa, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; Sumedha Chhatre, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph J. Gallo, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Marsha N. Wittink, MD, MBE, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Knashawn H. Morales, ScD, David I. Lee, MD, Thomas Guzzo, MD,
| | - Knashawn H. Morales
- Ravishankar Jayadevappa, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; Sumedha Chhatre, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph J. Gallo, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Marsha N. Wittink, MD, MBE, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Knashawn H. Morales, ScD, David I. Lee, MD, Thomas Guzzo, MD,
| | - David I. Lee
- Ravishankar Jayadevappa, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; Sumedha Chhatre, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph J. Gallo, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Marsha N. Wittink, MD, MBE, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Knashawn H. Morales, ScD, David I. Lee, MD, Thomas Guzzo, MD,
| | - Thomas Guzzo
- Ravishankar Jayadevappa, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; Sumedha Chhatre, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph J. Gallo, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Marsha N. Wittink, MD, MBE, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Knashawn H. Morales, ScD, David I. Lee, MD, Thomas Guzzo, MD,
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Ravishankar Jayadevappa, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; Sumedha Chhatre, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph J. Gallo, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Marsha N. Wittink, MD, MBE, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Knashawn H. Morales, ScD, David I. Lee, MD, Thomas Guzzo, MD,
| | - Yu-Ning Wong
- Ravishankar Jayadevappa, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; Sumedha Chhatre, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph J. Gallo, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Marsha N. Wittink, MD, MBE, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Knashawn H. Morales, ScD, David I. Lee, MD, Thomas Guzzo, MD,
| | - Diane K. Newman
- Ravishankar Jayadevappa, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; Sumedha Chhatre, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph J. Gallo, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Marsha N. Wittink, MD, MBE, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Knashawn H. Morales, ScD, David I. Lee, MD, Thomas Guzzo, MD,
| | - Keith Van Arsdalen
- Ravishankar Jayadevappa, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; Sumedha Chhatre, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph J. Gallo, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Marsha N. Wittink, MD, MBE, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Knashawn H. Morales, ScD, David I. Lee, MD, Thomas Guzzo, MD,
| | - S. Bruce Malkowicz
- Ravishankar Jayadevappa, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; Sumedha Chhatre, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph J. Gallo, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Marsha N. Wittink, MD, MBE, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Knashawn H. Morales, ScD, David I. Lee, MD, Thomas Guzzo, MD,
| | - J. Sanford Schwartz
- Ravishankar Jayadevappa, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; Sumedha Chhatre, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph J. Gallo, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Marsha N. Wittink, MD, MBE, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Knashawn H. Morales, ScD, David I. Lee, MD, Thomas Guzzo, MD,
| | - Alan J. Wein
- Ravishankar Jayadevappa, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; Sumedha Chhatre, PhD, MS, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph J. Gallo, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Marsha N. Wittink, MD, MBE, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Knashawn H. Morales, ScD, David I. Lee, MD, Thomas Guzzo, MD,
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Atakro CA, Armah E, Atakro A, Ahenkora K, Addo SB, Aboagye JS, Blay AA, Akuoko CP, Gross J. Patient Participation in Nursing Care: Views From Ghanaian Nurses, Nursing Students, and Patients. SAGE Open Nurs 2019; 5:2377960819880761. [PMID: 33415256 PMCID: PMC7774420 DOI: 10.1177/2377960819880761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2019] [Revised: 09/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous studies on patient participation reported inconclusive benefits of patient participation in health care. Consequently, the World Health Organization is actively highlighting the need for the participation of patients and their families in their care. The aim of this study was to explore the views of nurses, nursing students, and patients on patient participation in Ghanaian hospitals. Sixty-five participants made up of 15 patients, 25 registered general nurses, and 25 undergraduate nursing students were involved in the study. Data collection was done through interviews and focus group discussions. Content analysis was utilized in analyzing the data to generate four main categories. These categories were as follows: (a) meaning of patient participation in Ghana, (b) patient participation encouraged more during discharge education, (c) patient participation in nursing care higher in private and smaller hospitals, and (d) perceived facilitators and inhibitors of patient participation in nursing care. Participants in this study indicated that patient participation in nursing care meant involvement of patient in treatment decisions and nursing care procedures. Participants agreed that patient participation in nursing care was mostly encouraged during discharge education. Participation was perceived to be higher in private and smaller hospitals. Wealth and higher education were perceived as facilitators of patient participation while workload and high patient acuity were perceived as inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Confidence A Atakro
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Christian Service University College, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Ernestina Armah
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Christian Service University College, Kumasi, Ghana
| | | | - Kwaku Ahenkora
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Christian Service University College, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Stella B Addo
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Christian Service University College, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Janet S Aboagye
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Christian Service University College, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Alice A Blay
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Christian Service University College, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Cynthia P Akuoko
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Christian Service University College, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Janet Gross
- Mother Patern College of Health Sciences, Global Health Services Partnership Program - Peace Corps, Monrovia, Liberia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Müller E, Strukava A, Scholl I, Härter M, Diouf NT, Légaré F, Buchholz A. Strategies to evaluate healthcare provider trainings in shared decision-making (SDM): a systematic review of evaluation studies. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026488. [PMID: 31230005 PMCID: PMC6596948 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Revised: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES We performed a systematic review of studies evaluating healthcare provider (HCP) trainings in shared decision-making (SDM) to analyse their evaluation strategies. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS HCP trainings in SDM from all healthcare settings. METHODS We searched scientific databases (Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL), performed reference and citation tracking, contacted experts in the field and scanned the Canadian inventory of SDM training programmes for healthcare professionals. We included articles reporting data of summative evaluations of HCP trainings in SDM. Two reviewers screened records, assessed full-text articles, performed data extraction and assessed study quality with the integrated quality criteria for review of multiple study designs (ICROMS) tool. Analysis of evaluation strategies included data source use, use of unpublished or published measures and coverage of Kirkpatrick's evaluation levels. An evaluation framework based on Kirkpatrick's evaluation levels and the Quadruple Aim framework was used to categorise identified evaluation outcomes. RESULTS Out of 7234 records, we included 41 articles reporting on 30 studies: cluster-randomised (n=8) and randomised (n=9) controlled trials, controlled (n=1) and non-controlled (n=7) before-after studies, mixed-methods (n=1), qualitative (n=1) and post-test (n=3) studies. Most studies were conducted in the USA (n=9), Germany (n=8) or Canada (n=7) and evaluated physician trainings (n=25). Eleven articles met ICROMS quality criteria. Almost all studies (n=27) employed HCP-reported outcomes for training evaluation and most (n=19) additionally used patient-reported (n=12), observer-rated (n=10), standardised patient-reported (n=2) outcomes or training process and healthcare data (n=10). Most studies employed a mix of unpublished and published measures (n=17) and covered two (n=12) or three (n=10) Kirkpatrick's levels. Identified evaluation outcomes covered all categories of the proposed framework. CONCLUSIONS Strategies to evaluate HCP trainings in SDM varied largely. The proposed evaluation framework maybe useful to structure future evaluation studies, but international agreement on a core set of outcomes is needed to improve evidence. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42016041623.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evamaria Müller
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alena Strukava
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Isabelle Scholl
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Härter
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ndeye Thiab Diouf
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Angela Buchholz
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Riddle DL, Sando T, Tarver T, Slover J, Perera RA, Sierra R, Brito JP, Montori VM. Protocol for a systematic review of randomized trials of knee arthroplasty decision aids and shared decision-making approaches. Syst Rev 2019; 8:137. [PMID: 31176370 PMCID: PMC6555949 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1053-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making is an approach to making treatment-based decisions that rely on the patient encounter and clear discussions between the patient and the healthcare provider. Patients with arthritis of the knee frequently seek care, and depending on arthritis severity and impact on daily life, joint arthroplasty may be considered as a treatment option. We will conduct a systematic review of shared decision-making trials in knee arthroplasty to determine the types of shared decision-making approaches used and their impact on care received. METHODS Our systematic review will describe and critically appraise shared decision approaches used in randomized trials of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, the types of outcomes reported, and the impact of these approaches on the patients' care. We will use the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library, from inception through December 2018. Additionally, we will assess ongoing research by querying experts and searching trial registries. DISCUSSION This study will characterize shared decision-making (SDM) approaches in knee arthroplasty randomized clinical trials and will summarize their effects of SDM on clinical and patient-reported outcomes. We anticipate this review will bring to light knowledge gaps and inform further research into the design and use of shared decision-making approaches in lower extremity arthroplasty. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019123586.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel L. Riddle
- Departments of Physical Therapy, Orthopaedic Surgery and Rheumatology, West Hospital, Virginia Commonwealth University, Room B100, 1200 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23298-0224 USA
| | - Trisha Sando
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA USA
| | | | - James Slover
- New York University, Langone Medical Center, New York, NY USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ambrosini A, Quinlivan R, Sansone VA, Meijer I, Schrijvers G, Tibben A, Padberg G, de Wit M, Sterrenburg E, Mejat A, Breukel A, Rataj M, Lochmüller H, Willmann R. "Be an ambassador for change that you would like to see": a call to action to all stakeholders for co-creation in healthcare and medical research to improve quality of life of people with a neuromuscular disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2019; 14:126. [PMID: 31174585 PMCID: PMC6555994 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-019-1103-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patient and public involvement for co-creation is increasingly recognized as a valuable strategy to develop healthcare research targeting patients’ real needs. However, its practical implementation is not as advanced and unanimously accepted as it could be, due to cultural differences and complexities of managing healthcare programs and clinical studies, especially in the rare disease field. Main body The European Neuromuscular Centre, a European foundation of patient organizations, involved its key stakeholders in a special workshop to investigate the position of the neuromuscular patient community with respect to healthcare and medical research to identify and address gaps and bottlenecks. The workshop took place in Milan (Italy) on January 19–20, 2018, involving 45 participants who were mainly representatives of the patient community, but also included experts from clinical centers, industry and regulatory bodies. In order to provide practical examples and constructive suggestions, specific topics were identified upfront. The first set of issues concerned the quality of life at specific phases of a patient’s life, such as at the time of diagnosis or during pediatric to adult transition, and patient involvement in medical research on activities in daily living including patient reported outcome measures. The second set of issues concerned the involvement of patients in the management of clinical research tools, such as registries and biobanks, and their participation in study design or marketing authorization processes. Introductory presentations were followed by parallel working group sessions, to gain constructive contributions from all participants. The concept of shared decision making was used to ensure, in discussions, a partnership-based identification of the wishes and needs of all stakeholders involved, and the “ladder of participation” tool served as a model to evaluate the actual and the desired level of patients’ involvement in all topics addressed. A general consensus on the outcome of the meeting was collected during the final plenary session. This paper reports the outcome of the workshop and the specific suggestions derived from the analysis of the first set of topics, related to quality of life. The outcomes of the second set of topics are reported elsewhere and are only briefly summarized herein for the sake of completeness. Conclusions The neuromuscular community proved to be very active and engaged at different levels in the healthcare initiatives of interest. The workshop participants critically discussed several topics, providing practical examples where different stakeholders could play a role in making a change and bridging gaps. Overall, they indicated the need for education of all stakeholders for better communication, where everyone should become an ambassador to promote real change. Support should also come from institutions and healthcare bodies both at structural and economic level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Ambrosini
- Fondazione Telethon, Via Poerio 14, 20129, Milan, Italy.
| | - Ros Quinlivan
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Valeria A Sansone
- NEuroMuscular Omnicentre (NEMO), Neurorehabilitation Unit, University of Milan, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Fondazione Serena Onlus, Milan, Italy
| | - Ingeborg Meijer
- Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Spierziekten Nederland, Baarn, the Netherlands
| | | | - Aad Tibben
- Centre for Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - George Padberg
- Centre for Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten de Wit
- Department of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alexandre Mejat
- University of Lyon, University of Lyon1 Claude Bernard Lyon1, Institut NeuroMyoGene, CNRS UMR5310, INSERM U1217, Lyon, France
| | | | - Michal Rataj
- Polish Neuromuscular Diseases Association (PTCHNM), Warszawa, Poland
| | - Hanns Lochmüller
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Raffaella Willmann
- Swiss Foundation for Research on Muscle Diseases, Cortaillod, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Finnerty M, Austin E, Chen Q, Layman D, Kealey E, Ng-Mak D, Rajagopalan K, Hoagwood K. Implementation and Use of a Client-Facing Web-Based Shared Decision-Making System (MyCHOIS-CommonGround) in Two Specialty Mental Health Clinics. Community Ment Health J 2019; 55:641-650. [PMID: 30317442 PMCID: PMC6447505 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-018-0341-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Electronic shared-decision making programs may provide an assistive technology to support physician-patient communication. This mixed methods study examined use of a web-based shared decision-making program (MyCHOIS-CommonGround) by individuals receiving specialty mental health services, and identified qualitative factors influencing adoption during the first 18 months of implementation in two Medicaid mental health clinics. T-tests and χ2 analyses were conducted to assess differences in patient use between sites. Approximately 80% of patients in both clinics created a MyCHOIS-CommonGround user profile, but marked differences emerged between clinics in patients completing shared decision-making reports (79% vs. 28%, χ2(1) = 109.92, p < .01) and average number of reports (7.20 vs. 3.60, t = - 3.64, p < .01). Results suggest high penetration of computer-based programs in specialty mental health services is possible, but clinic implementation factors can influence patient use including leadership commitment, peer staff funding to support the program, and implementation strategy, most notably integration of the program within routine clinical workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Finnerty
- New York State Office of Mental Health, 330 5th Ave, New York, NY, 10001, USA.
- New York University Langone Medical Center, One Park Ave, 7th Floor, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Elizabeth Austin
- New York State Office of Mental Health, 330 5th Ave, New York, NY, 10001, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th Street, Box 354808, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Qingxian Chen
- New York State Office of Mental Health, 75 New Scotland Ave, CDPC Unit R, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Deborah Layman
- New York State Office of Mental Health, 330 5th Ave, New York, NY, 10001, USA
| | - Edith Kealey
- New York State Office of Mental Health, 330 5th Ave, New York, NY, 10001, USA
- NYC Department of Social Services, 150 Greenwich St., 42nd Floor, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daisy Ng-Mak
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., 84 Waterford Drive, Marlborough, MA, 01752, USA
| | | | - Kimberly Hoagwood
- New York University Langone Medical Center, One Park Ave, 7th Floor, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Scalia P, Durand MA, Berkowitz JL, Ramesh NP, Faber MJ, Kremer JAM, Elwyn G. The impact and utility of encounter patient decision aids: Systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:817-841. [PMID: 30612829 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 11/23/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of encounter patient decision aids (PDAs) as evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and conduct a narrative synthesis of non-randomized studies assessing feasibility, utility and their integration into clinical workflows. METHODS Databases were systematically searched for RCTs of encounter PDAs to enable the conduct of a meta-analysis. We used a framework analysis approach to conduct a narrative synthesis of non-randomized studies. RESULTS We included 23 RCTs and 30 non-randomized studies. Encounter PDAs significantly increased knowledge (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI 0.30, 0.55), lowered decisional conflict (SMD= -0.33; 95% CI -0.56, -0.09), increased observational-based assessment of shared decision making (SMD = 0.94; 95% CI 0.40, 1.48) and satisfaction with the decision-making process (OR = 1.78; 95% CI 1.19, 2.66) without increasing visit durations (SMD= -0.06; 95% CI -0.29, 0.16). The narrative synthesis showed that encounter tools have high utility for patients and clinicians, yet important barriers to implementation exist (i.e. time constraints) at the clinical and organizational level. CONCLUSION Encounter PDAs have a positive impact on patient-clinician collaboration, despite facing implementation barriers. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS The potential utility of encounter PDAs requires addressing the systemic and structural barriers that prevent adoption in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Scalia
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
| | - Julia L Berkowitz
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
| | - Nithya P Ramesh
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
| | - Marjan J Faber
- Radboud university medical center, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500, HB, the Netherlands.
| | - Jan A M Kremer
- Radboud university medical center, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500, HB, the Netherlands.
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Alzubaidi H, Hussein A, Mc Namara K, Scholl I. Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire: the entire process from translation to validation. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026672. [PMID: 30948608 PMCID: PMC6500381 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Revised: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To translate the German 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) to Arabic and assess its psychometric properties for measuring Arabic-speaking patients' perceptions of the shared decision-making (SDM) process. DESIGN Multicentre cross-sectional study. SETTING Secondary healthcare settings; outpatient clinics of 10 major hospitals were selected in four emirates in the United Arab Emirates (Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharjah and Umm Al Quwain). PARTICIPANTS Patients with chronic diseases who attended outpatient clinics of participating hospitals. MEASUREMENTS The original German SDM-Q-9 was translated to Arabic. International multiphase translation guidelines and the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-reported measures were used. Various psychometric properties were assessed, including reliability (internal consistency), and construct validity (exploratory factor analysis [EFA] and confirmatory factor analysis [CFA]). RESULTS The final Arabic version of the SDM-Q-9 was tested among 516 secondary care patients. Internal consistency yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.929 for the whole scale. EFA showed a one-factorial solution, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.907 and Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (χ2=3413.69, df=36, p<0.0005). For the CFA, two different models were tested; Model 1 included the nine items and Model 2 was monofactorial that included items 2-9 and thus excluded item 1. Both models were adequate as they produced similar indices. CONCLUSIONS The Arabic version of SDM-Q-9 showed excellent reliability and acceptable validity parameters among secondary care patients. The newly translated Arabic questionnaire is the first psychometrically tested tool that can be used in the 22 member states of the Arab league to assess patients' perspectives on the SDM process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamzah Alzubaidi
- College of Pharmacy, Sharjah Institute for Medical Research, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Amal Hussein
- Family and Community Medicine & Behavioral Sciences, University of Sharjah, College of Medicine, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Isabelle Scholl
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gornick MC, Ryan KA, Scherer AM, Roberts JS, De Vries RG, Uhlmann WR. Interpretations of the Term "Actionable" when Discussing Genetic Test Results: What you Mean Is Not What I Heard. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:334-342. [PMID: 30964581 PMCID: PMC10558004 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0289-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In genomic medicine, the familiarity and inexactness of the term "actionable" can lead to multiple interpretations and mistaken beliefs about realistic treatment options. As part of a larger study focusing on public attitudes toward policies for the return of secondary genomic results, we looked at how members of the lay public interpret the term "medically actionable" in the context of genetic testing. We also surveyed a convenience sample of oncologists as part of a separate study and asked them to define the term "medically actionable." After being provided with a definition of the term, 21 out of 60 (35%) layperson respondents wrote an additional action not specified in the provided definition (12 mentioned "cure" and 9 mentioned environment or behavioral change) and 17 (28%) indicated "something can be done" with no action specified. In contrast, 52 surveyed oncologists did not mention environment, behavioral change, or cure. Based on our findings, we propose that rather than using the term "actionable" alone, providers should also say "what they mean" to reduce miscommunication and confusion that could negatively impact medical decision-making. Lastly, to guide clinicians during patient- provider discussion about genetic test results, we provide examples of phrasing to facilitate clearer communication and understanding of the term "actionable."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele C. Gornick
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Kerry A. Ryan
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Aaron M. Scherer
- University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Iowa City, IA
| | - J. Scott Roberts
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Raymond G. De Vries
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Wendy R. Uhlmann
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|