1
|
Gongora-Salazar P, Perera R, Rivero-Arias O, Tsiachristas A. Unravelling Elements of Value of Healthcare and Assessing their Importance Using Evidence from Two Discrete-Choice Experiments in England. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024:10.1007/s40273-024-01416-5. [PMID: 39085565 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01416-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health systems are moving towards value-based care, implementing new care models that allegedly aim beyond patient outcomes. Therefore, a policy and academic debate is underway regarding the definition of value in healthcare, the inclusion of costs in value metrics, and the importance of each value element. This study aimed to define healthcare value elements and assess their relative importance (RI) to the public in England. METHOD Using data from 26 semi-structured interviews and a literature review, and applying decision-theory axioms, we selected a comprehensive and applicable set of value-based elements. Their RI was determined using two discrete choice experiments (DCEs) based on Bayesian D-efficient DCE designs, with one DCE incorporating healthcare costs expressed as income tax rise. Respondent preferences were analysed using mixed logit models. RESULTS Six value elements were identified: additional life-years, health-related quality of life, patient experience, target population size, equity, and cost. The DCE surveys were completed by 402 participants. All utility coefficients had the expected signs and were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Additional life-years (25.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 22.5-28.6%) and patient experience (25.2%; 95% CI 21.6-28.9%) received the highest RI, followed by target population size (22.4%; 95% CI 19.1-25.6%) and quality of life (17.6%; 95% CI 15.0-20.3%). Equity had the lowest RI (9.6%; 95% CI 6.4-12.1%), decreasing by 8.8 percentage points with cost inclusion. A similar reduction was observed in the RI of quality of life when cost was included. CONCLUSION The public prioritizes value elements not captured by conventional metrics, such as quality-adjusted life-years. Although cost inclusion did not alter the preference ranking, its inclusion in the value metric warrants careful consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Gongora-Salazar
- Social Protection and Health Division, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, Health Economics Research Centre (HERC), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Rafael Perera
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Oliver Rivero-Arias
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, Health Economics Research Centre (HERC), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Apostolos Tsiachristas
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Powell PA, Rowen D, Keetharuth A, Mukuria C, Shah K. Who should value children's health and how? An international Delphi study. Soc Sci Med 2024; 355:117127. [PMID: 39019000 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
Valuing child health necessitates normative methodological decisions on whose preferences should be elicited and who should be imagined as experiencing impaired health. Formal guidance is limited and expert consensus unclear. This study sought to establish the degree of consensus among expert stakeholders on normative issues of who to ask and who should be imagined when valuing child health (7-17 years) to inform UK health technology assessment. Sixty-two experts (n = 47 in Round 2) from 18 countries participated in a modified, two-round online Delphi survey (Round 1: May-June 2023; Round 2: September-October 2023). Participants were expert stakeholders in child health valuation, including academics (n = 38); industry/consultancy representatives (including the charity/not-for-profit sector; n = 13); and UK policy/government representatives (n = 11). The Delphi survey was modified between rounds and consisted of 9-point Likert, categorical, multiple-choice, and free-text questions on normative issues in valuing child health. Responses were analysed descriptively and thematically. An a priori criterion of ≥75% agreement was established for formal consensus, while areas approaching consensus (≥70% agreement) and without consensus were identified as a future research primer. Consensus was observed that older adolescents (aged 16-17 years) and adults (18+ years) should be asked to value child health states. There was consensus that the former should think about themselves when valuing the health states and the latter should imagine a child of some form (e.g., imagining themselves as a child or another hypothetical child). However, no consensus was evident on what form this should take. Several other methodological issues also reached consensus. These findings are largely consistent with recent views elicited qualitatively from members of the public and other stakeholders on normative issues in valuing child health. The results mean that, contrary to what has been done in previous child health valuation studies, efforts should be made to involve both older adolescents (16+ years) and adults in child health valuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip A Powell
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK.
| | - Donna Rowen
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Anju Keetharuth
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Koonal Shah
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Espirito Santo CM, Miyamoto GC, Santos VS, Ben ÂJ, Finch AP, Roudijk B, de Jesus-Moraleida FR, Stein AT, Santos M, Yamato TP. Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for Brazil. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024:10.1007/s40273-024-01404-9. [PMID: 38954389 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01404-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The EQ-5D-Y-3L is a generic measure of health-related quality of life in children and adolescents. Although the Brazilian-Portuguese EQ-5D-Y-3L version is available, there is no value set for it, hampering its use in economic evaluations. This study aimed to elicit a Brazilian EQ-5D-Y-3L value set based on preferences of the general adult population. METHODS Two independent samples of adults participated in an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey and a composite time trade-off (cTTO) face-to-face interview. The framing was "considering your views for a 10-year-old child". DCE data were analyzed using a mixed-logit model. The 243 DCE predicted values were mapped into the observed 28 cTTO values using linear and non-linear mapping approaches with and without intercept. Mapping approaches' performance was assessed to estimate the most valid method to rescale DCE predicted values using the model fit (R2), Akaike Information Criteria (AIC), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). RESULTS A representative sample of 1376 Brazilian adults participated (DCE, 1152; cTTO, 211). The linear mapping without intercept (R2 = 96%; AIC, - 44; RMSE, 0.0803; MAE, - 0.0479) outperformed the non-linear without intercept (R2 = 98%; AIC, - 63; RMSE, 0.1385; MAE, - 0.1320). Utilities ranged from 1 (full health) to - 0.0059 (the worst health state). Highest weights were assigned to having pain or discomfort (pain/discomfort), followed by walking about (mobility), looking after myself (self-care), doing usual activities (usual activities), and feeling worried, sad, or unhappy (anxiety/depression). CONCLUSION This study elicited the Brazilian EQ-5D-Y-3L value set using a mixed-logit DCE model with a power parameter based on a linear mapping without intercept, which can be used to estimate the quality-adjusted life-years for economic evaluations of health technologies targeting the Brazilian youth population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caique Melo Espirito Santo
- Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Rua Cesário Galeno, 448/475, Tatuapé, São Paulo, 03071-000, Brazil
| | - Gisela Cristiane Miyamoto
- Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Rua Cesário Galeno, 448/475, Tatuapé, São Paulo, 03071-000, Brazil
| | - Verônica Souza Santos
- Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Rua Cesário Galeno, 448/475, Tatuapé, São Paulo, 03071-000, Brazil
| | - Ângela Jornada Ben
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bram Roudijk
- EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Airton Tetelbom Stein
- Department of Public Health, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Marisa Santos
- Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Tiê Parma Yamato
- Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Rua Cesário Galeno, 448/475, Tatuapé, São Paulo, 03071-000, Brazil.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ungar WJ, Herdman M. Meeting the Challenges of Preference-Weighted Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measurement in Children. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:3-8. [PMID: 38722540 PMCID: PMC11169046 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01383-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy J Ungar
- Program of Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Michael Herdman
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xie F, Xie S, Pullenayegum E, Ohinmaa A. Understanding Canadian stakeholders' views on measuring and valuing health for children and adolescents: a qualitative study. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:1415-1422. [PMID: 38438665 PMCID: PMC11045599 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03618-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Valuing child health is critical to assessing the value of healthcare interventions for children. However, there remain important methodological and normative issues. This qualitative study aimed to understand the views of Canadian stakeholders on these issues. METHODS Stakeholders from health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, pharmaceutical industry representatives, healthcare providers, and academic researchers/scholars were invited to attend an online interview. Semi-structured interviews were designed to focus on: (1) comparing the 3-level and 5-level versions of the EQ-5D-Y; (2) source of preferences for valuation (adults vs. children); (3) perspective of valuation tasks; and (4) methods for valuation (discrete choice experiment [DCE] and its variants versus time trade-off [TTO]). Participants were probed to consider HTA guidelines, cognitive capacity, and potential ethical concerns. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Framework analysis with the incidence density method was used to analyze the data. RESULTS Fifteen interviews were conducted between May and September 2022. 66.7% (N = 10) of participants had experience with economic evaluations, and 86.7% (N = 13) were parents. Eleven participants preferred the EQ-5D-Y-5L. 12 participants suggested that adolescents should be directly involved in child health valuation from their own perspective. The participants were split on the ethical concerns. Eight participants did not think that there was ethical concern. 11 participants preferred DCE to TTO. Among the DCE variants, 6 participants preferred the DCE with duration to the DCE with death. CONCLUSIONS Most Canadian stakeholders supported eliciting the preferences of adolescents directly from their own perspective for child health valuation. DCE was preferred if adolescents are directly involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Xie
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
| | - Shitong Xie
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Eleanor Pullenayegum
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Arto Ohinmaa
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Powell PA, Rowen D, Keetharuth A, Mukuria C. Understanding UK public views on normative decisions made to value health-related quality of life in children: A qualitative study. Soc Sci Med 2024; 340:116506. [PMID: 38104438 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Developing methodology for measuring and valuing child health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a priority for health technology agencies. One aspect of this is normative decisions that are made in child HRQoL valuation. This qualitative study aimed to better understand adult public opinion on the normative questions of whose preferences to elicit (adults, children, or both) and from which perspective (who should be imagined living in impaired health), when valuing child HRQoL. Opinions of the adult UK public (N = 32) were solicited using online semi-structured focus groups, featuring a breadth of age, sex, ethnicities, and responsibility for children under 18 years. Participants were provided with bespoke informational material on health state valuation and were probed for their views. Arguments for and against different positions were discussed. Data was analysed using framework analysis. Participants demonstrated near-to-universal agreement that children should be involved in valuation in some form, yet this should differ depending on age or maturity. There was strong support for approaches combining involvement from children and adults (e.g., their parents), especially for younger children. There was little intuitive support for the 'taxpayer argument' for asking taxpaying adults. In the context of greater involvement of children in valuation, most participants supported using an 'own' perspective. Most participants thought that valuation study participants should know the exercise is about valuing child health states for ethical reasons. Informed views from the UK public on who should be asked and with what perspective when valuing child HRQoL appear to differ from normative positions previously advocated by some health economists, such as prioritising the preferences of taxpaying adults. In contrast, the results suggest including adults and children in valuation, with the proviso that the children are of an appropriate age and level of maturity, and that an own perspective is used wherever possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip A Powell
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK.
| | - Donna Rowen
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Anju Keetharuth
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Essers B, Wang P, Stolk E, Jonker MF, Evers S, Joore M, Dirksen C. An investigation of age dependency in Dutch and Chinese values for EQ-5D-Y. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1175402. [PMID: 37860294 PMCID: PMC10583565 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1175402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims The primary aim was to explore the age dependency of health state values derived via trade-offs between health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and life years in a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The secondary aim was to explore if people weigh life years and HRQoL differently for children, adolescents, adults, and older adults. Methods Participants from the general population of the Netherlands and China first completed a series of choice tasks offering choices between two EQ-5D-Y states with a given lifespan. The choice model captured the value of a year in full health, disutility determined by EQ-5D-Y, and a discount rate. Next, they received a slightly different choice task, offering choices between two lives that differed in HRQoL and life expectancy but produced the same number of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Participants were randomly assigned to fill out the survey for three or four age frames: a hypothetical person of 10, 15, 40, and 70 years (the last one only applicable to China) to allow the age dependency of the responses to be explored. Results A total of 1,234 Dutch and 1,818 Chinese people administered the survey. Controlling for time preferences, we found that the agreement of health state values for different age frames was generally stronger in the Netherlands than in China. We found no clear pattern of differences in the QALY composition in both samples. The probability distribution over response options varied most when levels for lifespan or severity were at the extremes of the spectrum. Conclusion/discussion The magnitude and direction of age effects on values seemed dimension- and country specific. In the Netherlands, we found a few differences in dimension-specific weights elicited for 10- and 15-year-olds compared to 40-year-olds, but the overall age dependency of values was limited. A stronger age dependency of values was observed in China, where values for 70-year-olds differed strongly from the values for other ages. The appropriateness of using existing values beyond the age range for which they were measured needs to be evaluated in the local context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigitte Essers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Pei Wang
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Elly Stolk
- EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marcel F. Jonker
- Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Silvia Evers
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Manuela Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Carmen Dirksen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yu A, Luo Y, Bahrampour M, Norman R, Street D, Viney R, Devlin N, Mulhern BJ. Understanding the valuation of paediatric health-related quality of life: a qualitative study protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073039. [PMID: 37532476 PMCID: PMC10401228 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is evidence from previous studies that adults value paediatric health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adult HRQoL differently. Less is known about how adolescents value paediatric HRQoL and whether their valuation and decision-making processes differ from those of adults. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are widely used to develop value sets for measures of HRQoL, but there is still much to understand about whether and how the methods choices in the implementation of DCE valuation tasks, such as format, presentation and perspective, affect the decision-making process of participants. This paper describes the protocol for a qualitative study that aims to explore the decision-making process of adults and adolescents when completing DCE valuation tasks. The study will also explore the impact of methodological choices in the design of DCE studies (including decisions about format and presentation) on participants' thinking process. METHODS AND ANALYSIS An interview protocol has been developed using DCE valuation tasks. Interviews will be conducted online via Zoom with both an adolescent and adult sample. In the interview, the participant will be asked to go through some DCE valuation tasks while 'thinking aloud'. After completion of the survey, participants will then be asked some predetermined questions in relation to various aspects of the DCE tasks. Interviews will be recorded and transcribed and analysed using a thematic analysis approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval for this study has been received for the adult sample (UTS ETH20-9632) as well as the youth sample (UTS ETH22-6970) from the University of Technology Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee. Results from this study will inform the methods to be used in development of value sets for use in the health technology assessment of paediatric interventions and treatments. Findings from this study will also be disseminated through national/international conferences and peer-reviewed journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Yu
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yiting Luo
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mina Bahrampour
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Deborah Street
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nancy Devlin
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brendan James Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jiang R, Pullenayegum E, Shaw JW, Mühlbacher A, Lee TA, Walton S, Kohlmann T, Norman R, Pickard AS. Comparison of Preferences and Data Quality between Discrete Choice Experiments Conducted in Online and Face-to-Face Respondents. Med Decis Making 2023; 43:667-679. [PMID: 37199407 PMCID: PMC10422849 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231171912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Discrete choice experiments (DCE) are increasingly being conducted using online panels. However, the comparability of such DCE-based preferences to traditional modes of data collection (e.g., in-person) is not well established. In this study, supervised, face-to-face DCE was compared with its unsupervised, online facsimile on face validity, respondent behavior, and modeled preferences. METHODS Data from face-to-face and online EQ-5D-5L health state valuation studies were compared, in which each used the same experimental design and quota sampling procedure. Respondents completed 7 binary DCE tasks comparing 2 EQ-5D-5L health states presented side by side (health states A and B). Data face validity was assessed by comparing preference patterns as a function of the severity difference between 2 health states within a task. The prevalence of potentially suspicious choice patterns (i.e., all As, all Bs, and alternating As/Bs) was compared between studies. Preference data were modeled using multinomial logit regression and compared based on dimensional contribution to overall scale and importance ranking of dimension-levels. RESULTS One thousand five Online respondents and 1,099 face-to-face screened (F2FS) respondents were included in the main comparison of DCE tasks. Online respondents reported more problems on all EQ-5D dimensions except for Mobility. The face validity of the data was similar between comparators. Online respondents had a greater prevalence of potentially suspicious DCE choice patterns ([Online]: 5.3% [F2FS] 2.9%, P = 0.005). When modeled, the relative contribution of each EQ-5D dimension differed between modes of administration. Online respondents weighed Mobility more importantly and Anxiety/Depression less importantly. DISCUSSION Although assessments of face validity were similar between Online and F2FS, modeled preferences differed. Future analyses are needed to clarify whether differences are attributable to preference or data quality variation between modes of data collection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruixuan Jiang
- Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA
| | | | - James W. Shaw
- Patient-reported Outcomes Assessment, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Axel Mühlbacher
- Duke Department of Population Health Sciences and Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA, Germany
| | - Todd A. Lee
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes, and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Surrey Walton
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes, and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Thomas Kohlmann
- Institute for Community Medicine, Medical University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Richard Norman
- Curtin University School of Public Health, Perth, Australia
| | - A. Simon Pickard
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes, and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yang Z, Jiang J, Wang P, Wu J, Fang Y, Feng D, Xi X, Luo N. Using Time Trade-Off Values to Estimate EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: An Exploratory Study. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:968-973. [PMID: 36921897 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The published international EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation protocol does not recommend the composite time trade-off (cTTO) method as the primary valuation method because of 2 major concerns. First, the cTTO method was shown to generate high values. Second, the cTTO method is not as feasible for valuing children's health as other established methods. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of using cTTO values alone to estimate EQ-5D-Y-3L value sets. METHODS We analyzed the cTTO data derived from the recently completed Chinese EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation study in which a total of 28 health states were valued. We assessed the feasibility of the cTTO tasks in terms of survey completion time and participant-reported difficulty of understanding the task, differentiating the health states, and deciding the answer. We also examined the data distribution characteristics and modeled the data using different models. RESULTS In total, 418 participants completed the cTTO interview. On average, participants took approximately 35.70 minutes (SD 12.42) to complete the interview and made 13.21 moves (SD 9.00) in the cTTO tasks. There were 74.16%, 59.33%, and 11.48% of participants indicated that it was easy to understand the cTTO tasks, easy to differentiate between the health states, and difficult to decide on an indifference point, respectively. The data distribution was smooth, and a random-effects model performed the best in terms of coefficient significance, monotonicity, and predictive accuracy. CONCLUSION Our finding suggests that estimating EQ-5D-Y-3L value sets using cTTO data alone is feasible and therefore could be considered as an option in future valuation studies for EQ-5D-Y-3L.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhihao Yang
- Health Services Management Department, Guizhou Medical University, Gui'an, China; College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jie Jiang
- College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei Wang
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Wu
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yu Fang
- Department of Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Da Feng
- School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaoyu Xi
- The Research Center of National Drug Policy & Ecosystem, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang H, Rowen DL, Brazier JE, Jiang L. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health State Valuation: A Systematic Review of Progress and New Trends. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:405-418. [PMID: 36997744 PMCID: PMC10062300 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00794-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly used in health state valuation studies. OBJECTIVE This systematic review updates the progress and new findings of DCE studies in the health state valuation, covering the period since the review of June 2018 to November 2022. The review reports the methods that are currently being used in DCE studies to value health and study design characteristics, and, for the first time, reviews DCE health state valuation studies published in the Chinese language. METHODS English language databases PubMed and Cochrane, and Chinese language databases Wanfang and CNKI were searched using the self-developed search terms. Health state valuation or methodology study papers were included if the study used DCE data to generate a value set for a preference-based measure. Key information extracted included DCE study design strategies applied, methods for anchoring the latent coefficient on to a 0-1 QALY scale and data analysis methods. RESULTS Sixty-five studies were included; one Chinese language publication and 64 English language publications. The number of health state valuation studies using DCE has rapidly increased in recent years and these have been conducted in more countries than prior to 2018. Wide usage of DCE with duration attributes, D-efficient design and models accounting for heterogeneity has continued in recent years. Although more methodological consensus has been found than in studies conducted prior to 2018, this consensus may be driven by valuation studies for common measures with an international protocol (the 'model' valuation research). Valuing long measures with well-being attributes attracted attention and more realistic design strategies (e.g., inconstant time preference, efficient design and implausible states design) were identified. However, more qualitative and quantitative methodology study is still necessary to evaluate the effect of those new methods. CONCLUSIONS The use of DCEs in health state valuation continues to grow dramatically and the methodology progress makes the method more reliable and pragmatic. However, study design is driven by international protocols and method selection is not always justified. There is no gold standard for DCE design, presentation format or anchoring method. More qualitative and quantitative methodology study is recommended to evaluate the effect of new methods before researchers make methodology decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haode Wang
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield City Centre, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Donna L Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield City Centre, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - John E Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield City Centre, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Litian Jiang
- Health Policy Research Unit, Shenzhen Health Development Research and Data Management Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lipman SA, Zhang L, Shah KK, Attema AE. Time and lexicographic preferences in the valuation of EQ-5D-Y with time trade-off methodology. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2023; 24:293-305. [PMID: 35596831 PMCID: PMC9123877 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01466-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
In the valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L, adult respondents are asked to complete composite time trade-off (cTTO) tasks for a 10-year-old child. Earlier work has shown that cTTO utilities elicited in such a child perspective are generally higher than when adults take their own perspective. We explore how differences in time preference in child and adult perspectives could explain this effect. Furthermore, as cTTO valuation in a child perspective involves explicit consideration of immediate death for a child, we also consider how cTTO utilities could be affected by decision-makers lexicographically avoiding death in children. We report the results of an experiment in which 219 respondents valued 5 health states in both adult and child perspectives with either a standard cTTO or a lead-time TTO only approach, in which immediate death is less focal. Time preferences were measured in both perspectives. Our results suggest that utilities were lower when lead-time TTO, rather than cTTO, was used. We find large heterogeneity in time preference in both perspectives, with predominantly negative time preference. The influence of time preferences on utilities, however, was small, and correcting for time preferences did not reduce differences between utilities elicited in both perspectives. Surprisingly, we found more evidence for differences in utilities between adult and child perspectives when lead-time TTO was used. Overall, these results suggest that time and lexicographic preferences affect time trade-off valuation in child and adult perspectives, but are not the explanation for differences between these perspectives. We discuss the implications of our findings for EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan A Lipman
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Liying Zhang
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koonal K Shah
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- PHMR Ltd, London, UK
| | - Arthur E Attema
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lipman SA, Zhang L, Shah KK, Attema AE. Time and lexicographic preferences in the valuation of EQ-5D-Y with time trade-off methodology. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2023; 24:293-305. [PMID: 35596831 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01466-6:1-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
In the valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L, adult respondents are asked to complete composite time trade-off (cTTO) tasks for a 10-year-old child. Earlier work has shown that cTTO utilities elicited in such a child perspective are generally higher than when adults take their own perspective. We explore how differences in time preference in child and adult perspectives could explain this effect. Furthermore, as cTTO valuation in a child perspective involves explicit consideration of immediate death for a child, we also consider how cTTO utilities could be affected by decision-makers lexicographically avoiding death in children. We report the results of an experiment in which 219 respondents valued 5 health states in both adult and child perspectives with either a standard cTTO or a lead-time TTO only approach, in which immediate death is less focal. Time preferences were measured in both perspectives. Our results suggest that utilities were lower when lead-time TTO, rather than cTTO, was used. We find large heterogeneity in time preference in both perspectives, with predominantly negative time preference. The influence of time preferences on utilities, however, was small, and correcting for time preferences did not reduce differences between utilities elicited in both perspectives. Surprisingly, we found more evidence for differences in utilities between adult and child perspectives when lead-time TTO was used. Overall, these results suggest that time and lexicographic preferences affect time trade-off valuation in child and adult perspectives, but are not the explanation for differences between these perspectives. We discuss the implications of our findings for EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan A Lipman
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Liying Zhang
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koonal K Shah
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- PHMR Ltd, London, UK
| | - Arthur E Attema
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Xiong X, Dalziel K, Huang L, Rivero-Arias O. Test-Retest Reliability of EQ-5D-Y-3L Best-Worst Scaling Choices of Adolescents and Adults. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:50-54. [PMID: 35970707 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an increasing interest to obtain adolescents' own health state valuation preferences and to understand how these differ from adult preferences for the same health state. An important question in health state valuation is whether adolescents can report preferences reliably, yet research remains limited. OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate the test-retest reliability of best-worst scaling (BWS) to elicit adolescent preferences compared with adults. METHODS Identical BWS tasks designed to value 3-level version of EQ-5D-Y health states were administered online in samples of 1000 adolescents (aged 11-17 years) and 1006 adults in Spain. The valuation survey was repeated approximately 3 days later. We calculated (1) simple percentage agreement and (2) kappa statistic as measures of test-retest reliability. We also compared BWS marginal frequencies and relative attribute importance between baseline and follow-up to explore similarities in the obtained preferences. RESULTS We found that both adolescents and adults were able to report their preferences with moderate reliability (kappa: 0.46 for adolescents, 0.46 for adults) for best choices and fair to moderate reliability (kappa: 0.39 for adolescents, 0.41 for adults) for worst choices. No notable difference was observed across years of child age. Higher consistency was observed for best choices than worst in some dimensions for both populations. No significant differences were found in the relative attribute importance between baseline and follow-up in both populations. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that BWS is a reliable elicitation technique to value 3-level version of EQ-5D-Y health states in both adolescents and adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuqin Xiong
- Health Economics Unit, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kim Dalziel
- Health Economics Unit, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Li Huang
- Health Economics Unit, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Oliver Rivero-Arias
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Elliott J, Tsuchiya A. Do they just know more, or do they also have different preferences? An exploratory analysis of the effects of self-reporting serious health problems on health state valuation. Soc Sci Med 2022; 315:115474. [PMID: 36442314 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health state valuation is often conducted by people valuing either only their own health state (experience-based valuation) or several stylised states (hypothetical valuation). The approach used can affect the elicited values, but it is not clear whether this is caused by different understandings of the states (an "information mechanism") and/or by different opinions of the states (a "preference mechanism"). Justifying privileging the valuations of those with the relevant health state experience solely because they are better informed is insufficient when their opinions differ. This study proposes a new framework to examine the effect of having health problems on health state valuation by distinguishing "within-dimensional" effects (which can be due to better information or due to differences in opinion) and "cross-dimensional" effects (which must be due to differences in opinion). METHODS Secondary data from the UK that valued EQ-5D-5L using Discrete Choice Experiments with duration (DCETTO) are remodelled controlling for whether a respondent self-reports serious (viz., severe or extreme) problems in "pain or discomfort" (PD) or "anxiety or depression" (AD). The main analysis uses respondents who have serious PD or serious AD alongside matched respondents who do not, and assumes constant proportional time trade-off. RESULTS Self-reporting serious PD or serious AD problems has no within-dimensional effect on health state preferences. However, self-reporting serious AD problems has negative cross-dimensional effects on the utility of having any problem in PD, which suggests that the preference mechanism is present. A similar pattern holds when all available (unmatched) data are used and when constant proportional time trade-off is relaxed. CONCLUSIONS Findings consistent with the preference mechanism indicate that those with serious health problems may have different opinions on the value of health states compared to the rest of the population, which has normative implications for the debate on which values to use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Elliott
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Aki Tsuchiya
- Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Devlin N, Roudijk B, Viney R, Stolk E. EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Sets, Valuation Methods and Conceptual Questions. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:123-127. [PMID: 36504378 PMCID: PMC9758242 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01226-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Devlin
- Health Economics Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Bram Roudijk
- CHERE, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Scientific Team, EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elly Stolk
- CHERE, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lipman SA, Essers BAB, Finch AP, Sajjad A, Stalmeier PFM, Roudijk B. In a Child's Shoes: Composite Time Trade-Off Valuations for EQ-5D-Y-3L with Different Proxy Perspectives. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:181-192. [PMID: 36255560 PMCID: PMC9579618 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01202-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES EQ-5D-Y-3L health states are commonly valued by asking adults to complete stated preference tasks, 'given their views about a 10-year-old child' (hereafter referred to as proxy 1). The use of this perspective has been a source of debate. In this paper, we investigated an alternative proxy perspective: i.e. adults considered what they think a 10-year old-child would decide for itself (hereafter, proxy 2 (substitute)]. Our main objective was to explore how the outcomes, dispersion and response patterns of a composite time trade-off valuation differ between proxy 1 and proxy 2. METHODS A team of four trained interviewers completed 402 composite time trade-off interviews following the EQ-5D-Y-3L protocol. Respondents were randomly allocated to value health states in either the proxy 1 or proxy 2 (substitute) perspective. Each respondent valued ten health states with the perspective they were assigned to, as well as one health state with the alternative perspective (33333). RESULTS The use of different proxy perspectives yielded differences in EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation. For states in which children had considerable pain and were very worried, sad or unhappy, respondents' valuations were lower in proxy 1 than in proxy 2 (substitute) perspectives, by about 0.2. Within-subject variation across health states was lower for proxy 2 (substitute) than proxy 1 perspectives. Analyses of response patterns suggest that data for proxy 2 (substitute) perspectives were less clustered. CONCLUSIONS There are systematic differences between composite time trade-off responses given by adults deciding for children and adults considering what children would want for themselves. In addition to warranting further qualitative exploration, such differences contribute to the ongoing normative discussion surrounding the source and perspective used for valuation of child and adolescent health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan A Lipman
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Brigitte A B Essers
- CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ayesha Sajjad
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peep F M Stalmeier
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bram Roudijk
- EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rencz F, Ruzsa G, Bató A, Yang Z, Finch AP, Brodszky V. Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L in Hungary. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:205-215. [PMID: 36123448 PMCID: PMC9485017 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01190-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Hungarian health technology assessment guidelines recommend the use of the EuroQol instrument family in quality-adjusted life-year calculations. However, no national value set exists for the EQ-5D-Y-3L or any other youth-specific instrument. OBJECTIVE This study aims to develop a national value set of the EQ-5D-Y-3L for Hungary based on preferences of the general adult population. METHODS This study followed the international valuation protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L. Two independent samples, representative of the Hungarian general adult population in terms of age and sex were recruited to complete online discrete choice experiment (DCE) tasks and composite time trade-off (cTTO) tasks by computer-assisted personal interviews. Adults valued hypothetical EQ-5D-Y-3L health states considering the health of a 10-year-old child. DCE data were modelled using a mixed logit model with random-correlated coefficients. Latent DCE utility estimates were mapped onto mean observed cTTO utilities using ordinary least squares regression. RESULTS Overall, 996 and 200 respondents completed the DCE and cTTO surveys, respectively. For each domain, the value set resulted in larger utility decrements with more severe response levels. The relative importance of domains by level 3 coefficients was as follows: having pain or discomfort > feeling worried, sad or unhappy > mobility > doing usual activities > looking after myself. Overall, 12.3% of all health states had negative utilities in the value set, with the worst health state having the lowest predicted utility of - 0.485. CONCLUSION This study developed a national value set of the EQ-5D-Y-3L for Hungary. The value set enables to evaluate the cost utility of health technologies for children and adolescents based on societal preferences in Hungary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanni Rencz
- Department of Health Policy, Corvinus University of Budapest, 8 Fővám tér, 1093, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Gábor Ruzsa
- Department of Statistics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
- Doctoral School of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Alex Bató
- Department of Health Policy, Corvinus University of Budapest, 8 Fővám tér, 1093, Budapest, Hungary
- Károly Rácz Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zhihao Yang
- Health Services Management Department, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | | | - Valentin Brodszky
- Department of Health Policy, Corvinus University of Budapest, 8 Fővám tér, 1093, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mott DJ, Devlin NJ, Kreimeier S, Norman R, Shah KK, Rivero-Arias O. Analytical Considerations When Anchoring Discrete Choice Experiment Values Using Composite Time Trade-Off Data: The Case of EQ-5D-Y-3L. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:129-137. [PMID: 36396877 PMCID: PMC9758092 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01214-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are becoming increasingly used to elicit preferences for children's health states. However, DCE data need to be anchored to produce value sets, and composite time trade-off (cTTO) data are typically used in the context of EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation. The objective of this paper is to compare different anchoring methods, summarise the characteristics of the value sets they produce, and outline key considerations for analysts. Three anchoring methods were compared using data from published studies: (1) rescaling using the mean value for the worst health state; (2) linear mapping; and (3) hybrid modelling. The worst state rescaling value set had the largest range. The worst state rescaling and linear mapping value sets preserved the relative importance of the dimensions from the DCE, whereas the hybrid model value set did not. Overall, the predicted values from the hybrid model value set were more closely aligned with the cTTO values. These findings are relatively generalisable. Deciding upon which anchoring approach to use is challenging, as there are numerous considerations. Where cTTO data are collected for more than one health state, anchoring on the worst health state will arguably be suboptimal. However, the final choice of approach may require value judgements to be made. Researchers should seek input from relevant stakeholders when commencing valuation studies to help guide decisions and should clearly set out their rationale for their preferred anchoring approach in study outputs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nancy J Devlin
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Simone Kreimeier
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Richard Norman
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Koonal K Shah
- National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
| | - Oliver Rivero-Arias
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nazari JL, Pickard AS, Gu NY. Findings from a Roundtable Discussion with US Stakeholders on Valuation of the EQ-5D-Y-3L. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:139-146. [PMID: 36443519 PMCID: PMC9758239 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01222-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The International Valuation Protocol for the valuation of the EQ-5D-Y-3L provides baseline guidance, but country-specific context is also important. This study aimed to obtain US stakeholders' input on key considerations for youth valuation in the US. METHODS A total of 14 stakeholders representing various backgrounds were identified via the investigators' networks. A 2-h online meeting was held to discuss (1) the need for a US value set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L; (2) willingness to pay more for quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gains for children versus adults; (3) sampling strategies; (4) framing perspectives; and (5) other challenges. The session was recorded, transcribed, and summarized. RESULTS Several stakeholders supported paying more for QALY gains for children in recognition of their potential future contributions to society, as well as to avoid potential undervaluation and promote access to innovative treatments. Concerns regarding possible double counting, lack of data to showcase long-term benefits, and dangers of paying more for certain subgroups were also expressed. Most of the stakeholders felt that adolescents could relate to a 10-year-old's perspective better than adults and were capable of self-completing valuation tasks, and thus should be directly included in the valuation study. There were concerns that adults would be inconsistent in their views about a 10-year-old, partly depending on their status as a parent. CONCLUSIONS US stakeholders provided insights relevant to youth valuation in a US context and were open to continued dialogue with investigators. This study could be useful to investigators who are conducting youth valuation studies in different countries and seeking stakeholder input.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan L Nazari
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes, and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - A Simon Pickard
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes, and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ning Yan Gu
- School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kreimeier S, Mott D, Ludwig K, Greiner W. EQ-5D-Y Value Set for Germany. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:217-229. [PMID: 35604633 PMCID: PMC9124748 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01143-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Demand is increasing for youth-specific preference-based health-related quality-of-life measures for inclusion in evaluations of healthcare interventions for children and adolescents. The EQ-5D-Youth (EQ-5D-Y) has the potential to become such a preference-based measure. OBJECTIVE This study applied the recently published EQ-5D-Y valuation protocol to develop a German EQ-5D-Y value set and explored the differences between values given to youth health by parents and non-parents. METHODS To elicit EQ-5D-Y health state preferences, a representative sample of 1030 adults of the general population completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) online survey, and 215 adults participated in face-to-face interviews applying composite time trade-off (cTTO). Respondents were asked to consider a 10-year-old child living in the health states. DCE data were modelled using a mixed logit model. To derive the value set, DCE latent scale values were anchored onto adjusted mean cTTO values using a linear mapping approach. RESULTS Adult respondents considered pain/discomfort and feeling worried/sad/unhappy as the two most important dimensions in terms of youth health. Adjusted mean cTTO values ranged from - 0.350 for health state 33333 to 0.970 for health state 21111. The EQ-5D-Y value set showed a logical order for all parameter estimates, and predicted values ranged from - 0.283 to 1. Differences in preferences by parental status were mainly observed for cTTO results, where mean values were larger for parents than for non-parents. CONCLUSIONS Applying the valuation protocol, a German EQ-5D-Y value set with internally consistent coefficients was developed. This enables the instrument to be used in economic evaluations of paediatric healthcare interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Kreimeier
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
| | | | - Kristina Ludwig
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Greiner
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yang Z, Jiang J, Wang P, Jin X, Wu J, Fang Y, Feng D, Xi X, Li S, Jing M, Zheng B, Huang W, Luo N. Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for China. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:147-155. [PMID: 36396878 PMCID: PMC9758244 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01216-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The standard EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation protocol applies DCE data as the primary preference source to model the relative importance of dimensions while cTTO data served to anchor the DCE coefficients onto the QALY scale. This study aims to estimate an EQ-5D-Y-3L value set for China following this protocol, but with a larger cTTO design to better understand the role of cTTO data in estimating EQ-5D-Y-3L value sets. METHODS In total, 150 choice sets and 28 EQ-5D-Y-3L health states were valued using DCE and cTTO methods with two independent samples, respectively. General public from 14 different regions were recruited using quota sampling method to achieve representativeness. We compared two modelling strategies: (1) fit the DCE data with mixed logit model with correlated coefficients and a subsequent mapping procedure for anchoring; (2) fit the DCE and TTO data jointly in a hybrid model. Two evaluation criteria (1) coefficient significance and monotonicity; (2) prediction accuracy of the observed cTTO values were used to select the value set. RESULTS In total, 1476 individuals participated in the study, with 1058 participated the DCE interview and 418 participated the cTTO interview. The highest mean TTO value was 0.924 for state 11112 and the lowest mean TTO value was - 0.088 for state 33333. The hybrid model with an A3 term performed the best and was selected as the value set. DISCUSSION Following the international protocol and using a larger cTTO design, this study established the EQ-5D-Y-3L value set using a hybrid model for China. Future EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation study could consider using a larger cTTO design for estimating the value set.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhihao Yang
- Health Services Management Department, Guizhou Medical University, Gui'an, China.
- College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Jie Jiang
- College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei Wang
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xuejing Jin
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Wu
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yu Fang
- Department of Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, Health Science Centre, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Da Feng
- School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaoyu Xi
- The Research Centre of National Drug Policy and Ecosystem, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shunping Li
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Mingxia Jing
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
| | - Bin Zheng
- Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Weidong Huang
- School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bailey C, Howell M, Raghunandan R, Salisbury A, Chen G, Coast J, Craig JC, Devlin NJ, Huynh E, Lancsar E, Mulhern BJ, Norman R, Petrou S, Ratcliffe J, Street DJ, Howard K, Viney R. Preference Elicitation Techniques Used in Valuing Children's Health-Related Quality-of-Life: A Systematic Review. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:663-698. [PMID: 35619044 PMCID: PMC9270310 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01149-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Valuing children's health states for use in economic evaluations is globally relevant and is of particular relevance in jurisdictions where a cost-utility analysis is the preferred form of analysis for decision making. Despite this, the challenges with valuing child health mean that there are many remaining questions for debate about the approach to elicitation of values. The aim of this paper was to identify and describe the methods used to value children's health states and the specific issues that arise in the use of these methods. METHODS We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases to identify studies published in English since 1990 that used preference elicitation methods to value child and adolescent (under 18 years of age) health states. Eligibility criteria comprised valuation studies concerning both child-specific patient-reported outcome measures and child health states defined in other ways, and methodological studies of valuation approaches that may or may not have yielded a value set algorithm. RESULTS A total of 77 eligible studies were identified from which data on country setting, aims, condition (general population or clinically specific), sample size, age of respondents, the perspective that participants were asked to adopt, source of values (respondents who completed the preference elicitation tasks) and methods questions asked were extracted. Extracted data were classified and evaluated using narrative synthesis methods. The studies were classified into three groups: (1) studies comparing elicitation methods (n = 30); (2) studies comparing perspectives (n = 23); and (3) studies where no comparisons were presented (n = 26); selected studies could fall into more than one group. Overall, the studies varied considerably both in methods used and in reporting. The preference elicitation tasks included time trade-off, standard gamble, visual analogue scaling, rating/ranking, discrete choice experiments, best-worst scaling and willingness to pay elicited through a contingent valuation. Perspectives included adults' considering the health states from their own perspective, adults taking the perspective of a child (own, other, hypothetical) and a child/adolescent taking their own or the perspective of another child. There was some evidence that children gave lower values for comparable health states than did adults that adopted their own perspective or adult/parents that adopted the perspective of children. CONCLUSIONS Differences in reporting limited the conclusions that can be formed about which methods are most suitable for eliciting preferences for children's health and the influence of differing perspectives and values. Difficulties encountered in drawing conclusions from the data (such as lack of consensus and poor reporting making it difficult for users to choose and interpret available values) suggest that reporting guidelines are required to improve the consistency and quality of reporting of studies that value children's health using preference-based techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cate Bailey
- Health Economics Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Martin Howell
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rakhee Raghunandan
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Amber Salisbury
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Gang Chen
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Joanna Coast
- Health Economics Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Nancy J Devlin
- Centre for Health Policy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elisabeth Huynh
- Department of Health Services and Policy Research, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Emily Lancsar
- Department of Health Services and Policy Research, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Brendan J Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics, Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard Norman
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Deborah J Street
- Centre for Health Economics, Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten Howard
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Centre for Health Economics, Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Devlin NJ. Valuing Child Health Isn't Child's Play. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:1087-1089. [PMID: 35667949 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy J Devlin
- Centre for Health Policy, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ramos-Goñi JM, Estévez-Carrillo A, Rivero-Arias O, Rowen D, Mott D, Shah K, Oppe M. Does Changing the Age of a Child to be Considered in 3-Level Version of EQ-5D-Y Discrete Choice Experiment-Based Valuation Studies Affect Health Preferences? VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:1196-1204. [PMID: 35379562 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There has been some debate about the choice of perspective and the age of the child considered when completing preference elicitation tasks in the 3-level version of EQ-5D-Y (EQ-5D-Y-3L) valuation protocol. This study aimed to clarify the impact on latent scale EQ-5D-Y-3L values of varying the age of the child experiencing the health state considered by respondents completing the discrete choice experiment (DCE) tasks of the protocol. METHODS We conducted an online DCE with a representative sample of 1000 adults in the United Kingdom and 1000 adults in the United States. Respondents selected the health state they prefer from a series of DCE paired EQ-5D-Y-3L health state comparisons using their own perspective and that of a hypothetical child from the following age groups: "5-7 years old," "8-10 years old," "11-13 years old," and "14-15 years old." Data analysis was conducted using separate multinomial logit models for each perspective and country. We also estimated combined models including data from each possible pair of perspectives and used interactions between EQ-5D-Y-3L levels and perspective to determine whether any differences were statistically significant. RESULTS No statistically significant differences in coefficients between perspectives were found in the United States. In the United Kingdom, there were differences between the own perspective and the 5 to 7 years old perspective (looking after myself level 3) and between the 5 to 7 years old perspective and the 8 to 10 years old perspective (usual activities level 3). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that there is minimal impact on latent scale values when using different ages of the hypothetical child in the current EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Oliver Rivero-Arias
- Maths in Health, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - David Mott
- Office of Health Economics, London, England, UK
| | - Koonal Shah
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK; PHMR, London, England, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, England, UK
| | - Mark Oppe
- Maths in Health, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rowen D, Mukuria C, Powell PA, Wailoo A. Exploring the Issues of Valuing Child and Adolescent Health States Using a Mixed Sample of Adolescents and Adults. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:479-488. [PMID: 35292942 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01133-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Preferences for child and adolescent health states used to generate health state utility values can be elicited from adults, young adults, adolescents, or combinations of these. This commentary paper provides a critical overview of issues and implications arising from valuing child and adolescent health states using a novel approach of a mixed sample of adolescents and adults. The commentary is informed by critical analysis of normative, ethical, practical and theoretical arguments in the health state valuation literature. Discussion focusses upon adolescent empowerment, understanding and psychosocial maturity; ethical concerns; elicitation tasks; perspective; and selection of sample proportions across adolescents and adults. It is argued that valuation of child and adolescent health states by both adolescents and adults could involve all participants completing the same preference elicitation task using the same perspective (e.g. time trade-off imagining they are living in the health state), and all preferences being modelled to generate a combined value set that reflects both adolescent and adult preferences. It is concluded that the valuation of child and adolescent health states by a mixed adolescent and adult sample appears feasible and has the advantage that it includes some of the population who can potentially experience the health states, thus enabling adolescents to express their views around matters that may affect them, and the population that are taxpayers and voters. However, both the relative proportion of adults and adolescents to include in a valuation sample and the elicitation technique require careful consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Philip A Powell
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Allan Wailoo
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ramos-Goñi JM, Oppe M, Estévez-Carrillo A, Rivero-Arias O. Accounting for Unobservable Preference Heterogeneity and Evaluating Alternative Anchoring Approaches to Estimate Country-Specific EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: A Case Study Using Spanish Preference Data. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:835-843. [PMID: 35500952 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The EuroQol Group published the EQ-5D-Y valuation protocol that recommends 2 valuation techniques to elicit preferences: composite time trade-off (C-TTO) and discrete choice experiments (DCEs). The protocol left the decision of what modeling approach to use open for researchers. Our aims were to explore modeling strategies allowing generation of EQ-5D-Y value sets and to produce an EQ-5D-Y Spanish value set. METHODS We used EQ-5D-Y DCE and C-TTO data collected in Spain following the protocol and adopted a staged approach for our modeling exercise. First, we selected the best performing DCE latent class model and evaluated models from 2 to 10 classes. We selected the preferred model based on best goodness of fit in terms of the Bayesian information criterion. We considered 2 anchoring approaches to estimate utility values: (1) pits state anchoring and (2) hybrid models (using all available C-TTO responses). All analysis were weighted to be representative of the Spanish population. RESULTS We collected 1005 DCE and 200 C-TTO interviews. We selected a DCE model including 4 classes. Hybrid models using all available C-TTO observations produced a narrower range of values than the pits state anchoring approach. CONCLUSIONS In this article, we have presented an EQ-5D-Y value set that can be used for cost-utility analysis in Spain. The international EQ-5D-Y valuation protocol should be updated to include a different set of health states for the C-TTO experiment if researchers wish to use alternative anchoring approaches to the "pits state."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan M Ramos-Goñi
- Maths in Health, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
| | - Mark Oppe
- Maths in Health, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Oliver Rivero-Arias
- Maths in Health, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Petrou S. Methodological challenges surrounding QALY estimation for paediatric economic evaluation. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2022; 20:10. [PMID: 35241102 PMCID: PMC8896090 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-022-00345-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Cost-utility analysis remains the preferred form of economic evaluation for health technology assessment, pricing and reimbursement authorities in several countries. The results of cost-utility analyses are commonly expressed in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained where the QALY combines length of life and health-related quality of life in a single metric. This commentary provides an overview of key methodological challenges surrounding QALY estimation for paediatric economic evaluation. These challenges include issues surrounding the relevant attributes to incorporate into measurement instruments, appropriate respondents for the measurement and valuation tasks, perspectives adopted when completing valuation tasks, potential sources of bias in the description and valuation processes, and the paucity of psychometric evidence for existing measures. In addition, the commentary considers methodological challenges raised by research aimed at assessing whether a QALY gain by a child should be valued equally to a QALY gain by an adult.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Åström M, Conte H, Berg J, Burström K. 'Like holding the axe on who should live or not': adolescents' and adults' perceptions of valuing children's health states using a standardised valuation protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:2133-2142. [PMID: 35201557 PMCID: PMC9188517 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03107-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose There is an increasing interest for using qualitative methods to investigate peoples’ cognitive process when asked to value health states. A standardised valuation protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L instrument was recently developed. Little is known regarding how people think, reason, and feel when asked to value health states for children. The aim was to explore how adolescents and adults perceive the task of valuing children’s health states using the standardised valuation protocol. Methods This was a qualitative study where adults (n = 10) and adolescents (n = 10) from the general population participated in individual video-interviews. Initially, participants reported their own health with the EQ-5D-3L instrument. Then they were asked to complete several valuations tasks for a 10-year-old child according to the standardised valuation protocol, followed by a semi-structured interview with open-ended questions to further explore participants’ perceptions. A qualitative content analysis was performed. Results The two main categories that emerged from the data were ‘Thoughts and feelings when valuing children’s health states’ and ‘Strategies when valuing children’s health states’. Participants expressed feeling doubt, awfulness and being reluctant to trade-off life years, and questioned who has the right to value health states for children. Experience and point of view were strategies participants used to complete the valuation tasks. Conclusion The findings from the present study can contribute to the understanding and interpretation of quantitative results where the standardised valuation protocol has been used to derive values for the EQ-5D-Y-3L. Furthermore, results of the study support the feasibility of including adolescents in valuation studies. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-022-03107-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mimmi Åström
- Health Outcomes and Economic Evaluation Research Group, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18 A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Equity and Health Policy Research Group, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Centre for Health Economics, Informatics and Health Services Research, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Helen Conte
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Section of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jenny Berg
- Health Outcomes and Economic Evaluation Research Group, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18 A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristina Burström
- Health Outcomes and Economic Evaluation Research Group, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18 A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.,Equity and Health Policy Research Group, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Centre for Health Economics, Informatics and Health Services Research, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Do health preferences differ among Asian populations? A comparison of EQ-5D-5L discrete choice experiments data from 11 Asian studies. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:2175-2187. [PMID: 35181827 PMCID: PMC9188617 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-03075-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Many countries have established their own EQ-5D value sets proceeding on the basis that health preferences differ among countries/populations. So far, published studies focused on comparing value set using TTO data. This study aims to compare the health preferences among 11 Asian populations using the DCE data collected in their EQ-5D-5L valuation studies. Methods In the EQ-VT protocol, 196 pairs of EQ-5D-5L health states were valued by a general population sample using DCE method for all studies. DCE data were obtained from the study PI. To understand how the health preferences are different/similar with each other, the following analyses were done: (1) the statistical difference between the coefficients; (2) the relative importance of the five EQ-5D dimensions; (3) the relative importance of the response levels. Results The number of statistically differed coefficients between two studies ranged from 2 to 16 (mean: 9.3), out of 20 main effects coefficients. For the relative importance, there is not a universal preference pattern that fits all studies, but with some common characteristics, e.g. mobility is considered the most important; the relative importance of levels are approximately 20% for level 2, 30% for level 3, 70% for level 4 for all studies. Discussion Following a standardized study protocol, there are still considerable differences in the modeling and relative importance results in the EQ-5D-5L DCE data among 11 Asian studies. These findings advocate the use of local value set for calculating health state utility. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-03075-x.
Collapse
|
31
|
Lipman SA. Expect Nothing: The (Lack of) Influence of Subjective Life Expectancy on Valuation of Child Health States. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2022; 2:803109. [PMID: 36925864 PMCID: PMC10012738 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.803109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective Earlier research has shown that individuals' subjective life expectancy (SLE) affects health state valuation with time trade-off (TTO). Individuals with longer expected life durations are less willing to trade-off life duration, which yields higher utilities. In this article, the influence of SLE is explored in the valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L with a proxy perspective, i.e., adults' valuation of health states considering the life of a 10-year-old child. As SLE for children is likely higher, this might explain earlier findings suggesting that individuals are less willing to trade-off years of life for children than for adults. Methods A total of 197 respondents were recruited to take part in digital TTO interviews, facilitated by trained interviewers. TTO interviews were implemented in accordance with the recommended protocol for the valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L. Respondents valued 10 EQ-5D-Y-3L health states for a 10-year-old child, after which they were asked to report how old they themselves expected to become and also how old they expected a 10-year-old child to become. Results Generally, adult respondents reported higher SLE for children than for themselves. Neither SLE was systematically associated with the willingness to trade lifetime or the number of life years traded off in TTO tasks. This null-result was substantiated by regression analyses per health state. Conclusion The results of this study suggest that individuals' expectations about longevity are not associated with EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation. This lack of association is in contrast to earlier work and might be explained by the psychological distance introduced with proxy perspective valuation, or by the methodological differences with earlier work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan A Lipman
- Department of Health Economics, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lipman SA, Reckers-Droog VT, Karimi M, Jakubczyk M, Attema AE. Self vs. other, child vs. adult. An experimental comparison of valuation perspectives for valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L health states. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2021; 22:1507-1518. [PMID: 34611793 PMCID: PMC8492455 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01377-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES EQ-5D-Y-3L health states are valued by adults taking the perspective of a 10-year-old child. Compared to valuation of adult EQ-5D instruments, this entails two changes to the perspective: (i) child health states are valued instead of adult health states and: (ii) health states are valued for someone else instead of for oneself. Although earlier work has shown that these combined changes yield different values for child and adult health states that are otherwise equal, it currently remains unclear why. Hence, we aimed to disentangle the effects of both changes. METHODS A sample of 205 students (mean age: 19.48) was surveyed. Each respondent completed visual analogue scale (VAS) and time trade-off (TTO) tasks for five EQ-5D-Y-3L states, using four randomly ordered perspectives: (i) self-adult (themselves), (ii) other-adult (someone their age), (iii) self-child (themselves as a 10-year-old), (iv) other-child (a child of 10 years old). We compared how each perspective impacted outcomes, precision and quality of EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation. RESULTS Overall, differences between perspectives were consistent, with their direction being dependent on the health states and respondents. For VAS, the effect on outcomes of valuation depended on severity, but variance was higher in valuation with child perspectives. For TTO, we observed that EQ-5D-Y-3L states valued on behalf of others (i.e., children or adults) received higher valuations, but lower variances. CONCLUSION The use of a different perspective appears to yield systematic differences in EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation, with considerable heterogeneity between health states and respondents. This may explain mixed findings in earlier work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Lipman
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - V T Reckers-Droog
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Karimi
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Pharmerit, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Jakubczyk
- SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Decision Analysis and Support Unit, Warsaw, Poland
| | - A E Attema
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Robinson T, Hill S, Oluboyede Y. Developing a preference-based measure for weight-specific health-related quality of life in adolescence: the WAItE UK valuation study protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e054203. [PMID: 34785557 PMCID: PMC8596058 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adolescent obesity is a public health problem in the UK. The Weight-Specific Adolescent Instrument for Economic Evaluation (WAItE) has been developed as the first weight-specific health-related quality of life measure appropriate for economic evaluation, but currently cannot be used to generate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), which are the basis of cost-utility analysis. Generic measures (such as the EQ-5D-Y or CHU-9D) may be insensitive to small but important health changes in overweight or obese adolescents. This study aims to generate a preference-based scoring algorithm for the WAItE. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A discrete choice experiment (DCE) will be administered to value health states described by the WAItE classification system. These health states will be presented to members of the adult general population of the UK via an online survey. A range of regression models will be used to produce the utility algorithm for the WAItE. The DCE-visual analogue scale and time trade-off (TTO) anchoring methods will be used anchor the value set on to the 0-1 QALY scale. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Newcastle University Medical School Ethics Committee approved the study (references 4772/2020 (DCE) and 9978/2020 (TTO)). The developed algorithm can be applied to future economic evaluations of weight management interventions and treatments for adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomos Robinson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sarah Hill
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Yemi Oluboyede
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Powell PA, Rowen D, Rivero-Arias O, Tsuchiya A, Brazier JE. Valuing child and adolescent health: a qualitative study on different perspectives and priorities taken by the adult general public. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021; 19:222. [PMID: 34556133 PMCID: PMC8461831 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01858-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantitative health preference research has shown that different "perspectives", defined here as who is imagined to be experiencing particular health states, impact stated preferences. This qualitative project aimed to elucidate this phenomenon, within the context of adults' valuation of child and adolescent health states. METHODS Six focus groups with 30 members of the UK adult public were conducted between December 2019 and February 2020 and analysed using framework analysis. Each focus group had two stages. First, participants individually completed time trade-off tasks and a pairwise task (mirroring a discrete choice experiment without duration) for two EQ-5D-Y health states, assuming a series of perspectives: (a) themselves at current age; (b) another adult; (c) 10-year old child; (d) themselves as a 10-year old child. Second, a semi-structured discussion explored their responses. RESULTS Participants' views were often heterogeneous, with some common themes. Qualitatively, participants expressed a different willingness to trade-off life years for a 10-year old child versus themselves or another adult, and this differed by the health profile and child imagined. The same health states were often viewed as having a different impact on utility for a 10-year old child than adults. Imagining a 10-year old child is difficult and there is variation in who is imagined. Participants found answering based on their own-adult perspective most acceptable. There were no strong preferences for prioritising child health over working-age adults' health. CONCLUSIONS If an adult sample is used to value child- and adolescent-specific health states it is important to consider the perspective employed. Members of the adult public provide different responses when different perspectives are used due to differences in the perceived impact of the same health states. If adults are asked to imagine a child, we recommend that sampling is representative for parental status, since this can affect preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip A Powell
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Oliver Rivero-Arias
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Aki Tsuchiya
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
- Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John E Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lipman SA, Reckers-Droog VT, Kreimeier S. Think of the Children: A Discussion of the Rationale for and Implications of the Perspective Used for EQ-5D-Y Health State Valuation. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:976-982. [PMID: 34243841 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The recently published EQ-5D-Y valuation protocol prescribes the general public values EQ-5D-Y health states for a 10-year-old child. This child perspective differs from the individual perspective applied for valuation of adult EQ-5D instruments. This article discusses the rationale for and implications of applying a child perspective for EQ-5D-Y health state valuation. METHODS This article was informed by an exploration of the normative and empirical literature on health state valuation. We identified and summarized key discussion points in a narrative review. RESULTS Although valuing EQ-5D-Y health states from an individual perspective is feasible, it may be problematic for several reasons. The use of a child perspective implies that-rather than valuing one's own health-someone else's health is valued. This may require the projection of one's own beliefs, expectations, and preferences on others, which could change the decision processes underlying the elicited preferences. Furthermore, because preferences are obtained for a 10-year-old child, it is unclear if this given age as well as other (missing) information on the described child beneficiary (should) affect valuation of EQ-5D-Y health states. CONCLUSIONS The change from an individual to a child perspective in the valuation of EQ-5D-Y will likely lead to differences in utilities. This has implications for the estimation of incremental health-related quality-of-life gains in economic evaluations of health technologies for children and adolescents and therefore might affect reimbursement decisions. Further research is necessary for gaining insight into the extent to which this impact is normatively and empirically justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan A Lipman
- Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Vivian T Reckers-Droog
- Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone Kreimeier
- Bielefeld University, School of Public Health, Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|