2. Cervical radicular pain

INTRODUCTION

Cervical radicular pain is pain perceived in the upper limb, caused by irritation or compression of a cervical spine nerve, the roots of the nerve, or both.

METHODS

The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radicular pain was retrieved and summarized.

RESULTS

The diagnosis is made by combining elements from the patient's history, physical examination, and supplementary tests. The Spurling and shoulder abduction tests are the two most common examinations used to identify cervical radicular pain. MRI without contrast, CT scanning, and in some cases plain radiography can all be appropriate imaging techniques for nontraumatic cervical radiculopathy. MRI is recommended prior to interventional treatments. Exercise with or without other treatments can be beneficial. There is scant evidence for the use of paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and neuropathic pain medications such as gabapentin, pregabalin, tricyclic antidepressants, and anticonvulsants for the treatment of radicular pain. Acute and subacute cervical radicular pain may respond well to epidural corticosteroid administration, preferentially using an interlaminar approach. By contrast, for chronic cervical radicular pain, the efficacy of epidural corticosteroid administration is limited. In these patients, pulsed radiofrequency treatment adjacent to the dorsal root ganglion may be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

There is currently no gold standard for the diagnosis of cervical radicular pain. There is scant evidence for the use of medication. Epidural corticosteroid injection and pulsed radiofrequency adjacent to the dorsal root ganglion may be considered. [Correction added on 12 June 2023, after first online publication: The preceding sentence was corrected.].

ED MRI: Safety, Consent, and Regulatory Considerations

MRI is a vital examination in the emergency department, especially in patients with stroke, spinal cord compression, cardiovascular emergencies, appendicitis, and trauma. It is important to consider its underlying safety hazards because of its strong magnetic and radio frequency fields. Multiple resources are available to guide radiology departments on the safe functioning of an MRI site. Four-zone site layout, MR compatibility labeling, MR personnel training, detailed screening process, access control, and appropriate implementation of safety policies and procedures are all necessary to maintain a safe and hazard-free MR environment.

Cervical Radiculopathy Focus on Characteristics and Differential Diagnosis

Cervical radiculopathy is characterized by neurological dysfunction caused by compression and inflammation of the spinal nerves or nerve roots of the cervical spine. It mainly presents with neck and arm pain, sensory loss, motor dysfunction, and reflex changes according to the dermatomal distribution. The most common causes of cervical radiculopathy are cervical disc herniation and cervical spondylosis. It is important to find the exact symptomatic segment and distinguish between conditions that may mimic certain cervical radicular compression syndromes through meticulous physical examinations and precise reading of radiographs. Non-surgical treatments are recommended as an initial management. Surgery is applicable to patients with intractable or persistent pain despite sufficient conservative management or with severe or progressive neurological deficits. Cervical radiculopathy is treated surgically by anterior and/or posterior approaches. The appropriate choice of surgical treatment should be individualized, considering the patient’s main pathophysiology, specific clinical symptoms and radiographic findings thoroughly.

Inter-observer reliability and clinical validity of the MRI grading system for cervical central stenosis based on sagittal T2-weighted image

PURPOSE

The aim was to evaluate the inter-observer reliability of the Kang system among radiologists, residents, and clinicians and examine the correlation between radiologic and clinical findings.

METHODS

A total of 133 patients (M:F = 44:89, mean age 56 years) who underwent MRI of the cervical spine at our hospital were included. Two radiologists, two trainees, and two clinicians measured Central cervical spinal stenosis (CCSS) grade at the narrowest point according to the grading system suggested by Kang et al. A different clinician (a neurosurgeon) assessed the associated neurologic manifestations. Kappa statistics were used to analyze the inter-reader agreement among the radiologists, trainees, and clinicians. The clinical correlation (R) between grade and positive clinical manifestations (PCMs) was assessed using nonparametric correlation analysis (Spearman's correlation).

RESULTS

We found almost perfect agreement between trainees (k value = 0.890) and between radiologists (k value = 0.912) and substantial agreement between clinicians (k value = 0.691). Clinical correlations for all six readers suggested moderate correlation with R values ranging from 0.380 to 0.566. There was moderate correlation between grade and clinical manifestation within each group (R = 0.562-0.669).

CONCLUSION

The Kang MRI grading system of CCSS based on mid-sagittal MRI provides objective, reliable, and reproducible assessment regardless of field proficiency of the reader although the reproducibility of the clinician is slightly lower than radiologist and trainee of the radiology department. There was moderate correlation between image interpretation and clinical findings irrespective of the reader's main field of research.

Is there a difference in the grade of degeneration at the cervical spine following anterior cervical fusion with respect to clinical outcome, diagnosis, and repeat procedure? An MRI study of 102 patients with a mean follow-up of 25 years

OBJECTIVE

There is currently no consensus on whether adjacent-segment degeneration (ASD), loss of disc height (DH), and loss of sagittal segmental angle (SSA) are due to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The purpose of the present study was to assess the grade of segmental degeneration after ACDF and to analyze if there is a difference with respect to clinical outcome, diagnosis, and number of operated levels.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients who underwent ACDF with a minimum follow-up of 18 years were retrospectively identified. At final follow-up, the clinical outcome according to Odom's criteria, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and reoperation for symptomatic ASD (sASD) was assessed. MRI was performed, and DH, SSA, and the segmental degeneration index (SDI, a 5-step grading system that includes disc signal intensity, anterior and posterior disc protrusion, narrowing of the disc space, and foraminal stenosis) were assessed for evaluation of the 2 adjacent and 4 adjoining segments to the ACDF. MRI findings were compared with respect to clinical outcome (NDI: 0%-20% vs > 20%; Odom's criteria: success vs no success), reoperation for sASD, initial diagnosis (cervical disc herniation [CDH] vs cervical spondylotic myelopathy [CSM] and spondylosis), and the number of operated levels (1 vs 2-4 levels).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 25 years (range 18-45 years), and the diagnosis was CDH in 74.5% of patients and CSM/spondylosis in 25.5%. At follow-up, the mean NDI was 12.4% (range 0%-36%), the clinical success rate was 87.3%, and the reoperation rate for sASD was 15.7%. For SDI, no significant differences were seen with respect to NDI, Odom's criteria, and sASD. Patients diagnosed with CDH had significantly more degeneration at the adjacent segments (cranial, p = 0.015; caudal, p = 0.017). Patients with a 2- to 4-level procedure had less degeneration at the caudal adjacent (p = 0.011) and proximal adjoining (p = 0.019) segments. Aside from a significantly lower DH at the proximal cranial adjoining segment in cases of CSM/spondylosis and without clinical success, no further differences were noted. The degree of SSA was not significantly different with respect to clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were seen in the SDI grade and SSA with respect to clinical outcome. The SDI is higher after single-level ACDF and with the diagnosis of CDH. The DH was negligibly different with respect to clinical outcome, diagnosis, and number of operated levels.

Is there an impact of cervical plating on the development of adjacent segment degeneration following Smith-Robinson procedure? A magnetic resonance imaging study of 84 patients with a 24-year follow-up

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) without and with cervical plating (ACDF+CP) are accepted surgical techniques for the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disorders. The effect of CP on the development of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) remains unclear.

PURPOSE

To assess whether CP accelerates the degeneration of the adjacent and adjoining segments.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is an imaging cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Retrospectively, a total of 84 patients who underwent ACDF or ACDF+CP were identified. At final follow-up, an MRI was performed and evaluated in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An MRI of 84 patients who underwent ACDF (46 patients) and ACDF+PS (38 patients) was performed. The mean follow-up was 24 years (17-45 years). None of the patients had a repeat procedure in the cervical spine. The grade of degeneration of the segments adjacent and adjoining to the fusion was assessed via a five-step grading system (segmental degeneration index, or SDI) that includes disc signal intensity, anterior and posterior disc protrusion, narrowing of the disc space, and foraminal stenosis. Furthermore, the disc height (DH) and sagittal segmental angle (SSA) of fused segments were measured.

RESULTS

A significantly (p<.001) greater SDI was identified at the caudal adjacent segment following ACDF compared to ACDF+CP. No other significant differences were identified in patients following ACDF and ACDF+CP. Between 50% and 96% of all segments showed severe degenerative changes according to SDI. There was no significant difference in DH between the patients following ACDF and ACDF+CP. The SSA in patients who underwent ACDF+CP was significantly greater than in the ACDF patients (p=.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients, cervical plating had no significant impact on segmental degeneration and decrease of DH in the adjacent and adjoining segments. ACDF+CP seem to preserve the lordotic alignment more with respect to the SSA than ACDF.

Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With an Autologous Iliac Crest Graft: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of 59 Patients With a Mean Follow-up of 27 Years

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) is a widely accepted surgical technique for the treatment of degenerative disc disease. ACDF is associated with adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether physiological aging of the spine would overcome ASD by comparing adjacent to adjoining segments more than 18 yr after ACDF.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance imaging of 59 (36 male, 23 female) patients who underwent ACDF was performed to assess degeneration. The mean follow-up was 27 yr (18-45 yr). Besides measuring the disc height, a 5-step grading system (segmental degeneration index [SDI]) including disc signal intensity, anterior and posterior disc protrusion, narrowing of the disc space, and foraminal stenosis was used to assess the grade of adjacent and adjoining segments.

RESULTS

The SDI of cranial and caudal adjacent segments was significantly higher compared to adjoining segments (P &lt; .001). The disc height of cranial and caudal adjacent segments was significantly lower compared to adjoining segments (P &lt; .001, P &lt; .01). The SDI of adjacent segments in patients with repeat cervical procedure was significantly higher than in patients without repeat procedure (P = .02, P = .01). The disc height of the cranial adjacent segments in patients with repeat procedure was significantly lower than in patients without repeat procedure (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

The physiological aging of the cervical spine does not overcome ASD. The disc height and the SDI in adjacent segment are significantly worse compared to adjoining segments. Patients who underwent repeat procedure had even worse findings of disc height and SDI.

Cervical radiculopathy: epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Cervical radiculopathy is a relatively common neurological disorder resulting from nerve root dysfunction, which is often due to mechanical compression; however, inflammatory cytokines released from damaged intervertebral disks can also result in symptoms. Cervical radiculopathy can often be diagnosed with a thorough history and physical examination, but an magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomographic myelogram should be used to confirm the diagnosis. Because of the ubiquity of degenerative changes found on these imaging modalities, the patient's symptoms must correlate with pathology for a successful diagnosis. In the absence of myelopathy or significant muscle weakness all patients should be treated conservatively for at least 6 weeks. Conservative treatments consist of immobilization, anti-inflammatory medications, physical therapy, cervical traction, and epidural steroid injections. Cervical radiculopathy typically is self-limiting with 75%-90% of patients achieving symptomatic improvement with nonoperative care. For patients who are persistently symptomatic despite conservative treatment, or those who have a significant functional deficit surgical treatment is appropriate. Surgical options include anterior cervical decompression and fusion, cervical disk arthroplasty, and posterior foraminotomy. Patient selection is critical to optimize outcome.

Does choice of imaging modality affect outcome in dogs with thoracolumbar spinal conditions?

OBJECTIVES

A retrospective cross-sectional study was done to look for differences in outcome in canine spinal patients that had myelography compared to those that had magnetic resonance imaging.

METHODS

Medical records of dogs with spinal conditions in the period January 2004 to December 2007 were reviewed. Data on patient age, gender, breed, size, neurolocalisation, rate of onset, imaging modality, time taken to image, type of treatment, neurological grade at admission and discharge, length and cost of hospitalisation and status at discharge were collected. Only dogs with neurological grade 3 to 6 with signs referable to the thoracolumbar spine were included.

RESULTS

Of 107 dogs that met the inclusion criteria, 66 (62%) had myelography and 41 (38%) had magnetic resonance imaging. Using multivariable analyses, non-chondrodystrophoid breed, increasing age and higher neurological grade at admission were found to be associated negatively with survival. Neurological grade 5 at admission was found to be associated positively with likelihood of neurological improvement. Male gender, higher neurological grade at admission and medical treatment were associated negatively with length of hospitalisation. magnetic resonance imaging, surgical treatment and period of hospitalisation were associated positively with total cost of hospitalisation.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

No significant association was found between type of imaging and any patient outcome variables except cost of hospitalisation, which was higher for dogs having magnetic resonance imaging. Although magnetic resonance imaging may be considered advantageous compared to myelography because it is non-invasive and provides superior anatomical detail for surgical guidance, no beneficial effect on outcome of dogs with non-ambulatory thoracolumbar spinal disease was found.

Clinical usefulness of CT-myelogram comparing with the MRI in degenerative cervical spinal disorders: is CTM still useful for primary diagnostic tool?

STUDY DESIGN

A radiographic review of 50 patients (29 radiculopathy and 21 myelopathy) who had undergone the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion was performed by 3 observers retrospectively.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and postmyelographic computed tomography (CTM) in degenerative cervical spine disease by assessing the degree of interobserver and intraobserver agreement.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The assessment of degenerative cervical spinal disease is still demanding. Now MRI is accepted as a primary diagnostic tool for degenerative cervical spine disease. Compared with MRI, usage of CTM has diminished, but it is usually reserved for the patients for whom MRI results were ambiguous or technically suboptimal.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed MRIs and CTMs of 50 patients (29 radiculopathy and 21 myelopathy) who had undergone the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedure. Using an assessment scale, 3 observers examined 5 parameters: spinal canal narrowing, foraminal stenosis, bony abnormality, intervertebral disk herniation, and nerve root compression. The degree of severity was graded using a 4-point scale for each item. Intraobserver, interobserver agreement, and the accentuation of each image were analyzed.

RESULTS

Intraclass correlation coefficiency statistical analysis showed moderate intraobserver agreement (Cronbach's alpha=0.63) and interobserver agreement (0.52). There was no significant difference in intraobserver, interobserver agreement between MRI (0.58) and CTM (0.57). Compared between MRI and CTM, disc abnormality and nerve root compression on MRI and foraminal stenosis and bony lesion on CTM showed better agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

CTM was still useful in diagnosis of the foraminal stenosis and bony lesion comparing with MRI but showed limitation in disc abnormality and nerve root compression. So even though CTM may provide valuable additional information in difficult or ambiguous cases, it also requires universal standards and sound experience for constant and objective information.

Manual therapy, exercise, and traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

To date, optimal strategies for the management of patients with cervical radiculopathy remain elusive. Preliminary evidence suggests that a multimodal treatment program consisting of manual therapy, exercise, and cervical traction may result in positive outcomes for patients with cervical radiculopathy. However, limited evidence exists to support the use of mechanical cervical traction in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of manual therapy and exercise, with or without the addition of cervical traction, on pain, function, and disability in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

DESIGN

This study was a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

The study was conducted in orthopedic physical therapy clinics.

PATIENTS

Patients diagnosed with cervical radiculopathy (N=81) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: a group that received manual therapy, exercise, and intermittent cervical traction (MTEXTraction group) and a group that received manual therapy, exercise, and sham intermittent cervical traction (MTEX group).

INTERVENTION

Patients were treated, on average, 2 times per week for an average of 4.2 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS

Outcome measurements were collected at baseline and at 2 weeks and 4 weeks using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), and the Neck Disability Index (NDI).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups for any of the primary or secondary outcome measures at 2 weeks or 4 weeks. The effect size between groups for each of the primary outcomes was small (NDI=1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]=-6.8 to 3.8; PSFS=0.29, 95% CI=-1.8 to 1.2; and NPRS=0.52, 95% CI=-1.8 to 1.2).

LIMITATIONS

The use of a nonvalidated clinical prediction rule to diagnose cervical radiculopathy and the lack of a control group without treatment were limitations of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the addition of mechanical cervical traction to a multimodal treatment program of manual therapy and exercise yields no significant additional benefit to pain, function, or disability in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in predicting facet arthrosis in the cervical spine

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) to predict the presence of cervical facet arthrosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In the Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trials of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), the presence of facet arthrosis on CT was a contraindication to the insertion of a CDA. Most surgeons routinely obtain an MRI, but not necessarily a CT before performing surgery in the cervical spine. We sought to determine if the MRI alone is adequate to assess for the presence of facet arthrosis.

METHODS

Three experienced spine surgeons retrospectively evaluated CT scans and MRIs of the same patients, obtained within 30 days of each other in a blinded, random fashion. Reviewers graded each of the MRI and CT scan as normal or abnormal on 3 separate occasions and if the facet was abnormal, each reviewer graded the degree of arthrosis. The radiologist's evaluation for each study was compared with our results.

RESULTS

Of 594 facets analyzed, 43.1% were categorized as normal on CT, and of those, MRI concordance was only 63.7% with moderate/substantial intermethod agreement. Furthermore, MRI was concordant only 15.9% of the time in patients with ankylosed facet joints on CT. CT inter-rater reliability showed substantial agreement for diagnoses of both normal and ankylosis and fair agreement for lesser degrees of facet arthrosis. MRI inter-rater reliability showed fair/moderate agreement in normal and ankylosed segments and only slight agreement with lesser degrees of facet arthrosis. CT intrarater reliability showed substantial agreement in normal or ankylosed joints, but only fair agreement for all other categories; MRI showed only fair agreement.

CONCLUSION

The ability of MRI to adequately determine the presence or amount of facet arthrosis is not reliable. Additionally, for abnormal facets, MRI was not reliable in adequately determining the degree of arthrosis. Our data suggest that computed tomography remains necessary in diagnosing facet arthrosis before CDA.

COMPARISON OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND MYELOGRAPHY IN 18 DOBERMAN PINSCHER DOGS WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOMYELOPATHY

Eighteen Doberman pinscher dogs with clinical signs of cervical spondylomyelopathy (wobbler syndrome) underwent cervical myelography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Cervical myelography was performed using iohexol, followed by lateral and ventrodorsal radiographs. Traction myelography was performed using a cervical harness exerting 9 kg of linear traction. MR imaging was performed in sagittal, transverse, and dorsal planes using a 1.5 T magnet with the spine in neutral and traction positions. Three reviewers independently evaluated the myelographic and MR images to determine the most extensive lesion and whether the lesion was static or dynamic. All reviewers agreed with the location of the most extensive lesion on MR images (100%), while the agreement using myelography was 83%. The myelogram and MR imaging findings agreed in the identification of the affected site in 13-16 dogs depending on the reviewer. MR imaging provided additional information on lesion location because it allowed direct examination of the spinal cord diameter and parenchyma. Spinal cord signal changes were seen in 10 dogs. Depending on the reviewer, two to four dogs had their lesions classified as dynamic on myelography but static on MR images. Myelography markedly underscored the severity of the spinal cord compression in two dogs, and failed to identify the cause of the signs in another. The results of this study indicated that, although myelography can identify the location of the lesion in most patients, MR imaging appears to be more accurate in predicting the site, severity, and nature of the spinal cord compression.

A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy

Clinical provocative tests of the neck, which position the neck and arm inorder to aggravate or relieve arm symptoms, are commonly used in clinical practice in patients with a suspected cervical radiculopathy. Their diagnostic accuracy, however, has never been examined in a systematic review. A comprehensive search was conducted in order to identify all possible studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria. A study was included if: (1) any provocative test of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy was identified; (2) any reference standard was used; (3) sensitivity and specificity were reported or could be (re-)calculated; and, (4) the publication was a full report. Two reviewers independently selected studies, and assessed methodological quality. Only six studies met the inclusion criteria, which evaluated five provocative tests. In general, Spurling's test demonstrated low to moderate sensitivity and high specificity, as did traction/neck distraction, and Valsalva's maneuver. The upper limb tension test (ULTT) demonstrated high sensitivity and low specificity, while the shoulder abduction test demonstrated low to moderate sensitivity and moderate to high specificity. Common methodological flaws included lack of an optimal reference standard, disease progression bias, spectrum bias, and review bias. Limitations include few primary studies, substantial heterogeneity, and numerous methodological flaws among the studies; therefore, a meta-analysis was not conducted. This review suggests that, when consistent with the history and other physical findings, a positive Spurling's, traction/neck distraction, and Valsalva's might be indicative of a cervical radiculopathy, while a negative ULTT might be used to rule it out. However, the lack of evidence precludes any firm conclusions regarding their diagnostic value, especially when used in primary care. More high quality studies are necessary in order to resolve this issue.

Value of magnetic resonance myelography in the diagnosis of disc herniation and spinal stenosis

Magnetic resonance imaging provides a good-quality image over the entire length of the spine and can assess the morphology of the discs and cord. It is the imaging modality of choice in the investigation of spinal diseases. Magnetic resonance myelography (MRM) is non-invasive, has comparable sensitivity to conventional myelography in visualizing lumbar nerve roots and allows overall assessment of the spinal canal even in the presence of cerebrospinal fluid block. Seventy-two patients with pre-surgical diagnosis of disc herniation were prospectively investigated prior to surgery to determine the value of MRM in the diagnosis of disc herniation and spinal stenosis. The difference between the sensitivity and accuracy of MRI (89.0-95.6%, 89.1-95.7%) and MRM (82.4-89.0%, 82.6-89.1%) was not significant for both observers. There was no significant improvement with the addition of MRM to MRI (91.2-97.8%, 91.3-97.8%). Although MRM did not significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy of MRI, it allowed a better overall view of the dural sac and root sleeves, therefore making it easier to diagnose spinal stenosis and disc herniation in a minority of cases.

Artificial lamina-assisted laminoplasty performed in seven cases

OBJECT

The authors attempted to simplify the operative approach to severe multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Seven patients with progressive and severe myelopathy underwent modified double-door laminoplasty during a 5-month period.

METHODS

The double-door laminoplasty procedure was modified by using two artificial titanium laminae obtained by simple surgical 0.5-mm Ti-mesh (rather than by bone graft or ceramic spacers). Preoperatively, gait disturbance was present in all patients with long-tract signs on neurological examination. In all cases the sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal was somewhat reduced (< 10 mm) by congenital stenosis, and further severe compression of the spinal cord resulted from osteophytic bars and calcified ligamenta flava at different levels. No abnormal alignment, pathological movements, or instability was present. Computerized tomography (CT) studies demonstrated severe multilevel cervical compression, and T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging demonstrated pathological areas of hyperintensity within the spinal cord in all cases. In the initial follow-up study (range 8-12 months), the patients who underwent this procedure experienced marked improvement of gait disturbance without any significant incidence of morbidity or complications. Postoperative CT and MR imaging studies demonstrated complete spinal cord decompression and restoration of the patency of the subarachnoid spaces.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed procedure has the advantage of achieving both an immediate stabilization of the open laminae by means of a bridgelike mechanism and protection from the possible compression of the dural sac by paravertebral muscles.

Thin-section CT in the examination of cervical disc herniation. A prospective study with 1-mm axial and helical images

PURPOSE

The aim of the investigation was to determine whether thin-section high-resolution CT imaging could replace MR imaging and/or myelography in preoperative evaluation of radiculopathy and/or myelopathy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 120 patients, referred for cervical myelography (n=107) or MR imaging (n=13), were further examined with 1-mm non-contrast CT of the suspected disc space, including at least the next cephalic and caudal interspaces. Thirty-seven patients underwent Cloward's operation, at which 32 were found to have disc herniation.

RESULTS

The sensitivities of CT (n=37), myelography (n=29) and MR imaging (n=8) were 66%, 84%, and 86%, respectively. The corresponding figures for false-positives were 8%, 10%, and 13%. Artefacts caused by wide shoulders in the 1-mm CT images were estimated to have contributed to a false-negative finding in 8 cases. The remaining 3 false-negatives were retrospectively considered evaluation errors. The true-positive CT findings usually presented with a local disc bulge measuring over 80 HU in density. Local ligamentous hypertrophy presented an indistinguishable finding in 3 cases, yielding false-positive CT findings.

CONCLUSION

Conventional thin-section CT is considered a usable alternative for the evaluation of suspected cervical disc herniations in selected patients. Stocky patients with wide shoulders and a short neck are not suitable candidates, even when new generation equipment is available.

Fast spin-echo MR assessment of patients with poor outcome following spinal cervical surgery

PURPOSE

The aim of the investigation was to evaluate poor outcome following spinal and cervical surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 146 consecutive patients operated with anterior discectomy and fusion (ADF) with the Cloward technique were investigated. Clinical notes, plain radiography, CT, and fast spin-echo (FSE) images were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Some 30% of the patients had unsatisfactory clinical results within 12 months after surgery; 13% had initial improvement followed by deterioration of the preoperative symptoms, while 14.4% were not improved or worsened. Disc herniation and bony stenosis above, below, or at the fused level were the most common findings. In 45% of patients, surgery failed to decompress the spinal canal. In only 4 patients was no cause of remaining myelopathy and/or radiculopathy found. FSE demonstrated a large variety of pathological findings in the patients with poor clinical outcome after ADF. Postoperatively, patients with good clinical outcome had a lower incidence of pathological changes.

CONCLUSION

FSE is considered the primary imaging modality for the cervical spine. However, CT is a useful complement in the axial projection to visualize bone changes.

Two-dimensional MRI at 1.5 and 0.5 T versus CT myelography in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy

A prospective comparison was made of standard two-dimensional MRI sequences, at both high and midfield strength, with CT myelography in 23 patients with cervical spondylosis. MRI is adequate for assessment of cord compression, where high field strength is superior to midfield strength. MRI using 4-mm sections is inadequate for presurgical assessment of root compression. It remains to be proven whether thin-section white-CSF volume sequences or gadolinium-enhanced volume studies can replace CT myelography.

Assessment of the narrow cervical spinal canal: a prospective comparison of MRI, myelography and CT-myelography

This study was designed to compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), myelography and computed tomography in the assessment of degenerative cervical spinal stenosis. We prospectively examined a total of 75 spinal segments in 18 patients with suspected cervical spinal canal stenosis, using sagittal spin-echo and axial gradient-echo sequences generated by a 1.5 Tesla imager, conventional myelography, and computed tomography with intrathecal contrast medium (CT-myelography). The degree of stenosis was often overestimated using MRI. This error was most prominent in cases of severe stenosis but was significant with minor to moderate stenosis. In these cases, the clinical consequences of such an overestimation can be serious, because treatment is misdirected. The error is probably caused by pulsation of the cerebrospinal fluid and truncation artefact (Gibbs phenomenon). MRI at 1.5 Tesla is thus frequently inadequate for diagnostic assessment of degenerative cervical spinal stenosis. Myelography and myelographic CT are still useful for decisions on operative treatment, especially in cases of moderate stenosis. This may, however, not apply to imagers operating at 0.5 Tesla as below.

Diagnostic imaging algorithm for cervical soft disc herniation

MRI with surface coils is currently the preferred method for evaluating degenerative cervical spine disease. The differentiation between soft disc herniation and osteophytic spurs is not always obvious, however, on a 0.5 Tesla unit. The procedure of choice for soft disc herniation, MRI on a 0.5 T superconducting system associated with plain radiography of the cervical spine, in selecting patients for anterior cervical discectomy without interbody fusion (ACD), was evaluated. This prospective study comprised 100 patients with cervical radicular symptoms, not subsiding after conservative treatment. Plain radiographs were obtained for all patients. Patients without spinal instability, spondylosis, or major osteophytes on plain radiographs and without clinical findings of myelopathy underwent MRI (n = 59) on a 0.5 Tesla superconducting system. The other 41 patients underwent CT myelography. On MRI, herniation of a cervical soft disc was seen in 55 patients and the localisation corresponded well with the clinical symptoms. CT myelography showed a foraminal herniation in one of four selected patients with negative MRI. Fifty of 55 patients underwent ACD. All herniations were confirmed at operation, but in two patients there were important foraminal spurs not seen on MRI. It is concluded that 0.5 T MRI combined with plain radiographs offers an accurate, non-invasive test in the assessment of selected patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Cervical radiculopathy

The history, pathoanatomy and pathophysiology, clinical picture, differential diagnosis, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of cervical radiculopathy are reviewed. The review is based on a 10-year Medline literature search, review of bibliographies in textbooks, and bibliographies in articles obtained through the search. Cervical radiculopathy, although recognized early in the 20th century, was first associated with disc pathology in the mid-1930s. It is most commonly caused by disc herniation or cervical spondylosis. History and physical examination using pain location, manual muscle testing, and specialized testing (Spurling's maneuver) will usually suffice to diagnose the radiculopathy and determine the root level involved. Diagnostic imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or myelography should be used as presurgical evaluative tools or when tumor or other etiology besides disc herniation or spondylosis is suspected. Electromyography is of benefit in distinguishing various entities that clinically present similar to cervical radiculopathy and can also help to "date" the lesion. Treatment of this disorder has not been systematically studied in a controlled fashion. However, using a variety of different treatments, the radiculopathy usually improves without the need for surgery. Indications for surgery are unremitting pain despite a full trial of non-surgical management, progressive weakness, or new or progressive cervical myelopathy. Prospective studies evaluating the various treatment options would be of great benefit in guiding practitioners toward optimum cost-effective evaluation and care of the patient with cervical radiculopathy.

Management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy

Images

Usefulness of MRI in the preoperative diagnosis of cervical disk herniation

We investigated the preoperative diagnostic value of MRI, myelography, and CT myelography (CTM) in a retrospective analysis of 17 patients (15 men and two women) who were surgically treated for cervical disk herniation. Their ages ranged from 29 to 63 years, with a mean of 49 years. Anterior interbody fusion using iliac bone grafts was performed following microscopic diskectomy in all patients. MRI, myelography, and CTM were performed in 13 patients, while four patients were operated on after MRI alone. Neurological improvement was observed in all 17 patients after the surgery. MRI proved useful for determining the level of symptomatic cervical disk herniation. Surgery can be carried out on the basis of MRI findings alone when there is disk herniation at a single level which corresponds with the patient's symptoms and signs.

Magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatology

Images

MRI in the management of suspected cervical spondylotic myelopathy

One hundred and two patients with suspected cervical spondylotic myelopathy were prospectively investigated using MRI as the initial imaging technique. The aim was to discover if clinicians could manage patients with MRI alone, or if they would find a second investigation necessary. Eighty two patients were managed using MRI alone, 34 of whom were treated surgically. Twenty patients had a second investigation: a myelogram in 18 and a CT myelogram in two. This was performed in nine patients to exclude structural pathology in the thoracic or lumbar region (which was not examined with MRI), and in 11 to obtain more specific information about the cervical region. Only five of these 20 patients had surgical treatment. The diagnosis changed after the second investigation in four patients, but management was not influenced in any of these. MRI is a satisfactory alternative to myelography for most patients with suspected cervical spondylotic myelopathy.