Fatal serotonin syndrome following a combined overdose of moclobemide, clomipramine and fluoxetine

Management of serotonin syndrome (toxicity)

Serotonin syndrome (toxicity), resulting from an excessive accumulation of serotonin in the central nervous system, it can occur due to various factors such as the initiation of medication, overdose or drug interactions. Diagnosing serotonin toxicity presents challenges as there are no definitive criteria. This review delves into the pathophysiology, incidence, clinical assessment and management of serotonin toxicity, stressing the significance of promptly recognizing and managing severe cases. Diagnosis relies primarily relies on clinical assessment due to the absence of specific laboratory tests. The Hunter Serotonin Toxicity criteria are commonly utilized but have only been validated in the overdose setting. Assessing the severity of toxicity is crucial for guiding management decisions. Supportive care, discontinuation of causative agents and symptomatic treatment are prioritized in management. Mild toxicity often requires withdrawal or reduction of the serotonergic agent, while more severe toxicity requires more aggressive resuscitative and supportive care. Severe serotonin toxicity characterized by hyperthermia and rigidity requires aggressive supportive measures, including benzodiazepines, intubation, paralysis and active cooling. Animal studies suggest potential benefits of 5-HT2A receptor antagonists in preventing hyperthermia and fatalities, but only at high doses. Their clinical effectiveness remains uncertain, and evidence is predominately from case series and case reports. Although commonly used, serotonin antagonists like cyproheptadine lack conclusive evidence of efficacy. Other serotonin antagonists such as chlorpromazine and olanzapine have been explored but evidence is limited to case reports. Hence, the cornerstone of treating severe cases does not lie in 'antidote' administration or even diagnosis but in effective early resuscitative and supportive care.

Clinically Relevant Drug Interactions with Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) are a class of drugs that were originally developed for the treatment of depression but have since been expanded to be used in management of affective and neurological disorders, as well as stroke and aging-related neurocognitive changes. Ranging from irreversible to reversible and selective to non-selective, these drugs target the monoamine oxidase (MAO) enzyme and prevent the oxidative deamination of various monoamines and catecholamines such as serotonin and dopamine, respectively. Tyramine is a potent releaser of norepinephrine (NE) and is found in high concentrations in foods such as aged cheeses and meats. Under normal conditions, NE is unable to accumulate to toxic levels due to the presence of MAO-A, an enzyme that degrades neurotransmitters, including NE. When MAO-A is inhibited, the capacity to handle tyramine intake from the diet is significantly reduced causing the brain to be vulnerable to overstimulation of postsynaptic adrenergic receptors with as little as 8-10 mg of tyramine ingested and can result in life-threatening blood pressure elevations. In addition to adverse reactions with certain foods, both older and newer MAOIs can negatively interact with both sympathomimetic and serotonergic drugs. In general, patients on a MAOI want to avoid two types of medications: those that can elevate blood pressure via sympathomimetic actions (e.g., phenylephrine and oxymetazoline) and those that can increase serotonin levels via 5-HT reuptake inhibition (e.g., dextromethorphan, chlorpheniramine, and brompheniramine). Illicit drugs that stimulate the central nervous system such as ecstasy (MDMA, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) act as serotonin releasers. Patient involvement is also crucial to ensure any interaction within the healthcare setting includes making other providers aware of a MAOI prescription as well as avoiding certain OTC medications that can interact adversely with MAOIs.

The serotonin toxidrome: shortfalls of current diagnostic criteria for related syndromes

INTRODUCTION

Serotonin syndrome (toxicity) describes adverse drug effects from toxic amounts of intra-synaptic central nervous system serotonin. A wide range of drugs have been implicated to cause serotonin toxicity, not all justifiably. The plausible agents all have a final common pathway resulting in a substantial increase in central nervous system serotonergic neurotransmission. Serotonin toxicity is characterized by neuromuscular excitation, mental status changes, and autonomic dysregulation. Signs and symptoms represent a spectrum of toxicity (mild to life-threatening) related to increasing serotonin concentrations. As there is no consensus on the threshold for "toxicity" or diagnostic criteria, the true incidence of serotonin toxicity is unknown. The incidence in overdose is easier to quantify and is reasonably common in serotonergic antidepressant overdoses. In a large case series of overdoses, moderate serotonin toxicity occurred in 14% of poisonings with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. While half those ingesting a monoamine oxidase inhibitor in combination with a serotonergic agent in overdose exhibit at least moderately severe serotonin toxicity. In contrast, the incidence of serotonin toxicity in those on therapeutic serotonergic agents appears to be very low.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a narrative review of the current diagnostic criteria, utilizing case reports of fatalities to evaluate how many meet the various diagnostic criteria and propose practical solutions to resolve controversies in diagnosis.

METHODS

A review of serotonin toxicity diagnostic criteria in the English literature was completed by searching Embase and PubMed from January 1990 to July 2021 for the keywords "serotonin syndrome/toxicity" paired with "diagnostic criteria" or "diagnosis." Also, fatal cases of serotonin toxicity identified from a recent systematic review were independently examined to determine what diagnostic criteria were met and whether serotonin toxicity or another cause was most likely.

REVIEW OF DIAGNOSIS CRITERIA

Serotonin toxicity is a clinical diagnosis, four diagnostic criteria (Sternbach, Serotonin Syndrome Scale, Radomski, and Hunter) have been proposed. However, the Serotonin Syndrome Scale has not been validated in patients with serotonin toxicity and only utilized in those on a serotonergic agent. The remaining three criteria are utilized more widely but have undergone little refinement or validation.

REVIEW OF FATAL CASES

Shortfalls with diagnostic criteria can be illustrated by examining case fatalities. Of 55 fatal cases reviewed, 12 (22%) were unlikely to be serotonin toxicity. Sternbach and Radomski criteria were met by 25 (45%), 20 (36%) had insufficient data reported and 10 (18%) met an exclusion criterion. Few had sufficient information reported to determine whether Hunter Criteria were met, with only 13 (24%) documented as meeting the criteria, the remaining 42 (76%) had insufficient data.

RESOLVING SHORTFALLS IN CURRENT DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA

As serotonin toxicity is a clinical diagnosis, issues arise when basing the diagnosis on symptom criteria alone, without considering whether the drug/s ingested increase central nervous system serotonin or whether there is an alternative diagnosis. This has resulted in case reports and government warnings for drugs that cannot plausibly cause significant serotonin toxicity (e.g., ondansetron and antipsychotics). We propose when assessing for a serotonin toxidrome, both the causative agent(s) and clinical scenario is considered to determine the likelihood of serotonin toxicity. Then the clinical features assessed, those with a moderate to high prior probability (e.g., serotonergic drug-drug interaction, overdose, recent initiation or increase in dose of serotonergic agent/s) could be diagnosed based on the Hunter criteria. However, those with a low probability (e.g., stable therapeutic doses of a serotonergic agent) require more specific and stringent criteria. Finally, we propose a minimum dataset for case reports/series of serotonin toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

More complete and accurate reporting of serotonin toxicity cases is required in the future, to avoid further misleading associations that are physiologically implausible.

Fatal serotonin syndrome: a systematic review of 56 cases in the literature

INTRODUCTION

Serotonin syndrome (SS) is a drug-induced potentially life-threatening clinical condition. There is a paucity of data on the risk factors, clinical course, and complications associated with fatal SS.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the epidemiological profile, clinical features, and risk factors associated with fatal SS through a systematic review.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE and Google Scholar for case reports, case series, or cohort studies of fatal SS.

RESULTS

Initial database search identified 2326 articles of which 46 (56 patients) were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 42.3 years (range 18-87 years) with female predominance (57%). North America and Europe constitute 80% of the reported fatal SS. The symptoms evolved very rapidly, within 24 h after the administration of serotonergic drugs in 59% of the cases. Fever (61%) was the most common symptom, followed by seizure (36%) and tremors (30%). The mean temperature in the reported cases (25 patients) was 41.6 ± 1.3 °C (range 38.3-43.5 °C). SS was reported to occur with the maintenance dosage of serotonergic agents, after initiation of the drug for the first time, and addition of the drugs for the development of another unrelated illness. Creatine kinase (CK) activities were elevated (>3 times of the upper limit of normal) in eighteen patients, and it was very high (>25,000 IU/L) in four patients. Presence of high grade fever, seizures, and high CK activities may be associated with severe SS. Nine patients (16%) received 5-HT2A antagonists as a therapy. About 50% of patients died within 24 h of the onset of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

While fatal SS is rare, frequently observed features include hyperthermia, seizures, and high CK activities. Cyproheptadine use appears infrequent for these patients.

Serotonin syndrome due to an overdose of moclobemide?

Serotonin syndrome, a triad of autonomic instability, altered mental status and neuromuscular abnormalities, is usually attributed to serotonergic overdoses. Moclobemide is a new selective monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) that generally causes mild, self-limited gastrointestinal and central nervous system effects after ingestion. We present a case of serotonin syndrome that occurred after moclobemide overdose, and discuss the recognition and treatment of this important condition. Serotonin syndrome may become increasingly common because of the liberal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, new MAOIs and other agents such as codeine and meperidine, which have the potential for harmful interaction.

Drug interactions and fluoxetine: a commentary from a clinician's perspective

This commentary suggests that clinicians require an additional perspective to that expressed in Wernicke's review. Clinicians must consider the relative risks, because even small differences may be a reason to adjust usage of a particular drug. As early as 1993, reviews noted a 'serious' interaction potential. Also, the product information requires supplementation because it does not provide the emphasis on predictable interactions that clinicians require. An extensive basis in experimental pharmacology provides the foundations for our knowledge of cytochrome P450 interactions which predict the effects on the levels of other drugs. This work has been confirmed in human studies. Adverse outcomes related to fluoxetine interactions are relatively frequent and sometimes fatal. Patients may suffer serious and irreversible ill-effects from the increased risk of many manifestations of toxicity, and the cost of resultant medico-legal settlements is considerable. A clinician who balances risks may use fluoxetine less frequently.

The pathophysiology of serotonin toxicity in animals and humans: implications for diagnosis and treatment

Serotonin toxicity (or serotonin syndrome) has become an increasingly common and important clinical problem in medicine over the last 15 years with the introduction of many new antidepressants that can cause increased levels of serotonin (5-HT) in the central nervous system (CNS). Severe and life-threatening cases are almost exclusively a result of combinations of antidepressants (usually monoamine oxidase inhibitors and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors). Unfortunately, the term serotonin syndrome has a number of quite different meanings, and many people writing on this subject have failed to differentiate them. This has led to false conclusions regarding the 5-HT receptor subtypes responsible for the life-threatening effects in animal and human toxicity, and suggestions of ineffective treatment strategies. This review primarily addresses the serotonin receptor subtypes that underlie the clinical manifestations of excess CNS serotonin in humans and animals, and their implications for diagnosis and treatment. More specific diagnostic criteria for serotonin toxicity are required to identify situations when specific antidotes are likely to be useful. However, the mainstay of treatment of severe cases is good supportive care and early intubation and paralysis in life-threatening serotonin toxicity.

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors, opioid analgesics and serotonin toxicity

Toxicity resulting from excessive intra-synaptic serotonin, historically referred to as serotonin syndrome, is now understood to be an intra-synaptic serotonin concentration-related phenomenon. Recent research more clearly delineates serotonin toxicity as a discreet toxidrome characterized by clonus, hyper-reflexia, hyperthermia and agitation. Serotonergic side-effects occur with serotonergic drugs, and overdoses of serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SRIs) frequently produce marked serotonergic side-effects, and in 15% of cases, moderate serotonergic toxicity, but not to a severe degree, which produces hyperthermia and risk of death. It is only combinations of serotonergic drugs acting by different mechanisms that are capable of raising intra-synaptic serotonin to a level that is life threatening. The combination that most commonly does this is a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) drug combined with any SRI. There are a number of lesser-known drugs that are MAOIs, such as linezolid and moclobemide; and some opioid analgesics have serotonergic activity. These properties when combined can precipitate life threatening serotonin toxicity. Possibly preventable deaths are still occurring. Knowledge of the properties of these drugs will therefore help to ensure that problems can be avoided in most clinical situations, and treated appropriately (with 5-HT(2A) antagonists for severe cases) if they occur. The phenylpiperidine series opioids, pethidine (meperidine), tramadol, methadone and dextromethorphan and propoxyphene, appear to be weak serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and have all been involved in serotonin toxicity reactions with MAOIs (including some fatalities). Morphine, codeine, oxycodone and buprenorphine are known not to be SRIs, and do not precipitate serotonin toxicity with MAOIs.

Moclobemide poisoning: toxicokinetics and occurrence of serotonin toxicity

AIMS

To investigate the spectrum of toxicity of moclobemide overdose, the occurrence of serotonin toxicity, and to estimate toxicokinetic parameters.

METHODS

All moclobemide overdoses presenting over a 10-year period to the Hunter Area Toxicology Service were reviewed. Clinical features, complications, length of stay (LOS) and intensive care (ICU) admission rate were extracted from a standardized, prospectively collected database. Comparisons were made between moclobemide alone and moclobemide with a serotonergic coingestant poisoning. Serotonin toxicity was defined by a combination of Sternbach's criteria and a clinical toxicologist's diagnosis. In five patients serial moclobemide concentrations were measured. Time to maximal plasma concentration (Tmax), peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and terminal elimination half-lives were estimated.

RESULTS

Of 106 included patients, 33 ingested moclobemide alone, 21 ingested moclobemide with another serotonergic agent (in some cases in therapeutic doses) and 52 ingested moclobemide with a nonserotonergic agent. Eleven (55%) of 21 patients coingesting a serotonergic drug developed serotonin toxicity, which was significantly more than one (3%) of 33 moclobemide-alone overdoses (odds ratio 35, 95% confidence interval 4, 307; P < 0.0001). In six of these 21 cases severe serotonin toxicity developed with temperature >38.5 degrees C and muscle rigidity requiring intubation and paralysis. The 21 patients had a significantly increased LOS (34 h) compared with moclobemide alone overdoses (12 h) (P < 0.0001) and a significantly increased ICU admission rate of 57% vs. 3% (P < 0.0001). Time to peak plasma concentration was delayed in two patients where prepeak samples were obtained. Cmax increased slightly with dose, but all three patients ingesting > or = 6 g vomited or had charcoal. The mean elimination half-life of moclobemide in the five patients in whom serial moclobemide concentrations were measured was 6.3 h and elimination was first order in all cases. There was no evidence of a dose-dependent increase in half-life.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of moclobemide alone in overdose are minor, even with massive ingestions. However, moclobemide overdose in combination with a serotonergic agent (even in normal therapeutic doses) can cause severe serotonin toxicity. The elimination half-life is prolonged by two to four times in overdose, compared with that found in healthy volunteers given therapeutic doses. This may be a result of wide interindividual variation in overall elimination, also seen with therapeutic doses, but appears not to be due to saturation of normal elimination pathways.

The Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria: simple and accurate diagnostic decision rules for serotonin toxicity

BACKGROUND

There are difficulties with the diagnosis of serotonin toxicity, particularly with the use of Sternbach's criteria.

AIM

To improve the criteria for diagnosing clinically significant serotonin toxicity.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data

METHODS

We studied all patients admitted to the Hunter Area Toxicology Service (HATS) following an overdose of a serotonergic drug from January 1987 to November 2002 (n = 2222). Main outcomes were: diagnosis of serotonin toxicity by a clinical toxicologist, fulfillment of Sternbach's criteria and treatment with a serotonin receptor (5-HT(2A)) antagonist. A learning dataset of 473 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-alone overdoses was used to determine individual clinical features predictive of serotonin toxicity by univariate analysis. Decision rules using CART analysis were developed, and tested on the dataset of all serotonergic overdose admissions.

RESULTS

Numerous clinical features were associated with serotonin toxicity, but only clonus (inducible, spontaneous or ocular), agitation, diaphoresis, tremor and hyperreflexia were needed for accurate prediction of serotonin toxicity as diagnosed by a clinical toxicologist. Although the learning dataset did not include patients with life-threatening serotonin toxicity, hypertonicity and maximum temperature > 38 degrees C were universal in such patients; these features were therefore added. Using these seven clinical features, decision rules (the Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria) were developed. These new criteria were simpler, more sensitive (84% vs. 75%) and more specific (97% vs. 96%) than Sternbach's criteria.

DISCUSSION

These redefined criteria for serotonin toxicity should be more sensitive to serotonin toxicity and less likely to yield false positives.

[Drug interactions and the anesthesiologist]

Modern anesthesiology employs the combined administration of several drugs belonging to different pharmacological classes. Additionally, anesthesiologists are facing the challenge of polypharmacy regimens utilized by patients considered for surgical treatment When drugs are combined, the pharmacological effect may considerably differ from the individually expected properties. This may be beneficial or potentially lead to adverse drug reactions harming the patient. The incidence of drug interaction increases exponentially with the number of drugs administered. Depending on the mechanism involved, drug interactions can be classified as pharmaceutical, pharmacodynamic, or pharmacokinetic. Although there are enormous possibilities for adverse drug reactions nd the complexity is hard to identify, prediction of drug interaction is possible. Besides recognizing the general risk factors, fundamental knowledge of basic and clinical pharmacology is important to prevent serious or fatal drug interactions before they occur.

Moclobemide: therapeutic use and clinical studies

Moclobemide is a reversible inhibitor of monoamine-oxidase-A (RIMA) and has been extensively evaluated in the treatment of a wide spectrum of depressive disorders and less extensively studied in anxiety disorders. Nearly all meta-analyses and most comparative studies indicated that in the acute management of depression this drug is more efficacious than placebo and as efficacious as tricyclic (or some heterocyclic) antidepressants or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). There is a growing evidence that moclobemide is not inferior to other antidepressants in the treatment of subtypes of depression, such as dysthymia, endogenous (unipolar and bipolar), reactive, atypical, agitated, and retarded depression as with other antidepressants limited evidence suggests that moclobemide has consistent long-term efficacy. However, more controlled studies addressing this issue are needed. For patients with bipolar depression the risk of developing mania seems to be not higher with moclobemide than with other antidepressants. The effective therapeutic dose range for moclobemide in most acute phase trials was 300 to 600 mg, divided in 2 to 3 doses. While one controlled trial and one long-term open-label study found moclobemide to be efficacious in social phobia, three controlled trials subsequently revealed either no effect or less robust effects with the tendency of higher doses (600 - 900 mg/d) to be more efficacious. Two comparative trials demonstrated moclobemide to be as efficacious as fluoxetine or clomipramine in patients suffering from panic disorder. Placebo-controlled trials in this indication are, however, still lacking. A relationship between the plasma concentration of moclobemide and its therapeutic efficacy is not apparent but a positive correlation with adverse events has been found. Dizziness, nausea and insomnia occurred more frequently on moclobemide than on placebo. Due to negligible anticholinergic and antihistaminic actions, moclobemide has been better tolerated than tri- or heterocyclic antidepressants. Gastrointestinal side effects and, especially, sexual dysfunction were much less frequent with moclobemide than with SSRIs. Unlike irreversible MAO-inhibitors, moclobemide has a negligible propensity to induce hypertensive crisis after ingestion of tyramine-rich food ("cheese-reaction"). Therefore, dietary restrictions are not as strict. However, with moclobemide doses above 900 mg/d the risk of interaction with ingested tyramine might become clinically relevant. After multiple dosing the oral bioavailability of moclobemide reaches almost 100%. At therapeutic doses, moclobemide lacks significant negative effects on psychomotor performance, cognitive function or cardiovascular system. Due to the relative freedom from these side effects, moclobemide is particularly attractive in the treatment of elderly patients. Moclobemide is a substrate of CYP2C19. Although it acts as an inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6, relatively few clinically important drug interactions involving moclobemide have been reported. It is relatively safe even in overdose. The drug has a short plasma elimination half-life that allows switching to an alternative agent within 24 h. Since it is well tolerated, therapeutic doses can often be reached rapidly upon onset of treatment. Steady-state plasma levels are reached approximately at one week following dose adjustment. Patients with renal dysfunction require no dose reduction in contrast to patients with severe hepatic impairment. Cases of refractory depression might improve with a combination of moclobemide with other antidepressants, such as clomipramine or a SSRI. Since this combination has rarely been associated with a potentially lethal serotonin syndrome, it requires lower entry doses, a slower dose titration and a more careful monitoring of patients. Combination therapy with moclobemide and other serotonergic agents, or opioids, should be undertaken with caution, although no serious adverse events have been published with therapeutic doses of moclobemide to date. On the basis of animal data the combined use of moclobemide with pethidine or dextropropoxyphene should be avoided. There is no evidence that moclobemide would increase body weight or produce seizures. Some preclinical data suggest that moclobemide may have anticonvulsant property.

Antidepressants, old and new. A review of their adverse effects and toxicity in overdose

The newer antidepressants are as efficacious as the older agents in the treatment of depression. They have a side effect profile that is different from the older drugs and are generally better tolerated. Drug-drug interactions do exist with some of these agents and can usually be predicted from knowledge of their metabolism. When taken in overdose as the sole agents they are rarely fatal; seizures, nausea, vomiting, decreased level of consciousness, and tachycardia are common. In combination with other drugs, toxicity can be more severe. The serotonin syndrome can occur with many of these drugs, and the emergency physician must be vigilant in the evaluation of the overdose patient. CAs and older MAOIs are still in use and remain dangerous when taken in overdose. Patients asymptomatic after a period of observation in the ED usually can be discharged after psychiatric evaluation, when it is required.

Serotonin syndrome. Presentation of 2 cases and review of the literature

Serotonin syndrome is an underreported complication of pharmacotherapy that has been relatively ignored in the medical literature. We discuss 2 recent cases seen at our institution and 39 cases described in the English-language literature since 1995. We found that patients with serotonin syndrome most often (74.3%) presented within 24 hours of medication initiation, overdose, or change in dosage. The most common presenting symptoms and signs were confusion, agitation, diaphoresis, tachycardia, myoclonus, and hyperreflexia. The prevalences of hypertension, coma/unresponsiveness, seizures, and death were not as prominent in our study as previously reported, perhaps reflecting earlier recognition and intervention. The most common therapeutic intervention was supportive care alone (48% of patients). The use of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) antagonists such as cyproheptadine, however, has become more common and might reduce the duration of symptoms. Only 1 death occurred, and most patients (57.5%) had complete resolution of their symptoms within 24 hours of presentation. The increased use of serotonergic agents (alone and in combination) across multiple medical disciplines presents the possibility that the prevalence and clinical significance of this condition will rise in the future. Internists will need to be increasingly aware of and prepared for this pharmacologic complication. Prevention, early recognition of the clinical presentation, identification and removal of the offending agents, supportive care, and specific pharmacologic therapy are all important to the successful management of serotonin syndrome.

The serotonin syndrome and its treatment

Serotonin syndrome is caused by drug induced excess of intrasynaptic 5-hydroxytryptamine. The clinical manifestations are mediated by the action of 5-hydroxytryptamine on various subtypes of serotonin receptors. There is no effective drug treatment established. The history of the treatment of serotonin syndrome with 5-hydroxytryptamine blocking drugs is reviewed. A literature search was undertaken using both Medline and a manual search of the older literature. Reports of cases treated with the 5-HT2 blockers cyproheptadine and chlorpromazine were identified and analysed. There is some evidence suggesting the efficacy of chlorpromazine and cyproheptadine in the treatment of serotonin syndrome. The evidence for cyproheptadine is less substantial, perhaps because the dose of cyproheptadine necessary to ensure blockade of brain 5-HT2 receptors is 20-30 mg, which is higher than that used in the cases reported to date (4-16 mg).

Fatal combined intoxication with new antidepressants. Human cases and an experimental study of postmortem moclobemide redistribution

Three cases are presented in which death was caused by suicidal intoxication with moclobemide in combination with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Both antidepressant drug types are considered to be relatively safe with regard to lethal overdose. However, the combination may cause the serotonin syndrome, a condition with a high mortality rate. In one of the cases, there was clinical information consistent with the serotonin syndrome, in the two other cases, there was no information of the clinical course. Postmortem redistribution of the selective monoamine oxidase inhibitor moclobemide was investigated in a rat model. Postmortem concentrations in blood from the vena cava and the heart were found to be in good accordance with antemortem concentrations. Postmortem concentrations in vitreous humour and various tissues were also measured. The apparent volume of distribution was calculated to be 0.95 +/- 0.10 l/kg, which is in the same range as that reported in man.

Review of the results from clinical studies on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of mirtazapine for the treatment of patients with major depression

Mirtazapine is a presynaptic alpha-2 antagonist that has dual action by increasing noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission. The enhancement of serotonergic neurotransmission is specifically mediated via 5-HT1 receptors because mirtazapine is a postsynaptic serotonergic 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 antagonist. In addition, mirtazapine has only a weak affinity for 5-HT1 receptors and has very weak muscarinic anticholinergic and histamine (H1) antagonist properties. As a consequence of its unique pharmacodynamic properties, mirtazapine is an effective, safe and well-tolerated addition to the antidepressant armamentarium. Mirtazapine is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract following oral administration, and it is extensively metabolized in the liver to four metabolites via demethylation and hydroxylation, followed by glucuronide conjugation. The unconjugated desmethyl metabolite is pharmacologically less active than the parent compound. Mirtazapine lacks auto-induction of hepatic isoenzymes. Although mirtazapine is a substrate of P450 isoenzymes 1A2, 2D6 and 3A4, in vitro studies show that it is not a potent inhibitor or inducer of any of these enzymes. Mirtazapine has been evaluated in a worldwide clinical development program involving approximately 4500 patients. Controlled clinical trials involving almost 2800 mirtazapine-treated patients have demonstrated the compound to be effective for the treatment of moderate-to-serve major depression. Mirtazapine was consistently superior to placebo, and equivalent in efficacy to the tricyclic antidepressants amitriptyline, doxepin and clomipramine, but with an improved tolerability profile. Mirtazapine has shown a rapid onset of action in patients with predominantly severe depressive illness in a comparative study against fluoxetine. Mirtazapine has a unique tolerability profile, since the specific postsynaptic 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptor blockade of mirtazapine provides early antidepressant effects without causing unwanted serotonin-related side-effects. Transient somnolence, hyperphagia and weight gain are the most commonly reported adverse events, which may be attributed to the antihistaminic (H1) activity of mirtazapine at low doses. Somnolence, the most commonly reported side-effect, appears to be less frequent at higher dosages. Mirtazapine also demonstrates important anxiolytic and sleep-improving effects, which may be related to its pharmacodynamic properties. In addition, mirtazapine does not appear to be associated with sexual dysfunction. Mirtazapine has shown no significant cardiovascular adverse effects at multiples of 7 to 22 times the maximum recommended dose. Mirtazapine is a unique addition to the antidepressant armamentarium as first-line therapy in patients with major depression and symptoms of anxiety/agitation or anxiety/somatization or complaints of insomnia and as a useful alternative in depressed patients who do not adequately respond to or are intolerant of tricyclic antidepressants or serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors.

Serotonin syndrome resulting from drug interactions

We describe six patients diagnosed with serotonin syndrome after exposure to drugs with serotonergic activity. Drug interactions occurred as a result of a combination of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors or monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Management included supportive care and the use of non-specific serotonin antagonists (cyproheptadine, benzodiazepines and chlorpromazine). All patients made uneventful recoveries.

Serotonin syndrome: history and risk

This review focuses on the history of investigations into the behavioural reaction resulting from excess stimulation of post-synaptic 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors and the relative risk of this occurring with different combinations of drugs. Other aspects, particularly treatment with 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists, are reviewed in a recent separate paper [44]. The first human case was in 1955 and animal work had defined the characteristic features by 1958, and established they were lessened by chlorpromazine. Substantial evidence of a 'dose-effect' relationship existed by 1984. The relative risk with different drug combinations is assessed from available evidence and argued to be strongly associated with the degree of elevation of 5-hydroxytryptamine, which is greatest following combinations of irreversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase A and B with potent serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The various serotonergic drugs that may be implicated in serotonin syndrome are tabulated and discussed in relation to the relative risk. It is suggested that the proposed 'diagnostic criteria' for serotonin syndrome are inappropriate since there is a continuous spectrum from side effects to toxicity. The term 'serotonin syndrome' may encourage the presumption that it is an idiosyncratic response, as neuroleptic malignant syndrome is usually considered to be. The terms 'toxic serotomimetic reaction' or 'toxic serotonin syndrome' may be preferable alternatives. The differences between serotonin syndrome and neuroleptic malignant syndrome are highlighted with examples from difficult or questionable cases in the recent literature. It is proposed that more systematic national collection of toxicity data is essential in order to quantify the relative risk of serotonin syndrome with various combinations of serotonergic drugs.

Attenuation of serotonin-induced contractures in skeletal muscle from malignant hyperthermia-susceptible patients with dantrolene

BACKGROUND

Porcine malignant hyperthermia (MH) can be triggered by administration of certain serotonin2 receptor agonists. Pretreatment with dantrolene completely abolished serotonin-induced MH. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the serotonin2 receptor agonist 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI) in skeletal muscle specimens from MH-susceptible (MHS) and MH-nonsusceptible (MHN) patients following pretreatment with dantrolene.

METHOD

We used muscle specimens surplus to diagnostic requirements from 12 MHS and 13 MHN patients in this study. In the first experiment, DOI 0.02 mM was added to the organ bath. In the second experiment, muscle specimens were preincubated with dantrolene 0.5 microM or 1.0 microM, respectively, for 10 min before DOI 0.02 mM was administered.

RESULTS

Administration of DOI 0.02 mM induced contractures in muscle specimens from MHS and MHN patients. Contracture development started significantly earlier in MHS than in MHN specimens. In MHS muscle the maximum contracture was significantly greater than in MHN. Pretreatment with dantrolene significantly delayed the start of contracture development in MHS muscles, whereas in MHN muscles no contractures were observed after dantrolene. The contracture maximum was significantly reduced in MHS.

CONCLUSION

The acceleration of DOI-induced contracture development in skeletal muscle specimens from MHS patients indicates that an altered serotonin system might be involved in human MH. Dantrolene effectively delayed serotonin-induced contractures. Further investigations are needed to determine whether serotonin2 receptors of skeletal muscle from MHS subjects are altered in function or structure, or whether this response is a secondary phenomenon.

Serotonin syndrome. A clinical update

Serotonin syndrome is characterized by varied degrees of cognitive, autonomic, and neuromuscular dysfunction and can only be produced by drug therapy that increases central nervous system serotonin neurotransmission. Information gained from a retrospective review of 127 cases of serotonin syndrome is presented. It is not uncommon for severe cases of serotonin syndrome to be confused with neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Treatment is mainly supportive, but specific pharmacologic therapy with serotonin antagonists may be potentially beneficial.

An appraisal of the pharmacological and toxicological effects of a single oral administration of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in the rat

This study examined some acute pharmacological and toxicological effects of 3,4 methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "Ecstasy") over a range of doses (20, 40, 80, 160 and 320 mg/kg orally) in adult female rats. Deaths were observed from the 40 mg/kg MDMA group onwards. Reductions in body weight change, food and water intake were found in the 80 mg/kg group, whilst food intake alone was reduced in the 20 and 40 mg/kg groups. Significant hyperthermic responses were found over the first 8 hr following MDMA administration which were dose-related. A significant hyperactivity of approximately 9 hr duration was observed in the 20 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg groups, whereas there was evidence of a serotonin syndrome in the higher dosage groups. Thus, acute oral administration of MDMA results in a variety of measurable responses. The cause of death in this study is probably a combination of serotonin syndrome and hyperthermia.

[Serotonin syndrome: critical review of the literature]

Since Sternbach's first review, serotonin syndrome has been reported many times. Our purpose was to examine this concept's pertinence, utility and meaning. Its physiopathology remains unclear: 5-HT1A receptors activation is certain, but others mechanisms and individual or family factors could be also involved. Appearance circumstances are more various than first expected. The concept of serotonin syndrome seems to bring together entities that differ in physiopathology and seriousness, and we propose to distinguish between serotonin syndrome and other types of syndromes. Knowing serotonin syndrome is useful both for prevention and for recognizing it as a potentially lethal emergency.

Serotonin syndrome and drug combinations: focus on MAOI and RIMA

Serotonin syndrome is a potentially life-threatening complication of psychopharmacological drug therapy. The syndrome is produced most often by the concurrent use of two or more drugs that increase brainstem serotonin activity and is often unrecognized because of the varied and nonspecific nature of its symptomatology. Serotonin syndrome is characterized by alterations in cognition, behavior, autonomic nervous system function and neuromuscular activity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility that any serotomimetic substance alone or in combination may give rise to serotonin syndrome, that this condition is not confined to the use of newly introduced substances, and that the newer reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase type A (RIMAs) are at decreased risk for this phenomenon than older, classical (irreversible) monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI). This is a hypothesis-generating study based on a review of all published cases of adverse effects arising in patients receiving serotomimetic substances or combinations. A wide range of substances were involved in 226 cases published worldwide since 1950 where there was any use of single or combined serotomimetic treatments. Of the 226 cases, 105 fulfilled the Sternbach criteria for serotonin syndrome. Some classes of drugs and individual substances were more commonly represented. This may arise from product utilization patterns or from the specific properties of the individual products. However, moclobemide, a RIMA, was represented in only 9 of the 226 published cases and 3 of the 105 defined serotonin syndromes, either in multi-drug combinations and/or in mixed drug overdose. One explanation for the small number of cases involving RIMAs could be the reversibility of these new products. In addition the small number of reports on moclobemide could be an effect of its short availability in routine use during the period of the literature review. We conclude that a spectrum of serotonergic hyperactivity, through to a defined serotonin syndrome, may arise from the use or combination of any serotomimetic substance, as this is a consequence of the mechanism involved, rather than the use of any specific product such as the new antidepressants. We further conclude that this condition is not confined to the use of newly introduced substances and that the newer reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase type A (RIMAs) may be at decreased risk for this phenomenon than older, classical (irreversible) (MAOI). Given that a spectrum of serotonergic hyperactivity was observed, this analysis prompts redefinition of the currently accepted criteria for serotonin syndrome.

In vitro adsorption study of fluoxetine onto activated charcoal at gastric and intestinal pH using high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detector

BACKGROUND

This in vitro investigation was performed to study the adsorption characteristics of fluoxetine to activated charcoal and its commercial formulation Carbomix powder in simulated gastric (pH = 1.2) and intestinal (pH = 7.2) fluid environments.

METHODS

Solutions containing fluoxetine and charcoal were incubated at 37 degrees C for one hour. Reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography was used for the determination of free fluoxetine concentrations (range 0.2-8 micrograms/mL) in the diluted filtrate.

RESULTS

The maximum adsorption capacities at pH 1.2 for activated charcoal and Carbomix were 223 and 333 mg/g, respectively; at pH 7.2 they were 301 and 453 mg/g, respectively. The affinity constant values at pH 1.2 of activated charcoal and Carbomix were 441 and 122 L/g, respectively, while at pH 7.2 they were 482 and 589 L/g, respectively, indicating a strong binding of fluoxetine onto charcoals.

CONCLUSIONS

Relative to the toxic and lethal doses in cases of fluoxetine intoxications, both types of charcoals tested were found effective for adsorption at gastric and intestinal pH. Adsorbed fluoxetine was significantly increased at intestinal pH, consistent with predominant adsorption of the undissociated form of the drug. We conclude that activated charcoal and Carbomix have adsorptive properties appropriate to medical treatment in cases of fluoxetine overdose.