[Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome : A rare cause of stroke]

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a complex and etiologically diverse neurovascular disorder that typically presents with severe thunderclap headaches (TCH) as the primary symptom, accompanied by reversible vasoconstriction of the cerebral arteries. The clinical course may include focal neurological deficits or epileptic seizures. There are two types: idiopathic RCVS and secondary RCVS, the latter triggered by various substances, medical interventions, or diseases. In clinical practice, various medical specialists may initially encounter this condition, underscoring the importance of accurate recognition and diagnosis of RCVS. The clinical course often appears monophasic and self-limiting, with recurrences reported in only 1.7% of cases annually. Complications such as cerebral hemorrhages and cerebral ischemia can lead to death in 5-10% of cases. This article utilizes a case study to explore RCVS, its complications, and the diagnostic procedures involved.

Association between impaired dynamic cerebral autoregulation and BBB disruption in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome

BACKGROUND

Half of the sufferers of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) exhibit imaging-proven blood-brain barrier disruption. The pathogenesis of blood-brain barrier disruption in RCVS remains unclear and mechanism-specific intervention is lacking. We speculated that cerebrovascular dysregulation might be associated with blood-brain barrier disruption in RCVS. Hence, we aimed to evaluate whether the dynamic cerebral autoregulation is altered in patients with RCVS and could be associated with blood-brain barrier disruption.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted from 2019 to 2021 at headache clinics of a national tertiary medical center. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation was evaluated in all participants. The capacity of the dynamic cerebral autoregulation to damp the systemic hemodynamic changes, i.e., phase shift and gain between the cerebral blood flow and blood pressure waveforms in the very-low- and low-frequency bands were calculated by transfer function analysis. The mean flow correlation index was also calculated. Patients with RCVS received 3-dimensional isotropic contrast-enhanced T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging to visualize blood-brain barrier disruption.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients with RCVS (41.9 ± 9.8 years old, 29 females) and 45 matched healthy controls (41.4 ± 12.5 years old, 29 females) completed the study. Nineteen of the patients had blood-brain barrier disruption. Compared to healthy controls, patients with RCVS had poorer dynamic cerebral autoregulation, indicated by higher gain in very-low-frequency band (left: 1.6 ± 0.7, p = 0.001; right: 1.5 ± 0.7, p = 0.003; healthy controls: 1.1 ± 0.4) and higher mean flow correlation index (left: 0.39 ± 0.20, p = 0.040; right: 0.40 ± 0.18, p = 0.017; healthy controls: 0.31 ± 0.17). Moreover, patients with RCVS with blood-brain barrier disruption had worse dynamic cerebral autoregulation, as compared to those without blood-brain barrier disruption, by having less phase shift in very-low- and low-frequency bands, and higher mean flow correlation index.

CONCLUSIONS

Dysfunctional dynamic cerebral autoregulation was observed in patients with RCVS, particularly in those with blood-brain barrier disruption. These findings suggest that impaired cerebral autoregulation plays a pivotal role in RCVS pathophysiology and may be relevant to complications associated with blood-brain barrier disruption by impaired capacity of maintaining stable cerebral blood flow under fluctuating blood pressure.

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: A review of pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and treatment

Reversible segmental narrowing of the intracranial arteries has been described since several decades in numerous clinical settings, using variable nosology. Twenty-one years ago, we tentatively proposed the unifying concept that these entities, based on similar clinical-imaging features, represented a single cerebrovascular syndrome. This "reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome" or RCVS has now come of age. A new International Classification of Diseases code, (ICD-10, I67.841) has been established, enabling larger-scale studies. The RCVS2 scoring system provides high accuracy in confirming RCVS diagnosis and excluding mimics such as primary angiitis of the central nervous system. Several groups have characterized its clinical-imaging features. RCVS predominantly affects women. Recurrent worst-ever (thunderclap) headaches are typical at onset. While initial brain imaging is often normal, approximately one-third to half develop complications such as convexity subarachnoid hemorrhages, lobar hemorrhages, ischemic strokes located in arterial "watershed" territories and reversible edema, alone or in combination. Vasoconstriction evolves over hours to days, first affecting distal and then the more proximal arteries. An overlap between RCVS and primary thunderclap headache, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, transient global amnesia, and other conditions has been recognized. The pathophysiology remains largely unknown. Management is mostly symptomatic: headache relief with analgesics and oral calcium-channel blockers, removal of vasoconstrictive factors, and avoidance of glucocorticoids that can significantly worsen outcome. Intra-arterial vasodilator infusions provide variable success. Overall, 90-95% of admitted patients achieve complete or major resolution of symptoms and clinical deficits within days to weeks. Recurrence is exceptional, although 5% can later develop isolated thunderclap headaches with or without mild cerebral vasoconstriction.

Reversible cerebral Vasoconstriction syndrome intERnational CollaborativE (REVERCE) network: Study protocol and rationale of a multicentre research collaboration

INTRODUCTION

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a rare, but increasingly recognised cerebrovascular condition with an estimated annual age-standardised incidence of approximately three cases per million. Knowledge about risk factors and triggering conditions and information about prognosis and optimal treatment in these patients are limited.

METHODS

The REversible cerebral Vasoconstriction syndrome intERnational CollaborativE (REVERCE) project aims to elucidate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of RCVS by collecting individual patient data from four countries (France, Italy, Taiwan and South Korea) in the setting of a multicentric study. All patients with a diagnosis of definite RCVS will be included. Data on the distribution of risk factors and triggering conditions, imaging data, neurological complications, functional outcome, risk of recurrent vascular events and death and finally the use of specific treatments will be collected. Subgroup analyses will be made based on age, gender, aetiology, ethnicity and geographical region of residence.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for the REVERCE study will be obtained from national or local institutional review boards in the participating centres. When needed, a standardised data transfer agreement will be provided for participating centres. We plan dissemination of our results in peer-reviewed international scientific journals and through conference presentations. We expect that the results of this unique study will lead to better understanding of clinical and epidemiological characteristics of RCVS patients.

Secondary headaches - red and green flags and their significance for diagnostics

A small percentage of patients suffer from a secondary headache syndrome. It is imperative that clinicians are able to differentiate primary headache syndromes from secondary headache syndromes, as failure to do so significantly worsens morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in our understanding of pathobiological mechanisms offer useful information on these enigmatic disorders. We now understand that the causes of secondary headache syndromes can vary significantly - these may be infectious, inflammatory, vascular, traumatic or structural in origin. A well-taken history and targeted physical examination coupled with appropriate investigations can enable these syndromes to be recognized consistently and thus allow their timely and appropriate treatment. Along with their epidemiology, some of their key characteristics shall thus be discussed in this review so as to aid the busy clinician at the bedside. Red flags including sudden onset, high pain intensity, pattern of change of a preexisting headache, focal neurological signs or seizure, systemic signs and precipitation by physical activity can guide the clinician to suspect a secondary headache. Importantly a preexisting headache is not an exclusion of a secondary headache - it might even be a predisposition in certain cases.

Headache Attributed to Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome (RCVS)

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a condition with variable outcomes presenting a new onset thunderclap headache accompanied by focal neurological symptoms or seizures. It can be idiopathic or arise secondarily to a variety of trigger factors. The condition is increasingly recognized in clinical practice, but many facets remain poorly understood. This article aims to clarify the headache characteristics in RCVS, the temporal association of angiographic findings, the potential association of the condition with SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the clinical presentation of RCVS in children and is based on a systematic PRISMA search for published analytical or large descriptive observational studies. Data from 60 studies that fulfilled specific criteria were reviewed. Most people with RCVS exhibit a typical thunderclap, explosive, or pulsatile/throbbing headache, or a similar acute and severe headache that takes longer than 1 min to peak. Atypical presentations or absence of headaches are also reported and may be an underrecognized phenotype. In many cases, headaches may persist after resolution of RCVS. Focal deficits or seizures are attributed to associated complications including transient ischemic attacks, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, ischemic stroke, cerebral edema, and intracranial hemorrhage. The peak of vasoconstriction occurs usually within two weeks after clinical onset, possibly following a pattern of centripetal propagation, and tends to resolve completely within 3 months, well after symptoms have subsided. There are a few reports of RCVS occurring in relation to SARS-CoV-2 infection, but potential underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms and etiological associations have not been confirmed. RCVS occurs in children most often in the context of an underlying disease. Overall, the available data in the literature are scattered, and large-scale prospective studies and international collaborations are needed to further characterize the clinical presentation of RCVS.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in patients with COVID-19 infection: is there a link? A systematic review and case report analysis

During the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, several cases of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) and of Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome (RCVS) in COVID-19 patients have been reported, but the link between these syndromes and COVID-19 is unclear. We performed a systematic review, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement to evaluate whether SARS-CoV2 infection or the drugs used to treat it could be deemed potential risk factors for PRES or RCVS. We performed a literature search. We found 70 articles (60 on PRES and 10 on RCVS) concerning n = 105 patients (n = 85 with PRES, n = 20 with RCVS). We analyzed the clinical characteristics of the two populations separately, then performed an inferential analysis to search for other independent risk factors. We found fewer than usual PRES-related (43.9%) and RCVS-related (45%) risk factors in patients with COVID-19. Such a low incidence of risk factors for PRES and RCVS might suggest the involvement of COVID-19 as an additional risk factor for both diseases due to its capability to cause endothelial dysfunction. We discuss the putative mechanisms of endothelial damage by SARS-CoV2 and antiviral drugs which may underlie the development of PRES and RCVS.

Vasoconstriction and long-term headache in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome

BACKGROUND

Angiographic vasoconstriction in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is often undetectable at symptom onset and the diagnosis relies on clinical presentation. Although thunderclap headache is a hallmark feature of RCVS, the incidence and predictors of long-term headaches (LTH) are incompletely understood. Our study aims were twofold: to examine the sensitivity and specificity of a recently developed score (RCVS₂) for vasoconstriction detection in a real-world clinical context and describe the incidence and predictors of LTH beyond the acute phase of RCVS.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with clinical diagnosis of RCVS in a tertiary hospital between 2017 and 2021. We examined associations between demographic factors, comorbidities, medications, imaging characteristics, and LTH (defined as at least one episode present at greater than 6-months follow-up necessitating medication). We separately examined the association between RCVS₂ score and angiographic vasoconstriction and computed its sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive value based on established cutoffs (certain ≥ 5, negative ≤ 2).

RESULTS

We included 55 patients, 50.5 (± 13.7) years; 41 (75%) female. 25 (49%) patients had LTH; only prior history of headache was significantly associated with LTH [OR 4.3, 95% CI (1.1-16.2), p = 0.03]. We found a significant association between RCVS₂ score and angiographic vasoconstriction [OR 1.49, 95% CI (1.18-1.88), p = 0.001]; sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were 64%, 94%, 95% and 58% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 50% of RCVS patients experienced LTH; only prior headache history was associated with its incidence. The RCVS2 score had a significant association with high specificity and positive predictive value for angiographic vasoconstriction in our cohort, validating its utility in improving the accuracy of diagnosis in the clinical setting.

RCVS: by clinicians for clinicians-a narrative review

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome may be underdiagnosed. It can be accompanied by various complications, mainly intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke. The clinical presentation of this condition varies according to its localization. The aims of this review are to raise awareness of the disease, especially in the presence of corresponding risk factors; to connect its precipitating factors, pathophysiology, and complications; and to compare various differential diagnoses of vasoconstriction.

METHODS

A review of the literature in PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar was conducted from May 1997 until May 2022.

RESULTS

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, which is a clinical-radiological syndrome, is mainly characterized by the occurrence of thunderclap headache and widespread vasoconstriction. The most common precipitating factors are the use of vasoactive substances and postpartum status. The pathophysiology is currently assumed to include two mechanisms: sympathetic overactivity and endothelial dysfunction. From these mechanisms, it is possible to derive potential complications as well as the most important differential diagnoses: posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, and primary angiitis of the central nervous system.

CONCLUSION

In general, the outcome of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome is very good. Vasospasm as well as thunderclap headache attacks can be fully reversible, and > 90% of patients are functionally independent at discharge.

[Subdural hematoma with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a case report]

A 71-year-old man had persistent cervical pain secondary to thunderclap headache during sleep. MRI conducted the next morning revealed subdural hematoma and convexity subdural hemorrhage on the right occipital region, and the patient was hospitalized. MRA showed vascular narrowing in the bilateral PCA. Follow-up MRA on day 8 of admission showed aggravated vascular narrowing of PCA, indicative of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS). The patient was treated with a calcium-channel antagonist. Post-discharge MRA showed improvement of PCA narrowing, and the diagnosis of RCVS was confirmed.

Diagnostic Value of Thunderclap Headache and Convexal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage for Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome: A Case Report

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is an underdiagnosed cause of convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage, characterized by thunderclap headache associated with focal and segmental intracranial vasoconstriction. It can appear complications such as intracerebral hemorrhage, seizures, posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy, or ischemic stroke. Our objective is to present the case of a 51-year-old woman with an RCVS diagnosis, who had a normal digital subtraction angiography at the illness onset. We highlight the high diagnostic value of thunderclap headache and convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage. We also highlight the importance of repeating the angiographic studies in the second week when there is strong diagnostic suspicion.

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in children: an update

Headaches are one of the most common neurologic complaints leading to emergency room visits in pediatric patients. Of the different type of headache presentations, thunderclap headaches require a particularly urgent work-up. In children, recurrent thunderclap headaches are more often associated with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) than other etiologies such as subarachnoid hemorrhage. RCVS is a vascular disorder of incompletely understood etiology, characterized by diffuse vasoconstriction of the cerebral arterial vasculature, and commonly associated with recurrent severe headaches. Patients may experience focal neurological deficits, due to hemorrhages, infarcts, and even posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome . Although RCVS has been best characterized in adults, it does occur in children. This review summarizes the presentation of RCVS in children and highlights some of the differences with the adult population.

Fulminant Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome in Breakthrough COVID 19 Infection

COVID 19 infection continues to afflict people worldwide. Neurological complications of COVID infection are common. We report a case of fulminant reversible cerebrovascular constriction syndrome (RCVS) in a patient with breakthrough COVID 19 infection who was fully vaccinated. A 64 year old lady, fully vaccinated 2 months back, presented with headache, drowsiness, partial seizures, visual impairment and quadriplegia. Her nasopharyngeal swab was tested positive for SARS COV2 on real time PCR assay. MRI brain FLAIR images showed multifocal hyperintensities with MR angiogram showing arterial vasoconstriction suggestive of RCVS. Despite initiation of nimodipine, patient's symptoms worsened and she succumbed to sepsis. RCVS following COVID infection has been reported to have a benign outcome. However, despite vaccination, fulminant RCVS following a breakthrough COVID infection was observed in our patient.

Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome and Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome as Syndromes of Cerebrovascular Dysregulation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article describes the causes, clinical and imaging features, management, and prognosis of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), in which the underlying pathophysiology is related to reversible dysregulation of the cerebral vasculature.

RECENT FINDINGS

PRES and RCVS are descriptive terms, each bringing together conditions with similar clinical-imaging manifestations. Headache, visual symptoms, seizures, and confusion occur in both syndromes. RCVS is usually heralded by recurrent thunderclap headaches, whereas encephalopathy and seizures are typical in PRES. In PRES, brain imaging shows reversible vasogenic edema that is typically symmetric and located in subcortical regions (mostly posterior predominant). In RCVS, brain imaging is often normal; cerebral angiography shows segmental vasoconstriction-vasodilatation affecting the circle of Willis arteries and their branches. Aside from shared clinical features, significant imaging overlap exists. Both PRES and RCVS can be complicated by ischemic and hemorrhagic brain lesions; angiographic abnormalities frequently occur in PRES and vasogenic edematous lesions in RCVS. Common triggers (eg, eclampsia, vasoconstrictive and chemotherapeutic agents) have been identified. Abnormal cerebrovascular tone and endothelial dysfunction may explain both syndromes. Management of these syndromes includes the removal of identified triggers, symptomatic treatment of headache or seizures, and moderate blood pressure control. Both syndromes are self-limited, with clinical recovery occurring within days to weeks. Long-term deficits and mortality are uncommon.

SUMMARY

PRES and RCVS have been well characterized and acknowledged to have significant overlap. Advances in our understanding of pathophysiology and risk factors for poor outcome are expected to optimize the management of these not uncommon syndromes.

Type of headache at onset and risk for complications in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome

BACKGROUND

In a recent Italian study, 30% of patients with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) presented without thunderclap headache (TCH), and tended to present more severe forms of RCVS than patients with TCH. We aimed to analyze the risk for complications of RCVS in patients with and without TCH at onset.

METHODS

In a pooled cohort of 345 French patients with RCVS, we compared patients with and without TCH at onset regarding rates of neurological complications, and the functional outcome at 3 months.

RESULTS

As compared to the 281 patients with TCH at onset, the 64 patients without TCH had a higher risk for any neurological complication (61% vs. 24%, OR 4.9, 95% CI 2.8-8.7, p < 0.001). The association was strongest for cervical artery dissections (28% vs. 5%, OR 8.1, 95% CI 3.7-17.6, p < 0.001), followed by posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (17% vs. 3%, OR 7.1, 95% CI 2.7-18.4, p < 0.001), seizures (9% vs. 2.5%, OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.3-12.5, p = 0.019), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (41% vs. 16%, OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.9-6.3, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the risk for any neurological complication remained significantly elevated in the absence of TCH (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.8-6.8, p < 0.001). The functional outcome was equal in both groups, with a modified Rankin scale score of 0-1 in ≥90% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Absence of TCH at onset might predict a higher risk of complications in RCVS. Our results warrant further multicentric studies to prove this finding.

Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome Associated With Fluoxetine

BACKGROUND

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is an increasingly recognized neurological syndrome that typically presents with a severe headache. The proposed etiology is transient and segmental constriction of cerebral arteries, which in severe cases can lead to cerebral ischemia. Multiple case reports have been identified associating the use of serotonergic medications with this syndrome.

OBJECTIVE

A review of the literature describing RCVS in patients taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other serotonergic medications is summarized. This report also describes the case of a 32-year-old woman with a complicated psychiatric history diagnosed with RCVS who presented with progressive cerebral ischemia despite intensive medical intervention. Ischemic progression did not relent until her home medication fluoxetine was recognized as the likely etiology and discontinued. The psychiatric management of this patient is described after fluoxetine was discontinued. Other potential psychiatric treatments for patients with a history of RCVS are discussed.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed with the following keywords: antidepressant, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, serotonin, fluoxetine, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, RCVS, and Call-Fleming syndrome.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were identified to have RCVS with associated use of serotonergic medications from 10 case reports published between 2002 and 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important for psychiatrists to recognize the syndrome of RCVS in patients presenting with headache and ischemia due to the possibility of this syndrome being a rare but iatrogenic complication of a common psychiatric medication class. Additionally, identification of safe alternative treatments for patients with psychiatric illness who would otherwise be candidates for serotonergic medications is an important consideration for individuals affected by this disorder.

Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome: Symptoms, Incidence, and Resource Utilization in a Population-Based US Cohort

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence of hospitalization for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), we identified RCVS-related hospital admissions across 11 US states in 2016.

METHODS

We tested the validity of ICD-10 code I67.841 in 79 patients with hospital admissions for RCVS or other cerebrovascular diseases at 1 academic and 1 community hospital. After determining that this code had a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-100%) and a specificity of 90% (95% CI, 79%-96%), we applied it to administrative data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project on all hospital admissions across 11 states. Age- and sex-standardized RCVS incidence was calculated using census data. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze associated diagnoses.

RESULTS

Across 5,067,250 hospital admissions in our administrative data, we identified 222 patients with a discharge diagnosis of RCVS in 2016. The estimated annual age- and sex-standardized incidence of RCVS hospitalization was 2.7 (95% CI, 2.4-3.1) cases per million adults. Many patients had concomitant neurologic diagnoses, including subarachnoid hemorrhage (37%), ischemic stroke (16%), and intracerebral hemorrhage (10%). In the 90 days before the index admission, 97 patients had an emergency department (ED) visit and 34 patients a hospital admission, most commonly for neurologic, psychiatric, and pregnancy-related diagnoses. Following discharge from the RCVS hospital admission, 58 patients had an ED visit and 31 had a hospital admission, most commonly for neurologic diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Using population-wide data, we estimated the age- and sex-standardized incidence of hospitalization for RCVS in US adults as approximately 3 per million per year.

Early Risk of Readmission Following Hospitalization for Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

For evaluation of 90-day readmissions after an inpatient admission for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), hospitalizations due to RCVS were identified from the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2017.

METHODS

The primary outcome of interest was nonelective readmission within 90 days of index hospitalization discharge. Survival analysis was performed, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the factors associated with readmission.

RESULTS

Among the 1,157 hospitalizations due to RCVS during the study period (mean ± SD age 48.6 ± 16.1 years, women 76.4%), 164 (14.2%) patients had nonelective readmission within 90 days of discharge. The most common reasons for readmissions included acute cerebrovascular events (18.9%), continued or recurrent symptoms of RCVS (13.4%), infections (11.6%), and headache (9.8%). Diabetes, history of tobacco use, opioid use, and longer length of index hospitalization were independent predictors of 90-day readmission. For readmissions, the mean (SD) length of stay was 5.2 (6.1) days, and the mean (SD) cost per hospitalization was $14,214 ($15,140). There was no in-hospital mortality; however, 37.2% of patients were not discharged to home.

CONCLUSION

Nearly 14% of patients with RCVS are readmitted within 90 days of discharge, and a significant proportion of these readmissions are due to the ongoing/recurrent symptoms or neurologic sequelae of RCVS. Given that these patients are at a risk of early recurrence/worsening of their symptoms, an early postdischarge follow-up plan may need to be integrated into their care.

Post-reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome headache

Background

Chronic headache may persist after the remission of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) in some patients. We aimed to investigate the prevalence, characteristics, risk factors, and the impact of post-RCVS headache.

Methods

We prospectively recruited patients with RCVS and collected their baseline demographics, including psychological distress measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale. We evaluated whether the patients developed post-RCVS headache 3 months after RCVS onset. The manifestations of post-RCVS headache and headache-related disability measured by Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores were recorded.

Results

From 2017 to 2019, 134 patients with RCVS were recruited, of whom, 123 finished follow-up interviews (response rate 91.8%). Sixty (48.8%) patients had post-RCVS headache. Migrainous features were common in post-RCVS headache. Post-RCVS headache caused moderate-to-severe headache-related disability (MIDAS score > 10) in seven (11.7%) patients. Higher anxiety level (odds ratio 1.21, p = 0.009) and a history of migraine (odds ratio 2.59, p = 0.049) are associated with post-RCVS headache. Survival analysis estimated that 50% post-RCVS headache would recover in 389 days (95% confidence interval: 198.5–579) after disease onset.

Conclusions

Post-RCVS headache is common, affecting half of patients and being disabling in one-tenth. Higher anxiety level and migraine history are risk factors. Half of the patients with post-RCVS headache would recover in about a year.

Stroke in pregnancy

Stroke in pregnancy is rare and has a wide range of etiologies and implications on stroke management that differ from nonpregnant individuals. The highest risk of stroke is during the third trimester and puerperium period, where hypertensive disorders of pregnancy occur; however, stroke can occur at any point during pregnancy. In this chapter, we will provide an overview of the epidemiology of stroke in pregnancy and then review the specific etiologies of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke as they relate to pregnant women. Finally, we discuss the process of acute stroke evaluation in pregnancy and the management of women after stroke with regard to long-term risk factors, medications, and implications in future pregnancies. Throughout the chapter, we highlight relevant guidelines from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association and key literature on stroke in pregnancy.

Long-Term Outcomes After Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome

Background and Purpose—

We aimed to further investigate the long-term outcomes after reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS).

Methods—

A longitudinal follow-up study was conducted in 173 RCVS patients.

Results—

Of the 172 patients who completed a mean follow-up of 9.2±3.3 years, 10 had a recurrent RCVS that was benign in all. Independent predictors of relapse were having a history of migraine and having exercise as a trigger for thunderclap headache during initial RCVS. After new delivery, the rate of postpartum RCVS was 9%.

Conclusions—

Overall, long-term outcome after RCVS is excellent.

[Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome a rare cause of post-partum headache: an anesthetic overview]

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome is a cerebrovascular disorder leading to multifocal arterial constriction and dilation. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome is possibly caused by transient deregulation of cerebral vascular tone. We report a rare case of a patient with chief complain of postpartum headache, was later diagnosed as a case of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. A young full term primigravida with good uterine contraction admitted to labour room. Later she complained of leaking per vagina and on examination meconium stained liquor was noted. Caesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia was done and intra-operative period was uneventful. Both mother and baby were normal and shifted to postoperative ward and nursery respectively. In postoperative ward, mother complained of severe headache after one hour and later developed seizure. Midazolam was given intravenously and was intubated and transferred to critical care unit for further investigation and management. Non contrast computerized tomography scan of brain showed right occipital intracerebral as well as subarachnoid bleed. CT angiography showed right vertebral artery narrowing without any other vascular malformation. Patient was managed in critical care unit for 2 days and then extubated and shifted to high dependency ward after a day observation and discharged 3 days later after a full uneventful recovery.

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome a rare cause of post-partum headache: an anesthetic overview

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome is a cerebrovascular disorder leading to multifocal arterial constriction and dilation. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome is possibly caused by transient deregulation of cerebral vascular tone. We report a rare case of a patient with chief complain of postpartum headache, was later diagnosed as a case of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. A young full term primigravida with good uterine contraction admitted to labour room. Later she complained of leaking per vagina and on examination meconium stained liquor was noted. Caesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia was done and intra-operative period was uneventful. Both mother and baby were normal and shifted to postoperative ward and nursery respectively. In postoperative ward, mother complained of severe headache after 1 h and later developed seizure. Midazolam was given intravenously and was intubated and transferred to critical care unit for further investigation and management. Non contrast computerised tomography scan of brain showed right occipital intracerebral as well as subarachnoid bleed. CT angiography showed right vertebral artery narrowing without any other vascular malformation. Patient was managed in critical care unit for 2 days and then extubated and shifted to high dependency ward after a day observation and discharged 3 days later after a full uneventful recovery.

Primary angiitis of the CNS and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome

Objectives

To further improve the distinction between primary angiitis of the CNS (PACNS) and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS).

Methods

We compared 2 large French cohorts of patients with PACNS (n = 110, retrospectively and prospectively enrolled) and RCVS (n = 173, prospectively enrolled).

Results

Patients with RCVS were predominantly female (p < 0.0001), with migraines (p < 0.0001), and were more often exposed to vasoactive substances (p < 0.0001) or postpartum (p = 0.002) than patients with PACNS. Headache, especially thunderclap headache, was more frequent in RCVS (both p < 0.0001). Thunderclap headache was absent in only 6% of patients with RCVS and was mainly recurrent (87%) and provoked (77%) mostly by sexual intercourse, exertion, or emotion. All other neurologic symptoms (motor deficit, seizure, cognitive disorder, or vigilance impairment, all p < 0.0001) were more frequent in PACNS. At admission, brain CT or MRI was abnormal in all patients with PACNS and in 31% of patients with RCVS (p < 0.0001). Acute ischemic stroke was more frequent in PACNS than in RCVS (p < 0.0001). Although intracerebral hemorrhage was more frequent in PACNS (p = 0.006), subarachnoid hemorrhage and vasogenic edema predominated in RCVS (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively). Multiple small deep infarcts, extensive deep white matter lesions, tumor-like lesions, or multiple gadolinium-enhanced lesions were observed only in PACNS, whereas cervical artery dissection was found only in RCVS.

Conclusions

Our study confirms that careful analysis of clinical context, headache features, and patterns of brain lesions can distinguish PACNS and RCVS within the first few days of admission in most cases. However, diagnosis remains challenging in a few cases.

Severe Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome with Large Posterior Cerebral Infarction

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome is characterized by thunderclap headache and multifocal cerebral vasoconstriction. Cerebral vasoconstriction is reversible, and most cases have good prognosis. However, clinical outcome is possibly severe when it is complicated by stroke, yet detailed reports on such a case are few. We experienced a case of severe reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in a 32-year-old woman with medical history of preeclampsia 3years prior. She presented with sudden sharp headache followed by altered mental status and vasoconstriction of the bilateral posterior cerebral arteries. She was treated with intravenous and oral calcium channel blockers, edaravone, and glycerol. However, the cerebral infarction in the posterior circulation subsequently remained, and her impaired consciousness did not recover. Furthermore, although imaging findings of vasoconstriction showed improvement a day after the occurrence of symptom, the same vessels showed poor visualization 7 weeks later, which indicated the recurrence of vasoconstriction, without additional symptom due to the fixed infarction. Although most cases of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome show good prognosis, neurologists must monitor the possibility of worse clinical course and permanent neurological deficit when associated with stroke, such as cerebral infarction. Strict management and treatment are needed in these cases.

Central nervous system vasculitis in adults: An update

Primary central nervous system vasculitis (PCNSV) is a challenging diagnosis due to broad clinical manifestations and variable specificity and sensitivity of laboratory and imaging diagnostic tools. Differential diagnosis includes reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), secondary vasculitis of the CNS and other noninflammatory vasculopathies. Brain biopsy is essential for definitive diagnosis and to exclude mimickers. Recent data show that data large-vessel PCNSV present worse prognosis when compared to small-vessel PCNSV. Herein we review diagnosis and management of PCNSV, secondary vasculitis of CNS and RCVS.

Fulminant Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is increasingly being recognized as a diagnosis in patients presenting with thunderclap headaches. In the vast majority of the cases, the syndrome follows a benign course and patients recover completely without any significant therapeutic intervention. In the rarest of cases, RCVS follows a monophasic course with rapid worsening, severe neurological deficits, and poor outcomes. We present the case of a 25-year-old female who presented with headaches which were worsening over 1 week. She was admitted to the hospital and rapidly worsened to develop severe neurological deficits over the next day. Initial computed tomography scan showed areas of hemorrhage and multiple ischemic strokes. Computed tomography angiogram and a conventional cerebral angiogram both revealed multifocal vasoconstriction, highly suggestive of RCVS. Despite aggressive medical and surgical management, the patient continued to worsen and eventually died. Autopsy findings did not show evidence of vasculopathy or any other underlying disorder, further supporting the diagnosis of RCVS. The RCVS is usually a benign self-remitting condition which commonly affects young females and presents with an insidious onset of headaches. Rarely, it can have a fulminant course with devastating outcomes. This case illustrates an exceptionally uncommon clinical course of RCVS and the challenges in its treatment.

Glucocorticoid-associated worsening in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Factors predicting poor outcome in patients with the reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) have not been identified.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical, brain imaging, and angiography data in 162 patients with RCVS. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis were performed to identify predictors of persistent (nontransient) clinical worsening, radiologic worsening, early angiographic progression, and poor discharge outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 4-6).

RESULTS

The mean age was 44 ± 13 years; 78% of patients were women. Persistent clinical worsening occurred in 14% at 6.6 ± 4.1 days after symptom onset, radiologic worsening in 27% (mainly new infarcts), and angiographic progression in 15%. Clinical worsening correlated with angiographic progression and new nonhemorrhagic lesions. Age and sex did not independently predict any type of worsening. Infarction on baseline imaging predicted poor outcome. Prior serotonergic antidepressant use predicted clinical and angiographic worsening but not poor outcome. Intra-arterial vasodilator therapy independently predicted clinical worsening and poor discharge outcome but was offered to more severe cases. Glucocorticoid treatment proved to be an independent predictor of clinical, imaging, and angiographic worsening and poor outcome. Of the 23 patients with clinical worsening, 17 received glucocorticoids (15 within the preceding 2 days). There were no significant differences in baseline brain lesions and angiographic abnormalities between glucocorticoid-treated and untreated patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with RCVS at risk for worsening can be identified on basis of baseline features. Iatrogenic factors such as glucocorticoid exposure may contribute to worsening.

Gender and hormonal influences in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome

Introduction

The reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes, including postpartum angiopathy, have been characterized over the last decade. Women are predominantly affected. Some studies suggest that postpartum angiopathy carries a worse prognosis.

Patients and methods

We compared the clinical, neuroimaging, and angiographic features of 36 men, 110 non-pregnant women and 16 postpartum women included in our single-center cohort of patients with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes encountered from 1998 to 2016.

Results

As compared to men, non-pregnant women were older (48 ± 11 vs. 34 ± 13 years, p < 0.001), had more underlying migraine (49% vs. 19%, p = 0.002), depression (53% vs. 14%, p < 0.001) and serotonergic antidepressant use (45% vs. 11%, p < 0.001), developed more clinical worsening (18% vs. 3%, p = 0.022), more infarcts (39% vs. 20%, p = 0.031) and worse angiographic severity scores (23 ± 14 vs. 10.9 ± 10.3, p < 0.001), but had similar discharge outcomes (modified Rankin scale scores 0-3, 90% vs. 91%, p = 0.768). Sexual activity was an important trigger in men (22% vs. 4%, p = 0.002). As compared to non-pregnant women, postpartum angiopathy patients were younger (33 ± 6 years, p < 0.001) and had less vasoconstrictive drug exposure (25% vs. 67%, p = 0.002) but showed similar clinical, radiological and angiographic findings and similar discharge outcomes (modified Rankin scale scores 0-3 in 94%, p = 0.633). There were no significant differences between pre- and post-menopausal women, or those with and without hysterectomy.

Discussion/Conclusion

The observed gender differences in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes may result from hormonal or non-hormonal factors. Hormonal imbalances may trigger reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes. Given the absence of significant differences in the female subgroups, hormonal factors do not appear to significantly affect the course or outcome of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes.