1
|
Naegel S. [Medication overuse headache]. FORTSCHRITTE DER NEUROLOGIE-PSYCHIATRIE 2024; 92:298-303. [PMID: 39025057 DOI: 10.1055/a-2332-5973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a globally prevalent and debilitating condition that results from excessive use of acute therapies and can significantly affect quality of life, despite the fact that simple information about the causes and consequences of the condition can help prevent or stop MOH. In recent years, many new insights have been gained into headaches caused by medication overuse. In addition, the diagnostic criteria and guideline recommendations have changed considerably. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the clinic, definition/classification, epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, controversies, prevention, and treatment of MOH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Naegel
- Neurologie, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus Rüttenscheid, Essen, Germany
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shewale AR, Brandenburg JA, Burslem K, Lipton RB, Doshi JA. Health care resource utilization and costs associated with diagnosed medication overuse headache and potential acute medication overuse in individuals with migraine. Cephalalgia 2024; 44:3331024241235139. [PMID: 38410849 DOI: 10.1177/03331024241235139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Estimate health care resource utilization and costs associated with medication overuse headache and potential acute medication overuse. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted with Clinformatics Data Mart data (1 January 2019-31 December 2019) that included continuously enrolled commercially insured adults with migraine (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-10-CM] code G43.xxx). Medication overuse headache was defined as ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient claims with an ICD-10-CM code G44.41/40 (drug-induced headache). Potential acute medication overuse was defined as possessing sufficient medication for >10 mean treatment days/month for ergots, triptans, opioids, or combination analgesics or >15 mean cumulative days/month for simple prescription analgesics (e.g., acetaminophen, aspirin, other non-opioid analgesics) for >6 consecutive months. All-cause and migraine-related health care resource utilization and costs were compared after adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS Among 90,017 individuals with migraine, the frequency of medication overuse headache/potential acute medication overuse was 12.6% (diagnosed medication overuse headache: 0.6%; potential acute medication overuse: 12.1%). Adjusted all-cause total costs ($31,235 vs $21,486; difference: $9,749 [P < 0.001]) and adjusted migraine-related total costs ($9,770 vs $6,207; difference: $3,563 [P < 0.001]) were higher in the medication overuse headache/potential acute medication overuse group versus those without medication overuse headache/potential acute medication overuse. CONCLUSIONS Individuals with diagnosed medication overuse headache/potential acute medication overuse had higher all-cause and migraine-related health care resource utilization and costs versus individuals without medication overuse headache/potential acute medication overuse, suggesting that improved migraine management is needed to reduce associated costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jalpa A Doshi
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McMullen S, Graves E, Ekwaru P, Pham T, Mayer M, Ladouceur MP, Hubert M, Bougie J, Amoozegar F. Burden of Episodic Migraine, Chronic Migraine, and Medication Overuse Headache in Alberta. Can J Neurol Sci 2023:1-11. [PMID: 37795668 DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2023.289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe demographic and clinical characteristics, healthcare resource use, costs, and treatment patterns in three migraine cohorts. METHODS This retrospective observational study using administrative data examined patients with episodic migraine (EM), chronic migraine (CM) (without medication overuse headache [MOH]), and medication overuse headache in Alberta, Canada. Migraine patients were identified between 2012 and 2018 based on ≥ 1 diagnostic codes or triptan prescription. Patients with CM were defined using parameter estimates of a logistic regression model, and MOH was defined as patients with an average of ≥ 15 supply days covered of acute medications. EM was defined as patients without CM or MOH. Study outcomes were summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Patients with EM (n = 144,574), CM (n = 27,283), and MOH (n = 11,485) were included. Higher rates of healthcare use and costs were observed for CM (mean [SD] all-cause cost: ($12,693 [40,664]) and MOH ($16,611.5 [$38,748]) versus episodic migraine ($4,251 [$40,637]). Across all cohorts, opioids were the most dispensed acute medication (range across cohorts: 31.7%-89.8%), while antidepressants and anticonvulsants were the most dispensed preventive medication. Preventative medication classes were used by a minority of patients in each cohort, except anticonvulsants, where 50% of medication overuse patients had a dispensation. CONCLUSIONS Patients with CM and MOH have a greater burden of illness compared to patients with EM. The overutilization of acute medication, particularly opioids, and the underutilization of preventive medications highlight an unmet need to more effectively manage migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erin Graves
- Medlior Health Outcomes Research Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Paul Ekwaru
- Medlior Health Outcomes Research Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Tram Pham
- Medlior Health Outcomes Research Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Michelle Mayer
- Medlior Health Outcomes Research Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Farnaz Amoozegar
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ljubisavljevic S, Ljubisavljevic M, Damjanovic R, Kalinic S. A Descriptive Review of Medication-Overuse Headache: From Pathophysiology to the Comorbidities. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1408. [PMID: 37891777 PMCID: PMC10605322 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13101408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is an important problem worldwide, with different areas of controversy regarding its entity. This article reviews the risk factors, comorbidities, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, effective management, and prognosis of MOH by summarizing and integrating the results and findings from previously performed more than 15,000 studies (from 2010 to 2023) available from the scientific database of the University Medical Library in the University Clinical Center of Niš, which aimed to investigate and define the complexity of this type of headache. RECENT FINDING It has been proposed that all acute migraine medications can lead to MOH, with differences in the propensity of different agents to cause the problem. Early data suggests that triptans and other painkillers used for the acute treatment of migraine may be an exception. Recent studies show that practitioners and the general public are still largely unaware of the problem of medication overuse and its damaging effects. SUMMARY Although it is likely that MOH does occur, restricting the number of acute medications is necessary to prevent it. It is also possible that increasing amounts of acute medications are simply a reflection of poorly controlled headaches rather than a cause. Further research needs to be developed to identify more precise mechanisms for effective MOH management and its evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srdjan Ljubisavljevic
- Department for Neurology, University Clinical Centre of Nis, 18000 Nis, Serbia; (M.L.); (R.D.); (S.K.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cuneo A, Yang R, Zhou H, Wang K, Goh S, Wang Y, Raiti J, Krashin D, Murinova N. The Utility of a Novel, Combined Biofeedback-Virtual Reality Device as Add-on Treatment for Chronic Migraine: A Randomized Pilot Study. Clin J Pain 2023; 39:286-296. [PMID: 37026763 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine if the frequent use of a combined biofeedback-virtual reality device improves headache-related outcomes in chronic migraine. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this randomized, controlled pilot study, 50 adults with chronic migraine were randomized to the experimental group (frequent use of a heart rate variability biofeedback-virtual reality device plus standard medical care; n=25) or wait-list control group (standard medical care alone; n=25). The primary outcome was a reduction in mean monthly headache days between groups at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included mean change in acute analgesic use frequency, depression, migraine-related disability, stress, insomnia, and catastrophizing between groups at 12 weeks. Tertiary outcomes included change in heart rate variability and device-related user experience measures. RESULTS A statistically significant reduction in mean monthly headache days between groups was not demonstrated at 12 weeks. However, statistically significant decreases in the mean frequency of total acute analgesic use per month (65% decrease in the experimental group versus 35% decrease in the control group, P <0.01) and depression score (35% decrease in the experimental group versus 0.5% increase in the control group; P <0.05) were shown at 12 weeks. At study completion, more than 50% of participants reported device satisfaction on a 5-level Likert scale. DISCUSSION Frequent use of a portable biofeedback-virtual reality device was associated with decreases in the frequency of acute analgesic use and in depression in individuals with chronic migraine. This platform holds promise as an add-on treatment for chronic migraine, especially for individuals aiming to decrease acute analgesic use or interested in nonmedication approaches.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a secondary headache disorder attributed to overuse of acute headache medications by a person with an underlying headache disorder, usually migraine or tension-type headache. MOH is common among individuals with 15 or more headache days per month. Although MOH is associated with substantial disability and reductions in quality of life, this condition is often under-recognized. As MOH is both preventable and treatable, it warrants greater attention and awareness. The diagnosis of MOH is based on the history and an unremarkable neurological examination, and is made according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders third edition (ICHD-3). Pathophysiological mechanisms of MOH include altered descending pain modulation, central sensitization and biobehavioural factors. Treatment of MOH includes the use of headache preventive therapies, but essential to success is eliminating the cause, by reducing the frequency of use of acute headache medication, and perhaps withdrawing the overused medication altogether. Appropriate treatment is usually highly effective, leading to reduced headache burden and acute medication consumption.
Collapse
|
7
|
Diener HC, Rizzoli P. Chronic migraine and medication overuse. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2023; 198:187-200. [PMID: 38043961 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-823356-6.00008-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
Though clearly described as far back as the 17th century, chronic migraine has defied precise categorization and has continued to develop as an important diagnostic concept with significant societal impact. Worldwide prevalence is estimated to be between 1% and 3%, and these patients form a dynamic group cycling between chronic and episodic migraine. Theories of pathogenesis are developing supported by recent imaging and other findings. Of the many determinants of progression to chronic migraine, overuse of acute abortive headache medications may be one of the most important modifiable factors. Treatment strategies, in addition to educational measures, have included various preventive migraine medications such as topiramate, valproate, and onabotulinumtoxinA. CGRP monoclonal antibodies are efficacious for the management of chronic migraine both with and without medication overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Christoph Diener
- Department of Neuroepidemiology, Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IMIBE), Medical Faculty of the University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Paul Rizzoli
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; John R Graham Headache Center, Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park HK, Cho SJ. Comprehensive approach for the treatment of medication-overuse headache. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 2021. [DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2021.64.12.843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders as a headache in patients with a pre-existing primary headache disorder that occurs on 15 or more days per month for more than 3 months. It is caused by overuse of medication for acute or symptomatic headache treatment. Regular and frequent use of acute or symptomatic medications can worsen headaches and lead to chronic headache or MOH. MOH is a burdensome medical condition that is difficult to treat, and the frequent recurrence of headaches may result in disability in individuals and impair socioeconomic outcomes.Current Concepts: Awareness of MOH and the education of patients, the general population, and healthcare providers are important for the first step of treatment. Scientific research regarding the treatment of MOH has been published in the past few years.Discussion and Conclusion: Physicians should educate and counsel patients to stop or at least reduce the intake of acute or symptomatic medications that can be discontinued abruptly or tapered slowly. During the period after the discontinuation of the overused medications, some withdrawal symptoms including headache might be manageable with bridging therapy. Evidence-based preventive therapies including anticonvulsants (topiramate and divalproex sodium), botulinum toxin A, and medications acting by antagonism of the calcitonin generelated peptide pathway might be helpful in patients with MOH for both avoiding the overused medication and preventing the relapse of overuse. A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach may improve the outcomes of patients with MOH.
Collapse
|
9
|
Park HK, Chu MK, Oh SY, Moon HS, Song TJ, Lee MJ, Kang JJ, Hong Y, Cho SJ. Interim analysis of the Registry for Load and Management of Medication Overuse Headache (RELEASE): A multicenter, comprehensive medication overuse headache registry. Cephalalgia 2021; 42:455-465. [PMID: 34786971 DOI: 10.1177/03331024211057184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Characteristics, disabilities, and optimal management of medication overuse headache remain uncertain. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical characteristics of patients with medication overuse headache enrolled in a medication overuse headache registry in Korea. METHODS The Registry for Load and Management of MEdicAtion OveruSE Headache (RELEASE), a cross-sectional prospective observational study including seven referral headache centers in Korea, started enrolling adult patients with medication overuse headache in April 2020. Data included information on headache characteristics, burden on daily function, depression, anxiety, history of acute and preventive medications, and treatment strategies. RESULTS A total of 229 patients (85.6% females; mean age, 45.5 ± 13.5 years) were enrolled by June 2021. The average durations of chronic headaches and medication overuse were 6.5 and 4.3 years, respectively. In the past month before enrollment, patients had headaches for 25 days and severe headaches for 12 days, and used acute medications for 20 days. Patients were disabled in 66.8 days in the past 3 months and had moderate/severe depression and anxiety in 56% and 35%, respectively. The proportion of patients on preventive treatments increased from 38% to 93% during the study period. CONCLUSIONS RELEASE study reflects the current management status and opportunities to improve the quality of care in patients with medication overuse headache.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Kyun Park
- Department of Neurology, 119750Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Min Kyung Chu
- Department of Neurology, 54678Severance Hospital, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Oh
- Department of Neurology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University School of Medicine, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Heui-Soo Moon
- Department of Neurology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Jin Song
- Department of Neurology, Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Ju Kang
- Department of Neurology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University School of Medicine, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Yooha Hong
- Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Soo-Jin Cho
- Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
D’Amico D, Grazzi L, Guastafierro E, Sansone E, Leonardi M, Raggi A. Withdrawal failure in patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse headache. Acta Neurol Scand 2021; 144:408-417. [PMID: 34036572 PMCID: PMC8453823 DOI: 10.1111/ane.13475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Objectives The management of chronic migraine (CM) with Medication Overuse Headache (MOH) consists of withdrawal therapy, education on medications’ use and prescription of prophylaxis. Little attention has been given to patients who fail in achieving a successful short‐term outcome after withdrawal: we aim to describe predictors of failure. Methods Patients with CM and MOH were enrolled at the Neurological Institute C. Besta of Milano, and included if they completed the three months follow‐up. Withdrawal failure was defined as the situation in which patients either did not revert from chronic to episodic migraine (EM), were still overusing acute medications, or both did not revert to EM and kept overusing acute medications. Predictors of failure were addressed with a logistic regression, and for all variables, the longitudinal course in the two groups was described. Results In 39, out of 137 patients, withdrawal was unsuccessful: the predictors included day‐hospital‐based withdrawal (OR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.06–5.29), emergency room (ER) access before withdrawal (OR: 2.81; 95% CI: 1.13–6.94) and baseline headache frequency >69 days/three months (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 1.32–6.65). Patients who failed withdrawal did not improve on medications intake, use of prophylactic and non‐pharmacological treatments, symptoms of anxiety and depression. Conclusions Patients who were treated in day‐hospital, those who recently attended ER for headache, and those with more than 69 headache/3 months, as well as to those with relevant symptoms of anxiety and depression who did not improve should be closely monitored to reduce likelihood of non‐improvement after structured withdrawal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico D’Amico
- Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta Dipartimento Neuroalgologia Centro Cefalee Milano Italy
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta Dipartimento Neuroalgologia Centro Cefalee Milano Italy
| | - Erika Guastafierro
- Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta UO Neurologia Salute Pubblica e Disabilità Milano Italy
| | - Emanuela Sansone
- Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta UO Neurologia Salute Pubblica e Disabilità Milano Italy
| | - Matilde Leonardi
- Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta UO Neurologia Salute Pubblica e Disabilità Milano Italy
| | - Alberto Raggi
- Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta UO Neurologia Salute Pubblica e Disabilità Milano Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Carlsen LN, Rouw C, Westergaard ML, Nielsen M, Munksgaard SB, Bendtsen L, Jensen RH. Treatment of medication overuse headache: Effect and predictors after 1 year-A randomized controlled trial. Headache 2021; 61:1112-1122. [PMID: 34325483 DOI: 10.1111/head.14177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combined withdrawal and early preventive medication was the most effective treatment for medication overuse headache (MOH) within the first 6 months in a previous study, but results from a longer follow-up period are lacking. OBJECTIVE (1) To measure the efficacy at 1 year of three different treatment approaches to MOH; (2) to compare withdrawal and early preventives (W+P), preventives with potential withdrawal therapy after 6 months (P+pW), and withdrawal with delayed potential preventives (W+pP); and (3) to identify predictors of chronic headache after 1 year. METHODS Patients with MOH and migraine and/or tension-type headache were randomly assigned to one of the three outpatient treatments. Headache calendar and questionnaires were filled out. Primary outcome was a reduction in headache days/month after 1 year. RESULTS Of 120 patients, 96 completed 1-year follow-up, and all were included in our analyses. Overall headache days/month were reduced from 24.6 (23.4-25.8) to 15.0 (13.0-17.0) (p < 0.0001), and only 11/96 patients (11%) relapsed. Reduction in monthly headache days was 10.3 days (95% CI: 6.7-13.9) in the W+P group, 10.8 days (95% CI: 7.6-14) in the P+pW group, and 7.9 days (95% CI: 5.1-10.7) in the W+pP group. No significant differences in treatment effect were seen between the three groups (p = 0.377). After 1 year, 39/96 (41%) had chronic headache. Predictors of chronic headache after 1 year were higher headache frequency (aOR 1.19; 1.09-1.31), more days with acute medication (aOR 1.11; 1.03-1.19), higher pain intensity (aOR 1.04; 1.01-1.08), and depression (aOR 4.7; 1.38-18.95), whereas higher self-rated health (aOR 0.61; 0.36-0.97) and high caffeine consumption (aOR 0.40; 0.16-0.96) were predictors of a lower risk of chronic headache. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS All treatment strategies proved effective in treating MOH with a low relapse rate. The W+P strategy leads to the fastest effect, confirming earlier treatment recommendations. Identification of predictors for chronic headache may help identify more complex patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise N Carlsen
- Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, Glostrup, 2600, Denmark
| | - Carolien Rouw
- Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, Glostrup, 2600, Denmark
| | - Maria L Westergaard
- Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, Glostrup, 2600, Denmark
| | - Mia Nielsen
- Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, Glostrup, 2600, Denmark
| | - Signe B Munksgaard
- Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, Glostrup, 2600, Denmark
| | - Lars Bendtsen
- Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, Glostrup, 2600, Denmark
| | - Rigmor H Jensen
- Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, Glostrup, 2600, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Background Medication overuse headache (MOH) is one of the highly disabling headache disorder and affects about 1% of the population of the world. It is associated with the development of headache for 15 days or more, with consumption of acute symptomatic medications for 10-15 days (depending on the class of drug, like, simple analgesics, triptans, and opioids) in a month, used for relief of headache for three or more months, in a known patient of primary headache disorder. Objective The aim of this study was to review the topic of MOH and present the details of this disorder with an emphasis on recent updates in the field of pathophysiology and treatment. Material and Methods Literature search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane database with appropriate keywords and relevant full-text articles were reviewed for writing this article. Results Over the years, the concept of MOH has evolved, although the exact pathophysiology is still being explored. In a susceptible individual interplay of genetics, change in pain pathways, changes in areas of the brain associated with the perception of pain, and changes in the neurotransmitters have been implicated. It has to be differentiated from other secondary chronic daily headache disorders, by a careful history, targeted examination, details of intake of medications. Treatment predominantly involves patient education, removal of the offending agent, and initiation of prophylactic medications for primary headache disorder in the outpatient or inpatient services. Conclusions MOH is a secondary headache disorder, which should be considered in any chronic headache patient. There are various pathophysiological mechanisms attributed to its development. Management includes educating the patients about the disorder, detoxification, and prophylactic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Mathew
- Department of Neurology, St. Johns Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
The Evolution of Medication Overuse Headache: History, Pathophysiology and Clinical Update. CNS Drugs 2021; 35:545-565. [PMID: 34002347 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-021-00818-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Medication overuse headache (MOH), the development or worsening of chronic headache resulting from frequent and excessive intake of medications used for acute treatment of headache, is a common secondary headache disorder and is associated with significant personal and societal burdens. The plausible physiologic mechanism is that chronic exposure to acute care migraine treatment leads to suppression of endogenous antinociceptive systems, consequently facilitating the trigeminal nociceptive process via up-regulation of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) system. Recognizing and preventing its development is an integral aspect of migraine management, as medication overuse is a modifiable risk factor in the progression from episodic to chronic migraine. Over the years, MOH has been difficult to treat and has generated much controversy. Ongoing debates exist over the diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies, particularly regarding the roles of formal detoxification and preventive treatment. The arrival of the anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies has also challenged our views of MOH and its treatment. This review outlines the evolution of MOH diagnostic criteria, presents the current understanding of MOH pathogenesis and discusses the debates over its development and treatment. Data on the efficacy of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in the setting of medication overuse is also presented. These results indicate that patients with medication overuse, who are treated with these new medications, may not need to be detoxified in order to treat MOH. In light of these developments, it is likely that in the future MOH will be more readily diagnosed and treatment will result in better outcomes.
Collapse
|
14
|
Economic burden of medication-overuse headache in Iran: direct and indirect costs. Neurol Sci 2020; 42:1869-1877. [PMID: 32948933 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04716-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Medication-overuse headache (MOH) as a secondary chronic headache imposes a considerable burden on both individuals and societies. Nevertheless, little is known about the burden of MOH in Iran. Therefore, in the current study, we aimed to quantify the annual cost of MOH among Iranian patients. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, 84 patients were recruited. Demographic data, headache attack characteristics, related disability, and information about the economic burden of MOH were collected through face-to-face interview. Direct medical and nonmedical costs as well as indirect costs were included in our cost analysis. The prevalence-based approach was applied to estimate the economic burden of MOH. RESULTS We found that MOH patients in Iran spend averagely $1046 for medical services, $132 for nonmedical services, and $1432 due to lost productivity per year. The per-person annual cost of MOH was US$2610, and the total annual cost for Iran was $10,179,000,000, with direct and indirect cost accounting for 45% and 55%, respectively. CONCLUSION MOH leads to substantial healthcare costs and significant loss of productivity in Iran. Therefore, raising awareness in this area especially for policymakers can use in future health planning and lead to resource allocation in the field of disabling type of headache disorders such as MOH. Our findings also provide a different insight into the burden of MOH, which are likely closer to the actual costs in middle- and low-income countries, and also it could be a sample of such a study in western Asia.
Collapse
|
15
|
Carlsen LN, Munksgaard SB, Nielsen M, Engelstoft IMS, Westergaard ML, Bendtsen L, Jensen RH. Comparison of 3 Treatment Strategies for Medication Overuse Headache: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol 2020; 77:1069-1078. [PMID: 32453406 PMCID: PMC7251504 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Importance Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a disabling, globally prevalent disorder representing a well-known and debated clinical problem. Evidence for the most effective treatment strategy is needed. Objective To compare 3 treatment strategies for MOH. Design, Setting, and Participants This open-label, randomized clinical trial with 6 months of follow-up was conducted in the tertiary sector at the Danish Headache Center, Glostrup, from October 25, 2016, to June 28, 2019. Of 483 patients with MOH referred during the inclusion period, 195 met the criteria consisting of migraine and/or tension-type headache, 18 years or older, eligibility for outpatient treatment, no severe physical or psychiatric disorder, no other addiction, and not pregnant or breastfeeding. Of these, 75 refused participation and 120 were included. Data were analyzed from July 3 to September 6, 2019. Interventions Random assignment (1:1:1 allocation) to 1 of the 3 outpatient treatments consisting of (1) withdrawal plus preventive treatment, (2) preventive treatment without withdrawal, or (3) withdrawal with optional preventive treatment 2 months after withdrawal. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was change in headache days per month after 6 months. Predefined secondary outcomes were change in monthly migraine days, use of short-term medication, pain intensity, number of responders, patients with remission to episodic headache, and cured MOH. Results Of 120 patients, 102 (mean [SD] age, 43.9 [11.8] years; 81 women [79.4%]) completed the 6-month follow-up. Headache days per month were reduced by 12.3 (95% CI, 9.3-15.3) in the withdrawal plus preventive group, by 9.9 (95% CI, 7.2-12.6) in the preventive group, and by 8.5 (95% CI, 5.6-11.5) in the withdrawal group (P = .20). No difference was found in reduction of migraine days per month, use of short-term medication, or headache intensity. In the withdrawal plus preventive group, 23 of 31 patients (74.2%) reverted to episodic headache, compared with 21 of 35 (60.0%) in the preventive group and 15 of 36 (41.7%) in the withdrawal group (P = .03). Moreover, 30 of 31 patients (96.8%) in the withdrawal plus preventive group were cured of MOH, compared with 26 of 35 (74.3%) in the preventive group and 32 of 36 (88.9%) in the withdrawal group (P = .03). These findings corresponded to a 30% (relative risk, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6) increased chance of MOH cure in the withdrawal plus preventive group compared with the preventive group (P = .03). Conclusion and Relevance All 3 treatment strategies were effective, but based on these findings, withdrawal therapy combined with preventive medication from the start of withdrawal is recommended as treatment for MOH. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02993289.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Ninett Carlsen
- Currently a PhD student at the University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | | - Mia Nielsen
- Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | | | | - Lars Bendtsen
- Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Toom K, Braschinsky M, Obermann M, Katsarava Z. Secondary headache attributed to exposure to or overuse of a substance. Cephalalgia 2020; 41:443-452. [PMID: 32819151 DOI: 10.1177/0333102420942238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Secondary headaches attributed to exposure to or the overuse of a substance are classified under chapter eight in the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition. Three distinct sub-chapters consider: 1. Headache attributed to exposure to a substance, 2. Medication overuse headache, and 3. Headache attributed to substance withdrawal. Headache attributed to exposure to a substance refers to a headache with onset immediately or within hours after the exposure, while medication overuse headache is a headache occurring on 15 or more days per month that has developed as a consequence of regular usage of acute headache medication(s) for more than three consecutive months in a patient with a pre-existing primary headache disorder. The withdrawal of caffeine, oestrogen, and opioids is most often associated with the development of headache. DISCUSSION Despite the current headache classification, there is no certainty of a causal relationship between the use of any substance and the development of headache. Some substances are likely to provoke headache in patients that suffer from a primary headache disorder like migraine, tension-type headache or cluster headache, while others were described to cause headache even in people that generally do not get headaches. Toxic agents, such as carbon monoxide (CO) are difficult to investigate systematically, while other substances such as nitric oxide (NO) were specifically used to induce headache experimentally. If a patient with an underlying primary headache disorder develops a headache, in temporal relation to exposure to a substance, which is significantly worse than the usual headache it is considered secondary. This is even more the case if the headache phenotype is different from the usually experienced headache characteristics. Medication overuse headache is a well-described, distinct disease entity with only marginally understood pathophysiology and associated psychological factors. Managing medication overuse headache patients includes education, detoxification, prophylactic treatments and treating comorbidities, which is reflected in available guidelines. Viewing medication overuse headache as a separate entity helps clinicians and researchers better recognise, treat and study the disorder. CONCLUSION Identification of substances that may cause or trigger secondary headache is important in order to educate patients and health care professionals about potential effects of these substances and prevent unnecessary suffering, as well as deterioration in quality of life. Treatment in case of medication overuse and other chronic headache should be decisive and effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kati Toom
- Neurology Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.,Estonian Headache Society, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Mark Braschinsky
- Neurology Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.,Estonian Headache Society, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Mark Obermann
- Center for Neurology, Asklepios Hospitals Schildautal, Seesen, Germany.,Evangelical Hospital Unna, Unna, Germany
| | - Zara Katsarava
- Evangelical Hospital Unna, Unna, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,EVEX Medical Corporation, Tbilisi, Republic of Georgia.,IM Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pijpers JA, Ferrari MD, Terwindt GM. Reply: OnabotulinumtoxinA should be considered in medication overuse withdrawal in patients with chronic migraine. Brain 2020; 143:e6. [PMID: 31782777 PMCID: PMC7261126 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Judith A Pijpers
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michel D Ferrari
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gisela M Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Diener HC, Antonaci F, Braschinsky M, Evers S, Jensen R, Lainez M, Kristoffersen ES, Tassorelli C, Ryliskiene K, Petersen JA. European Academy of Neurology guideline on the management of medication‐overuse headache. Eur J Neurol 2020; 27:1102-1116. [DOI: 10.1111/ene.14268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H. C. Diener
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology Faculty of Medicine University Duisburg‐Essen Essen Germany
| | - F. Antonaci
- IRCCS C. Mondino Foundation Pavia Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences University of Pavia Pavia Italy
| | - M. Braschinsky
- Headache Clinic Neurology Clinic Tartu University Hospital Tartu Estonia
| | - S. Evers
- Faculty of Medicine University of Münster MünsterGermany
- Krankenhaus Lindenbrunn Coppenbrügge Germany
| | - R. Jensen
- Danish Headache Center Neurological Clinic Rigshospitalet‐Glostrup University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - M. Lainez
- Department of Neurology Hospital Clínico Universitario ValenciaSpain
- Department of Neurology Universidad Católica de Valencia Valencia Spain
| | - E. S. Kristoffersen
- Department of Neurology Akershus University Hospital OsloNorway
- Department of General Practice University of Oslo Oslo Norway
| | - C. Tassorelli
- IRCCS C. Mondino Foundation Pavia Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences University of Pavia Pavia Italy
| | - K. Ryliskiene
- Department of Neurology Institute of Clinical Medicine Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
| | - J. A. Petersen
- Department Of Neurology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vandenbussche N, Paemeleire K, Katsarava Z. The Many Faces of Medication-Overuse Headache in Clinical Practice. Headache 2020; 60:1021-1036. [PMID: 32232847 DOI: 10.1111/head.13785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The management of medication-overuse headache (MOH) is multifaceted and headache experts have different views on the optimal strategy to tackle this type of secondary headache. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the literature on the management of MOH, and to highlight important considerations in the clinical evaluation of the MOH patient. Managing MOH in clinical practice starts by evaluating the headache patient with medication overuse, determining the overused drug(s), assessing the impact of headaches on the patient and assessing comorbid conditions and disorders. Withdrawal of the overused medication is the cornerstone of treatment. An inpatient or outpatient setting is chosen based on the clinical profile of the patient. There is evidence for abrupt withdrawal combined with headache preventive treatment. Bridging therapy to bring relief to withdrawal headaches and/or symptoms should be offered. Education and motivational work through multidisciplinary assessment show benefits in sustaining withdrawal and preventing relapse. Although the reversal of chronic headache after cessation of overused acute medication has been noticed worldwide, different aspects of the management of MOH, such as complete or gradual withdrawal, or preventive treatment with or without withdrawal are still debated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Koen Paemeleire
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Zaza Katsarava
- Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Evangelical Hospital Unna, Unna, Germany.,EVEX Medical Corporation, Tbilisi, GA, USA.,Sechenov University Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Raggi A, Leonardi M, Sansone E, Curone M, Grazzi L, D'Amico D. The cost and the value of treatment of medication overuse headache in Italy: a longitudinal study based on patient‐derived data. Eur J Neurol 2019; 27:62-e1. [DOI: 10.1111/ene.14034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A. Raggi
- Neurology Public Health and Disability Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta MilanoItaly
| | - M. Leonardi
- Neurology Public Health and Disability Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta MilanoItaly
| | - E. Sansone
- Neurology Public Health and Disability Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta MilanoItaly
| | - M. Curone
- Headache Centre Casa di Cura Igea MilanoItaly
| | - L. Grazzi
- Division of Neuroalgology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milano Italy
| | - D. D'Amico
- Division of Neuroalgology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milano Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment of medication overuse headache. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18:891-902. [PMID: 31174999 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30146-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2018] [Revised: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Regular or frequent use of analgesics and acute antimigraine drugs can increase the frequency of headache, and induce the transition from episodic to chronic headache or medication overuse headache. The 1-year prevalence of this condition in the general population is between 1% and 2%. Medication overuse headache is more common in women and in people with comorbid depression, anxiety, and other chronic pain conditions. Treatment of medication overuse headache has three components. First, patients need education and counselling to reduce the intake of medication for acute headache attacks. Second, some patients benefit from drug withdrawal (discontinuation of the overused medication). Finally, preventive drug therapy and non-medical prevention might be necessary in patients at onset of treatment or in patients who do not respond to the first two steps. The optimal therapeutic approach requires validation in controlled trials.
Collapse
|