1
|
Spagnolo M, Laudani C, Greco A, Giacoppo D, Capodanno D. Characteristics and Impact of Randomized Trials on Drugs or Devices in Cardiovascular Medicine. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2024; 24:651-661. [PMID: 39088111 PMCID: PMC11344709 DOI: 10.1007/s40256-024-00670-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clinical trials, essential for medical advancement, vary significantly in methodology and regulatory pathways depending on the type of therapeutic intervention (i.e., drugs or devices). This study aimed to determine whether the drug or device intervention types influence the impact of randomized trials in cardiovascular medicine. METHODS We analyzed late-breaking randomized controlled trials presented at major cardiology conferences from 2015 to 2021. The primary endpoint was the total number of citations obtained. Secondary endpoints included the number of citations at 1 and 2 years, number of total and 1-year mentions, and several metrics of study conduct and publication. Statistical analysis included tests for comparisons of continuous or categorical variables, based on their distribution, as appropriate. To adjust the results for potential confounders, univariable and multivariable regression models were utilized. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore both the effect of neutral or positive study outcomes on the comparative impact of drug versus device trials and the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the primary endpoint. RESULTS Of 382 eligible randomized trials, 227 (59.4%) were trials of drugs and 155 (40.6%) were trials of devices. Drug trials had a higher median number of total citations compared to device studies (93 [interquartile range {IQR} 48-137] vs. 82 [IQR 39-192]; p = 0.025). This difference was consistent at 1 and 2 years and was also observed in the number of total mentions and mentions at 1 year. All the metrics of study conduct and publication were similar, except for drug studies being more often stopped prematurely (8.8 vs. 1.9%; p = 0.006). After adjusting for multiple potential confounders, the difference in citations and mentions was no longer statistically significant. However, drug trials remained more likely to be stopped prematurely (adjusted odds ratio = 1.15; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.28; p = 0.009). Positive study outcomes significantly influenced the number of citations and the likelihood of a trial being stopped prematurely. CONCLUSIONS Drug trials are often stopped early and receive more citations and mentions than device trials. However, these differences are mainly due to factors other than the treatment itself. Studies published simultaneously tend to get more attention, and drug trials with positive results are cited more often than those with neutral results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Spagnolo
- Division of Cardiology, C.A.S.T., Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", University of Catania, Via S. Sofia, 78, 95100, Catania, Italy
| | - Claudio Laudani
- Division of Cardiology, C.A.S.T., Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", University of Catania, Via S. Sofia, 78, 95100, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Greco
- Division of Cardiology, C.A.S.T., Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", University of Catania, Via S. Sofia, 78, 95100, Catania, Italy
| | - Daniele Giacoppo
- Division of Cardiology, C.A.S.T., Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", University of Catania, Via S. Sofia, 78, 95100, Catania, Italy
| | - Davide Capodanno
- Division of Cardiology, C.A.S.T., Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", University of Catania, Via S. Sofia, 78, 95100, Catania, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Filetti S, Fenza G, Gallo A. Research design and writing of scholarly articles: new artificial intelligence tools available for researchers. Endocrine 2024; 85:1104-1116. [PMID: 39085566 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-024-03977-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
|
3
|
Lewis-Lloyd CA, Lobo DN. A comparison of the top 500 papers in Clinical Nutrition ranked by citation and Altmetric Attention Scores. Clin Nutr 2024; 43:1790-1797. [PMID: 38943805 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Citation scores (CS) have been traditionally used to measure the impact of scientific publications. Sourced from the Internet, Altmetric Attention Scores (AAS) are complementary metrics that assess how often publications are discussed and used globally. We compared by rank the top 500 papers by CS and AAS published in Clinical Nutrition with corresponding AAS and CS. METHODS A search for all publications in Clinical Nutrition was performed on Dimensions (https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication) on 3rd April 2024. Outputs were ranked according to CS and then by AAS with the top 500 in each category selected. Scores, year and type of publication were recorded. Correlation was expressed as the Spearman's rank coefficient (ϱ). RESULTS We identified 18,790 outputs. Within the top 500 publications ranked by CS, there was a significant weak positive correlation (ϱ = 0.235, P < 0.0001) between CS [median (IQR) 149 (116-223)] and AAS [7 (3-22)]. Ranked by AAS, there was a non-significant very weak positive correlation (ϱ = 0.072, P = 0.106) between AAS [55.5 (36-115)] and CS [42 (16.5-94.5)]. Trends remained similar when grouped by publication type. Guidelines, ranked by CS, had the highest CS and ranked by AAS, the highest CS and AAS. Publications per year, by year, ranked by CS, had a negatively skewed distribution peaking in 2012 and declined thereafter, but when ranked by AAS, had a moderately positive linear trend from 2001 to 2024 (ϱ = 0.513, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Correlation between CS and AAS was weak. Guidelines had the highest CS and AAS. CS are iterative taking years to mature while AAS are immediate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher A Lewis-Lloyd
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, Division of Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK. https://twitter.com/ChrisLewisLloyd
| | - Dileep N Lobo
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, Division of Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK; MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK; Division of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. https://twitter.com/DL08OMD
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Luo T, Li L, Wang Q, Liu W, Guo J, Yan Y, Chris N, Zhou Y, Zhao J. The changes in zoological publication rates and focal subdisciplines between 1960 and 2022. Integr Zool 2024. [PMID: 39075983 DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
Since ancient times, zoology, as the branch of biology dealing with animals, has been a cornerstone of natural science and has developed substantially over the last century. We conducted a bibliometric analysis using structural topic modeling (STM) to determine changes in the representation of principal zoological subdisciplines in the literature between 1960 and 2022. We collated a corpus of 217 414 articles from 88 top-ranked zoology journals and identified three main fields: (i) ecology, (ii) evolution, and (iii) applied research. Within these, we identified 10 major subdisciplines. The number of studies published per year grew from 118 in 1960 to 6635 in 2022. Macroscale-related subdisciplines increased while classical and traditional subdisciplines decreased. Mammals (34.4%) and insects (18.1%) were the dominant taxa covered, followed by birds (15.2%) and fish (8.0%). Research on mammals, insects, and fish involved a broad range of subdisciplines, whereas studies of birds focused on ecological subdisciplines. Most publications were from the United States, followed by the United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Australia, China, and Japan, with two developing countries, China and South Africa among the top 15 countries. There were different subdiscipline biases between countries, and the gross domestic product of each country correlated positively with its publication output (R2 = 0.681). We discuss our findings in the context of advances in technological innovations and computing power, as well as the emergence of ecology as a formal sister discipline, driven by changing environmental pressures and societal values. We caution that valuable publications from traditional zoological fields must not be completely supplanted by more contemporary topics and increasingly sophisticated analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianbao Luo
- College of Biological & Pharmaceutical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China
| | - Liyu Li
- College of Biological & Pharmaceutical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China
| | - Qian Wang
- College of Biological & Pharmaceutical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China
| | - Wentong Liu
- College of Biological & Pharmaceutical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China
| | - Jinyu Guo
- College of Biological & Pharmaceutical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China
| | - Yimei Yan
- College of Biological & Pharmaceutical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China
| | - Newman Chris
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Youbing Zhou
- College of Biological & Pharmaceutical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China
- Hubei International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Center of Ecological Conservation and Management in Three Gorges Area, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China
| | - Jin Zhao
- College of Biological & Pharmaceutical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China
- Hubei International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Center of Ecological Conservation and Management in Three Gorges Area, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Branch TA, Cȏté IM, David SR, Drew JA, LaRue M, Márquez MC, Parsons ECM, Rabaiotti D, Shiffman D, Steen DA, Wild AL. Controlled experiment finds no detectable citation bump from Twitter promotion. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0292201. [PMID: 38507397 PMCID: PMC10954115 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Multiple studies across a variety of scientific disciplines have shown that the number of times that a paper is shared on Twitter (now called X) is correlated with the number of citations that paper receives. However, these studies were not designed to answer whether tweeting about scientific papers causes an increase in citations, or whether they were simply highlighting that some papers have higher relevance, importance or quality and are therefore both tweeted about more and cited more. The authors of this study are leading science communicators on Twitter from several life science disciplines, with substantially higher follower counts than the average scientist, making us uniquely placed to address this question. We conducted a three-year-long controlled experiment, randomly selecting five articles published in the same month and journal, and randomly tweeting one while retaining the others as controls. This process was repeated for 10 articles from each of 11 journals, recording Altmetric scores, number of tweets, and citation counts before and after tweeting. Randomization tests revealed that tweeted articles were downloaded 2.6-3.9 times more often than controls immediately after tweeting, and retained significantly higher Altmetric scores (+81%) and number of tweets (+105%) three years after tweeting. However, while some tweeted papers were cited more than their respective control papers published in the same journal and month, the overall increase in citation counts after three years (+7% for Web of Science and +12% for Google Scholar) was not statistically significant (p > 0.15). Therefore while discussing science on social media has many professional and societal benefits (and has been a lot of fun), increasing the citation rate of a scientist's papers is likely not among them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor A. Branch
- School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Isabelle M. Cȏté
- Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Solomon R. David
- Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Joshua A. Drew
- Department of Environmental Biology, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, United States of America
| | - Michelle LaRue
- School of Earth and Environment, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Melissa C. Márquez
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - E. C. M. Parsons
- Centre for Ecology & Conservation, University of Exeter—Penryn Campus, Cornwall, United Kingdom
| | - D. Rabaiotti
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Shiffman
- Arizona State University, New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - David A. Steen
- Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Alexander L. Wild
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
May A. Looking at Cephalalgia from the inside. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231218381. [PMID: 38041828 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231218381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Arne May
- Arne May, Kopfschmerzambulanz, Institut für Systemische Neurowissenschaften, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rooney MK, Sharifi B, Ludmir EB, Fuller CD, Warner JL. Factors Associated With Altmetric Attention Scores for Randomized Phase III Cancer Clinical Trials. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2023; 7:e2300082. [PMID: 37552823 DOI: 10.1200/cci.23.00082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Altmetric Attention Scores (Altmetrics) are real-time measures of scientific impact and attention through various public outlets, including news, blogs, and social media. Herein, we aimed to describe and characterize the relationship between Altmetrics, conventional impact metrics, and features of published cancer clinical trials. METHODS We identified two-arm phase III cancer randomized clinical trials with a superiority end point and publication date between 2015 and 2020 from HemOnc and tabulated the following data: Altmetric, study positivity, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) registration trial status, cancer site/category, treatment context (curative or palliative), trial design, primary end point type, experimental/control arm modality, and journal tier. We further collected conventional bibliometrics including the number of citations and relative citation ratio (RCR) for all published studies. Multiple linear regression modeling identified clinical trial factors predictive of Altmetrics, with alpha = .05 defining statistical significance. RESULTS Altmetrics were found for 681 (98%) of 698 publications, with a median score of 38.5 (IQR, 13-132.8). FDA registration studies (β [95% CI], 84.7 [48.8 to 120.6]; P < .001), studies reporting on curative (as opposed to palliative) interventions (-29 [-53.7 to -4.4]; P = .02), genitourinary trials (73.2 [28.1 to 118.2]; P = .001), studies published in tier 1 journals (P < .001), and those with an increased number of citations per year (0.81 [0.66 to 0.95]; P < .001) were significantly associated with increased engagement as measured by Altmetrics. Furthermore, there was a strong correlation between all collected bibliometrics and Altmetrics (R2 = 0.63, 0.68, and 0.67; P < .001 for citation count, citations per year, and RCR, respectively). CONCLUSION FDA registration trials describing curative interventions, studies published in traditionally defined high-impact journals, and genitourinary trial publications tend to have the greatest Altmetrics. We observed a strong relationship between Altmetrics and conventional bibliometrics. The significance and consequences of these relationships warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Rooney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bahareh Sharifi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeremy L Warner
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
- Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kearns K, Shepard MJ, Sheehan JP. Social media and the Journal of Neuro-Oncology. J Neurooncol 2023; 162:453-454. [PMID: 36933053 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04282-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Kearns
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| | - Matthew J Shepard
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network Neuroscience Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Katsuki M, Matsumori Y, Kawahara J, Yamagishi C, Koh A, Kawamura S, Kashiwagi K, Kito T, Oguri M, Mizuno S, Nakamura K, Hayakawa K, Ohta O, Kubota N, Nakamura H, Aoyama J, Yamazaki I, Mizusawa S, Ueki Y, Nanri M, Miyakoshi Y, Gobo S, Entani A, Yamamoto T, Otake M, Ikeda T, Matsuo M, Yamagishi F. Headache education by leaflet distribution during COVID-19 vaccination and school-based on-demand e-learning: Itoigawa Geopark Headache Awareness Campaign. Headache 2023; 63:429-440. [PMID: 36705435 DOI: 10.1111/head.14472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We prospectively performed the Itoigawa Headache Awareness Campaign from August 2021 to June 2022, with two main interventions, and evaluated its effectiveness. BACKGROUND Headache is a common public health problem, but its burden could be reduced by raising awareness about headache and the appropriate use of acute and prophylactic medication. However, few studies on raising headache awareness in the general public have been reported. METHODS The target group was the general public aged 15-64. We performed two main interventions synergistically supported by other small interventions. Intervention 1 included leaflet distribution and a paper-based questionnaire about headache during COVID-19 vaccination, and intervention 2 included on-demand e-learning and online survey through schools. In these interventions, we emphasize the six important topics for the general public that were described in the Clinical Practice Guideline for Headache Disorders 2021. Each response among the two interventions' cohorts was collected on pre and post occasions. The awareness of the six topics before and after the campaign was evaluated. RESULTS We obtained 4016 valid responses from 6382 individuals who underwent vaccination in intervention 1 and 2577 from 594 students and 1983 parents in intervention 2; thus, 6593 of 20,458 (32.2%) of the overall working-age population in Itoigawa city experienced these interventions. The percentage of individuals' aware of the six topics significantly increased after the two main interventions ranging from 6.6% (39/594)-40.0% (1606/4016) to 64.1% (381/594)-92.6% (1836/1983) (p < 0.001, all). CONCLUSIONS We conducted this campaign through two main interventions with an improved percentage of individuals who know about headache. The two methods of community-based interventions could raise headache awareness effectively. Furthermore, we can achieve outstanding results by doing something to raise disease awareness during mass vaccination, when almost all residents gather in a certain place, and school-based e-learning without face-to-face instruction due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahito Katsuki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Itoigawa General Hospital, Itoigawa, Japan
| | - Yasuhiko Matsumori
- Department of Neurology, Sendai Headache and Neurology Clinic, Sendai, Japan
| | - Junko Kawahara
- Department of Health Promotion, Itoigawa City Servant Service, Itoigawa, Japan
| | - Chinami Yamagishi
- Department of Health Promotion, Itoigawa City Servant Service, Itoigawa, Japan
| | - Akihito Koh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Itoigawa General Hospital, Itoigawa, Japan
| | - Shin Kawamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Itoigawa General Hospital, Itoigawa, Japan
| | - Kenta Kashiwagi
- Department of Neurology, Itoigawa General Hospital, Itoigawa, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Kito
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nou National Health Insurance Clinic, Itoigawa, Japan
| | - Masato Oguri
- Department of Pediatrics, Itoigawa General Hospital, Itoigawa, Japan
| | - Shoji Mizuno
- Department of Pediatrics, Itoigawa General Hospital, Itoigawa, Japan
| | - Kentaro Nakamura
- Department of Pediatrics, Itoigawa General Hospital, Itoigawa, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | - Jun Aoyama
- Itoigawa Hakurei High School, Itoigawa, Japan
| | | | - Satoshi Mizusawa
- Board of Education, Itoigawa City Servant Service, Itoigawa, Japan
| | - Yasuhide Ueki
- Board of Education, Itoigawa City Servant Service, Itoigawa, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Akio Entani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Itoigawa General Hospital, Itoigawa, Japan
| | - Toshiko Yamamoto
- Department of Nursing, Itoigawa General Hospital, Itoigawa, Japan
| | - Miyako Otake
- Department of Nursing, Itoigawa General Hospital, Itoigawa, Japan
| | - Takashi Ikeda
- Department of Health Promotion, Itoigawa City Servant Service, Itoigawa, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Matsuo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Amirguliyev S, Zhang P, Al-Karagholi MAM, Do TP. Letter to the Editor regarding "Effect of Altmetric score on manuscript citations: A randomized-controlled trial". Cephalalgia 2022; 42:1436-1442. [PMID: 35929061 DOI: 10.1177/03331024221118925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarkhan Amirguliyev
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pengfei Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Rutgers University-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Mohammad Al-Mahdi Al-Karagholi
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thien Phu Do
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Danish Knowledge Center on Headache Disorders, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Valdemar Hansens Vej 2, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Can We Measure the Academic Impact of Social Media? Eur Urol 2022; 82:637-638. [PMID: 35851481 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|