Albumin loss in on-line hemodiafiltration

Effects of oral nutritional supplements on the nutritional status and inflammatory markers in patients on maintenance dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Background and aims

Patients on hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) often have insufficient energy and protein intake, resulting in poor nutritional status and adverse outcomes. Oral nutritional supplements (ONSs) are the most commonly used to increase such patients' energy and protein intakes.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we analyzed studies on nutritional status, inflammatory markers, and electrolyte levels in patients on dialysis receiving ONSs. We searched four electronic databases from inception until 31 December 2022, for randomized controlled trials comparing ONS treatment versus placebo or routine care.

Results

22 studies with 1185 patients on dialysis were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, the ONS group exhibited significantly increased serum albumin levels [1.26 g/l (95%CI, 0.50-2.02, P < 0.0001; I2 = 80.4%)], body mass indexes (BMIs) [0.30 kg/m2 (95%CI, 0.09-0.52, P = 0.005; I2 = 41.4%)], and handgrip strength (HGS) [0.96 kg (95%CI, 0.07-1.84, P = 0.034; I2 = 41.4%)] from baseline to the end of intervention. No significant differences were observed between the groups in lean body mass, phase angle, C-reactive protein, and serum phosphorus and potassium levels. In terms of improving albumin, the subgroup analyses show that ONS use seems to be more inclined to three variations: HD patients, short-term use, and non-intradialytic supplementation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, ONS use can improve the nutritional status of patients on dialysis in terms of their serum albumin, BMI, and HGS without significant effects on serum phosphorus, potassium, and C-reactive protein levels. However, it remains uncertain whether these results translate to improvement in clinically relevant outcomes. Large-scale high-quality studies are still required in this population.

Removal of Middle Molecules and Dialytic Albumin Loss: A Cross-over Study of Medium Cutoff and High-Flux Membranes with Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration

Key Points

HDF and MCO have shown greater clearance of middle-size uremic solutes in comparison with HF dialyzers; MCO has never been studied in HDF. MCO in HDF does not increase the clearance of B2M and results in a higher loss of albumin.

Background

Middle molecule removal and albumin loss have been studied in medium cutoff (MCO) membranes on hemodialysis (HD). It is unknown whether hemodiafiltration (HDF) with MCO membranes provides additional benefit. We aimed to compare the removal of small solutes and β 2-microglobulin (B2M), albumin, and total proteins between MCO and high-flux (HFX) membranes with both HD and HDF, respectively.

Methods

The cross-over study comprised 4 weeks, one each with postdilutional HDF using HFX (HFX-HDF), MCO (MCO-HDF), HD with HFX (HFX-HD), and MCO (MCO-HD). MCO and HFX differ with respect to several characteristics, including membrane composition, pore size distribution, and surface area (HFX, 2.5 m2; MCO, 1.7 m2). There were two study treatments per week, one after the long interdialytic interval and another midweek. Reduction ratios of vitamin B12, B2M, phosphate, uric acid, and urea corrected for hemoconcentration were computed. Dialysis albumin and total protein loss during the treatment were quantified from dialysate samples.

Results

Twelve anuric patients were studied (six female patients; 44±19 years; dialysis vintage 35.2±28 months). The blood flow was 369±23 ml/min, dialysate flow was 495±61 ml/min, and ultrafiltration volume was 2.8±0.74 L. No significant differences were found regarding the removal of B2M, vitamin B12, and water-soluble solutes between dialytic modalities and dialyzers. Albumin and total protein loss were significantly higher in MCO groups than HFX groups when compared with the same modality. HDF groups had significantly higher albumin and total protein loss than HD groups when compared with the same dialyzer. MCO-HDF showed the highest protein loss among all groups.

Conclusions

MCO-HD is not superior to HFX-HD and HFX-HDF for both middle molecule and water-soluble solute removal. Protein loss was more pronounced with MCO when compared with HFX on both HD and HDF modalities. MCO-HDF has no additional benefits regarding better removal of B2M but resulted in greater protein loss than MCO-HD.

Reconsidering adsorption in hemodialysis: is it just an epiphenomenon? A narrative review

Since the first attempt at extracorporeal renal replacement therapy, renal replacement therapy has been constantly improved. In the field of hemodialysis, substantial efforts have been made to improve toxin removal and biocompatibility. The advent of hemodiafiltration (HDF) and, more recently, of mid cut-off membranes have contributed to management of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Although several uremic toxins have been discovered, we know little about the clinical impact of their clearance in hemodialysis patients. In addition, a great deal of progress has been made in the areas of filtration and diffusion, but the adsorptive properties of hemodialysis membranes remain under-studied. The mechanism of action of adsorption is based on the attraction between the polymer of the dialysis membrane and the solutes, through hydrophobic interactions, ionic or electrostatic forces, hydrogen bonds or van der Waals forces. Adsorption on the dialysis membrane depends on the membrane surface, pore size, structure and electric load. Its involvement in toxin removal and biocompatibility is significant, and is not just an epiphenomenon. Diffusive and convective properties cannot be improved indefinitely and high permeability membranes, despite their high performance in the clearance of many toxins, have several limitations for long-term use in hemodialysis. This review will discuss why adsorption should be reconsidered and better characterized to improve efficiency and adequacy of dialysis.

Improvement of clinical outcomes in dialysis: No convincing superiority in dialysis efficacy using hemodiafiltration vs high-flux hemodialysis

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is not associated with lower mortality risk compared to standard hemodialysis (HD). However, there are many critical clinical outcomes in dialysis patients in addition to mortality; the impact of HDF on these other outcomes is not clear. This retrospective study included all patients referred to DaVita Clinics in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. High-flux HD was the initial modality in all patients. Those who did not achieve adequacy targets or those with poorly controlled phosphorus were switched to postdilution HDF using 18 to 23 L exchange per treatment. Patients dialyzing with a central venous catheter, patients who dialyzed less than 90 days at DaVita, and those with interrupted HDF were excluded. Of the 1115 patients, 215 (19%) were on HDF and 900 on high-flux HD; the median follow-up was 6 months for all patients. The HDF group showed a significant reduction in serum phosphate (P < .001), a significant increase in serum calcium (P < .012) and a significant improvement in Kt/V (P < .0001). The HDF group had significantly higher hemoglobin levels than the HD group (P = .024), with a significant reduction in weekly erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dose after starting HDF (P < .001). A modified protocol that included prolonged dialysis duration, larger-sized dialyzer, faster blood flow rates, and adding hemofiltration fluid may be helpful in achieving the recommended targets. Thus, HDF can enable the achievement of adequate dialysis care in some patients. Randomized-controlled clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings.

Albumin handling in different hemodialysis modalities

Hypoalbuminemia is a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. With increasing interest in highly permeable membranes and convective therapies to improve removal of middle molecules, transmembrane albumin loss increases accordingly. Currently, the acceptable upper limit of albumin loss for extracorporeal renal replacement therapies is unknown. In theory, any additional albumin loss should be minimized because it may contribute to hypoalbuminemia and adversely affect the patient's prognosis. However, hypoalbuminemia-associated mortality may be a consequence of inflammation and malnutrition, rather than low albumin levels per se. The purpose of this review is to give an overview of albumin handling with different extracorporeal renal replacement strategies. We conclude that the acceptable upper limit of dialysis-related albumin loss remains unknown. Whether enhanced middle molecule removal outweighs the potential adverse effects of increased albumin loss with novel highly permeable membranes and convective therapies is yet to be determined.

The effects of oral nutritional supplements in patients with maintenance dialysis therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Background/objective

This systematic review aims to determine the potential effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in patients receiving maintenance dialysis therapy (MDT).

Methods

Electronic databases were searched without language limits through to July 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved comparisons of ONS versus placebo or routine care are included in this meta-analysis. RevMan 5.3 statistical software was used for meta-analysis.

Results

15 articles with 589 subjects were included in our study. There are insufficient comparable data of randomized trials to allow meta-analysis of mortality. Albumin levels may be improved by the macronutrient blends or protein/amino acid supplements in MDT patients. Compared with the control group, serum albumin levels and BMI in the ONS group were increased by 1.58 g/L (95% CI, 0.52–2.63, P = 0.003; I² = 85%) and 0.40 kg/m² (95% CI, 0.10–0.71, P = 0.01; I² = 49%), respectively. In the subgroup analysis of patients receiving hemodialysis, albumin levels in ONS group were increased by 2.17 g/L (95% CI, 0.89–3.45, P<0.001; I² = 90%). ONS may not influence serum phosphorus and potassium levels.

Conclusions

Very low-quality evidence suggests that Short-term oral energy or protein/amino acid supplements may improve nutritional status by increasing serum albumin levels and BMI in MDT patients, without influence on serum potassium levels. High-quality and large RCTs, particularly regarding the effects of ONS on mortality and quality of life, are needed to further validate our findings.

Hydration and nutritional status in patients on home-dialysis-A single centre study

BACKGROUND

Over-hydration (OH) and malnutrition are prevalent among patients on dialysis therapy. The prevalence of OH and malnutrition as well as the risk factors associated with OH and malnutrition in our patients on home peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home haemodialysis (HD) are examined.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. The hydration and nutritional status of the study groups were assessed by a Body Composition Monitor. Patients who were stable on home dialysis therapy for over one year were invited to participate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify associated factors and determine the predictors of OH and malnutrition, respectively.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients (41 PD and 47 home HD) were recruited. A 32.95% of our patients on home dialysis therapy were in OH status. There was a significance difference in the prevalence of hydration status between patients on PD and home HD (p = 0.014), as overhydration was more common in patients on PD than home HD (46.34 vs. 21.28%). Dehydration was more common in patients on home HD than PD (29.79 vs. 9.76%). Male gender, decreasing haemoglobin level and presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) were risk factors of OH on multivariable analysis. There was no significance difference in the prevalence of malnutrition between patients on PD and home HD (p = 0.27). Increasing Fat Tissue Index (FTI), height and patients on PD therapy were at higher risk of malnutrition.

CONCLUSION

OH and malnutrition were prevalent patients on home dialysis therapy.

Association Between Hemodiafiltration and Hypoalbuminemia in Middle-Age Hemodialysis Patients

The advantage of hemodiafiltration (HDF) is well known. One of the disadvantages of HDF is loss of serum albumin, but this issue is still obscure. Some risk factors associated with mortality were age dependent. Studies on serum albumin/hypoalbuminemia and HDF in different age stratification were limited. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the role of HDF and other clinical variables on serum albumin values in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients of different age groups. We recruited a total of 1216 patients on MHD. Patients were divided into 4 groups by age stratification of youth (<30 years old), young-middle age (30-44 years old), middle age (45-64 years old), and old age (≥65  years old). Biochemical, hematological, nutritional, inflammatory parameters, and receiving HDF or not were recorded. The associations between age groups, HDF, and variables mentioned above were analyzed. Only in middle-age group, patients with HDF was significantly (P = 0.013) associated with serum albumin <4 g/dL. In middle-age group, a multivariate-forward logistic regression analysis showed that male sex (2.169 [1.029, 4.574], P = 0.042), inflammation (4.167 [2.043, 8.498], P < 0.001), cardiovascular disease (2.92 [1.019, 8.402], P = 0.046), serum creatinine level (0.639 [0.538, 0.758], P < 0.001), and cholesterol level (0.984 [0.975, 0.993], P = 0.001) were associated with serum albumin level <3.6 g/dL. Hepatitis C virus infection (1.911 [1.186, 3.077], P = 0.008), HDF (2.143 [1.298, 3.540], P = 0.003), inflammation (2.309 [1.549, 3.440], P < 0.001), use of arterio-venous fistula (0.518 [0.327, 0.820], P = 0.005), Kt/V (0.395 [0.193, 0.809], P = 0.011), nonanuria (0.542 [0.337, 0.870], P = 0.011), serum creatinine level (0.744 [0.669, 0.828], P < 0.001), and cholesterol level (0.993 [0.987, 0.998], P = 0.013) were associated with serum albumin level <4 g/dL. HDF can predict serum albumin level <4 g/dL in middle-age HD patients. The effect of age needs to be taken into consideration when interpreting the correlation between hypoalbuminemia and HDF.

High convection volume in online post-dilution haemodiafiltration: relevance, safety and costs

Increasing evidence suggests that treatment with online post-dilution haemodiafiltration (HDF) improves clinical outcome in patients with end-stage kidney disease, if compared with haemodialysis (HD). Although the primary analyses of three large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed inconclusive results, post hoc analyses of these and previous observational studies comparing online post-dilution HDF with HD showed that the risk of overall and cardiovascular mortality is lowest in patients who are treated with high-volume HDF. As such, the magnitude of the convection volume seems crucial and can be considered as the ‘dose’ of HDF. In this narrative review, the relevance of high convection volume in online post-dilution HDF is discussed. In addition, we briefly touch upon some safety and cost issues.

Online-haemodiafiltration vs. conventional haemodialysis: a cross-over study

BACKGROUND

The main short-term advantages of haemodiafiltration (HDF) are supposedly better removal of Beta2-microglobulin (ß2-m) and phosphate, and better haemodynamic stability. The main disadvantage is higher costs. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical and biological parameters associated with HDF and high-flux haemodialysis (HD), using a cross-over design, while maintaining the same dialysis parameters.

METHODS

All patients on a 3 × 4 hours schedule were observed during 3 identical 6-months periods: HDF1 - HD - HDF2. The mean values for the 2 last months of each period were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients (76 % males, 45 % diabetic) with a mean age of 74 ± 15 years, and who had been on dialysis for 49 ± 60 months were included. The mean blood flow (329 ± 27 ml/min), dialysate flow (500 ml/min), and convection volumes (21.6 ± 3.2 L) were recorded. Patient medications were not changed. Predialysis blood pressure, phosphataemia, calcaemia, iPTH, Kt/V, nPNA and intradialytic events were similar throughout the 3 periods. Only serum albumin (34. 4 ± 3.6, 35.9 ± 3.4, 34.1 ± 4 g/L, p < 0. 0001) and ß2-m serum levels (26.1 ± 5.4, 28 ± 6, 26.5 ± 5 mg/L, p < 0.001, values shown for HDF1, HD, HDF2, respectively) were significantly lower during the HDF periods. Factor associated with higher delta serum albumin levels between HD and HDF periods was mainly a lower convection volume.

CONCLUSION

Comparing HDF and HD, we did not observe any differences in haemodynamic stability or in serum phosphate levels. Only serum ß2-m (-6% vs. HD) and albumin (-5% vs. HD) levels changed. The long-term clinical consequences of these biochemical differences should be prospectively assessed.

Factors Associated with Albumin Loss in Post-Dilution Hemodiafiltration and Nutritional Consequences

Introduction

Hemodiafiltration is currently one of the most effective techniques of extra-renal purification but results in an increase of albumin loss in dialysate. We aimed to determine the factors associated with albumin loss during post-dilution hemodiafiltration, compare an “automatic” mode of infusate flow control versus a “manual” control, and assess the potential nutritional impact.

Methods

This prospective observational study included all hemodialysis patients in our institution who underwent post-dilution hemodiafiltration 3 times a week on a Fresenius 5008 for at least 2 months. At each session, albumin content was measured in a representative effluent dialysate volume. The automatic mode of the Fresenius 5008 was used for automatic infusate flow control.

Results

In all, 18 patients (mean age 60.7 ± 15 years) underwent 85 post-dilution hemodiafiltration sessions. The mean albumin loss was 3134 ± 2450 mg/session. Albumin loss was significantly affected by infusate flow, infusate volume, transmembrane pressure and ultrafiltration volume. The loss was greater with Toraysulfone and FX 1000 membranes rather than FX 80 or FX 100 membranes. With AutoSub rather than manual control, infusate flow was greater ( P<.001), transmembrane pressure was higher (P = .004), and the albumin loss was greater (P = .010). However, there was no correlation between albumin loss and nutritional variables.

Conclusions

Albumin loss during post-dilution hemodiafiltration was correlated with increased transmembrane pressure and infusate flow, especially AutoSub flow control, and type of membrane. However, this loss, when moderate, did not seem to affect nutritional aspects and should not limit the use of hemodiafiltration.

Engineering perspective on the evolution of push/pull-based dialysis treatments

The incidence of kidney disease is rapidly increasing worldwide, and techniques and devices for treating end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients have been evolving. Better outcomes achieved by convective treatment have encouraged the use of synthetic membranes with high water permeability in clinical setups, and high-flux hemodialysis (HD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF) are now preferred forms of convective therapy in ESRD patients. Push/pull-based dialysis strategies have also been examined to increase convective mass transfer in ESRD patients. The push/pull technique uses the entire membrane as a forward filtration domain for a period of time. However, backfiltration must accompany the forward filtration to compensate for the fluid depletion resulting from the forward filtration, making it necessary to switch the membranes to a backfiltration domain. This paper attempts to describe the advancement of push/pull-based renal supportive treatments in terms of their technical description, hemodialytic efficacy including fluid management accuracy and applicability for clinical use. How the optimization of push and pull actions could translate into better convective efficiency will also be discussed in depth.

Prevention and treatment of protein energy wasting in chronic kidney disease patients: a consensus statement by the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism

Protein energy wasting (PEW) is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, especially in individuals receiving maintenance dialysis therapy. A multitude of factors can affect the nutritional and metabolic status of CKD patients requiring a combination of therapeutic maneuvers to prevent or reverse protein and energy depletion. These include optimizing dietary nutrient intake, appropriate treatment of metabolic disturbances such as metabolic acidosis, systemic inflammation, and hormonal deficiencies, and prescribing optimized dialytic regimens. In patients where oral dietary intake from regular meals cannot maintain adequate nutritional status, nutritional supplementation, administered orally, enterally, or parenterally, is shown to be effective in replenishing protein and energy stores. In clinical practice, the advantages of oral nutritional supplements include proven efficacy, safety, and compliance. Anabolic strategies such as anabolic steroids, growth hormone, and exercise, in combination with nutritional supplementation or alone, have been shown to improve protein stores and represent potential additional approaches for the treatment of PEW. Appetite stimulants, anti-inflammatory interventions, and newer anabolic agents are emerging as novel therapies. While numerous epidemiological data suggest that an improvement in biomarkers of nutritional status is associated with improved survival, there are no large randomized clinical trials that have tested the effectiveness of nutritional interventions on mortality and morbidity.

Variation of clinical and laboratory features in chronic dialysis patients treated with high-flux hemodialysis after switching to online hemodiafiltration

PURPOSE

The study of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) benefits over high-flux hemodialysis (HD) raises great interest. The purpose was to compare clinical and laboratory parameters in patients treated with HD who were switched to HDF.

METHODS

Forty-eight HD patients (study group) were switched to HDF, while other 521 patients remained on HD as a control group. During last 6 HD months and during first year of HDF, we determined in both groups the following parameters: monthly-weekly dialysis time, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), interdialytic body weight gain (IBWG), blood flow rate (Qb), weekly erythropoietin-stimulating agents dose (EPO), single-pool Kt/V, calcium, phosphorus (P), hemoglobin and normalized protein catabolic ration (nPCR), plus every 3 months--albumin, parathormone (PTH), ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT). In both groups, parameters in the last 6 HD months were compared to those in the first 6 months and, respectively, to those in the first year of HDF.

RESULTS

In the study group, albumin and nPCR were significantly higher in the HD period not only compared to the first 6 months of HDF, but also compared to the first year of HDF. IBWG and P were higher with HD compared to the first year of HDF, but not with the first 6 months. PTH, Kt/V, Qb and EPO were higher in both HDF periods. In the control group, albumin was significantly higher in the first 6 months after the switch, but it was significantly lower in the first year. BMI, ferritin, PTH, Kt/V, Qb, TSAT and weekly dialysis time were higher in both HDF periods, while nPCR, EPO, SBP and DBP were lower. IBWG and Hb rose only during the first year after the switch, while P was lower in the first year, but not in the first 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Nutrition, assessed by albumin, nPCR and BMI, was not improved by HDF compared to HD. With HDF, Kt/V and phosphorus control were better, similar results were observed in the control group. A larger EPO dose was needed with HDF for maintaining a similar hemoglobin level.

Hemodiafiltration improves plasma 25-hepcidin levels: a prospective, randomized, blinded, cross-over study comparing hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration

Background/Aims

Data from studies comparing the effect of hemodiafiltration (HDF) and conventional hemodialysis (HD) on clinically important outcomes are insufficient to support superiority of HDF. None of these studies has been participant-blinded.

Methods

We performed a prospective, randomized, and patient-blinded cross-over study. Twenty patients on chronic HD received either HD for 2 months followed by post-dilution HDF for 2 months or in opposite order. A range of clinical parameters, as well as markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and iron metabolism was measured.

Results

The two treatments were similar with respect to dialysis-related complications, quality of life, and the biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation. Compared to HD, 25-hepcidin and β₂-microglobulin were 38 and 32%, respectively, lower after 60 days of HDF (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). The consumption of ESA (erythropoietin-stimulating agent) and LMWH (low-molecular-weight heparin) was significantly higher with HDF.

Conclusion

In short term, HDF is not superior to HD regarding dialysis-related complications. The higher ESA consumption observed with HDF can be explained by blood clotting in tubing and dialyzers, as more anticoagulation was needed with post-dilution HDF. In a longer perspective, lowering serum hepcidin levels may improve pathological iron homeostasis.

Transmembrane pressure modulation in high-volume mixed hemodiafiltration to optimize efficiency and minimize protein loss

The aim of the present study was transmembrane pressure (TMP) modulation in high-volume mixed hemodiafiltration (HDF) to optimize efficiency and minimize protein loss. The optimal flow/pressure conditions in on-line mixed HDF assisted with a feedback control of TMP were defined in this prospective randomized study in order to obtain maximal efficiency in solute removal while minimizing potential side effects. Two different TMP profiles in mixed HDF were compared in 12 unselected patients who underwent two study periods of 2 weeks each in cross-over randomized sequence: (A) constant TMP at around 300 mmHg and (B) profiled TMP, in which TMP was slowly increased from a low initial value to the maximal value. In both procedures, the mean volume exchange was 10.6+/-1.4 l/h. Mean filtration fraction was 53%. Instantaneous beta2-microglobulin (beta2-m) clearance was higher at the start of the session with profiled TMP (207+/-35 vs 194+/-28 ml/min, P<0.005), whereas no differences were found at the end (135+/-19 vs 132+/-19 ml/min). Profiled TMP resulted in a higher mean beta2-m clearance of the session (97.0+/-15.4 vs 87.8+/-18.3 ml/min, P<0.01), in lower albumin loss in the first 30 min (0.62+/-0.14 vs 0.98+/-0.18 g, P<0.0001), and, in the whole session (3.98+/-1.19 vs 5.24+/-0.77 g, P<0.001), in higher dialyzer ultrafiltration coefficients and lower resistance indexes. This study showed that the TMP feedback modulation in mixed HDF was highly effective in maintaining very high ultrafiltration rates and filtration fractions, and minimized potential side effects as a result of the improved preservation of membrane permeability and more favorable dialyzer pressure regimen.

Protein-Leaking Membranes for Hemodialysis: A New Class of Membranes in Search of an Application?

A new class of membranes that leak protein has been developed for hemodialysis. These membranes provide greater clearances of low molecular weight proteins and small protein-bound solutes than do conventional high-flux dialysis membranes but at the cost of some albumin loss into the dialysate. Protein-leaking membranes have been used in a small number of clinical trials. The results of these trials suggest that protein-leaking membranes improve anemia correction, decrease plasma total homocysteine concentrations, and reduce plasma concentrations of glycosylated and oxidized proteins. However, it is not clear yet that routine use of protein-leaking membranes is warranted. Specific uremic toxins that are removed by protein-leaking membranes but not conventional high-flux membranes have not been identified. It is also unclear whether protein-leaking membranes offer benefits beyond those obtained with conventional high-flux membranes used in convective therapies, such as hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration. Finally, the amount of albumin loss that can be tolerated by hemodialysis patients in a long-term therapy has yet to be determined. Protein-leaking membranes offer a new approach to improving outcomes in hemodialysis, but whether their benefits will outweigh their disadvantages will require more basic and clinical research.

Removal of the protein-bound solute p-cresol by convective transport: a randomized crossover study

BACKGROUND

Middle molecules (MMs) and protein-bound solutes are poorly removed by conventional hemodialysis (HD). Hemodiafiltration (HDF) combines convection and diffusion in a single therapy and has been shown to be superior for the elimination of several small and larger retention molecules. Information on the elimination of protein-bound solutes during convective strategies is scarce. The primary aim of this randomized crossover study is to evaluate the influence of internal filtration, postdilution HDF, and predilution HDF on removal of the protein-bound solute p-cresol.

METHODS

Fourteen stable patients on regular thrice-weekly medium-flux HD therapy were assigned to 5 treatment periods of 2 weeks each for: HD with HF80(S); HD with FX80; postdilution HDF, 20 L, with FX80; predilution HDF, 20 L, with FX80; and predilution HDF, 60 L, with FX80 (all dialyzers from Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany).

RESULTS

As for the water-soluble solutes, elimination of p-cresol was better during HDF and increased with greater filtration volumes. Removal of beta2-microglobulin (beta2m) also was enhanced during HDF. However, the positive effect of convection was offset when high predilution substitution volumes were applied, probably as a result of dilution. Within each dialytic approach, removal of the MM beta2m and the protein-bound solute p-cresol was significantly less than that of the water-soluble molecules urea nitrogen and creatinine.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that convection can provide superior protein-bound solute removal compared with high-flux HD. Our findings also suggest that better elimination of the unbound fraction is the most plausible underlying mechanism.

Beta-2 microglobulin in ESRD: an in-depth review

Beta-2 microglobulin is the most widely studied low-molecular-weight protein in end-stage renal disease. It is known to cause dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA), by virtue of its retention when renal function fails, its deposition in tissues, its aggregation into fibrils, and its ability to become glycosylated. The onset of DRA may be protracted by the use of noncellulosic membranes, especially when high-volume hemodiafiltration is used in the treatment of renal failure. Adsorptive methods have been developed to improve the removal of beta-2 microglobulin. There seems to be a relative risk reduction in mortality when patients are treated with dialysis membranes that have a higher clearance of beta-2 microglobulin.

Evolution of oxidative stress and inflammation during hemodialysis and their contribution to cardiovascular disease

End-stage renal disease patients have increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. These patients have many unique risk factors, such as an accumulation of uremic toxins, electrolyte imbalances, metabolic disturbances, anemia, chronic inflammation, and thrombogenic disturbances. Oxidative stress has been implicated in many of these disturbances. This review will focus on some of the factors that may accelerate cardiovascular disease in uremic patients, with an emphasis on mechanisms and interactions of various components of oxidative stress and inflammation. Understanding the mechanisms of these pathways may be useful in developing effective prevention and treatment strategies.