1
|
Plys E, Szapary C, Vranceanu AM. Flexibly Incorporating the Dyad into Psychosocial Intervention: Considerations for Neuropalliative Care. Semin Neurol 2024. [PMID: 39362315 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2024]
Abstract
This paper reviews dyadic psychosocial intervention approaches that flexibly incorporate both dyad members despite challenges to equitable involvement due to cognitive limitations or limited availability. We provide an overview, analysis, and examples for the following dyadic intervention approaches: (1) shared interventions that involve each dyad member equitably (i.e., higher care recipient cognition, higher care-partner availability); (2) patient-focused interventions that primarily engage care recipients with early stages of neurocognitive disorders, yet include care-partners in select sessions and target dyadic and relationship needs (i.e., higher care recipient cognition, lower care-partner availability); and (3) care-partner focused interventions that primarily engage care-partners, yet still address care recipient and relationship needs (i.e., lower care recipient cognition, higher care-partner availability). In our review, we propose a flexible definition of dyadic psychosocial intervention that considers the continuum of individuals' involvement, measurement, content, and conceptual background. We conclude with a discussion of implications for neuropalliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Plys
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Claire Szapary
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Collett J, Lawrie S, Bromley S, Harling P, Reed A, Brusco N, Coe S, Coebergh J, Carroll C, Roberts HC, Hu MT, Dawes H. A programme evaluation of 'First Steps': A peer-conceived, developed and led self-management intervention for people after a Parkinson's diagnosis. Clin Rehabil 2024; 38:403-413. [PMID: 37941369 PMCID: PMC10829422 DOI: 10.1177/02692155231210969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A diagnosis of Parkinson's often leads to uncertainty about the future and loss of perceived control. Peer support may offer a means to address these concerns and promote self-management. DESIGN A programme evaluation of the feasibility and potential effects of 'First Steps', utilising a pragmatic step wedge approach. Comparing First Steps (intervention) to (control) conditions.Setting: In the community at four sites in southern England.Participants: Newly diagnosed (≤ 12months) people with Parkinson's.Intervention: First Steps was a 2-day peer-conceived, developed and led intervention to support self-management.Main measures: At 0, 12 and 24 weeks anxiety and depression (Hospital, Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), daily functioning (World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS), physical activity, quality of life (EQ5D), carer strain and service utilisation were assessed. RESULTS Between February 2018 and July 2019, 36 participants were enrolled into intervention and 21 to control conditions, all were included in statistical analysis. Lost to follow up was n = 1 (intervention) and n = 1 adverse event was reported (control, unrelated). Of the 36 allocated to the intervention n = 22 participants completed both days of First Steps during the study period. Completion of outcome measures was >95% at 24 weeks. Small effects favouring the intervention were found for HADS (odds ratio (OR) = 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24:17.84), Carer Strain Index (OR = 2.22, 95% CI 0.5:9.76) and vigorous (d = 0.42, 95% CI -0.12:0.97) and total physical activity (d = 0.41, 95% CI -0.13:0.95). EQ5D, WHOSDAS and service utilisation, was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS First Steps was feasible and safe and we found potential to benefit physical activity, mental health and carer strain. Further research with longer-term follow up is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnny Collett
- Centre for Movement, Occupational and Rehabilitation Sciences, OxINMAHR Oxford Brookes University, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Sophie Lawrie
- Centre for Movement, Occupational and Rehabilitation Sciences, OxINMAHR Oxford Brookes University, Oxfordshire, UK
| | | | | | - Alex Reed
- European Parkinson's Therapy Centre, Brescia, Italy
| | - Natasha Brusco
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Rehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Frankston, Australia
| | - Shelly Coe
- Centre for Movement, Occupational and Rehabilitation Sciences, OxINMAHR Oxford Brookes University, Oxfordshire, UK
- Centre for Nutrition and Health, OxINMAHR Oxford Brookes University, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Jan Coebergh
- Department of Neurology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Neurology, Ashford St Peter's NHS Foundation Trust, Chertsey, UK
| | - Camille Carroll
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Helen C Roberts
- Academic Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Michele T Hu
- Oxford Parkinson's Disease Centre, Division of Neurology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Helen Dawes
- NIHR Exeter BRC, Medical School, University of Exeter, Devon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aamodt WW, Kluger BM, Mirham M, Job A, Lettenberger SE, Mosley PE, Seshadri S. Caregiver Burden in Parkinson Disease: A Scoping Review of the Literature from 2017-2022. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2024; 37:96-113. [PMID: 37551798 PMCID: PMC10802092 DOI: 10.1177/08919887231195219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
Caregiver burden is a term that refers to the adverse effect of caregiving on the physical, emotional, social, spiritual, and financial well-being of the caregiver. Caregiver burden is associated with providing care to an individual with a chronic illness or disability, and the unique symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD) can amplify a patient's needs and reliance on others, leading to adverse outcomes for patients and their caregivers. In this scoping review of the literature from January 2017 through April 2022 that included 114 studies, we provide an updated, evidence-based summary of patient and caregiver-related factors that contribute to caregiver burden in PD. We also describe the impact of caregiver stress and burden on caregivers based on qualitative research studies and review recent interventions to mitigate burden. By providing clinical updates for practitioners, this review is designed to improve recognition of caregiver burden in the post-pandemic era and foster the development of targeted interventions to reduce caregiver burden in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitley W. Aamodt
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Translational Center of Excellence for Neuroepidemiology and Neurology Outcomes Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Benzi M. Kluger
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Miray Mirham
- School of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Anna Job
- University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Philip E. Mosley
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Sandhya Seshadri
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sun WJ, Peng YJ, Liang Y. Barriers and facilitators for healthcare providers to implement family-centered care in Parkinson's disease: a scoping review. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1231654. [PMID: 37693752 PMCID: PMC10486989 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1231654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims This study aimed to identify and synthesize the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of family-centered care in Parkinson's disease (PD) and to provide a reference for evidence-based Parkinson's disease nursing practice. Methods This scoping review follows the methodology framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. Four databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. Barriers and facilitators were summarized based on the ecological family-centered model. Results Through a comprehensive literature search, 35 studies were found for this scoping review. Barriers and facilitators to implementing family-centered care in PD included physiological factors, environmental factors, culturally based conflicts, living arrangements, education or skills training, group experiences, and individual and family consultations. Conclusion Implementing family-centered care in Parkinson's disease is essential to providing comprehensive care that improves outcomes for both PD patients and their family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Jing Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ye-Jie Peng
- West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University/Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yan Liang
- West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University/Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Taking Care of Us© (TCU) study protocol: feasibility and acceptability of a dyadic intervention for couples living with heart failure. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:16. [PMID: 36698174 PMCID: PMC9875187 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01249-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are more than 1 million hospital admissions and 3 million emergency visits for heart failure in the USA annually. Although spouse/partners make substantial contributions to the management of heart failure and experience poor health and high levels of care strain, they are rarely the focus of heart failure interventions. This protocol describes a pilot randomized controlled trial that tests the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary change in outcomes of a seven-session couple-based intervention called Taking Care of Us© (TCU). The TCU© intervention is grounded in the theory of dyadic illness management and was developed to promote collaborative illness management and better physical and mental health of adults with heart failure and their partners. METHODS A two-arm randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Eligible adults with heart failure and their co-residing spouse/partner will be recruited from a clinical site in the USA and community/social media outreach and randomized to either the TCU© intervention or to a control condition (SUPPORT©) that offers education around heart failure management. The target sample is 60 couples (30 per arm). TCU© couples will receive seven sessions over 2 months via Zoom; SUPPORT© couples will receive three sessions over 2 months via Zoom. All participants will complete self-report measures at baseline (T1), post-treatment (T2), and 3 months post-treatment (T3). Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention will be examined using both closed-ended and open-ended questions as well as enrollment, retention, completion, and satisfaction metrics. Preliminary exploration of change in outcomes of TCU© on dyadic health, dyadic appraisal, and collaborative management will also be conducted. DISCUSSION Theoretically driven, evidence-based dyadic interventions are needed to optimize the health of both members of the couple living with heart failure. Results from this study will provide important information about recruitment and retention and benefits and drawbacks of the TCU© program to directly inform any needed refinements of the program and decision to move to a main trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04737759) registered on 27 January 2021.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ressler I, Gershfeld-Litvin A. Living with Parkinson’s disease: A qualitative study of spousal perspectives. J Health Psychol 2022; 28:541-553. [PMID: 36337043 PMCID: PMC10119893 DOI: 10.1177/13591053221134740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Research has demonstrated that Parkinson’s disease can have adverse psychological effects on caregivers. Very few studies have focused on the experiences of spouses who are not primary caregivers or who do not identify as primary caregivers. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of spouses who are not primary caregivers or do not identify as primary caregivers. Twelve Israeli women, spouses of men with Parkinson’s disease, were interviewed using a semi-structured in-depth approach. Thematic analysis revealed five themes: before diagnosis, at diagnosis, after diagnosis, interpersonal ways of coping, and intrapersonal ways of coping. A dynamic of oscillation between confronting and avoiding losses was indicated. Non-death losses were mostly unacknowledged among spouses’ social circles. Results were interpreted in the context of grieving processes after diagnosis. Findings suggest a need for psychological interventions aimed at creating safe spaces for spouses to engage in a grieving process after diagnosis.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ahern L, Timmons PS, Lamb PSE, McCullagh DR. Can behavioural change interventions improve self-efficacy and exercise adherence among people with Parkinson’s? A systematic review protocol. HRB Open Res 2022; 5:15. [PMID: 36101872 PMCID: PMC9440372 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13474.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
:People with Parkinson’s (PwP) have a higher tendency to adopt sedentary lifestyle behaviours and have lower physical activity levels compared to their healthy peers. Previous research has indicated that personal factors including poor outcome expectation and low self-efficacy are stronger predictors of exercise adherence than disease severity.
: The purpose of this review is to synthesize the best available evidence on interventions that encompass self-management strategies to overcome barriers to exercise and improve self-efficacy and exercise adherence among PwP. Methods
: The following databases will be searched using a comprehensive search strategy: EBSCO, Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library from database inception to 2020. Interventional studies including behavioural change interventions will be included in this review. The title, abstract and full-text screening will be conducted by two independent reviewers. The Joanne Briggs Institute Checklist will be used to assess the quality of each included study. Data will be extracted by two independent reviewers. The outcomes of interest will be self-efficacy outcomes and measures of exercise adherence. A systematic narrative synthesis will be conducted using a framework analysis, applying the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel, producing findings focusing on practice-orientated outcomes. Presentation of data will include tables and text summarizing the characteristics and findings of the eligible studies. Data synthesis and statistical analysis will be performed in Review manager 5.3. The quality of evidence will be reviewed using the GRADE criteria. Discussion
: The review will comprehensively synthesize the available evidence on interventions to enhance self-efficacy, improve quality of life, physical function, ultimately improving exercise adherence among PwP and provide invaluable information for healthcare professionals.. This review will make recommendations for appropriate self-management strategies for maximum effect and may have implications for policy and practice regarding enhancing self-efficacy and long-term exercise adherence among PwP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leanne Ahern
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Therapies, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Prof Suzanne Timmons
- Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine,, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | | | - Dr Ruth McCullagh
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Therapies, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Leung T, Akram F, Lee J, Klostermann EC, Hess SP, Myrick E, Levin M, Ouyang B, Wilkinson J, Hall D, Chodosh J. Peer Mentoring Program for Informal Caregivers of Homebound Individuals With Advanced Parkinson Disease (Share the Care): Protocol for a Single-Center, Crossover Pilot Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e34750. [PMID: 35481819 PMCID: PMC9185354 DOI: 10.2196/34750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Homebound individuals with advanced Parkinson disease (PD) require intensive caregiving, the majority of which is provided by informal, family caregivers. PD caregiver strain is an independent risk factor for institutionalization. There are currently no effective interventions to support advanced PD caregivers. Studies in other neurologic disorders, however, have demonstrated the potential for peer mentoring interventions to improve caregiver outcomes. In the context of an ongoing trial of interdisciplinary home visits, we designed and piloted a nested trial of caregiver peer mentoring for informal caregivers of individuals with advanced PD. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of peer mentoring for caregivers of homebound individuals with advanced PD and to evaluate its effects on anxiety, depression, and caregiver strain. METHODS This was a single-center, 16-week pilot study of caregiver peer mentoring nested within a year-long controlled trial of interdisciplinary home visits. We recruited 34 experienced former or current family caregivers who completed structured mentor training. Caregivers enrolled in the larger interdisciplinary home visit trial consented to receive 16 weeks of weekly, one-to-one peer mentoring calls with a trained peer mentor. Weekly calls were guided by a curriculum on advanced PD management and caregiver support. Fidelity to and satisfaction with the intervention were gathered via biweekly study diaries. Anxiety, depression, and caregiver strain were measured pre- and postmentoring intervention at home visits 2 and 3. RESULTS Enrollment and peer-mentor training began in 2018, and 65 caregivers enrolled in the overarching trial. The majority of mentors and mentees were White, female spouses or partners of individuals with PD; mentors had a mean of 8.7 (SD 6.4) years of caregiving experience, and 33 mentors were matched with at least 1 mentee. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study of caregiver peer mentoring in PD and may establish an adaptable and sustainable model for disease-specific caregiver interventions in PD and other neurodegenerative diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03189459; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03189459. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/34750.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Erica Myrick
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, Chicago, US.,Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, US
| | - Melissa Levin
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, 1725 w Harrison St., Chicago, US.,Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, US
| | - Bichun Ouyang
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, 1725 w Harrison St., Chicago, US
| | - Jayne Wilkinson
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, 1725 w Harrison St., Chicago, US.,Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, US
| | - Deborah Hall
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, 1725 w Harrison St., Chicago, US
| | - Joshua Chodosh
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 227 E. 30th St.TRB 839, New York, US.,VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, Medicine Service, New York, US
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ahern L, Timmons PS, Lamb PSE, McCullagh DR. Can behavioural change interventions improve self-efficacy and exercise adherence among people with Parkinson’s? A systematic review protocol. HRB Open Res 2022; 5:15. [DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13474.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Context: People with Parkinson’s (PwP) have a higher tendency to engage in sedentary lifestyle behaviours and have lower physical activity levels compared to their healthy peers. Previous research has indicated that personal factors including poor outcome expectation and low self-efficacy are stronger predictors of exercise adherence than disease severity. Objectives: The purpose of this review is to synthesize the best available evidence on interventions that encompass self-management strategies to overcome barriers to exercise and improve self-efficacy and exercise adherence among PwP. Methods: The following databases will be searched using a comprehensive search strategy: EBSCO, Medline, Cinhal, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library from database inception to 2020. The title, abstract and full-text screening will be conducted by two independent reviewers. The Joanne Briggs Institute Checklist will be used to assess the quality of each included study. The quality of evidence will be reviewed using the GRADE criteria. Data will be extracted by two independent reviewers. The outcomes of interest will be self-efficacy outcomes and measures of exercise adherence. A systematic narrative synthesis will be conducted using a framework analysis, applying the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel, producing findings focusing on practice-orientated outcomes. Presentation of data will include tables and text summarizing the characteristics and findings of the eligible studies. Discussion: The review will synthesize the best available evidence on interventions to enhance self-efficacy, improve quality of life, physical function, and ultimately improve exercise adherence among PwP and provide invaluable information for healthcare professionals. The findings of this review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conference proceedings. This review will make recommendations for appropriate self-management strategies for maximum effect and may have implications for policy and practice regarding enhancing self-efficacy and long-term exercise adherence among PwP.
Collapse
|
10
|
Pigott JS, Kane EJ, Ambler G, Walters K, Schrag A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness of self-management interventions in Parkinson's disease. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:45. [PMID: 35016613 PMCID: PMC8753859 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02656-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parkinson's disease is a complex neurodegenerative condition with significant impact on quality of life (QoL), wellbeing and function. The objective of this review is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of self-management interventions for people with Parkinson's disease, taking a broad view of self-management and considering effects on QoL, wellbeing and function. METHODS Systematic searches of four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science) were conducted for studies evaluating self-management interventions for people with Parkinson's disease published up to 16th November 2020. Original quantitative studies of adults with idiopathic Parkinson's disease were included, whilst studies of atypical Parkinsonism were excluded. Full-text articles were independently assessed by two reviewers, with data extracted by one reviewer and reliability checked by a second reviewer, then synthesised through a narrative approach and, for sufficiently similar studies, a meta-analysis of effect size was conducted (using a random-effects meta-analysis with restricted maximum likelihood method pooled estimate). Interventions were subdivided into self-management components according to PRISMS Taxonomy. Risk of bias was examined with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool or ROBIN-I tool as appropriate. RESULTS Thirty-six studies were included, evaluating a diverse array of interventions and encompassing a range of study designs (RCT n = 19; non-randomised CT n = five; within subject pre- and post-intervention comparisons n = 12). A total of 2884 participants were assessed in studies across ten countries, with greatest output from North America (14 studies) and UK (six studies). Risk of bias was moderate to high for the majority of studies, mostly due to lack of participant blinding, which is not often practical for interventions of this nature. Only four studies reported statistically significant improvements in QoL, wellbeing or functional outcomes for the intervention compared to controls. These interventions were group-based self-management education and training programmes, either alone, combined with multi-disciplinary rehabilitation, or combined with Cognitive Behaviour Therapy; and a self-guided community-based exercise programme. Four of the RCTs evaluated sufficiently similar interventions and outcomes for meta-analysis: these were studies of self-management education and training programmes evaluating QoL (n = 478). Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the self-management and the control groups with a standardised mean difference (Hedges g) of - 0.17 (- 0.56, 0.21) p = 0.38. By the GRADE approach, the quality of this evidence was deemed "very low" and the effect of the intervention is therefore uncertain. Components more frequently observed in effective interventions, as per PRISMS taxonomy analysis, were: information about resources; training or rehearsing psychological strategies; social support; and lifestyle advice and support. The applicability of these findings is weakened by the ambiguous and at times overlapping nature of self-management components. CONCLUSION Approaches and outcomes to self-management interventions in Parkinson's disease are heterogenous. There are insufficient high quality RCTs in this field to show effectiveness of self-management interventions in Parkinson's disease. Whilst it is not possible to draw conclusions on specific intervention components that convey effectiveness, there are promising findings from some studies, which could be targeted in future evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Pigott
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Edward J Kane
- South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gareth Ambler
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anette Schrag
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
- UCL Institute of Neurology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Weitkamp K, Feger F, Landolt SA, Roth M, Bodenmann G. Dyadic Coping in Couples Facing Chronic Physical Illness: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol 2021; 12:722740. [PMID: 34759866 PMCID: PMC8573212 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Chronic physical illness affects not only patients but also their partners. Dyadic coping (DC)-the ways couples cope in dealing with a stressor such as chronic illness-has received increased attention over the last three decades. The aim of the current study was to summarize the state of research on DC in couples with chronic physical illnesses. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies published between 1990 and 2020, assessing DC in couples affected by severe physical illnesses. We used DC and related search terms for the literature search in Psycinfo, Psyndex, and Medline. Five thousand three hundred thirty studies were identified in three electronic databases and 49 of these were included in the review (5,440 individuals reported on 2,820 dyads). We excluded studies on cancer, cardiovascular disease, and multiple sclerosis because of existing reviews in the respective fields. Half of the studies included were on diabetes. Other studies were on arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Huntington's disease, lupus erythematosus, Parkinson's disease, renal diseases, stroke, and endometriosis. Two raters extracted data using a predefined protocol, including study quality. Results were collated in a narrative synthesis organized by illness and DC operationalization. Results: Overall, DC was associated with beneficial outcomes in physical health, well-being, and relationship satisfaction. Differential effects became apparent for certain chronic conditions potentially depending on certain disease characteristics, such as early-onset, sudden-onset, or life-threatening conditions. Conclusion: Facing challenges together as a couple seemed indispensable for adapting to a diverse range of demands related to chronic illnesses with some specific demands of particular chronic diseases. There is a need for the development of truly dyadic interventions with an eye on the specific challenges of the various chronic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Weitkamp
- Clinical Psychology Children/Adolescents and Couples/Families, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabienne Feger
- ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Science, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Selina A Landolt
- Clinical Psychology Children/Adolescents and Couples/Families, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michelle Roth
- Clinical Psychology Children/Adolescents and Couples/Families, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Guy Bodenmann
- Clinical Psychology Children/Adolescents and Couples/Families, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hulshoff MJ, Book E, Dahodwala N, Tanner CM, Robertson C, Marras C. Current Knowledge on the Evolution of Care Partner Burden, Needs, and Coping in Parkinson's Disease. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2021; 8:510-520. [PMID: 33981783 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Care partners support people with Parkinson's disease through a long journey ranging from independence to dependence for many daily tasks. Longitudinal studies are important to understand the evolution of this process and predictors of future needs of care partners. Methods A scoping review was conducted, searching PubMed for longitudinal studies examining care partner burden, needs or coping in Parkinson's disease published through May 2020. Results Eight observational studies and 19 interventional studies met the eligibility criteria. Longitudinal observation ranged from 7 weeks to 10 years, involving between six and 8515 care partners. All studies addressed care partner burden, while two and three studies respectively addressed needs and coping. Only one study related burden to specific stages or duration of disease. Results from identified studies show that care partners in Parkinson's disease are at risk for increasing burden over time. Multiple predictors of future burden have been identified related to the person with Parkinson's disease, the care partner, or an intervention. No studies examined the evolution of needs and coping in caregiving in Parkinson's disease. Conclusion The scarcity of longer term, observational research on the temporal evolution of burden and particularly needs and coping in caregiving for someone with PD is a main identified gap. Even within these observational studies, the impact of caregiving is not often reported. Longitudinal studies on these topics are needed to help understand their change over time and relation to each other, which can inform support planning for care partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max J Hulshoff
- Department of Neurology and Parkinson Center Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | - Elaine Book
- Pacific Parkinson's Research Centre University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Nabila Dahodwala
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Caroline M Tanner
- Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neuroscience University of California - San Francisco, and Parkinson's Disease Research Education and Clinical Center, San Francisco Veteran's Affairs Medical Center San Francisco California USA
| | | | - Connie Marras
- Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Centre and the Edmond J Safra Program in Parkinson's Research Toronto Western Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Self-Management Components as Experienced by People with Parkinson's Disease and Their Carers: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of the Qualitative Literature. PARKINSONS DISEASE 2020; 2020:8857385. [PMID: 33489082 PMCID: PMC7787805 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8857385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Background Self-management strategies are important in healthcare for people with Parkinson's to improve daily living. There is limited evidence on effectiveness in Parkinson's, and the active components of effective self-management strategies are uncertain. This review aims to identify and synthesise the qualitative evidence regarding the experiences of self-management components by people with Parkinson's and their carers. Methods MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched from inception to July 8, 2020, for qualitative research concerning self-management for people with Parkinson's. Data were coded and thematically synthesised using NVivo. Findings. Of 9547 search results, six papers were included in the final thematic synthesis. The studies reviewed consisted of 147 participants: 104 were people with Parkinson's and 43 were carers. Seven main themes were derived concerning self-management of people with Parkinson's: (1) medication management, (2) physical exercise, (3) self-monitoring techniques, (4) psychological strategies, (5) maintaining independence, (6) encouraging social engagement, and (7) providing knowledge and information. These components should be incorporated as relevant strategies and techniques and should be specific as well as tailored to different stages of the disease. Discussion. Self-management programmes for people with Parkinson's should include the seven themes presented as part of this review and pay particular attention to presenting relevant information and skills as they relate to different stages of the disease. Tailoring information and social engagement were two components that required specific attention in order to engage people with Parkinson's effectively.
Collapse
|
14
|
Structured Care and Self-Management Education for Persons with Parkinson's Disease: Why the First Does Not Go without the Second-Systematic Review, Experiences and Implementation Concepts from Sweden and Germany. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9092787. [PMID: 32872258 PMCID: PMC7563525 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Integrated care is regarded as a key for care delivery to persons with chronic long-term conditions such as Parkinson’s disease. For persons with Parkinson’s disease, obtaining self-management support is a top priority in the context of integrated care. Self-management is regarded as a crucial competence in chronic diseases since the affected persons and their caregivers inevitably take up the main responsibility when it comes to day-to-day management. Formal self-management education programs with the focus on behavioral skills relevant to the induction and maintenance of behavioral change have been implemented as a standard in many chronic long-term conditions. However, besides the example of the Swedish National Parkinson School, the offers for persons with Parkinson’s disease remain fragmented and limited in availability. Today, no such program is implemented as a nationwide standard in Germany. This paper provides (1) a systematic review on structured self-management education programs specifically designed or adopted for persons with Parkinson’s disease, (2) presents the Swedish National Parkinson School as an example for a successfully implemented nationwide program and (3) presents a concept for the design, evaluation and long-term implementation of a future-orientated self-management education program for persons with Parkinson’s disease in Germany.
Collapse
|