Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Effect of Exercise Rehabilitation in Patients With Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Exercise rehabilitation is conducive to increasing functional ability and improving health outcomes, but its effectiveness in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) is still controversial.

PURPOSE

In this study, our aim was to systematically examine the efficacy of exercise rehabilitation in people with AHF.

METHODS

A search was conducted for randomized controlled trial studies on exercise rehabilitation in patients with AHF up to November 2021. Two investigators conducted literature selection, quality assessments, and data extractions independently. The primary outcome was 6-minute walk distance, and the secondary outcomes were left ventricular ejection fraction, quality of life, Short Physical Performance Battery, readmission, and mortality. RevMan (version 5.3) software was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with 1215 participants were included. Exercise rehabilitation significantly improved the 6-minute walk distance (mean difference [MD], 33.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 31.37-34.70; P < .001; I2 = 0%), quality of life (MD, -11.57; 95% CI, -19.25 to -3.89; P = .003; I2 = 98%), Short Physical Performance Battery (MD, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.36-1.44; P < .001; I2 = 0%), and rate of readmission for any cause (risk ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.88; P = .02; I2 = 7%), compared with routine care. However, no statistically significant effects on left ventricular ejection fraction (MD, 0.94; 95% CI, -1.62 to 3.51; P = .47; I2 = 0%) and mortality (risk ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.64-1.80; P = .79; I2 = 0%) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with routine care, exercise rehabilitation improved functional ability and quality of life, reducing readmission in patients with AHF.

Investigating the effect of an online enhanced care program on the emotional and physical wellbeing of patients discharged from hospital with acute decompensated heart failure: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial: Enhanced care program for heart failure

Objective

Depression is highly prevalent and associated with increased hospitalisations and mortality among patients with heart failure (HF). This study will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an online wellbeing program for patients discharged from hospital with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in (i) improving emotional and physical wellbeing, and (ii) decreasing healthcare utilisation.

Methods

Two-arm randomised controlled trial. Eligible patients with ADHF will be recruited pre-discharge from two hospitals. Five hundred and seventy participants will be randomised to receive the intervention (online enhanced care program for HF: 'Enhanced HF Care') or usual care. Enhanced HF Care includes health education (11 micro-learning modules) and monitoring of depression and clinical outcomes via fortnightly/monthly surveys for 6 months, with participants offered tailored advice via video email and SMS. Cardiac nurses track real-time patient data from a dashboard and receive automated email alerts when patients report medium- or high-risk levels of depression or clinical symptoms, to action where needed. General practitioners also receive automated alerts if patients report medium- or high-risk survey responses and are encouraged to schedule a patient consultation.

Results

Sixty-five participants enrolled to-date. Co-primary outcomes ('Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire' Emotional and Physical subscales) and healthcare utilisation (secondary outcome) at 1- and 6-month post-recruitment will be compared between treatment arms using linear mixed effects regression models.

Conclusions

This study has the potential to reduce the burden of depression for patients with HF by prioritising urgent mental health needs and clinical symptoms while simultaneously empowering patients with self-care knowledge.

Trial registration

The trial was prospectively registered via the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12622001289707. Issue date: 4 October 2022.

Comprehensive and Safe Decongestion in Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Progressive intravascular, interstitial, and alveolar fluid overload underlies the transition from compensated to acutely decompensated heart failure and loop diuretics are the mainstay of treatment. Adverse effects and resistance to loop diuretics received much attention while the contribution of a depressed cardiac output to diuretic resistance was downplayed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Analysis of experience with positive inotropic agents, especially dobutamine, indicates that enhancement of cardiac output is not consistently associated with increased renal blood flow. However, urinary output and renal sodium excretion increase likely due to dobutamine-mediated decrease in renal and systemic reduced activation of sympathetic nervous- and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Mechanical circulatory support with left ventricular assist devices ascertained the contribution of low cardiac output to diuretic resistance and the pathogenesis and progression of kidney disease in acutely decompensated heart failure. Diuretic resistance commonly occurs in acutely decompensated heart failure. However, failure to resolve fluid overload despite high doses of loop diuretics should alert to the presence of a low cardiac output state.

Worsening of heart failure by coronavirus disease 2019 is associated with high mortality

AIMS

Patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) and concurrent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) might have a higher risk of severe events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively studied 16 patients with advanced HFrEF who developed COVID-19 between 1 March and 29 May 2020. Follow-up lasted until 30 September. Ten patients previously hospitalized with decompensated HFrEF were infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during hospitalization. Six patients undergoing ambulatory care at initiation of COVID-19 symptoms were hospitalized because of advanced HFrEF. All patients who experienced worsening of HFrEF due to COVID-19 required higher doses or introduction of additional inotropic drugs or intra-aortic balloon pump in the intensive care unit. The mean intravenous dobutamine dose before SARS-CoV-2 infection in previously hospitalized patients (n = 10) and the median (inter-quartile range) peak intravenous dobutamine dose during SARS-CoV-2 infection in all patients (n = 16) were 2 (0-7) μg/kg/min and 20 (14-20) (P < 0.001), respectively. During follow-up, 56% underwent heart transplantation (n = 2) or died (n = 7). Four patients died during hospitalization from mixed shock consequent to severe acute respiratory syndrome with inflammatory storm syndrome associated with septic and cardiogenic shock during COVID-19. After COVID-19 recovery, two patients died from mixed septic and cardiogenic shock and one from sustained ventricular tachycardia and cardiogenic shock. Five patients were discharged from hospital to ambulatory care. Four were awaiting heart transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Worsening of advanced HF by COVID-19 is associated with high mortality. This report highlights the importance of preventing COVID-19 in patients with advanced HF.

Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitors in the Failing Heart: a Growing Potential

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a new drug class designed to treat patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, cardiovascular outcome trials showed that SGLT2i also offer protection against heart failure (HF)-related events and cardiovascular mortality. These benefits appear to be independent of glycaemic control and have recently been demonstrated in the HF population with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), with or without T2D. This comprehensive, evidence-based review focuses on the published studies concerning HF outcomes with SGLT2i, discussing issues that may underlie the different results, along with the impact of these new drugs in clinical practice. The potential translational mechanisms behind SGLT2i cardio-renal benefits and the information that ongoing studies may add to the already existing body of evidence are also reviewed. Finally, we focus on practical management issues regarding SGLT2i use in association with other T2D and HFrEF common pharmacological therapies. Safety considerations are also highlighted. Considering the paradigm shift in T2D management, from a focus on glycaemic control to a broader approach on cardiovascular protection and event reduction, including the potential for wide SGLT2i implementation in HF patients, with or without T2D, we are facing a promising time for major changes in the global management of cardiovascular disease.

The midrange left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is associated with higher all-cause mortality during the 1-year follow-up compared to preserved LVEF among real-world patients with acute heart failure: a single-center propensity score-matched analysis

The objectives of the study were to characterize and compare different acute heart failure (AHF) subgroups according to left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in terms of all-cause mortality and HF-related readmissions during the 1-year follow-up (FU). Three hundred and fifty-six AHF patients admitted to Cardiology ward and/or CCU were retrospectively included in the study and analyzed during the 1-year FU. Patients were stratified according to LVEF as those with preserved (HFpEF), midrange (HFmrEF) and reduced LVEF (HFrEF). During the FU period, 148 (43.3%) patients died, and 116 HF-related readmission events were recorded. HFmrEF group had significantly higher standardized all-cause mortality rate, unadjusted for age, compared to HFpEF group and significantly lower than HFrEF group (41 vs. 18 and 41 vs. 62.5 events per 100 patient-years; χ² = 41.08, p < 0.001 and χ² = 16.62, p < 0.001, respectively). A propensity score-matched analysis in which all HF groups were matched for age and other covariates confirmed that HFmrEF group had significantly higher all-cause mortality rate than HFpEF group (χ² = 15.66, p < 0.001) while no significant differences in readmission rates were observed across all groups (p = NS). The hazard risk for a composite endpoint of death and readmission was highest in HFrEF group (HR 6.53, 95% CI 3.53-12.08, p < 0.001), followed by HFmrEF group (HR 3.30, 95% CI 1.86-5.87, p < 0.001) when compared to HFpEF group set as a reference. Among AHF patients, the HFmrEF phenotype was associated with significantly higher all-cause mortality compared to HFpEF, during the 1-year FU. This finding might implicate more stringent clinical approach towards this patient group.

Late In-Hospital Management of Patients Hospitalized with Acute Heart Failure

Acute Heart Failure (AHF) hospitalization presents a significant financial burden and portends a poor prognosis following discharge. As such, there has been significant emphasis on the late inpatient management of patients hospitalized with AHF to ensure successful transition to the outpatient setting and to reduce overall readmission and mortality rates. Thorough discharge planning and a multidisciplinary team approach are essential and as outlined in this review should focus on four key elements: the assessment of patients' readiness for discharge, optimization of goal directed medical therapy and appropriate device therapy, patient education and transition to the outpatient care.