Clinical guideline on adequacy and prescription of peritoneal dialysis

In recent years, the meaning of adequacy in peritoneal dialysis has changed. We have witnessed a transition from an exclusive achievement of specific objectives -namely solute clearances and ultrafiltration- to a more holistic approach more focused to on the quality of life of these patients. The purpose of this document is to provide recommendations, updated and oriented to social and health environment, for the adequacy and prescription of peritoneal dialysis. The document has been divided into three main sections: adequacy, residual kidney function and prescription of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis. Recently, a guide on the same topic has been published by a Committee of Experts of the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD 2020). In consideration of the contributions of the group of experts and the quasi-simultaneity of the two projects, references are made to this guide in the relevant sections. We have used a systematic methodology (GRADE), which specifies the level of evidence and the strength of the proposed suggestions and recommendations, facilitating future updates of the document.

Peritoneal equilibration testing: Your questions answered

The peritoneal equilibration test (PET), first described in 1987, is a semiquantitative assessment of peritoneal transfer characteristics in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. It is typically performed as a 4-h exchange using 2.27/2.5% dextrose dialysate with serial measurements of blood and dialysate creatinine, urea, and glucose concentrations. The percentage absorption of glucose and D/P creatinine ratio are used to determine peritoneal solute transfer rates. It is used to both help guide peritoneal dialysis prescriptions and to prognosticate. There are several derivative tests which have been described in the literature. In this review, we describe the original PET, the various iterations of the PET, the information gleaned, and the use in the setting of poor solute clearance and in the diagnosis of membrane dysfunction, and limitations of the PET.

30 Years of Peritoneal Dialysis Development: The past and the Future

A review is given of 30 years of development in peritoneal dialysis (PD). After a short description of the first 20 years, the main emphasis is put on the last 10 years. Subjects discussed are the increasing use of PD in high-risk populations, peritonitis and other catheter-related problems, adequacy of dialysis and nutrition, patient outcomes in comparison with hemodialysis, and peritoneal membrane changes with time on PD. Topics that have emerged during the last decade and the challenges for the next decennium are discussed. The great importance of quality assurance in fast-growing PD populations and of prevention of long-term membrane alterations are emphasized.

Independent Effects of Renal and Peritoneal Clearances on the Mortality of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Objective

Previous studies show that peritoneal Kt/V is an independent predictor of survival in anuric patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). We studied whether peritoneal Kt/V has the same effect in CAPD patients with residual renal function.

Design

Observational cohort study.

Setting

Single dialysis center in a university teaching hospital.

Patients

New and prevalent CAPD patients.

Methods

We examined the 5-year follow-up results of our prospective study previously reported ( Kidney Int 2000; 58:400–7). A total of 270 CAPD patients were followed for up to 6 years. Dialysis adequacy indices, residual renal function, and nutritional data were monitored.

Outcome Measures

Primary outcomes included mortality and technique failure. Peritoneal Kt/V rather than total Kt/V was used for multivariate survival analysis.

Results

Average duration of follow-up was 35.1 ± 22.0 months. Average peritoneal Kt/V throughout the study was 1.59 ± 0.37; median residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 0.82 mL/minute. Five-year actuarial patient survival was 41.5%, and technique survival was 23.1%. Multivariate analysis showed that sex, age, duration of dialysis, presence of diabetes, serum albumin, dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio at 24 hours, peritoneal Kt/V, residual GFR, and normalized protein nitrogen appearance were independent factors of both actuarial patient survival and technique survival. For every 0.1 unit higher peritoneal Kt/V, relative mortality risk was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89 – 0.99, p = 0.03). When prevalent and new CAPD cases were analyzed separately, peritoneal Kt/V predicted survival only for prevalent CAPD patients.

Conclusion

We conclude that, in prevalent CAPD patients with relatively low levels of peritoneal clearance and residual renal function, a higher peritoneal Kt/V is associated with better survival. Peritoneal clearance below 1.6 – 1.7 likely has a major detrimental effect on the clinical outcome of CAPD patients with little residual renal function.

The Influence of Demographic Factors and Modality on Loss of Residual Renal Function in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Objective

To determine whether gender, race, diabetes, peritoneal dialysis (PD) modality, and comorbid conditions influence loss of residual renal function (RRF).

Design

Retrospective study of incident PD patients, using database of prospectively collected demographic, laboratory, and clearance data.

Setting

Peritoneal Dialysis Registry of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Patients

The study included 184 continuous ambulatory PD and automated PD patients who had at least two 24-hour urine collections for glomerular filtration rate (GRF) between April 1991 and March 2000. 836 urine collections were analyzed.

Outcome Measures

Loss of RRF was defined as the slope of the decline in GFR as measured by the average of creatinine and urea clearances in 24-hour urine collections. Stepwise forward regression was used to identify demographic and laboratory factors associated with loss of GFR. Spearman correlations were used to assess the significance of associations.

Results

The median rate of decline of renal function was –0.17 mL/minute/month. Gender, race, diabetes, automated PD, peritoneal equilibration test, protein equivalent of nonprotein nitrogen appearance normalized to body surface area, and serum albumin did not predict loss of RRF. Cardiac disease was the only variable affecting decline of RRF ( p = 0.045).

Conclusion

Modality of PD and patient demographic factors do not contribute to the rate at which RRF is lost in incident PD patients. Additional study of the factors contributing to the decline and maintenance of RRF is needed.

Peritoneal Dialysis Clearance can Replace Residual Renal Function

Objective

There is controversy whether increasing peritoneal clearance effectively substitutes for declining residual renal function. We studied the impact of renal and peritoneal clearances on outcome, controlling for comorbidity.

Design

Registry database.

Settings

Four dialysis centers.

Patients

Incident peritoneal dialysis patients.

Methods

Data were collected prospectively on 90 incident patients between 1991 and 1999. At the end of their first year on peritoneal dialysis, patients were divided into groups based on the first year's clearance results: group 1 ( n = 62) had weekly Kt/V greater than or equal to 2.0 and creatinine clearance (CCr/1.73 m2) greater than or equal to 60 L throughout the first year; group 2 ( n = 28) fell below these targets due to loss of residual renal function and then reached targets due to prescription change.

Main Outcome Measures

Patient and technique survival.

Results

Both groups were similar in baseline characteristics except age (57 years vs 49 years, p = 0.02) and initial albumin (34.4 g/L vs 37.5 g/L, p = 0.001). One-year patient survival after grouping was similar in both groups (86.3% vs 80.9%, p = 0.72). Cox proportional hazard model, controlling for comorbidity, did not show “group” to be a significant predictor of outcome ( p = 0.96). One-year technique survival after grouping was similar in both groups (77.3% vs 83.2%, log rank p = 0.89). For technique failure, Cox proportional hazard model showed peritonitis ( p = 0.004) to be the only significant predictor of worse outcome.

Conclusions

Peritoneal dialysis patients with improved clearances due to prescription changes had survival comparable to patients who never fell below target. This suggests that loss of residual renal function may be replaced by increasing peritoneal dialysis clearance. A large multicenter trial to study this important question further is needed.

Risk Factors for Early Mortality in U.S. Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Impact of Residual Renal Function

Background

Potential risk factors for 1-year mortality, including the peritoneal component of dialysis dose, residual renal function, demographic data, hematocrit, serum albumin, dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio, and blood pressure, were examined in a national cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients randomly selected for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Core Indicators Project.

Methods

The study involved retrospective analysis of a cohort of 1219 patients receiving chronic peritoneal dialysis who were alive on December 31, 1996.

Results

During the 1-year follow-up period, 275 patients were censored and 200 non censored patients died. Among the 763 patients who had at least one calculable adequacy measure, the mean [± standard deviation (SD)] weekly Kt/V urea was 2.16 ± 0.61 and the mean weekly creatinine clearance was 66.1 ± 24.4 L/1.73 m2. Excluding the 365 patients who were anuric, the mean (±SD) urinary weekly Kt/V urea was 0.64 ± 0.52 (median: 0.51) and the mean (±SD) urinary weekly creatinine clearance was 31.0 ± 23.3 L/1.73 m2 (median: 26.3 L/1.73 m2). By Cox proportional hazard modeling, lower quartiles of renal Kt/V urea were predictive of 1-year mortality; lower quartiles of renal creatinine clearance were of borderline significance for predicting 1-year mortality. The dialysate component of neither the weekly creatinine clearance nor the weekly Kt/V urea were predictive of 1-year mortality. Other predictors of 1-year mortality ( p < 0.01) included lower serum albumin level, older age, and the presence of diabetes mellitus as the cause of ESRD, and, for the creatinine clearance model only, lower diastolic blood pressure.

Conclusion

Residual renal function is an important predictor of 1-year mortality in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients.

Adequacy Targets Can be Met in Anuric Patients by Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: Baseline Data from Eapos

♦ Objective

Conventional continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in patients without residual renal function and with high solute transport is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) has the potential to improve both solute clearance and ultrafiltration in these circumstances, but its efficacy as a treatment modality is unknown. The European Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes Study (EAPOS) is a 2-year, prospective, European multi-center study designed to determine APD feasibility and clinical outcomes in anuric patients. The present article describes the baseline data for patients recruited into the study.

♦ Design

All PD patients treated in the participating centers were screened for inclusion criteria [urinary output < 100 mL/24 h, or residual renal function (RRF) < 1 mL/min, or both]. After enrollment, changes were made to the dialysis prescription to achieve a weekly creatinine clearance above 60 L per 1.73 m2 and an ultrafiltration rate above 750 mL in 24 hours.

♦ Setting

The study is being conducted in 26 dialysis centers in 13 European countries.

♦ Baseline Data Collection

The information collected includes patient demographics, dialysis prescription, achieved weekly creatinine clearance, and 24-hour ultra-filtration (UF).

♦ Results

The study enrolled 177 anuric patients. Median dialysis duration before enrollment was 22.5 months (range: 0 – 285 months). Mean solute transport measured as the dialysate-to-plasma ratio of creatinine (D/PCr) was 0.74 ± 0.12. Patients received APD for a median of 9.0 hours overnight (range: 7 – 12 hours) using a median of 11.0 L of fluid (range: 6 – 28.75 L). Median daytime volume was 4.0 L (range: 0.0 – 9.0 L). Tidal dialysis was used in 26 patients, and icodextrin in 86 patients. At baseline, before treatment optimization, the weekly mean total creatinine clearance was 65.2 ± 14.4 L/1.73 m2, with 105 patients (60%) achieving the target of more than 60 L/1.73 m2. At baseline, 81% of patients with high transport, 69% with high-average transport, and 40% with low-average transport met the target. At baseline, 70% of patients with a body surface area (BSA) below 1.7 m2, 60% with a BSA of 1.7 – 2.0 m2, and 56% with a BSA above 2.0 m2 achieved 60 L/1.73 m2 weekly. Median UF was 1090 mL/24 h, and 75% of patients achieved the UF target of more than 750 mL/24 h.

♦ Conclusion

This baseline analysis of anuric patients recruited into the EAPOS study demonstrates that a high proportion of anuric patients on APD can achieve dialysis and ultrafiltration targets using a variety of regimes. This 2-year follow-up study aims to optimize APD prescription to reach predefined clearance and ultrafiltration targets, and to observe the resulting clinical outcomes.

Survival predictors in anuric patients on peritoneal dialysis: A prospective, multicenter, propensity score-matched cohort study

Prevalent anuric peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients usually have higher mortality than PD patients with residual urine volume. We aimed to evaluate the predictors of survival in anuric PD patients. Anuric PD patients (n = 505, <100 mL of daily urine) enrolled in Korean nationwide prospective cohort were analyzed. Survived and non-survived anuric PD patients were compared by propensity score matching analysis with a ratio of two to one. The propensity method was used to adjust for patient age, dialysis duration, and presence of diabetes. Among the total anuric PD patients, non-survived patients showed a significantly older age, higher incidence of diabetes, coronary artery disease, and arrhythmia, and lower serum creatinine and albumin. After propensity score matching, multivariate Cox regression analysis for patient survival showed a decreasing risk as serum albumin increased (HR = 0.347, p = 0.0094). Analysis using the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve showed that survival could be predicted with a sensitivity of 59.4% and a specificity of 63.2% using a cutoff value of 3.6 g/dL of serum albumin in unmatched total PD patients. The beneficial impact of high albumin level on death was significantly greater for patients with older age (≥50 years), no diabetes, low ultrafiltration (UF) volume (<1000 mL/day), and low levels of serum creatinine (<10 mg/dL), total cholesterol (<177.5 mg/dL), ferritin (<100 ng/mL), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) (<0.1 mg/dL). Survival in anuric PD patients was associated with age, comorbidities, and nutritional factors such as creatinine and albumin. After adjustment by propensity score matching, serum albumin level was an independent predictor for survival in anuric PD patients.

Should we look beyond Kt/V urea in assessing dialysis adequacy?

Since the advent of maintenance dialysis therapy, our interpretation of what adequate dialysis really is has broadened and become more controversial. This is not only due to our changing and aging dialysis population but also to our evolving knowledge base. As nephrologists, we strive to achieve both quality and (often) quantity of life for our patients and we feel reassured when we have a quantifiable marker to show for our efforts. However, we suggest that adequate dialysis reaches far beyond the realms of attaining a particular biochemical result. Dialysis adequacy should encompass a more comprehensive assessment of patient well-being. This metric could comprise quality of life and patient-specified goals, sufficient small solute and middle molecule clearance, optimal blood pressure control, and effective bone-mineral balance, all in the context of minimizing mortality and morbidity, and a livable dialysis regimen for the patient.

Peritoneal Equilibration Test and Patient Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although a peritoneal equilibration test yields data on three parameters (4-hour dialysate/plasma creatinine, 4- to 0-hour dialysate glucose, and 4-hour ultrafiltration volume), all studies have focused on the prognostic value of dialysate/plasma creatinine for patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Because dialysate 4- to 0-hour glucose and ultrafiltration volume may be superior in predicting daily ultrafiltration, the likely mechanism for the association of peritoneal equilibration test results with outcomes, we hypothesized that they are superior to dialysate/plasma creatinine for risk prediction.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We examined unadjusted and adjusted associations of three peritoneal equilibration test parameters with all-cause mortality, technique failure, and hospitalization rate in 10,142 patients on peritoneal dialysis treated between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2011 in 764 dialysis facilities operated by a single large dialysis organization in the United States, with a median follow-up period of 15.8 months; 87% were treated with automated peritoneal dialysis.

RESULTS

Demographic and clinical parameters explained only 8% of the variability in dialysate/plasma creatinine. There was a linear association between dialysate/plasma creatinine and mortality (adjusted hazards ratio per 0.1 unit higher, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.13) and hospitalization rate (adjusted incidence rate ratio per 0.1 unit higher, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.06). Dialysate/plasma creatinine and dialysate glucose were highly correlated (r=-0.84) and yielded similar risk prediction. Ultrafiltration volume was inversely related with hospitalization rate but not with all-cause mortality. None of the parameters were associated with technique failure. Adding 4- to 0-hour dialysate glucose, ultrafiltration volume, or both did not result in any improvement in risk prediction with dialysate/plasma creatinine alone.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis from a large contemporary cohort treated primarily with automated peritoneal dialysis validates dialysate/plasma creatinine as a robust predictor of outcomes in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis.

Influence of Different Payment Schemes on the Clinical Outcome in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

♦

BACKGROUND

Cost is always a big issue for dialysis patients. In the present study, we analyzed the effect of different payment schemes on dialysis adequacy and clinical outcome in our peritoneal dialysis program. ♦

METHODS

This is a single-center cohort study. A total of 175 patients who began dialysis from January 2006 to December 2007 were included. Baseline data, including volume status, dietary intake and nutrition status, dialysis adequacy, and sodium removal were collected at 6 months after peritoneal dialysis. Based on the different payment schemes, the patients were divided into 2 groups, higher payment group (GHP, 130 cases, with more than 85% reimbursement), and lower payment group (GLP, 45 cases, with less than 50% payment or totally self-paid). Patients were followed up until dropout or until December 31, 2013. ♦

RESULTS

At baseline, patients in the 2 groups had nearly the same residual renal function. But the GLP group patients dialyzed at a lower dose (4,516.91 ± 1,768.20 mL vs 6,058.17 ± 2,013.43 mL, p < 0.001). They had lower creatinine clearance (51.64 ± 24.23 L/w vs 70.54 ± 30.27 L/w, p < 0.001), sodium removal (2.23 ± 1.29 g vs 2.77 ± 1.29 g, p = 0.027), and fluid removal (970.33 ± 545.97 mL vs 1,146.66 ± 460.93 mL, p = 0.038). Normalized by height (in meters), the GLP group patients still had a lower normalized dialysis dose (2,890.61 ± 1084.44 mL/m vs 3,761.34 ± 1,237.10 mL/m, p < 0.001). Baseline nutritional and dietary parameters were comparable except that a lower daily protein intake (42.73 ± 10.99 g vs 47.26 ± 14.30 g, p = 0.032) and higher serum urea level (23.43 ± 6.88 mmol/L vs 19.84 ± 5.92 mmol/L, p < 0.001) were presented in the GLP group. There was no difference in volume status. During the follow-up, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was no significant difference in patient survival and technique survival. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, after adjusting for related factors, payment was again not a strong predictor of survival in the study population. ♦

CONCLUSION

Our study found that GLP group patients were adherent to lifestyle modification with lower dialysis doses, and they also had nearly the same long-term clinical outcome as the GHP group patients. Thus, lower dialysis doses combined with controlled dietary intake may be an effective approach to solve the dialysis problem for the low socio-economic status (SES) population.

Dialysis adequacy in Chinese anuric peritoneal dialysis patients

PURPOSE

We aimed in this study to explore how lower-protein diet would affect dialysis adequacy in anuric peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.

METHODS

Patients' demographic features were collected, namely age, gender, weight, height, underlying renal disease, and time on PD. Urea kinetic model was used to assess solute clearance. A consecutive 3-day dietary record was collected to evaluate dietary protein intake (DPI), and normalized protein nitrogen appearance (nPNA) was also calculated to reflect protein intake. Blood samples were collected to measure hemoglobin and biochemistry. Patient's nutritional status was assessed by biochemistry, handgrip strength, and subjective global assessment (SGA). Body fluid distribution was measured by body composition monitor.

RESULTS

Patients were 60.8 ± 14.92 years old, and the time on PD was 40.15 ± 22.90 months. Daily prescribed dialysis dose was 7,178 ± 1,326 mL. Kt/V was 1.6 ± 0.32. DPI was 0.8 ± 0.25 g/kg/day. nPNA was 0.9 ± 0.21 g/kg/day. Serum albumin was 39.42 ± 4.83 g/L. Prevalence of malnutrition (assessed by SGA) was 20.2 %. Serum phosphate and serum bicarbonate were 1.68 ± 0.47 and 27.16 ± 3.49 mmol/L, respectively. Systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were 123.4 ± 20.0 and 74.2 ± 12.6 mmHg, respectively. Patients with nPNA less than 0.6 had significantly lower serum albumin concentrations than the average, and patients with nPNA more than 1.2 g/kg/day had significantly higher levels of serum phosphate and serum urea than the average.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that anuric PD patients could achieve adequate dialysis even under lower solute clearance. And lower-protein diet contributed largely to adequate dialysis in these patients.

Relationship between glucose exposure via peritoneal dialysis solutions and coronary artery calcification in non-diabetic peritoneal dialysis patients

INTRODUCTION

Vascular calcification is frequent in dialysis patients and is associated with increased mortality. Impaired glucose metabolism is proposed as a contributing factor for vascular calcification. We investigated whether glucose exposure via dialysate may have a role in vascular calcification in non-diabetic peritoneal dialysis patients.

METHOD

We measured coronary artery calcification by multi-slice computerized tomography in 50 prevalent non-diabetic peritoneal dialysis patients and assessed its relations with fasting blood glucose, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and glucose exposure from peritoneal dialysis fluid.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (48%) had no coronary calcification. When patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of calcification, patients with calcification were mostly men and had higher burden of cardiovascular disease history, vitamin D dose intake, serum calcium, total glucose exposure from dialysis solution, and lower total weekly Kt/Vurea. In multivariate analysis, dialysate glucose exposure was an independent predictor of coronary artery calcification score, besides serum calcium and Kt/Vurea.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that high glucose exposure from dialysis solution, which is potentially correctable, is a risk factor for vascular calcification in non-diabetic PD patients.

Peritoneal Small Solute Clearance is Nonlinearly Related to Patient Survival in the Australian and New Zealand Peritoneal Dialysis Patient Populations

Background

The contribution of peritoneal small solute clearance per se to peritoneal dialysis (PD) patient outcomes remains uncertain. The aim of the present study was to determine whether baseline peritoneal small solute clearance predicted subsequent survival in Australian and New Zealand PD patients.

Methods

The study included all adult patients in Australia and New Zealand that commenced PD between 1 April 2002 and 31 December 2005 and had a peritoneal Kt/V (pKt/V) measurement performed within 6 months of PD commencement. Time to death and death-censored technique failure were examined by Kaplan–Meier analyses and both univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

pKt/V measurements were available in 2434 (63%) of the 3841 individuals that began PD treatment in Australia and New Zealand during the study period. These patients were divided into 4 groups according to their baseline pKt/V values: <1.45 ( n = 599), 1.45 – 1.69 ( n = 550), 1.70 – 2.00 ( n = 607), and >2.00 ( n = 678). Compared with the reference group (pKt/V 1.70 – 2.00), patient mortality was significantly increased in individuals with pKt/V <1.45 [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24 – 2.84; p = 0.003] and tended to be increased in those with pKt/V 1.45 – 1.69 (adjusted HR 1.46, 95% CI 0.96 – 2.21; p = 0.074). Importantly, higher pKt/V values (>2.00) also tended to be associated with higher mortality (adjusted HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.96 – 2.11; p = 0.079). The other independent predictors of death were lower residual renal function (RRF), older age, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, late referral, higher peritoneal permeability, and untreated hypertension. No interaction was observed between pKt/V, RRF, and survival. Death-censored technique failure was demonstrated to be significantly worse in the pKt/V 1.45 – 1.69 group (adjusted HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.03 – 1.79; p = 0.028), older individuals, and individuals with Asian racial origin.

Conclusions

Initial peritoneal Kt/V significantly and independently influences patient survival in Australian and New Zealand PD patients. Overall survival appears to be optimal in the pKt/V range 1.70 – 2.00, with poorer outcomes observed above and below these values. In particular, survival is significantly worse when the achieved pKt/V is <1.45. In addition, RRF is an important independent predictor of patient survival in the Australian and New Zealand incident PD patient populations. The results of this study should therefore draw attention to the possible danger of not delivering adequate PD dose to patients with considerable RRF.

Association of Kt/V and creatinine clearance with outcomes in anuric peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

The 2006 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative recommended a minimum total Kt/V of 1.7, eliminated creatinine clearance (Ccr) as a target, and recommended the use of ideal body weight to calculate Kt/V. We assessed these recommendations as predictors of outcomes in anuric peritoneal dialysis patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study using administrative data.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

1,432 peritoneal dialysis patients with anuria from January 1, 1994, to January 31, 2005, in a national sample (1,428 with Kt/V, 1,416 with Ccr).

PREDICTORS

Kt/V and Ccr at anuria; Kt/V based on actual body weight and ideal body weight.

OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS

Association of dialysis adequacy with mortality and time to first hospitalization after anuria assessed by using accelerated failure time models.

RESULTS

293 anuric patients had Kt/V less than 1.7, 366 had Kt/V of 1.7 to 2.0, and 769 had Kt/V greater than 2.0, using actual body weight for calculation. In unadjusted analyses, Kt/V calculated using actual body weight both less than 1.7 (-41.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -55.5 to -22.6) and 1.7 to 2.0 (-26.1%; 95% CI, -42.6 to -4.6) were associated with shorter time to mortality. Kt/V calculated using actual body weight less than 1.7 was associated with shorter time to hospitalization (-38.1%; 95% CI, -50.0 to -23.4), but Kt/V calculated using actual body weight of 1.7 to 2.0 was not a significant predictor (-3.3%; 95% CI, -21.1 to 18.6). After adjustment, Kt/V calculated using actual body weight less than 1.7 remained associated with mortality (-25.3%; 95% CI, -41.1 to -4.8) and hospitalization (-33.4%; 95% CI, -47.1 to -16.0). Ccr did not predict mortality. In unadjusted analysis, Ccr was not associated with hospitalization, but after adjustment, Ccr less than 50 L/wk/1.73 m(2) was significantly associated with shorter time to hospitalization (-19.9%; 95% CI, -35.0 to -1.3). Kt/V using ideal body weight was not a significant predictor in adjusted models.

LIMITATIONS

This study was nonrandomized, with few malnourished patients. In addition, there is a potential for informative censoring for transfer to hemodialysis therapy before anuria.

CONCLUSIONS

Kt/V calculated using actual body weight less than 1.7 in anuric peritoneal dialysis patients is associated with increased mortality and hospitalization. Use of ideal body weight to calculate Kt/V weakened the associations with outcomes and therefore cannot be recommended.

Nocturnal ultrafiltration profiles in patients on APD: impact on fluid and solute transport

In order to prevent morbidity and mortality in peritoneal dialysis (PD), sodium and water balance as well as a minimal level of small-solute clearances are needed. The impact of three nocturnal peritoneal ultrafiltration (UF) profiles on UF and small solute clearance in patients on automated PD (APD) was studied: constant glucose concentration of 1.36% (flat) or modifying the glucose concentration of the heater bag (descendant: 3.86-1.36%; ascendant: 1.36-3.86%). Sixty-two patients were enrolled in the study and received each profile within a four-month period, thus serving as their own controls. UF was lower with the flat profile (367+/-420ml; P<0.01), but no difference was seen between the two higher glucose concentration profiles. Peritoneal Kt/V (pKt/V) and peritoneal creatinine clearance (CrpC) showed statistically higher values from the descendant vs ascendant vs flat profiles (pKt/V: 1.54+/-0.30 vs 1.45+/-0.30 vs 1.38+/-0.27, and CrpC: 36.9+/-7.9 vs 33.5+/-7.48 vs 29.92+/-7.5 mlmin(-1)). Multivariate analysis showed statistical significance for the following: in the intrasubject comparisons, the profile for pKt/V (F=9.109, P<0.001) and CrpC (F=11.697, P<0.001), and in the intersubjects comparisons, the effects of both gender (F=14.334, P<0.01) for pKt/V and peritoneal permeability for both parameters (pKt/V: F=4.37, P<0.05; CrpC: F=11.697, P<0.001). In conclusion, the application of ascendant and descendant UF profiles in automated PD is feasible and results in better UF and small solute clearances, thus preventing inadequate dialysis and volume overload..

Meta-Analysis: Peritoneal Membrane Transport, Mortality, and Technique Failure in Peritoneal Dialysis

Peritoneal membrane solute transport in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients is assessed by the peritoneal equilibration test, which measures the ratio of creatinine in the dialysate to plasma after a standardized 4-h dwell (D/Pc). Patients then are classified as high, high-average, low-average, or low transporters on the basis of this result. A meta-analysis of observational studies was carried out to characterize the relationship between D/Pc and mortality and technique failure in patients who are on PD. Citations were identified in Medline by using a combination of Medical Subject Heading search terms and key words related to PD, peritoneal membrane permeability/transport, and mortality and technique failure. The table of contents of relevant journals and bibliographies of relevant citations were reviewed in duplicate. Twenty studies that met study criteria were identified. Nineteen studies were pooled to generate a summary mortality relative risk of 1.15 for every 0.1 increase in the D/Pc (95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.23; P < 001). This result equated to an increased mortality risk of 21.9, 45.7, and 77.3% in low-average, high-average, and high transporters, respectively, as compared with patients with low transport status. Meta-regression analysis showed that the proportion of patients who were on continuous cycler PD within a study was inversely proportional to the mortality risk (P = 0.05). The pooled summary relative risk for death-censored technique failure was 1.18 (95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.46; P = 0.12) for every 0.1 increase in the D/Pc. This meta-analysis demonstrates that a higher peritoneal membrane solute transport rate is associated with a higher mortality risk and a trend to higher technique failure.

Rethinking the peritoneal dialysis prescription: Results of recent studies (Review Article)

Peritoneal dialysis treats uraemia in a way different from hemodialysis. The continuous nature of peritoneal dialysis optimises the removal of uraemic toxins of larger molecular weight, the so-called 'middle molecules'. Initially, there was an appreciation of the efficacy of this kind of slow, continuous dialysis. However, with the growing emphasis on adequacy as defined by small solute kinetics, blood purification by peritoneal dialysis was considered to be inferior to that performed with hemodialysis. With the subsequent publication of studies showing a lack of correlation of small solute clearance parameters with outcome in peritoneal dialysis, attention is again being paid to the benefits of continuous dialysis that treats renal failure in a way not quantifiable by small solute kinetics.

Predictors of survival in anuric peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a much more important determinant of survival in peritoneal dialysis patients, than peritoneal solute clearances. However, anuric peritoneal dialysis patients are solely dependent on peritoneal solute clearances. The aim of the study was to analyze the effects of peritoneal small solute clearances and ultrafiltration on survival in anuric patients, and to establish the minimum levels of small solute clearances and net ultrafiltration. These objectives were investigated in a prospective cohort study in incident peritoneal dialysis patients who had become anuric during follow-up.

METHODS

The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD) is a prospective multicenter cohort study in which new adult dialysis patients are included and followed during 6 months intervals. Included were 542 peritoneal dialysis patients. Of these, 166 developed anuria, 130 of which could be included in the study.

RESULTS

Two-year patient survival after the outset of anuria was 67%, technique survival 73%, and the combined 2-year patient and technique survival was 50%. Risk factors associated with mortality were age, comorbidity, the duration of peritoneal dialysis before anuria, and a low serum albumin. Peritoneal solute clearances were analyzed time-dependently. These parameters were not associated with survival when analyzed as continuous variables and also not when the analyses were done in quintiles, although the time-dependent approach was almost significant for Kt/V(urea). On the other hand, when the results were analyzed dichotomously using predefined cutoff points, Kt/V(urea) <1.5 per week and creatinine clearance <40 L/week/1.73 m2 were associated with an increase in the relative risk of death. Also peritoneal ultrafiltration was significantly associated with survival.

CONCLUSION

The survival of anuric peritoneal dialysis patients is in line with expectations based on the duration of dialysis. The risk factors for death are the same as in the dialysis population as a whole. Besides an association with ultrafiltration, our study enabled us to define the lower limits of adequate peritoneal dialysis, that is Kt/V(urea) <1.5 per week and creatinine clearance <40 L/week/1.73 m2.

Minimal and optimal peritoneal Kt/V targets: results of an anuric peritoneal dialysis patient's survival analysis

BACKGROUND

Residual renal clearance has been shown to be much more predictive of survival than peritoneal clearance. There has been little data to support a target level of peritoneal clearance. A retrospective study was therefore conducted to see how the peritoneal Kt/V had affected the survival of anuric patients in our center.

METHODS

Over a period of 10 years, there were 150 peritoneal dialysis patients with documented anuria. Their survival was analyzed according to their baseline peritoneal Kt/V at the time of documentation of anuria and at the time of their latest altered peritoneal dialysis (PD) prescription (subsequent Kt/V).

RESULTS

There were 90 females and 42 diabetics. The mean age and duration of dialysis were 57.7 +/- 14.7 and 44.1 +/- 31.3 months, respectively. The 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 88.7% and 66.7%, respectively. We found that patients with baseline peritoneal Kt/V below 1.67 had poorer survival after the documentation of anuria than those above [relative risk (RR) 1.985, P= 0.01], although the baseline Kt/V was not an independent risk factors in the whole group of patients. However, such effect was mainly observed in female patients. The survival was identical between those with Kt/V above or below 1.80 (P= 0.98). Among female patients, the group with baseline Kt/V 1.67 to 1.86 had the best survival, followed by those greater than 1.86 and lowest in those below 1.67 (P= 0.0016). For patients with baseline Kt/V below 1.80, those with subsequent Kt/V above 1.76 had better survival than those below (P= 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggested that a negative effect of peritoneal Kt/V on survival is apparent at a level below 1.67 and there exists a limit of its effect at around 1.80. We suggested a minimal Kt/V target of 1.70 and an optimal target at 1.80 in anuric patients based on survival data. Prospective randomized study is required to confirm this finding.

Important differentiation of factors that predict outcome in peritoneal dialysis patients with different degrees of residual renal function

BACKGROUND

Residual renal function (RRF) is an important predictor of outcome in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Whether results from survival studies in dialysis patients with RRF can also be extrapolated to anuric patients remains uncertain. In this observational study, we examined the characteristics of PD patients with a residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > or =1 ml/min per 1.73 m2 vs those with complete anuria and differentiated factors that predict outcome in the two groups of patients.

METHODS

Two hundred and forty-six continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients (39% being completely anuric) were recruited from a single regional dialysis centre. Assessments of haemodynamic, echocardiographic, nutritional and biochemical parameters and indices of dialysis adequacy were done at study baseline and were related to outcomes.

RESULTS

During the prospective follow-up of 30.8+/-13.8 (mean+/-SD) months, 28.0% of patients with residual GFR > or =1 ml/min per 1.73 m2 vs 50.5% of anuric patients had died (P = 0.005). The overall 2 year patient survival was 89.7 and 65.0% for patients with GFR > or =1 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and anuric patients, respectively (P = 0.0012). Compared with patients with GFR > or =1 ml/min per 1.73 m2, anuric patients were dialysed for longer (P<0.001), were more anaemic (P<0.005), and had higher calcium-phosphorus product (P<0.01), higher C-reactive protein (P<0.001), lower serum albumin (P<0.05), greater prevalence of malnutrition according to subjective global assessment (P<0.05) and more severe cardiac hypertrophy (P<0.001) at baseline. Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, serum albumin, left ventricular mass index and residual GFR were significant factors associated with mortality in patients with GFR > or =1 ml/min per 1.73 m2, while increasing age, atherosclerotic vascular disease and higher C-reactive protein were associated with greater mortality in anuric PD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates more adverse cardiovascular, inflammatory, nutritional and metabolic profiles as well as higher mortality in anuric PD patients. Furthermore, factors associated with mortality are also not equivalent for PD patients with and without RRF, suggesting that patients with and without RRF are qualitatively different.

Survival of functionally anuric patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: the European APD Outcome Study

The European APD Outcome Study (EAPOS) is a 2-yr, prospective, multicenter study of the feasibility and clinical outcomes of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) in anuric patients. A total of 177 patients were enrolled with a median age of 54 yr (range, 21 to 91 yr). Previous median total time on dialysis was 38 mo (range, 1.6 to 259 mo), and 36% of patients had previously been on hemodialysis for >90 d. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease were present in 17% and 46% of patients, respectively. The APD prescription was adjusted at physician discretion to aim for creatinine clearance (Ccrea) >/=60 L/wk per 1.73 m(2) and ultrafiltration (UF) >/=750 ml/24 h during the first 6 mo. Baseline solute transport status (D/P) was determined by peritoneal equilibration test. At 1 yr, 78% and 74% achieved Ccrea and UF targets, respectively; median drained dialysate volume was 16.2 L/24 h with 50% of patients using icodextrin. Baseline D/P was not related to UF achieved at 1 yr. At 2 yr, patient survival was 78% and technique survival was 62%. Baseline predictors of poor survival were age (>65 yr; P = 0.006), nutritional status (Subjective Global Assessment grade C; P = 0.009), diabetic status (P = 0.008), and UF (<750 ml/24 h; P = 0.047). Time-averaged analyses showed that age, Subjective Global Assessment grade C and diabetic status predicted patient survival with UF the next most significant variable (risk ratio, 0.5/L per d; P = 0.097). Baseline Ccrea, time-averaged Ccrea, and baseline D/P had no effect on patient or technique survival. This study shows that anuric patients can successfully use APD. Baseline UF, not Ccrea or membrane permeability, is associated with patient survival.

Are peritoneal dialysis patients with and without residual renal function equivalent for survival study? Insight from a retrospective review of the cause of death

BACKGROUND

It remains unknown whether results of survival studies in anuric patients can be extrapolated to those who still have significant urine output. It is possible that after a prolonged period on dialysis, anuric patients are qualitatively different from patients with residual renal function.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review to study the cause of death of 296 peritoneal dialysis patients of our centre over a 7 year period, and compared the mortality and distribution of cause of death between patients with and without residual renal function.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-two cases (48.0%) died of vascular diseases, 82 cases (27.7%) died of infections and 72 cases (24.3%) died of other causes. Anuric patients had a higher overall mortality rate than non-anuric patients (14.9 vs 9.9%, P=0.0005), and the difference was almost completely attributed to the difference in mortality from vascular diseases (8.0 vs 4.1%, P<0.0001). Vascular disease was a more common cause of death in anuric patients than those with residual renal function (55.3 vs 40.8%, P=0.011). The difference was largely explained by the higher prevalence of sudden cardiac death in anuric patients (39 in 149 vs 19 in 147 cases). Patients without pre-existing cardiovascular disease more commonly died of vascular disease after they became anuric (47.4 vs 34.0%, P=0.017). The difference could not be explained by the longer duration of dialysis in anuric patients because there was no significant change in the distribution of cause of death with time on dialysis (chi-square test, P=0.341).

CONCLUSIONS

Our observation suggests that peritoneal dialysis patients with and without residual renal function are qualitatively different. Studies on peritoneal dialysis adequacy and survival in anuric patients should only be extrapolated to the general dialysis population with caution.

The ADEMEX study and its implications for peritoneal dialysis adequacy

In an attempt to improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD), national organizations (such as the National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative [NKF-DOQI] process) have formulated clinical practice guidelines based on clinical evidence available at the time of development. For "adequacy" of PD it was acknowledged that there was no prospective randomized interventional clinical trial that evaluated the effect of an increase in peritoneal clearance on outcome. The ADEMEX study is the first such study designed to do this. It was well done and adequately powered for the primary analysis. The study findings indicate that over the range of solute clearances studied, an increase in peritoneal clearance is not associated with an incremental improvement in patient outcome. However, it is noted that the cause of dropout was different between groups, with more dropout for "uremia" in the control group. There are also some limitations in the generalizability of the results. First, the exclusion criteria were likely to exclude patients who were small in body size or were high transporters, patients with the highest relative risk of death. Second, although there was an increase in small solute clearance between control and intervention groups, there was not likely to be an increase in clearance of other potential uremic solutes such as middle molecules. Third, the study did not examine outcomes for patients on cycler therapy. Nevertheless it was a provocative, well-run clinical study which does have implications for clinical practice. It confirms that one prescription does not fit all patients, that many patients below current NKF-DOQI targets for small solute clearance are likely to be adequately dialyzed, and provides evidence-based clinical information for national societies to consider when preparing for the next revision of their guidelines.

The future of APD

The future of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) greatly depends on its ability to provide optimal clearances and volume control, preserve peritoneal transport, maintain adequate peritoneal access, and offer flexibility of prescription at a reasonable and competitive cost. Each of these aspects are discussed in the light of recent technologic advances and clinical experiences in order to project a vision of the potential future of APD.

Peritoneal dialysis in anuric patients: concerns and cautions

Most recent studies have found an equivalent survival for patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD); evidence even suggests that PD might be the preferred modality during the first 3-4 years of renal replacement therapy. This is probably related to the continuous and minimally invasive character of PD as compared to HD, resulting in better preservation of residual renal function (RRF) and less cardiovascular strain. On the other hand, blood pressure control, fluid balance, and adequacy targets may be difficult to obtain in long-term PD patients. The question arises whether PD is a feasible option in anuric patients. It is clear that the answer depends on the body size and the peritoneal membrane transport characteristics of the patient, so that PD will be feasible in some anuric patients, whereas in others it will not be. Evaluation of the peritoneal transport characteristics and adaptation of the PD prescription is warranted. A constant evaluation of the fluid balance, nutritional, and cardiovascular status is needed. This article reviews the physiologic insights and clinical evidence necessary for a good PD prescription in anuric patients.

Effects of increased peritoneal clearances on mortality rates in peritoneal dialysis: ADEMEX, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Small-solute clearance targets for peritoneal dialysis (PD) have been based on the tacit assumption that peritoneal and renal clearances are equivalent and therefore additive. Although several studies have established that patient survival is directly correlated with renal clearances, there have been no randomized, controlled, interventional trials examining the effects of increases in peritoneal small-solute clearances on patient survival. A prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial was performed to study the effects of increased peritoneal small-solute clearances on clinical outcomes among patients with end-stage renal disease who were being treated with PD. A total of 965 subjects were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group (in a 1:1 ratio). Subjects in the control group continued to receive their preexisting PD prescriptions, which consisted of four daily exchanges with 2 L of standard PD solution. The subjects in the intervention group were treated with a modified prescription, to achieve a peritoneal creatinine clearance (pCrCl) of 60 L/wk per 1.73 m(2). The primary endpoint was death. The minimal follow-up period was 2 yr. The study groups were similar with respect to demographic characteristics, causes of renal disease, prevalence of coexisting conditions, residual renal function, peritoneal clearances before intervention, hematocrit values, and multiple indicators of nutritional status. In the control group, peritoneal creatinine clearance (pCrCl) and peritoneal urea clearance (Kt/V) values remained constant for the duration of the study. In the intervention group, pCrCl and peritoneal Kt/V values predictably increased and remained separated from the values for the control group for the entire duration of the study (P < 0.01). Patient survival was similar for the control and intervention groups in an intent-to-treat analysis, with a relative risk of death (intervention/control) of 1.00 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.80 to 1.24]. Overall, the control group exhibited a 1-yr survival of 85.5% (CI, 82.2 to 88.7%) and a 2-yr survival of 68.3% (CI, 64.2 to 72.9%). Similarly, the intervention group exhibited a 1-yr survival of 83.9% (CI, 80.6 to 87.2%) and a 2-yr survival of 69.3% (CI, 65.1 to 73.6%). An as-treated analysis revealed similar results (overall relative risk = 0.93; CI, 0.71 to 1.22; P = 0.6121). Mortality rates for the two groups remained similar even after adjustment for factors known to be associated with survival for patients undergoing PD (e.g., age, diabetes mellitus, serum albumin levels, normalized protein equivalent of total nitrogen appearance, and anuria). This study provides evidence that increases in peritoneal small-solute clearances within the range studied have a neutral effect on patient survival, even when the groups are stratified according to a variety of factors (age, diabetes mellitus, serum albumin levels, normalized protein equivalent of total nitrogen appearance, and anuria) known to affect survival. No clear survival advantage was obtained with increases in peritoneal small-solute clearances within the range achieved in this study.

Peritoneal dialysis adequacy and risk of death

The debate on the relationship between small solute clearance and patient outcome on peritoneal dialysis has intensified in the past year with the publication or presentation of a number of important new studies. Previous studies had found a correlation between clearances and subsequent patient survival. However, this effect was all accounted for by residual renal clearance. The failure to detect an independent effect of peritoneal clearance on outcomes had been attributed to a lack of well-done studies with sufficient variation in peritoneal clearance to detect such an effect. New prospective and randomized studies suggest, however, that the relationship between peritoneal clearance and outcome is weak or absent within the usual dose ranges delivered in clinical practice. Existing clearance targets may need to be reviewed.

Relative contribution of residual renal function and peritoneal clearance to adequacy of dialysis: a reanalysis of the CANUSA study

Studies of the adequacy of peritoneal dialysis and recommendations have assumed that renal and peritoneal clearances are comparable and therefore additive. The CANUSA data were reanalyzed in an effort to address this assumption. Among the 680 patients in the original CANUSA study, 601 had all of the variables of interest for this report. Adequacy of dialysis was estimated from GFR (mean of renal urea and creatinine clearance) and from peritoneal creatinine clearance. The Cox proportional-hazards model was used to evaluate the time-dependent association of these independent variables with patient survival. For each 5 L/wk per 1.73 m(2) increment in GFR, there was a 12% decrease in the relative risk (RR) of death (RR, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 0.94) but no association with peritoneal creatinine clearance (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.10). Estimates of fluid removal (24-h urine volume, net peritoneal ultrafiltration, and total fluid removal) then were added to the Cox model. For a 250-ml increment in urine volume, there was a 36% decrease in the RR of death (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.80). The association of patient survival with GFR disappeared (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.04). However, neither net peritoneal ultrafiltration nor total fluid removal was associated with patient survival. Although these results may be explained partly, statistically, by less variability in peritoneal clearance than in GFR, the latter seems to be physiologically more important than the former. The assumption of equivalence of peritoneal and renal clearances is not supported by these data. Recommendations for adequate peritoneal dialysis need to be reevaluated in light of these observations.

Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis

The National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiatives guidelines have standardized many aspects of treating end-stage renal disease patients with peritoneal dialysis in an attempt to improve overall patient outcome. While recommending certain total solute clearance goals, the guidelines have also pointed out deficiencies in our knowledge base and precipitated many controversies. Some of these controversies have been resolved while others may have been interpreted wrongly, unnecessarily resulting in transfer of patients from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis due to "failure to meet adequacy targets" even when doing well clinically. This report reviews the rationale for the original guidelines and their subsequent modification. It also outlines a rational approach toward prescription modification based on peritoneal physiology. Specific solute clearance target goals discussed are the modifications for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and cycler peritoneal dialysis (CCPD), and a review of what solute clearance targets subsequent guidelines from other countries have used. Some examples are as follows: new guidelines suggest that solute clearance goals for creatine clearance should differ for low and low-average transporters than for high and high-average transporters (weekly clearance of 50 and 60 1/1.73 m(2), respectively) while Kt/V targets remain unchanged. Also discussed is the rationale for having the same target for patients on CCPD with a mid-day exchange as those for patients on CAPD. We are also reminded that solute clearance is only one aspect of "adequate" dialysis-blood pressure and volume control are equally important, and ways to maintain euvolemia and blood pressure control are discussed in the context of prescription management.