Associations between diabetes and sex with peritoneal dialysis technique and patient survival: Results from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry cohort study

Peritoneal dialysis in Herzegovina, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina: 18 years of experience from our center

INTRODUCTION

Due to treatment of end-stage-renal-disease (ESRD), continuous peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is used in 11% of cases and is associated with several PD-associated infections.

METHODS

Clinical data on 71 patients with CAPD were evaluated in addition to exit site infections and episodes of acute peritonitis (AP).

RESULTS

There were 39 men and 32 women. Average age was 61 years when we began CAPD and average time spent on CAPD program was 3.35 years. Illness that dominantly caused ESRD was diabetes (23 patients). Exit site infection was mostly caused by S epidermidis-MRSE and AP was most commonly caused by Staphylococcus sp. group. Most common cause of death was cardiovascular disease. At the end of this study, 9 patients were alive and still on CAPD, 10 were transplanted, 15 switched to HD and 36 died.

CONCLUSION

Optimal prevention measures and treatment of infectious complications in CAPD is necessary for better treatment possibilities.

Peritoneal Dialysis Care for People with Diabetes, Polycystic Kidney Disease, or Advanced Liver Disease

People treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) often have complicating conditions that require careful management. Three such conditions are reviewed in this article-diabetes mellitus, polycystic kidney disease, and chronic liver disease. Each of these conditions requires an understanding of both its effect on the delivery of the PD and the effect of the PD on the condition itself. In diabetes, glucose absorption from the dialysate complicates metabolic control and affects salt and water management and patient outcome. There is particular benefit in clinical care being delivered through a multidisciplinary team that involves both kidney and diabetes experts. In relation to polycystic kidney disease, a key issue is the potential for increased intraperitoneal pressure due to the combined effect of the enlarged polycystic organs and the presence of the dialysis solution, and therefore, the PD prescription requires to be managed with a particular focus on limiting that pressure. For patients with liver disease, key issues include nutritional support because PD can add to protein losses already consequent on the liver disease itself. Considered approaches are required to manage ascites and reduce infection risk and the potential for hernias and leaks to develop. Mortality in this group is unfortunately high-however, PD may present a better management option than hemodialysis in many patients-particularly in those where the liver disease is complicated by low BP, clotting abnormalities, or troublesome ascites. Overall, the choice to use PD in patients with these complicating conditions should be based on shared decision making with the patient and their family members informed by high-quality information in which risks, benefits, and management strategies are clearly presented.

Why do we keep ignoring sex in kidney disease?

Throughout the history of nephrology, little attention has been paid to the sex and gender differences in kidney disease. This lack of awareness prevents optimal diagnosis and management of kidney disease. In today's world of precision medicine, it is imperative to appreciate the differential factors regarding gender and kidney disease. This editorial summarizes the up-to-date literature regarding sex and gender differences in kidney disease and considers areas where knowledge is incomplete and where further research is needed. We address sex-specific effects on chronic kidney disease epidemiology; risks of dialysis underdosing and medication overdosing in women; unexplained loss of female sex advantage in life expectancy during dialysis, and impact of sex on diagnosis and management of genetic kidney disease. We also aim to highlight the impact of gender on kidney health and raise awareness of disparities that may be faced by women, and transgender and gender-diverse persons when a male-model approach is used by healthcare systems. By understanding the link between sex and kidney disease, kidney specialists can improve the care and outcomes of their patients. In addition, research on this topic can inform the development of targeted prevention and intervention strategies that address the specific needs and risk factors of different populations.

Clinical risk factors for peritoneal dialysis withdrawal at different dialysis duration

BACKGROUND

The duration of patients maintained on peritoneal dialysis (PD) varied. This study investigated the clinical risk factors for PD withdrawal at different dialysis duration.

METHODS

Patients who initiated PD from 1994 to 2011 were recruited and followed for at least 10 years until 2021. Patients were grouped into four groups according to dialysis duration or time on treatment (TOT) when withdrew PD.

RESULTS

A cohort of 586 patients were enrolled (mean age of 54.9 years, median dialysis duration or TOT of 47.9 months). Patients who maintained PD for longer than 10 years were younger, with lower prevalence of diabetes, lower serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level and white blood cell (WBC) count, higher serum albumin and pre-albumin level, higher normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) and residual kidney function, and more common use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) at baseline (p < 0.05 for all). Peritonitis related death and ultrafiltration failure related HD transferring increased along with time on PD (p < 0.001). Old age, diabetes, low serum albumin, high WBC count, hypertensive nephropathy, and nonuse of RASi were associated with increased risk of non-transplantation related PD withdrawal (p < 0.05 for all). Low baseline CRP and use of RASi were independent predictors for long-term PD maintenance (p < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term PD patients demonstrated young age, low prevalence of diabetes, better nutrition status, absence of inflammation, better residual kidney function, and higher proportion of RASi usage at baseline. Absence of inflammation and use of RASi were independently associated with long-term PD maintenance.

Visit-to-visit HbA1c variability is associated with poor prognosis in peritoneal dialysis patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of diabetic peritoneal dialysis patients is poor. HbA1c serves as a crucial indicator for monitoring blood glucose control in patients with diabetes. Nevertheless, the relationship between visit-to-visit HbA1c variability and prognosis in peritoneal dialysis with diabetes remains unclear.

METHODS

All participants were categorized into 3 groups based on the HbA1c variability score (HVS), which is the frequency of 0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) alter in visit-to-visit HbA1c values. Then, the hazard ratio to HVS with all-cause mortality was analyzed using the Cox hazard model, followed by the Fine-Gray competing risk model for major adverse cardiovascular events. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis were conducted to ascertain the robustness of the findings.

RESULTS

Eight hundred twenty patients with type 2 diabetes were finally enrolled in this study from 2,855 participants with a mean age of 56.9 ± 14.6 years and a median follow-up time of 44 months [IQR: 27-70], death occurred in 496 (60.2%) individuals. Compared with the lowest category (HVS < 1/3) after being adjusted by potential confounding factors, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 4.59 (3.74-5.64) and the sub-distribution hazard ratio for major adverse cardiovascular events was 1.91 (1.46-2.51) of the highest category (HVS ≥ 2/3). Subgroup interaction and sensitivity analysis, including the adjustment for variables such as time-weighted average HbA1c, HbA1c measurement times and expansion, confirmed the reliability of the results.

CONCLUSION

The HVS is related to the risk of poor prognosis in peritoneal dialysis with type 2 diabetes mellitus, independently of clinical multiple variables, and is a novel indicator with clinical guidance.

Narrative Review of glycaemic management in people with diabetes on peritoneal dialysis

There is an increasing number of people with diabetes on peritoneal dialysis (PD) worldwide. However, there is a lack of guidelines and clinical recommendations for managing glucose control in people with diabetes on PD. The aim of this review is to provide a summary of the relevant literature and highlight key clinical considerations with practical aspects in the management of diabetes in people undergoing PD. A formal systematic review was not conducted because of the lack of sufficient and suitable clinical studies. A literature search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, Central, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov., from 1980 through February 2022. The search was limited to publications in English. This narrative review and related guidance have been developed jointly by diabetologists and nephrologists, who reviewed all available current global evidence regarding the management of diabetes in people on PD.We focus on the importance of individualized care for people with diabetes on PD, the burden of hypoglycemia, glycemic variability in the context of PD and treatment choices for optimizing glucose control. In this review, we have summarized the clinical considerations to guide and inform clinicians providing care for people with diabetes on PD.

Peritoneal dialysis in Dalmatian County, Croatia: 21 years of a single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

With end-stage renal disease becoming more prevalent, the importance of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is expected to rise even more. However, CAPD is associated with several infections with peritonitis being of the biggest importance.

METHODS

We collected data regarding acute peritonitis episodes (APEs), date of birth and CAPD start, BMI, diabetes mellitus (DM) prevalence, year of renal disease discovery, and details about renal replacement therapies. Primary outcomes included death, transplantation, and a switch to hemodialysis (HD).

RESULTS

Hundred and twenty-nine men and 123 women were analyzed. 63 patients had DM. The median age at the start of CAPD was 56. The median length of CAPD treatment was 24 months. In the end, 147 patients were still alive of which 97 were transplanted, 33 were on CAPD, and 26 were switched to HD. A total of 327 APE were observed.

CONCLUSION

Although the incidence is decreasing, efforts are required to enhance the prevention and treatment of APE.

Are sex differences in the outcome of peritoneal dialysis explained by nurse-assistance? A cohort study with data from the RDPLF

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate sex differences in peritoneal dialysis (PD) outcomes and to explore direct and indirect effects of nurse-assisted PD on outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study using data from the French Language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry of incident PD patients between 2005 and 2016. Cox proportional hazard modelling was used to analyse transfer to haemodialysis (HD), death, PD failure, peritonitis and renal transplantation. Mediation analyses with a counterfactual approach were carried out to evaluate natural direct and indirect effects of sex on transfer to HD and peritonitis, with nurse-assisted PD as a mediator a priori.

RESULTS

Of the 14659 patients included, they were 5970 females (41%) and 8689 males (59%). Women were more frequently treated by nurse-assisted PD than men ((2926/5970 (49.1%) vs. 3357/8689 (38.7%)). In the multivariable analysis, women had a lower risk of transfer to HD (cause-specific hazard ratio(cs-HR): 0.82[95% confidence interval(CI): 0.77-0.88]), death (cs-HR: 0.90[95%CI: 0.85-0.95]), peritonitis (cs-HR: 0.82[95%CI: 0.78-0.87]), PD failure (cs-HR: 0.86[95%CI: 0.83-0.90]) and a lower chance of undergoing transplant (cs-HR: 0.83[95%CI: 0.77-0.90]) than men. There was a direct effect of sex on the risk of transfer to HD (cs-HR: 0.82[95%CI: 0.82-0.83]) with an indirect effect of nurse-assisted PD (cs-HR: 0.97[95%CI: 0.96-0.99]). Nurse-assisted PD had no indirect effect on the risk of peritonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that compared with men, women have both a lower risk of transfer to HD and peritonitis. Mediation analysis showed that nurse assistance was a potential mediator in the causal pathway between sex and transfer to HD.