Polycystic kidney disease in patients on the renal transplant waiting list: trends in hematocrit and survival

BACKGROUND

The patient characteristics and mortality associated with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (PKD) have not been characterized for a national sample of end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on the renal transplant waiting list.

METHODS

40,493 patients in the United States Renal Data System who were initiated on ESRD therapy between 1 April 1995 and 29 June 1999 and later enrolled on the renal transplant waiting list were analyzed in an historical cohort study of the relationship between hematocrit at the time of presentation to ESRD and survival (using Cox Regression) in patients with PKD as a cause of ESRD.

RESULTS

Hematocrit levels at presentation to ESRD increased significantly over more recent years of the study. Hematocrit rose in parallel in patients with and without PKD, but patients with PKD had consistently higher hemoglobin. PKD was independently associated with higher hematocrit in multiple linear regression analysis (p < 0.0001). In logistic regression, higher hematocrit was independently associated with PKD. In Cox Regression analysis, PKD was associated with statistically significant improved survival both in comparison with diabetic (hazard ratio, 0.64, 95% CI 0.53-0.77, p < 0.001) and non-diabetic (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.56-0.82, p = 0.001) ESRD patients, adjusted for all other factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Hematocrit at presentation to ESRD was significantly higher in patients with PKD compared with patients with other causes of ESRD. The survival advantage of PKD in ESRD persisted even adjusted for differences in hematocrit and in comparison with patients on the renal transplant waiting list.

Iron status and iron supplementation in peritoneal dialysis patients

Iron deficiency represents an important problem in peritoneal dialysis patients, especially during erythropoietin therapy. A combination of serum ferritin, transferrin saturation, and/or the percentage of hypochromic red cells should be used to assess iron status in peritoneal dialysis patients. Primarily, oral iron supplementation should be the preferred therapy. However, most of the studies using oral substitution in erythropoietin-treated peritoneal dialysis patients show a progressive decline of serum ferritin. Therefore, parenteral iron supplementation is required in part of the patients, and the intravenous route should be preferred in these cases. Intravenous iron therapy is recommended if serum ferritin falls below 100 microg/liter and should be stopped if the serum ferritin level is more than 650 microg/liter. The optimal form of intravenous iron supplementation is still unclear. Injections once to three times per week restrict the patients' flexibility, but application of higher doses in longer intervals may lead to an impairment of neutrophil functions, probably connected to a higher risk of infection. We treated 17 stable peritoneal dialysis patients with 100 or 200 mg iron saccharate monthly over a period of six months and found an increase of transferrin saturation (from 12.1+/-1.6 to 20.9+/-2.4%, P = 0.026), serum ferritin (from 100.4+/-32.0 to 372.4+/-54.6 microg/liter, NS) and hematocrit (from 32.0+/-0.8% to 35.1+/-0.9%, P = 0.099). The required erythropoietin dosage could be reduced significantly (from 148.4+/-30.3 to 69.4+/-19.5 U/kg/week, P = 0.025). Side effects occurred in 0.9% after application of 100 mg and in 5.9% after injection of 200 mg iron saccharate. The incidence of catheter infections and peritonitis was the same in the period before and after the start of treatment. Further studies are needed to find the most suitable regime of iron supplementation for peritoneal dialysis patients.