Distance from care predicts in-hospital mortality in HIV-infected patients with severe sepsis from rural and semi-rural Virginia, USA

Associations between treatment burden, self-reported treatment qualities, antiretroviral therapy obtainment, and health-related quality of life among Ugandan PLWH

BACKGROUND

Understanding related risk factors of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) could avoid treatment failure and provide an insight of personalized treatment approach among people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWH). The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with self-reported treatment qualities and domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among PLWH in Uganda.

METHOD

Data were from "Life on antiretroviral therapy: People's adaptive coping and adjustment to living with HIV as a chronic condition in Wakiso District, Uganda" in English. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire was used to assess the HRQoL of 263 PLWH in the sample. Considering variance inflation factors, multiple regression analyses were performed to assess the associations between demographic factors, ART obtainment, treatment burden, and self-reported treatment qualities, associations between demographic factors, self-reported treatment qualities, and HRQoL, and association between ART obtainment and HRQoL. Controlling for the confounding effects, several regression anatomies were employed to explore the associations between self-reported treatment qualities and six domains of HRQoL.

RESULTS

In the sample, the geographical distribution were urban (5.70%), semi-urban (37.26%), and rural (57.03%). 67.30% of the participants were females. The mean age of the sample was 39.82 years (standard deviation = 9.76) ranging from 22 to 81 years. Multiple logistic regressions reported statistically significant associations of distance to ART facility with self-reported quality of services, advice, manners, and counseling, statistically significant association between self-reported manners quality and four domains of HRQoL, and statistically significant association between TASO membership and domains of HRQoL. Plots from regression anatomies reported that self-reported treatment qualities had statistically significant associations with six domains of HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment burden, self-reported treatment qualities, ART obtainment, and TASO were possible determinants of individual domains of HRQoL among PLWH in Uganda. PLWH's HRQoL might be improved by promoting medical quality and optimizing ART obtainment in the healthcare providers' practice. Findings in this study had important implications for the redesign of clinical guidelines, healthcare delivery, and health care co-ordination among PLWH globally.

Home-to-Hospital Distance and Outcomes Among Community-Acquired Sepsis Hospitalizations

PURPOSE

To examine the hypothesis that longer distance from home-to-hospital is associated with worse outcomes among hospitalizations for community-acquired sepsis.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of data from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) prospective cohort of 30,239 white and black US adults ≥ 45 years old was conducted. Self-reported hospitalizations for serious infection between 2003-2012 fulfilling 2/4 systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria were included. Estimated driving distance was derived from geocoded data and evaluated continuously and as quartiles of very close, close, far, very far (<3.1, 3.1-5.8, 5.9-11.5, and >11.5 miles respectively). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality while the secondary outcome was sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score on arrival.

RESULTS

912 hospitalizations for community-acquired sepsis had adequate data for analysis. The median (interquartile range) estimated driving distance was 5.8 miles (3.1,11.7), and 54 (5.9%) experienced the primary outcome. Compared to living very close, participants living very far had a mortality odds ratio of 1.30 (95% CI 0.64,2.62) and presenting SOFA score difference of 0.33 (95% CI -0.03,0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

Among a national sample of community-acquired sepsis hospitalizations, there was no significant association between home-to-hospital distance and either 30-day mortality or SOFA score on hospital presentation.

Impact of Socioeconomic Status and Race on Sepsis Epidemiology and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic status (SES) is a complex variable that is derived primarily from an individual's education, income, and occupation and has been found to be inversely related to outcomes of health conditions. Sepsis is the sixth most common admitting diagnosis and one of the most costly conditions for in-hospital spending in the United States. The objective of this review is to report on the relationship between SES and sepsis incidence and associated outcomes.

CONTENT

Sepsis epidemiology varies when explored by race, education, geographic location, income, and insurance status. Sepsis incidence was significantly increased in individuals of Black race compared with non-Hispanic white race; in persons who have less formal education, who lack insurance, and who have low income; and in certain US regions. People with low SES are likely to have onset of sepsis significantly earlier in life and to have poorly controlled comorbidities compared with those with higher SES. Sepsis mortality and hospital readmission is increased in individuals who lack insurance, who reside in low-income or medically underserved areas, who live far from healthcare, and who lack higher level education; however, a person's race was not consistently found to increase mortality.

SUMMARY

Interventions to minimize healthcare disparity for individuals with low SES should target sepsis prevention with increasing measures for preventive care for chronic conditions. Significant barriers described for access to care by people with low SES include cost, transportation, poor health literacy, and lack of a social network. Future studies should include polysocial risk scores that are consistently defined to allow for meaningful comparison across studies.

Travel time to emergency care not by geographic time, but by optimal time: A nationwide cross-sectional study for establishing optimal hospital access time to emergency medical care in South Korea

Increase in travel time, beyond a critical point, to emergency care may lead to a residential disparity in the outcome of patients with acute conditions. However, few studies have evaluated the evidence of travel time benchmarks in view of the association between travel time and outcome. Thus, this study aimed to establish the optimal hospital access time (OHAT) for emergency care in South Korea. We used nationwide healthcare claims data collected by the National Health Insurance System database of South Korea. Claims data of 445,548 patients who had visited emergency centers between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2014 were analyzed. Travel time, by vehicle from the residence of the patient, to the emergency center was calculated. Thirteen emergency care-sensitive conditions (ECSCs) were selected by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The 30-day mortality after discharge was set as the outcome measure of emergency care. A change-point analysis was performed to identify the threshold where the mortality of ECSCs changed significantly. The differences in risk-adjusted mortality between patients living outside of OHAT and those living inside OHAT were evaluated. Five ECSCs showed a significant threshold where the mortality changed according to their OHAT. These were intracranial injury, acute myocardial infarction, other acute ischemic heart disease, fracture of the femur, and sepsis. The calculated OHAT were 71-80 min, 31-40 min, 70-80 min, 41-50 min, and 61-70 min, respectively. Those who lived outside the OHAT had higher risks of death, even after adjustment (adjusted OR: 1.04-7.21; 95% CI: 1.03-26.34). In conclusion, the OHAT for emergency care with no significant increase in mortality is in the 31-80 min range. Optimal travel time to hospital should be established by optimal time for outcomes, and not by geographic time, to resolve the disparities in geographical accessibility to emergency care.

Distance Between Home and the Admitting Hospital and Its Effect on Survival of Low Socioeconomic Status Population With Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

OBJECTIVE

Bacteremia is the presence of bacteria in the bloodstream. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between low socioeconomic status (SES) and the epidemiology, process of care, and outcomes of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB).

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study that evaluated adult patients with SAB in 3 Los Angeles County hospitals from July 15, 2012, through May 31, 2018. We determined SES (low SES, intermediate SES, and high SES) for each patient and compared sociodemographic and epidemiologic characteristics, management of care received by patients with SAB (ie, process of care), and outcomes. We used a Cox proportional hazards model to determine predictors of 30-day mortality for each SES group.

RESULTS

Of 915 patients included in the sample, 369 (40%) were in the low-SES group, 294 (32%) in the intermediate-SES group, and 252 (28%) in the high-SES group. Most significant predictors of 30-day mortality in the Cox proportional hazards model were admission to an intensive care unit (hazard ratio [HR] = 9.04; 95% CI, 4.26-19.14), Pitt bacteremia score ≥4 indicating critical illness (HR = 4.30; 95% CI, 2.49-7.44), having ≥3 comorbidities (HR = 2.05; 95% CI, 1.09-3.85), and advanced age (HR = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05). Distance between home and admitting hospital affected mortality only in the low-SES group (HR = 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02).

CONCLUSIONS

SES did not independently affect the outcome of SAB; however, the farther the patient's residence from the hospital, the greater the negative effect on survival in a low-SES population. Our findings underscore the need to develop multipronged, targeted public health efforts for populations that have transportation barriers to health care.

Efficacy of raltegravir, etravirine and darunavir/ritonavir for treatment-experienced HIV patients from a non-urban clinic population in the United States

BACKGROUND

The regimen of raltegravir (RAL), ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DAR/r), and etravirine (ETR) for HIV treatment-experienced patients in a non-clinical trial setting in the rural/semi-urban United States had not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed of adult patients prescribed the regimen from 2008 to 2013 at a HIV clinic serving such a population.

RESULTS

In all, 51 patients met inclusion criteria including 15 with suppressed viral loads at regimen initiation. Of the 36 patients with detectable viral loads, 22 (61.1%) achieved a plasma HIV-1 RNA level < 50 copies/ml at 28 weeks and 17 maintained viral suppression at 56 weeks (50% of those surviving without death). Of 42 patients with long-term follow-up, mean of 216 ± 83 weeks following regimen initiation, 31 (73.8%) had viral suppression. Suppression was significantly more likely in those patients that maintained adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

In a non-urban clinic population from the United States with considerable treatment experience, the combination of RAL, DAR/r, and ETR was well tolerated and resulted in viral suppression in those that maintained adherence. Future prospective studies may better define the role of such a regimen in the context of revised recommendations for first-line medications in the HIV treatment naïve.

Are differences in travel time or distance to healthcare for adults in global north countries associated with an impact on health outcomes? A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether there is an association between differences in travel time/travel distance to healthcare services and patients' health outcomes and assimilate the methodologies used to measure this.

DESIGN

Systematic Review. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Transport database, HMIC and EBM Reviews for studies up to 7 September 2016. Studies were excluded that included children (including maternity), emergency medical travel or countries classed as being in the global south.

SETTINGS

A wide range of settings within primary and secondary care (these were not restricted in the search).

RESULTS

108 studies met the inclusion criteria. The results were mixed. 77% of the included studies identified evidence of a distance decay association, whereby patients living further away from healthcare facilities they needed to attend had worse health outcomes (eg, survival rates, length of stay in hospital and non-attendance at follow-up) than those who lived closer. 6 of the studies identified the reverse (a distance bias effect) whereby patients living at a greater distance had better health outcomes. The remaining 19 studies found no relationship. There was a large variation in the data available to the studies on the patients' geographical locations and the healthcare facilities attended, and the methods used to calculate travel times and distances were not consistent across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The review observed that a relationship between travelling further and having worse health outcomes cannot be ruled out and should be considered within the healthcare services location debate.