Sinecatechins and imiquimod as proactive sequential therapy of external genital and perianal warts in adults

[Anogenital warts-An update]

With a prevalence of around 1% in the sexually active population anogenital warts are the most frequent human papillomavirus (HPV)-related disease. In the vast majority of cases the underlying cause of the infection is due to HPV types 6 and 11. The diagnosis can usually be clinically established but in certain cases a histopathological work-up can be useful. Buschke-Lowenstein tumors represent such a scenario. The current therapeutic armamentarium for anogenital warts ranges from surgical ablative procedures up to local immunomodulatory treatment. All procedures have different advantages and disadvantages and are relatively time-consuming and sometimes also unpleasant for the patient. Anogenital warts are also a possible expression of an incomplete immunological control of HPV. Therefore, it should be emphasized that for certain affected individuals, especially immunosuppressed patients, special attention should be given to ensuring that screening investigations for HPV-associated dysplasia is carried out according to the respective valid guidelines. The primary prophylaxis by vaccination of girls and boys prior to first HPV exposure represents a very effective option to drastically reduce the prevalence of anogenital warts and other HPV-related diseases.

Clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous warts (2022)

AIM

Cutaneous warts caused by human papillomavirus are benign proliferative lesions that occur at any ages in human lives. Updated, comprehensive and systematic evidence-based guidelines to guide clinical practice are urgently needed.

METHODS

We collaborated with multidisciplinary experts to formulate this guideline based on evidences of already published literature, focusing on 13 clinical questions elected by a panel of experts. We adopted Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to form classification of recommendations as well as the improved Delphi method to retain respective recommendations with a consensus degree of over 80%.

RESULTS

Our guideline covered aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous warts such as diagnostic gold standard, transmission routes, laboratory tests, treatment principle, clinical cure criterion, definitions, and treatments of common warts, flat warts, plantar warts, condyloma acuminatum, and epidermodysplasia verruciformis. Recommendations about special population such as children and pregnant women are also listed. In total, 49 recommendations have been obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

It is a comprehensive and systematic evidence-based guideline and we hope this guideline could systematically and effectively guide the clinical practice of cutaneous warts and improve the overall levels of medical services.

Assessment of sinecatechins 10% ointment used as proactive sequential therapy in recurrence rate of genital warts lesions after cryotherapy. The PACT-II Trial (postablation immunomodulator treatment of condylomata with sinecatechins): a prospective assessor-blinded, multicenter, pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Cryotherapy is commonly used as ablative treatment of external genital warts (EGW). However, after cryotherapy recurrence of lesions affects on average 45% (42-70%) of subjects in the 6 months after the treatment. Sinecatechins 10% are an effective topical treatment of EGW. A low recurrence rate (<6%) was observed in pivotal phase 3 trials conducted with this product. Topical sinecatechins have demonstrated to significantly reduce the recurrence rate of EGW in subjects treated with laser therapy (The PACT-I trial). So far, no prospective data are available regarding the efficacy of sinecathechins as immunomodulator sequential therapy after cryotherapy in EGW subjects. The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of recurrence lesions after the use of topical sinecatechins 10%, as sequential proactive immunomodulation treatment after cryotherapy in subjects with EGW (The PACT-II Trial: the postablation immunomodulator treatment of condylomata with sinecatechins trial) (Trial Registration number: ISRCTN44037479).

METHODS

In a prospective, assessor-blinded, multicenter trial a total of 55 subjects with a diagnosis of multiple EGW (36 men and 19 women, mean age 47±10 years) and a mean lesion number of 9±7, after their informed consent, were enrolled in the study. All subjects were treated with cryotherapy (an average of 2 sessions). After the ablative treatment, all subjects were instructed to apply sinecatechin 10% ointment 3 times daily for 4 consecutive months. The primary study endpoint was the evaluation (assessor-blinded) of recurrent lesions after 6 months (2 month of follow-up after the conclusion of topical treatment). The secondary study endpoints were the appearance of new EGW lesions (lesions affecting area not treated by cryotherapy) and the local tolerability.

RESULTS

At baseline, the mean number of EGW lesions were 9±7. After cryotherapy, the mean lesions number were reduced to 1.6±1.8. At month 4, EGW mean lesion number were 0.2±0.4 (P=0.0001 vs. after cryotherapy). At month 6, recurrence of lesions was detected in 10 subjects (18%; 95% CI: 9-30%) with an average of 1.4 lesions. Of these recurrent lesions, 6 occurred in completely healed lesions site after cryotherapy and 8 in partially healed ones. New lesions (outside the cryotherapy treated area) were observed in 10 subjects. The product was very well tolerated. No serious side effects were reported. Three subjects reported moderate skin irritation on the application site.

CONCLUSIONS

The PACT-II Trial has shown that the recurrence rate of EGW lesions after successful cryotherapy using sinecatechins as immunomodulator sequential therapy is lower in comparison with the percentage documented in the literature without sequential therapy (20 vs. 45%). These results are in line with already published data evaluating the role of sinecatechins after laser therapy (PACT-I trial). Future comparative, double-blind controlled trials assessing the efficacy of different proactive strategies are warranted.

[Consensus on HPV of the Portuguese Society of Andrology, Sexual Medicine and Reproduction: Treatment]

The treatment of condyloma is generally a challenge in clinical practice. Although the spontaneous resolution rate is high, a significant proportion of patients seek treatment, not because of symptomatology, but mainly for aesthetic issues and concerns related to the transmission or worsening of existing lesions. The available treatments should be applied only for clinically evident macroscopic lesions. Ideally, available therapies should have rapid action onset and clearance, resolve symptoms, reduce recurrence rate and viral load, be effective in treating small lesions, and be well tolerated. However, none of the currently available treatments is clearly more effective than the others and there is no ideal treatment for all patients or for all condyloma. Therefore, the therapeutic decision should be based on the clinician's experience, available resources, lesion morphology, size, number and location, primary or recurrent lesions, disease severity, patient preference and expectations, patient's immune competence, convenience, tolerance, cost of treatment and results of previous therapies. The available treatments are divided into three groups: applied by the patient himself (imiquimod 3.75 or 5%, podophyllotoxin .5%, synecatekines 10% or 15%), applied by the health care provider (bi- and tricloacetic acids 80%-90%, intralesional interferon alpha, cryotherapy, surgical removal, electrofulguration, laser ablation) and experimental or alternative therapies (topical cidofovir, intralesional bleomycin, photodynamic therapy). Treatment methodologies can be further divided into their action - ablative or destructive treatment (cryotherapy, electrofulguration, laser ablation, surgical excision), cytotoxic or proapoptotic treatments (podophyllotoxin .5%, 5-fluoruracil, bleomycin) and immunomodulatory treatments (imiquimod 3.75% or 5%, synecatekines 10% or 15%, intralesional interferon alpha). The overall success rate of the various treatments available ranges from 23% to 94%. Only treatments that include cryotherapy or surgical excision are suitable in condyloma with any anatomical location and that have the highest success rate in monotherapy. Recurrences are common regardless of the treatment received. In contrast, immunomodulatory therapies despite having lower initial clearance rates appear to have higher probabilities of cure in the medium term, with low recurrence rates. Some treatments may be combined with each other and the effectiveness of combined therapies appears to be superior to monotherapy (proactive sequential treatment). The consensuses for the treatment of HPV also consider special situations: immunocompromised patients, meatus and intraurethral lesions and treatment of the partner.

A systematic review evaluating the efficacy and safety of a combination of ablative treatment and self administered treatment versus ablative treatment alone for external anogenital warts

BACKGROUND

External anogenital warts are proliferative lesions. Till now, there is no consensus on the standard treatment of external anogenital warts. The combination of ablative therapy and self-administered treatment has been reported to achieve sustained complete clearance than ablative therapy. The aim of this review was to compare the efficacy on achieving complete clearance of warts between the combination of ablative therapy with self-administered therapy and ablative therapy alone.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of ablative therapy and self-administered treatment for external anogenital warts. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase and Science Citation Index Expanded, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang were searched.

RESULTS

Of 1138 initially identified publications, 37 studies in English and Chinese were included. The combination of ablative therapy and self-administered treatment therapy showed significantly high complete clearance rates at 4, 8, 12, or 24 weeks after treatment compared to ablative therapy alone. In a subgroup analysis based on the treatment duration of imiquimod cream therapy, 4 and 8 weeks of imiquimod 5% cream plus CO₂ laser produced similar efficacy on clearance. The combination therapy is tolerable for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, this review provided evidence to support the use of the combination of ablative therapy and self-administered treatment for external anogenital warts to maintain sustained clearance.

Benign dermatoses of the male genital areas: A review of the literature

The male genitalia are a common site of dermatoses. Patients with penile diseases often delay or avoid medical care due to anxiety and embarrassment. In this narrative review, we describe some of the main benign dermatoses localized to male genital, focusing on their epidemiology, clinical and dermoscopic features, as well as available therapies.

Position statement for the diagnosis and management of anogenital warts

BACKGROUND

Anogenital warts (AGW) can cause economic burden on healthcare systems and are associated with emotional, psychological and physical issues.

OBJECTIVE

To provide guidance to physicians on the diagnosis and management of AGW.

METHODS

Fourteen global experts on AGW developed guidance on the diagnosis and management of AGW in an effort to unify international recommendations. Guidance was developed based on published international and national AGW guidelines and an evaluation of relevant literature published up to August 2016. Authors provided expert opinion based on their clinical experiences.

RESULTS

A checklist for a patient's initial consultation is provided to help physicians when diagnosing AGW to get the relevant information from the patient in order to manage and treat the AGW effectively. A number of frequently asked questions are also provided to aid physicians when communicating with patients about AGW. Treatment of AGW should be individualized and selected based on the number, size, morphology, location, and keratinization of warts, and whether they are new or recurrent. Different techniques can be used to treat AGW including ablation, immunotherapy and other topical therapies. Combinations of these techniques are thought to be more effective at reducing AGW recurrence than monotherapy. A simplified algorithm was created suggesting patients with 1-5 warts should be treated with ablation followed by immunotherapy. Patients with >5 warts should use immunotherapy for 2 months followed by ablation and a second 2-month course of immunotherapy. Guidance for daily practice situations and the subsequent action that can be taken, as well as an algorithm for treatment of large warts, were also created.

CONCLUSION

The guidance provided will help physicians with the diagnosis and management of AGW in order to improve the health and quality of life of patients with AGW.

Anogenital warts treatment options: a practical approach

Anogenital warts (AGWs) are an important issue for public health centers dealing with Sexually Transmitted Infections. They are epidemiologically relevant, with significant morbidity and an established effective treatment is lacking. In this article, we examine the epidemiological, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspect of the problem in order to give an up to date picture of the situation and a practical clue for the management of AGWs.

Efficacy of sinecatechins 10% as proactive sequential therapy of external genital warts after laser CO2 ablative therapy: The PACT study (post-ablation immunomodulator treatment of condylomata with sinecatechins): a randomized, masked outcome assessment, multicenter trial

External genital warts (EGW) are the most common viral sexually transmitted infection. Ablative treatments like cryotherapy, curettage, and CO₂ laser therapies offer rapid onset of effect, fast clearance, and reduction of virus load. However, these procedures are associated with high recurrence rates (RRs) ranging from 20% to 77% in the short and medium terms and do not provide sustained clearance. After laser therapy removal of EGW, an RR up to 77% has been reported. Topical sinecatechins (TS) 10% is a patient-applied regimen for the treatment of EGW with a low RR (<6.5%) at three months after completion of the therapy in the pivotal trials conducted so far. Sinecatechins can be considered a suitable proactive sequential therapy (PST) after ablative strategies to obtain a low RR. So far, no prospective data are available regarding the efficacy of sinecatechins 10% as PST. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of TS 10% ointment applied twice daily in subjects with "difficult to treat" EGW after CO₂ laser ablative treatment in a prospective controlled trial. A total of 87 subjects (76 men and 11 women; mean age 42 years) were enrolled in this three-month masked outcome assessment parallel group trial with imbalanced randomization allocation (2:1). One week after a successful CO₂ laser treatment, 60 subjects were randomized to TS 10% treatment and 27 subjects to no treatment (control group: ConTRol (CTR); no sequential therapy). All patients had a history of an average of 4.5 previous ablative treatments in the last 12 months due to recurrent EGW. Mean (standard deviation) baseline number of treated lesions was 6.5 (2.7). One subject in the TS arm dropped out due to burning sensation after the application of the product. Therefore, 86 subjects completed the study. After three months, in the TS group, three subjects presented new EGW lesions (RR: 5%) on treated sites. In the CTR group, eight subjects presented new EGW lesions (RR: 29%) on treated sites (p = 0.0024; odds ratio: 0.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.68). In the TS group, 34 subjects (56%) reported mild to moderate erythema or burning sensation at the application site. In this prospective multicenter trial, the use of TS 10% as PST after ablative treatment with CO₂ laser was associated with a lower recurrence rate of new EGW lesions in the short term in comparison with the control group. Comparative larger trials are warranted to evaluate the role of this approach as PST (Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN44037479).

The Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge of Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

No single modality of care serves as the defined best practice for the treatment of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN). This review aims to present the common treatment modalities germane to AIN while considering evolving evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

AIN affords an opportunity to evaluate and treat patients before the development of invasive diseases. Efforts to screen for AIN have yielded mixed results. The major available pharmacotheraputic and surgical options offer efficacious options to reduce the bioburden of disease but can be met with high levels of recurrent disease. None affords a predictably durable response in severe disease. Vaccination as primary prevention will likely reduce the overall upward trend in AIN. Evidence suggests vaccination also affords improvement in recurrent disease. Early evidence reveals potential benefit in multimodal approaches to control AIN. Valuable data is anticipated from the phase III, randomized ANCHOR study evaluating the management of high-grade AIN in HIV +patients.