1
|
Botvinik-Nezer R, Petre B, Ceko M, Lindquist MA, Friedman NP, Wager TD. Placebo treatment affects brain systems related to affective and cognitive processes, but not nociceptive pain. Nat Commun 2024; 15:6017. [PMID: 39019888 PMCID: PMC11255344 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50103-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Drug treatments for pain often do not outperform placebo, and a better understanding of placebo mechanisms is needed to improve treatment development and clinical practice. In a large-scale fMRI study (N = 392) with pre-registered analyses, we tested whether placebo analgesic treatment modulates nociceptive processes, and whether its effects generalize from conditioned to unconditioned pain modalities. Placebo treatment caused robust analgesia in conditioned thermal pain that generalized to unconditioned mechanical pain. However, placebo did not decrease pain-related fMRI activity in brain measures linked to nociceptive pain, including the Neurologic Pain Signature (NPS) and spinothalamic pathway regions, with strong support for null effects in Bayes Factor analyses. In addition, surprisingly, placebo increased activity in some spinothalamic regions for unconditioned mechanical pain. In contrast, placebo reduced activity in a neuromarker associated with higher-level contributions to pain, the Stimulus Intensity Independent Pain Signature (SIIPS), and affected activity in brain regions related to motivation and value, in both pain modalities. Individual differences in behavioral analgesia were correlated with neural changes in both modalities. Our results indicate that cognitive and affective processes primarily drive placebo analgesia, and show the potential of neuromarkers for separating treatment influences on nociception from influences on evaluative processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rotem Botvinik-Nezer
- Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
| | - Bogdan Petre
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Marta Ceko
- Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Martin A Lindquist
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Naomi P Friedman
- Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Tor D Wager
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mostafa R, McNair NA, Tan W, Saunders C, Colagiuri B, Barnes K. Interpersonal physiological and psychological synchrony predict the social transmission of nocebo hyperalgesia between individuals. COMMUNICATIONS PSYCHOLOGY 2024; 2:33. [PMID: 39242740 PMCID: PMC11332037 DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00069-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
Witnessing another's pain can heighten pain in the observer. However, research has focused on the observer's intrapersonal experience. Here, a social transmission-chain explored the spread of socially-acquired nocebo hyperalgesia. Dyads of genuine participants were randomised to 'Generations' (G1-G3). G1-Demonstrators, observed by G2-Observers, experienced high/low thermal pain contingent on supposed activity/inactivity of a sham-treatment. G2 became Demonstrators, witnessed by G3-Observers. They experienced fixed low-temperature stimuli irrespective of sham-treatment 'activity'. G3 then Demonstrated for G4-Observers (a confederate), also experiencing low-temperature stimuli only. Pain ratings, electrodermal activity, and facial action units were measured. G1's treatment-related pain propagated throughout the chain. G2 and G3 participants showed heightened subjective and physiological response to sham-treatment, despite equivalent stimulus temperatures, and G3 never witnessing the initial pain-event. Dyadic interpersonal physiological synchrony (electrodermal activity) and psychological synchrony (Observer's ability to predict the Demonstrator's pain), predicted subsequent socially-acquired pain. Implications relate to the interpersonal spread of maladaptive pain experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodela Mostafa
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Winston Tan
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Cosette Saunders
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ben Colagiuri
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten Barnes
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rooney T, Sharpe L, Todd J, Livesey E, Colagiuri B. Understanding the Role of Expectancy, Anticipatory Anxiety, and Attention Bias in Nocebo Hyperalgesia: A Gaze-Contingent Attention Bias Modification Study. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2024; 25:946-961. [PMID: 37879546 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Nocebo effects in pain (nocebo hyperalgesia) have been thoroughly researched, and negative expectancies have been proposed as a key factor in causing nocebo hyperalgesia. However, little is known about the psychological mechanisms by which expectations exacerbate the perception of pain. A potential mechanism that has been proposed within wider pain research is pain-related attention. The aim of the present study was thus to explore whether attention bias (AB) to pain influenced nocebo hyperalgesia. One-hundred and thirty-four healthy participants were randomized in a 2 (AB training: towards vs away from pain) × 2 (nocebo condition: nocebo vs control) design. Pain-related AB was manipulated through a novel, partially gaze-contingent dot-probe task. Participants then completed either a nocebo instruction and conditioning paradigm or a matched control condition. Primary outcomes were measures of expectancy, anticipatory anxiety, and pain intensity completed during a nocebo test phase. Results showed that the AB manipulation was unsuccessful in inducing ABs either toward or away from pain. The nocebo paradigm induced significantly greater expectancy, anticipatory anxiety, and pain intensity for the nocebo groups compared to the control groups. In a posthoc analysis of participants with correctly induced ABs, AB towards pain amplified nocebo hyperalgesia, expectancy, and anticipatory anxiety relative to AB away from pain. The results are consistent with the expectancy model of nocebo effects and additionally identify anticipatory anxiety as an additional factor. Regarding AB, research is needed to develop reliable means to change attention sample-wide to corroborate the present findings. PERSPECTIVE: This article explores the role of AB, expectancy, and anticipatory anxiety in nocebo hyperalgesia. The study shows that expectancy can trigger anticipatory anxiety that exacerbates nocebo hyperalgesia. Further, successful AB training towards pain heightens nocebo hyperalgesia. These findings identify candidate psychological factors to target in minimizing nocebo hyperalgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Rooney
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louise Sharpe
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jemma Todd
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Evan Livesey
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ben Colagiuri
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bieniek H, Bąbel P. Placebo hypoalgesia induced by operant conditioning: a comparative study on the effects of verbal, token-based, and social rewards and punishers. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20346. [PMID: 37989856 PMCID: PMC10663593 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47482-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Operant conditioning was shown to be a mechanism of placebo hypoalgesia; however, only verbal rewards and punishers were applied in the previous study. We aimed to induce placebo hypoalgesia using more clinically relevant consequences: token-based and social. Participants were divided into three experimental groups (with verbal, social, and token-based rewards and punishers); and two control groups (with and without placebo application). During operant conditioning, participants in the experimental groups received thermal stimuli of equal intensity and were rewarded for reporting lower pain and punished for reporting higher pain compared to their pretest pain levels. The control groups did not receive any consequences. Our results revealed placebo hypoalgesia was induced by operant conditioning only in the experimental groups with social and token-based reinforcement, compared to the control groups. The hypoalgesic effect found in the group that received verbal reinforcement did not differ significantly from the control group with the placebo application. Moreover, expectations about upcoming pain intensity were found to be a mediator, and the number of reinforcers received during conditioning was a predictor of placebo hypoalgesia. These findings highlight the potential benefits of incorporating token-based and social consequences for optimizing treatment outcomes in pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Bieniek
- Institute of Psychology, Pain Research Group, Jagiellonian University, ul. Ingardena 6, 30-060, Kraków, Poland.
- Doctoral School in the Social Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
| | - Przemysław Bąbel
- Institute of Psychology, Pain Research Group, Jagiellonian University, ul. Ingardena 6, 30-060, Kraków, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lanario JW, Hudson E, Locher C, Dee A, Elliot K, Davies AF. Body reprogramming for fibromyalgia and central sensitivity syndrome: A preliminary evaluation. SAGE Open Med 2023; 11:20503121231207207. [PMID: 37920842 PMCID: PMC10619357 DOI: 10.1177/20503121231207207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Central sensitivity syndrome disorders such as fibromyalgia, provoke continued debate, highlighting diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainty. The Hyland model provides a way of understanding and treating the medically unexplained symptoms of central sensitivity syndromes using complexity theory and principles of adaption in network systems. The body reprogramming is a multi-modal intervention based on the Hyland model designed for patients living with medically unexplained symptoms. This preliminary, naturalistic and single-arm service evaluation set out to evaluate outcome after attending a body reprogramming course in patients living with fibromyalgia or central sensitivity syndrome. Methods Patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia or central sensitivity syndrome were recruited. The body reprogramming courses consisting of eight sessions, each 2.5 h in length, were run at two study sites in England. Data were collected at baseline, post course and 3-months post course using questionnaires assessing symptomatology (FIQR/SIQR), Depression (PHQ9), Anxiety (GAD7) and quality of life (GQoL). Repeated measures t-tests were used, and all comparisons were conducted on an intention to treat basis. Results In total, 198 patients with a mean age of 47.73 years were enrolled on the body reprogramming courses. Statistically and clinically significant improvement were observed in the FIQR from baseline to post course (mean change: 11.28) and baseline to follow-up (mean change: 15.09). PHQ9 scores also improved significantly from baseline to post course (mean reduction 3.72) and baseline to follow-up (mean reduction 5.59). Conclusions Our study provides first evidence that the body reprogramming intervention is an effective approach for patients living with fibromyalgia or central sensitivity syndromes on a variety of clinical measures. Besides these promising results, important limitations of the study are discussed, and larger randomized controlled trials are clearly warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Esther Hudson
- Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Redruth, Cornwall, UK
| | - Cosima Locher
- Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
- University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Annily Dee
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Kerry Elliot
- Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust, Truro, Cornwall, UK
| | - Anthony F Davies
- Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weik E, Neuenschwander R, Edgington B, Jensen K, Tipper CM, Oberlander TF. Conditioning induced placebo-like and nocebo-like effects of thermal discomfort in adults but not in youth. Br J Pain 2023; 17:342-351. [PMID: 37538948 PMCID: PMC10395395 DOI: 10.1177/20494637231153364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Conditioning can be used to modulate the perception of pain, in the form of placebo and nocebo effects. Previous studies show inconsistent results as to whether adolescents show similar, weaker, or non-significant conditioned placebo and nocebo effects compared to effects found in adults. There are suggestions that such differences (if any) may dependent on the cues used in the thermal conditioning paradigms. Therefore, in this current study, we utilized novel, neutral 3D-shaped visual cues to implicitly induce conditioned placebo-like and nocebo-like effects in adolescents and adults. Methods During the conditioning paradigm, distinct cues (Fribbles) were paired with low and high temperatures in 24 adults and 20 adolescents (mean age = 25.5 years). In the testing phase, these conditioned cues as well as a neutral (unconditioned) cue were presented with moderate temperatures. Results Thermal discomfort of moderate temperatures was lower when presented with the conditioned low heat cue (placebo-like effect) and higher when thermal stimuli were presented with the high heat cue (nocebo-like effect) compared to the neutral cue. The effects were driven by adults, as neither the placebo-like nor the nocebo-like effect was significant in adolescents. The difference between adolescents and adults was not explained by differences in temperature or discomfort levels, as adults and adolescents had comparable calibrated temperatures and levels of discomfort during heat stimuli. Conclusion Our findings suggest that thermal perception in adolescents is less influenced by conditioning to an engaging novel visual cue, compared to adults. Our work may have implications for better understanding the scope and limitations of conditioning as a key mechanism of placebo and nocebo effects in youth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ella Weik
- Department of Psychiatry, BC Mental Health and Addictions Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Regula Neuenschwander
- Department of Pediatrics, BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of British, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Brinn Edgington
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Karin Jensen
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christine M Tipper
- Department of Pediatrics, BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of British, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Tim F Oberlander
- Department of Psychiatry, BC Mental Health and Addictions Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
González Aroca J, Díaz ÁP, Navarrete C, Albarnez L. Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Are Associated with Pain Intensity and Shoulder Disability in Adults with Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12103376. [PMID: 37240482 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Shoulder pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal conditions, and for people over 40 years old, it represents the musculoskeletal pain with the greatest impact on quality of life. Psychological factors, such as fear-avoidance beliefs, are associated with musculoskeletal pain, and several studies suggest that they can influence various treatment outcomes. Our objective was to explore the cross-sectional association between fear-avoidance beliefs and shoulder pain intensity and disability in subjects with chronic shoulder pain. A cross-sectional study was conducted, and 208 participants with chronic unilateral subacromial shoulder pain were recruited. The shoulder pain and disability index assessed pain intensity and disability. The Spanish fear-avoidance components scale assessed the presence of fear-avoidance beliefs. The association between fear-avoidance beliefs and pain intensity and disability was analyzed by means of multiple linear regression models and proportional odds models, reporting odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Shoulder and pain disability scores were significantly associated with fear-avoidance beliefs (p < 0.0001, adjusted R-square 0.93, multiple linear regression). There was no evidence of an association between sex and age in this study. The regression coefficient for shoulder pain intensity and disability score was 0.67446. The proportional odds model showed an odds ratio of 1.39 (1.29-1.50) for shoulder pain intensity and disability total score. This study suggests that greater levels of fear-avoidance beliefs are associated with greater levels of shoulder pain and disability in adults with chronic shoulder pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Carlos Navarrete
- Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of La Serena, La Serena 1700000, Chile
| | - Loreto Albarnez
- School of Kinesiology, University of La Serena, La Serena 1700000, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Neuroscientific evidence for pain being a classically conditioned response to trauma- and pain-related cues in humans. Pain 2022; 163:2118-2137. [PMID: 35239544 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Psychological trauma is typically accompanied by physical pain, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) often co-occurs with chronic pain. Clinical reports suggest that pain after trauma may be part of a re-experiencing symptomatology. Classical conditioning can underlie visual re-experiencing since intrusions can occur as conditioned responses (CRs) to trauma-related cues. If individuals also experience pain to cues previously paired with, but not anymore inflicting nociceptive stimulation (CSs), conditioning could also explain re-experiencing of pain. Sixty-five participants underwent classical conditioning, where painful electrocutaneous stimulation and aversive film-clips served as unconditioned stimuli (USs) in a 2(pain/no pain)×2(aversive/neutral film) design. CSs were neutral pictures depicting contextual details from the films. One day later, participants were re-exposed to CSs during a memory-triggering-task (MTT). We assessed pain-CRs by self-report and an fMRI-based marker of nociceptive pain, the neurologic pain signature (NPS); and recorded spontaneous daily-life pain-intrusions with an e-diary. During conditioning, pain-signaling CSs elicited more self-reported-pain and NPS-responses than no-pain-signaling CSs. Possibly because the aversive-film masked differences in participants' responses to pain-signaling vs. no-pain-signaling CSs, pain-CRs during acquisition only emerged within the neutral-film condition. When participants were re-exposed to CSs during MTT, self-reported-pain-CRs during the neutral-film condition and, though more uncertain, NPS-CRs during the aversive-film condition persisted. Importantly, participants with stronger pain-CRs showed a greater probability and severity of experiencing spontaneous pain intrusions during daily-life. Our data support that pain can emerge as a CR with emotional and sensory components. Classical conditioning presents a possible mechanism explaining pain-intrusions, and more broadly, pain experienced without nociceptive input.
Collapse
|
9
|
Weik E, Neuenschwander R, Jensen K, Oberlander TF, Tipper C. Placebo and nocebo effects in youth: subjective thermal discomfort can be modulated by a conditioning paradigm utilizing mental states of low and high self-efficacy. Br J Pain 2021; 16:60-70. [PMID: 35111315 PMCID: PMC8801682 DOI: 10.1177/20494637211020042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Conditioning is a key mechanism of placebo and nocebo effects in adults, but little is known about these effects in youth. This study investigated whether personalized verbal cues evoking a sense of high or low self-efficacy can induce conditioned placebo and nocebo effects on subjective discomfort of noxious heat in youth. Methods: In a structured interview, 26 adolescents (13–18 years) described personal situations in which they experienced a sense of high, low or neutral self-efficacy. Participants were then asked to recall these memories during a conditioning paradigm, in which a high thermal stimulus applied to the forearm was repeatedly paired with a low self-efficacy cue and a low thermal stimulus with a high self-efficacy cue. In a testing phase, high, low and neutral self-efficacy cues were paired with the same moderate temperature. We hypothesized that conditioned high and low self-efficacy cues would induce conditioned placebo and nocebo responses to moderate temperatures. Results: Moderate temperatures were rated as more uncomfortable when paired with the conditioned low compared with the neutral self-efficacy cue (nocebo effect). While in the whole-group analysis, there was no significant difference between ratings of moderate thermal stimuli paired with high compared with neutral self-efficacy cues (placebo effect), a sub-group of participants with a greater range of emotional valence between high and neutral self-efficacy cues revealed a significant placebo effect. The strength of the nocebo effect was associated with higher anxiety and lower hope. Conclusion: Conditioned associations using internal self-efficacy states can change subjective discomfort of thermal sensations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ella Weik
- Department of Psychiatry, BC Mental Health and Addictions Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Regula Neuenschwander
- Department of Pediatrics, BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Karin Jensen
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tim F Oberlander
- Department of Pediatrics, BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Christine Tipper
- Department of Psychiatry, BC Mental Health and Addictions Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Barnes K, Rottman BM, Colagiuri B. The placebo effect: To explore or to exploit? Cognition 2021; 214:104753. [PMID: 34023671 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
How people choose between options with differing outcomes (explore-exploit) is a central question to understanding human behaviour. However, the standard explore-exploit paradigm relies on gamified tasks with low-stake outcomes. Consequently, little is known about decision making for biologically-relevant stimuli. Here, we combined placebo and explore-exploit paradigms to examine detection and selection of the most effective treatment in a pain model. During conditioning, where 'optimal' and 'suboptimal' sham-treatments were paired with a reduction in electrical pain stimulation, participants learnt which treatment most successfully reduced pain. Modelling participant responses revealed three important findings. First, participants' choices reflected both directed and random exploration. Second, expectancy modulated pain - indicative of recursive placebo effects. Third, individual differences in terms of expectancy during conditioning predicted placebo effects during a subsequent test phase. These findings reveal directed and random exploration when the outcome is biologically-relevant. Moreover, this research shows how placebo and explore-exploit literatures can be unified.
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Cognitive self-regulation can shape pain experience, but its effects on autonomic responses to painful events are unclear. In this study, participants (N = 41) deployed a cognitive strategy based on reappraisal and imagination to regulate pain up or down on different trials while skin conductance responses (SCRs) and electrocardiogram activity were recorded. Using a machine learning approach, we first developed stimulus-locked SCR and electrocardiogram physiological markers predictive of pain ratings. The physiological markers demonstrated high sensitivity and moderate specificity in predicting pain across 2 data sets, including an independent test data set (N = 84). When we tested the markers on the cognitive self-regulation data, we found that cognitive self-regulation had significant impacts on both pain ratings and pain-related physiology in accordance with regulatory goals. These findings suggest that self-regulation can impact autonomic nervous system responses to painful stimuli and provide pain-related autonomic profiles for future studies.
Collapse
|
12
|
Locher C, Mansour R, Koechlin H, Büchi S. Patient-appraised beneficial moments during inpatient psychiatric treatment. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:734. [PMID: 32778097 PMCID: PMC7418414 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05617-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychiatric inpatients receive a multidisciplinary treatment approach, covering psychiatry, nursing, occupational therapy, and psychology. Research findings reveal that the effectiveness of any treatment is associated with three types of factors: specific (e.g., treatment techniques), common (e.g., clinician-patient relationship, patients' expectations) and extra-therapeutic. However, there is little published research on the factors and events which inpatients themselves consider to be beneficial ('beneficial moments'). METHODS Inpatients (N = 107) of a psychiatric clinic completed a questionnaire to elicit their appraisal of beneficial moments. A qualitative content analysis was applied. The coding procedure was conducted independently by two authors. RESULTS Self-appraised beneficial moments were found in five areas: therapy-specific components (number of quotations, N = 204), positive relationships (N = 140), clinical setting and environment (N = 52), inpatients' new insights (N = 36), and factors unrelated to either therapy or the clinic (N = 30). In total, 44% of the quotations were related to specific factors, 49% to common factors, and 7% to extra-therapeutic factors. CONCLUSIONS Inpatients judge both specific and common factors as crucial for the therapeutic benefit they gain during their stay at the clinic. Our results differ from meta-analytical findings, where the impact of specific factors on symptom improvement has shown to be much smaller (i.e., 17%) than appraised by patients in our study (i.e., 44%). Our study underlines the importance of a patient-centred care approach as well as shared decision making and patient-clinician communication. For clinical practice, knowledge of inpatients' perspectives on beneficial moments is crucial in order to reinforce precisely these therapeutic components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cosima Locher
- School of Psychology, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK. .,Clinic for Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics "Hohenegg", Meilen, Switzerland. .,Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. .,Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Ramin Mansour
- Clinic for Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics "Hohenegg", Meilen, Switzerland
| | - Helen Koechlin
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stefan Büchi
- Clinic for Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics "Hohenegg", Meilen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Meulders A. Fear in the context of pain: Lessons learned from 100 years of fear conditioning research. Behav Res Ther 2020; 131:103635. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2019] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
14
|
Abstract
Pain is considered a hardwired signal of bodily disturbance belonging to a basic motivational system that urges the individual to act and to restore the body's integrity, rather than just a sensory and emotional experience. Given its eminent survival value, pain is a strong motivator for learning. Response to repeated pain increases when harm risks are high (sensitization) and decreases in the absence of such risks (habituation). Discovering relations between pain and other events provides the possibility to predict (Pavlovian conditioning) and control (operant conditioning) harmful events. Avoidance is adaptive in the short term but paradoxically may have detrimental long-term effects. Pain and pain-related responses compete with other demands in the environment. Exposure-based treatments share the aim of facilitating or restoring the pursuit of individual valued life goals in the face of persistent pain, and further improvements in pain treatment may require a paradigm shift toward more personalized approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan W S Vlaeyen
- Research Group on Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; .,Experimental Health Psychology, Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Crombez
- Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.,Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schenk LA, Colloca L. The neural processes of acquiring placebo effects through observation. Neuroimage 2019; 209:116510. [PMID: 31899287 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Learning through social observation is critical for humans. The present study investigates the neural processes underlying the acquisition of placebo effects through observational learning. We created a new functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigm where participants (n = 38, healthy, both sexes) observed a demonstrator experiencing pain relief by a placebo treatment cream and experiencing pain without a treatment (control cream), and subsequently performed the same procedure themselves. Participants demonstrated placebo hypoalgesia while they performed the procedure themselves, confirming that observational learning can lead to placebo effects. During the observational learning phase, fMRI analysis showed a modulation of the amygdalae, periaqueductal grey, temporoparietal junctions (TPJ), and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Connectivity between the DLPFC and TPJ during the observational learning task was modulated by the placebo treatment and predicted subsequent placebo effects. Mediation analysis further confirmed that the DLPFC-TPJ connectivity formally mediated the effect of the observed treatment condition on subsequent placebo effects. Additionally, pre-recorded resting state connectivity between the DLPFC and TPJ also predicted observationally-learned placebo effects. Our findings provide an understanding of the neural processes during the acquisition of placebo effects through observation and indicate a critical role for DLPFC-TPJ integration processes during observational learning of therapeutic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieven A Schenk
- Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
| | - Luana Colloca
- Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA; Departments of Anesthesiology and Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA; Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Instrumental Control Enhances Placebo Analgesia. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2019; 20:1486-1497. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
17
|
Vandael K, Meulders M, Vanden Boer C, Meulders A. The relationship between fear generalization and pain modulation: an investigation in healthy participants. Scand J Pain 2019; 20:151-165. [DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background and aims
Pain-related fear and its subsequent generalization is key to the development and maintenance of chronic pain disability. Research has shown that pain-related fear acquired through classical conditioning generalizes following a gradient, that is, novel movements that are proprioceptively similar to the original pain-associated movement elicit more fear. Studies suggest that classical conditioning can also modulate pain and conditioned fear seems to mediate this effect. However, it remains uninvestigated whether this is also the case for generalized fear.
Methods
In a voluntary joystick movement paradigm, one movement (conditioned stimulus; CS+) was followed by pain (pain-US), and another was not (CS−). Generalization to five novel movements (generalization stimuli; GSs) with varying levels of similarity to the CSs was tested when paired with an at-pain-threshold intensity stimulus (threshold-USs). We collected self-reported fear and pain, as well as eyeblink startle responses as an additional index of conditioned fear.
Results
Results showed a fear generalization gradient in the ratings, but not in the startle measures. The data did not support the idea that fear generalization mediates spreading of pain.
Conclusions
Despite the lack of effects in the current study, this is a promising novel approach to investigate pain modulation in the context of chronic pain.
Implications
This study replicates the finding that pain-related fear spreads selectively towards movements that are proprioceptively more similar to the original pain-eliciting movement. Although results did not support the idea that such generalized fear mediates spreading of pain, the study provides a promising approach to investigate pain modulation by pain-associated movements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristof Vandael
- Experimental Health Psychology, Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - Michel Meulders
- Center for Information Management, Modeling and Simulation, KU Leuven , Brussels , Belgium
- Research Group on Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven , Leuven , Belgium
| | | | - Ann Meulders
- Experimental Health Psychology, Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
- Research Group Health Psychology, KU Leuven , Leuven , Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Liu C, Chen L, Yu R. Category-based generalization of placebo and nocebo effects. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2019; 199:102894. [PMID: 31349030 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Human beings possess the adaptive ability to apply experiential knowledge to new situations. Although this generalization capability has been demonstrated in fear and reward learning, it remains unclear whether it extends to analgesic and hyperalgesic pain responses. Here, we conducted two experiments (total n = 104) to test the generalization effects of placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia. The first experiment, using a category-based conditioning paradigm in which two categories of images were used as acquisition stimuli, assessed whether pain perception can be generalized to never-seen pictures of the same category in the generalization phase. The second experiment adopted a single stimulus for each category as CS to further examine the generalization effects after learning a single exemplar. Pain ratings showed that participants reported higher pain or lower pain when the pain was preceded by novel stimuli that were conceptually similar to the previously conditioned stimuli, suggesting a generalization of analgesic and hyperalgesic pain modulation effects. These results provide novel evidence that analgesic and hyperalgesic effects on pain perception can be generalized to conceptually similar new items.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cuizhen Liu
- Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Linqiu Chen
- School of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application and Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science of Guangdong Province, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rongjun Yu
- Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bąbel P. Classical Conditioning as a Distinct Mechanism of Placebo Effects. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:449. [PMID: 31293460 PMCID: PMC6603292 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2018] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Classical conditioning was suggested as a mechanism of placebo effects in the 1950s. It was then challenged by response expectancy theory, which proposed that classical conditioning is just one of the means by which expectancies are acquired and changed. According to that account, placebo effects induced by classical conditioning are mediated by expectancies. However, in most of the previous studies, either expectancies were not measured or classical conditioning was combined with verbal suggestions. Thus, on the basis of those studies, it is not possible to conclude whether expectancies are involved in placebo effects induced by pure classical conditioning. Two lines of recent studies have challenged the idea that placebo effects induced by classical conditioning are always mediated by expectancies. First, some recent studies have shown that a hidden conditioning procedure elicits both placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia, neither of which is predicted by expectancy. Second, there are studies showing that visual cues paired with pain stimuli of high or low intensity induce both placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia when they are presented subliminally without participants' awareness. The results of both lines of studies suggest that expectancy may not always be involved in placebo effects induced by classical conditioning and that conditioning may be a distinct mechanism of placebo effects. Thus, these results support the idea that placebo effects can be learned by classical conditioning either consciously or unconsciously. However, the existing body of evidence is limited to classically conditioned placebo effects in pain, that is, placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Przemysław Bąbel
- Pain Research Group, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Meulders A. From fear of movement-related pain and avoidance to chronic pain disability: a state-of-the-art review. Curr Opin Behav Sci 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
22
|
Traxler J, Madden VJ, Moseley GL, Vlaeyen JWS. Modulating pain thresholds through classical conditioning. PeerJ 2019; 7:e6486. [PMID: 30867984 PMCID: PMC6410694 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Classical conditioning has frequently been shown to be capable of evoking fear of pain and avoidance behavior in the context of chronic pain. However, whether pain itself can be conditioned has rarely been investigated and remains a matter of debate. Therefore, the present study investigated whether pain threshold ratings can be modified by the presence of conditioned non-nociceptive sensory stimuli in healthy participant. Methods In 51 healthy volunteers, pain threshold to electrocutaneous stimuli was determined prior to participation in a simultaneous conditioning paradigm. Participants underwent an acquisition phase in which one non-painful vibrotactile stimulus (CS+) was repeatedly paired with a painful electrocutaneous stimulus, whereas a second vibrotactile stimulus of the same quality and intensity (CS−) was paired with a non-painful electrocutaneous stimulus. Stimulation was provided on the lower back with close proximity between the conditioned stimulus and the unconditioned stimulus. In the test phase, electrocutaneous stimuli at the individually-set threshold intensity were simultaneously delivered together with either a CS+ or CS−. Pain intensity ratings were obtained after each trial; expectancy ratings were obtained after each block. The primary outcome was the percentage of test stimuli that were rated as painful. Results Test stimuli were more likely to be rated as painful when they were paired with the CS+ than when they were paired with the CS−. This effect was not influenced by contingency awareness, nor by expectancies or mood states. Discussion The findings support the notion that the judgement of an event being painful or non-painful can be influenced by classical conditioning and corroborate the possible role of associative learning in the development and maintenance of chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Traxler
- Research Centre for Health Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Experimental Health Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Victoria J Madden
- Research Centre for Health Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - G Lorimer Moseley
- Body in Mind Research Group, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Johan W S Vlaeyen
- Research Centre for Health Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Experimental Health Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Locher C, Gaab J, Blease C. When a Placebo Is Not a Placebo: Problems and Solutions to the Gold Standard in Psychotherapy Research. Front Psychol 2018; 9:2317. [PMID: 30542310 PMCID: PMC6277873 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Cosima Locher
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jens Gaab
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Charlotte Blease
- Program in Placebo Studies, General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard, MA, United States.,School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jepma M, Koban L, van Doorn J, Jones M, Wager TD. Behavioural and neural evidence for self-reinforcing expectancy effects on pain. Nat Hum Behav 2018; 2:838-855. [PMID: 31558818 PMCID: PMC6768437 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0455-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Beliefs and expectations often persist despite evidence to the contrary. Here we examine two potential mechanisms underlying such 'self-reinforcing' expectancy effects in the pain domain: modulation of perception and biased learning. In two experiments, cues previously associated with symbolic representations of high or low temperatures preceded painful heat. We examined trial-to-trial dynamics in participants' expected pain, reported pain and brain activity. Subjective and neural pain responses assimilated towards cue-based expectations, and pain responses in turn predicted subsequent expectations, creating a positive dynamic feedback loop. Furthermore, we found evidence for a confirmation bias in learning: higher- and lower-than-expected pain triggered greater expectation updating for high- and low-pain cues, respectively. Individual differences in this bias were reflected in the updating of pain-anticipatory brain activity. Computational modelling provided converging evidence that expectations influence both perception and learning. Together, perceptual assimilation and biased learning promote self-reinforcing expectations, helping to explain why beliefs can be resistant to change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke Jepma
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience and Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
| | - Leonie Koban
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience and Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Johnny van Doorn
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Matt Jones
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience and Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Tor D Wager
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience and Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hein G, Engelmann JB, Tobler PN. Pain relief provided by an outgroup member enhances analgesia. Proc Biol Sci 2018; 285:rspb.2018.0501. [PMID: 30257910 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Pain feels different in different social contexts, yet the mechanisms behind social pain modulation remain poorly understood. To elucidate the impact of social context on pain processing, we investigated how group membership, one of the most important social context factors, shapes pain relief behaviourally and neurally in humans undergoing functional neuroimaging. Participants repeatedly received pain relief from a member of their own group (ingroup treatment) or a member of a disliked outgroup (outgroup treatment). We observed a decrease in pain ratings and anterior insula (AI) pain responses after outgroup treatment, but not after ingroup treatment. Moreover, path analyses revealed that the outgroup treatment induced a stronger relief learning in the AI, which in turn altered pain processing, in particular if the participant entered the treatment with a negative impression toward the outgroup individual. The finding of enhanced analgesia after outgroup treatment is relevant for intergroup clinical settings. More generally, we found that group membership affects pain responses through neural learning and we thus elucidate one possible mechanism through which social context impacts pain processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grit Hein
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic and Psychotherapy, Translational Social Neuroscience Unit, University of Wurzburg, Wurzburg 97080, Germany
| | - Jan B Engelmann
- Center for Research in Experimental Economics and Political Decision Making (CREED), Amsterdam School of Economics, and Amsterdam Brain and Cognition (ABC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1001, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe N Tobler
- Department of Economics, Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research, University of Zurich, Zurich 8006, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Damien J, Colloca L, Bellei-Rodriguez CÉ, Marchand S. Pain Modulation: From Conditioned Pain Modulation to Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Experimental and Clinical Pain. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF NEUROBIOLOGY 2018; 139:255-296. [PMID: 30146050 DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Accumulating evidence reveal important applications of endogenous pain modulation assessment in healthy controls and in patients in clinical settings, as dysregulations in the balance of pain modulatory circuits may facilitate pain and promote chronification of pain. This article reviews data on pain modulation, focusing on the mechanisms and translational aspects of pain modulation from conditioned pain modulation (CPM) to placebo and nocebo effects in experimental and clinical pain. The specific roles of expectations, learning, neural and neurophysiological mechanisms of the central nervous system are briefly reviewed herein. The interaction between CPM and placebo systems in pain inhibitory pathways is highly relevant in the clinic and in randomized controlled trials yet remains to be clarified. Examples of clinical implications of CPM and its relationship to placebo and nocebo effects are provided. A greater understanding of the role of pain modulation in various pain states can help characterize the manifestation and development of chronic pain and assist in predicting the response to pain-relieving treatments. Placebo and nocebo effects, intrinsic to every treatment, can be used to develop personalized therapeutic approaches that improve clinical outcomes while limiting unwanted effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janie Damien
- Research Center of the Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Luana Colloca
- Department of Pain Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States; Departments of Psychiatry and Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Carmen-Édith Bellei-Rodriguez
- Research Center of the Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Serge Marchand
- Research Center of the Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS), Montréal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Placebo Effect: Theory, Mechanisms and Teleological Roots. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF NEUROBIOLOGY 2018; 139:233-253. [PMID: 30146049 DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Why pain can be relieved with placebos is heavily debated. The term "placebo effect," implies that the placebo treatment induces pain relief which is imprecise because it is the mental cueing to the context of treatment and not the placebo itself that can reduce pain. This essay reverts to fundamentals of perception that have been used to explain how context generates predictions that can in turn effect the process of processing, organizing and interpreting of sensory inputs received from the periphery. We reinterpret placebo effect as a neurobiological phenomenon that occurs through the process of reward and aversive learning. The brain uses learnt information to generate predictions. The perceptual processes adjust the experience of pain to fit with the predictions generated from prior information. Placebo effect is thus understandably a result of the expectations and mental states that result from engaging in the process of treatment. These processes have teleological roots in ancient medicine and are the context that produces these responses is transforming with the evolution of modern medicine. Thus, when placebo effect is observed, the potent agent that induces pain reduction is not the placebo itself, but the mental cueing to the context of taking treatment.
Collapse
|
28
|
Koban L, Jepma M, Geuter S, Wager TD. What's in a word? How instructions, suggestions, and social information change pain and emotion. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2018; 81:29-42. [PMID: 29173508 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2016] [Revised: 02/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Instructions, suggestions, and other types of social information can have powerful effects on pain and emotion. Prominent examples include observational learning, social influence, placebo, and hypnosis. These different phenomena and their underlying brain mechanisms have been studied in partially separate literatures, which we discuss, compare, and integrate in this review. Converging findings from these literatures suggest that (1) instructions and social information affect brain systems associated with the generation of pain and emotion, and with reinforcement learning, and that (2) these changes are mediated by alterations in prefrontal systems responsible for top-down control and the generation of affective meaning. We argue that changes in expectation and appraisal, a process of assessing personal meaning and implications for wellbeing, are two potential key mediators of the effects of instructions and social information on affective experience. Finally, we propose a tentative model of how prefrontal regions, especially dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex may regulate affective processing based on instructions and socially transmitted expectations more broadly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Koban
- Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, United States; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, United States.
| | - Marieke Jepma
- Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, The Netherlands
| | - Stephan Geuter
- Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, United States; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, United States
| | - Tor D Wager
- Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, United States; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Koban L, Kusko D, Wager TD. Generalization of learned pain modulation depends on explicit learning. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2018; 184:75-84. [PMID: 29025685 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2016] [Revised: 08/28/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The experience of pain is strongly influenced by contextual and socio-affective factors, including learning from previous experiences. Pain is typically perceived as more intense when preceded by a conditioned cue (CSHIGH) that has previously been associated with higher pain intensities, compared to cues associated with lower intensities (CSLOW). In three studies (total N=134), we tested whether this learned pain modulation generalizes to perceptually similar cues (Studies 1 and 2) and conceptually similar cues (Study 3). The results showed that participants report higher pain when heat stimulation was preceded by novel stimuli that were either perceptually (Studies 1 and 2) or conceptually (Study 3) similar to the previously conditioned CSHIGH. In all three studies, the strength of this generalization effect was strongly correlated with individual differences in explicitly learned expectations. Together, these findings suggest an important role of conscious expectations and higher-order conceptual inference during generalization of learned pain modulation. We discuss implications for the understanding of placebo and nocebo effects as well as for chronic pain and anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Koban
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, United States; Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, United States.
| | - Daniel Kusko
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, United States; Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, United States
| | - Tor D Wager
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, United States; Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
The Underestimated Significance of Conditioning in Placebo Hypoalgesia and Nocebo Hyperalgesia. Pain Res Manag 2018; 2018:6841985. [PMID: 29670678 PMCID: PMC5833150 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6841985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Placebo and nocebo effects are intriguing phenomena in pain perception with important implications for clinical research and practice because they can alleviate or increase pain. According to current theoretical accounts, these effects can be shaped by verbal suggestions, social observational learning, and classical conditioning and are necessarily mediated by explicit expectation. In this review, we focus on the contribution of conditioning in the induction of placebo hypoalgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia and present accumulating evidence that conditioning independent from explicit expectation can cause these effects. Especially studies using subliminal stimulus presentation and implicit conditioning (i.e., without contingency awareness) that bypass the development of explicit expectation suggest that conditioning without explicit expectation can lead to placebo and nocebo effects in pain perception. Because only few studies have investigated clinical samples, the picture seems less clear when it comes to patient populations with chronic pain. However, conditioning appears to be a promising means to optimize treatment. In order to get a better insight into the mechanisms of placebo and nocebo effects in pain and the possible benefits of conditioning compared to explicit expectation, future studies should carefully distinguish both methods of induction.
Collapse
|
31
|
Schafer SM, Geuter S, Wager TD. Mechanisms of placebo analgesia: A dual-process model informed by insights from cross-species comparisons. Prog Neurobiol 2018; 160:101-122. [PMID: 29108801 PMCID: PMC5747994 DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Revised: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Placebo treatments are pharmacologically inert, but are known to alleviate symptoms across a variety of clinical conditions. Associative learning and cognitive expectations both play important roles in placebo responses, however we are just beginning to understand how interactions between these processes lead to powerful effects. Here, we review the psychological principles underlying placebo effects and our current understanding of their brain bases, focusing on studies demonstrating both the importance of cognitive expectations and those that demonstrate expectancy-independent associative learning. To account for both forms of placebo analgesia, we propose a dual-process model in which flexible, contextually driven cognitive schemas and attributions guide associative learning processes that produce stable, long-term placebo effects. According to this model, the placebo-induction paradigms with the most powerful effects are those that combine reinforcement (e.g., the experience of reduced pain after placebo treatment) with suggestions and context cues that disambiguate learning by attributing perceived benefit to the placebo. Using this model as a conceptual scaffold, we review and compare neurobiological systems identified in both human studies of placebo analgesia and behavioral pain modulation in rodents. We identify substantial overlap between the circuits involved in human placebo analgesia and those that mediate multiple forms of context-based modulation of pain behavior in rodents, including forebrain-brainstem pathways and opioid and cannabinoid systems in particular. This overlap suggests that placebo effects are part of a set of adaptive mechanisms for shaping nociceptive signaling based on its information value and anticipated optimal response in a given behavioral context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott M Schafer
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
| | - Stephan Geuter
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USA; Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, 344 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Tor D Wager
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USA; Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, 344 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Świder K, Wronka E, Oosterman JM, van Rijn CM, Jongsma MLA. Influence of transient spatial attention on the P3 component and perception of painful and non-painful electric stimuli in crossed and uncrossed hands positions. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0182616. [PMID: 28873414 PMCID: PMC5584947 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2016] [Accepted: 07/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent reports show that focusing attention on the location where pain is expected can enhance its perception. Moreover, crossing the hands over the body’s midline is known to impair the ability to localise stimuli and decrease tactile and pain sensations in healthy participants. The present study investigated the role of transient spatial attention on the perception of painful and non-painful electrical stimuli in conditions in which a match or a mismatch was induced between skin-based and external frames of reference (uncrossed and crossed hands positions, respectively). We measured the subjective experience (Numerical Rating Scale scores) and the electrophysiological response elicited by brief electric stimuli by analysing the P3 component of Event-Related Potentials (ERPs). Twenty-two participants underwent eight painful and eight non-painful stimulus blocks. The electrical stimuli were applied to either the left or the right hand, held in either a crossed or uncrossed position. Each stimulus was preceded by a direction cue (leftward or rightward arrow). In 80% of the trials, the arrow correctly pointed to the spatial regions where the stimulus would appear (congruent cueing). Our results indicated that congruent cues resulted in increased pain NRS scores compared to incongruent ones. For non-painful stimuli such an effect was observed only in the uncrossed hands position. For both non-painful and painful stimuli the P3 peak amplitudes were higher and occurred later for incongruently cued stimuli compared to congruent ones. However, we found that crossing the hands substantially reduced the cueing effect of the P3 peak amplitudes elicited by painful stimuli. Taken together, our results showed a strong influence of transient attention manipulations on the NRS ratings and on the brain activity. Our results also suggest that hand position may modulate the strength of the cueing effect, although differences between painful and non-painful stimuli exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Świder
- Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition & Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Eligiusz Wronka
- Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
| | - Joukje M. Oosterman
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition & Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Clementina M. van Rijn
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition & Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marijtje L. A. Jongsma
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition & Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Geuter S, Koban L, Wager TD. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Placebo Effects: Concepts, Predictions, and Physiology. Annu Rev Neurosci 2017; 40:167-188. [PMID: 28399689 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Placebos have been used ubiquitously throughout the history of medicine. Expectations and associative learning processes are important psychological determinants of placebo effects, but their underlying brain mechanisms are only beginning to be understood. We examine the brain systems underlying placebo effects on pain, autonomic, and immune responses. The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), insula, amygdala, hypothalamus, and periaqueductal gray emerge as central brain structures underlying placebo effects. We argue that the vmPFC is a core element of a network that represents structured relationships among concepts, providing a substrate for expectations and a conception of the situation-the self in context-that is crucial for placebo effects. Such situational representations enable multidimensional predictions, or priors, that are combined with incoming sensory information to construct percepts and shape motivated behavior. They influence experience and physiology via descending pathways to physiological effector systems, including the spinal cord and other peripheral organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Geuter
- Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309; , , .,Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309
| | - Leonie Koban
- Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309; , , .,Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309
| | - Tor D Wager
- Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309; , , .,Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ashar YK, Chang LJ, Wager TD. Brain Mechanisms of the Placebo Effect: An Affective Appraisal Account. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2017; 13:73-98. [PMID: 28375723 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Placebos are sham medical treatments. Nonetheless, they can have substantial effects on clinical outcomes. Placebos depend on a person's psychological and brain responses to the treatment context, which influence appraisals of future well-being. Appraisals are flexible cognitive evaluations of the personal meaning of events and situations that can directly impact symptoms and physiology. They also shape associative learning processes by guiding what is learned from experience. Appraisals are supported by a core network of brain regions associated with the default mode network involved in self-generated emotion, self-evaluation, thinking about the future, social cognition, and valuation of rewards and punishment. Placebo treatments for acute pain and a range of clinical conditions engage this same network of regions, suggesting that placebos affect behavior and physiology by changing how a person evaluates their future well-being and the personal significance of their symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoni K Ashar
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309
| | - Luke J Chang
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
| | - Tor D Wager
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309.,Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309;
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Quantifying cerebral contributions to pain beyond nociception. Nat Commun 2017; 8:14211. [PMID: 28195170 PMCID: PMC5316889 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2016] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Cerebral processes contribute to pain beyond the level of nociceptive input and mediate psychological and behavioural influences. However, cerebral contributions beyond nociception are not yet well characterized, leading to a predominant focus on nociception when studying pain and developing interventions. Here we use functional magnetic resonance imaging combined with machine learning to develop a multivariate pattern signature-termed the stimulus intensity independent pain signature-1 (SIIPS1)-that predicts pain above and beyond nociceptive input in four training data sets (Studies 1-4, N=137). The SIIPS1 includes patterns of activity in nucleus accumbens, lateral prefrontal and parahippocampal cortices, and other regions. In cross-validated analyses of Studies 1-4 and in two independent test data sets (Studies 5-6, N=46), SIIPS1 responses explain variation in trial-by-trial pain ratings not captured by a previous fMRI-based marker for nociceptive pain. In addition, SIIPS1 responses mediate the pain-modulating effects of three psychological manipulations of expectations and perceived control. The SIIPS1 provides an extensible characterization of cerebral contributions to pain and specific brain targets for interventions.
Collapse
|
36
|
Vlaeyen JW, Morley S, Crombez G. The experimental analysis of the interruptive, interfering, and identity-distorting effects of chronic pain. Behav Res Ther 2016; 86:23-34. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2016] [Revised: 08/17/2016] [Accepted: 08/22/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
37
|
Abstract
Competition for prioritization between basic motivational states, such as pain and thirst, is thought to inhibit the currently nonprioritized state. We show that thirst can reduce pain in humans, whereas at the same time enhance pain through increased negative mood. Introduction: Although the motivation to avoid injury and pain is central to human and animal behavior, this goal compete priority with other homeostatic goals. Animal studies have shown that competing motivational states, such as thirst, reduce pain. However, such states may also induce negative mood, which in humans has been found to increase pain. These opposing effects complicate study of the effects of motivational states in humans. Objectives: To evaluate concurrent effects of motivational state competition and mood on pain ratings. Methods: We compared a thirst challenge against a control group and measured thirst and mood as potential mediators. Pain induced through contact heat stimulation on the left forearm and was tested at 3 time points: before group randomization, after thirst induction, and after rehydration. Results: Overall, the thirst group reported more pain when thirsty compared with baseline and controls. Mediation analyses showed evidence for two opposing effects. First, the thirst challenge increased negative mood and thirstiness, which was related to increased pain. Second, the thirst challenge produced a direct, pain-reducing effect. Conclusion: Competing motivational states reduce pain but also induce concurrent mood changes that can mask motivational state-related effects.
Collapse
|