A controlled trial of pulse cyclophosphamide versus pulse methylprednisolone in severe lupus nephritis

Immunosuppressive treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis

BACKGROUND

Cyclophosphamide, in combination with corticosteroids, has been first-line treatment for inducing disease remission for proliferative lupus nephritis, reducing death at five years from over 50% in the 1950s and 1960s to less than 10% in recent years. Several treatment strategies designed to improve remission rates and minimise toxicity have become available. Treatments, including mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and calcineurin inhibitors, alone and in combination, may have equivalent or improved rates of remission, lower toxicity (less alopecia and ovarian failure) and uncertain effects on death, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and infection. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004 and updated in 2012.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to assess the evidence and evaluate the benefits and harms of different immunosuppressive treatments in people with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis. The following questions relating to management of proliferative lupus nephritis were addressed: 1) Are new immunosuppressive agents superior to or as effective as cyclophosphamide plus corticosteroids? 2) Which agents, dosages, routes of administration and duration of therapy should be used? 3) Which toxicities occur with the different treatment regimens?

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register up to 2 March 2018 with support from the Cochrane Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Specialised Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing any immunosuppressive treatment for biopsy-proven class III, IV, V+III and V+VI lupus nephritis in adult or paediatric patients were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were abstracted and the risks of bias were assessed independently by two authors. Dichotomous outcomes were calculated as risk ratio (RR) and measures on continuous scales calculated as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcomes were death (all causes) and complete disease remission for induction therapy and disease relapse for maintenance therapy. Evidence certainty was determined using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

In this review update, 26 new studies were identified, to include 74 studies involving 5175 participants overall. Twenty-nine studies included children under the age of 18 years with lupus nephritis, however only two studies exclusively examined the treatment of lupus nephritis in patients less than 18 years of age.Induction therapy Sixty-seven studies (4791 participants; median 12 months duration (range 2.5 to 48 months)) reported induction therapy. The effects of all treatment strategies on death (all causes) and ESKD were uncertain (very low certainty evidence) as this outcome occurred very infrequently. Compared with intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide, MMF may have increased complete disease remission (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.42; low certainty evidence), although the range of effects includes the possibility of little or no difference.Compared to IV cyclophosphamide, MMF is probably associated with decreased alopecia (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.46; 170 less (129 less to 194 less) per 1000 people) (moderate certainty evidence), increased diarrhoea (RR 2.42, 95% CI 1.64 to 3.58; 142 more (64 more to 257 more) per 1000 people) (moderate certainty evidence) and may have made little or no difference to major infection (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.54; 2 less (38 less to 62 more) per 1000 people) (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain if MMF decreased ovarian failure compared to IV cyclophosphamide because the certainty of the evidence was very low (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.06 to 2.18; 26 less (39 less to 49 more) per 1000 people). Studies were not generally designed to measure ESKD.MMF combined with tacrolimus may have increased complete disease remission (RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.07 to 5.30; 336 more (17 to 1048 more) per 1000 people (low certainty evidence) compared with IV cyclophosphamide, however the effects on alopecia, diarrhoea, ovarian failure, and major infection remain uncertain. Compared to standard of care, the effects of biologics on most outcomes were uncertain because of low to very low certainty of evidence.Maintenance therapyNine studies (767 participants; median 30 months duration (range 6 to 63 months)) reported maintenance therapy. In maintenance therapy, disease relapse is probably increased with azathioprine compared with MMF (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.55; 114 more (30 to 236 more) per 1000 people (moderate certainty evidence). Multiple other interventions were compared as maintenance therapy, but patient-outcome data were sparse leading to imprecise estimates.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this review update, studies assessing treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis were not designed to assess death (all causes) or ESKD. MMF may lead to increased complete disease remission compared with IV cyclophosphamide, with an acceptable adverse event profile, although evidence certainty was low and included the possibility of no difference. Calcineurin combined with lower dose MMF may improve induction of disease remission compared with IV cyclophosphamide, but the comparative safety profile of these therapies is uncertain. Azathioprine may increase disease relapse as maintenance therapy compared with MMF.

Risk of adverse events from different drugs for SLE: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective

The comparative safety of immunosuppressive drugs, biologicals and glucocorticoids (GC) for patients with SLE remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the specific side effects of the available SLE drugs in this population of patients.

Methods

Electronic databases were systematically searched through September 2017 for randomised trials in patients with SLE. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and withdrawal related to adverse events (AEs). We performed a random-effects network meta-analysis to obtain estimates for primary and secondary outcomes and presented these estimates as ORs with 95% CIs.

Results

Forty-four studies comprising 9898 participants were included in the network meta-analysis. No drug regimen was considered to be safer for reducing all-cause mortality. However, compared with cyclophosphamide, azathioprine (OR 3.04, 95% CI (1.44 to 6.42)) and cyclosporine (OR 3.28, 95% CI (1.04 to 10.35)) were significantly less safety in AE-related withdrawals, and GC was ranked lowest and led to higher withdrawal rates. Tacrolimus (TAC) was ranked high and showed a benefit in many outcomes. Biologicals and chloroquine also showed good safety in all of the available outcomes, while the beneficial effects of other immunosuppressive drugs were not substantial in different types of serious adverse events.

Conclusions

TAC is the safest strategy for patients with SLE. Biologicals and chloroquine are also fairly safe for patients with SLE. The use of other immunosuppressive drugs and GC needs to be balanced against the potential harms of different types of AEs, and the practical safety of drug combinations still requires further trials to evaluate.

Systematic Review and the External Validity of Randomized Controlled Trials in Lupus Nephritis

Introduction

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for assessing treatment efficacy. However, sampling bias can affect the generalization of results to routine clinical practice. Here we assessed whether patients with lupus nephritis (LN) seen in routine clinical practice would have satisfied entry criteria to the major published RCTs in LN.

Methods

A systematic literature search from January 1974 to May 2015 was carried out, identifying all RCTs investigating LN induction treatment. Patients diagnosed with proliferative or membranous LN between 1995 and 2013 were identified from the Barts Lupus Centre database; baseline characteristics were compared with each RCT’s entry criteria to assess hypothetical inclusion or exclusion.

Results

Of 363 articles, 33 RCTs met inclusion criteria. Of 137 patients newly diagnosed with LN (111 with proliferative/mixed proliferative and 26 with pure membranous LN), 32% would have been excluded from RCT entry (range 8%–73%). The main reasons for exclusion would have been too severe disease, too mild disease, or prior immunosuppressant use, which were exclusion criteria in 26, 20, and 22 RCTs, respectively. A total of 27 patients with LN (20%) were re-biopsied due to flare; 68% of these would have been ineligible to enter RCTs.

Conclusion

Published RCTs do not truly reflect the heterogeneity of patients with LN in routine practice at our lupus center. The external validity of RCTs could be improved by including more representative patient cohorts. RCTs should be used as a guide but consideration should be given to similarities between individual patients and the characteristics of the trial cohorts before treatment decisions being made.

Induction and Maintenance Immunosuppression Treatment of Proliferative Lupus Nephritis: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

Intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide has been first-line treatment for inducing disease remission in lupus nephritis. The comparative efficacy and toxicity of newer agents such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and calcineurin inhibitors are uncertain.

STUDY DESIGN

Network meta-analysis.

SETTING & POPULATION

Patients with proliferative lupus nephritis.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

Randomized trials of immunosuppression to induce or maintain disease remission.

INTERVENTIONS

IV cyclophosphamide, oral cyclophosphamide, MMF, calcineurin inhibitor, plasma exchange, rituximab, or azathioprine, alone or in combination.

OUTCOMES

Complete remission, end-stage kidney disease, all-cause mortality, doubling of serum creatinine level, relapse, and adverse events.

RESULTS

53 studies involving 4,222 participants were eligible. Induction and maintenance treatments were administered for 12 (IQR, 6-84) and 25 (IQR, 12-48) months, respectively. There was no evidence of different effects between therapies on all-cause mortality, doubling of serum creatinine level, or end-stage kidney disease. Compared to IV cyclophosphamide, the most effective treatments to induce remission in moderate- to high-quality evidence were combined MMF and calcineurin inhibitor therapy, calcineurin inhibitors, and MMF (ORs were 2.69 [95% CI, 1.74-4.16], 1.86 [95% CI, 1.05-3.30], and 1.54 [95% CI, 1.04-2.30], respectively). MMF was significantly less likely than IV cyclophosphamide to cause alopecia (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.12-0.36), and MMF combined with calcineurin inhibitor therapy was less likely to cause ovarian failure (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07-0.93). Regimens generally had similar odds of major infection. MMF was the most effective strategy to maintain remission.

LIMITATIONS

Outcome definitions not standardized, short duration of follow-up, and possible confounding by previous or subsequent therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence for induction therapy for lupus nephritis is inconclusive based on treatment effects on all-cause mortality, doubling of serum creatinine level, and end-stage kidney disease. MMF, calcineurin inhibitors, or their combination were most effective for inducing remission compared to IV cyclophosphamide, while conferring similar or lower treatment toxicity. MMF was the most effective maintenance therapy.

Treatments for Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review and Network Metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare benefits and harms of lupus nephritis (LN) induction and maintenance treatments.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and Bayesian network metaanalyses of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of immunosuppressive drugs or corticosteroids (CS) in LN. OR and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were calculated.

RESULTS

There were 65 RCT that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Significantly lower risk of endstage renal disease (ESRD; 17 studies) was seen with cyclophosphamide (CYC; OR 0.49, 95% CrI 0.25-0.92) or CYC + azathioprine (AZA; OR 0.18, 95% CrI 0.05-0.57) compared with standard-dose CS, and with high-dose (HD) CYC (OR 0.16, 95% CrI 0.03-0.61) or CYC + AZA (OR 0.10, 95% CrI 0.03-0.34) compared with HD CS. HD CS was associated with higher risk of ESRD compared with CYC (OR 3.59, 95% CrI 1.30-9.86), AZA (OR 2.93, 95% CrI 1.08-8.10), or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; OR 7.05, 95% CrI 1.66-31.91). Compared with CS, a significantly higher proportion of patients had renal response (14 studies) when treated with CYC (OR 1.98, 95% CrI 1.13-3.52), MMF (OR 2.42, 95% CrI 1.27-4.74), or tacrolimus (TAC; OR 4.20, 95% CrI 1.29-13.68). No differences were noted for the risk of malignancy (15 studies). The risk of herpes zoster (17 studies) was as follows: OR (95% CrI) MMF versus CS 4.38 (1.02-23.87), CYC versus CS 6.64 (1.97-25.71), TAC versus CS 9.11 (1.13-70.99), and CYC + AZA versus CS 8.46 (1.99-43.61).

CONCLUSION

Renal benefits and the risk of herpes zoster were higher for immunosuppressive drugs versus CS. Data on relative and absolute differences are now available, which can be incorporated into patient-physician discussions related to systemic lupus erythematosus medication use.

Calcineurin inhibitors may be a reasonable alternative to cyclophosphamide in the induction treatment of active lupus nephritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Although the accepted standard of care during the induction treatment of active lupus nephritis (LN) has been cyclophosphamide (CYC), recent trials suggest that calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), which include cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus (TAC), may be just as, or even more, effective and less toxic than CYC. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the clinical effects of CNIs on active LN compared with those of CYC. In the present study, clinical trials that compared CNIs with CYC in the induction therapy of active LN were searched in the Cochrane Library, Ovid and PubMed databases. The clinical data on renal remission and side-effects were collected and analyzed. The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. As a result, six controlled trials involving 265 patients were included in the meta-analysis, four of which compared TAC (treatment group) with CYC (control group), and the other two compared CsA (treatment group) with CYC (control group). CNIs were superior to CYC for higher complete remission (RR=1.56, 95% CI 1.14-2.15, Z=2.74, P=0.006) and better overall response/total remission (RR=1.23, 95% CI 1.07-1.42, Z=2.87, P=0.004) and had fewer side-effects. Among the CNIs, TAC demonstrated more favorable results than CsA. Therefore, it was concluded that CNIs may be a reasonable alternative to CYC in the induction treatment of active LN. However, large-scale, multicenter, well-designed clinical trials should be adopted to further confirm this conclusion.

Cyclophosphamide versus methylprednisolone for treating neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is complex and it is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Management of nervous system manifestations of SLE remains unsatisfactory. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2000 and previously updated in 2006.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone in the treatment of neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, SCOPUS and WHO up to and including June 2012. We sought additional articles through handsearching in relevant journals as well as contact with experts. There were no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials that compared cyclophosphamide to methylprednisolone in patients with SLE of any age and gender and presenting with any kind of neuropsychiatric manifestations.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted, assessed and cross-checked data. We produced a 'Summary of findings' table. We presented dichotomous data as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

We did not include any new trials in this update. One randomised controlled trial of 32 patients is included. Concerning risk of bias, generation of the allocation sequence was at low risk; however, allocation concealment, blinding and selective reporting were at high risk. Treatment response, defined as 20% improvement from basal conditions by clinical, serological and specific neurological measures, was found in 94.7% (18/19) of patients using cyclophosphamide compared with 46.2% (6/13) in the methylprednisolone group at 24 months (RR 2.05, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.73). This was statistically significant and the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of treatment response is three. We found no statistically significant differences between the groups in damage index measurements (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)). The median SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) rating favoured the cyclophosphamide group. Cyclophosphamide use was associated with a reduction in prednisone requirements. All the patients in the cyclophosphamide group had electroencephalographic improvement but there was no statistically significant difference in decrease between groups in the number of monthly seizures. No statistically significant differences in adverse effects, including mortality, were reported between the groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review found one randomised controlled trial with a small number of patients in the different clinical subgroups of neurological manifestation. There is very low-quality evidence that cyclophosphamide is more effective in reducing symptoms of neuropsychiatric involvement in SLE compared with methylprednisolone. However, properly designed randomised controlled trials that involve large numbers of individuals, with explicit clinical and laboratory diagnostic criteria, sufficient duration of follow-up and description of all relevant outcome measures, are necessary to guide practice. As we did not find any new trials to include in this review at update, the conclusions of the review did not change.

Treatment for lupus nephritis

BACKGROUND

Cyclophosphamide, in combination with corticosteroids has been used to induce remission in proliferative lupus nephritis, the most common kidney manifestation of the multisystem disease, systemic lupus erythematosus. Cyclophosphamide therapy has reduced mortality from over 70% in the 1950s and 1960s to less than 10% in recent years. Cyclophosphamide combined with corticosteroids preserves kidney function but is only partially effective and may cause ovarian failure, infection and bladder toxicity. Several new agents, including mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), suggest reduced toxicity with equivalent rates of remission. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of different immunosuppressive treatments in biopsy-proven proliferative lupus nephritis.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, we searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register (up to 15 April 2012) through contact with the Trials' Search Coordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing any treatments for biopsy-proven lupus nephritis in both adult and paediatric patients with class III, IV, V +III and V +IV lupus nephritis were included. All immunosuppressive treatments were considered.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were abstracted and quality assessed independently by two authors, with differences resolved by discussion. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as risk ratio (RR) and measurements on continuous scales reported as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 50 RCTs involving 2846 participants. Of these, 45 studies (2559 participants) investigated induction therapy, and six studies (514 participants), considered maintenance therapy.Compared with intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide, MMF was as effective in achieving stable kidney function (5 studies, 523 participants: RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.18) and complete remission of proteinuria (6 studies, 686 participants: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.58). No differences in mortality (7 studies, 710 participants: RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.98) or major infection (6 studies, 683 participants: RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.68) were observed. A significant reduction in ovarian failure (2 studies, 498 participants: RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.80) and alopecia (2 studies, 522 participants: RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.86) was observed with MMF. In maintenance therapy, the risk of renal relapse (3 studies, 371 participants: RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.71) was significantly higher with azathioprine compared with MMF. Multiple other interventions were compared but outcome data were relatively sparse. Overall study quality was variable. The internal validity of the design, conduct and analysis of the included RCTs was difficult to assess in some studies because of the omission of important methodological details. No study adequately reported all domains of the risk of bias assessment so that elements of internal bias may be present.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

MMF is as effective as cyclophosphamide in inducing remission in lupus nephritis, but is safer with a lower risk of ovarian failure. MMF is more effective than azathioprine in maintenance therapy for preventing relapse with no increase in clinically important side effects. Adequately powered trials with long term follow-up are required to more accurately define the risks and eventual harms of specific treatment regimens.

Investigation of pathological and clinical features of lupus nephritis in 73 autopsied cases with systemic lupus erythematosus

The aims of this study were to analyze the clinical and pathological features of lupus nephritis (LN) and examine the association between these features and pathological condition, treatment, and prognosis. Of the 177 systemic lupus erythematosus patients who died while receiving inpatient care at Juntendo University Hospital between 1960 and 2001, we investigated the clinical features, treatment, and pathological features of 73 of these who underwent pathological autopsy and had a clear medical history. We divided these cases into two groups, i.e., those up to 1979 (Group A) and those during and after 1980 (Group B) in order to investigate changes in tendencies by age. We also divided the cases into three groups by time interval between diagnosis and death to investigate long-term prognosis. Uremia was the direct cause of death in 38.9% of cases in Group A and only 10.8% of cases in Group B. Pathological features showed a tendency to change to a sclerotic lesion as the duration of the disorder became longer. Uremia attributable to LN was the direct cause of death in relatively fewer cases, although it is still found in the majority of LN cases and remains a problem requiring stringent management. The treatment of sclerotic lesions may be an issue that needs further attention.

Mycophenolate mofetil is as efficacious as, but safer than, cyclophosphamide in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

OBJECTIVE

Since mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as an immunosuppressant for treating proliferative lupus nephritis, the role of cyclophosphamide (CYC)-containing regimens is being challenged. Efficacy data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and previous meta-analyses comparing these two agents for treating lupus nephritis have been inconsistent as they were heterogeneous in design and of small sample size. An updated meta-analysis is therefore required.

METHODS

Publications in the English literature were searched with the keywords 'mycophenoate', 'mycophenolic', 'lupus nephritis', 'nephritis' and 'glomerulonephritis' for RCTs in electronic databases. Primary outcome was relative risk (RR) of renal remission at 6 months. Secondary outcome included RRs of mortality, development of end-stage renal failure (ESRF) and side effects. Meta-regression was performed to identify factors explaining the heterogeneity of the effect sizes.

RESULTS

Ten eligible RCTs involving 847 patients were included. MMF offers similar efficacy in inducing renal remission as CYC (RR 1.052; 95% CI 0.950, 1.166) and the risks of death (RR 0.709; 95% CI 0.373, 1.347) and ESRF (RR 0.453; 95% CI 0.183, 1.121) were comparable. Significantly fewer patients receiving MMF developed amenorrhoea (RR 0.212; 95% CI 0.094, 0.479) and leucopenia (RR 0.473; 95% CI 0.269, 0.832) while the risks of herpes infection and pneumonia tended to be lower and that of diarrhoea appeared higher in the MMF groups. Meta-regression revealed that the non-white and non-Asian ethnicities contributed significantly to the heterogeneity of the effect sizes of renal remission.

CONCLUSION

MMF offers similar efficacy in renal remission and survival as CYC. MMF appears safer than CYC in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis.

Outcome of chilean patients with lupus nephritis and response to intravenous cyclophosphamide

Several recent open studies suggest that the response rates of lupus nephritis to intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide are lower than those observed in clinical trials. One explanation could be ethnic differences; for example, black patients more frequently have treatment-resistant lupus nephritis. Another could be the inclusion of patients who are noncompliant with therapy. From our register of 268 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients examined between 1973 and 1996, 61 patients were treated for proliferative lupus nephritis (17 had World Health Organization [WHO] type III and 43 had WHO type IV) and were followed through to 2001. Exclusion criteria included a serum creatinine level >3 mg/dL. In this retrospective study, we assessed renal outcome and survival with an endpoint of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or death (Kaplan-Meier). In the univariate analysis, worse prognostic factors for survival were serum creatinine >1.3 mg/dL (p < 0.001), age <30 years (p < 0.001), class 2 renal function stage (p < 0.03), and renal biopsy activity index >7 (p < 0.02). In the subgroup of 26 patients treated with IV cyclophosphamide, survival at 5 and 10 years was 82% and 73%, respectively. The dosage of IV cyclophosphamide was slightly lower than usual and used for a shorter period (median = 23 months) than what is usually recommended because of the high frequency of complications. Renal outcome of the IV cyclophosphamide-treated patients was poorer than that reported in the National Institutes of Health series (ESRD: 15% versus 3%). This low survival rate could reflect the short course and lower doses of IV cyclophosphamide used or ethnic differences. These data emphasize the need for continuous research for better-tolerated drug schemes for treatment of our lupus nephritis patients.

Cyclophosphamide versus methylprednisolone for treating neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus is complex and several clinical presentations are related to this disease such as: convulsions, chronic headache, transverse myelitis, vascular brain disease, psychosis and neural cognitive dysfunction. This systematic review is an update of a review performed in 2000.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone in the treatment of neuropsychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched EMBASE, LILACS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and MEDLINE up to and including May 2005. Additional articles were sought through handsearching in relevant journals. There were no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials that compared cyclophosphamide to methylprednisolone were included. Patients of any age and gender were included as long as they fulfilled the criterion of the American College of Rheumatology for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus and presented with any one of the following neuropsychiatric events: convulsions, organic brain syndrome and cranial neuropathy. Outcome measures included the following: a) overall mortality (primary event); b) motor and psychiatric deficit (primary event); c) clinical improvement (secondary event).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was independently extracted by two reviewers and cross-checked. The methodological quality of each trial was assessed by the same two reviewers. Details of the randomisation (generation and concealment), blinding, and the number of patients lost to follow-up were recorded. Dichotomous data was presented as relative risks with corresponding 95% confidence intervals and a clinical relevance table was produced.

MAIN RESULTS

We found one randomised controlled trial of 32 patients comparing cyclophosphamide versus methylprednisolone for the treatment of neuropsychiatric involvement in the systemic lupus erythematosus. A significantly greater number of people responded to treatment in the cyclophosphamide group. Treatment response was found in 94.7% (18/19) of patients using cyclophosphamide compared with 46.2% (6/13) in the methylprednisolone group at 24 months (RR 2.05, 95% CI 1.13, 3.73) The NNT for response to treatment is 2. Cyclophosphamide use was associated with a reduction in prednisone requirements. A significant decrease in the number seizures per month was observed in the cyclophosphamide group. All the patients in the cyclophosphamide group had electroencephalographic improvement. No significant differences in adverse effects between the groups were found. It was not possible to extract more data from the study because there was a small number of patients in the others clinical subgroups of neurological manifestations and the authors did not provide sufficient information for data extraction.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review found one randomised controlled trial with a small number of patients in the different clinical subgroups of neurological manifestation. It seems that cyclophosphamide is more effective in the treatment of neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic erythematosus lupus compared with methylprednisolone. However, properly designed randomised controlled trials that involve large, representative numbers of individuals, with explicit clinical and laboratory diagnosis criteria, sufficient duration of follow-up and description of all relevant outcome measures are necessary to guide practice.

Treatment for lupus nephritis: a revisit

The optimal treatment of severe lupus nephritis remains unclear. Regimens consisting of steroid and cyclophosphamide (CYC) appear to be most effective. Infection and gonadal toxicity is a major concern of CYC use in patients of reproductive age. In addition, failure to respond or refractory to CYC treatment may lead to the development of end-stage renal disease. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a new immunosuppressive agent that selectively inhibits activated lymphocytes and renal mesangial cells. Data from experimental lupus nephritis and controlled studies, albeit small and lacking statistical power, have revealed that MMF is as effective in lupus patients as CYC in the induction of renal remission or as maintenance therapy to reduce renal flare in the short term. The significantly less ovarian toxicity and infection when compared to CYC are particularly attractive for the consideration of MMF in lupus nephritis. The potential of other new therapeutic agents is discussed together with the need for patient recruitment in future trials of lupus nephritis to address the importance of ethnicity as well as histological grading.

Treatment of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

In this systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we assess the benefits and harm of current treatments for diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis (DPLN).

METHODS

The Cochrane Controlled Trial Registry, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched for RCTs of treatment for DPLN. All available RCTs of patients with biopsy-proven DPLN were included, and data were extracted for overall mortality, end-stage renal disease, doubling of serum creatinine level, relapse, major infection, herpes zoster infection, ovarian failure, malignancy, and bladder toxicity. Treatment effects on these outcomes were summarized as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and pooled by using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-five of 920 articles identified were eligible RCTs and were included. The majority compared cyclophosphamide or azathioprine plus steroids versus steroids alone. Cyclophosphamide plus steroids reduced the risk for doubling of serum creatinine level (4 RCTs, 228 patients; RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.88) compared with steroids alone, but had no impact on overall mortality (5 RCTs, 226 patients; RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.82). However, risk for ovarian failure was increased significantly (3 RCTs, 147 patients; RR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.34). In studies from the 1970s, azathioprine plus steroids reduced the risk for all-cause mortality compared with steroids alone (3 RCTs, 78 patients; RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.99), but had no effect on renal outcomes. Neither therapy was associated with increased risk for major infection. The addition of plasma exchange to these treatments offered no benefit, and information on other agents, including mycophenolate mofetil, was insufficient for analysis.

CONCLUSION

Until future RCTs of newer agents are completed, the current use of cyclophosphamide combined with steroids remains the best option to preserve renal function in patients with DPLN. The smallest effective dose and shortest duration of treatment should be used to minimize gonadal toxicity without compromising efficacy.

Treatment for lupus nephritis

BACKGROUND

Lupus nephritis is the renal manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) - a disease mainly affecting young women with substantial morbidity and mortality. It is classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria I - VI based on histology. WHO Class IV is a diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis which has the worst prognosis without treatment, with a reported 17% five year survival in the era 1953-1969. This survival was 82% in the early 1990's and continues to improve. An important factor behind this has been the use of cytotoxics such as cyclophosphamide in addition to steroids.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of different treatments in biopsy-proven proliferative lupus nephritis (LN).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register (January 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Randomised Controlled Trials (CENTRAL - The Cochrane Library issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 - 31 January 2003), EMBASE (1980 - 31 January 2003) and handsearched reference lists of retrieved articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing treatments for PLN in both adult and paediatric patients with Class III, IV, Vc, Vd lupus nephritis were included. All treatments were considered.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted and quality assessed independently by two reviewers, with differences resolved by discussion. Dichotomous outcomes are reported as relative risk (RR) and measurements on continuous scales are reported as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analysis by study quality, drug type and drug route have been performed where possible to explore reasons for heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 920 articles identified, 25 were RCTs suitable for inclusion, which enrolled 915 patients. The majority compared cyclophosphamide or azathioprine plus steroids versus steroids alone. Cyclophosphamide plus steroids reduced the risk of doubling of serum creatinine (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.88) compared to steroids alone but had no impact on mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.82). The risk of ovarian failure was significantly increased (RR 2.18, 95% CI 1.10 to 4.34). Azathioprine plus steroids reduced the risk of all cause mortality compared to steroids alone (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.99), but did not alter renal outcomes. Neither therapy was associated with increased risk of major infection. No benefit was found with addition of plasma exchange to cyclophosphamide or azathioprine plus steroids for mortality ( RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.02), doubling of serum creatinine (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.26) or end-stage renal failure (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.57). There was also no increased risk of major infection (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.37).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Until future RCTs of newer agents are completed, the current use of cyclophosphamide combined with steroids remains the best option to preserve renal function in proliferative LN. The smallest effective dose and shortest duration of treatment should be used to minimise gonadal toxicity, without compromising efficacy.

Treatment of lupus nephritis

Renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a serious complication of the disease. However, the prognosis of patients with lupus nephritis is continually improving with 10-year survival rates now greater than 75%. This improvement reflects earlier diagnosis due to more sensitive and specific diagnostic tests, better clinical appreciation of the natural history, and improved treatment of SLE and its manifestations. This review of the treatment of lupus nephritis has graded the level of evidence of specific treatment using the guidelines of the US Preventive Service Task Force. Although many new treatments have been advocated, the best evidence for treating proliferative lupus nephritis relies on a strategy combining specific treatment of the SLE as well as generalised treatment of the associated comorbidities. This strategy involves a combination of corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents plus or minus the adjunctive use of antimalarials, coordinated aggressive management of hypertension, proteinuria, infections, dyslipidaemia, thrombotic coagulopathy and potential renal replacement therapies.

Mycophenolate mofetil in lupus glomerulonephritis

The optimal treatment of severe lupus nephritis is unclear. Regimens consisting of steroid and cyclophosphamide (CYC) appear to be most effective. However, up to 15% of patients are refractory to CYC treatment, and 30% to 50% of patients still develop end-stage renal disease. Moreover, infection and gonadal toxicity are major concerns of CYC use in patients of the reproductive age. More effective, but less toxic, regimens are needed. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a new immunosuppressive agent that selectively inhibits activated lymphocytes and renal mesangial cells. Experience with MMF in solid-organ transplantation has shown the safety of this drug and its superiority over azathioprine (AZA) in the prevention of acute graft rejection. Data from experimental models of immune-mediated glomerulonephritis, particularly lupus nephritis, have shown that MMF ameliorates autoimmune phenomena, retards renal damage, and improves outcome. Although the use of MMF in lupus nephritis is still in its preliminary stage, uncontrolled experience has confirmed its efficacy in patients with serious disease recalcitrant to conventional cytotoxic agents. Controlled studies, albeit small and lacking statistical power, have shown that MMF is as effective as CYC in the induction of renal remission in the short term. With the current dosage used in systemic lupus erythematosus, MMF appears to be well tolerated, with no serious toxicities reported. Significantly less ovarian toxicity compared with CYC is particularly attractive for the consideration of MMF in lupus nephritis. However, the lack of long-term efficacy data and comparative studies with standard CYC regimens is the major deterrent for the first-line use of MMF in high-risk patients at this juncture.

Renal flares in 91 SLE patients with diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis

BACKGROUND

Even when treated with current protocols, 25 to 30% of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis (DPGN) evolve to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The occurrence of renal flares is considered to be an important risk factor for the evolution to ESRD. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the incidence and prognostic significance of renal flares in SLE patients with DPGN and to identify predictors for the occurrence of flares.

METHODS

Ninety-one SLE patients were selected for study based on the following criteria: (a) evidence of renal involvement, (b) a follow-up of at least 6 months after the renal biopsy, and (c) a steady improvement in renal manifestations after the biopsy lasting for at least three months.

RESULTS

Renal flares occurred in 54% of the patients after renal biopsy and appropriate treatment. A younger age at the time of renal biopsy correlated with the occurrence of renal flares. A high activity index (> or =10) and karyorrhexis on histology correlated with the occurrence of nephritic flares. Twenty-seven percent of the patients developed ESRD. The number of renal flares, nephritic flares, and "early" proteinuric flares (that is, those occurring in the first 18 months after renal biopsy) as well as serum creatinine levels, karyorrhexis, and chronicity index on renal histology were correlated with doubling serum creatinine.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that (a) a distinct subgroup of SLE patients exists, made up of younger patients with extensive, active lesions on renal biopsy, who are at higher risk for renal flares, (b) renal flares represent important predictors of doubling serum creatinine.

Outcome and prognostic indicators of diffuse proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis treated with sequential oral cyclophosphamide and azathioprine

OBJECTIVE

To study the outcome and prognostic indicators of diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis (DPGN) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treated with sequential oral cyclophosphamide (CYC) and azathioprine (AZA).

METHODS

SLE patients with biopsy-proven DPGN treated with sequential oral CYC and AZA were studied. Those who achieved renal remission at 12 months were identified, and the clinical predictors of complete remission were evaluated by regression analysis. All patients were followed up until a relapse of the nephritis or a doubling of the serum creatinine level occurred. The timing and risk factors for flares and creatinine doubling were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and with the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

We studied 55 patients (47 women, 8 men; mean +/- SD age at renal biopsy 31.1 +/- 10.4 years); 25 (46%) had a serum creatinine level >106 micromoles/liter, and 29 (53%) had nephrotic syndrome. At 12 months posttreatment, 37 (67%) had complete remission and 12 (22%) had partial remission. The initial serum creatinine level was an independent predictor of complete remission. Excluding the 4 patients who were treatment- resistant or died, 21 patients (41%) had renal flares during a median followup of 4 years. The cumulative risk of renal flare was 6% at 1 year, 21% at 3 years, and 32% at 5 years. The median time to relapse was 43 months. The histologic activity score and the mean daily dose of CYC were multivariate predictors of renal flare, by Cox regression. At the last followup visit, 9 of 54 patients (17%) had a doubling of the creatinine level, 6 of whom (11%) underwent dialysis. The cumulative risk of creatinine doubling was 8.4% at 5 years and 18.2% at 10 years. An increasing chronicity index at the time of initial renal biopsy was an independent predictor of deterioration in renal function.

CONCLUSION

Sequential therapy with oral CYC followed by AZA appears to be an effective treatment regimen for DPGN in patients with SLE, with 89% of patients achieving complete or partial remission at 12 months, 62.8% remaining in remission after 5 years, and 81.8% having stable renal function after 10 years. Predictors of treatment resistance and relapse include increasing serum creatinine level, higher histologic activity scores, and a lower dose of CYC. Increasing chronicity indices predict a deterioration of renal function.

Clinical trials in lupus nephritis

Significant advances in the treatment of lupus nephritis have been made in the last 50 years, beginning with the use of high doses of corticosteroids. The addition of intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) to steroids, a regimen introduced by the National Institutes of Health, has become the standard of care therapy for severe active nephritis. However, not all patients respond to IVC, and among those who do, manifestations of toxicity (nausea, vomiting, alopecia, sterility, increased risk of infection, and increased risk of malignancy) are frequent. Despite successful induction and maintenance therapy with IVC, there is a relapse rate of more than 50% after 10 years. In recent years, new immunosuppressive agents have been studied as potential alternatives to IVC. The most promising of these appears to be mycofenolate mofetil, which is being evaluated in clinical trials. Biologic agents designed to interfere with the immunologic process leading to B- and T-lymphocyte activation are also being tested as alternative therapies in lupus nephritis.

Therapy with pulse methylprednisolone and short course pulse cyclophosphamide for diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis

The incidence of renal flares and the long-term outcome in a group of 33 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis (DPGN) treated with pulse steroids and a short course of pulse cyclophosphamide (CYC) are evaluated. Fifteen patients (45%) experienced a flare of renal disease at some time after the discontinuation of the immunosuppressive (IS) therapy; among these half (24%) were 'early' flares occurring shortly after the discontinuation of therapy, and the other half (21%) were 'late' flares occurring more than 2 y after the discontinuation of the treatment. Nine patients (27%) showed a poor renal outcome at the end of follow-up. On multiple regression analysis, a younger age and a high activity index (AI) on renal histology were found to be correlated with the occurrence of renal flares. Our results suggest that the combination of pulse steroids with a short course of pulse CYC (six to nine pulses) is effective in both controlling disease activity and in preventing the occurrence of renal flares in DPGN. However, short term IS therapy might not be sufficient to maintain disease control in younger patients with active lesions on renal histology. Such patients might be candidates to receive more prolonged IS treatment.

Cyclophosphamide for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

Aggressive immunosuppressive therapy with cyclophosphamide has improved the outcome of major organ disease in lupus patients. Controlled trials have shown that pulse cyclophosphamide is the treatment of choice for patients with moderate to severe proliferative nephritis. Long-term follow-up of patients participating in these controlled trials suggests that combining pulse cyclophoshamide with pulse methylprednisolone increases efficacy but not toxicity. Retrospective case series have also shown that pulse cyclophosphamide therapy may be effective for the management of severe or refractory to standard therapy neuropsychiatric, pulmonary, cardiovascular and hematologic disease. Pulse cyclophosphamide is associated with an increased risk for herpes zoster infections in the short term and with sustained amenorrhea in the long-term. Recent studies have also drawn attention to the lack of response (or incomplete response) and flare of lupus after an initial response. In an effort to circumvent these limitations, current investigations explore the therapeutic potential of high-dose, immunoablative cyclophosphamide therapy or low-dose cyclophosphamide in combination with nucleoside analogs or biologic response modifiers.

Novel approaches in the treatment of lupus nephritis

In systemic lupus erythematosus hyperactive helper T-cells drive polyclonal B-cell activation and secretion of pathogenic auto-antibodies. The auto-antibodies form immune complexes with their respective auto-antigens, which in turn deposit in sites such as the kidney and initiate a destructive inflammatory reaction. Lupus nephritis can be managed successfully in the majority of cases; however, the most widely used immunosuppressive therapies, notably corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide are non-specific and are associated with substantial toxicities. Novel treatments for lupus nephritis have to be at least as effective and less toxic than existing therapies. The ultimate aim is to develop treatments that target specific steps in the disease process. Novel therapeutic strategies in the short-term more likely will focus on refining regimens of drugs that are already in use (mycophenolate mofetil, adenosine analogues) and combinations of existing chemotherapeutic agents, as well as attempts to achieve immunological reconstitution using immunoablative chemotherapy with or without haematopoietic stem cell rescue. Several new agents targeting specific steps in the pathogenesis of lupus are in various phases of clinical development. Interrupting the interactions between T-lymphocytes and other cells by blocking co-stimulatory molecules, such as CD40 ligand or CTLA4-Ig, may interfere with the early steps of pathogenesis. Blocking IL-10 may decrease auto-antibody production and help normalise T-cell function. Treating patients with DNase or interfering with the complement cascade by blocking C5, or neutralising pathogenic antibodies by administering specific binding peptides or inducing specific anti-idiotype antibodies may prevent immune complex formation and/or deposition.

Cyclophosphamide versus methylprednisolone for the treatment of neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus is complex and several clinical presentations are related to this disease such as: convulsions, chronic headache, transverse myelitis, vascular brain disease, psychosis and neural cognitive dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone in the treatment of neuropsychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus on mortality and side effects.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched EMBASE, LILACS, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and MEDLINE up to and including December 1999, additional articles were sought through handsearching in relevant journals, using the search strategy described in the Cochrane Handbook [Dickersin 1994]. There were no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials which compared cyclophosphamide to methylprednisolone were to be included. Patients of any age and gender were included if they fulfilled the criterion of the American Rheumatology Association for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus and presented with any one of the following neuropsychiatric events; convulsions, organic brain syndrome; cranial neuropathy. Outcome measures included the following: a) Overall mortality (primary event); b) Motor and psychiatric deficit (primary event); c) Clinical improvement (secondary event).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The analysis planned was to do the following: Data would be independently extracted by the two reviewers and cross-checked. The methodological quality of each trial would be assessed by the same two reviewers. Details of the randomisation (generation and concealment), blinding, and the number of patients lost on follow-up would be recorded. The results of each RCT would be summarised on an intention-to-treat basis in 2 x 2 tables for each outcome. External validity would be defined by characteristics of the participants, the interventions and the outcomes. If appropriate, RCTs would be stratified based on control group and category of disease in accordance to the clinical homogeneity (external validity). The results obtained from these different methods are very similar, and therefore, only the results from the Risk Difference method, with the corresponding 95% confidence interval would be presented in this review. The fixed effects model would be used if there was no significant statistical heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no randomised controlled trials comparing cyclophosphamide versus methylprednisolone for the treatment of neuropsychiatric involvement in the systemic lupus erythematosus.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Cyclophosphamide regimen treatment is a form of care in neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus with no evidence to prove better effectiveness and safety when compared with methylprednisolone. This systematic review found no randomised controlled trials and its findings must be interpreted as 'no evidence of effect' and not as 'evidence of no effect'.

A pilot study of 2-chloro-2'-deoxyadenosine in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus-associated glomerulonephritis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and tolerability, as well as the clinical and immunologic effects, of 2-chloro-2'-deoxyadenosine (2-CdA) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus-associated glomerulonephritis.

METHODS

In a phase I study, 12 patients with proliferative lupus nephritis received 2-CdA either in weekly escalating intravenous treatments (0.15 mg/kg/week x 4, 0.1875 mg/kg/week x 4, 0.225 mg/kg/week x 4; n = 5) or in a continuous 7-day infusion (0.05 mg/kg/day; n = 7). Safety, renal improvement, and immunologic effects were evaluated for 12 months.

RESULTS

Patients treated with 2-CdA showed peripheral lymphocyte depletion without a significant reduction in neutrophil, monocyte, or platelet numbers or hematocrit levels. Naive and memory T cells were decreased, as were lymphocytes with markers of early and late activation. Peripheral B cell depletion was not associated with significant decreases in serum immunoglobulin levels. Continuous infusion induced better clinical responses than weekly infusions, as evidenced by 1) the percentage of patients showing complete response (43% versus 0%), 2) the percentage with at least 50% reduction in proteinuria (43% versus 20%), 3) the percentage with at least a 50% reduction in urinary dysmorphic red cells (57% versus 0%), and 4) the percentage in whom cellular casts disappeared (43% versus 0%). Several infections occurred; these responded to standard antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, 2-CdA was safely administered to 12 patients with lupus nephritis. It induced prolonged reductions in lymphocyte populations and may be efficacious in selected patients with lupus nephritis when administered as a continuous infusion.

Glucocorticosteroids as immunosuppressive agents

When administered at pharmacological dosages, glucocorticosteroid hormones alter leukocyte kinetics, phagocytic cell function, cell-mediated immunity, and, to a lesser extent, humoral immunity. These properties are used to advantage in the treatment of immunologically mediated disease. Corticosteroids are used to suppress pathological immune responses associated with autoimmunity, inhibit rejection of allogenic tissues after organ transplantation, and to diminish inflammation associated with a wide variety of hypersensitivity disorders. The mechanisms by which corticosteroids relieve these conditions are still not completely understood but have recently become more comprehensible. By understanding how corticosteroids exert their effects, we can make better clinical decisions in the management of immune-mediated disease.