1
|
Wagner W, Viidalepp A, Idoiaga-Mondragon N, Talves K, Lillemäe E, Pekarev J, Otsus M. Lay representations of artificial intelligence and autonomous military machines. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (BRISTOL, ENGLAND) 2023; 32:926-943. [PMID: 37194940 DOI: 10.1177/09636625231167071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
This study is about how lay persons perceive and represent artificial intelligence in general as well as its use in weaponised autonomous ground vehicles in the military context. We analysed the discourse of six focus groups in Estonia, using an automatic text analysis tool and complemented the results by a qualitative thematic content analysis. The findings show that representations of artificial intelligence-driven machines are anchored in the image of man. A cluster analysis revealed five dominant themes: artificial intelligence as programmed machines, artificial intelligence and the problem of control, artificial intelligence and its relation to human life, artificial intelligence used in wars and ethical problems in developing autonomous weaponised machines. The findings are discussed with regard to people's tendency to anthropomorphise robots despite their lack of emotions, which can be seen as a last resort when confronting an autonomous machine where the usual interpersonal understanding of intentions does not apply.
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang G, Kong Q, Wang D, Asmi F. Ethical and social insights into synthetic biology: predicting research fronts in the post-COVID-19 era. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11:1085797. [PMID: 37274167 PMCID: PMC10235617 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1085797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
As a revolutionary biological science and technology, synthetic biology has already spread its influence from natural sciences to humanities and social sciences by introducing biosafety, biosecurity, and ethical issues to society. The current study aims to elaborate the intellectual bases and research front of the synthetic biology field in the sphere of philosophy, ethics, and social sciences, with knowledge mapping and bibliometric methods. The literature records from the Social Sciences Citation Index and Arts & Humanities Citation Index in the Web of Science Core Collection from 1982 to 2021 were collected and analyzed to illustrate the intellectual structure of philosophical, ethical, and social research of synthetic biology. This study profiled the hotspots of research focus on its governance, philosophical and ethical concerns, and relevant technologies. This study offers clues and enlightenment for the stakeholders and researchers to follow the progress of this emerging discipline and technology and to understand the cutting-edge ideas and future form of this field, which takes on greater significance in the post-COVID-19 era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dong Wang
- *Correspondence: Dong Wang, ; Fahad Asmi,
| | - Fahad Asmi
- *Correspondence: Dong Wang, ; Fahad Asmi,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
MacDonald EA, Edwards E, Balanovic J, Medvecky F. Underlying beliefs linked to public opinion about gene drive and pest-specific toxin for pest control. WILDLIFE RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.1071/wr19149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
ContextDeveloping a new tool for wide-scale rat eradication is necessary for significant biodiversity gains. Underlying beliefs linked to public opinion can help guide policy makers to understand public concern and inform an effective discourse.
AimsWe investigated underlying beliefs linked to levels of support for a potentially disruptive tool, gene drive, compared with a traditional stepwise tool, aerial distribution of a new pest-specific toxin.
MethodsUsing the theory of planned behaviour, we surveyed (n=1200) a representative sample of New Zealanders to assess the level of support for the tool related to attitude, normative and control beliefs.
Key resultsAttitude (e.g. gene drive is good/bad and gene drive is risky/safe) and two norms (e.g. people like me and people in my household) were key contributors to level of support for gene drive. Behavioural beliefs (if scientific evidence can prove it works, concern there are unknown consequences, a humane way to rid New Zealand of rats, and gene drive goes against natural way of life) were also significant. For aerial distribution of a new pest-specific toxin, the same attitudes and normative beliefs identified for gene drive also contributed significantly to the model. Four behavioural beliefs, namely, aerial delivery could affect areas outside the target zones, if there is scientific evidence, and it is impossible to make a pest-specific toxin that would not harm our native wildlife were also significant. The impact either tool may have on biodiversity was not significant in either model.
ConclusionsDecision making about both gene drive (a disruptive technology) and aerial distribution of a pest-specific toxin (a stepwise technology) is primarily influenced by attitudes, with a few beliefs also influencing decision making. Novelty of the tool does not affect the underlying beliefs that are influencing levels of support.
ImplicationsPublic engagement that acknowledges and responds to these underlying beliefs, rather than a traditional campaign based on biodiversity and environmental gains, may be more effective at creating a constructive dialogue about if and how these tools should be used, and to avoid replicating the polarised debate about 1080.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ditlevsen K, Glerup C, Sandøe P, Lassen J. Synthetic livestock vaccines as risky interference with nature? Lay and expert arguments and understandings of "naturalness". PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (BRISTOL, ENGLAND) 2020; 29:289-305. [PMID: 32072864 PMCID: PMC7323771 DOI: 10.1177/0963662520906083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The article describes how the idea of "naturalness" was used by three different groups in arguments over the risk of livestock vaccines developed in synthetic biology. Based on interviews with two groups of scientific experts and focus groups with lay people in five European countries, and using Toulmin's argument analysis as the analytical tool, the article maps and compares the different ways in which "naturalness" was used as a warrant. Several notions of "naturalness" are involved in lay people's reasoning and several lay people's understandings of risk relied on their perceptions of the "unnaturalness" of the synthetic vaccines. The notion of "naturalness" was used less by synthetic biology experts and not at all by vaccine experts. Lay people see the vaccine as less natural than other vaccines and therefore as a greater risk. In contrast, synthetic biology experts understand synthetic biology as natural, and relate naturalness, unpredictability and risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kia Ditlevsen
- Kia Ditlevsen, Department of Food and
Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958
Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Synthetic biology applied in the agrifood sector: Public perceptions, attitudes and implications for future studies. Trends Food Sci Technol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
6
|
Pei L, Schmidt M. Synthetic Biology: From Genetic Engineering 2.0 to Responsible Research and Innovation. Synth Biol (Oxf) 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/9783527688104.ch18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Pei
- Biofaction KG, Technology Assessment; Kundmanngasse 39/12 Wien 1030 Austria
| | - Markus Schmidt
- Biofaction KG, Technology Assessment; Kundmanngasse 39/12 Wien 1030 Austria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mehltretter Drury SA, Bost AG, Wysocki LM, Ingram AL. Encouraging Science Communication through Deliberative Pedagogy: A Study of a Gene Editing Deliberation in a Nonmajors Biology Course. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOLOGY EDUCATION 2018; 19:jmbe-19-18. [PMID: 29904512 PMCID: PMC5969398 DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Deliberative pedagogy encourages productive science communication and learning through engagement and discussion of socio-scientific issues (SSI). This article examines a two-day deliberation module on gene editing that took place in an introductory nonmajors biology course, furthering research on integrating deliberative discussion into the biology classroom. The results demonstrate the benefits of a single, episodic deliberation in the classroom, which can positively encourage active discussion and critical awareness of connections between biology and real-world issues, thus contributing to the development of scientific citizenship. Additionally, the findings show that gene editing is an apt SSI topic for the deliberative process because it encourages productive communication practices of scientific citizenship, including discussion, perspective taking, questioning, and consideration of different types of evidence when coming to a decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara A. Mehltretter Drury
- Wabash College Department of Rhetoric, Crawfordsville, IN 47933
- Corresponding author. Mailing address: Wabash College Department of Rhetoric, PO Box 352, Crawfordsville, IN 47933. Phone: 765-361-6393. E-mail:
| | | | - Laura M. Wysocki
- Wabash College Department of Chemistry, Crawfordsville, IN 47933
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bechtold S. Beyond Risk Considerations: Where and How Can a Debate About Non-safety Related Issues of Genome Editing in Agriculture Take Place? FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2018; 9:1724. [PMID: 30534131 PMCID: PMC6275233 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/06/2018] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
|
9
|
Ineichen C, Biller-Andorno N, Deplazes-Zemp A. Image of Synthetic Biology and Nanotechnology: A Survey among University Students. Front Genet 2017; 8:122. [PMID: 28979291 PMCID: PMC5611450 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 09/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This study explores the image of synthetic biology and nanotechnology in comparison to agricultural biotechnology and communication technology by examining spontaneous associations with, and deliberate evaluations of, these technologies by university students. Data were collected through a self-completion online questionnaire by students from two universities in Switzerland. The survey aimed to capture implicit associations, explicit harm-benefit evaluations and views on regulation. The data suggest overall positive associations with emerging technologies. While positive associations were most pronounced for nanotechnology, agricultural biotechnology was attributed with the least favorable associations. In contrast to its positive result in the association task, respondents attributed a high harm potential for nanotechnology. Associations attributed to synthetic biology were demonstrated to be more positive than for agricultural biotechnology, however, not as favorable as for nanotechnology. Contrary to the evaluations of nanotechnology, the benefit-examples of synthetic biology were evaluated particularly positively. Accordingly, the investigated technologies enjoy different esteem, with synthetic biology and nanotechnology both showing a more "exciting" image. Even though, the image of nanotechnology was demonstrated to be more pronounced it was also more heterogeneous across tasks while agricultural biotechnology remains contested. For all technologies, the predominant spontaneous concerns pertain to risks rather than an immoral nature inherent to these technologies. Our data suggest that harm-benefit analyses reveal only one aspect of the attitude toward emerging technologies. Survey questions addressing spontaneous associations with these technologies are a valuable addition for our picture of the image of emerging technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Ineichen
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of ZurichZürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Anna Deplazes-Zemp
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of ZurichZürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ancillotti M, Holmberg N, Lindfelt M, Eriksson S. Uncritical and unbalanced coverage of synthetic biology in the Nordic press. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (BRISTOL, ENGLAND) 2017; 26:235-250. [PMID: 26481730 DOI: 10.1177/0963662515609834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Synthetic biology will probably have a high impact on a variety of fields, such as healthcare, environment, biofuels, agriculture, and so on. A driving theme in European research policy is the importance of maintaining public legitimacy and support. Media can influence public attitudes and are therefore an important object of study. Through qualitative content analysis, this study investigates the press coverage of synthetic biology in the major Nordic countries between 2009 and 2014. The press coverage was found to be event-driven and there were striking similarities between countries when it comes to framing, language use, and treated themes. Reporters showed a marked dependence on their sources, mainly scientists and stakeholders, who thus drives the media agenda. The media portrayal was very positive, with an optimistic look at future benefits and very little discussion of possible risks.
Collapse
|
11
|
Akin H, Rose KM, Scheufele DA, Simis-Wilkinson M, Brossard D, Xenos MA, Corley EA. Mapping the Landscape of Public Attitudes on Synthetic Biology. Bioscience 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biw171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
12
|
Lander J, Hainz T, Hirschberg I, Bossert S, Strech D. Do Public Involvement Activities in Biomedical Research and Innovation Recruit Representatively? A Systematic Qualitative Review. Public Health Genomics 2016; 19:193-202. [PMID: 27027649 DOI: 10.1159/000444478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public involvement activities (PIAs) may contribute to the governance of ethically challenging biomedical research and innovation by informing, consulting with and engaging the public in developments and decision-making processes. For PIAs to capture a population's preferences (e.g. on issues in whole genome sequencing, biobanks or genome editing), a central methodological requirement is to involve a sufficiently representative subgroup of the general public. While the existing literature focusses on theoretical and normative aspects of 'representation', this study assesses empirically how such considerations are implemented in practice. It evaluates how PIA reports describe representation objectives, the recruitment process and levels of representation achieved. METHODS PIA reports were included from a systematic literature search if they directly reported a PIA conducted in a relevant discipline such as genomics, biobanks, biotechnology or others. PIA reports were analyzed with thematic text analysis. The text analysis was guided by an assessment matrix based on PIA-specific guidelines and frameworks. RESULTS We included 46 relevant reports, most focusing on issues in genomics. 27 reports (59%) explicitly described representation objectives, though mostly without adjusting eligibility criteria and recruiting methods to the specific objective. 11 reports (24%) explicitly reported to have achieved the intended representation; the rest either reported failure or were silent on this issue. CONCLUSION Representation of study samples in PIAs in biomedical research and innovation is currently not reported systematically. Improved reporting on representation would not only improve the validity and value of PIAs, but could also contribute to PIA results being used more often in relevant policy and decision-making processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Lander
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hainz T, Bossert S, Strech D. Collective agency and the concept of 'public' in public involvement: A practice-oriented analysis. BMC Med Ethics 2016; 17:1. [PMID: 26732279 PMCID: PMC4702418 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-015-0083-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2015] [Accepted: 12/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Public involvement activities are promoted as measures for ensuring good governance in challenging fields, such as biomedical research and innovation. Proponents of public involvement activities include individual researchers as well as non-governmental and governmental organizations. However, the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement deserves more attention by researchers because it is not purely theoretical: it has important practical functions in the guidance, evaluation and translation of public involvement activities. Discussion This article focuses on collective agency as one property a public as a small group of participants in a public involvement activity could exhibit. It introduces a prominent theoretical approach to collective agents as one specific kind of social entities and demonstrates how this approach can be applied to current practice in public involvement activities. A brief discussion of different types of representation as they are used in the existing literature on this topic is also included because representation and collective agency can be closely related to each other. Suggestions and ideas that are derived from this reasoning include the proposal to use a ‘validity check’ for the generation of collective agents as a regular element of certain types of public involvement activities, the consequences of combining collective agency and representativeness as a further property a public could exhibit, and standards for reporting the content of public involvement activities in scientific publications. Summary This article discusses the importance of the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement activities, with a focus on biomedical research and innovation. It introduces various practically relevant ideas that are based on a theoretical analysis of collective agency as an important property a public can possess. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-015-0083-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Hainz
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Institute for History, Theory and Ethics of Medicine, Am Pulverturm 13, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Sabine Bossert
- Hannover Medical School, Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Daniel Strech
- Hannover Medical School, Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kerbe W. What is Life-in Everyday Understanding? A Focus Group Study on Lay Perspectives on the Term Life. ARTIFICIAL LIFE 2015; 22:119-133. [PMID: 26649809 DOI: 10.1162/artl_a_00181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
The philosophical and scientific debate about definitions of life-as-we-know-it and its value is very diverse. How do non-biologists characterize these issues? We held focus groups to shed light on the role of the term life in laypeople's understanding. Results show that features of early childhood cognition dominate the understanding of the term life even in adulthood. Textbook knowledge and definitions derived from specific knowledge systems and beliefs are of minor importance. For an ethical differentiation between life forms the ability to feel and to suffer is seen as the crucial criterion. We conclude that lay perspectives on the concept of life can shape a normative discourse on existing as well as on new life forms in a crucial way. In addition, these perspectives may also strongly influence the expectations towards the life-as-it-could-be that is brought forward by the artificial life community. While some concepts like metabolism exist both in scientific and in everyday reasoning as criteria for life, the normative discussion on life is dominated by such ideas as a hierarchical order of living kinds, which emphasize "easy to think" concepts of a moral differentiation. These can also form a basis for the moral standing of artificial life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Kerbe
- Johannes Kepler University, Linz and Biofaction KG, Vienna
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Starkbaum J, Braun M, Dabrock P. The synthetic biology puzzle: a qualitative study on public reflections towards a governance framework. SYSTEMS AND SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY 2015; 9:147-157. [PMID: 28392848 PMCID: PMC5383795 DOI: 10.1007/s11693-015-9182-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2015] [Accepted: 10/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Synthetic biology is currently one of the most debated emerging biotechnologies. The societal assessment of this technology is primarily based on contributions by scientists and policy makers, who focus mainly on technical challenges and possible risks. While public dialogue is given, it is yet rather limited. This study explores public debates concerning synthetic biology based on a focus group study with citizens from Austria and Germany and contextualises the analysed public views with content from policy reports and previous empirical studies on public engagement. The findings suggest that discussants favoured a gradual implementation process of synthetic biology, which is receptive to questions about the distribution of possible benefits. The discussed topics correspond in many ways with content from policy reports and former investigations, yet the emphasis of the discussions was different for many aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Starkbaum
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Chair for Systematic Theology II (Ethics), Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Kochstraße 6, 91504 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Braun
- Chair for Systematic Theology II (Ethics), Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Kochstraße 6, 91504 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter Dabrock
- Chair for Systematic Theology II (Ethics), Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Kochstraße 6, 91504 Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Marcu A, Gaspar R, Rutsaert P, Seibt B, Fletcher D, Verbeke W, Barnett J. Analogies, metaphors, and wondering about the future: Lay sense-making around synthetic meat. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (BRISTOL, ENGLAND) 2015; 24:547-62. [PMID: 24553438 DOI: 10.1177/0963662514521106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Drawing on social representations theory, we explore how the public make sense of the unfamiliar, taking as the example a novel technology: synthetic meat. Data from an online deliberation study and eighteen focus groups in Belgium, Portugal and the UK indicated that the various strategies of sense-making afforded different levels of critical thinking about synthetic meat. Anchoring to genetic modification, metaphors like 'Frankenfoods' and commonplaces like 'playing God' closed off debates around potential applications of synthetic meat, whereas asking factual and rhetorical questions about it, weighing up pragmatically its risks and benefits, and envisaging changing current mentalities or behaviours in order to adapt to scientific developments enabled a consideration of synthetic meat's possible implications for agriculture, environment, and society. We suggest that research on public understanding of technology should cultivate a climate of active thinking and should encourage questioning during the process of sense-making to try to reduce unhelpful anchoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rui Gaspar
- Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Synthetic Biology for the Development of Biodrugs and Designer Crops and the Emerging Governance Issues. SYSTEMS AND SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9514-2_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
18
|
Lander J, Hainz T, Hirschberg I, Strech D. Current practice of public involvement activities in biomedical research and innovation: a systematic qualitative review. PLoS One 2014; 9:e113274. [PMID: 25469705 PMCID: PMC4254603 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2014] [Accepted: 10/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A recent report from the British Nuffield Council on Bioethics associated ‘emerging biotechnologies’ with a threefold challenge: 1) uncertainty about outcomes, 2) diverse public views on the values and implications attached to biotechnologies and 3) the possibility of creating radical changes regarding societal relations and practices. To address these challenges, leading international institutions stress the need for public involvement activities (PIAs). The objective of this study was to assess the state of PIA reports in the field of biomedical research. Methods PIA reports were identified via a systematic literature search. Thematic text analysis was employed for data extraction. Results After filtering, 35 public consultation and 11 public participation studies were included in this review. Analysis and synthesis of all 46 PIA studies resulted in 6 distinguishable PIA objectives and 37 corresponding PIA methods. Reports of outcome translation and PIA evaluation were found in 9 and 10 studies respectively (20% and 22%). The paper presents qualitative details. Discussion The state of PIAs on biomedical research and innovation is characterized by a broad range of methods and awkward variation in the wording of objectives. Better comparability of PIAs might improve the translation of PIA findings into further policy development. PIA-specific reporting guidelines would help in this regard. The modest level of translation efforts is another pointer to the “deliberation to policy gap”. The results of this review could inform the design of new PIAs and future efforts to improve PIA comparability and outcome translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Lander
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, CELLS-Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Science, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Street 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Tobias Hainz
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, CELLS-Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Science, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Street 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Irene Hirschberg
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, CELLS-Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Science, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Street 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Daniel Strech
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, CELLS-Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Science, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Street 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Domínguez M, Mateu A, Torgersen H, Porcar M. Cartoons on bacterial balloons: scientists' opinion on the popularization of synthetic biology. SYSTEMS AND SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY 2014; 8:321-8. [PMID: 26396656 PMCID: PMC4571726 DOI: 10.1007/s11693-014-9155-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2014] [Revised: 09/08/2014] [Accepted: 09/24/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
How do scientists perceive the media coverage of synthetic biology (SB)? In this paper, we approach this question by studying a set of cartoons devoted to SB. Based on a categorization of the cartoons into five large thematic groups an international survey was carried out to assess the opinion of SB research groups on science communication with regard to the public image of their discipline. The 101 responses obtained indicate that in general, their perception of the communication is not negative, although many respondents raised concerns on the media's inclination to sensationalism and over-simplification. However, the results also suggest that (in the light of the unfortunate experiences with GMO communication) scientists should think twice before proposing metaphorical interpretations of their research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martí Domínguez
- />Language Theory and Communication Sciences Department, University of Valencia, Blasco Ibáñez 32, 46008 Valencia, Spain
- />The Two Cultures Observatory, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Anna Mateu
- />The Two Cultures Observatory, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Helge Torgersen
- />Institute of Technology Assessment, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Manuel Porcar
- />The Two Cultures Observatory, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- />Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- />Fundació General, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Meyer A, Cserer A, Schmidt M. Frankenstein 2.0.: Identifying and characterising synthetic biology engineers in science fiction films. LIFE SCIENCES, SOCIETY AND POLICY 2013; 9:9. [PMCID: PMC4513001 DOI: 10.1186/2195-7819-9-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2013] [Accepted: 08/14/2013] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
Synthetic biology (SB) has emerged as one of the newest and promising areas of bio-technology. Issues typically associated to SB, notably in the media, like the idea of artificial life creation and “real” engineering of life also appear in many popular films. Drawing upon the analysis of 48 films, the article discusses how scientists applying technologies that can be related to SB are represented in these movies. It hereby discusses that traditional clichés of scientists in general tend to be sublated by new stereotypical characterizations. These reflect real trends in bio-technological research such as SB, especially the increased relationship between science and industry. Frankenstein 2.0. looks less like the old, genius yet mad scientist, and follows a more entrepreneurial than academic spirit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Meyer
- />Organisation for International Dialogue and Conflict Management (IDC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Amelie Cserer
- />Organisation for International Dialogue and Conflict Management (IDC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Schmidt
- />Organisation for International Dialogue and Conflict Management (IDC), Vienna, Austria
- />Biofaction KG, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Torgersen H, Schmidt M. Frames and comparators: How might a debate on synthetic biology evolve? FUTURES 2013; 48:44-54. [PMID: 23805003 PMCID: PMC3688360 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2013.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
A stimulated early public debate is frequently advocated when introducing an emerging technology like synthetic biology (SB). To debate a still quite abstract technology, participants functionally need a frame that determines which arguments are legitimate and which issues are relevant. Often, such frames are based on previous debates over other novel technologies. Three technologies currently provide frames for discussing SB: (green) biotechnology, nanotechnology and information technology. In the biotechnology debate, risk has long been emphasised over economic benefits. More recently, nanotechnology has been referred to mostly in terms of benefits, while risks tended to be an issue for scientific discourses. This has frequently been related to the many outreach activities around nanotechnology. Information technology, finally, has retained the image of being 'cool' and useful on a personal level. The technology itself is taken for granted and only the consequences of particular applications have been up for discussion. Upstream engagement exercises in SB will have to consider the comparator chosen more diligently, because it might influence the debate on SB 'out there' in the long run.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helge Torgersen
- Institute of Technology Assessment, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Strohgasse 45, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Schmidt
- Biofaction KG, Grundsteingasse 36/41, 1160 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|