1
|
Kapos FP, Craig KD, Anderson SR, Bernardes SF, Hirsh AT, Karos K, Keogh E, Reynolds Losin EA, McParland JL, Moore DJ, Ashton-James CE. Social Determinants and Consequences of Pain: Toward Multilevel, Intersectional, and Life Course Perspectives. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2024; 25:104608. [PMID: 38897311 PMCID: PMC11402600 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Despite wide endorsement of a biopsychosocial framework for pain, social aspects of pain remain rarely addressed in the context of pain prevention and management. In this review, we aim to 1) examine the broad scope of social determinants and consequences of pain and their interactions across multiple levels of organization, and 2) provide a framework synthesizing existing concepts and potential areas for future work on social aspects of pain, drawing upon socioecological, intersectional, and life course approaches. Integrating interdisciplinary theory and evidence, we outline pathways through which multilevel social factors and pain may affect each other over time. We also provide a brief summary of intrapersonal aspects of pain, which are thought to operate at the interface between individuals and the social context. Progressing from micro- to macrolevel factors, we illustrate how social determinants of pain can directly or indirectly contribute to pain experiences, expression, risk, prognosis, and impact across populations. We consider 1) at the interpersonal level, the roles of social comparison, social relatedness, social support, social exclusion, empathy, and interpersonal conflict; 2) at the group or community level, the roles of intimacy groups, task groups, social categories, and loose associations; and 3) at the societal level, the roles of political, economic, and cultural systems, as well as their policies and practices. We present examples of multilevel consequences of pain across these levels and discuss opportunities to reduce the burden and inequities of pain by expanding multilevel social approaches in pain research and practice. PERSPECTIVE: Despite wide endorsement of a biopsychosocial framework for pain, social aspects of pain are often unclearly defined, hindering their use in pain prevention, management, and research. We summarize the scope of social aspects of pain and provide a framework synthesizing existing concepts and potential areas for future work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia P Kapos
- Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Schoool of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Kenneth D Craig
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Steven R Anderson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Sónia F Bernardes
- Centre for Social Research and Intervention, Iscte-Lisbon University Institute, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Adam T Hirsh
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Kai Karos
- Experimental Health Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Edmund Keogh
- Department of Psychology & Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | | | - Joanna L McParland
- Department of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - David J Moore
- School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Claire E Ashton-James
- Pain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kragness HE, Cirelli LK. A syncing feeling: reductions in physiological arousal in response to observed social synchrony. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2021; 16:177-184. [PMID: 33449119 PMCID: PMC8208370 DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Synchronized movements are often key elements in activities where social bonding and
emotional connection are a shared goal, such as religious gatherings, sporting events,
parties and weddings. Previous studies have shown that synchronous movements enhance
prosocial attitudes and affiliative behaviors. Similarly, observers attribute more social
closeness to people moving synchronously together than people moving asynchronously. The
mechanisms by which synchrony modulates these attributions are not well understood. In the
present study, we ask whether viewing synchronous activities influences physiological
arousal as measured by skin conductance and whether group size impacts this effect.
Undergraduates viewed a series of short videos depicting people moving either (1) in or
out of synchrony with each other and (2) in a large or small group. Participants’ skin
conductance was measured. Change in skin conductance levels and response counts were
attenuated while watching synchronous movement, but only in the large-group condition.
Post-hoc analyses suggest that viewer enjoyment/interest in the large-group synchronous
videos mediated this association for phasic skin conductance responses, but no evidence of
mediation was found for tonic skin conductance levels. Results extend previous research on
affiliative effects of first-person interpersonal synchrony and demonstrate that watching
others moving synchronously has an attenuating effect on observers’ physiological
state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley E Kragness
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Canada
| | - Laura K Cirelli
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Charles SJ, Farias M, van Mulukom V, Saraswati A, Dein S, Watts F, Dunbar RIM. Blocking mu-opioid receptors inhibits social bonding in rituals. Biol Lett 2020; 16:20200485. [PMID: 33050833 PMCID: PMC7655482 DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Religious rituals are universal human practices that play a seminal role in community bonding. In two experiments, we tested the role of mu-opioids as the active factor fostering social bonding. We used a mu-opioid blocker (naltrexone) in two double-blind studies of rituals from different religious traditions. We found the same effect across both studies, with naltrexone leading to significantly lower social bonding compared with placebo. These studies suggest that mu-opioids play a significant role in experiences of social bonding within ritual contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Charles
- Brain, Belief, and Behaviour lab; Centre for Trust, Peace and Social Relations, Coventry University, Cheetah Road, Coventry CV1 2TL, UK
| | - M Farias
- Brain, Belief, and Behaviour lab; Centre for Trust, Peace and Social Relations, Coventry University, Cheetah Road, Coventry CV1 2TL, UK
| | - V van Mulukom
- Brain, Belief, and Behaviour lab; Centre for Trust, Peace and Social Relations, Coventry University, Cheetah Road, Coventry CV1 2TL, UK
| | - A Saraswati
- Traditional Yoga Association, Reading RG30 3DW, UK
| | - S Dein
- Department of Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
| | - F Watts
- International Society for Science and Religion, Cambridge, UK
| | - R I M Dunbar
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Evans MB, Graupensperger S, Benson AJ, Eys M, Hastings B, Gottschall JS. Group structure and entitativity in group fitness: considering groupness at within- and between-group levels. Psychol Health 2019; 34:715-732. [PMID: 30693798 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1566548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE How can we distinguish between a collection of individuals exercising alongside one another from group that is exercising 'together'? This question is central to research on the extent that individuals perceive their fitness settings to entail core features of groups. To advance understanding of the nature of groupness and its implications in exercise, the current study (a) evaluated a brief measure of groupness and (b) examined the extent that groupness predicted perceptions of exertion and affect. DESIGN Participants included 633 exercisers (Mage = 33.92, SD = 11.05, 74% female) who completed surveys after group fitness classes (k = 34). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Groupness, affect, exertion, and group cohesion. RESULTS Exploratory structural equation modelling provided support for a two-factor solution reflecting entitativity and group structure as subdimensions of groupness. The groupness factors were differentially associated with theoretically relevant aspects of classes (e.g. synchronised movement), the individual (e.g. number of members interacted with), as well as group cohesion. Groupness also predicted perceived exertion and affect. CONCLUSION Our research provides support for a brief measure of groupness, advances theory related to how individuals perceive exercise groups, and provides evidence regarding how broader experiences during exercise may relate to exercisers' perceptions of groupness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Blair Evans
- a Department of Kinesiology , Penn State University , University Park , PA , USA
| | - Scott Graupensperger
- a Department of Kinesiology , Penn State University , University Park , PA , USA
| | - Alex J Benson
- b Department of Psychology , University of Western Ontario , London , Ontario , Canada
| | - Mark Eys
- c Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education , Wilfrid Laurier University , Waterloo , Ontario , Canada.,d Department of Psychology , Wilfrid Laurier University , Waterloo , Ontario , Canada
| | | | - Jinger S Gottschall
- a Department of Kinesiology , Penn State University , University Park , PA , USA
| |
Collapse
|