Methylphenidate for fatigue in advanced cancer: a prospective open-label pilot study

Assessment of Stimulant Use and Cardiovascular Event Risks Among Older Adults

IMPORTANCE

Use of stimulants continues to increase among older adults for a variety of indications. An association between stimulant use and increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events has been established among children and young adults, but few studies have explored the risk of CV events among older patients, a group with increased baseline risk.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between stimulant use and risk of CV events among older adults.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This propensity score-matched cohort study, with 4 nonusers per 1 user, was conducted from July 1, 2017, to June 27, 2019, using data from population-based health care databases from Ontario, Canada, from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2016. Included individuals were outpatients aged 66 years or older.

EXPOSURES

Initiation of a prescription stimulant.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was a CV event, defined as a composite of emergency department visit or hospitalization for myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), or ventricular arrhythmia. Risk of CV event was assessed at 30 days, 180 days, and 365 days after initiation of stimulants from Cox proportional hazard models. A secondary analysis assessed each component of the primary outcome separately.

RESULTS

Among 6457 older adults who initiated a prescription stimulant (ie, the exposed group) and 24 853 older adults who did not initiate such treatment (ie, the unexposed group), the distribution of baseline patient characteristics was well balanced after matching (sex: 3173 [49.1%] men vs 12 112 [48.7%] men; standardized difference, 0.01; median [IQR] age: 74 [69-80] years vs 74 [69-80] years; standardized difference, 0.01). Within this cohort, there were 932 CV events during the 365-day follow-up (5.11 events per 100 person-years among individuals who initiated stimulants). In the primary analysis, stimulant initiation was associated with increased risk of CV events at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8) but not at 180 days (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9-1.6) or 365 days (HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.8). In the secondary analysis, stimulant initiation was associated with increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.1-8.7) and stroke or TIA (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1) at 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study found that stimulant use was associated with an early increase in CV events among older adults with no association for long-term use.

A phase III double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study of dexamphetamine sulfate for fatigue in primary brain tumors patients: An ANOCEF trial (DXA)

Background

Most patients suffering from a primary brain tumor (PBT) complain of chronic fatigue affecting their quality of life (QOL). We hypothesized that dexamphetamine sulfate, a psychostimulant drug, could improve fatigue in PBT patients.

Methods

A double-blind, phase III, multi-institutional, placebo-controlled randomized trial (1:1 allocation) assessed the efficacy and tolerability of dexamphetamine at a dosage of 30 mg/day in PBT patients with stable disease who complained of severe fatigue, defined as a Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) score ≥60. The primary outcome was the variation of the MFI 20 score between inclusion and the evaluation at 3 months in nonprogressive patients. Mood, QOL and cognitive function were also evaluated.

Results

From April 2013 to November 2016, 46 patients were enrolled in the study, 41 of whom were evaluable for analysis (dexamphetamine group: 22; placebo group: 19). Tolerance was generally good, with no treatment-related deaths and no grade 4 toxicity. Patients in the dexamphetamine arm complained more frequently of psychiatric side effects (mostly hyperactivity, anxiety, sleep disorder, and irritability) than patients in the placebo arm (P = .018). There were no statistically significant differences at 3 months between the dexamphetamine and placebo arms in any of the outcomes (MFI-20, Norris Visual Analog Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30/BN 20), Marin’s Apathy Evaluation Scale, and cognitive evaluations).

Conclusion

Dexamphetamine at a dosage of up to 30 mg/day for 3 months has acceptable tolerability in PBT patients but does not improve fatigue, cognitive function, or QOL.

Effectiveness of integrated nursing interventions for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of integrated nursing interventions for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer.

Methods

Medline, Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically till June 2017. A systematic review was conducted to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on the effect of nurse-driven interventions to improve fatigue in patients with advanced cancer. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool.

Results

Six RCTs involving 736 adult participants were included. The fatigue intensity was improved significantly by nursing interventions. The analyzed results revealed significant improvements in the intervention group: less than 3 months (standard mean difference [SMD] = −0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] [−0.48, −0.19], P < 0.01) and more than or equal to 3 months (SMD = −0.40, 95% CI [−0.57, −0.24], P < 0.01). Four studies with a moderate risk of bias were judged, and the remaining studies were at high risk of bias.

Conclusions

The results indicate that integrated nursing interventions may relieve fatigue in patients with advanced cancer. However, due to the high risk of bias in most of the included studies and the diversity of interventions, the results and implementation process should be carefully monitored.

Long-term methylphenidate intake in chronic fatigue syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Concentration disturbances are frequent in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). In a placebo-controlled double-blind crossover study, methylphenidate over 4 weeks was superior to placebo in the relief of fatigue and concentration disturbance. This observational study describes the effect of long-term methylphenidate intake on fatigue, concentration, and daily life activities, as reported by the patients themselves.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to all CFS patients who were prescribed methylphenidate at the general internal medicine department of a university hospital between August 2004 and February 2007, for possible improvement of concentration difficulties and fatigue.

RESULTS

Out of 194 consecutive patients, 149 (76.8%) sent the questionnaire back. At the time of the questionnaire, 65.3% had stopped the intake of methylphenidate, 34.7% still took it daily or occasionally. Among the patients who continued methylphenidate, 48% reported an at least 50% improvement of fatigue, and 62% reported an at least 50% improvement of concentration difficulties. This continued intake of methylphenidate resulted in more working hours in these patients. Side effects (agitation, palpitations, and dry mouth) were reported significantly more in patients who had stopped methylphenidate than in those who still took it.

CONCLUSION

The long-term intake of methylphenidate by CFS patients with concentration difficulties has a positive effect in about one out of three patients.

Cancer-Related Fatigue, Version 2.2015

Cancer-related fatigue is defined as a distressing, persistent, subjective sense of physical, emotional, and/or cognitive tiredness or exhaustion related to cancer or cancer treatment that is not proportional to recent activity and interferes with usual functioning. It is one of the most common side effects in patients with cancer. Fatigue has been shown to be a consequence of active treatment, but it may also persist into posttreatment periods. Furthermore, difficulties in end-of-life care can be compounded by fatigue. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Cancer-Related Fatigue provide guidance on screening for fatigue and recommendations for interventions based on the stage of treatment. Interventions may include education and counseling, general strategies for the management of fatigue, and specific nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions. Fatigue is a frequently underreported complication in patients with cancer and, when reported, is responsible for reduced quality of life. Therefore, routine screening to identify fatigue is an important component in improving the quality of life for patients living with cancer.

Ongoing Screening and Treatment to Potentially Reduce Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Related Fatigue in Renal Cell Carcinoma

CONTEXT

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 1% to 4% of adult malignancies, and approximately 33% of patients with RCC present with metastatic disease and have a poor prognosis. Better understanding of RCC tumor biology has led to the development of several molecularly targeted agents, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), to manage advanced disease. Although evolving data suggest these drugs may be beneficial in RCC, they are associated with significant toxicities. Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most common toxicities associated with the TKIs used in RCC.

OBJECTIVES

To review the incidence, pathophysiology, and management of CRF in patients with RCC who are undergoing targeted therapy with TKIs.

METHODS

A comprehensive database search was performed using PubMed, Ovid, Embase, and MEDLINE. References of all cited articles also were reviewed. Data from articles published between 1975 and June 2014 were considered. A narrative review regarding the incidence, pathophysiology, and management of CRF in patients with RCC undergoing targeted therapy with TKIs was performed.

RESULTS

CRF is one of the most common TKI toxicities in patients with metastatic RCC and often is the dose-limiting toxicity. Management of TKI-related CRF can be difficult and may necessitate various nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions.

CONCLUSION

TKI-related CRF in patients with RCC is a highly distressing complication of cancer therapy. CRF can substantially influence drug compliance, the ability to maximally treat, and quality of life. It is important to recognize this common, yet frequently underdiagnosed complication and initiate appropriate management strategies, to increase the likelihood for optimal outcomes.

Psychiatric considerations in the oncology setting

An aging population and advances in diagnostics and treatment have resulted in a rapidly growing population of people impacted by cancer. People live longer after a cancer diagnosis and tolerate more aggressive treatments than in the past. Younger patients struggle with diversions from the normal developmental milestones in career and relationships, while older patients deal with the dual challenges of aging and cancer. Cancer's transition from likely death to survival has increased interest in its impact on psychosocial issues and quality of life, rather than just longevity. In this article, the authors review the psychiatric diagnosis and management of the mental health issues most often encountered in oncology. Oncology treatment teams, including oncologists, nurses, social workers, and other ancillary staff, are often on the front lines of addressing psychiatric distress and clinical syndromes when psychiatrists are not easily available. The purpose of this review article is to highlight opportunities for nonpsychiatrists to improve identification and treatment of psychosocial distress and psychiatric syndromes and to request formal psychiatric consultation in appropriate situations. Psychotherapeutic, psychopharmacologic, cognitive, and behavioral-oriented interventions, as well as supportive interventions, are discussed for treating patients who are facing challenges during active cancer treatment, survivorship, and at the end of life. This review is not exhaustive but highlights the more common psychosomatic medicine and palliative care scenarios that impact cancer patient care. The importance of recognizing and addressing burnout and compassion fatigue in multidisciplinary professionals who care for those treated for cancer is also discussed given the secondary impact this can have on patient care.

Efficacy of corticosteroids for cancer-related fatigue: A pilot randomized placebo-controlled trial of advanced cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common and one of the most important issues in palliative medicine, and it has been demonstrated to have a significant impact on patient quality of life (QoL). The present pilot randomized controlled study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of methylprednisolone (MP) for CRF in advanced cancer patients.

METHOD

Our study was planned as a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to an MP group, who received 32 mg/day of MP orally for 7 days, and a placebo group. The primary endpoint was an improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) score for fatigue from baseline to day 7. The secondary endpoints were improvements in appetite loss and QoL as well as evaluating the safety of corticosteroids as palliative therapy.

RESULTS

It was not possible to complete patient registration. In total, 35 patients were randomly assigned to an MP group (n = 18) and a placebo group (n = 17). The mean changes in VAS score for fatigue were -9.06 in the placebo group and -1.56 in the MP group, and for appetite loss -6.44 in the placebo group and -8.06 in the MP group. In addition, there was no evidence that methylprednisolone improved appetite loss or QoL compared to placebo. The incidence of adverse effects was not greater in the MP group. Significant of Result: We conclude that our sample size was too small to prove the efficacy of methylprednisolone in improving fatigue. Our results were reported as a pilot study performed to support a subsequent larger trial.

The use of stimulant medications for non-core aspects of ADHD and in other disorders

Psychostimulants play a central role in the management of ADHD. Here we review the evidence pertaining to the use of methylphenidate, dexamphetamine and related amphetamine salts, the prodrug lisdexamfetamine and modafinil for the management of comorbid ADHD and non-ADHD indications. There is a growing consensus that stimulant medications are helpful at improving the emotional dysregulation and lability, and oppositional and conduct symptoms that are often associated with ADHD. There is some evidence that psychostimulants may improve outcomes in those with treatment resistant depression, reduce negative symptoms and improve cognitive performance in schizophrenia, and that methylphenidate may reduce binge eating in those with bulimia nervosa. In general medicine, whilst the evidence is at times contradictory, psychostimulants have been shown in some studies to be effective treatments for chronic fatigue and narcolepsy, and to improve outcomes post stroke, post head injury, in dementia and various cancers. It seems likely that these effects often result from a combination of, reduction in fatigue, improvements in concentration and cognitive functioning and a lifting of mood which may be a direct or indirect consequence of the medication. Further studies seem warranted and these should focus on efficacy, effectiveness and long term safety. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'CNS Stimulants'.

Pharmacovigilance in oncology: pattern of spontaneous notifications, incidence of adverse drug reactions and under-reporting

The high toxicity and narrow therapeutic window of antineoplastic agents makes pharmacovigilance studies essential in oncology. The objectives of the current study were to analyze the pattern of spontaneous notifications of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in oncology patients and to analyze the incidence of ADRs reported by outpatients on antineoplastic treatment in a tertiary care teaching hospital. To compose the pattern of ADR, the notification forms of reactions in oncology patients in 2010 were reviewed, and the reactions were classified based on the drug involved, mechanism, causality, and severity. To evaluate the incidence of reactions, a questionnaire at the time of chemotherapy was included, and the severity was classified based on the Common Terminology Criteria. The profiles of the 10 responses reported to the Pharmacovigilance Sector were type B, severe, possible, and they were primarily related to platinum compounds and taxanes. When the incidence of reactions was analyzed, it was observed that nausea, alopecia, fatigue, diarrhea, and taste disturbance were the most frequently reported reactions by oncology patients, and the grade 3 and 4 reactions were not reported. Based on this analysis, it is proposed that health professionals should be trained regarding notifications and clinical pharmacists should increasingly be brought on board to reduce under-reporting of ADRs.

Managing patients with indolent lymphoma treated with bendamustine: a nursing perspective

Indolent lymphoma is one of the most frequently occurring subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Indolent NHL has a long natural history, and patients will likely receive multiple therapies during the course of their disease. Treatment options are rapidly evolving and, because oncology nurses play a major role in managing patients undergoing treatment for indolent NHL, they need to be aware of the potential adverse effects associated with new therapies that may affect patients in their care. One such agent is bendamustine, which was approved by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration in 2008 for the treatment of relapsed indolent NHL. Oncology nurses are increasingly likely to encounter bendamustine either as monotherapy or in combination with rituximab. Bendamustine is a hybrid agent with both alkylating and purine analog properties, produces a high response rate in patients with indolent NHL, and has manageable side effects that include immunosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, and fatigue. Oncology nurses should be familiar with the common side effects so as to provide enhanced care for the patient receiving this agent. This article reviews the safety profile of bendamustine and discusses the implications from a nursing perspective.

Using aggregated single patient (N-of-1) trials to determine the effectiveness of psychostimulants to reduce fatigue in advanced cancer patients: a rationale and protocol

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that 29% of deaths in Australia are caused by malignant disease each year and can be expected to increase with population ageing. In advanced cancer, the prevalence of fatigue is high at 70-90%, and can be related to the disease and/or the treatment. The negative impact of fatigue on function (physical, mental, social and spiritual) and quality of life is substantial for many palliative patients as well as their families/carers.

METHOD/DESIGN

This paper describes the design of single patient trials (n-of-1 s or SPTs) of a psychostimulant, methylphenidate hydrochloride (MPH) (5 mg bd), compared to placebo as a treatment for fatigue, with a population estimate of the benefit by the aggregation of multiple SPTs. Forty patients who have advanced cancer will be enrolled through specialist palliative care services in Australia. Patients will complete up to 3 cycles of treatment. Each cycle is 6 days long and has 3 days treatment and 3 days placebo. The order of treatment and placebo is randomly allocated for each cycle. The primary outcome is a reduction in fatigue severity as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-fatigue subscale (FACIT-F). Secondary outcomes include adverse events, quality of life, additional fatigue assessments, depression and Australian Karnovsky Performance Scale.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide high-level evidence using a novel methodological approach about the effectiveness of psychostimulants for cancer-related fatigue. If effective, the findings will guide clinical practice in reducing this prevalent condition to improve function and quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12609000794202.

Symptomatic treatment of interferon-α-induced depression in hepatitis C: a systematic review

Despite its efficacy in treating hepatitis C, interferon-α (IFN-α) can cause depression. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize and discuss the available and effective therapies in treating IFN-α-induced depression. Using PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, Ovid of Medline, PsycINFO, and ISI Web of Knowledge, we selected 64 articles concerning IFN-α-induced depression treatment in hepatitis C patients. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors can be considered the first choice for the treatment of IFN-α-induced depression, as demonstrated in open-label studies, case reports, and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Also 5-hydroxytryptophan and tryptophan have been suggested to be effective as monotherapy or as augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Clinical cases that show positive effects of tricyclic antidepressants, however, do not provide sufficient evidence for the use of these drugs. Two cohort studies have reported the effectiveness of amisulpride, but not of levosulpiride. Mirtazapine has been suggested to be a better choice of treatment in cases where insomnia or anorexia develop. Milnacipram can be useful in cases of concomitant medications, for the unlikely occurrence of drug-drug interactions. Psychostimulants represent an empirical treatment without controlled data to support their use. Two case reports have shown the favorable use of bupropion, particularly if sexual dysfunction or cravings for illicit drugs are present. A single case report suggests electroconvulsive therapy to be a possible choice when antidepressants are ineffective or poorly tolerated. The main limitation of our review is that the quality of the findings varied across the reviewed studies. Our observations may help clinicians with managing IFN-α-induced depression.

Supportive care of hematopoietic cell transplant patients

Hematopoietic cell transplant survivors face a number of challenges including low energy and stamina, "chemo-brain" and emotional distress, and late effects that can compromise functioning or lead to early mortality. This session will review the most recent interventions and recommendations to avoid or mitigate these complications.

Cancer-related fatigue: a review

Cancer-related fatigue is the most prevalent cancer symptom, reported in 50%-90% of patients and severely impacts quality of life and functional capacity. The condition remains underreported and often goes untreated. Guidelines suggest screening for fatigue at the initial visit, when the diagnosis of advanced disease is made, and at each chemotherapy session, as well as the identification of treatable contributing factors such as anemia, hypothyroidism, depression and sleep disorders. Brief assessment tools such as the Brief Fatigue Inventory or the Visual Analog Scale may be appropriate in the initial scoring of fatigue severity, but the initial approach to treatment usually requires a more comprehensive assessment, education, and the determination of an individualized treatment plan. Patients with moderate or severe fatigue may benefit from both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, whereas mild fatigue that does not interfere with quality of life can be treated with non-pharmacological measures alone. Non-pharmacological measures that have shown to be promising include cognitive-behavioral interventions such as energy conservation and activity management (ECAM), exercise and perhaps sleep therapy. Many other modalities may be beneficial and can be used on an individual basis, but there is insufficient evidence to promote any single treatment. Pharmacological therapies that have shown to be promising include the psycho-stimulants methylphenidate and dexmethylphenidate, modafinil (in severely fatigued patients only), and erythropoietin-stimulating agents in patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia and hemoglobin levels < 10 g/dL. Recently, our group reported impressive results with the use of the dry extract of Guarana (Paullinia cupana), with no significant side effects and at low cost, for the treatment of physical and mental cancer-related fatigue.

Effects of methylphenidate on fatigue and depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

CONTEXT

Fatigue is highly prevalent in populations with advanced illness and is often associated with depressed mood. The role of psychostimulant therapy in the treatment of these conditions remains ill defined.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the response of fatigue and depression in patients with advanced illness to titrated doses of methylphenidate (MP) as compared with placebo.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 30 hospice patients, both inpatients and outpatients, who had fatigue scores of at least four on a scale of zero to 10 (0=no fatigue and 10=worst fatigue), were randomly assigned to receive either 5mg of MP at 8 am and 1 pm or placebo. Doses of MP were titrated every three days according to response and adverse effects. Home care patients were monitored daily by telephone and visited by a research nurse on Study Days 0 (baseline), 3, 7, and 14. Fatigue was assessed using the Piper Fatigue Scale as the primary outcome measure and validated by the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) fatigue score. Subjects in inpatient facilities were interviewed or assessed by staff on an identical schedule. Depressive symptoms were assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory-II, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and the ESAS depression score. Primary statistical analysis was conducted using repeated-measures multivariate analysis of the variance.

RESULTS

Both MP- and placebo-treated groups had similar measures of fatigue at baseline. Patients taking MP were found to have significantly lower fatigue scores (Piper Fatigue Scale, Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue, and ESAS) at Day 14 compared with baseline. The improvement in fatigue with MP treatment was dose-dependent; the mean average effective dose was 10mg on Day 3 and 20mg on Day 14 (dose range of 10-40 mg). Placebo-treated individuals showed no significant improvement in fatigue. For patients with clinically significant depression on Day 0, treatment with MP was associated with a significant reduction in all test indices for depressed mood. For the placebo group, the changes in measures of depression were less than observed in the treatment group but were inconsistent between assessment tools. No significant toxicities were observed.

CONCLUSION

MP reduced symptoms of fatigue and depression when compared with placebo. The effect of MP on fatigue was dose-dependent and sustained over the duration of the study.

Methylphenidate: established and expanding roles in symptom management

Methylphenidate is a psychostimulant originally used for the treatment of attention-deficit disorder. Methylphenidate inhibits neuronal neurotransmitter transporters involved in the uptake of dopamine and norepinephrine at the level of the synapse. Inhibition of these transmitter transporters leads to increased concentrations of dopamine and norepinephrine in the synapse, which results in increasing alertness. The stimulant effect of methylphenidate has been used for the treatment of major depression, poststroke depression, cognitive enhancement in patients with brain tumors, neurodegenerative disorders, HIV disease, fatigue, and as a treatment for delirium and sedation associated with opioid use. Other areas where methylphenidate has been evaluated include gait disorders in the elderly individuals and the treatment of apathy in dementia. Analgesic effects have been demonstrated in preclinical models but true analgesic effects remain to be proven in humans. This article reviews the current use of methylphenidate for symptom management with a critical look at the evidence base for its efficacy in the conditions described.

Evaluation and management of fatigue in oncology: a multidimensional approach

Fatigue, one of the most common symptoms experienced by cancer patients, is multidimensional and is associated with significant impairment in functioning and overall quality of life. Although the precise pathophysiology of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is not well understood, a number of metabolic, cytokine, neurophysiologic, and endocrine changes have been described in these patients. A better understanding of these abnormalities is likely to lead to novel therapeutic interventions. Clinically, all patients presenting with significant fatigue should be evaluated for treatable conditions that might contribute to this symptom. Exercise and treatment of anemia are the two most established interventions for CRF. Psychostimulants seem promising based on early studies. Several complementary medicine treatments that showed efficacy in preliminary studies merit further testing.

Cancer-related fatigue: a practical review

Fatigue is an exceedingly common often treatable problem in cancer patients that profoundly affects all aspects of quality of life. Prevalence estimates have ranged from 50% to 90% of cancer patients overall. After addressing reversible or treatable contributing factors, such as hypothyroidism, anemia, sleep disturbance, pain, emotional distress, climacterium, medication adverse events, metabolic disturbances, or organ dysfunction such as heart failure, myopathy, and pulmonary fibrosis, patients may be screened with a brief fatigue self-assessment tool. All cancer patients should be screened regularly for fatigue. Those with moderate or severe fatigue may benefit from both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions, while mild fatigue that does not interfere with quality of life can be treated with nonpharmacologic measures alone. Physicians often have insufficient knowledge about fatigue and its treatments or underestimate the impact of fatigue on quality of life, while patients may consider it an unavoidable and untreatable side-effect and fear that reporting it may incite a change toward less aggressive cancer treatment. A practical review may therefore be useful to health care professionals in order to avoid the common barriers to its treatment that exist on the sides of both physicians and patients.

Fatigue in patients with advanced cancer

In recent years, as treatment options for cancer sufferers have become more successful but also more exhausting, fatigue has become increasingly distressing and extreme for these patients. Despite this, the assessment and management of fatigue is frequently overlooked by health-care professionals. This article will focus on the assessment and management of cancer-related fatigue in patients with advanced cancer, assessing the evidence base in order to guide practice in a subject that poses a particular challenge to palliative care practitioners.

Methylphenidate for fatigue in ambulatory men with prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Fatigue is a highly prevalent and clinically significant symptom of advanced prostate cancer. To date, however, there are no published controlled trials of interventions for fatigue in men with prostate cancer.

METHODS

This 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design evaluated the efficacy of methylphenidate to treat fatigue in prostate cancer patients. Inclusion criteria included men with advanced prostate cancer and the presence of moderate to severe fatigue. Patients with major depression, hypothyroidism, uncontrolled hypertension, arrhythmia, or anemia were excluded. Fatigue levels, blood pressure, pulse, and other safety concerns were monitored regularly.

RESULTS

Thirty-two subjects were randomized to methylphenidate (n=16) or placebo (n=16). Brief Fatigue Inventory total scores significantly decreased for both groups; however, the methylphenidate group, as compared with placebo, reported greater decrease on Brief Fatigue Inventory severity scores (P=.03) and a trend toward greater decrease on Brief Fatigue Inventory total scores (P=.07). A significantly greater number of subjects in the methylphenidate group versus the placebo group demonstrated clinically significant improvement in fatigue on total Brief Fatigue Inventory scores (7 of 10 vs 3 of 13) and Brief Fatigue Inventory severity scores (8 of 10 vs 3 of 13). Importantly, 6 subjects in the methylphenidate group discontinued because of increased blood pressure or tachycardia. There were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Methylphenidate is effective in treating fatigue in men with prostate cancer; however, oncologists need to monitor for possible pulse and blood pressure elevations.

Fatigue in children with cancer at the end of life

CONTEXT

Fatigue is a prevalent source of suffering in children with advanced cancer; yet, little is known about it.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe fatigue experienced by children with advanced cancer and to identify the factors associated with suffering from fatigue and its treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study of 141 parents of children who died of cancer (response rate: 64%) was conducted in two tertiary-level U.S. pediatric hospitals.

RESULTS

By parent report, 96% of children experienced fatigue in the last month of life. Nearly 50% experienced significant suffering from fatigue; this was associated with suffering from pain, dyspnea, anorexia, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, anxiety, sadness, or fear (P<0.05), and with side effects from pain or dyspnea treatment (P<0.05). In multivariate analysis of symptom-related factors, suffering from nausea/vomiting (odds ratio [OR]=3.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.23-12.61, P=0.02); anorexia (OR=7.52, 95% CI=1.87-30.25, P=0.005); and fear (OR=5.13, 95% CI=2.03-12.96, P ≤ 0.001) remained independently associated with fatigue. Children suffering from fatigue had primary oncologists with fewer years' experience than children who did not suffer from fatigue (mean=7.7 years, standard deviation [SD]=4.9 vs. mean of 9.9 years, SD=6.0, P=0.02). Among children with fatigue, 17 of 129 (13%) received fatigue-directed treatment, which was successful in 3 of 12 (25%). Children experiencing side effects from dyspnea or pain treatment were more likely to be treated for fatigue (relative risk=1.25, 95% CI=1.06-1.47, P=0.009).

CONCLUSION

Fatigue is a common source of suffering in children with cancer at the end of life. Palliation of this symptom is rarely successful. Increased attention to factors associated with fatigue and effective interventions to ameliorate fatigue are needed.

Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of long-acting methylphenidate for cancer-related fatigue: North Central Cancer Treatment Group NCCTG-N05C7 trial

PURPOSE

Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms experienced by patients with cancer. This trial was developed to evaluate the efficacy of long-acting methylphenidate for improving cancer-related fatigue and to assess its toxicities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adults with cancer were randomly assigned in a double-blinded manner to receive methylphenidate (target dose, 54 mg/d) or placebo for 4 weeks. The Brief Fatigue Inventory was the primary outcome measure, while secondary outcome measures included a Symptom Experience Diary (SED), the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Vitality Subscale, a linear analog self-assessment, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the Subject Global Impression of Change.

RESULTS

In total, 148 patients were enrolled. Using an area under the serum concentration-time curve analysis, there was no evidence that methylphenidate, as compared with placebo, improved the primary end point of cancer-related fatigue in this patient population (P = .35). Comparisons of secondary end points, including clinically significant changes in quality-of-life variables and cancer-related fatigue change from baseline, were similarly negative. However, a subset analysis suggested that patients with more severe fatigue and/or with more advanced disease did have some fatigue improvement with methylphenidate (eg, in patients with stage III or IV disease, the mean improvement in usual fatigue was 19.7 with methylphenidate v 2.1 with placebo; P = .02). There was a significant difference in self-reported toxicities (SED), with increased levels of nervousness and appetite loss in the methylphenidate arm.

CONCLUSION

This clinical trial was unable to support the primary prestudy hypothesis that the chosen long-acting methylphenidate product would decrease cancer-related fatigue.

Cancer-related fatigue: the approach and treatment

As the volume of cancer survivors continues to increase, clinicians are being faced with a growing number of patients with cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Survivors with a variety of malignancies may experience fatigue. Many potential barriers to the identification of this symptom in a cancer survivor may exist, due in part to both the patient and the clinician. Assessment of patients for fatigue is important because it can profoundly effect their daily lives. Many factors contribute to CRF. Hence, the clinician may face a daunting challenge in attempting to alleviate CRF. Treatment modalities for CRF include nonpharmacologic interventions, such as psychosocial interventions, exercise, sleep therapy, and acupuncture. Pharmacologic interventions include stimulants, namely modafinil and methylphenidate. In some patients antidepressants may be beneficial. Clinicians should assess cancer survivors for the presence of fatigue and focus on its treatment in an attempt to ensure that these patients have the best possible symptom control.

Cancer-related fatigue: central or peripheral?

To evaluate cancer-related fatigue (CRF) by objective measurements to determine if CRF is a more centrally or peripherally mediated disorder, cancer patients and matched noncancer controls completed a Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) and underwent neuromuscular testing. Cancer patients had fatigue measured by the BFI, were off chemotherapy and radiation (for more than four weeks), had a hemoglobin level higher than 10 g/dL, and were neither receiving antidepressants nor were depressed on a screening question. The controls were screened for depression and matched by age, gender, and body mass index. Neuromuscular testing involved a sustained submaximal elbow flexion contraction (SC) at 30% maximal level (30% maximum elbow flexion force). Endurance time (ET) was measured from the beginning of the SC to the time when participants could not maintain the SC. Evoked twitch force (TF), a measure of muscle fatigue, and compound action potential (M-wave), an assessment of neuromuscular-junction transmission were performed during the SC. Compared with controls, the CRF group had a higher BFI score (P<0.001), a shorter ET (P<0.001), and a greater TF with the SC (CRF>controls, P<0.05). This indicated less muscle fatigue. There was a greater TF (P<0.05) at the end of the SC, indicating greater central fatigue, in the CRF group, which failed to recruit muscle (to continue the SC), as well as the controls. M-Wave amplitude was lower in the CRF group than in the controls (P<0.01), indicating impaired neuromuscular junction conduction with CRF unrelated to central fatigue (M-wave amplitude did not change with SC). These data demonstrate that CRF patients exhibited greater central fatigue, indicated by shorter ET and less voluntary muscle recruitment during an SC relative to controls.

Cancer-related fatigue

CRF is indisputably a significant problem with important public health and medical economic implications. As the prevalence of cancer survivorship grows, the impact of CRF will increase. Physiatrists have not historically played an active role in caring for affected patients. In the author's opinion, this is unfortunate, since the holistic, integrated, and cross-disciplinary approach that characterizes physiatry seems ideally suited to offer patients meaningful benefit. Physiatrists with a clinical interest are likely to be robustly rewarded with interest from the oncological community, as CRF is a frustrating and devastating problem for patients and clinicians alike.

Methylphenidate side effects in advanced cancer: a retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Methylphenidate (MP) is often recommended for symptom control in advanced cancer. Little is known about its side effects in frail adults.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate MP-associated symptoms or side effects (S/E).

METHODS

Data was collected from 2 published prospective cohort series and a phase 2 study of MP for symptom control in advanced cancer. All 3 reports had identical dosing schedules and symptom assessments. Initial MP doses were 10 mg/d (5 mg at 8 AM and at 12 noon) titrated up to a maximum of 30 mg/d. Depression, fatigue, and symptoms identified as possible MP S/E were evaluated for presence (prevalence) and for severity (using categorical scales) before MP (day 0) and on days 3, 5, and 7 thereafter. The categorical scale used was none, mild, moderate, and severe.

RESULTS

62 patients were enrolled. Fifty completed 7 days of MP with a median age of 69 (range 30-90) years. Thirty-five received MP 10 mg/day. Most (96%) had improvement in depression and/or fatigue. Among the 62 patients, new symptom prevalence throughout the study was agitation (16%), insomnia (16%), dry mouth (15%), nausea (10%), tremors (6%), anorexia (5%), headache (3%), palpitations (2%), and vomiting (2%). Patients could have more than 1 symptom simultaneously. Seven (11%) withdrew due to MP S/E. Some symptoms present before MP showed significant improvement during MP therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Treatment with MP (10-20 mg/d) in advanced cancer is well tolerated. (2) S/E symptoms with MP appeared to improve spontaneously despite continued MP therapy. (3) Depression and fatigue improved at doses lower than those recommended in other clinical conditions. (4) MP improved depression and fatigue, and some secondary symptoms associated with them. Methylphenidate (MP) appears safe when used in the treatment of depression and fatigue in advanced cancer.

A pilot study evaluating the safety and efficacy of modafinal for cancer-related fatigue

BACKGROUND

Fatigue is a common symptom that lowers the quality of life of patients with cancer, affecting between 60% and 90% of patients. Relatively few options are available for the treatment of this debilitating condition. Modafinal, a psychostimulant developed for the treatment of narcolepsy, has been used to treat fatigue in other diseases such as multiple sclerosis, but little data support its use in cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN

The primary objective of this open-label pilot study was to evaluate the safety, and efficacy of modafinil in improving cancer-related fatigue (CRF) as measured by the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). The effect of this agent on depression, quality of life, functional status, and cognitive function was also assessed. Modafinal was self-administered at a dose of 100 mg/d during weeks 1-2, and 200 mg during weeks 3-4. Assessments were performed at baseline, 2, and 4 weeks.

RESULTS

BFI score was improved in 46% of patients at 2 weeks and 75% at 4 weeks (p = 0.025). Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores declined at 2 and 4 weeks (p < 0.001). Most scales for neurocognitive function were unchanged. Score for all Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-BR) subscales (measuring quality of life), except social/family well-being, were improved (p < 0.05) at 2 and 4 weeks. Significant changes in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status were noted, with 40% of patients improving at least one level. Modafinil was well-tolerated with only one patient discontinuing treatment due to drug-related toxicity.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study modafinil was well-tolerated and effective for fatigue in patients with cancer. Improvements were also seen in mood, quality of life, and functional status.

Methylphenidate for the treatment of depressive symptoms, including fatigue and apathy, in medically ill older adults and terminally ill adults

BACKGROUND

Depressive symptoms, fatigue, and apathy are common symptoms among medically ill older adults and patients with advanced disease, and have been associated with morbidity and mortality. Methylphenidate has been used to treat these symptoms because of its rapid effect. Despite the long history of methylphenidate use for the treatment of depressive symptoms, fatigue, and apathy, there is little definitive evidence to support its use.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper was to review the efficacy and tolerability of methylphenidate in the treatment of depressive symptoms, fatigue, and apathy in medically ill older adults and adults receiving palliative care.

METHODS

English-language articles presenting systematic reviews, clinical trials, or case series describing the use of methylphenidate for the treatment of depressive symptoms, fatigue, or apathy in medically ill older adults or adults receiving palliative care were identified. The key words methylphenidate and either depressive, depression, fatigue, or apathy were used to search the Cochrane Database, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. Included articles addressed depressive symptoms, fatigue, or apathy in (1) older adults (generally, age > or =65 years), particularly those with comorbid medical illness; (2) adults receiving palliative care; and (3) adults with other chronic illnesses. I excluded articles regarding treatment of depression in healthy young adults; bipolar disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; and narcolepsy, chronic fatigue syndrome, and related disorders.

RESULTS

A total of 19 controlled trials of methylphenidate in medically ill older adults or patients in palliative care were identified. Unfortunately, their conflicting results, small sample sizes, and poor methodologic quality limited the ability to draw inferences regarding the efficacy of methylphenidate, although evidence of tolerability was stronger. The available evidence suggests possible effectiveness of methylphenidate for depressive symptoms, fatigue, and apathy in various medically ill populations.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of definitive evidence of effectiveness, trials of low-dose methylphenidate in medically ill adults with depression, fatigue, or apathy, with monitoring for response and adverse effects, are appropriate.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessing the impact of dexamphetamine on fatigue in patients with advanced cancer

Fatigue is very common in patients with cancer. Current guidelines suggest that psychostimulants are "reasonable to consider for severe fatigue." This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the hypothesis that dexamphetamine in fatigued patients with advanced cancer would produce a clinically significant improvement with minimal side effects. Fifty patients with advanced cancer, who were receiving palliative care, were randomized to dexamphetamine 10mg twice daily or placebo for eight days. Effectiveness was assessed using the Brief Fatigue Inventory and the McGill Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. The side effects were recorded. The results were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The baseline demographics, fatigue levels, and quality-of-life scores were similar between the two arms. Patients were elderly, had impaired performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score=3), and were taking a range of neurologically active medications. Thirty-nine patients completed the trial. There was a transient improvement in the fatigue levels on day 2, but no significant difference in fatigue (P=0.267) or quality of life (P=0.579) by the end of the study. Statistical modeling did not reveal any significant predictors of response to dexamphetamine. These results suggest that dexamphetamine 20mg daily, although well tolerated, does not significantly improve fatigue or quality of life in patients with advanced cancer, as measured by the selected instruments.

Fatigue in cancer: a review of literature

Fatigue is a common symptom of advanced cancer limiting one's activity and affecting the quality of life. It is a multidimensional symptom complex with subjective and objective components. Hence, its definition and assessment seems arbitrary, incomplete, and elusive. Components of fatigue often merge with other 'disease states' as anemia, depression and so on, compounding difficulty to assess it separately. Fatigue has a high prevalence rate, and lasts longer in chronic diseases like cancer. Its association with treatment modalities like chemotherapy, radiotherapy alongside the primary disease process makes it seemingly ubiquitous in many cases. Systemic manifestation of cancer causes excess demand on body resources on cell repair, uncontrolled growth with metabolite accumulation causing fatigue. Co-morbid conditions of organic and psychological nature causes fatigue. There are many assessment tools for fatigue with different uses and objectives, simple and reproducible tools like Brief Fatigue Inventory, Edmonton Symptom assessment scale seem feasible in everyday practice. Management of fatigue is not straightforward and rewarding. Although treatment of cause appears to be an attractive option, it is not possible in all cases. Therapeutic agents targeting cytokine load is in early stages of study and available results are not favorable. Specific measures aimed at pain relief, prevention/treatment of sepsis, management of depression, avoidance of drugs causing fatigue, restoring the metabolic profile are important. Methyl phenidate, megestrol, and modafinil are some drugs with promising effect to treat fatigue, though confirmatory studies are yet to be established. Non-pharmacological methods are also helpful. Forewarning patients on upcoming fatigue, active regular exercise, and stress management are some of them. Fatigue being a multidimensional entity, single mode of therapy is insufficient. Combined modality tailored to individual patient need and understanding may be the right way to battle this ill-understood symptom. This review article examines the etiopathogenesis and management strategies of fatigue in cancer.

Cancer fatigue: a review for psychiatrists

OBJECTIVE

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a ubiquitous and debilitating phenomenon for patients both during and after treatment for cancer of all types. This review will outline the complex neurobiological mechanisms underlying CRF and their relevance to various treatment routes. It will cover aspects of screening, diagnosis and treatment, including both pharmacological and behavioral interventions for CRF. The goal of the article was not to perform a comprehensive literature review or meta-analysis, but rather to integrate clinically relevant information from different areas of research related to cancer fatigue, including etiology, diagnosis and management for a nonspecialist audience.

METHOD

The methodology used involved broadly surveying the literature available on Medline using such search terms as "cancer," "fatigue," "cytokine" and "depression," exploring relevant articles over the past 15 years and relevant citations from these articles and focusing on recent advances in the study of CRF.

RESULTS

CRF occurs at high prevalence rates during and subsequent to cancer treatment. Multidisciplinary approaches are available for the assessment and management of fatigue including underlying contributory factors.

CONCLUSIONS

An increasing base for evidence is present to guide the management of CRF. Additional research is warranted to understand the neurobiological mechanisms, etiology and risk factors for fatigue.

[Management of cancer-related fatigue]

INTRODUCTION

Cancer-related fatigue is very common but its management remains frustrating. We thus sought to review current knowledge in this field: epidemiologic data, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, and treatment.

METHODS

We queried the Medline database for all articles on this topic published between 1997 and 2007 and analyzed the articles published in English and French, as well as some of the essential earlier work.

RESULTS

Approximately 60 to 96% of patients treated for cancer report fatigue. The prevalence of fatigue that persists after the disease is considered to be in remission is substantial. Fatigue is a multidimensional problem with biological, psychological, social, and personal aspects. Physical causes must be systematically considered (comorbidities, anemia, and endocrine disorders), but most cases remain unresolved. Many may be attributed to deconditioning. There is not now any pharmacological therapy that treats this symptom effectively. Some psychostimulants are being tested, but the initial results of the studies are contradictory. Exercise is the intervention for which there is the most evidence of effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Cancer-related fatigue is a very common symptom for which no specific cause can usually be identified. In this situation, rest may be more harmful than exercise.

Fatigue in palliative care patients -- an EAPC approach

Fatigue is one of the most frequent symptoms in palliative care patients, reported in .80% of cancer patients and in up to 99% of patients following radio- or chemotherapy. Fatigue also plays a major role in palliative care for noncancer patients, with large percentages of patients with HIV, multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure reporting fatigue. This paper presents the position of an expert working group of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC), evaluating the available evidence on diagnosis and treatment of fatigue in palliative care patients and providing the basis for future discussions. As the expert group feels that culture and language influence the approach to fatigue in different European countries, a focus was on cultural issues in the assessment and treatment of fatigue in palliative care. As a working definition, fatigue was defined as a subjective feeling of tiredness, weakness or lack of energy. Qualitative differences between fatigue in cancer patients and in healthy controls have been proposed, but these differences seem to be only an expression of the overwhelming intensity of cancer-related fatigue. The pathophysiology of fatigue in palliative care patients is not fully understood. For a systematic approach, primary fatigue, most probably related to high load of proinflammatory cytokines and secondary fatigue from concurrent syndromes and comorbidities may be differentiated. Fatigue is generally recognized as a multidimensional construct, with a physical and cognitive dimension acknowledged by all authors. As fatigue is an inherent word only in the English and French language, but not in other European languages, screening for fatigue should include questions on weakness as a paraphrase for the physical dimension and on tiredness as a paraphrase for the cognitive dimension. Treatment of fatigue should include causal interventions for secondary fatigue and symptomatic treatment with pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Strong evidence has been accumulated that aerobic exercise will reduce fatigue levels in cancer survivors and patients receiving cancer treatment. In the final stage of life, fatigue may provide protection and shielding from suffering for the patient and thus treatment may be detrimental. Identification of the time point, where treatment of fatigue is no longer indicated is important to alleviate distress at the end of life.

The elusive concept of the symptom cluster

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To provide an integration and synthesis of literature on the definition and importance of the symptom cluster, theoretical frameworks to explain it, analysis strategies to identify it, interventions to alleviate it, and suggestions for future research.

DATA SOURCES

A literature review from 1995-2007 was conducted using MEDLINE. Clinical guidelines, descriptive research, intervention studies of multiple symptoms, and theoretical and conceptual articles were examined. Articles were reviewed if at least two of the four symptoms of interest were examined in relation to one or more other symptoms. Conceptual models were included if they explained or allowed for the notion of a symptom cluster.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Four symptoms were examined as a candidate symptom cluster for this analysis: fatigue, insomnia, pain, and depression. Symptom clusters were identified by expert opinion, group comparisons, shared variance among symptoms (including factor analysis and mediation analysis), identification of subgroups, influence of symptoms on patient outcomes, or the identification of a common underlying mechanism. Regardless of the method chosen for identifying a symptom cluster, the substantial evidence showed that various combinations of the target symptoms formed a symptom cluster.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the findings suggest that fatigue, insomnia, pain, and depression constitute a viable cluster for further study, more research is needed to define the cluster and describe its underlying mechanisms. Addressing multiple symptoms is beneficial in reducing negative patient outcomes; however, more work needs to be done to understand the efficacy of intervention for symptom clusters.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

When conducting symptom assessment, healthcare providers should address the four symptoms (fatigue, insomnia, pain, and depression) targeted in this review because evidence of clustering exists. Guidelines provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for fatigue and distress provide algorithms and decision trees for assessment and management.

Fatigue: implications for the elderly

Sporadic and chronic fatigue are common, but an underlying etiology is identified in only up to 10% of cases. Under-reporting makes fatigue's prevalence unknown. Some estimate up to 50% of elders suffer from mild fatigue. Causes vary, but prevailing theory links most fatigue as a secondary consequence to illness and medication. Fatigue is prominently linked to sleep disorders, depression, heart disease, Parkinson's disease, anemia, and cancer. Fatigue and its consequences should be assessed routinely. Empiric treatment is the norm, focusing on managing fatigue, and, when possible, selecting agents with fewer side effects. Exercise, diet, and promoting good sleep hygiene have beneficial effects in symptom management.