"If we don't speak the language, we aren't offered the same opportunities": Qualitative perspectives of palliative care access for women of color living with advanced breast cancer

Context

Despite efforts to enhance equity, disparities in early palliative care (PC) access for historically minoritized patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) persist. Insight into patient and clinician perspectives are needed to inform future models aimed at improving equity in PC access and outcomes.

Objectives

To explore qualitative barriers and facilitators to early PC access in an urban setting with Black and Latina women with ABC.

Methods

In this qualitative descriptive study, we conducted one-on-one interviews with Black and Latina women with ABC (N = 20) and interdisciplinary clinicians (N = 20) between February 2022 and February 2023. Participants were recruited from urban academic and community cancer clinics. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive coding and thematic analysis approach.

Results

Barriers identified by both patients and clinicians included lack of communication between oncology, PC, and primary care teams, limited understanding of PC among patients and non-PC clinicians, language and health literacy-related communication challenges, and racism and marginalization, including implicit bias and lack of diverse racial/ethnic representation in the supportive care workforce. Facilitators identified by both patients and clinicians included patient-to-patient referrals, support groups breaking cultural stigma on topics including self-advocacy and PC, referrals from trusted providers, and community organizations' abilities to overcome challenges related to social determinants of health, most specifically logistical and financial support.

Conclusions

Patients and clinicians reported similar barriers and facilitators to PC access, most commonly through the lens of care coordination and communication. These findings will inform future adaptation of a culturally and linguistically care model to improve access to early PC services for Black and Latina women with ABC.

Telephone advice lines for adults with advanced illness and their family carers: a qualitative analysis and novel practical framework

BACKGROUND

Telephone advice lines have been recommended internationally to support around-the-clock care for people living at home with advanced illness. While they undoubtedly support care, there is little evidence about what elements are needed for success. A national picture is needed to understand, improve and standardise service delivery/care.

AIM

To explore telephone advice lines for people living at home with advanced illness across the four UK nations, and to construct a practical framework to improve services.

DESIGN

A cross-national evaluation of telephone advice lines using structured qualitative interviews. A patient and public involvement workshop was conducted to refine the framework.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Professionals with responsibilities for how palliative care services are delivered and/or funded at a local or regional level, were purposively sampled.

RESULTS

Seventy-one interviews were conducted, covering 60 geographical areas. Five themes were identified. Availability: Ten advice line models were described. Variation led to confusion about who to call and when. Accessibility, awareness and promotion: It was assumed that patients/carers know who to call out-of-hours, but often they did not. Practicalities: Call handlers skills/expertise varied, which influenced how calls were managed. Possible responses ranged from signposting to organising home visits. Integration/continuity of care: Integration between care providers was limited by electronic medical records access/information sharing. Service structure/commissioning: Sustained funding was often an issue for charitably funded organisations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our novel evidence-based practical framework could be transformative for service design/delivery, as it presents key considerations relating to the various elements of advice lines that may impact on the patient/carer experience.

Unlocking timely palliative care: assessing referral practices and barriers at a ghanaian teaching hospital

BACKGROUND

The need for primary care physicians to be heavily involved in the provision of palliative care is growing. International agencies and practice standards advocate for early palliative care and the use of specialized palliative care services for patients with life-threatening illnesses. This study was conducted to investigate physicians' referral practices and perceived barriers to timely referral at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study design was employed using a convenience sampling technique to recruit 153 physicians for the study. Data on socio-demography, referral practices, timing and perceived barriers were collected using a structured questionnaire. Binary Logistic regression using crude and adjusted odds was performed to determine the factors associated with late referral. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The prevalence of late referral was reported to be 68.0%. There were poor referral practices among physicians to palliative care services, and the major barriers to late referral were attributed to the perception that referring to a palliative care specialist means that the physician has abandoned his patient and family members' decisions and physicians' personnel choices or opinions on palliative care.

CONCLUSION

The healthcare system needs tailored interventions targeted at improving physicians' knowledge and communication strategies, as well as tackling systemic deficiencies to facilitate early and appropriate palliative care referrals. It is recommended that educational programs be implemented, palliative care training be integrated into medical curricula and culturally sensitive approaches be developed to address misconceptions surrounding end-of-life care.

Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perceptions of Palliative Care that Influence Access and Use: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis

Objective: Benefits of integration of palliative care early in the trajectory of a patient's serious illness are well established in the literature. Yet, barriers to palliative care access in the US continue to exist. The purpose of this study is to synthesize existing qualitative data of patient, caregiver, and clinician perceptions of palliative care (PC) that influence PC access and use in the US. Methods: A formal qualitative meta-synthesis was completed. The meta-synthesis included 1) a systematic literature search of qualitative studies conducted from 2016 to 2021, 2) a critical appraisal of the included studies, and 3) a reciprocal translation of the study's findings through an interpretive thematic analysis. Results: Seven articles met inclusion criteria resulting in a sample size of patients (n=18), caregivers (n=15), and clinicians (n=118). Three themes emerged with associated subthemes: knowledge and opinions of PC (subthemes of patient and caregiver knowledge and awareness and clinician knowledge and beliefs); care coordination and collaboration (subthemes of communication and trust); and social and structural drivers (subthemes of socioeconomic demographics and time and resources). Conclusions: This qualitative meta-synthesis identifies barriers and facilitators to palliative care access and use. The study findings illuminate the commonalities and differences of the perceptions of the three key stakeholder groups. In addition, this qualitative meta-synthesis reveals the complexities within the US healthcare system, and the challenges patients and their caregivers face accessing PC.

Meaning of Hospice Care: Perceptions of Patients and Families

Background: About half of hospice-eligible adults die without hospice each year. Misconceptions about hospice are frequently identified as barriers to utilization, but hospice perceptions are not well documented. Objectives and Setting/Subjects: To examine perceptions of hospice (initial and post-enrollment) among 90 U.S. patients/families actively enrolled in a large, metropolitan hospice in Texas, and to identify factors associated with participant perceptions. Design and Measurement: Concurrent mixed methods and cross-sectional design collecting data via research questionnaire with Likert scales and open-ended questions. Wilcoxon signed-rank test determined differences between recall of initial hospice perceptions at time of referral and perceptions while actively receiving services; Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to examine bivariate relationships between perceptions of hospice and satisfaction with physician communication and demographic variables. Qualitative statements were analyzed using an inductive, content analysis approach. Results: There was a significant difference between participants' perceptions of hospice recalled from initial conversations compared with current perceptions following hospice enrollment (z = -6.44, P < .01). Initial perceptions of hospice were significantly related to satisfaction with physician communication (P = .011) and diagnosis (P = .019). Qualitative themes range from negative (ie hospice = death) to positive (ie comfort, support, loving staff) with 65.6% of participants demonstrating positive increases in understanding. Conclusion: Participants' perceptions of hospice were positively associated with satisfaction with physician communication prior to hospice enrollment, and potentially impacted by the experience of care itself. During hospice discussions, clinicians should elicit patient and family perceptions in addition to providing descriptions of eligibility and services.

Quality of referrals to specialist palliative care and remote patient triage - a cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

Choosing the optimal moment for admission to palliative care remains a serious challenge, as it requires a systematic identification of persons with supportive care needs. Despite the screening tools available for referring physicians, revealing the essential information for preliminary admission triage is crucial for an undisturbed qualification process. The study was aimed at analysing the eligibility criteria for specialist palliative care disclosed within provided referrals, expanded when necessary by documentation and/or interview.

METHODS

Referral forms with the documentation of 300 patients consecutively referred to the non-profit in-patient ward and home-care team in Poland were analysed in light of prognosis, phase of the disease and supportive needs.

RESULTS

Half of the referrals had the sufficient information to make a justified preliminary qualification based solely on the delivered documentation. The majority lacked performance status or expected prognosis. Where some information was revealed, two-thirds were in a progressing phase of the disease, with a within-weeks life prognosis. In 53.7%, no particular reason for admission was given. Social problems were signalled as the only reason for the admission in 7.7%. Twenty-eight percent were labelled as "urgent"; however, 52.4% of them were triaged as "stable" or disqualified. Patients referred to a hospice ward received complete referral forms more often, containing all necessary information.

CONCLUSIONS

General physicians need practical tips to facilitate timely referrals and unburden the overloaded specialist palliative care. Dedicated referral forms extended by a checklist of typical patients' concerns should be disseminated for better use of these resources.

Specialist and Primary Physicians' Experiences and Perspectives of Collaboration While Caring for Palliative Patients-A Qualitative Study

Increasing numbers of people living with chronic and life-limiting diseases are actualising a greater need for palliative care. Physicians are an important provider for identifying the need for palliation, and effective follow-up requires physician collaboration across different service levels. This study aimed to explore and describe how physicians in hospitals and municipalities experience their roles and interactions in the care of palliative patients. Pair interviews were performed with seven physicians working in hospitals, primary care and nursing homes in Mid-Norway. Systematic text condensation was used to analyse the data, resulting in three main themes: The boundaries of palliative care, Alternating understandings of roles and Absence of planning. The physicians' interactions with palliative patients appeared as a fragmented distribution of tasks rather than a real collaboration with shared responsibility. At both levels, the physicians seemed to assume withdrawn roles as a reaction to unclear and unspoken expectations and to avoid interfering with others' responsibilities. Moreover, their understanding of palliative care and which groups should be included varied. Realising a collaboration between physicians that is beneficial for both patients and physicians, greater openness and real arenas for discussion and decision-making support are required.

Differences in Palliative Care Provision by Primary and Specialist Providers Supporting Patients With COVID-19: A Qualitative Study

Objectives: To describe the delivery of palliative care by primary providers (PP) and specialist providers (SP) to hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods: PP and SP completed interviews about their experiences providing palliative care. Results were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Twenty-one physicians (11 SP, 10 PP) were interviewed. Six thematic categories emerged. Care provision: PP and SP described their support of care discussions, symptom management, managing end of life, and care withdrawal. Patients provided care: PP described patients at end of life, with comfort-focused goals; SP included patients seeking life-prolonging treatments. Approach to symptom management: SP described comfort, and PP discomfort in providing opioids with survival-focused goals. Goals of care: SP felt these conversations were code status-focused. Supporting family: both groups indicated difficulties engaging families due to visitor restrictions; SP also outlined challenges in managing family grief and need to advocate for family at the bedside. Care coordination: internist PP and SP described difficulties supporting those leaving the hospital. Conclusion: PP and SP may have a different approach to care, which may affect consistency and quality of care.

"You cannot stop talking about palliative care:" Perspectives and Learnings from Providers on Communicating about Home-based Palliative Care to Patients and Physicians

BACKGROUND

Home-based palliative care (HBPC) programs are proliferating across the U.S, yet face significant, documented challenges in promoting uptake of services and sustaining sufficient patient referrals. There is a huge need to understand effective methods for engaging physicians, patients, and caregivers in palliative care. Thus, the purpose of this study was to elicit successful practices on how to best communicate about HBPC to both healthcare providers and patients/caregivers.

METHOD

Focus groups with nine California-based HBPC organizations were conducted between January and April 2020. Discussions lasted approximately 54 minutes, were guided by a semi-structured protocol, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes and codes from the data.

RESULTS

Twenty-five interdisciplinary HBPC staff members participated in a focus group. Most identified as white (76%), female (76%), and working in their current position for 5 years or less (56%). Three themes were identified from the data: (1) value of relationships; (2) communication do's and don'ts; and (3) need for education. Participants discussed actionable recommendations for each theme.

DISCUSSION

Study findings highlight several successful practices for HBPC programs to communicate- and foster relationships with healthcare professionals and patients/families about palliative care, with education at the crux. Lessons learned about key words and phrases to say and to avoid are particularly valuable for budding HBPC programs. Our results suggest that HBPC providers exert enormous efforts to increase patient referrals and enrollment through strategic, continuous outreach and education to physicians, patients, and their caregivers; however, palliative care educational interventions are needed.

Palliative care knowledge, attitudes, and experiences amongst patients with bladder cancer and their caregivers

OBJECTIVES

Palliative care is underutilized amongst patients with bladder cancer despite guideline recommendations and known benefits. In order to uncover potential access barriers, we sought to describe patient and caregiver knowledge, attitudes and experiences surrounding palliative care.

METHODS

We surveyed 272 patients with bladder cancer and their caregivers through the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Patient Survey Network. In addition to collecting demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics, previously studied and validated questionnaires on palliative care knowledge and beliefs were administered. Patients and caregivers were also queried regarding their experiences with palliative care consultation.

RESULTS

Survey respondents demonstrated highly accurate knowledge of palliative care services. Attitudes and beliefs surrounding palliative care were overall positive. Caregivers demonstrated better knowledge and more positive beliefs of palliative care compared to patients. Despite an overall positive sentiment toward palliative care, only 9% of the cohort had palliative care consultation as part of their cancer treatment plan. Most patients with muscle-invasive or metastatic bladder cancer wished that palliative care had been discussed by their providers.

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of bladder cancer patients possess accurate knowledge and positive beliefs of palliative care. Palliative care is infrequently discussed during the treatment of bladder cancer, with patients and their caregivers expressing desire for palliative care to be discussed more often. Provider education surrounding palliative care services is imperative to improving access for bladder cancer patients and caregivers.

A Tale of Two Trials: A Comparative Case Study of Successful versus Terminated Home-Based Palliative Care Trials

Background: In 2007 we published a trial of home-based palliative care (HBPC) conducted in a managed care organization (MCO) that found significant improvements in patient satisfaction with health care, rates of home deaths, and reductions in health care use and costs. A decade later, we undertook a similar trial of HBPC within accountable care organizations (ACOs) funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. This trial tested the same model using similar eligibility criteria and recruitment strategies as the earlier trial, yet it failed to achieve its enrollment targets. Objectives: To understand key differences in the trials that contributed to the success of one and failure of the other. Methods: We conducted a comparative case study of the original MCO HBPC trial and the subsequent ACO HBPC trial. Two researchers familiar with both trials reviewed both quantitative and qualitative data obtained from previous analyses and publications to develop a rich, in-depth understanding of each study. Results: We identified four differences that explain in large part why the ACO trial failed while the MCO trial succeeded. These differences center on the trials' setting, target populations, outreach strategies, and providers' understanding of palliative care. Discussion: Our findings demonstrate the challenges in conducting research in complex health care systems and how physician and setting structures along with target population and lack of general palliative care knowledge can influence the success of research. Conclusion: Future HBPC trials must consider the strengths and weaknesses of trial design factors when partnering with multiple health care organizations. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03128060.

Palliative care models for patients living with advanced cancer: a narrative review for the emergency department clinician

Eighty-one percent of persons living with cancer have an emergency department (ED) visit within the last 6 months of life. Many cancer patients in the ED are at an advanced stage with high symptom burden and complex needs, and over half is admitted to an inpatient setting. Innovative models of care have been developed to provide high quality, ambulatory, and home-based care to persons living with serious, life-limiting illness, such as advanced cancer. New care models can be divided into a number of categories based on either prognosis (e.g., greater than or less than 6 months), or level of care (e.g., lower versus higher intensity needs, such as intravenous pain/nausea medication or frequent monitoring), and goals of care (e.g., cancer-directed treatment versus symptom-focused care only). We performed a narrative review to (1) compare models of care for seriously ill cancer patients in the ED and (2) examine factors that may hasten or impede wider dissemination of these models.

Identifying barriers and facilitators to palliative care integration in the management of hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Palliative care is well suited to support patients hospitalized with COVID-19, but integration into care has been variable and generally poor.

AIM

To understand barriers and facilitators of palliative care integration for hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

Internists, Intensivists and palliative care physicians completed semi-structured interviews about their experiences providing care to patients with COVID-19. Results were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-three physicians (13 specialist palliative care, five intensivists, five general internists) were interviewed; mean ± SD age was 42 ± 11 years and 61% were female. Six thematic categories were described including: patient and family factors, palliative care knowledge, primary provider factors, COVID-19 specific factors, palliative care service factors, and leadership and culture factors. Patient and family factors included patient prognosis, characteristics that implied prognosis (i.e., age, etc.), and goals of care. Palliative care knowledge included confidence in primary palliative care skills, misperception that COVID-19 is not a 'palliative diagnosis', and the need to choose quantity or quality of life in COVID-19 management. Primary provider factors included available time, attitude, and reimbursement. COVID-19 specific factors were COVID-19 as an impetus to act, uncertain illness trajectory, treatments and outcomes, and infection control measures. Palliative care service factors were accessibility, adaptability, and previous successful relationships. Leadership and culture factors included government-mandated support, presence at COVID planning tables, and institutional and unit culture.

CONCLUSION

The study findings highlight the need for leadership support for formal integrated models of palliative care for patients with COVID-19, a palliative care role in pandemic planning, and educational initiatives with primary palliative care providers.

Home-Based Palliative Care Team Perspectives on Challenges in Patient Referral and Enrollment

CONTEXT

As funding for home-based palliative care continues to expand, there is an increasing need to understand barriers to patient referral to and acceptance of home-based palliative care.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to elicit perspectives of home-based palliative care administrators and providers on barriers encountered in identification, referral, and enrollment of patients eligible for home-based palliative care.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study employing focus groups of nine home-based palliative care agencies across California. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed. Using thematic analysis, researchers independently coded the transcripts and identified themes from the codes.

RESULTS

A total of 25 HBPC staff participated in the nine focus groups. Participants included both clinicians (n = 17) and administrators (n = 8). Our analysis revealed 13 themes that fit under four major thematic categories: 1) lack of formal payment structures (few HBPC payors and variation in payment and services among payors), 2) agency structure barriers (limitations of electronic medical records and multiple lines of business), 3) patient- and family-level barriers (misconceptions and/or lack of palliative care knowledge, uninformed of the referral and/or no warm hand-off, reluctance to have strangers in the home, overwhelmed with health issues and related services, HBPC service refusal/unresponsive to outreach), and 4) physician-level barriers (misconceptions and/or lack of palliative care knowledge, variability in HBPC payment and services, lack of time, patient ownership).

CONCLUSION

HBPC providers identified a myriad of barriers that preclude patient access to HBPC. With growing provision of HBPC services, greater efforts to overcome these barriers are needed.

"By the time she got sick it was just kind of too late": A qualitative study on advanced care planning among bereaved lesbian, gay, and bisexual older women

BACKGROUND

Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) older women have unmet communication needs around palliative and end-of-life care. Past research has found communication differences for LGB women patients. Consequently, older LGB women may experience healthcare communication barriers around advance care planning.

AIM

To explore experiences of bereaved LGB older women to understand perspectives regarding advance care planning communication between clinicians, patients, and dyads.

DESIGN

Guided by queer gerontology as a theoretical framework, this qualitative descriptive study employed individual interviews with purposively recruited participants. Interviews were conducted in person using a semi structured protocol and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Sixteen LGB women, age 60 years or older from across the United States who had lost a spouse/partner within the past 5 years.

RESULTS

Four main themes emerged from the transcripts, LGB older women: (1) experience unclear advance care planning communication and end-of-life care support from clinicians, (2) often avoid advance care planning discussions with spouse or partners, (3) lack of knowledge about palliative or end-of-life care, and (4) have more positive experiences when there is consistent communication with spouse or partner and clinicians during a spouse/partner's illness and end-of-life.

DISCUSSION

While certain experiences and opinions may reflect those of non-LGB older adults, novel advance care planning barriers exist for LGB older women. Greater understanding among clinicians is needed regarding advance care planning conversations with LGB dyads. We recommend four improvements in training, recognition, acceptance, and dyad-based communication interventions.

Reluctance to Accept Palliative Care and Recommendations for Improvement: Findings From Semi-Structured Interviews With Patients and Caregivers

BACKGROUND

Despite some insurance plans now paying for home-based palliative care, recent reports have suggested that insurance coverage for palliative care may be insufficient in expanding patient access to home-based palliative care.

AIM

To identify patients' and caregivers' perceived barriers to home-based palliative care and their recommendations for overcoming these barriers.

DESIGN

We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured individual interviews. Our interview protocol elicited participants' perspectives on home-based palliative care services; positive and negative aspects of the palliative program explanation; and suggestions for improving messaging around home-based palliative care.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five participants (patients, proxies, and their caregivers) who were eligible for a randomized controlled trial of home-based palliative care were interviewed by telephone.

RESULTS

Themes related to home-based palliative care referral barriers included reluctance to have home visits, enrollment timing, lack of palliative care knowledge, misconceptions about palliative care, and patients' self-perceived health condition. Themes related to recommendations for overcoming these obstacles included ensuring that palliative care referrals come from healthcare providers or insurance companies and presenting palliative care services more clearly.

CONCLUSION

Findings reinforce the need for additional palliative care education among patients with serious illness (and their caregivers) and the importance of delivering palliative care information and referrals from trusted sources.

Advances in systemic therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer related mortality worldwide. Despite numerous advances in treatments over the past decade, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains an incurable disease for most patients. The optimal treatment for all patients with locally advanced, but surgically resectable, NSCLC contains at least chemoradiation. Trimodality treatment with surgical resection has been a subject of debate for decades. For patients with unresectable or inoperable locally advanced disease, the incorporation of immunotherapy consolidation after chemoradiation has defined a new standard of care. For decades, the standard of care treatment for advanced stage NSCLC included only cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, with the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, the landscape of treatment has rapidly evolved. This review discusses the integration of these innovative therapies in the management of patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC.