1
|
Harrington J, Rao VN, Leyva M, Oakes M, Mentz RJ, Bosworth HB, Pagidipati NJ. Improving Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Review of Implementation Strategies. J Card Fail 2024; 30:376-390. [PMID: 38142886 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
Despite recent advances in the use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), achievement of target GDMT use and up-titration to goal dosages continue to be modest. In recent years, a number of interventional approaches to improve the usage of GDMT have been published, but many are limited by single-center experiences with small sample sizes. However, strategies including the use of multidisciplinary teams, dedicated GDMT titration algorithms and clinician audits with feedback have shown promise. There remains a critical need for large, rigorous trials to assess the utility of differing interventions to improve the use and titration of GDMT in HFrEF. Here, we review existing literature in GDMT implementation for those with HFrEF and discuss future directions and considerations in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine Harrington
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Duke University, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
| | - Vishal N Rao
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Duke University, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Monica Leyva
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC
| | - Megan Oakes
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC
| | - Robert J Mentz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Duke University, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Hayden B Bosworth
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Duke University, Durham, NC; Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC
| | - Neha J Pagidipati
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Duke University, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng J, Mednick T, Heidenreich PA, Sandhu AT. Pharmacist- and Nurse-Led Medical Optimization in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Card Fail 2023; 29:1000-1013. [PMID: 37004867 PMCID: PMC10524094 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditional approaches to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) management often lead to delayed initiation and titration of therapies in patients with heart failure. This study sought to characterize alternative models of care involving nonphysician provider-led GDMT interventions and their associations with therapy use and clinical outcomes. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing nonphysician provider-led GDMT initiation and/or uptitration interventions vs usual physician care (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022334661). We queried PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform for peer-reviewed studies from database inception to July 31, 2022. In the meta-analysis, we used RCT data only and leveraged random-effects models to estimate pooled outcomes. Primary outcomes were GDMT initiation and titration to target dosages by therapeutic class. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and HF hospitalizations. RESULTS We reviewed 33 studies, of which 17 (52%) were randomized controlled trials with median follow-ups of 6 months; 14 (82%) trials evaluated nurse interventions, and the remainder assessed pharmacists' interventions. The primary analysis pooled data from 16 RCTs, which enrolled 5268 patients. Pooled risk ratios (RR) for renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) and beta-blocker initiation were 2.09 (95% CI 1.05-4.16; I2 = 68%) and 1.91 (95% CI1.35-2.70; I2 = 37%), respectively. Outcomes were similar for uptitration of RASI (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.24-3.20; I2 = 77%) and beta-blocker (RR 2.22, 95% CI 1.29-3.83; I2 = 66%). No association was found with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist initiation (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.47-2.19). There were lower rates of mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67-1.04; I2 = 12%) and hospitalization due to HF (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.01; I2 = 25%) across intervention arms, but these differences were small and not statistically significant. Prediction intervals were wide due to moderate-to-high heterogeneity across trial populations and interventions. Subgroup analyses by provider type did not show significant effect modification. CONCLUSIONS Pharmacist- and nurse-led interventions for GDMT initiation and/or uptitration improved guideline concordance. Further research evaluating newer therapies and titration strategies integrated with pharmacist- and/or nurse-based care may be valuable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jimmy Zheng
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
| | - Thomas Mednick
- Sutter Health, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Paul A Heidenreich
- Division of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Alexander T Sandhu
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fudim M, Sayeed S, Xu H, Matsouaka RA, Heidenreich PA, Velazquez EJ, Yancy CW, Fonarow GC, Hernandez AF, DeVore AD. Representativeness of the PIONEER-HF Clinical Trial Population in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. Circ Heart Fail 2020; 13:e006645. [DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.119.006645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background:
In PIONEER-HF (Comparison of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Enalapril on Effect on NT-pro BNP in Patients Stabilized From an Acute Heart Failure Episode), the in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) was well-tolerated and led to improved outcomes. We aim to determine the representativeness of the PIONEER-HF trial among patients hospitalized for ADHF using real-world data.
Methods:
The study population was derived from all patients discharged alive for ADHF in the Get With The Guidelines—HF registry from 2006 to 2018 with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; all HFrEF with ADHF). We then determined the proportion of patients meeting PIONEER-HF eligibility criteria (PIONEER-HF eligible) and those meeting a set of limited eligibility criteria (actionable cohort). Rates of HF readmissions and all-cause mortality were then compared between the all HFrEF with ADHF, PIONEER-HF eligible, and actionable cohorts using linked Medicare claims data.
Results:
A total of 99 767 patients with HFrEF in Get With The Guidelines—HF were hospitalized for ADHF. PIONEER-HF inclusion criteria were met by 71 633 (71.8%) patients, and both inclusion and exclusion criteria were met by 20 704 (20.8%) patients. Further, 68 739 (68.9%) patients met the criteria for the actionable cohort. Among the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid—linked patients, the HF rehospitalization rate at 1 year was 35.1% (95% CI, 34.5–35.8) for all HFrEF with ADHF patients, 32.6% (95% CI, 31.3–33.9) for the PIONEER-HF eligible cohort, and 33.1% (95% CI, 32.3–33.9) for the actionable cohort. The 1-year all-cause mortality was 36.7% (95% CI, 36.1–7.4) for all HFrEF with ADHF patients, 31.6% (95% CI, 30.3–32.9) for the PIONEER-HF eligible cohort, and 32.2% (95% CI, 31.4–33.0) for the actionable cohort.
Conclusions:
Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes for patients eligible for PIONEER-HF only modestly differ when compared with those encountered in routine practice, suggesting that the in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan should be routinely considered for patients with HFrEF hospitalized for ADHF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marat Fudim
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (M.F., S.S., A.F.H., A.D.D.)
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.F., A.F.H., A.D.D.)
| | - Sabina Sayeed
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (M.F., S.S., A.F.H., A.D.D.)
| | - Haolin Xu
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC (H.X., R.A.M.)
| | - Roland A. Matsouaka
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC (H.X., R.A.M.)
| | - Paul A. Heidenreich
- Section of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA (P.A.H.)
| | | | - Clyde W. Yancy
- Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (C.W.Y.)
| | - Gregg C. Fonarow
- Division of Cardiology, Ahmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center (G.C.F.)
| | - Adrian F. Hernandez
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (M.F., S.S., A.F.H., A.D.D.)
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.F., A.F.H., A.D.D.)
| | - Adam D. DeVore
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (M.F., S.S., A.F.H., A.D.D.)
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.F., A.F.H., A.D.D.)
| |
Collapse
|