Calcium channel blockers and treatment of hypertension

Acute decrease of cardio-ankle vascular index with the administration of beraprost sodium

AIM

A novel arterial stiffness index, the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), has been proposed. To clarify the properties of CAVI, the effects of beraprost sodium (BPS), a prostaglandin (PG) I2 analogue, which has a potent vasodilating effect, on CAVI were studied and comparing with brachialankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Male volunteers (n=18, 46.3±4.2 yr) were enrolled in this study and administered BPS (40 µg). CAVI and baPWV were measured every hour for 4 hours.

RESULTS

When BPS was administered to 18 healthy volunteers, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure fluctuated slightly, but the means did not change. CAVI significantly decreased in the 1st hour from 8.3±0.34 (mean±SE) to 7.9±0.34 (p<0.05) and this decrease persisted for 3 hours, whereas baPWV did not significantly change. ΔbaPWV each time was significantly correlated with both Δsystolic blood pressure and Δdiastolic blood pressure, but ΔCAVI did not correlate with either Δsystolic blood pressure (r=-0.12, p=0.38) or Δdiastolc blood pressure (r=-0.22, p=0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Beraprost sodium did not decrease blood pressure, but decreased CAVI, whereas baPWV did not change. These results indicate that CAVI partly reflected the contraction of arterial smooth muscle cells.

Contradictory effects of β1- and α1- aderenergic receptor blockers on cardio-ankle vascular stiffness index (CAVI)--CAVI independent of blood pressure

AIM

The cardio-ankle vascular stiffness index (CAVI) is a new parameter that reflects the stiffness of the aorta, femoral artery and tibial artery as a whole. One of its conspicuous features is that CAVI is independent of blood pressure at measuring time, theoretically. But, it has not been experimentally proved yet. For confirmation, pharmacological studies were performed comparing with brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV).

METHODS

Used drugs were a β1-adrenoceptor blocker, metoprorol and an α1- adrenoceptor blocker doxazosin. Both were administered to 12 healthy volunteer men. CAVI and baPWV were measured every one hour for 6 hours using VaSera.

RESULTS

When metoprolol (80 mg) was administered to 12 healthy volunteer men, systolic blood pressure decreased from 131.4 ± 4.5 to 118.3 ± 4.1 mmHg (mean ± SE) (p < 0.05) at the 3rd hour, and diastolic blood pressure decreased from 85.3 ± 4.0 to 75.3 ± 3.0 mm Hg (p < 0.05). baP-WV decreased from 13.93 ± 0.46 to 12.46 ± 0.49 m/sec (p < 0.05), significantly, but CAVI did not change (8.16 ± 0.29 to 8.24 ± 0.27) (p = 0.449). ΔbaPWV at each time was significantly correlated with both Δsystolic and Δdiastolic blood pressures, but ΔCAVI was not correlated with either Δblood pressure. When doxazosin (4 mg) was administered to the same men, systolic blood pressure decreased from 130.2 ± 4.6 to 117.2 ± 4.8 mmHg (p < 0.05) at the 3rd hour. Diastolic blood pressure also decreased from 85.1 ± 4.1 to 74.2 ± 3.9 mmHg (p < 0.05). baPWV decreased from 13.98 ± 0.68 to 12.25 ± 0.53 m/sec (p < 0.05), significantly. CAVI also decreased from 8.15 ± 0.28 to 7.18 ± 0.37 (p < 0.05), significantly.

CONCLUSION

These results suggested that CAVI was not affected by blood pressure at the measuring time directly, but affected by the changes of contractility of smooth muscle cells.

Metabolic effects in rats of verapamil alone and in combination with captopril

The metabolic effects of verapamil alone and in combination with captopril were investigated in rats. Animals received the maximum recommended doses for humans (per kg body weight per day) over a 2-week period. Verapamil had no significant effects on serum biochemistry, but caused a significant increase in serum potassium level and significant reductions in the rates of intestinal absorption of glucose and calcium. Verapamil/captopril had a number of significant effects on serum lipid profile (increased total cholesterol, increased HDL-cholesterol, and reduced LDL-cholesterol), and also provoked an increase in serum alanine amino-transferase activity and in serum glucose levels. The combination treatment caused a significant increase in serum chloride levels, but had no effect on intestinal absorption.

Intravenous nicardipine in severe systemic hypertension

Sixty-six patients with severe hypertension were treated with intravenous nicardipine in 3 separate protocols. Each protocol had a common end point: Diastolic blood pressure would either reduce 25 mm Hg or measure below 95 mm Hg. Each of the 66 patients studied attained the desired clinical response end point. Intravenous nicardipine produced a gradual reduction in blood pressure, was effective in maintaining blood pressure control during constant infusion and had few undesirable effects. These observations suggest that intravenous nicardipine maybe a useful addition to a limited number of therapeutic agents currently available to the physician for treatment of hypertensive urgencies.

Calcium-channel blockers in acute myocardial infarction

The calcium-channel blockers are useful in treating a variety of cardiovascular disorders. Due to their antiischemic and spasmolytic properties, these agents have been studied in the prophylaxis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction. This article reviews this application with respect to reduction of mortality, infarct size, and reinfarction rate. Of the agents currently available for clinical use, nifedipine has been studied most extensively. This agent shows no beneficial effects in this setting and its use may in fact be harmful. Of the few trials that have been conducted with verapamil, none have shown decreased mortality. Verapamil may reduce infarct size although further confirmation is required. Diltiazem is the only agent that has been shown to have short- and long-term benefits in the patient with acute myocardial infarction. Proper patient selection is of utmost importance in ensuring successful therapy. In particular, those patients with non-Q-wave infarctions and/or normal left ventricular function can be expected to derive the most benefit in terms of reducing mortality and reinfarction rate associated with the acute event.

Calcium metabolism, calcium-channel blocking agents, and hypertension management

Increasing evidence has suggested that a disturbance of cellular calcium metabolism may have a role in initiating and maintaining elevated systemic vascular resistance in essential hypertension. Controversy exists over whether calcium can alleviate or exacerbate the hypertensive process, and diversity of calcium metabolism in hypertensive patients has been proposed. Calcium-channel blocking agents are potent vasodilators capable of correcting the elevated systemic vascular resistance. Clinical studies have shown that these drugs have antihypertensive efficacy comparable to established agents. The elderly, blacks, and patients with low renin activity respond well to calcium-channel blockers. These drugs may also offer potential advantages over established antihypertensive agents in patients with other coexisting diseases. Sustained release formulations have been developed, and initial experience with long-term efficacy and tolerability is encouraging. The calcium-channel blockers may become first-line therapy for treatment of hypertension in selected patients.

Intravenous nicardipine for the treatment of severe hypertension

PURPOSE

Severe hypertension responds to treatment with nifedipine given orally or sublingually. Nicardipine hydrochloride, a water soluble dihydropyridine analogue similar to nifedipine, has less of a negative ionotropic effect and produces less reflex tachycardia than nifedipine. Our purpose was to assess the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of intravenous nicardipine in a group of patients with severe hypertension (defined as a supine diastolic blood pressure of more than 120 mm Hg).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients with severe hypertension received treatment with intravenous nicardipine. Nicardipine titration was performed using doses of 4 to 15 mg/hour to achieve therapeutic goal (diastolic blood pressure 95 mm Hg or less or decrease in diastolic blood pressure of more than 25 mm Hg). After this therapeutic end-point was reached, patients received maintainance therapy with nicardipine for varying lengths of time: one hour (Group I), six hours (Group II), or 24 hours. When blood pressure control was lost, patients in Groups I and II entered a second maintenance period lasting a maximum of 24 hours. Onset and offset of action of nicardipine at various infusion rates and times of infusion were measured.

RESULTS

Onset time to achieve therapeutic response was rapid at 15 mg/hour (0.31 +/- 0.13 hours) when compared with lower doses (1.11 +/- 0.36 hours at 4 mg/hour; 0.54 +/- 0.09 hours at 5 mg/hour; 0.52 +/- 0.09 hours at 7 to 7.5 mg/hour). Those who showed a therapeutic response received maintenance infusions with nicardipine for one (n = 7), six (n = 6), or 24 (n = 5) hours. Sustained blood pressure control at a constant rate of nicardipine infusion was seen in all patients during the maintenance period. After discontinuation of nicardipine, the time for offset of action (increase in diastolic blood pressure of 10 mm Hg or more) was independent of duration of infusion. Decreases in both systolic and diastolic pressures correlated well with plasma nicardipine levels. Heart rate increased by about 10 beats/minute, but this increase did not correlate with plasma nicardipine levels. Side effects were minimal, consisting of headache and flushing. In seven patients, local phlebitis developed at the site of infusion. This occurred after at least 14 hours of infusion at a single site, and the incidence can probably be reduced by shortening the infusion time at a single site.

CONCLUSION

Nicardipine appears to be a safe and effective drug for intravenous use in the treatment of severe hypertension.