Muromonab-CD3 and antithymocyte globulin in renal transplantation

The use of monoclonal antibodies in immune-mediated hematologic disorders

In this article, the evidence on the clinical use of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of immune-mediated hematologic disorders is described. Insights into pathogenic mechanisms have revealed a major role of both B and T cells. Controlled trials have shown conflicting results, necessitating further research regarding pathogenesis, mechanism of action, and resistance. Although the use of more potent and specific monoclonal antibody therapy, mainly targeting costimulation signals, may improve response rates and long-term outcome, its use should be carefully balanced against potential side effects.

Pharmacologic approaches to composite tissue allograft

This article discusses the pharmacologic approaches and the most promising new compounds for composite tissue allograft tolerance. Although some approaches rely on a combination of immunosuppressive agents that act synergistically against rejection, other strategies use immunologic manipulation, including major histocompatibility complex matching, induction of chimerism, and use of monoclonal antibodies to abrogate the immune response. There is still a need, however, to reproduce these findings in species phylogenetically closer to humans. This may be the target of future research efforts, which may overcome the challenge of limb and face transplant rejection.

Immunosuppressive therapy for paediatric transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations

Immunosuppressive therapy in paediatric transplant recipients is changing as a consequence of the increasing number of available immunosuppressive agents. Generic and other new formulations are now emerging onto the market, clinical experience is growing, and it is expected that clinicians should tailor immunosuppressive protocols to individual patients by optimising dosages and drugs according to the maturation and clinical status of the child. Most information about the clinical pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs in paediatrics is centred on cyclosporin, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal and liver transplant recipients; data regarding other immunosuppressants and transplant types are limited. Although the clinical pharmacokinetics of these drugs in paediatric transplant recipients are still under investigation, it is evident that the pharmacokinetic parameters observed in adults may not be applicable to children, especially in younger age groups. In general, patients younger than 5 years old show higher clearance rates irrespective of the organ transplanted or drug used. Another important factor that frequently affects clearance in this patient population is the post-transplant time. In accordance with these findings, and in contrast with the usual under-dosage in children, the need for higher dosages in younger recipients and during the early post-transplant period seems evident. To achieve the best compromise between prevention of rejection and toxicity, dosage individualisation is required and this can be achieved through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This approach is particularly useful to ensure the cost-effective management of paediatric transplant recipients in whom the pharmacokinetic behaviour, target concentrations for clinical use and optimal dosage strategies of a particular drug may not yet be well defined. Although TDM may be a tool for improving immunosuppressive therapy, there is little information concerning its positive contribution to clinical events, including outcomes, for paediatric patients. Substantial information to support the use of TDM exists for cyclosporin and, to a lesser extent, for tacrolimus, but a diversity of options affects their implementation in the clinical setting. The role of TDM in therapy with mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus has yet to be defined regarding both methods and clinical indications. Pharmacodynamic monitoring appears more suited to other immunosuppressants such as azathioprine, corticosteroids and monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies. If coupled with pharmacokinetic measurements, such monitoring would allow earlier and more precise optimisation of therapy. Very few population pharmacokinetic studies have been carried out in paediatric transplant patients. This type of study is needed so that techniques such as Bayesian forecasting can be applied to optimise immunosuppressive therapy in paediatric transplant patients.

Muromonab-CD3-induced neurotoxicity: report of two siblings, one of whom had subsequent cyclosporin-induced neurotoxicity

Muromonab-CD3 is widely used for immunosuppression in patients undergoing solid organ transplant. We report two siblings with oligomeganephronia and end-stage renal disease who developed encephalopathy and seizures from muromonab-CD3 following renal transplant. The first case is a 13-year-old girl who developed encephalopathy, seizure, and triparesis following renal transplant while muromonab-CD3 was used for immunosuppression. The second case was the 6-year-old sister of the first case, who also developed recurrent focal seizures while she was on muromonab-CD3 for renal transplant immunosuppression. In both cases, a sequential brain magnetic resonance image (MRI) showed progression of abnormalities from the cerebral cortex to the white matter. In the first case, the MRI normalized after muromonab-CD3 was discontinued. In the second case, the patient developed a leukoencephalopathy following cyclosporin administration. The pathophysiology of muromonab-CD3 encephalopathy is believed to be a disturbance to the blood-brain barrier mediated by cytokine release from lymphocyte stimulation by muromonab-CD3. Because the major histocompatibility complex genes are known to regulate cytokine responses, it is possible that the excessive production of cytokines that causes encephalopathy may occur in patients who share close major histocompatibility complex genes. Muromonab-CD3 in a patient whose sibling has developed cerebral complications from its use should be administered with caution. The second case suggests that muromonab-CD3 encephalopathy predisposes patients to develop cyclosporin neurotoxicity. Because the pathogenesis of muromonab-CD3 encephalopathy and cyclosporin-related cerebral complications are both potentially mediated through a disturbance of the blood-brain barrier, it is possible that one agent may predispose a patient to the complication of the other.

Immunosuppressive agents in transplantation: mechanisms of action and current anti-rejection strategies

Over the past century, the concept of interfering with the immune response at various sites by blocking the formation, stimulation, proliferation, and differentiation of lymphocytes has led to relentless development of new immunosuppressive drugs. These agents are associated with reduced risk of short- and long-term toxicity and have dramatically improved allograft and patient survival, especially in recipients of solid organ transplants. Current protocols in such patients are nearly all calcineurin-inhibitor based, using cyclosporine or tacrolimus, as part of dual, triple, or sequential therapy. This review focuses on agents currently in clinical use at transplant centers in United States. The drugs are described in terms of their basic mechanisms of action, therapeutic uses, clinical studies, and adverse effects. In addition, the efficacy and toxicity of a few promising new therapeutic approaches are examined. Finally, important challenges regarding pharmacological immunosuppression as it relates to solid organ and composite tissue allotransplantation are discussed.

Overview of transplantation immunology and the pharmacotherapy of adult solid organ transplant recipients: focus on immunosuppression

A review of transplantation immunology is discussed with emphasis on alloantigen presentation, T-lymphocyte activation and proliferation, and the immune effector mechanisms responsible for allograft rejection. Immunosuppressive pharmacology is introduced beginning with conventional medications (cyclosporine, azathioprine, and corticosteroids) followed by a discussion of drugs recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and the interleukin-2 receptor antagonists). In addition, drugs that are used in the treatment of transplant rejection or as rescue therapy are discussed (muromonab-CD3, antithymocyte globulin, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and corticosteroids). Throughout, implications for nurses involved in the pharmacotherapy of transplant recipients are discussed.

Renal transplantation

There has been an increase in the transplantation of kidneys from living, genetically unrelated donors and from extended criteria cadaver donors. The past policies about paid renal donors are being reconsidered. Techniques have been developed to reduce morbidity for the living renal donor. The variety of immunosuppressants allows individuation of therapy. Guidelines for conception and pregnancy have been established.

New immunosuppressive strategies

Discovery of novel biological and pharmaceutical agents directed against discrete molecular targets in the lympnocyte activation sequence has enabled the effective control of graft rejection by the use of combinatorial immunosuppressive therapy. Chimeric and humanized monoclonal antibodies against T-cell receptor CD3 complex chains or the IL-2 receptor block T-cell function without inducing activation, and do not cause the cytokine release syndrome of first generation products. Biological blockade of co-stimulatory molecules including CD40L and CD28 produces immunological allograft unresponsiveness in primates, though this effect is not yet proven in humans. Heterogeneity in clinical response to pharmaceutical agents is often explained by pharmacokinetic factors of absorption, metabolism and elimination. The use of microemulsion technology has increased the absorption and efficacy of cyclosporine in all organ transplants, so that there is little difference in efficacy between this agent and tacrolimus. Mycophenolate mofetil is not maximally effective alone, but significantly reduces the relative risk of acute rejection in combination with an immunophilin binding agent. It is also effective when introduced at the time of rejection. Whether it can replace other agents for maintenance immunosuppression is now under investigation. Sirolimus, the latest pharmaceutical agent to complete phase III trials, acts to inhibit IL-2 driven lymphocyte proliferation and reduces the risk of acute rejection to below 20%. Multiple pharmacokinetic interactions occur within and between these agents, so that pharmacokinetic monitoring is increasingly important. At present there are few tools to detect pharmacodynamic interactions, although reporter gene constructs and intracellular cytokine labeling offer exciting possibilities for biological monitoring. Despite these advances, none of these interventions confers demonstrable long-term benefit in graft survival or function. Acute rejection can not therefore be assumed to be a simple surrogate for chronic injury, and research must be re-focused to determine the relevant targets for long-term immunosuppression.

False increase in C-reactive protein attributable to heterophilic antibodies in two renal transplant patients treated with rabbit antilymphocyte globulin

Increased serum C-reactive protein (sCRP) is a sensitive marker of renal graft rejection. We describe the cases of two children with uncomplicated renal transplantation who had false-positive sCRP values on analyzers using rabbit anti-CRP but values within the reference range with anti-CRP from other animal species. Cross-reaction with heterophilic antibodies was suggested by clinical and biological signs of serum sickness and daily treatment with rabbit antilymphocyte globulin (ALG). The interference depended on the serum concentration of the cross-reactant and was removed by subtotal IgG adsorption to Protein A or Protein G or by immunoadsorption using rabbit ALG or total IgG in non-immune rabbit serum. Anti-rabbit IgG and IgM antibodies were detected in both patients. These are the first reported cases of cross-reaction with heterophilic antibodies in a turbidimetric CRP assay.