Arthrodesis After Failed Total Ankle Replacement

Custom Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Titanium Truss Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Implants for Failed Total Ankle Replacements: Classification, Technical Tips, and Treatment Algorithm

BACKGROUND

The management of failed total ankle replacements, with significant loss of bone stock, is challenging with high rates of complications and associated morbidity. Recent technological advances have enabled the development of patient-customized 3D-printed titanium truss arthrodesis implants, which offer an alternative salvage option for failed total ankle replacements.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed of 6 cases of failed total ankle replacements that were managed using custom patient-specific 3D-printed titanium truss arthrodesis implants. Technical tips, classification, and a treatment algorithm were developed based on our initial experience.

RESULTS

Between November 2018 and March 2022, 6 patients underwent arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacements. Follow-up was available for all cases. The mean follow-up was 3.0 years (range 1-4.5). The mean MOXFQ Index improved from 73.1 to 32.3 (P < .05). The mean EQ-5D-5L Index improved from 0.366 to 0.743 (P < .05) and the EQ-VAS also improved from 53.0 to 63.3 (P = .36). The mean VAS-Pain score at final follow-up was 27.5. There were no cases of nonunion. None of the patients were smokers. The overall complication rate was 50%. Two patients returned to surgery: one for wound washout following TAR explantation and a second for removal of metalwork 2 years following surgery for a prosthetic joint infection secondary to hematogenous spread. No patients underwent revision fixation or amputation.

CONCLUSION

Custom patient-specific 3D-printed titanium truss arthrodesis implants are a viable treatment option for failed total ankle replacements.

The use of a 3D printed titanium implant for arthrodesis in the management of large osseous defects in the ankle

BACKGROUND

Large osseous defects (LOD) in the ankle occur because of multiple aetiologies. Advancement in 3-dimensional (3D) printing technologies has led to the use of custom implants and instrumentation their management. A 3D printed patient-specific porous titanium cage which allows for peripheral osteo-integration and autogenous bone-grafting could be an ideal implant in these cases.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a multi-centre, multi-surgeon consecutive cohort of patients requiring either TTC or AA for a large osseous defect between June 2019 - August 2020. A custom titanium prosthesis was 3D-printed according to CT measurements for implantation.

RESULTS

Mean follow up was 19.5 months (range 12-24 months). Plain radiographs and CT scans at 12 months confirmed osseointegration (stability) in 11of 13 patients (84%). Two patients developed late infection, one requiring revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

3D-Printed titanium implants in the management of LODs in the ankle offer a comparable success rate to other reported procedures, with unlimited geometric possibilities in the design allowing for accurate length correction. Their structural stability may offer an advantage over conventional bone graft techniques and limits the amount of bone-graft required.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

LOE III.

Republication of "Total Ankle Replacement Conversion to Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With Bulk Femoral Head Allograft and Pseudoelastic Intramedullary Nail Providing Sustained Joint Compression"

Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis is commonly performed to salvage a failed total ankle replacement. These salvage procedures are complicated by significant bone loss from the ankle replacement and are associated with low patient satisfaction. Here, we describe 2 cases of patients who presented with a failed total ankle replacement and underwent arthrodesis using a bulk femoral head allograft and a novel pseudoelastic intramedullary nail. The intramedullary nail contains an internal pseudoelastic element that adapts to bone resorption and settling allowing for compression to be maintained at the arthrodesis sites throughout healing. In the first case, a 65-year-old woman with a failed total ankle replacement underwent TTC arthrodesis. The second case involved an obese 53-year-old woman who had previously undergone 2 total ankle replacement procedures that resulted in unsuccessful outcomes. In both cases, union was demonstrated on computed tomographic scan by 6 months. At 2 years postsurgery, both patients were satisfied with the procedure. These cases provide preliminary evidence that tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a pseudoelastic IM nail and structural allograft is an appropriate treatment for failed total ankle replacements. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic, case series.

CT-Verified Union Rate Following Arthrodesis of Ankle, Hindfoot, or Midfoot: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Ankle, hindfoot, and midfoot arthrodesis surgeries are standard procedures performed in orthopaedics to treat pain and functional disabilities. Although fusions can effectively improve pain and quality of life, nonunions remain a significant concern for surgeons. With the increased availability of computed tomography (CT), more surgeons rely on this modality for increased accuracy in determining whether a fusion was successful. The objective of this study was to report the rates of CT-confirmed fusion following ankle, hindfoot, or midfoot arthrodesis.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane central register from January 2000 to March 2020. Inclusion criteria included studies with adults (<18 years) that received 1 or multiple fusions of the ankle, hindfoot, or midfoot. At least 75% of the study cohort must have been evaluated by CT postoperatively. Basic information was collected, including journal, author, year published, and level of evidence. Other specific information was collected, including patient risk factors, fusion site, surgical technique and fixation, adjuncts, union rates, criteria for successful fusion (%), and time of CT. Once data were collected, a descriptive and comparative analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Included studies (26, n = 1300) had an overall CT-confirmed fusion rate of 78.7% (69.6-87.7). Individual joints had an overall fusion rate of 83.0% (73-92.9). The highest rate of union was in the talonavicular joint (TNJ).

CONCLUSION

These values are lower than previous studies, which found the same procedures to have greater than 90% fusion rates. With these updated figures, as confirmed by CT, surgeons will have better information for clinical decision making and when having informed consent conversations.

Ten-Year Follow-Up of a Customized Total Talar Prosthesis for Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Case Report

CASE

A 74-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis had undergone total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) for severe ankle joint destruction at our hospital 14 years earlier. Radiographs of the ankle revealed displacement of the tibial component and subsidence of the talar component. Revision TAA was performed using a customized alumina ceramic total talar prosthesis.

CONCLUSION

The 10-year outcome of revision TAA with a total talar prosthesis was satisfactory, with no postoperative complications, such as displacement of the tibial component, dislocation of alumina ceramic artificial talus, or progression of degenerative changes in the talonavicular and subtalar joints.

Management of Periprosthetic Bone Cysts After Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Modern improvements in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) have increased the performance of this procedure for treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. A common finding after TAA is the formation of periprosthetic bone cysts, which can be clinically silent or result in TAA failure. The exact cause of periprosthetic bones cysts has not been established, but major theories are related to osteolysis secondary to implant wear, micromotion, and stress shielding. Treatment can be nonoperative with clinical observation for small, asymptomatic cysts. Large, progressive, and symptomatic cysts often merit surgical treatment with debridement and grafting, revision TAA, or salvage arthrodesis.

Revision tibiotalar arthrodesis with posterior iliac autograft after failed arthroplasty: A matched comparative study with primary ankle arthrodeses

INTRODUCTION

Tibiotalar arthrodeses performed after failed ankle arthroplasties are known to be complex procedures with often disappointing functional outcomes. This study reports the results of a revision technique using a posterior iliac crest autograft.

HYPOTHESES

We hypothesized that: (1) revision tibiotalar arthrodeses (RTTAs) had functional outcomes which were similar to those of a reference cohort of primary tibiotalar arthrodeses (TTAs) and that (2) the union rate was satisfactory.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study compared 16 RTTAs performed for failed arthroplasties that caused pain and a functional disability (4 aseptic loosening, 4 massive progressive periprosthetic cysts, 5 malpositioning of implants, and 3 cases of unexplained mechanical pain) with a series of 16 primary TTAs performed for painful ankle osteoarthritis. The groups were matched at a 1:1 ratio for age, sex, side and body mass index. The preoperative workup included a physical exam, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, weight bearing radiographs, CT and SPECT scans. Outcomes were assessed both clinically (AOFAS score) and radiographically (X-rays and scans). The mean duration of the procedure (DP), average length of stay (LOS), fusion and complication rates, and time to union were also compared.

RESULTS

At the mean follow-up of 30 months (range, 12-88) for the RTTA group and 59 months (range, 23-94) for the TTA group (p=.001), the AOFAS score increased from 27 to 70.8 points (p<.001) and from 29.8 to 76.2 points (p<.001), respectively; values were similar at the last follow-up (p=.442). Both groups had similar fusion (94%) and complication rates (12%). The DP was 196.9±33.6min (range, 179-213) vs. 130±28.4min (range, 118-141) (p<.001) and the LOS was 3.8 days (range, 2-6) vs. 3.9 days (range, 2-6) (p<.445) for both groups (RTTA vs. TTA).

CONCLUSION

This RTTA technique using a posterior iliac crest allograft for filling bone defects was validated by the quality of the functional outcomes obtained.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; Comparative retrospective study.

Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis with Structural Allograft for Management of Large Osseous Defects of the Hindfoot and Ankle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Large osseous defects of the hindfoot and ankle pose a surgical challenge. Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis utilizing a structural allograft may be required to fill the osseous void, preserve limb length and achieve fusion. Several authors have reported small case series on this topic, however outcomes have varied and no systematic review of this data has been published to date. The primary aim of this study is to report rates of osseous union, limb salvage and complications in patients undergoing TTC arthrodesis with a structural allograft. A total of 11 publications were identified that met the inclusion criteria. One hundred seventy-five patients were included with a weighted mean age of 60.5 (range 50-72) years and follow-up period of 29.7 (range 3-62) months. Femoral head allograft was the most commonly utilized structural graft and a retrograde intramedullary nail was the most common fixation construct. Results demonstrated an overall union rate of 67.4%, limb salvage rate of 92.5% and complication rate of 26.6%. Allograft-related complications were rare with an allograft fracture rate of 0.1% and allograft collapse rate of 1.2%. There was no significant difference in union rate when using a retrograde intramedullary nail versus a plate construct (p = .9148). TTC arthrodesis with use of a structural allograft is a viable treatment option for limb salvage when faced with complex hindfoot and ankle pathology involving large osseous defects. Despite high rates of radiographic nonunion, this approach can provide patients with a stable and functional limb while avoiding amputation.

Two-Staged Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Surgery with Primary Total Ankle Arthroplasty System: A Case Report

CASE

Case of a 2-staged revision surgical technique for the treatment of an aseptic total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) loosening: first surgery: removal of the loosened and painful TAA Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement, with exclusion of infection, and reconstruction of the large bone defect (bone-defect downsizing surgery); proof of successful ankle bone reconstruction by CT-scan imaging; second surgery: implantation of a primary VANTAGE TAA (ankle reconstruction with new primary TAA).

CONCLUSION

The present case shows the management of a failed TAA with bone defect by performing a 2-step surgical approach: removal of loosened TAA with simultaneous bone stock restoration and then implantation of a new primary TAA. This concept is a possible alternative to a post-TAA ankle arthrodesis or to the use of a TAA revision system.

Anterior placement of the talar component in total ankle arthroplasty: A risk factor for talar component subsidence

BACKGROUND

Component subsidence is considered as a cause of revision surgery. The talar component subsidence may be a risk factor for revision surgery; however, there are no reports regarding talar component placement and subsidence amount following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). We therefore investigated the relationship between talar component placement and subsidence amount.

METHODS

Fifty-two ankles from 49 patients (age: 71 years [range 62-83], 13 male/ 36 female), who underwent TAA with mean follow-up of 36 months (range 12-83), were included. The subjects were divided into two groups based on talar component placement: anterior placement (n = 20, group A) and posterior placement (n = 32, group P) using weight-bearing lateral plain radiographs. The amount of the talar component subsidence and clinical outcomes, which included the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) scale, range of the motion (ROM) and the revision rate, were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Talar component subsidence was significantly higher in group A (2.1 ± 2.0 mm) than in group P (0.6 ± 1.4 mm, P = .017). There was no significant difference in the JSSF scale and ROM between group A and group P. The revision rate was 10.0% in group A and 6.3% in group P, albeit not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Greater talar component subsidence was observed when the talar component was placed more anteriorly, suggesting that anterior placement of the talar component may need to be avoided during the surgery in order to minimize the postoperative talar component subsidence.

Damage patterns in polyethylene fixed bearings of retrieved total ankle replacements

INTRODUCTION

Poor long-term outcomes continue to hinder the universal adoption of total ankle replacements (TAR) for end stage arthritis. In the present study, polyethylene inserts of TARs retrieved at revision surgery were analyzed for burnishing, scratching, mechanical damage, pitting, and embedded particles.

METHODS

Fourteen retrieved polyethylene inserts from a fixed bearing total ankle replacement design currently in clinical use were analyzed. Duration of time in vivo was between 11.5 months and 120.1 months. Three investigators independently graded each articular surface in quadrants for five features of damage: burnishing, scratching, mechanical damage, pitting, and embedded particles.

RESULTS

No correlation was found for burnishing between the anterior and posterior aspects (p = 0.47); however, scratching and pitting were significantly higher on the posterior aspect compared to the anterior aspect (p < 0.03). There was a high correlation between burnishing and in vivo duration of the implant (anterior: R = 0.67, p = 0.01, posterior: R = 0.68, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The higher concentration of posterior damage on these polyethylene inserts suggested that prosthesis-related (design) or surgeon-related (technique) factors might restrict the articulation of the implant. The resulting higher stresses in the posterior articular surfaces may have contributed to the failure of retrieved implants Keywords: Retrieval, Polyethylene Damage, Total Ankle Replacement.

Peri-implant fractures around hindfoot fusion nails: A systematic literature review and classification system

BACKGROUND

Tibio-talo calcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis is increasingly performed for hindfoot arthrosis and other indications. Peri-implant fracture around hindfoot fusion nails has been previously reported and can be problematic to treat given multiple surgical considerations including the status of hindfoot arthrodesis at time of fracture. We present a systematic review of the literature regarding peri-implant fractures around hindfoot fusion nails and propose a classification system to help guide treatment based on findings from the current literature as well as the collective experience of the senior authors.

METHODS

A review of the literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify clinical investigations in which peri-implant fractures or other hardware failures were observed as complications following TTC arthrodesis using hindfoot nails. The electronic database of PubMed/Medline/Cochrane Library was explored using specific search terms. Inclusion criteria was any clinical investigation that reported on outcomes after TTC arthrodesis using a hindfoot nail in at least one patient. Cadaveric and non-clinical investigations were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 36 studies were identified which met inclusion criteria and reported clinical outcomes after TTC arthrodesis using a hindfoot fusion nail. Of the 36 studies, there was a total of 13 intraoperative fractures, 43 tibial stress fractures and 24 peri-implant fractures recorded in 12 of the 36 studies.

CONCLUSION

Peri-implant fracture following tibio-talo calcaneal arthrodesis using a hindfoot intramedullary nail is an uncommon but problematic condition to treat. General heterogeneity of patients and indications as well as a lack of descriptive detail in the current literature makes meta-analysis difficult. Given the lack of consensus on treatment, a classification system may be helpful to guide clinical practice.

Salvage Arthrodesis for Failed Total Ankle Replacement

Salvage arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement can be a successful procedure. The decision to perform salvage arthrodesis is based on many factors, but the following are the most important indications: severe loss of bonestock (tibia, talus, or both), inadequate soft tissue coverage, or the inability to eradicate an infection. With few revision implants on the market, salvage arthrodesis is currently the most common treatment for failed replacement and justification for revision ankle replacement is limited when any of these factors are present.

Ankle Arthrodesis With Structural Grafts Can Work for the Salvage of Failed Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Background. Treatment options after failed total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) are limited. This study reports midterm outcomes and radiographic results in a single-surgeon group of patients who have undergone ankle arthrodesis with intramedullary nail fixation and structural allograft augmentation following failed TAA. Methods. A retrospective review on patients who underwent failed TAA revision with structural femoral head allograft and intramedullary tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nail fixation was completed. Foot Function Index (FFI), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) outcome scores, and radiographs were obtained at each visit with 5-year follow-up. Results. Five patients were followed to an average of 5.2 years (range 4.7-5.6). Enrollment FFI was 34.82 (range 8.82-75.88); at midterm follow-up it was 20.42 (range 0-35.38). Enrollment AOFAS scores averaged 66.6 (range 61-77); at midterm follow-up it was 70.33 (range 54-88). Radiographs showed union in 4 of 5 patients at enrollment and 2 of 3 patients at midterm. Conclusions. Utilization of TTC fusion with femoral head allograft is a salvage technique that can produce a functional limb salvage. Our results show continued improvement in patient-reported outcomes, with preservation of limb length and reasonable union rate. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level II: Prospective, comparative trial.

Ankle fusion after failed ankle replacement in rheumatic and non-rheumatic patients

BACKGROUND

With longer follow-up, survival rate of total ankle replacements (TAR) diminishes. It is therefore important to have a reliable fall-back option in case of failed TAR. Revision arthroplasty is often impossible because of loss of bonestock or infection. Conversion to ankle fusion is then indicated. We investigated the clinical, radiographic and patient reported results for fusion after failed TAR in a consecutive group of patients. We concentrated on the influence of inflammatory joint disease (IJD) on union rate.

METHODS

Patient files and radiographic images of 46 consecutive patients (47 ankles) were reviewed. There were 22 patients with IJD. Fixation methods included; anterior plating, blade plate fixation, intramedullary nailing, compression screws and external fixation. Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) were used to determine patient related outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty out of 47 ankles (85%) Fused. Union rate in the non-IJD group (96%) was significantly higher compared to the IJD-group (73%, p=0.04). Revisions and complications were more frequent in the IJD group, but numbers were too small to detect a significant difference. Mean PROM scores were: FAOS-symptoms; 68.5, FAOS-pain; 70.3, FAOS-QoL; 43.7, FAOS-ADL; 68.1 and FAAM-ADL; 52.1, with no significant difference between IJD and non-IJD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

IJD-patients have a higher nonunion rate after ankle fusion for failed TAR. However, patient reported outcome is not significantly different between the two groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective cohort.

Distal tibial distraction osteogenesis-an alternative approach to addressing limb length discrepancy with concurrent hindfoot and ankle reconstruction

Background

Limb length discrepancy (LLD) in the setting of concurrent hindfoot and ankle deformity poses an added level of complexity to the reconstructive surgeon. Regardless of etiology, a clinically significant LLD poses additional challenges without a forthright and validated solution. The purpose of the current study is to determine whether reconstructive hindfoot and ankle surgery with concurrent lengthening through a distal tibial corticotomy is comparable to other treatment alternatives in the literature.

Patients and methods

A retrospective review of hindfoot and ankle deformity correction utilizing Ilizarov circular external fixation with concurrent distal tibial distraction osteogenesis from July 2009 to September 2014 was conducted.

Results

This study included 19 patients with a mean age of 47.47 ± 13.36 years with a mean follow up of 576.13 ± 341.89 days. The mean preoperative LLD was 2.70 ± 1.22 cm and the mean operatively induced LLD was 2.53 ± 0.59 cm. The mean latency period was 9.33 ± 3.47 days and distraction rate was 0.55 ± 0.16 mm/day. The mean distraction length was 2.14 ± 0.83 cm and mean duration of external fixation was 146.42 ± 58.69 days. The time to union of all hindfoot and ankle fusions was 121.00 ± 25.66 days with an overall fusion rate of 85.71%.

Conclusions

The successful treatment of hindfoot and ankle deformity correction in the setting of LLD using the technique of a distal tibial corticotomy and distraction osteogenesis is reported and illustrates an additional treatment technique with comparable measured outcomes to those previously described. We urge that each patient presentation be evaluated with consideration of all described approaches and associated literature to determine the current best reconstructive approach as future studies may validate or replace the accepted options at present.

Clinical applications of allografts in foot and ankle surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to systematically analyse current literature on the use of allografts in the surgical treatment of foot and ankle disorders in adult patients. Based on this study, we propose evidence-based recommendations.

METHODS

The database for PubMed was searched for all published articles. No timeframe restrictions were applied. Clinical studies eligible for inclusion met the following criteria: performed on patients over 18 years old; subject to surgical treatment of foot and ankle disorders; with report on the outcome of the use of allografts; with a report and assessment of pain and function, or equivalent; minimum follow-up of 1 year was required. Two reviewers independently screened and selected studies for full-text analysis from title and abstract. 107 studies were included from 1113 records. Studies were grouped according to surgical indications into ten categories: musculoskeletal tumours (n = 16), chronic ankle instability (n = 15), ankle arthritis (n = 14), osteochondral lesions of the talus (n = 12), Achilles tendon defects (n = 11), other tendon defects (n = 9), fusions (n = 9), fractures (n = 8), hallux rigidus (n = 3) and other indications (n = 10).

RESULTS

Most studies displayed evidence level of IV (n = 57) and V (n = 39). There was one level I, one level II and nine level III studies. Most studies reported allografting as a good option (n = 99; 92.5%). Overall complication rate was 17% (n = 202).

CONCLUSIONS

Fair evidence (Grade B) was found in favour of the use of allografts in lateral ankle ligament reconstruction or treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fracture. Fair evidence (Grade B) was found against the use of allogeneic MSCs in tibiotalar fusions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Total Ankle Replacement Conversion to Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With Bulk Femoral Head Allograft and Pseudoelastic Intramedullary Nail Providing Sustained Joint Compression

Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis is commonly performed to salvage a failed total ankle replacement. These salvage procedures are complicated by significant bone loss from the ankle replacement and are associated with low patient satisfaction. Here, we describe 2 cases of patients who presented with a failed total ankle replacement and underwent arthrodesis using a bulk femoral head allograft and a novel pseudoelastic intramedullary nail. The intramedullary nail contains an internal pseudoelastic element that adapts to bone resorption and settling allowing for compression to be maintained at the arthrodesis sites throughout healing. In the first case, a 65-year-old woman with a failed total ankle replacement underwent TTC arthrodesis. The second case involved an obese 53-year-old woman who had previously undergone 2 total ankle replacement procedures that resulted in unsuccessful outcomes. In both cases, union was demonstrated on computed tomographic scan by 6 months. At 2 years postsurgery, both patients were satisfied with the procedure. These cases provide preliminary evidence that tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a pseudoelastic IM nail and structural allograft is an appropriate treatment for failed total ankle replacements.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV, therapeutic, case series.

Sagittal Ankle and Midfoot Range of Motion Before and After Revision Total Ankle Replacement: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis

The most common reason for a revision total ankle replacement procedure is a painful, stiff ankle even after the initial surgery. Limited and conflicting data are available regarding the change in sagittal foot and ankle range of motion after revision total ankle replacement surgery. We sought to determine whether revision total ankle replacements would reduce compensatory midfoot range of motion. In determining this, a novel radiographic measurement system with stable osseous landmarks is used. A retrospective medical record review of patients who had undergone revision total ankle replacement from January 2009 to June 2016 was performed. Thirty-three patients (33 ankles) underwent revision total ankle replacement surgery and met the inclusion criteria with a mean follow-up period of 28.39 ± 14.68 (range 2 to 59) months. Investigation of preoperative and postoperative weightbearing lateral radiographic images was performed to determine the global foot and ankle, isolated ankle, and isolated midfoot sagittal ranges of motion. Statistical analysis revealed a significant increase in ankle range of motion (p = .046) and a significant decrease in midfoot range of motion (p < .001) from preoperatively to postoperatively. The change in global foot and ankle range of motion was not significant (p = .53). For this patient population, the increased ankle range of motion effectively resulted in less compensatory midfoot range of motion.

Rate of Subtalar Joint Arthrodesis After Retrograde Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With Intramedullary Nail Fixation: Evaluation of the RAIN Database

BACKGROUND

Hindfoot arthritis or significant deformity involving the ankle and subtalar joint (STJ) is a disabling condition with few salvage options. Many surgeons note a decreased STJ fusion rate compared with ankle union when a retrograde nail construct is used. The purpose of this study was to report the STJ fusion rate of tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with retrograde nail.

METHODS

A chart and radiographic review was performed. TTC fusions performed in patients with osteoarthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, or deformity correction with retrograde nail fixation were included. Exclusion criteria included neuropathy, Charcot arthropathy, and failed total ankle replacement.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 66 retrograde TTC fusions (in 63 patients) met inclusion criteria. The average age was 57.0 years. There were 29 female and 34 male patients. Radiographic fusion of the ankle and STJ was demonstrated in 68.2% of the patients. There were 11 cases (16.7%) of ankle arthrodesis with STJ nonunion, 6 cases (9.1%) of STJ fusion but ankle nonunion, and 4 cases (6.1%) of stable radiographic nonunion of both joints. The mean time to subtalar fusion was 112.1 days. One patient required revision surgery and conversion to below-knee amputation. One patient required a CROW walker for assistance with gait.

CONCLUSION

A 22.8% radiographic nonunion rate of the STJ was noted in retrograde TTC fusion. Despite this, patients were stable and pain free.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level IV: Retrospective Case series.

Staged Treatment of Infected Tibiotalar Fusion Using a Combination Antibiotic Spacer and Antibiotic-Coated Intramedullary Nail

Pilon fractures are notoriously difficult injuries to treat. The current published data on salvage procedures after failed pilon fractures includes both total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and tibiotalar fusion, each with its own specific indications. However, no acceptable treatment algorithm addressing the complications of these limb salvage procedures is available. We present the case of a 23-year-old patient, who sustained a complex pilon fracture after a motor vehicle accident. The patient was referred to our institution after an initial fixation attempt, followed by subsequent failed TAA, which was complicated by an infected fusion attempt. We describe a staged treatment approach to clearing the infection and obtaining the final fusion goals.

Poor outcomes of fusion with Trabecular Metal implants after failed total ankle replacement: Early results in 11 patients

INTRODUCTION

One of the reasons for revision of total ankle replacement (TAR) implants is loosening due to subchondral cysts. Reconstruction and fusion of the ankle is often the first choice for revision procedures due to the large bone defects, which are typically filled with autograft and/or allograft. Filling the defect with a trabecular metal tantalum implant is a potential alternative given the biomechanical properties of this component.

HYPOTHESIS

Using tantalum as a spacer provides primary stability and contributes to fusion of the ankle joint after removal of failed TAR implants.

METHODS

Eleven patients underwent arthrodesis an average of 6.9 years after TAR. The mean height of the bone defect was 32mm. It was filled with a specially designed quadrangular implant (Trabecular Metal™, Zimmer/Biomet) combined with an iliac crest graft. Ten patients underwent tibio-talo-calcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis fixed with an angled retrograde nail and one patient underwent talocrural arthrodesis fixed with two plates (anterolateral and anteromedial). The clinical, functional (AOFAS and SF36 scores) and radiological (plain X-rays and CT scan) outcomes were determined.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 19.3 months, the mean total AOFAS score was 56 (21-78) and the mean SF36 score was 60.5 (19-84). One patient was lost to follow-up and four patients still had pain. The tantalum implant was integrated in six patients. Five patients achieved fusion of the subtalar joint and 8 achieved fusion of the talocrural joint. Three patients required surgical revision.

DISCUSSION

Our hypothesis was not confirmed. The clinical outcomes after more than 1 year of follow-up are disappointing, as was the large number of nonunion cases and the lack of tantalum integration. These technical failures can be explained by insufficient construct stability and/or insufficient implant porosity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (retrospective cohort study).

Salvage arthrodesis of a failed total ankle replacement using a custom 3D-printed cage implant: A case report and review of the literature

We present a case report of a 66-year-old female who underwent salvage arthrodesis after a failed Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement secondary to aseptic loosening and talar subsidence. Secondary to the loss of talar integrity the decision was made to proceed with revisional ankle arthrodesis. To maintain limb length the primary surgeon (EH) elected to use a custom cage implant in combination with an intramedullary nail construct in a single stage approach. The custom cage was augmented with autograft & allograft cancellous bone in addition to allograft recombinant human bone morphogenic protein, and allograft adult mesenchymal stem cells. The incision sites healed post-operatively without incident and at post-op week 16 the patient progressed to full unrestricted weight bearing in normal shoe wear with a gauntlet ankle brace. Although an isolated report, this case shows promise for further development of the technique. We believe this revisional arthrodesis technique warrants further research and consideration as a potential addition to the failed total ankle arthroplasty treatment algorithm.

Comparison of Posterior Approach With Intramedullary Nailing Versus Lateral Transfibular Approach With Fixed-Angle Plating for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

A variety of operative approaches and fixation techniques have been described for tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis. The intramedullary (IM) nail and lateral, fixed-angle plating are commonly used because of ease of use and favorable biomechanical properties. A lateral, transfibular (LTF) approach allows for direct access to the tibiotalar and subtalar joints, but the posterior, Achilles tendon-splitting (PATS) approach offers a robust soft tissue envelope. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of TTC arthrodesis with either a PATS approach with IM nailing or LTF approach with fixed-angle plating.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent simultaneous TTC arthrodesis with minimum 1 year clinical and radiographic follow up. Patients were excluded if they underwent TTC arthrodesis through an approach other than PATS or LTF, and received fixation without an IM nail or fixed-angle plate. Primary outcomes examined were union rate, revisions, and complications. Thirty-eight patients underwent TTC arthrodesis with a PATS approach and IM nailing, and 28 with a LTF approach and lateral plating.

RESULTS

The overall union rate was 71%; 76% (29 of 38 patients) for the PATS/IM nail group, and 64% (18 of 28) for LTF/plating group ( P = .41). Symptomatic nonunion requiring revision arthrodesis occurred in 16% (6 of 38) of the PATS/IM nail group versus 7% (2 of 28) in the LTF/lateral plating group ( P = .45). There were no significant differences in individual tibiotalar or subtalar union rates, superficial wound problems, infection, symptomatic hardware, stress fractures, or nerve irritations.

CONCLUSION

Union, revision, and complication rates were similar for TTC arthrodesis performed with a PATS approach and IM nail compared with an LTF approach and fixed-angle plate in a complex patient population. Both techniques were adequate, especially when prior incisions, preexisting hardware, or deformity preclude options.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

The AES total ankle arthroplasty analysis of failures and survivorship at ten years

BACKGROUND

AES mobile-bearing total ankle replacement was developed from the Buechel Pappas model. It was withdrawn in 2009, after identification of a higher than expected complication rate. The purpose of the current study was to analyse clinical outcomes, failures and survival of the initial series of 50 AES published in 2009.

METHODS

In this single-centre continuous prospective study (2003-2006), 50 AES prostheses were included. Pre-operative osteoarthritis was mainly post-traumatic (50%) and secondary to instability (36%). All patients were assessed with clinical and radiographic follow-up at six months, one year, two years and every two to three years thereafter. A CT-scan was systematically performed before procedure, and at two years, five years and ten years. At last follow-up, all patients with TAR had a functional (SF 36, AOFAS) and clinical assessment. All complications or surgical events were analysed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was ten ± two years (range, 9-13). The mean AOFAS score was 75 points (range, 26-100). The mean SF 36 score was 69 points (range, 35-97). There was a significant deterioration in AOFAS score at five years and at last follow-up (p < 0.05). Fifteen TARs underwent reoperation for cyst curettage-graft because of development of periprosthetic lesions. Six of them ended up with prosthesis removal-arthrodesis. At the last follow-up, 14 TARs were removed for arthrodesis. Of the 30 prostheses seen at last follow-up, four are awaiting prosthesis removal-arthrodesis and one for cyst curettage-graft. The ten year survivorships free of any prosthesis removal or arthrodesis and free of any reoperation were 68% (95% CI, 55-85) and 57% (95% CI, 44-74), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggested a high rate of reoperation. Overall ten year survival was lower than with other designs, particularly due to cyst lesions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prospective case series.

Clinical assessment of 115 cases of hindfoot fusion with two different types of graft: Allograft+DBM+bone marrow aspirate versus autograft+DBM

INTRODUCTION

Nonunion is a common complication (15%) of hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis. Autograft can improve the fusion rate because of its osteoconductive, osteoinductive and osteogenic properties. However, autograft harvesting is a source of morbidity. One alternative is to combine allograft with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and iliac bone marrow aspirate (BMA). This combination graft has similar biological properties to healthy bone. When used alone, allograft has osteoconductive and sometimes structural properties. DBM provides osteoinduction and improves the osteconductivity. BMA adds cells and thereby osteogenic potential.

HYPOTHESIS

Given its intrinsic properties, allograft-DBM-BMA is as effective as autograft-DBM treatment while simplifying the clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred and fifteen cases of ankle and hindfoot arthrodesis were studied in 82 patients divided in two groups: autograft-DBM vs allograft-DBM-BMA. Treatment effectiveness was assessed using clinical (time to fusion, fusion rate) and radiological (trabecular bone bridge, disappearance of joint space) criteria. A CT scan was done in 60% of cases when fusion could not be confirmed using the clinical and radiological criteria.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of fusion rate, time to fusion, number of heterotopic ossifications, revision rate and quantity of DBM used. The nonunion rate was 18% in the autograft group and 13% in the allograft group. The infection rate was 11% in the autograft and 4% in the allograft group.

DISCUSSION

Allograft-DBM-BMA is an alternative to autograft-DBM that provides similar effectiveness without increasing the number of nonunion or complications. Osteonecrosis and surgical revision are risk factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III retrospective study.

Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with reverse PHILOS plate and medial cannulated screws with lateral approach

BACKGROUND

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis is most common and effective surgical treatment for severe hindfoot pathology, but the fusion rate is often lower than the ordinary tibiotalar arthrodesis because of the more serious joint disease associated with obvious deformity and osteoporosis. Recent literature describe tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with reverse PHILOS plate with good clinical outcome result, though some patients non-union, due to eccentric force of the plate may be hidden. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome of the lateral approach for tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with reverse PHILOS Plate and medial cannulated screw.

METHODS

Between Jun, 2013 to April, 2015 12 patient with hindfoot pathology had TTC arthrodesis with a reverse PHILOS plate with medial cannulated screw through a lateral approach with resection of the distal fibula and bone graft. Perioperatively observe for wound and neurovascular status. Patients were follow-up from post-operative 1, 3, 6 and12 months, to observation of wound healing, ankle pain, subtalar Joint Fusion, internal fixation and ankle function. Ankle function were scored according to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale system.

RESULTS

Twelve ankle fusion all patient follow-up, with mean time to surgery 18.6 months (12-36 month). No cases infection and issue necrosis; one patient complaint of lateral foot numbness we observe and follow-up was spontaneously recovery after 3 months. After 3 months of operation, no obvious pain of ankle joint and internal fixations loose were found. Almost fusion and good axial alignment of TTC joint also were found by X-ray and CT examination. After final fellow-up of each case, no case complain of pain of ankle joint, good fusion and axial alignment of TTC joint were also all found through Terminology. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle society (AOFAS) score average was 77.5.

CONCLUSION

TTC arthrodesis with reverse PHILOS Plate and medial cannulated screw have advantages of clear incision, effective bone orthopaedic and graft fully secure, stable internal fixation, high fusion rate and less complications, can effectively correct deformities, alleviate hindfoot pain and improve function, and is an effective method of treatment of after severe hindfoot disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with reference number: ID: NCT02977910 . Registered 26 Nov 2016, retrospectively registered.

Hindfoot Arthrodesis with the Blade Plate: Increased Risk of Complications and Nonunion in a Complex Patient Population

BACKGROUND

Previous hindfoot surgeries present a unique challenge to hindfoot arthrodesis, as the patients may have multiple incisions around the hindfoot. In high-risk patients with compromised soft tissues, a posterior approach can provide an alternative for a fresh soft tissue plane for the surgery. The use of a blade plate construct is widely accepted; however, there are limited data supporting the use of a posterior approach.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked (1) what proportion of patients treated with this technique achieved osseous union; (2) what complications were observed; (3) were any patient-demographic or health-related factors associated with the likelihood that a patient would have a complication develop?

METHODS

Between December 2001 and July 2014, 42 patients received a posterior blade plate. During the period in question, indications for hindfoot arthrodesis using posterior blade fixation were subtalar osteoarthritis below an ankle fusion, malunion or nonunion, failed tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis attributable to nonunion of the tibiotalar and/or subtalar joint; or tibiotalar and subtalar osteoarthritis in patients with impaired bone or soft tissue quality (particularly if the soft tissue problem was anterior). During that period, all patients who met those indications were treated with a posterior blade plate. Forty (95%) were included in this study, and two were lost to followup before the 1-year minimum required by the study. Demographics (age, gender, BMI, smoking status, and comorbidities) and surgical data (indication, previous treatment, and additional procedures) were analyzed. Of the 40 patients included, 27 (68%) were male and 13 (33%) were female, with a median of two previous hindfoot or ankle surgeries (range, 0-9 surgeries). The mean age of the patients was 56 ± 13 years. Followup averaged 47 ± 28 months (range, 14-137 months). Twenty-eight of 40 (70%) patients had a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis as a primary (n = 6), primary staged (n = 10), revision (n = 9), or revision staged (n = 3) procedure. Eleven of 40 patients (28%) underwent ankle arthrodesis (primary n = 7, revision n = 4). One of the 40 patients (3%) underwent tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for a failed total ankle arthroplasty. Weightbearing radiographs were used to assess fusion. Osseous fusion was defined as visible trabecular bridging on the lateral and AP ankle views within 6 postoperative months. Delayed union was defined as osseous fusion occurring between 6 and 12 months. Nonunion was defined as no visible trabecular bridging at the latest followup (longer than 12 months). Clinic and surgery notes were reviewed for complications. Univariate analysis was performed to compare patient groups: patients with solid union versus nonunion, and patients with versus without complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of 40 (73%) patients had osseous fusion within 6 postoperative months. Four of 40 (10%) patients had a delayed union between 6 and 12 months, and seven of the 40 (18%) patients had nonunions, which occurred in the ankle (n = 3), subtalar (n = 3), or both (n = 1) joints. There were 26 complications observed: 18 (69%) were considered major and eight (31%) were minor. With the numbers available, we did not identify any demographic or surgical factors associated with complications, delayed union, or nonunion.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of patients treated with a posterior blade plate hindfoot fusion who had delayed union or nonunion is greater than that reported for patients in other series who underwent primary hindfoot arthrodesis with other approaches, and the proportion of patients who had complications develop is high. Further studies are needed to address alternative approaches to achieve hindfoot fusion in patients with complex hindfoot problems.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a triple-bend intramedullary nail (A3)-2-year follow-up in 60 patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical aspects including 2-year follow-up of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) with a triple-bend retrograde intramedullary nail (A3, Stryker, Airview Boulevard, MN, USA).

METHODS

All patients with TTCA with A3 between October 18, 2011 and April 29, 2013 were included. Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Anklenkle (VAS FA), indications for surgery, details of surgery, radiographic measurements, and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients were included. The mean VAS FA was 29.6. Most common indications were arthrosis (n=43; 65%) and deformity (n=36; 55%). The accuracy of correction and implant position was 9.4 (maximum 10) on average. Infection rate was 3% (n=2). Sixty (91%) patients completed follow-up: VAS FA 59.9, fusion rate 100%, high accuracy of correction and implant position.

CONCLUSIONS

TTCA with the A3 implant system showed accurate correction and implant position. Two-year follow-up in 60 patients (91%) showed good clinical outcome scores and 100% fusion rate.

Outcome After Salvage Arthrodesis for Failed Total Ankle Replacement

BACKGROUND

In cases with total ankle replacement (TAR) failure, a decision between revision TAR and salvage arthrodesis (SA) must be made. In a previous study, we analyzed revision TAR and found low functional outcome and satisfaction. The aims of the current study were to analyze SA concerning failure rate and patient-related outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

Until September 2014, a total of 1110 primary TARs were recorded in the Swedish Ankle Registry. Of the 188 failures, 118 were revised with SA (and 70 with revision TAR). Patient- and implant-specific data for SA cases were analyzed as well as arthrodesis techniques. Failure of SA was defined as repeat arthrodesis or amputation. Generic and region-specific PROMs of 68 patients alive with a solid unilateral SA performed more than 1 year before were analyzed.

RESULTS

The first-attempt solid arthrodesis rate of SA was 90%. Overall, 25 of 53 (47%) patients were very satisfied or satisfied. Mean Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) was 22 (95% confidence interval 20-24), Euro Qol-5 Dimensions 0.57 (0.49-0.65), Euro Qol-Visual Analogue Scale 59 (53-64), Short Form-36 physical 34 (31-37) and mental 50 (46-54). The scores and satisfaction were similar to those after revision TAR but the reoperation rate was significantly lower in SA (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Salvage arthrodesis after failed TAR had a solid arthrodesis rate of 90% at first attempt, but similar to revision TAR, less than 50% of the patients were satisfied and the functional scores were low. Until studies show true benefit of revision TAR over SA, we favor SA for failed TAR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Intermediate-term Results of Mobile-bearing Total Ankle Replacement

BACKGROUND

The literature analyzing total ankle replacement (TAR) results should be critically interpreted because studies made by the design surgeons are potentially subject to bias. European nondesigner surgeon studies reviewing the HINTEGRA TAR system are scarce in the literature. The present study is a European nondesigner surgeon study reviewing a consecutive series of 50 HINTEGRA TAR systems with a minimum follow-up of 2 years, focusing on clinical and radiographic outcomes.

METHODS

Fifty primary TAR procedures were performed between February 2008 and January 2012 by a single surgeon. Every patient underwent a standardized clinical and radiographic follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively and annually thereafter. The mean time to final follow-up was 45 months.

RESULTS

The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score significantly increased from 43.5 preoperatively to 83.8 postoperatively. Clinical range of motion of the ankle also improved from 23.3 degrees preoperatively to 28.3 degrees postoperatively. In 70% of the TAR procedures, the talar component was positioned anteriorly with respect to the tibial axis. Radiological evidence of osteolysis was identified in 24 ankles. The failure rate in the present series was 10%, which was defined as having major revision surgery within 4 years.

CONCLUSION

The survival of the first 50 HINTEGRA TAR systems in this series was satisfactory from clinical and radiological points of view. However, the incidence of asymptomatic periprosthetic osteolytic lesions was quite high (24 ankles).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Inferior results of salvage arthrodesis after failed ankle replacement compared to primary arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Up to now, there has been no evidence that salvage arthrodesis would perform inferior when compared with primary ankle arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to compare their clinical and radiographic results.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed using 2 validated scores and assessment of radiographic union by comparing 23 patients who underwent salvage ankle arthrodesis (group SA = salvage arthrodesis) after failed total ankle replacement with 23 matched patients who received primary ankle arthrodesis (group PA = primary arthrodesis). The mean follow-up period was 38 (range 16-92) months in group SA and 56 (23-94) months in group PA.

RESULTS

Complete union was achieved in 17 patients (74%) after a mean time of 50 (13- 114) weeks in group SA and in 16 patients (70%) after a mean time of 23 (10-115) weeks in group PA. The SF-36 score averaged 48 points (7-80) in SA and 66 points (14-94; P = .006) in group PA. In group SA the mean FFI was 57% (22-82) for pain and 71% (44-98) for function. In group PA significantly better results for pain with 34% (0-88; P = .002) and function with 48% (1-92; P = .002) were found.

CONCLUSION

Salvage arthrodesis led to impaired life quality and reduced function combined with significantly higher pain when compared with primary ankle arthrodesis. These findings can be used to counsel our patients preoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective case series.