Characterization of the adenosine pharmacology of ticagrelor reveals therapeutically relevant inhibition of equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1

Aspirin loading and coronary no-reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The association of aspirin loading with the risk of coronary no-reflow (CNR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been investigated. We assessed the association of aspirin loading before PCI with CNR in patients with AMI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 3100 patients with AMI undergoing PCI. Of them, 2812 patients received aspirin loading (a single oral [or chewed] or intravenous dose of 150-300 mg) and 288 patients did not receive aspirin loading before PCI. The primary endpoint was CNR, defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction blood flow grade of <3 after the PCI.

RESULTS

CNR occurred in 130 patients: 127 patients in the group with aspirin loading and 3 patients in the group without aspirin loading before PCI (4.5% vs. 1.0%; odds ratio [OR] = 4.50, 95% confidence interval, [1.42-14.21], p = 0.005). After adjustment, the association between aspirin loading and CNR was significant (adjusted OR = 4.49 [1.56-12.92]; p < 0.001). There was no aspirin loading-by-P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel) interaction (pint = 0.465) or aspirin loading-by-chronic aspirin therapy on admission (pint = 0.977) interaction with respect to the occurrence of CNR after PCI. Chronic low-dose aspirin therapy on admission was not independently associated with higher risk of CNR after PCI (adjusted OR = 1.06 [0.65-1.72]; p = 0.824).

CONCLUSION

In patients with AMI undergoing PCI, aspirin loading before the PCI procedure at the guideline-recommended doses was associated with higher odds of developing CNR. However, due to the limited number of events, the findings should be considered as hypothesis generating.

Pharmacogenetic considerations in therapy with novel antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents

Antiplatelets and anticoagulants are extensively used in cardiovascular medicine for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis in the venous and arterial circulations. Wide inter-individual variability has been observed in response to antiplatelets and anticoagulants, which triggered researchers to investigate the genetic basis of this variability. Data from extensive pharmacogenetic studies pointed to strong evidence of association between polymorphisms in candidate genes and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic action and clinical response of the antiplatelets clopidogrel and the anticoagulant warfarin. In this review, we conducted an extensive search on Medline for the time period of 2009-2023. We also searched the PharmGKB website for levels of evidence of variant-drug combinations and for drug labels and clinical guidelines. We focus on the pharmacogenetics of novel antiplatelets and anticoagulants while excluding acetylsalicylic acid, warfarin and heparins, and discuss the current knowledge with emphasis on the level of evidence.

Ticagrelor, but Not Clopidogrel, Attenuates Hepatic Steatosis in a Model of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that platelets are associated with inflammation and steatosis and may play an important role in liver health. Therefore, we evaluated whether antiplatelet agents can improve metabolic disorder-related fatty liver disease (MASLD).

METHODS

The mice used in the study were fed a high-fat-diet (HFD) and were stratified through liver biopsy at 18 weeks. A total of 22 mice with NAFLD activity scores (NAS) ≥ 4 were randomly divided into three groups (HFD-only, clopidogrel (CLO; 35 mg/kg/day), ticagrelor (TIC; 40 mg/kg/day) group). And then, they were fed a feed mixed with the respective drug for 15 weeks. Blood and tissue samples were collected and used in the study.

RESULTS

The TIC group showed a significantly lower degree of NAS and steatosis than the HFD group (p = 0.0047), but no effect on the CLO group was observed. Hepatic lipogenesis markers' (SREBP1c, FAS, SCD1, and DGAT2) expression and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress markers (CHOP, Xbp1, and GRP78) only reduced significantly in the TIC treatment group. Inflammation genes (MCP1 and TNF-α) also decreased significantly in the TIC group, but not in the CLO group. Nile red staining intensity and hepatic lipogenesis markers were reduced significantly in HepG2 cells following TIC treatment.

CONCLUSION

Ticagrelor attenuated NAS and hepatic steatosis in a MASLD mice model by attenuating lipogenesis and inflammation, but not in the CLO group.

The role of platelet P2Y12 receptors in inflammation

Inflammation is a complex pathophysiological process underlying many clinical conditions. Platelets contribute to the thrombo-inflammatory response. Platelet P2Y12 receptors amplify platelet activation, potentiating platelet aggregation, degranulation and shape change. The contents of platelet alpha granules, in particular, act directly on leucocytes, including mediating platelet-leucocyte aggregation and activation via platelet P-selectin. Much evidence for the role of platelet P2Y12 receptors in inflammation comes from studies using antagonists of these receptors, such as the thienopyridines clopidogrel and prasugrel, and the cyclopentyltriazolopyrimidine ticagrelor, in animal and human experimental models. These suggest that antagonism of P2Y12 receptors decreases markers of inflammation with some evidence that this reduces incidence of adverse clinical sequelae during inflammatory conditions. Interpretation is complicated by pleiotropic effects such as those of the thienopyridines on circulating leucocyte numbers and of ticagrelor on adenosine reuptake. The available evidence suggests that P2Y12 receptors are prominent mediators of inflammation and P2Y12 receptor antagonism as a potentially powerful strategy in a broad range of inflammatory conditions. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on Platelet purinergic receptor and non-thrombotic disease. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v181.4/issuetoc.

Progress in the clinical effects and adverse reactions of ticagrelor

BACKGROUND

Ticagrelor is a novel receptor antagonist that selectively binds to the P2Y12 receptor, thereby inhibiting adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-mediated platelet aggregation. Compared to clopidogrel, ticagrelor has the advantages of a fast onset, potent effects, and a reversible platelet inhibition function, which make this drug clinically suitable for treating acute coronary syndrome (ACS), especially acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

OBJECTIVE

This review was performed to determine the basic characteristics, clinical effects, and adverse reactions of ticagrelor.

METHODS

Relevant trials and reports were obtained from the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases.

RESULTS

Ticagrelor is rapidly absorbed by the body after oral administration, exhibits inherent activity without requiring metabolic activation, and binds reversibly to the P2Y12 receptor. Ticagrelor has been recommended in ACS treatment guidelines worldwide due to its advantageous pharmacological properties and significant clinical benefits. Ticagrelor inhibits platelet aggregation, inhibits inflammatory response, enhances adenosine function, and has cardioprotective effects. However, ticagrelor also causes adverse reactions such as bleeding tendency, dyspnea, ventricular pause, gout, kidney damage, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in clinical treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to risk assessments when using ticagrelor.

CONCLUSION

Ticagrelor is a promising drug for the effective treatment of ACS. When using ticagrelor, individualized treatment should be provided based on the specific conditions of the patients to avoid serious adverse events.

Off-Target Effects of P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitors: Focus on Early Myocardial Fibrosis Modulation

Several studies have demonstrated that, beyond their antithrombotic effects, P2Y12 receptor inhibitors may provide additional off-target effects through different mechanisms. These effects range from the preservation of endothelial barrier function to the modulation of inflammation or stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques, with an impact on different cell types, including endothelial and immune cells. Many P2Y12 inhibitors have been developed, from ticlopidine, the first thienopyridine, to the more potent non-thienopyridine derivatives such as ticagrelor which may promote cardioprotective effects following myocardial infarction (MI) by inhibiting adenosine reuptake through sodium-independent equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1). Adenosine may affect different molecular pathways involved in cardiac fibrosis, such as the Wnt (wingless-type)/beta (β)-catenin signaling. An early pro-fibrotic response of the epicardium and activation of cardiac fibroblasts with the involvement of Wnt1 (wingless-type family member 1)/β-catenin, are critically required for preserving cardiac function after acute ischemic cardiac injury. This review discusses molecular signaling pathways involved in cardiac fibrosis post MI, focusing on the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, and the off-target effect of P2Y12 receptor inhibition. A potential role of ticagrelor was speculated in the early modulation of cardiac fibrosis, thanks to its off-target effect.

Advances and Perspectives in methods for identifying high platelet reactivity

Antiplatelet therapy is the foundational treatment for the prevention and treatment of coronary and cerebrovascular ischemic events in patients with coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, and transient ischemic attack (TIA). However, with more and more studies reporting an increased risk of thrombosis in some patients due to poor response to therapeutic agents, the selection of appropriate P2Y12 inhibitors has become a major challenge that needs to be addressed urgently. Currently, commonly used oral P2Y12 inhibitors include clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and prasugrel. Assessing patients' risk factors before the development of treatment regimens by effectively predicting the risk of high platelet reactivity with specific P2Y12 inhibitors in advance to avert the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) is the key point to the problem. Up to now, methods available for predicting platelet reactivity include genetic testing, platelet function testing, and risk scores. This review provides a summarization of the existent available identification methods and analyzes the advantages and drawbacks of different methods in specific clinical settings, intending to guide the rational clinical application of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors.

Dyspnea-Related Ticagrelor Discontinuation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

Nearly 20% of patients on ticagrelor experience dyspnea, which may lead to treatment discontinuation in up to one-third of cases.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to evaluate the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of dyspnea-related ticagrelor discontinuation after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

In the TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention) trial, after 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, patients were maintained on ticagrelor and randomized to aspirin or placebo for 1 year. The occurrence of dyspnea associated with ticagrelor discontinuation was evaluated among all patients enrolled in the trial. A landmark analysis was performed at 3 months after PCI, that is, the time of randomization. Predictors of dyspnea-related ticagrelor discontinuation were obtained from multivariable Cox regression with stepwise selection of candidate variables.

RESULTS

The incidence of dyspnea-related ticagrelor discontinuation was 6.4% and 9.1% at 3 and 15 months after PCI, respectively. Independent predictors included Asian race (lower risk), smoking, prior PCI, hypercholesterolemia, prior coronary artery bypass, peripheral artery disease, obesity, and older age. Among 179 patients who discontinued ticagrelor because of dyspnea after randomization, ticagrelor monotherapy was not associated with a higher risk of subsequent ischemic events (composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin (5.0% vs 7.1%; P = 0.566).

CONCLUSIONS

In the TWILIGHT trial, dyspnea-related ticagrelor discontinuation occurred in almost 1 in 10 patients and tended to occur earlier rather than late after PCI. Several demographic and clinical conditions predicted its occurrence, and their assessment may help identify subjects at risk for therapy nonadherence.

In vivo phenotypic validation of adenosine receptor-dependent activity of non-adenosine drugs

Some non-adenosinergic drugs are reported to also act through adenosine receptors (ARs). We used mouse hypothermia, which can be induced by agonism at any of the four ARs, as an in vivo screen for adenosinergic effects. An AR contribution was identified when a drug caused hypothermia in wild type mice that was diminished in mice lacking all four ARs (quadruple knockout, QKO). Alternatively, an adenosinergic effect was identified if a drug potentiated adenosine-induced hypothermia. Four drugs (dipyridamole, nimodipine, cilostazol, cyclosporin A) increased the hypothermia caused by adenosine. Dipyridamole and nimodipine probably achieved this by inhibition of adenosine clearance via ENT1. Two drugs (cannabidiol, canrenoate) did not cause hypothermia in wild type mice. Four other drugs (nifedipine, ranolazine, ketamine, ethanol) caused hypothermia, but the hypothermia was unchanged in QKO mice indicating non-adenosinergic mechanisms. Zinc chloride caused hypothermia and hypoactivity; the hypoactivity was blunted in the QKO mice. Interestingly, the antidepressant amitriptyline caused hypothermia in wild type mice that was amplified in the QKO mice. Thus, we have identified adenosine-related effects for some drugs, while other candidates do not affect adenosine signaling by this in vivo assay. The adenosine-modulating drugs could be considered for repurposing based on predicted effects on AR activation.

The effect of ticagrelor on coronary microvascular function after PCI in patients with ACS compared to clopidogrel: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The function of coronary microcirculation is an important factor in predicting the prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who receive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) therapy. Ticagrelor, a type of oral P2Y12 inhibitor, is widely prescribed to ACS patients and can improve prognosis compared to clopidogrel. However, the efficacy of ticagrelor on coronary microcirculation, compared to clopidogrel, remains unclear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of ticagrelor on coronary microcirculation.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were comprehensively searched to identify studies until November 2022. Data was pooled using the fixed effects model or random effects model based on the level of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses were performed to measure the effects of potential confounders.

RESULTS

After screening, 16 trials with a total of 3676 participants were ultimately included in the analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that compared to clopidogrel, patients receiving ticagrelor exhibited a more significant reduction in the IMR (WMD: -6.23, 95% CI: -8.41 to -4.04), a reduction in the cTFC (WMD: -1.88; 95% CI: -3.32 to -0.45), and greater increases in CFR (WMD: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.57), MBG (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.48), and TIMI (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.06).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that, compared to clopidogrel, ticagrelor has a significant effect in reducing coronary microcirculatory resistance, enhancing coronary blood flow reserve, and improving myocardial perfusion.

Recombinant Apyrase (AZD3366) Against Myocardial Reperfusion Injury

PURPOSE

Recombinant apyrase (AZD3366) increases adenosine production and ticagrelor inhibits adenosine reuptake. We investigated whether intravenous AZD3366 before reperfusion reduces myocardial infarct size (IS) and whether AZD3366 and ticagrelor have additive effects.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats underwent 30 min ischemia. At 25 min of ischemia, animals received intravenous AZD3366 or vehicle. Additional animals received intravenous CGS15943 (an adenosine receptor blocker) or intraperitoneal ticagrelor. At 24 h reperfusion, IS was assessed by triphenyltetrazolium chloride. Other rats were subjected to 30 min ischemia followed by 1 h or 24 h reperfusion. Myocardial samples were assessed for adenosine levels, RT-PCR, and immunoblotting.

RESULTS

AZD3366 and ticagrelor reduced IS. The protective effect was blocked by CGS15943. The effect of AZD3366 + ticagrelor was significantly greater than AZD3366. One hour after infarction, myocardial adenosine levels significantly increased with AZD3366, but not with ticagrelor. In contrast, 24 h after infarction, adenosine levels were equally increased by AZD3366 and ticagrelor, and levels were higher in the AZD3366 + ticagrelor group. One hour after reperfusion, AZD3366 and ticagrelor equally attenuated the increase in interleukin-15 (an early inflammatory marker after ischemic cell death) levels, and their combined effects were additive. AZD3366, but not ticagrelor, significantly attenuated the increase in RIP1, RIP3, and P-MLKL (markers of necroptosis) 1 h after reperfusion. AZD3366, but not ticagrelor, significantly attenuated the increase in IL-6 and GSDMD-N (markers of pyroptosis) 1 h after reperfusion. At 24 h of reperfusion, both agents equally attenuated the increase in these markers, and their effects were additive.

CONCLUSIONS

AZD3366 attenuated inflammation, necrosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis and limited IS. The effects of AZD3366 and ticagrelor were additive.

Unveiling tumor immune evasion mechanisms: abnormal expression of transporters on immune cells in the tumor microenvironment

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a crucial driving factor for tumor progression and it can hinder the body's immune response by altering the metabolic activity of immune cells. Both tumor and immune cells maintain their proliferative characteristics and physiological functions through transporter-mediated regulation of nutrient acquisition and metabolite efflux. Transporters also play an important role in modulating immune responses in the TME. In this review, we outline the metabolic characteristics of the TME and systematically elaborate on the effects of abundant metabolites on immune cell function and transporter expression. We also discuss the mechanism of tumor immune escape due to transporter dysfunction. Finally, we introduce some transporter-targeted antitumor therapeutic strategies, with the aim of providing new insights into the development of antitumor drugs and rational drug usage for clinical cancer therapy.

The effects of P2Y12 adenosine receptors' inhibitors on central and peripheral chemoreflexes

Introduction: The most common side effect of ticagrelor is dyspnea, which leads to premature withdrawal of this life-saving medication in 6.5% of patients. Increased chemoreceptors' sensitivity was suggested as a possible pathophysiological explanation of this phenomenon; however, the link between oversensitization of peripheral and/or central chemosensory areas and ticagrelor intake has not been conclusively proved. Methods: We measured peripheral chemoreceptors' sensitivity using hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR), central chemoreceptors' sensitivity using hypercapnic hyperoxic ventilatory response (HCVR), and dyspnea severity before and 4 ± 1 weeks following ticagrelor initiation in 11 subjects with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The same tests were performed in 11 age-, sex-, and BMI-matched patients treated with clopidogrel. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.com at NCT05080478. Results: Ticagrelor significantly increased both HVR (0.52 ± 0.46 vs. 0.84 ± 0.69 L min-1 %-1; p < 0.01) and HCVR (1.05 ± 0.64 vs. 1.75 ± 1.04 L min-1 mmHg-1; p < 0.01). The absolute change in HVR correlated with the change in HCVR. Clopidogrel administration did not significantly influence HVR (0.63 ± 0.32 vs. 0.58 ± 0.33 L min-1%-1; p = 0.53) and HCVR (1.22 ± 0.67 vs. 1.2 ± 0.64 L min-1 mmHg-1; p = 0.79). Drug-related dyspnea was reported by three subjects in the ticagrelor group and by none in the clopidogrel group. These patients were characterized by either high baseline HVR and HCVR or excessive increase in HVR following ticagrelor initiation. Discussion: Ticagrelor, contrary to clopidogrel, sensitizes both peripheral and central facets of chemodetection. Two potential mechanisms of ticagrelor-induced dyspnea have been identified: 1) high baseline HVR and HCVR or 2) excessive increase in HVR or HVR and HCVR. Whether other patterns of changes in chemosensitivities play a role in the pathogenesis of this phenomenon needs to be further investigated.

A Case of Ticagrelor-Induced Sinus Pause

Ticagrelor is an oral antiplatelet agent commonly used following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There have been many reports describing bradyarrhythmias in the setting of ticagrelor use, most notably sinus pauses. This process is thought to be related to ticagrelor's inhibition of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter (hENT1), which reduces cellular uptake of adenosine. We present a case of a 58-year-old male who experienced prolonged sinus pauses 38 hours after starting ticagrelor following ST-elevation myocardial infarction with subsequent PCI and stent placement.

Platelet and Monocyte Activation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (POTENT-TAVR): A Mechanistic Randomized Trial of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel

Background

Inflammation and thrombosis are often linked mechanistically and are associated with adverse events after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) is especially common when clopidogrel is used in this setting, but its relevance to immune activation is unknown. We sought to determine whether residual activity at the purinergic receptor P2Y12 (P2Y12) promotes prothrombotic immune activation in the setting of TAVR.

Methods

This was a randomized trial of 60 patients (enrolled July 2015 through December 2018) assigned to clopidogrel (300mg load, 75mg daily) or ticagrelor (180mg load, 90 mg twice daily) before and for 30 days following TAVR. Co-primary endpoints were P2Y12-dependent platelet activity (Platelet Reactivity Units; VerifyNow) and the proportion of inflammatory (cluster of differentiation [CD] 14+/CD16+) monocytes 1 day after TAVR.

Results

Compared to clopidogrel, those randomized to ticagrelor had greater platelet inhibition (median Platelet Reactivity Unit [interquartile range]: (234 [170.0-282.3] vs. 128.5 [86.5-156.5], p < 0.001), but similar inflammatory monocyte proportions (22.2% [18.0%-30.2%] vs. 25.1% [22.1%-31.0%], p = 0.201) 1 day after TAVR. Circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates, soluble CD14 levels, interleukin 6 and 8 levels, and D-dimers were also similar across treatment groups. HRPR was observed in 63% of the clopidogrel arm and was associated with higher inflammatory monocyte proportions. Major bleeding events, pacemaker placement, and mortality did not differ by treatment assignment.

Conclusions

Residual P2Y12 activity after TAVR is common in those treated with clopidogrel but ticagrelor does not significantly alter biomarkers of prothrombotic immune activation. HRPR appears to be an indicator (not a cause) of innate immune activation in this setting.

Pathophysiological and Molecular Basis of the Side Effects of Ticagrelor: Lessons from a Case Report

Ticagrelor is currently considered a first-line choice in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following revascularization of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, its use is correlated with an increased incidence of two side effects, dyspnea and bradyarrhythmias, whose molecular mechanisms have not yet been defined with certainty and, consequently, neither of the therapeutic decisions they imply. We report the case of a patient with acute myocardial infarction treated with ticagrelor and aspirin as oral antithrombotic therapy after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), manifesting in a significant bradyarrhythmic episode that required a switch of antiplatelet therapy. Starting from this case report, this article aims to gather the currently available evidence regarding the molecular mechanisms underlying these side effects and propose possible decision-making algorithms regarding their management in clinical practice.

Impact of renal function on Ticagrelor-induced antiplatelet effects in coronary artery disease patients

Background

Chronic renal failure (CKD) is associated with the presence of increased platelet reactivity and lower clinical benefit of clopidogrel. Ticagrelor has a more favorable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile compared to clopidogrel, which has translated into better clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We conducted a prospective mechanistic cohort study in order to investigate the impact of renal failure on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor in patients with acute ACS.

Methods

Patients were divided into two groups based on their estimated renal clearances (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min and eGFR < 60 mL/min). Platelet function was determined using the VerifyNow system at baseline, after the ticagrelor loading dose and at discharge. In addition, levels of ticagrelor and its active metabolite (AR-C124910XX) were determined in the first hour after loading dose.

Results

48 patients were recruited (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min: 35 and eGFR < 60 mL/min: 13). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of platelet inhibition after the loading or after 7 days of treatment (p = 0.219). However, the levels of ticagrelor and its active metabolite were lower in subjects with normal renal function than in CKD, especially at 4 (p = 0.02 and 0.04 respectively) and 6 h of loading (p = 0.042 and 0.08 respectively).

Conclusion

No differences in platelet inhibition were observed after treatment with ticagrelor in patients with different renal function, although patients with renal impairment showed higher levels of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX after 4 h of the loading dose.

New Insights into Pathophysiology and New Risk Factors for ACS

Cardiovascular disease still represents the main cause of mortality worldwide. Despite huge improvements, atherosclerosis persists as the principal pathological condition, both in stable and acute presentation. Specifically, acute coronary syndromes have received substantial research and clinical attention in recent years, contributing to improve overall patients' outcome. The identification of different evolution patterns of the atherosclerotic plaque and coronary artery disease has suggested the potential need of different treatment approaches, according to the mechanisms and molecular elements involved. In addition to traditional risk factors, the finer portrayal of other metabolic and lipid-related mediators has led to higher and deep knowledge of atherosclerosis, providing potential new targets for clinical management of the patients. Finally, the impressive advances in genetics and non-coding RNAs have opened a wide field of research both on pathophysiology and the therapeutic side that are extensively under investigation.

Purinergic signaling in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury

Purines and their derivatives, extensively distributed in the body, act as a class of extracellular signaling molecules via a rich array of receptors, also known as purinoceptors (P1, P2X, and P2Y). They mediate multiple intracellular signal transduction pathways and participate in various physiological and pathological cell behaviors. Since the function in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI), this review summarized the involvement of purinergic signal transduction in diversified pathological processes, including energy metabolism disorder, oxidative stress injury, calcium overload, inflammatory immune response, platelet aggregation, coronary vascular dysfunction, and cell necrosis and apoptosis. Moreover, increasing evidence suggests that purinergic signaling also mediates the prevention and treatment of MIRI, such as ischemic conditioning, pharmacological intervention, and some other therapies. In conclusion, this review exhibited that purinergic signaling mediates the complex processes of MIRI which shows its promising application and prospecting in the future.

The Function and Regulation of Platelet P2Y12 Receptor

In addition to the key role in hemostasis and thrombosis, platelets have also been wildly acknowledged as immune regulatory cells and involving in the pathogenesis of inflammation-related diseases. Since purine receptor P2Y12 plays a crucial role in platelet activation, P2Y12 antagonists such as clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor have been widely used in cardiovascular diseases worldwide in recent decades due to their potent antiplatelet and antithrombotic effects. Meanwhile, the role of P2Y12 in inflammatory diseases has also been extensively studied. Relatively, there are few studies on the regulation of P2Y12. This review first summarizes the various roles of P2Y12 in the process of platelet activation, as well as downstream effects and signaling pathways; then introduces the effects of P2Y12 in inflammatory diseases such as sepsis, atherosclerosis, cancer, autoimmune diseases, and asthma; and finally reviews the current researches on P2Y12 regulation.

Nucleoside transporters and immunosuppressive adenosine signaling in the tumor microenvironment: Potential therapeutic opportunities

Adenosine compartmentalization has a profound impact on immune cell function by regulating adenosine localization and, therefore, extracellular signaling capabilities, which suppresses immune cell function in the tumor microenvironment. Nucleoside transporters, responsible for the translocation and cellular compartmentalization of hydrophilic adenosine, represent an understudied yet crucial component of adenosine disposition in the tumor microenvironment. In this review article, we will summarize what is known regarding nucleoside transporter's function within the purinome in relation to currently devised points of intervention (i.e., ectonucleotidases, adenosine receptors) for cancer immunotherapy, alterations in nucleoside transporter expression reported in cancer, and potential avenues for targeting of nucleoside transporters for the desired modulation of adenosine compartmentalization and action. Further, we put forward that nucleoside transporters are an unexplored therapeutic opportunity, and modulation of nucleoside transport processes could attenuate the pathogenic buildup of immunosuppressive adenosine in solid tumors, particularly those enriched with nucleoside transport proteins.

Endothelial biomarkers and platelet reactivity on ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients after acute coronary syndrome with and without concomitant type 2 diabetes: a preliminary observational study

BACKGROUND

Pleiotropic effects have been implicated in clinical benefits of ticagrelor compared to thienopyridine P2Y₁₂ antagonists. There are conflicting data regarding effects of ticagrelor vs. thienopyridine P2Y₁₂ blockers on endothelial function. Our aim was to compare endothelial biomarkers and their relations with platelet reactivity in real-world patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) on maintenance dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor or clopidogrel stratified by diabetes status.

METHODS

Biochemical indices of endothelial dysfunction/activation and platelet reactivity by multiple electrode aggregometry were compared in 126 stable post-ACS subjects (mean age: 65 ± 10 years, 92 men and 34 women), including patients with (n = 61) or without (n = 65) coexistent type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on uneventful maintenance DAPT with either ticagrelor (90 mg b.d.) or clopidogrel (75 mg o.d.) in addition to low-dose aspirin. Exclusion criteria included a complicated in-hospital course, symptomatic heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% and relevant coexistent diseases except for well-controlled diabetes, mild renal insufficiency or hypertension.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics were similar in patients on ticagrelor (n = 62) and clopidogrel (n = 64). The adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation and circulating soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) were decreased in ticagrelor users irrespective of T2DM status (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01 for platelet reactivity and sP-selectin, respectively). Plasma levels of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) were lower in T2DM subjects on ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel (758 ± 162 vs. 913 ± 217 µg/L, p < 0.01). In contrast, plasma sVCAM-1 was similar in non-diabetic patients on ticagrelor and clopidogrel (872 ± 203 vs. 821 ± 210 µg/L, p > 0.7). The concentrations of sE-selectin, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and asymmetric dimethylarginine did not differ according to the type of P2Y₁₂ antagonist regardless of T2DM status. Platelet reactivity was unrelated to any endothelial biomarker in subjects with or without T2DM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary findings may suggest an association of ticagrelor-based maintenance DAPT with favorable endothelial effects compared to clopidogrel users in stable post-ACS patients with T2DM. If proven, this could contribute to more pronounced clinical benefits of ticagrelor in diabetic subjects.

Carbohydrate-based drugs launched during 2000-2021

Carbohydrates are fundamental molecules involved in nearly all aspects of lives, such as being involved in formating the genetic and energy materials, supporting the structure of organisms, constituting invasion and host defense systems, and forming antibiotics secondary metabolites. The naturally occurring carbohydrates and their derivatives have been extensively studied as therapeutic agents for the treatment of various diseases. During 2000 to 2021, totally 54 carbohydrate-based drugs which contain carbohydrate moities as the major structural units have been approved as drugs or diagnostic agents. Here we provide a comprehensive review on the chemical structures, activities, and clinical trial results of these carbohydrate-based drugs, which are categorized by their indications into antiviral drugs, antibacterial/antiparasitic drugs, anticancer drugs, antidiabetics drugs, cardiovascular drugs, nervous system drugs, and other agents.

Efficacy of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in improving endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Ticagrelor and clopidogrel are antiplatelet drugs that act by binding to the adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor. Previous studies have compared between them regarding the endothelial function effect.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to summarize the evidence comparing the efficacy of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in improving endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

In August 2021, the Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library were searched systematically for eligible trials. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in improving endothelial function in patients with CAD.

RESULTS

Seven trials (n = 511) were included in our systematic review. Ticagrelor resulted in a greater elevation of the level of progenitor cells CD34+ KDR+ and CD34+ 133+ (P = 0.036 and P = 0.019, respectively), with a lower rate of endothelial cell apoptosis rate (P < 0.001). Moreover, ticagrelor showed superiority regarding nitric oxide, radical oxygen species, and soluble P-selectin levels (P = 0.03, P = 0.02, and P = 0.019, respectively). Flow-mediated dilation findings differed between the studies (P = 0.004 vs. P = 0.39).

CONCLUSION

Ticagrelor appears to exert an additional improvement in endothelial function compared with clopidogrel in patients with coronary heart disease.

Assessment of myocardial salvage in patients with STEMI undergoing thrombolysis: ticagrelor versus clopidogrel

Background

In the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the faster and stronger antiplatelet action of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel, as well as its pleiotropic effects, could result in a greater degree of cardioprotection and final infarct size (FIS) limitation. The aim of our study was to comparatively evaluate the effect of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on myocardial salvage index (MSI) in STEMI patients undergoing thrombolysis.

Methods

Forty-two STEMI patients treated with thrombolysis were randomized to receive clopidogrel (n = 21) or ticagrelor (n = 21), along with aspirin. Myocardial area at risk (AAR) was calculated according to the BARI and the APPROACH jeopardy scores. FIS was quantified by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) performed 5–6 months post-randomization. MSI was calculated as (AAR-FIS)/AAR × 100%. Primary endpoint of our study was MSI. Secondary endpoints were FIS and CMR-derived left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 5 –6 months post-randomization.

Results

By using the BARI score for AAR calculation, mean MSI was 52.25 ± 30.5 for the clopidogrel group and 54.29 ± 31.08 for the ticagrelor group (p = 0.83), while mean MSI using the APPROACH score was calculated at 51.94 ± 30 and 53.09 ± 32.39 (p = 0.9), respectively. Median CMR-derived FIS—as a percentage of LV—was 10.7% ± 8.25 in the clopidogrel group and 12.09% ± 8.72 in the ticagrelor group (p = 0.6). Mean LVEF at 5–6 months post-randomization did not differ significantly between randomization groups.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the administration of ticagrelor in STEMI patients undergoing thrombolysis offer a similar degree of myocardial salvage, compared to clopidogrel.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-02735-1.

Impact of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel on Coronary Microvascular Function After Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Coronary microvascular dysfunction after acute coronary syndrome is an important predictor of long-term prognosis. Data is lacking on the effects of oral P2Y₁₂-inhibitors on coronary microvascular function in non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare the acute effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel pretreatment on coronary microvascular function in non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients.

METHODS

Hospitalized non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients were randomized (1:1) to ticagrelor or clopidogrel. The index of microcirculatory resistance, coronary flow reserve, and resistive reserve ratio were obtained using an intracoronary pressure-temperature sensor-tipped wire.

RESULTS

In total, 128 patients were randomized between March 2018 and July 2020. Mean age 59.2±11.8 years, 84% were male, mean Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score was 93.7±24.5. Intracoronary physiological measurements were obtained in 118 patients (60 ticagrelor, 58 clopidogrel). In the infarct-related artery, the ticagrelor group had lower baseline index of microcirculatory resistance (22.0 [13.0-34.9] versus 27.7 [19.3-29.8]; P=0.02) and higher baseline resistive reserve ratio (3.0 [2.3-4.4] versus 2.4 [1.7-3.4]; P=0.01) compared with the clopidogrel group. A total of 88 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; 45 ticagrelor, 43 clopidogrel). The ticagrelor group had lower post-PCI index of microcirculatory resistance (22.0 [15.0-29.0] versus 27.0 [18.5-47.5]; P=0.02) and higher post-PCI resistive reserve ratio (3.0 [1.8-3.8] versus 1.8 [1.5-3.4]; P=0.006) compared with the clopidogrel group. The coronary flow reserve was not significantly different between the 2 groups at baseline or post-PCI. No between-group differences were seen in any of the indices in the non-infarct-related artery.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients, ticagrelor significantly improved coronary microvascular function before and after PCI compared with clopidogrel.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au; Unique identifier: ACTRN12618001610224.

Ticagrelor and the risk of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and other infections

AIMS

To investigate the 1-year risks of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB), sepsis, and pneumonia in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and were treated with ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this nationwide observational cohort study, 26 606 patients who underwent urgent or emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (January 2011-December 2017) and initiated treatment with ticagrelor [N = 20 073 (75.5%); median age 64 years (25th-75th percentile 55-72 years); 74.8% men] or clopidogrel [N = 6533 (24.5%); median age 68 years (25th-75th percentile 58-77 years); 70.2% men] were identified using Danish nationwide registries. The 1-year standardized absolute risks of outcomes was calculated based on cause-specific Cox regression models, and average treatment effects between treatment groups were obtained as standardized differences in absolute 1-year risks. The absolute 1-year risk of SAB was 0.10% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05-0.15%] in the ticagrelor group and 0.29% (95% CI, 0.17-0.42%) in the clopidogrel group. Compared with clopidogrel, treatment with ticagrelor was associated with a significantly lower absolute 1-year risk of SAB [absolute risk difference -0.19% (95% CI, -0.32% to -0.05%), P value 0.006]. Likewise, treatment with ticagrelor was associated with a significantly lower absolute 1-year risk of sepsis [0.99% (95% CI, 0.83-1.14%) vs. 1.49% (95% CI, 1.17-1.80%); absolute risk difference -0.50% (95% CI, -0.86% to -0.14%), P value 0.007] and pneumonia [3.13% (95% CI, 2.86-3.39%) vs. 4.56% (95% CI, 4.03-5.08%); absolute risk difference -1.43% (95% CI, -2.03% to -0.82%), P value < 0.001] compared with clopidogrel.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with ticagrelor was associated with a significantly lower 1-year risk of SAB, sepsis, and pneumonia compared with clopidogrel.

Heart Block Caused by Ticagrelor Use in a Patient Who Underwent Adenosine Diastolic Fractional Reserve Assessment: A Case Report

Ticagrelor is a direct and rapid-acting antagonist of the P2Y12-adenosine diphosphate receptor found on platelets. The drug is recommended as a first-line antiplatelet agent in patients with acute coronary syndromes, as evidenced in its superiority compared to clopidogrel according to the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes study. Specifically, the mechanism of action has been proven to show higher inhibition and less variability in its action on P2Y12 receptors compared to clopidogrel. Additionally, ticagrelor inhibits the equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 adenosine transporter protein leading to an increased concentration of adenosine in the blood, particularly at sites of ischemia. This effect increases the biological efficacy of ticagrelor in terms of cardioprotection, anticoagulation effects, and anti-inflammatory effects. However, the effects are also thought to be responsible for some of the adverse pharmacological effects reported with ticagrelor, such as bradycardia and ventricular pauses > 3 seconds. Herein, we report a case of recurrent sinus arrest and ventricular asystole in a patient pre-treated with ticagrelor and subsequent physiological assessment of a coronary lesion with fractional flow reserve using intravenous adenosine infusion.

Pharmacological Approaches to Limit Ischemic and Reperfusion Injuries of the Heart. Analysis of Experimental and Clinical Data on P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists

High mortality among people with acute myocardial infarction is one of the most urgent problems of modern cardiology. And in recent years, much attention has been paid to the search for pharmacological approaches to prevent heart damage. In this review, we tried to analyze data on the effect of P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists on the ischemia/reperfusion tolerance of the heart.

Ischemic and reperfusion injuries of the heart underlie the pathogenesis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and sudden cardiac death. The mortality rate is still high and is 5–7% in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The review is devoted to pharmacological approaches to limitation of ischemic and reperfusion injuries of the heart. The article analyzes experimental evidence and the clinical data on the effects of P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists on the heart’s tolerance to ischemia/reperfusion in animals with coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion and also in patients with AMI. Chronic administration of ticagrelor prevented adverse remodeling of the heart. There is evidence that sphingosine-1-phosphate is the molecule that mediates the infarct-reducing effect of P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists. It was discussed a role of adenosine in the cardioprotective effect of ticagrelor.

P2Y12-dependent activation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells promotes emergency hematopoiesis after myocardial infarction

Emergency hematopoiesis is the driving force of the inflammatory response to myocardial infarction (MI). Increased proliferation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (LSK) after MI enhances cell production in the bone marrow (BM) and replenishes leukocyte supply for local cell recruitment to the infarct. Decoding the regulation of the inflammatory cascade after MI may provide new avenues to improve post-MI remodeling. In this study, we describe the influence of adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-dependent P2Y₁₂-mediated signaling on emergency hematopoiesis and cardiac remodeling after MI. Permanent coronary ligation was performed to induce MI in a murine model. BM activation, inflammatory cell composition and cardiac function were assessed using global and platelet-specific gene knockout and pharmacological inhibition models for P2Y₁₂. Complementary in vitro studies allowed for investigation of ADP-dependent effects on LSK cells. We found that ADP acts as a danger signal for the hematopoietic BM and fosters emergency hematopoiesis by promoting Akt phosphorylation and cell cycle progression. We were able to detect P2Y₁₂ in LSK, implicating a direct effect of ADP on LSK via P2Y₁₂ signaling. P2Y₁₂ knockout and P2Y₁₂ inhibitor treatment with prasugrel reduced emergency hematopoiesis and the excessive inflammatory response to MI, translating to lower numbers of downstream progeny and inflammatory cells in the blood and infarct. Ultimately, P2Y₁₂ inhibition preserved cardiac function and reduced chronic adverse cardiac remodeling after MI. P2Y₁₂-dependent signaling is involved in emergency hematopoiesis after MI and fuels post-ischemic inflammation, proposing a novel, non-canonical value for P2Y₁₂ antagonists beyond inhibition of platelet-mediated atherothrombosis.

Cladribine as a Potential Object of Nucleoside Transporter-Based Drug Interactions

Cladribine is a nucleoside analog that is phosphorylated in its target cells (B and T-lymphocytes) to its active triphosphate form (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine triphosphate). Cladribine tablets 10 mg (Mavenclad^®), administered for up to 10 days per year in 2 consecutive years (3.5-mg/kg cumulative dose over 2 years), are used to treat patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Cladribine has been shown to be a substrate of various nucleoside transporters (NTs). Intestinal absorption and distribution of cladribine throughout the body appear to be essentially mediated by equilibrative NTs (ENTs) and concentrative NTs (CNTs), specifically by ENT1, ENT2, ENT4, CNT2 (low affinity), and CNT3. Other efficient transporters of cladribine are the ABC efflux transporters, specifically breast cancer resistance protein, which likely modulates the oral absorption and renal excretion of cladribine. A key transporter for the intracellular uptake of cladribine into B and T-lymphocytes is ENT1 with ancillary contributions of ENT2 and CNT2. Transporter-based drug interactions affecting absorption and target cellular uptake of a prodrug such as cladribine are likely to reduce systemic bioavailability and target cell exposure, thereby possibly hampering clinical efficacy. In order to manage optimized therapy, i.e., to ensure uncompromised target cell uptake to preserve the full therapeutic potential of cladribine, it is important that clinicians are aware of the existence of NT-inhibiting medicinal products, various lifestyle drugs, and food components. This article reviews the existing knowledge on inhibitors of NT, which may alter cladribine absorption, distribution, and uptake into target cells, thereby summarizing the existing knowledge on optimized methods of administration and concomitant drugs that should be avoided during cladribine treatment.

Ticagrelor improves systemic immune-inflammation index in acute coronary syndrome patients

OBJECTIVE

Inflammation plays a critical role in atherosclerosis. This study examines the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on inflammatory parameters, obtained from complete blood count (CBC) and biochemical measurements, in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients were included in the study and grouped according to clopidogrel (n = 50) or ticagrelor (n = 50) usage as an anti-aggregant (with acetylsalicylic acid). All patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. On admission, at third- and sixth-month after ACS, white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were calculated from the CBC and biochemical measurements. NLR, PLR, and SII were significantly lower in the ticagrelor group (p < 0.001, at 3rd and 6th month). Also, MHR was lower in the ticagrelor group (p < 0.05). Conversely, WBC count was higher in the ticagrelor group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

NLR, MHR, PLR, and SII levels were lower in ACS patients treating with ticagrelor. Ticagrelor may improve these inflammatory parameters in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-treated ACS patients compared to clopidogrel.

Recommended tool compounds and drugs for blocking P2X and P2Y receptors

This review article presents a collection of tool compounds that selectively block and are recommended for studying P2Y and P2X receptor subtypes, investigating their roles in physiology and validating them as future drug targets. Moreover, drug candidates and approved drugs for P2 receptors will be discussed.

Platelet inhibition by P2Y12 antagonists is potentiated by adenosine signalling activators

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists reduce platelet aggregation and the incidence of arterial thrombosis. Adenosine signalling in platelets directly affects cyclic nucleotide tone which we have previously shown to have a synergistic relationship with P2Y₁₂ inhibition. Several studies suggest that ticagrelor inhibits erythrocyte uptake of adenosine and that this could also contribute to its antiplatelet effects. We therefore examined the effects on platelet activation of adenosine signalling activators in combination with the P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists ticagrelor and prasugrel.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Human washed platelets, platelet-rich plasma, and whole blood were used to test the interactions between ticagrelor or prasugrel, and adenosine or 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA). Platelet reactivity to thrombin, PAR-1 activation or collagen was assessed by a combination of 96-well plate aggregometry, light transmission aggregometry, whole blood aggregometry, ATP release assay, and levels of cAMP.

KEY RESULTS

The inhibitory effects of ticagrelor and prasugrel on platelet aggregation and ATP release were enhanced in the presence of adenosine or NECA. Isobolographic analysis indicated a powerful synergy between P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibition and adenosine signalling activators. Increased levels of cAMP in platelets were also observed. In all cases, ticagrelor showed similar synergistic effects on platelet inhibition as prasugrel in the presence of adenosine or NECA.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

These results indicate that P2Y₁₂ antagonists have a synergistic relationship with adenosine signalling and that their efficacy may depend partly upon the presence of endogenous adenosine. This effect was common to both prasugrel and ticagrelor despite reports of differences in their effects upon adenosine reuptake.

A review of the effects of ticagrelor on adenosine concentration and its clinical significance

BACKGROUND

Ticagrelor is an oral antiplatelet drug that can reversibly bind to the platelet P2Y12 receptor. Ticagrelor is metabolized mainly by CYP3A4 and produces a rapid blood concentration-dependent platelet inhibitory effect. Unlike other P2Y12 receptor antagonists, many clinical features of ticagrelor are not related to P2Y12 receptor antagonism.

PURPOSE

This review aims to gather existing literature on the clinical effects of ticagrelor after inhibiting adenosine uptake.

METHODOLOGY

The current study reviewed literature related to the effects of ticagrelor on adenosine metabolism. The review also examined the drug's biological effects and clinical characteristics to see how it could be used in a clinical setting.

RESULTS

Many studies have shown that ticagrelor can inhibit equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1). This inhibition leads to intracellular adenosine uptake, increased adenosine half-life and plasma concentration levels and an enhanced adenosine-mediated biological effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the studies reviewed, it was found that ticagrelor essentially inhibits adenosine absorption of adenosine into cells through ENT1, which increases the concentration in the blood and subsequently increases the protection of the heart muscle by adenosine. It also prevents platelet aggregation, and extends the biological effects of coronary arteries. Moreover, it leads to a lower mortality rate in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.

Differential Inhibition of Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 (ENT1) Activity by Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Background and Objectives

Equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT) 1 is a widely-expressed drug transporter, handling nucleoside analogues as well as endogenous nucleosides. ENT1 has been postulated to be inhibited by some marketed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). To obtain insights into this point, the interactions of 24 TKIs with ENT1 activity have been analyzed.

Methods

Inhibition of ENT1 activity was investigated in vitro through quantifying the decrease of [³H]-uridine uptake caused by TKIs in HAP1 ENT2-knockout cells, exhibiting selective ENT1 expression. TKI effects towards ENT1-mediated transport were additionally characterized in terms of their in vivo relevance and of their relationship to TKI molecular descriptors. Putative transport of the TKI lorlatinib by ENT1/ENT2 was analyzed by LC-MS/MS.

Results

Of 24 TKIs, 12 of them, each used at 10 µM, were found to behave as moderate or strong inhibitors of ENT1, i.e., they decreased ENT1 activity by at least 35%. This inhibition was concentration-dependent for at least the strongest ones (IC₅₀ less than 10 µM) and was correlated with some molecular descriptors, especially with atom-type E-state indices. Lorlatinib was notably a potent in vitro inhibitor of ENT1/ENT2 (IC₅₀ values around 1.0–2.5 µM) and was predicted to inhibit these nucleoside transporters at relevant clinical concentrations, without, however, being a substrate for them.

Conclusion

Our data unambiguously add ENT1 to the list of drug transporters inhibited by TKIs, especially by lorlatinib. This point likely merits attention in terms of possible drug–drug interactions, notably for nucleoside analogues, whose ENT1-mediated uptake into their target cells may be hampered by co-administrated TKIs such as lorlatinib.

Long-term vascular function in CTO recanalization: A randomized clinical trial of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel

BACKGROUND

Coronary vascular function of a chronic coronary total occlusion (CTO) immediately after recanalization is known to be poor and to be partially improved by pre-treatment with loading dose of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel. It is unknown if this vascular dysfunction is maintained at long-term follow-up and may be improved by 1-year dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).

METHODS

The TIGER is a prospective, open-label, two parallel-group controlled clinical trial, which 1:1 randomized 50 CTO patients to pre-PCI loading dose and subsequent 1-year DAPT with ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel. Coronary blood flow (CBF) under stepwise adenosine infusion was assessed after drug loading dose and at follow-up and compared between the two drug groups, adjusting for time of follow-up.

RESULTS

Out of 50 patients with index CBF evaluation, 38 (76%) patients underwent angiographic follow-up (23 and 15 at 1 and 3-year, respectively) and Doppler data was available in 35 (70%). A high CBF area under the curve (AUC), already observed after loading dose in ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel group (p = 0.027), was maintained at follow-up (AUC 34815.22 ± 24,206.06 vs. AUC 22712.47 ± 13,768.95; p = 0.071). Specifically, whereas high ticagrelor loading dose-related CBF was sustained at follow-up (p = 0.933), clopidogrel loading dose-related CBF increased at follow-up (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

The TIGER trial showed that DAPT with ticagrelor maintained a non-significantly higher CBF in a recanalized CTO as compared to clopidogrel, whose treated patients exhibit a lower CBF immediately after PCI with a significant increase at follow-up. The clinical value of such sustained high coronary flow should be evaluated in a larger group of patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02211066 (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02211066).

Toward a Molecular Basis of Cellular Nucleoside Transport in Humans

Nucleosides play central roles in all facets of life, from metabolism to cellular signaling. Because of their physiochemical properties, nucleosides are lipid bilayer impermeable and thus rely on dedicated transport systems to cross biological membranes. In humans, two unrelated protein families mediate nucleoside membrane transport: the concentrative and equilibrative nucleoside transporter families. The objective of this review is to provide a broad outlook on the current status of nucleoside transport research. We will discuss the role played by nucleoside transporters in human health and disease, with emphasis placed on recent structural advancements that have revealed detailed molecular principles of these important cellular transport systems and exploitable pharmacological features.

Coronary microvascular injury in myocardial infarction: perception and knowledge for mitochondrial quality control

Endothelial cells (ECs) constitute the innermost layer in all blood vessels to maintain the structural integrity and microcirculation function for coronary microvasculature. Impaired endothelial function is demonstrated in various cardiovascular diseases including myocardial infarction (MI), which is featured by reduced myocardial blood flow as a result of epicardial coronary obstruction, thrombogenesis, and inflammation. In this context, understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms governing the function of coronary ECs is essential for the early diagnosis and optimal treatment of MI. Although ECs contain relatively fewer mitochondria compared with cardiomyocytes, they function as key sensors of environmental and cellular stress, in the regulation of EC viability, structural integrity and function. Mitochondrial quality control (MQC) machineries respond to a broad array of stress stimuli to regulate fission, fusion, mitophagy and biogenesis in mitochondria. Impaired MQC is a cardinal feature of EC injury and dysfunction. Hence, medications modulating MQC mechanisms are considered as promising novel therapeutic options in MI. Here in this review, we provide updated insights into the key role of MQC mechanisms in coronary ECs and microvascular dysfunction in MI. We also discussed the option of MQC as a novel therapeutic target to delay, reverse or repair coronary microvascular damage in MI. Contemporary available MQC-targeted therapies with potential clinical benefits to alleviate coronary microvascular injury during MI are also summarized.

The pleiotropic effects of antithrombotic drugs in the metabolic-cardiovascular-neurodegenerative disease continuum: impact beyond reduced clotting

Antithrombotic drugs are widely used for primary and secondary prevention, as well as treatment of many cardiovascular disorders. Over the past few decades, major advances in the pharmacology of these agents have been made with the introduction of new drug classes as novel therapeutic options. Accumulating evidence indicates that the beneficial outcomes of some of these antithrombotic agents are not solely related to their ability to reduce thrombosis. Here, we review the evidence supporting established and potential pleiotropic effects of four novel classes of antithrombotic drugs, adenosine diphosphate (ADP) P2Y12-receptor antagonists, Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor Inhibitors, and Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs), which include Direct Factor Xa (FXa) and Direct Thrombin Inhibitors. Specifically, we discuss the molecular evidence supporting such pleiotropic effects in the context of cardiovascular disease (CVD) including endothelial dysfunction (ED), atherosclerosis, cardiac injury, stroke, and arrhythmia. Importantly, we highlight the role of DOACs in mitigating metabolic dysfunction-associated cardiovascular derangements. We also postulate that DOACs modulate perivascular adipose tissue inflammation and thus, may reverse cardiovascular dysfunction early in the course of the metabolic syndrome. In this regard, we argue that some antithrombotic agents can reverse the neurovascular damage in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's brain and following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Overall, we attempt to provide an up-to-date comprehensive review of the less-recognized, beneficial molecular aspects of antithrombotic therapy beyond reduced thrombus formation. We also make a solid argument for the need of further mechanistic analysis of the pleiotropic effects of antithrombotic drugs in the future.

Anti-platelet Drug-loaded Targeted Technologies for the Effective Treatment of Atherothrombosis

Atherothrombosis results from direct interaction between atherosclerotic plaque and arterial thrombosis and is the most common type of cardiovascular disease. As a long term progressive disease, atherosclerosis frequently results in an acute atherothrombotic event through plaque rupture and platelet-rich thrombus formation. The pathophysiology of atherothrombosis involves cholesterol accumulation endothelial dysfunction, dyslipidemia, immuno-inflammatory, and apoptotic aspects. Platelet activation and aggregation is the major cause for stroke because of its roles, including thrombus, contributing to atherosclerotic plaque, and sealing off the bleeding vessel. Platelet aggregates are associated with arterial blood pressure and cardiovascular ischemic events. Under normal physiological conditions, when a blood vessel is damaged, the task of platelets within the circulation is to arrest the blood loss. Antiplatelet inhibits platelet function, thereby decreasing thrombus formation with complementary modes of action to prevent atherothrombosis. In the present scientific scenario, researchers throughout the world are focusing on the development of novel drug delivery systems to enhance patient's compliance. Immediate responding pharmaceutical formulations become an emerging trend in the pharmaceutical industries with better patient compliance. The proposed review provides details related to the molecular pathogenesis of atherothrombosis and recent novel formulation approaches to treat atherothrombosis with particular emphasis on commercial formulation and upcoming technologies.

Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with STEMI treated with thrombolysis: the MIRTOS trial

AIMS

We aimed to demonstrate whether coronary microvascular function is improved after ticagrelor administration compared to clopidogrel administration in STEMI subjects undergoing thrombolysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

MIRTOS is a multicentre study of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in STEMI subjects treated with fibrinolysis. We enrolled 335 patients <75 years old with STEMI eligible for thrombolysis, of whom 167 were randomised to receive clopidogrel and 168 to receive ticagrelor together with thrombolysis. Primary outcome was the difference in post-PCI corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC). All clinical events were recorded in a three-month follow-up period. From the 335 patients who were randomised, 259 underwent PCI (129 clopidogrel and 130 ticagrelor) and 154 angiographies were analysable for the study primary endpoint. No significant difference was found between the clopidogrel (n=85) and ticagrelor (n=69) groups for CTFC (24.33±17.35 vs 28.33±17.59, p=0.10). No significant differences were observed in MACE and major bleeding events between randomisation groups (OR 2.0, 95% CI: 0.18-22.2, p=0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombolysis with ticagrelor in patients <75 years old was not able to demonstrate superiority compared to clopidogrel in terms of microvascular injury, while there was no difference between the two groups in MACE and major bleeding events.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02429271. EudraCT Number 2014-004082-25.

Validation of an HPLC-MS/MS Method for the Determination of Plasma Ticagrelor and Its Active Metabolite Useful for Research and Clinical Practice

Ticagrelor is an antiplatelet agent which is extensively metabolized in an active metabolite: AR-C124910XX. Ticagrelor antagonizes P2Y12 receptors, but recently, this effect on the central nervous system has been linked to the development of dyspnea. Ticagrelor-related dyspnea has been linked to persistently high plasma concentrations of ticagrelor. Therefore, there is a need to develop a simple, rapid, and sensitive method for simultaneous determination of ticagrelor and its active metabolite in human plasma to further investigate the link between concentrations of ticagrelor, its active metabolite, and side effects in routine practice. We present here a new method of quantifying both molecules, suitable for routine practice, validated according to the latest Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines, with a good accuracy and precision (<15% respectively), except for the lower limit of quantification (<20%). We further describe its successful application to plasma samples for a population pharmacokinetics study. The simplicity and rapidity, the wide range of the calibration curve (2–5000 µg/L for ticagrelor and its metabolite), and high throughput make a broad spectrum of applications possible for our method, which can easily be implemented for research, or in daily routine practice such as therapeutic drug monitoring to prevent overdosage and occurrence of adverse events in patients.

Comparison of the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on heart rate variability and heart rate turbulence in patients with percutaneous coronary interventions

Introduction

Clopidogrel and ticagrelor are commonly used, antiplatelet agents. Ticagrelor has an effect of enhancing the plasma level of adenosine that may alter the autonomic function. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate turbulence (HRT).

Methods

Thirty subjects who performed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included in the randomized, crossover study. These patients were divided into two groups. Clopidogrel or ticagrelor was administered in two different testing sessions (1-month treatment for each session). In group 1, clopidogrel and ticagrelor treatment were used while in group 2, ticagrelor and clopidogrel treatment were used respectively. Three times rhythm Holter recording (baseline, 1st and 2nd month) was performed. The HRV (time domain and frequency domain) and HRT (turbulence onset (TO) and turbulence slope (TS)) parameters were analyzed from the Holter recordings.

Results

According to baseline Holter recording, pNN50 (5.82 ± 5.83 vs 10.56 ± 8.28; p = 0.03) and HF(nu) (6.85 ± 9.33 vs 9.53 ± 7.41; p = 0.04) parameters were higher in group 2 than in group 1, while TO(0.004 ± 0.02 vs −0.01 ± 0.02; p = 0.01) parameter was positive and higher in group 1 than in group 2. In the second month, the LF/HF ratio (4.47 ± 2.43 vs 3.18 ± 2.45; p = 0.04) was higher in group 1 than in group 2. However, when the evaluation was done within the groups themselves, there were no statistically significant differences in HRV and HRT parameters obtained before and after clopidogrel and ticagrelor administration in group 1 and group 2.

Conclusion

Ticagrelor and clopidogrel treatments did not have a significant effect on HRV and HRT parameters.

Inhibiting P2Y12 in Macrophages Induces Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Promotes an Anti-Tumoral Phenotype

The P2Y12 receptor is an adenosine diphosphate responsive G protein-coupled receptor expressed on the surface of platelets and is the pharmacologic target of several anti-thrombotic agents. In this study, we use liver samples from mice with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma to show that P2Y12 is expressed by macrophages in the liver. Using in vitro methods, we show that inhibition of P2Y12 with ticagrelor enhances tumor cell phagocytosis by macrophages and induces an anti-tumoral phenotype. Treatment with ticagrelor also increases the expression of several actors of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress pathways, suggesting activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR). Inhibiting the UPR with tauroursodeoxycholic acid (Tudca) diminishes the pro-phagocytotic effect of ticagrelor, thereby indicating that P2Y12 mediates macrophage function through activation of ER stress pathways. This could be relevant in the pathogenesis of chronic liver disease and cancer, as macrophages are considered key players in these inflammation-driven pathologies.

Ticagrelor-Related Severe Dyspnoea: Mechanisms, Characteristic Features, Differential Diagnosis and Treatment

With a growing number of patients on ticagrelor therapy after stent implantation, we observe many cases of side effects of the drug, mostly dyspnoea and bradycardia. In our article we present 2 patients, in which the symptoms were particularly severe. Then we describe possible mechanisms of these complications, explain how to carry out differential diagnosis, discuss when to switch ticagrelor to other antiplatelet drug and finally we present the way to deal with the symptoms.