Comparison of Postoperative Bleeding in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients Receiving Rivaroxaban, Enoxaparin, or Aspirin for Thromboprophylaxis

The Use of Aspirin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients Who Have Morbid Obesity Undergoing Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a major clinical concern due to its life-threatening nature, and obese and morbidly obese patients are thought to be at an increased risk for VTE. The aims of this study were twofold; first, to explore VTE rates in patients who have a body mass index (BMI) > 40 undergoing primary and revision total joint arthroplasty, and second, to investigate aspirin (ASA) efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We identified all patients (n = 4,672) who had a BMI > 40 who underwent primary and revision total joint arthroplasty from 2016 to 2022 at a single academic tertiary care center. Patients were stratified by BMI groups: 40 to 44.9 (n = 3,462), 45 to 49.9 (n = 935), and 50+ (n = 275). The primary outcome was any VTE event within 90 days postoperatively. The secondary outcome consisted of wound complications within 90 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

The total VTE rate was 0.4% (n = 21) and did not differ statistically between the BMI groups (0.4 versus 0.4 versus 0.7%, P = .669). The VTEs consisted of 6 deep venous thromboses (DVTs), 14 pulmonary embolisms, and one concomitant deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The VTE rates were not statistically different between patients who received aspirin 325 mg 0.5% (n = 9), aspirin 81 mg 0.2% (n = 1), aspirin + anticoagulant (AC) 0.5% (n = 6), and AC alone 0.4% (n = 5) (P = .954). In addition, wound complications did not differ significantly between patients who received ASA 325 mg, ASA 81mg, ASA + AC, or AC alone (1.6 versus 1.0 versus 1.8 versus 1.1%, P = .351).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of aspirin 325 and 81 mg was found to have similar VTE rates as aspirin + ACs and ACs alone, with no significant increase in wound complications. In patients who have a BMI > 40, the use of aspirin is a safe option for VTE prophylaxis and should be prescribed in the context of the patient who has other risk factors for VTE.

Risks of major bleeding and venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total hip or total knee arthroplasty using therapeutic dosages of DOACs

About 1.5% of patients undergoing total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) still develop postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE), indicating that the current thromboprophylaxis strategy is not optimal. To evaluate the feasibility of therapeutic dosages of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as thromboprophylaxis for high VTE risk patients, we determined the risks of major bleeding and VTE in patients who underwent THA/TKA and were treated with DOACs in therapeutic dosages for atrial fibrillation (AF). We conducted a registry-based cohort study from 2010 to 2018 in Denmark and included AF patients on therapeutic DOACs dose who underwent THA/TKA. AF patients were utilized as proxy since they have a life-long indication for therapeutic anticoagulant medication. The 49-days cumulative incidence (with death as competing risk) of major bleeding was assessed. The same was done for VTE at 49- and 90-days. 1,354 THA and TKA procedures were included. The 49-days cumulative incidence of major bleeding was 1.40% (95%Confidence Interval[CI] 0.88-2.14%). Most bleeding events occurred at the surgical site. The cumulative incidence of VTE at 49-days was 0.59% (95%CI 0.28-1.13%) and 0.74% (95%CI 0.38-1.32%) at 90-days. The incidence of major bleeding in THA/TKA patients on DOACs in therapeutic dosages was in line with previously reported incidences among THA/TKA patients on thromboprophylaxis dosages, while the incidence of VTE was relatively low. These data provide a solid basis for the design of randomized controlled trials to establish the safety and efficacy of therapeutic dosages of DOACs to prevent VTE in high-risk patients.

[Translated article] Risk of venous thromboembolism in thromboprophylaxis between aspirin and low molecular weight heparins after total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of aspirin versus low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) for the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and/or total hip arthroplasty (THA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Sixteen studies were selected. The risk of VTE, DVT and PE were analysed. Mortality, risk of bleeding and surgical wound complications was also analysed.

RESULTS

248,461 patients were included. 176,406 patients with thromboprophylaxis with LMWH and 72,055 patients with aspirin thromboprophylaxis. There were no significant differences in the risk of VTE (OR=0.93; 95% CI: 0.69-1.26; p=0.64), DVT (OR=0.72; 95% CI: 0.43-1.20; p=0.21) or PE (OR=1.13; 95% CI: 0.86-1.49; p=0.38) between both groups. No significant differences were found in mortality (p=0.30), bleeding (p=0.22), or complications in the surgical wound (p=0.85) between both groups. These same findings were found in the sub-analysis of only randomised clinical trials (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

No increased risk of PE, DVT, or VTE was found among patients with aspirin thromboprophylaxis versus patients with LMWH thromboprophylaxis. There was also no greater mortality, greater bleeding, or greater complications in the surgical wound found among patients with aspirin thromboprophylaxis versus patients with LMWH thromboprophylaxis.

Risk of venous thromboembolism in thromboprophylaxis between aspirin and low molecular weight heparins after total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of aspirin versus low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) for the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and/or total hip arthroplasty (THA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Sixteen studies were selected. The risk of VTE, DVT and PE were analyzed. Mortality, risk of bleeding and surgical wound complications was also analyzed.

RESULTS

248,461 patients were included. 176,406 patients with thromboprophylaxis with LMWH and 72,055 patients with aspirin thromboprophylaxis. There were no significant differences in the risk of VTE (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.69-1.26; P = .64), DVT (OR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.43-1.20; P = .21) or PE (OR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.86-1.49; P = .38) between both groups. No significant differences were found in mortality (P = .30), bleeding (P = .22), or complications in the surgical wound (P = .85) between both groups. These same findings were found in the sub-analysis of only randomized clinical trials (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

No increased risk of PE, DVT, or VTE was found among patients with aspirin thromboprophylaxis versus patients with LMWH thromboprophylaxis. There was also no greater mortality, greater bleeding, or greater complications in the surgical wound found among patients with aspirin thromboprophylaxis versus patients with LMWH thromboprophylaxis.

Aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The article aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of aspirin with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for thromboprophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery patients. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library database were searched for studies comparing aspirin and LMWH in venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis until 25 April 2023. The outcome measures included deep venous thrombosis(DVT)/Pulmonary embolism(PE) events, major bleeding events, wound complications, wound infection and death. Six studies met the requirements of our meta-analysis, including 12 470 patients in the aspirin group and 10 857 patients in the LMWH group. The meta-analysis showed that results showed that LMWH was superior to aspirin in preventing VTE events (odds ratio (OR) 1.44, 95% CI 1.24-1.68, P  < 0.00001), whereas there was no significant difference between them in bleeding events (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.05, P  = 0.33), wound complication (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.28-1.17, P  = 0.13), wound infection (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.86-1.47, P  = 0.39) and mortality (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.70-1.55, P  = 0.83). In addition, subgroup analysis showed that compared with aspirin, LMWH was more likely to reduce the incidence of DVT events in orthopaedic surgery patients (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.33-1.91, P  < 0.00001), whereas there was no advantage in reducing the incidence of PE events (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.62-2.40, P  = 0.56). Despite the similar safety profiles, this meta-analysis showed that LMWH was significantly superior to aspirin in thromboprophylaxis after orthopaedic surgery. LMWH was still the first-line drug for thrombosis prevention in patients who underwent major orthopaedic surgeries.

Venous thromboembolism in orthopedic surgery: Global guidelines

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a severe complication that can occur after major orthopedic procedures. As VTE-related morbidity and mortality are a significant concern for both medical professionals and patients, and preventative measures are typically employed. Multiple organizations, including the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS), have developed guidelines for VTE prophylaxis specifically in patients undergoing joint replacement procedures. However, recently, the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) was convened, which brought together over 600 experts from 68 countries and 135 international societies. These experts, spanning a range of medical disciplines including orthopedic surgery, anesthesia, cardiology, hematology, vascular, and internal medicine, conducted a comprehensive review of the literature using a strict Delphi process to generate practical recommendations for VTE prophylaxis across all types of orthopedic procedures. This review article summarizes some of the recommendations of the ICM.

Safety and Efficacy of Rivaroxaban in Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

An optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis agent should balance efficacy and safety. While rivaroxaban provides effective venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty, it may be associated with higher rates of bleeding. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban to aspirin and enoxaparin.

METHODS

A large national database was queried for patients who underwent elective primary total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from January 2015 through December 2020 who received rivaroxaban, aspirin, or enoxaparin. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the 90-day risk of bleeding and thromboembolic complications. Among TKA patients identified, 86,721 (10.8%) received rivaroxaban, 408,038 (50.8%) received aspirin, and 108,377 (13.5%) received enoxaparin. Among THA patients, 42,469 (9.5%) received rivaroxaban, 242,876 (54.5%) received aspirin, and 59,727 (13.4%) received enoxaparin.

RESULTS

After accounting for confounding factors, rivaroxaban was associated with increased risk of transfusion (TKA: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.58, P < .001; THA: aOR 1.64, P < .001), pulmonary embolism (TKA: aOR = 1.25, P = .007), and deep vein thrombosis (TKA: aOR = 1.13, P = .022) compared to aspirin. Compared to enoxaparin, rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of combined bleeding events (TKA: aOR = 1.07, P < .001, THA: aOR = 1.11, P < .001), but decreased risk of combined prothrombotic events (THA: aOR = 0.85, P = .036).

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban chemoprophylaxis following TKA and THA was associated with an increased risk of bleeding and prothrombotic complications compared to aspirin and enoxaparin.

Using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding (MBE) are feared complications that are influenced by numerous host and surgical related factors. Using machine learning on contemporary data, our aim was to develop and validate a practical, easy-to-use algorithm to predict risk for VTE and MBE following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This was a single institutional study of 35,963 primary and revision total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients operated between 2009 and 2020. Fifty-six variables related to demographics, comorbidities, operative factors as well as chemoprophylaxis were included in the analysis. The cohort was divided to training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Four machine learning models were developed for each of the outcomes assessed (VTE and MBE). Models were created for all VTE grouped together as well as for pulmonary emboli (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) individually to examine the need for distinct algorithms. For each outcome, the model that best performed using repeated cross validation was chosen for algorithm development, and predicted versus observed incidences were evaluated. Of the 35,963 patients included, 308 (0.86%) developed VTE (170 PE's, 176 DVT's) and 293 (0.81%) developed MBE. Separate models were created for PE and DVT as they were found to outperform the prediction of VTE. Gradient boosting trees had the highest performance for both PE (AUC-ROC 0.774 [SD 0.055]) and DVT (AUC-ROC 0.759 [SD 0.039]). For MBE, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) analysis had the highest AUC (AUC-ROC 0.803 [SD 0.035]). An algorithm that provides the probability for PE, DVT and MBE for each specific patient was created. All 3 algorithms had good discriminatory capability and cross-validation showed similar probabilities comparing predicted and observed failures indicating high accuracy of the model. We successfully developed and validated an easy-to-use algorithm that accurately predicts VTE and MBE following TJA. This tool can be used in every-day clinical decision making and patient counseling.

Development of prediction models for complications after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: a single-centre retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop prediction models for patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to predict the risk for surgical complications based on personal factors, comorbidities and medication use.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care in outpatient clinic of university medical centre.

PARTICIPANTS

3776 patients with a primary THA or TKA between 2004 and 2018.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Multivariable logistic regression models were developed for primary outcome surgical site infection (SSI), and secondary outcomes venous thromboembolism (VTE), postoperative bleeding (POB), luxation, delirium and nerve damage (NER).

RESULTS

For SSI, age, smoking status, body mass index, presence of immunological disorder, diabetes mellitus, liver disease and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were included. An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 71.9% (95% CI=69.4% to 74.4%) was found. For this model, liver disease showed to be the strongest predictor with an OR of 10.7 (95% CI=2.4 to 46.6). The models for POB and NER showed AUCs of 73.0% (95% CI=70.7% to 75.4%) and 76.6% (95% CI=73.2% to 80.0%), respectively. For delirium an AUC of 85.9% (95% CI=83.8% to 87.9%) was found, and for the predictive algorithms for luxation and VTE we found least favourable results (AUC=58.4% (95% CI=55.0% to 61.8%) and AUC=66.3% (95% CI=62.7% to 69.9%)).

CONCLUSIONS

Discriminative ability was reasonable for SSI and predicted probabilities ranged from 0.01% to 51.0%. We expect this to enhance shared decision-making in considering THA or TKA since current counselling is predicated on population-based probability of risk, rather than using personalised prediction. We consider our models for SSI, delirium and NER appropriate for clinical use when taking underestimation and overestimation of predicted risk into account. For VTE and POB, caution concerning overestimation exceeding a predicted probability of 0.08 for VTE and 0.05 for POB should be taken into account. Furthermore, future studies should evaluate clinical impact and whether the models are feasible in an external population.

Postoperative bleeding complications in patients with hemophilia undergoing major orthopedic surgery: A prospective multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

Persons with hemophilia (PWH) are at risk for chronic hemophilic arthropathy (HA). Joint replacement surgery may be used to relieve intractable pain and/or restore joint function.

OBJECTIVES

This multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study evaluated the rate of bleeding during the postoperative period after total hip (THA) or knee arthroplasty (TKA).

PATIENTS/METHODS

We included PWH of any severity ≥18 years of age who were undergoing THA or TKA. Clinical decisions were made at the discretion of the treating physician according to local standards of care. Clinical data were prospectively recorded. Major bleeding was defined as bleeding in a critical site, bleeding that resulted in either a 2 g/dl or greater decrease in hemoglobin during any 24-h period, or transfusion of two or more units of packed red blood cells.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-one procedures (98 TKA and 33 THA) were performed, 39 (29.8%) of which were complicated by major bleeding, including 46% of THA and 25% of TKA. The risk of major bleeding was increased in THA compared to TKA (OR 2.50, p = .05), and by the presence of an inhibitor (OR 4.29, p = .04), increased BMI (OR 4.49 and 6.09 for overweight and obese, respectively, compared to normal BMI, each p < .01), and non-use of an antifibrinolytic medication (OR 3.00, p = .03). Neither continuous clotting factor infusion (versus bolus infusion) nor pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis were associated with bleeding risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The bleeding risk remains substantial after THA and TKA in PWH, despite factor replacement. Use of antifibrinolytic medications is associated with decreased risk.

Aspirin Thromboprophylaxis Is Associated With Less Major Bleeding Events Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is ongoing debate on what is optimal prophylactic agent to reduce venous thromboembolism (VTE) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Although many studies assess the efficacy of these agents in VTE prevention, no attention is given to their adverse effect on major bleeding events (MBEs). This study compared the incidence of MBE in patients receiving aspirin as VTE prophylaxis vs other chemoprophylaxis.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective study of 35,860 patients undergoing TJA between 2009 and 2020 was conducted. Demographic variables, co-morbidities, type of chemoprophylaxis, and intraoperative factors were collected. MBE was defined using the 2010 criteria for major bleeding in surgical patients presented by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. To enhance capture rate, comprehensive queries utilizing MBE keywords were conducted in clinical notes, physician dictations, and phone call logs. Univariate followed by multivariate regression was performed as well as propensity score matched analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 270 patients (0.75%) in this cohort developed MBE. The MBE rate was 0.5% in the aspirin group and 1.2% in the non-aspirin group. After adjusting for confounders, multiple logistic regression and propensity score matched analysis revealed almost 2 times lower odds of MBE in patients who received aspirin. Variables independently associated with increased MBE risk included increasing age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, revision surgery, peptic ulcer disease, coagulopathy, intraoperative blood transfusion, and active smoking.

CONCLUSION

Administration of aspirin for VTE prophylaxis, compared to other chemoprophylaxis agents may have an association with lower risk of major bleeding following TJA. Future randomized controlled trials should examine these findings.

Preventing Venous Thromboembolism after elective total hip arthroplasty surgery - are the current guidelines appropriate? Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in elective total hip arthroplasty surgery

INTRODUCTION

Venous Thromboembolism after elective Total Hip Arthroplasty surgery is a well-recognised complication, resulting in fatal pulmonary embolism, post thrombotic syndrome and recurrent thrombotic episodes. Guidelines developed by clinical organisations attempt to provide evidence-based recommendations to clinicians.

METHODS

This narrative review evaluated the current available literature in relation to the available guidelines, to evaluate whether the current major guidelines reflect the evidence base. All major clinical guidelines were collated through database searching, alongside the relevant clinical studies.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The promotion of a multi-modal approach, combining mechanical and chemical prophylaxis, does appear to be well validated, with mechanical prophylaxis offering positive clinical effects with little negative clinical consequence. Within the current guidelines surrounding VTE prevention in the elective-THA patient, there does appear to be a lack of prescription in relation to risk stratification and adopting personalised approaches for specific patient subsets.

CONCLUSION

We suggest moving away from protocolisation of VTE prevention, given the evidence base is not fully developed to allow a 'one-size-fits-all' approach.

EFFECTIVENESS OF DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS PREVENTION IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis protocol in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), and to verify differences in the rates of this complication when comparing primary replacement surgeries with revision surgeries.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients operated between 2012 and 2018, with inclusion and non-inclusion criteria determined by the researchers. A protocol was created to compile data including 92 patients, amounting to 110 operated hips, divided by gender, age, laterality, among other criteria. For THA cases, low molecular weight heparin chemoprophylaxis was used, associated with the use of pneumatic and elastic compression, concomitant to deambulation as soon as possible. The detection of DVT was determined by clinical evaluation and imaging exams such as: simple radiographs, ultrasound, arterial and venous color doppler, and laboratory tests.

RESULTS

The use of the protocol was very effective in our study. Only one (1.09%) case of deep venous thrombosis was found.

CONCLUSION

The use of thromboprophylaxis for DVT is indispensable, as was clearly demonstrated by these cases. We observed only one (1.09%) case of DVT in our series. Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Study.

A risk-stratified approach to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with aspirin or warfarin following total hip and knee arthroplasty: A cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding events following total knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA) are associated with significant morbidity. Clinical guidelines recommend administration of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis post-operatively, although controversy exists regarding optimal prophylactic strategies.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients who underwent elective TKA/TKA in an academic medical center. Patients were stratified by surgery type (TKA/THA) and VTE risk determined by a novel risk stratification protocol and compared pre- and post-protocol implementation. Patients received warfarin pre-protocol and either aspirin or warfarin post-protocol for VTE prophylaxis. Natural language processing identified VTE events and ICD codes were used to identify bleeding events, with all events validated manually.

RESULTS

A total of 1379 surgeries were included for analysis, 839 TKAs and 540 THAs. Post-protocol implementation, 445 (94.1%) patients following TKA and 294 (97.4%) patients following THA received aspirin for VTE prophylaxis. A significant reduction in bleeding events (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.19, p = 0.048) was observed in low-risk THA patients treated with aspirin (post-protocol) compared patients treated with warfarin (pre-protocol). Bleeding events did not differ significantly between low-risk TKA patients treated with aspirin or warfarin. No significant differences in VTE events were observed following the protocol implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a novel risk stratification system to guide VTE prophylaxis selection between aspirin or warfarin following TKA and THA appears safe and effective. Among low-risk patients, aspirin use was associated with fewer bleeding events following THA, without an observed increase in VTE events.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism with aspirin following knee surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication following orthopaedic surgery. The incidence of this complication has decreased substantially since the introduction of routine thromboprophylaxis. However, concerns have been raised about increased bleeding complications caused by aggressive thromboprophylaxis.Attention has grown for aspirin as a safer thromboprophylactic agent following orthopaedic surgery.A systematic review using MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of aspirin prophylaxis following knee surgery with the current standard prophylactic agents (low molecular weight heparin [LMWH], vitamin K antagonists and factor Xa inhibitors).No significant difference in effectiveness of VTE prevention was found between aspirin, LMWH and warfarin. Factor Xa inhibitors were more effective, but increased bleeding complications were reported.As evidence is limited and of low quality with substantial heterogeneity, further research with high-quality, adequately powered trials is needed. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:892-904. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200120.

Is Apixaban Safe and Effective for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Primary Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasties?

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Apixaban is approved for VTE prophylaxis. This study seeks to ascertain the risk of VTE and bleeding complications in patients undergoing primary THA and TKA receiving apixaban for postoperative VTE prophylaxis for one of the following indications: high risk for VTE, previously on apixaban, and contraindication to the use of aspirin.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent primary THA or TKA over a 17-month period and were prescribed apixaban for thromboprophylaxis postoperatively.

RESULTS

230 patients were included in the study, 110 TKA and 120 THA. The primary reasons for high-risk VTE status included personal and family history of VTE, and 13% were taking apixaban preoperatively for atrial fibrillation. 1 patient (0.43%) who underwent TKA had a DVT with PE. 2.6% of patients had wound complications requiring operative treatment, and 0.87% of THA patients underwent revision arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

The use of apixaban for VTE prophylaxis after primary THA and TKA in patients at high risk for VTE, in patients previously on apixaban, and in patients with a contraindication to the use of aspirin is associated with a low risk of VTE and bleeding complications.

A retrospective analysis of bleeding risk with rivaroxaban, enoxaparin, and aspirin following total joint arthroplasty or revision

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Rivaroxaban, enoxaparin, and aspirin are commonly used medications for thromboprophylaxis following lower extremity joint arthroplasty or revision. Previous research has demonstrated efficacy in preventing venous thromboembolism with each medication, however, the comparative risk of bleeding between them remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to compare the odds of bleeding between rivaroxaban, enoxaparin, and aspirin following lower extremity joint arthroplasty or revision.

DESIGN

This is a 3-year retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Data were obtained from 148 facilities across 55 states and territories of the United States.

PATIENTS

This study included 85,938 patients who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty or revision.

INTERVENTION

Patients received enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, or aspirin as monotherapy for thromboprophylaxis.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was all bleeding, classified as major or minor bleeding, occurring in the 40 days following surgery. The secondary outcome was venous thromboembolism.

MAIN RESULTS

Among 85,938 patients, 10,465 received rivaroxaban, 14,047 received enoxaparin, and 61,426 received aspirin. Bleeding occurred in 126 (1.20%) patients with rivaroxaban, 253 (1.80%) with enoxaparin, and 611 (0.99%) with aspirin. There was a significant increase in odds of bleeding in the enoxaparin compared to aspirin group odds ratio (OR) 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.38, p = 0.042), and a trend toward increased odds of bleeding in rivaroxaban compared to aspirin group (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.99-1.47, p = 0.058) and rivaroxaban compared to enoxaparin (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82-1.28, p = 0.827). Odds of venous thromboembolism were not statistically significant between all three study medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Among rivaroxaban, enoxaparin, and aspirin used for thromboprophylaxis in knee and hip arthroplasty or revision, aspirin had significantly decreased odds of bleeding complications compared to enoxaparin. Although not statistically significant, aspirin also had a trend toward decreased odds of bleeding complications compared to rivaroxaban. Our study results suggest that aspirin is a safer alternative for use in postoperative thromboprophylaxis following lower extremity joint arthroplasty or revision.

A Retrospective Analysis Comparing Post-Operative Bleeding with Various Doses of Aspirin after Lower Extremity Joint Arthroplasty or Revision

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have shown that aspirin is noninferior to other anticoagulation therapies in preventing postoperative venous thromboembolism following lower extremity arthroplasty or revision; however, its optimal dosing for this indication is less clear. This study aims to compare the odds of bleeding between different aspirin dosages following lower extremity joint arthroplasty or revision.

DESIGN

This is a 3-year retrospective multi-center cohort study across the United States and its territories.

SETTING

This study included patients admitted for total hip or knee arthroplasty or revision and were treated with prophylactic aspirin.

PATIENTS, INTERVENTION, MEASUREMENTS

Patients were assigned to groups based on a total daily aspirin dose of 81, 162, 325, or 650 mg. Data were analyzed for postsurgical bleeding and thromboembolism events occurring during the initial admission and up to 40 days following surgery. Other exploratory variables included type of surgery, hip or knee arthroplasty, length of stay, and patient demographic data.

MAIN RESULTS

Among 53,848 patients receiving aspirin, 3922 received a total daily dose of 81 mg, 19,341 received a total daily dose of 162 mg, 5256 received a total daily dose of 325 mg, and 25,329 received a total daily dose of 650 mg. Bleeding occurred in 466 (0.87%) patients and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in 209 patients (0.39%). The odds of bleeding were compared using logistic regression, with the 650-mg dose as the reference group. None were statistically significant for bleeding between all studied aspirin doses: 81 mg (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.83-1.51, p = 0.451), 162 mg (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.67-1.03, p = 0.097), and 325 mg (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.59-1.13, p = 0.245). The odds of VTE were also not statistically significant: 81 mg (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.40-1.17, p = 0.181), 162 mg (OR 0.75 95% CI 0.54-1.03, p = 0.072), and 325 mg (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.64-1.53, p = 0.989).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in the odds of bleeding or venous thromboembolism among all studied aspirin dosages in patients receiving aspirin for thromboprophylaxis following lower extremity joint arthroplasty or revision.

Does venous thromboembolism prophylaxis affect the risk of venous thromboembolism and adverse events following primary hip and knee replacement? A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The optimum chemical venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylactic agents following total hip and knee replacement (THR and TKR) remain unknown. NICE recommends multiple agents, including direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and aspirin. We assessed whether VTE prophylaxis affected the risk of VTE and adverse events following primary THR and TKR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed 982 elective primary THRs (59%) and TKRs (41%) at a large tertiary centre during 2018. The primary outcome was any VTE (DVT and/or PE) within 90-days. Secondary outcomes were adverse events within 90-days (major bleeding and wound complications). The association between VTE prophylaxis and outcomes was assessed.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of VTE and adverse events were 2.7% (n = 27) and 15.2% (n = 136) respectively. The most common agents used were DOAC ± LMWH (50.7%, n = 498), followed by aspirin ± LMWH (35.5%, n = 349) and LMWH alone (4.7%, n = 46). The risk of VTE (aspirin ± LMWH = 3.7%, DOAC = 2.0%, LMWH = 2.2%) was not significantly different between agents (p = 0.294). The risk of any adverse event was significantly higher (p < 0.001) with aspirin ± LMWH (16.1%; n = 56) and LMWH (28.3%; n = 13) compared with DOACs ± LMWH (7.0%; n = 35) in TKRs only, there was no differences between agents for adverse events in THRs (p = 0.644).

CONCLUSIONS

Choice of thromboprophylaxis did not influence the risk of VTE following primary THR and TKR. DOACs (+/- LMWH) were associated with the lowest risk of adverse events. Large multicentre trials are still needed to assess the efficacy and safety of these agents following THR and TKR.

Perioperative Management of Chronic Antithrombotic Agents in Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Total hip and knee arthroplasty are common major orthopedic operations being performed on an increasing number of patients. Many patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are on chronic antithrombotic agents due to other medical conditions, such as atrial fibrillation or acute coronary syndrome. Given the risk of bleeding associated with TJAs, as well as the risk of thromboembolic events in the post-operative period, the management of chronic antithrombotic agents perioperatively is critical to achieving successful outcomes in arthroplasty. In this review, we provide a concise overview of society guidelines regarding the perioperative management of chronic antithrombotic agents in the setting of elective TJAs and summarize the recent literature that may inform future guidelines. Ultimately, antithrombotic regimen management should be patient-specific, in consultation with cardiology, internal medicine, hematology, and other physicians who play an essential role in perioperative care.

Rivaroxaban versus aspirin in prevention of venous thromboembolism following total joint arthroplasty or hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis

Objective

To evaluates the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus aspirin in prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following total hip (THA) or knee arthroplasty (TKA) or hip fracture surgery.

Methods

Major databases were systematically searched for all relevant studies published in English up to October 2020. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

In total, 7 studies were retrieved which contained 5133 patients. Among these patients, 2605 patients (50.8%) received rivaroxaban, whereas 2528 patients (49.2%) received aspirin. There were no statistical difference between aspirin and rivaroxaban for reducing VTE (RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.50–1.11, I² = 36%, p = 0.15), major bleeding (RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.45–2.37, I² = 21%, p = 0.95), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.12–6.44, I² = 0%, p = 0.90) between the two groups. Compared with aspirin, rivaroxaban significantly increased nonmajor bleeding (RR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.05–1.58, I² = 0%, p = 0.02).

Conclusion

There was no significant difference between aspirin and rivaroxaban in prevention of venous thromboembolism following total joint arthroplasty or hip fracture surgery. Aspirin may be an effective, safe, convenient, and cheap alternative for prevention of VTE. Further large randomized studies are required to confirm these findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02274-z.

Comparable efficacy of 100 mg aspirin twice daily and rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Background:

Aspirin has demonstrated safety and efficacy for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, inconsistent dose regimens have been reported in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of 100 mg aspirin twice daily with rivaroxaban in VTE prophylaxis following THA.

Methods:

Patients undergoing elective unilateral primary THA between January 2019 and January 2020 were prospectively enrolled in the study and randomly allocated to receive 5 weeks of VTE prophylaxis with either oral enteric-coated aspirin (100 mg twice daily) or rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily). Medication safety and efficacy were comprehensively evaluated through symptomatic VTE incidence, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) on Doppler ultrasonography, total blood loss (TBL), laboratory bloodwork, Harris hip score (HHS), post-operative recovery, and the incidence of other complications.

Results:

We included 70 patients in this study; 34 and 36 were allocated to receive aspirin and rivaroxaban prophylaxis, respectively. No cases of symptomatic VTE occurred in this study. The DVT rate on Doppler ultrasonography in the aspirin group was not significantly different from that in the rivaroxaban group (8.8% vs. 8.3%, χ² = 0.01, P = 0.91), confirming the non-inferiority of aspirin for DVT prophylaxis (χ² = 2.29, P = 0.01). The calculated TBL in the aspirin group (944.9 mL [658.5–1137.8 mL]) was similar to that in the rivaroxaban group (978.3 mL [747.4–1740.6mL]) (χ² = 1.55, P = 0.12). However, there were no significant inter-group differences in HHS at post-operative day (POD) 30 (Aspirin: 81.0 [78.8–83.0], Rivaroxaban: 81.0 [79.3–83.0], χ² = 0.43, P = 0.67) and POD 90 (Aspirin: 90.0 [89.0–92.0], Rivaroxaban: 91.5 [88.3–92.8], χ² = 0.77, P = 0.44), the incidence of bleeding events (2.9% vs. 8.3%, χ² = 0.96, P = 0.33), or gastrointestinal complications (2.9% vs. 5.6%, χ² = 1.13, P = 0.29).

Conclusion:

In terms of safety and efficacy, the prophylactic use of 100 mg aspirin twice daily was not statistically different from that of rivaroxaban in preventing VTE and reducing the risk of blood loss following elective primary THA. This supports the use of aspirin chemoprophylaxis following THA as a less expensive and more widely available option for future THAs.

Trial Registration:

Chictr.org, ChiCTR18000202894; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=33284

A comparison of aspirin against rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after hip or knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients are at an elevated risk of post-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE). Newer thromboprophylactic agents such as rivaroxaban are increasingly used and effective in preventing thromboembolic events but may worsen bleeding risk. Recent studies have suggested that the more cost-effective aspirin may also be effective in preventing VTE. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of aspirin against rivaroxaban for the prevention of VTE following TKA and THA.

METHODS

Electronic searches were performed using five databases from their date of inception to August 2018. Relevant studies were identified, with data extracted and meta-analyzed from the studies.

RESULTS

Five studies were included, which consisted of 2257 in the aspirin group and 2337 in the rivaroxaban group. There were no differences between aspirin and rivaroxaban for either VTE (p = 0.48) or its components deep vein thrombosis (p = 0.44) and pulmonary embolism (p = 0.98). Also, there were no differences between groups for either major bleeding (p = 0.17), any bleeding (p = 0.62), readmissions (p = 0.37) or wound complications (p = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

Aspirin was not significantly different to rivaroxaban for prevention of VTE or adverse events after TKA or THA. However, this study was limited by the significant heterogeneity of the included studies. More large randomized studies are needed to add to this body of evidence.

Is continuation of anti-platelet treatment safe for elective total hip arthroplasty patients?

INTRODUCTION

Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) is a commonly prescribed medication, especially in the age group of individuals who undergo elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). Preoperative discontinuation of aspirin is believed to reduce intraoperative bleeding and other complications, but it may increase the risk of perioperative cardiovascular events. In this study we have sought to evaluate the safety of continuous aspirin treatment in patients undergoing elective THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of a consecutive cohort who underwent elective THA in a tertiary medical center between 2011 and 2018. The cohort was divided into two groups-one that received continuous preoperative aspirin treatment and one that did not. Blood loss, peri- and postoperative complications, readmissions, and short- and long-term mortality were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Out of 757 consecutive patients (293 males, 464 females) who underwent elective primary THA, 552 were in the "non-aspirin" group and 205 were in the "aspirin" group and were not treated preoperative with other medication affecting hemostasis. Perioperative continuation of aspirin treatment did not significantly increase perioperative bleeding, as indicated by changes in hemoglobin levels (P = 0.72). There were no significant differences in short- and long-term mortality (P = 0.47 and P = 0.4, respectively) or other perioperative complications, such as readmission (P = 0.78), deep or superficial infection (P = 1 and P = 0.47, respectively), and cardiovascular events (none in both groups).

CONCLUSION

Peri-operative continuation of aspirin treatment in patients undergoing elective primary THA did not increase perioperative complications or mortality compared to the non-aspirin-treated patients. The protective effects of aspirin from postoperative thrombotic and cardiovascular events are well documented. The current findings dispute the need to preoperatively withhold aspirin treatment in patients undergoing elective primary THA.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing knee replacements: comparison of real-world outcomes

Background Increasing evidence for the use of the aspirin in patients undergoing an orthopaedic surgery for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis has led to a change in the national guidelines substituting anticoagulants with aspirin. Little is known about the impact of such substitution on real-world outcomes from clinical practice. Objective The study was designed to examine clinical outcomes associated with the use of aspirin and apixaban. Setting Two large-scale general hospitals in West Yorkshire region of England. Method A 1-year observational study among adults who underwent elective knee replacements and received venous thromboembolism prophylaxis within the first 14 days post replacements. Main outcome measure The incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism, leaking wounds during the hospital stay, and 30-day any readmission for the two drugs. Results A total of 420 patients were included. There was a significant drop in apixaban prescribing (from 80.37 to 10.51%) and increase in aspirin use (from 19.02 to 81.71%) after the implementation of the revised guidelines. There were 52 (12.38%) cases of leaking wound, 16 (3.81%) cases of postoperative venous thromboembolism, 45 (10.71%) cases of 30-day readmission and no case of 30-day major bleeding. The leaking wounds and 30-day readmissions were almost twice more frequent in obese compared to non-obese patients. Multivariate logistic regression found an increased risk of leaking wound with apixaban and postoperative venous thromboembolism and 30-day readmission with aspirin use but the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion The results suggest aspirin to be as effective as apixaban in preventing venous thromboembolism and readmission. Apixaban usage decreased with a corresponding increase in Aspirin use. The impact of obesity and length of hospital stay need further investigations.

Effect of 3 different anticoagulants on hidden blood loss during total hip arthroplasty after tranexamic acid

Comparison of different anticoagulants in blood management and complications with tranexamic acid (TXA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is unclear. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety among receiving nadroparin calcium, enoxaparin sodium or rivaroxaban after TXA in THA.150 patients undergoing primary unilateral THA were received 15 mg/kg intravenous TXA (IV-TXA) before skin incision, followed by 1 of nadroparin calcium (Group A), enoxaparin sodium (Group B), or rivaroxaban (Group C) randomly during hospitalization. The primary outcome was hidden blood loss (HBL). Other outcomes such as the maximum hemoglobin (Hb) drop, total blood loss (TBL), the volume of drainage, transfusion rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), and complications were also compared.There were no statistically significant differences in HBL, the maximum hemoglobin (Hb) drop, transfusion rate, and complications among 3 groups. LOS was significantly higher for patients in Group B than Group A (P = .026). Neither deep venous thrombosis (DVT) nor pulmonary embolism (PE) occurred in any group.There were no differences in efficacy and safety in patients undergoing THA receiving nadroparin calcium, enoxaparin sodium, or rivaroxaban after anti-fibrinolysis with TXA.

Peri-operative blood transfusion in elective major surgery: incidence, indications and outcome - an observational multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Patients' demographic and epidemiological characteristics, local variations in clinicians' knowledge and experience and types of surgery can influence peri-operative transfusion practices. Sharing data on transfusion practices and recipients may improve patients' care and implementation of Patient Blood Management (PBM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicentre, prospective, observational, cross-sectional study that included 61 centres. Clinical and transfusion data of patients undergoing major elective surgery were collected; transfusion predictors and patients' outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

Of 6,121 patients, 1,579 (25.8%) received a peri-operative transfusion. A total of 5,812 blood components were transfused: red blood cells (RBC), fresh-frozen plasma and platelets in 1,425 (23.3%), 762 (12.4%) and 88 (1.4%) cases, respectively). Pre-operative anaemia was identified in 2,019 (33%) patients. Half of the RBC units were used by patients in the age group 45-69 years. Specific procedures with the highest RBC use were coronary artery bypass grafting (16.9% of all units) and hip arthroplasty (14.9%). Low haemoglobin concentration was the most common indication for intra-operative RBC transfusion (57%) and plasma and platelet transfusions were mostly initiated for acute bleeding (61.3% and 61.1%, respectively). The RBC transfusion rate in study centres varied from 2% to 72%. RBC transfusion was inappropriate in 99% (n=150/151) of pre-operative, 23% (n=211/926) of intra-operative and 43% (n=308/716) of post-operative RBC transfusion episodes. Pre-operative haemoglobin, increased blood loss, open surgery and duration of surgery were the main independent predictors of intra-operative RBC transfusion. Low pre-operative haemoglobin concentration was independently associated with post-operative pulmonary complications.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings identified areas for improvement in peri-operative transfusion practice and PBM implementation in Turkey.

Risk of Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding With New vs Conventional Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is controversy over whether use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) associates with increased risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) compared with conventional therapies (such as vitamin K antagonists or anti-platelet agents). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled trials and high-quality real-world studies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov Website databases (through Oct 12, 2018) for randomized controlled trials and high-quality real-world studies that reported major GIB events in patients given NOACs or conventional therapy. Relative risks (RRs) for randomized controlled trials and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for real-world studies were calculated separately using random-effects models.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 43 randomized controlled trials (183,752 patients) and 41 real-world studies (1,879,428 patients). The pooled major rates of GIB for patients on NOACs (1.19%) vs conventional treatment (0.92%) did not differ significantly (RR from randomized controlled trials, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.91-1.31 and aHR from real-world studies, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94-1.10; P_interaction=.52). Rivaroxaban, but not other NOACs, was associated with an increased risk for major GIB (RR from randomized controlled trials, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.17-1.65 and aHR from real-world studies, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.23; P_interaction = .06). Analyses of subgroups, such as patients with different indications, dosage, or follow-up time, did not significantly affect results. Meta-regression analysis failed to detect any potential confounding to impact the primacy outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled trials and real-world studies, we confirmed that there is no significant difference in risk of major GIB between patients receiving NOACs vs conventional treatment. Rivaroxaban users had a 39% increase in risk for major GIB.

Systematic review of prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after knee arthroplasty: enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban

Total knee arthroplasty is an elective procedure performed on relatively healthy individuals. However, due to the inherent risk of venous thromboembolism, drugs are used for its prophylaxis. The objective of the present study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to compare the efficacy of enoxaparin and rivaroxaban in preventing this complication and the risk of intraoperative bleeding. We reviewed the SciELO, Pubmed and Cochrane databases with the descriptors knee arthroplasty, rivaroxaban and enoxaparin through the PICO search strategy. Inclusion criteria were the articles during the study period comparing both drugs in knee arthroplasty. Relevant criteria to study eligibility were articles published since 2010 and with a sample of more than 20 patients; studies obtained in their entirety; and studies with follow-up of more than 12 months. The variables used to compare the articles were the most common postoperative complications of knee arthroplasties: venous thromboembolism and bleeding. We used the Review Man software, version 5.3, for structuring the review. In the studies analyzed, considering symptomatic venous thromboembolism, rivaroxaban resulted in higher benefits when compared to enoxaparin.