Impact of intraoperative femoral fractures in primary hip arthroplasty: a comparative study with a mid-term follow-up

What's New in Periprosthetic Femur Fractures?

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femur fracture (PFF) is one of the most common indications for reoperation following total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS/RESULTS

This article provides a review of a symposium on PFF that was presented at the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons 2023 annual meeting, including an overview of the Vancouver classification and its implications on treatment and subsequent complications, an updated approach to the management of intraoperative fractures, and finally, contemporary strategies for both osteosynthesis as well as revision arthroplasty for PFFs.

CONCLUSION

As the incidence of PPF continues to increase, arthroplasty and trauma surgeons must be prepared to address this challenging complication with a contemporary understanding of the treatment options and their outcomes.

Three Differing Methods of Treating Intraoperative Nondisplaced Calcar Fractures Demonstrate Similar Radiographic Stem Subsidence

BACKGROUND

Several management strategies have been described to treat intraoperative calcar fractures during total hip arthroplasty (THA), including retaining the primary implant and utilizing cerclage cables (CCs) or switching the implant to one that bypasses the fracture and achieves diaphyseal fixation. However, the radiographic and clinical outcomes of these differing strategies have never been described and compared.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 50 patients who sustained an intraoperative calcar fracture out of 9,129 primary total hip arthroplasties (0.55%) performed by one of three surgeons between 2008 and 2022. Each of the three surgeons consistently employed a distinct strategy for the management of these fractures: retention of the primary metaphyseal-engaging implant and placement of CCs; exchange to a modular, tapered-fluted stem (MTF); or exchange to a fully-coated, diaphyseal-engaging stem (FC). Stem subsidence was then evaluated on standing anteroposterior pelvis radiographs at three months and one year postoperatively. Postoperative medical and surgical complication rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of fifteen patients were treated with CC, 15 with MTF, and 20 with FC. At three-month follow-up, mean stem subsidence was 0.43 ± 0.08 mm, 1.47 ± 0.36 mm, and 0.68 ± 0.39 mm for CC, MTF, and FC cohorts, respectively (P = .323). At one-year, mean stem subsidence was 0.70 ± 0.08 mm, 1.74 ± 0.69 mm, and 1.88 ± 0.90 mm for the CC, MTF, and FC cohorts, respectively (P = .485). Medical complications included 2 venous thromboembolic events (4%) within 90 days of surgery. There were 6 reoperations (12%); 3 (6%) for acute periprosthetic joint infection (all within the FC cohort); 2 (4%) for postoperative periprosthetic fractures (one fracture distal to the stem in the FC cohort and one fracture at the level of the stem in the MTF cohort), and 1 (2%) closed reduction for instability (within the CC cohort).

CONCLUSIONS

The three described methods of managing intraoperative nondisplaced calcar fractures demonstrated little radiographic stem subsidence; however, the risk of reoperation was much higher than expected.

Impact of Intraoperative Femoral Fractures During Cemented Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures

BACKGROUND

There have been several studies on intraoperative femoral fractures (IFFs) during primary total hip arthroplasty, but it is not well understood how this complication affects the patient population undergoing cemented hemiarthroplasty. This study aimed to analyze the impact of IFFs sustained during cemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who were treated for Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association 31B fractures with cemented hemiarthroplasty between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2021, at a single academic level 1 trauma center. An initial cohort was constructed of all patients who sustained an IFF during their surgery, yielding 31 patients after excluding those who sustained a pathologic fracture or had incomplete data. These patients were matched 1:2 on age, sex, and body mass index to patients in a control cohort. The primary outcome measure was implant failure. Secondary outcome measures included complications, all-cause mortality, and radiographic outcomes (subsidence, femoral component loosening, acetabular wear, and heterotopic ossification) postoperatively.

RESULTS

Subsequent implant revision was required in 3.2% (n = 1) of patients who sustained an IFF and 1.6% (n = 1) of patients who did not. After adjusting for comorbidities, there was no observed excess risk of implant failure in the fracture cohort when compared to the control cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.30, P = 0.740). There was no observed excess risk of morbidity (HR = 0.69, P = 0.621) or all-cause mortality (HR = 0.23, P = 0.330). Radiographic outcomes also did not significantly differ between the 2 cohorts (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative fractures during cemented hemiarthroplasty do not contribute to an increased risk of secondary surgery, morbidity, or mortality after surgery. They also do not adversely affect radiographic outcomes postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fracture - When is the Cerclage Enough?

BACKGROUND AND PLANNING

Intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures are among the most serious complications in both primary and revision arthroplasty. They are often not detected, despite intraoperative radiological control. Since an unnoticed intraoperative fracture often requires revision surgery, which has been associated with increased mortality rates, intraoperative diagnosis and corresponding direct and sufficient treatment are crucial. There are patient-, surgery-, and implant-specific risk factors that increase the possibilities of intraoperative fractures. The most common risk factors on the patient side are age, gender, and various pre-existing conditions, such as osteoporosis or rheumatic diseases. A minimally invasive approach and a cementless press-fit fixation are the most significant surgery- and implant-specific risk factors. The Vancouver classification or the modified Mallory classification are available for the classification of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures. Based on these classifications, treatment recommendations can be derived. Different strategies are available for fracture management.

THERAPY

Generally, if the stem is stable, osteosynthesis can be performed with preservation of the implant. This procedure can be applied to the majority of cases with non-displaced fractures by using cerclages as fixation. An unstable implant may require replacement of the stem. In higher grade fractures, stabilisation by using plate osteosynthesis may be necessary. The aim is to achieve the most anatomical reposition possible for the best possible bony consolidation. The ultimate goal is high implant stability and restoration of the biomechanics.

[Tips and tricks of cement removal in the case of revision surgery]

BACKGROUND

In Germany, current revision rates after arthroplasty range between 28-37%. In particular, remaining cement residues are causative for additional revision surgery after periprosthetic joint infection, which is why complete cement removal is of high importance. However, the removal of remaining cement residues often confronts the surgeon with technical challenges. Complication-free and complete cement removal requires extensive preoperative preparation in order to develop the best possible surgical strategy.

TREATMENT

Special instrument sets to facilitate cement removal in revision cases are available from various manufacturers. In addition to endoluminal approaches, access enhancements such as extended osteotomies exist to facilitate complete cement removal. Finally, the surgeon should be able to give the indication for an intraoperative procedural change after a defined time interval.

Detection of periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem by resonance frequency analysis: An in vitro study

Periprosthetic femoral bone fractures are frequent complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and may occur during the insertion of uncemented Femoral Stems (FS), due to the nature of the press-fit fixation. Such fracture may lead to the surgical failure of the THA and require a revision surgery, which may have dramatic consequences. Therefore, an early detection of intra-operative fractures is important to avoid worsening the fracture and/or to enable a peroperative treatment. The aim of this in vitro study is to determine the sensitivity of a method based on resonance frequency analysis of the bone-stem-ancillary system for periprosthetic fractures detection. A periprosthetic fracture was artificially created close to the lesser-trochanter of 10 femoral bone mimicking phantoms. The bone-stem-ancillary resonance frequencies in the range (2-12) kHz were measured on an ancillary instrumented with piezoelectric sensors, which was fixed to the femoral stem. The measurements were repeated for different fracture lengths from 4 to 55 mm. The results show a decrease of the resonance frequencies due to the fracture occurrence and propagation. The frequency shift reached up to 170 Hz. The minimum fracture length that can be detected varies from 3.1±1.7 mm to 5.9±1.9 mm according to the mode and to the specimen. A significantly higher sensitivity (p = 0.011) was obtained for a resonance frequency around 10.6 kHz, corresponding to a mode vibrating in a plane perpendicular to the fracture. This study opens new paths toward the development of non-invasive vibration-based methods for intra-operative periprosthetic fractures detection.

Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up of Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Collarless Triple-Tapered Polished Cemented Stem With Line-to-Line Implantation Using a Direct Anterior Approach

BACKGROUND

The Trilliance stem (B. Braun-Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany), a novel collarless triple-tapered polished stem, was introduced in 2009. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiological results of the Trilliance stem with line-to-line implantation in primary total hip arthroplasty using a direct anterior approach.

METHODS

A consecutive retrospective series of 130 patients (151 hips) who underwent total hip arthroplasty between February 2009 and August 2011 were evaluated for a minimum of 10 years. Of these, 87.4% had a diagnosis of secondary osteoarthritis based on developmental hip dysplasia. Clinical and radiological results, complications were evaluated and survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 10.7 years (range, 10.0-12.1). Thirteen hips (13 patients, 6.8%) were lost to follow-up. Adequate cementation (Barrack grade A) was achieved in 136 hips (93.8%) 1 week post-operatively. Nearly all (144 hips, 99.3%) had been inserted within the range of 3°. No significant differences were identified between high- (≥30 procedures/year) and low- (<30 procedures/year) volume surgeons. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with revision of the femoral component for aseptic loosening, revision of the femoral component for any reason and revision of either component for any reason as the end points, cumulative survivorship was 100.0%, 97.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 95.4-100.0) and 96.5% (95% CI 93.8-99.3) at 10 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Trilliance stem with line-to-line implantation using a direct anterior approach has an excellent clinical and radiological outcome at a minimum of 10 years' follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Retrospective cohort study.

Use of a Gigli Saw as a Substitute Osteotomy Tool When Oscillating Saw Malfunctions Occur During Hip Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

The oscillating saw has some inherent disadvantages, such as notch formation and blood splash. The objective is to introduce the Gigli saw as a substitute osteotomy tool when oscillating saw malfunctions occur during surgery.

METHODS

During our retrospective study, 120 patients (120 hips) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of femoral neck fracture, femoral head necrosis, developmental hip dysplasia (Crowe I), or primary osteoarthritis between October 2017 and April 2020 at our institute were included. Sixty patients (26 men and 34 women) with a mean age of 67.3 years (±15.1 years) underwent femoral neck osteotomy using a Gigli saw. The other 60 patients (32 men and 28 women) with a mean age of 64.4 years (±18.8 years) underwent femoral neck osteotomy using an oscillating saw. Intraoperative evaluations, including osteotomy time, osteotomy height, number of notch formations, and blood splash generation, were performed. Routine anteroposterior views of the pelvis and proximal femur were obtained for all patients after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean osteotomy times were 26.60 ± 14.80 s and 31.80 ± 14.20 s with the oscillating saw and Gigli saw, respectively (t = 1.964, P = 0.0519). The mean osteotomy heights were 1.26 ± 0.22 cm and 1.20 ± 0.14 cm with the oscillating saw and Gigli saw, respectively (t = 1.782, P = 0.0773). The use of a Gigli saw did not result in bone notch formation or blood splash generation when multiple blood splashes were generated in the oscillating saw group. Postoperative radiographs showed no prostheses malposition in the Gigli saw and oscillating saw groups.

CONCLUSION

The Gigli saw has various advantages and can be a substitute tool for femoral neck osteotomy during THA when oscillating saw malfunctions occur.

The influence of calcar collar and surface finish in the cemented femoral component on the incidence of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture at a minimum of five years after primary total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Cemented femoral component design including its mechanical behavior in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has influenced the occurrence of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF). The main aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the calcar collar and surface finish in the cemented femoral component on the risk of PPFF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective review was undertaken of 1082 primary THAs in 912 patients using cemented femoral components followed for a minimum of five years (mean, 9.4 years; range, 5-24 years). The incidence of PPFF, patients' demographics and surgical details were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed for four different outcomes: any PPFF, revision of the femoral component for PPFF, aseptic loosening, and for any reason.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of PPFFs was 1.0% (n = 11): 1.4% (n = 10) in the collarless polished (CLP) group, none in the collared polished (CP) group and 0.6% (n = 1) in the collared non-polished (CNP) group (p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the femoral component at 12 years with PPFF as the end point was 97.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.9 to 99.8) in the collarless group and 99.7% (95% CI, 99.1 to 100) in the collared group (p = 0.048). With revision of the femoral component for aseptic loosening as the end point, survivorship was 100.0% in the CLP and CP groups, and 98.1% (95% CI, 95.9 to 100) in the CNP group (CLP vs CP, p > 0.999; CLP vs CNP, p = 0.001; CP vs CNP, p = 0.112).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the calcar collar in the cemented femoral component could play an important role to reduce the incidence of PPFF. The surface finish in the cemented femoral components influenced the incidence of femoral component revision for aseptic loosening over 5-12 years. Surgeons should consider not only the geometry and the mechanical function of the femoral components based on different design philosophies, but also potential complications associated with different designs that may require revision arthroplasty.

The Impact of Femoral Component Cementation on Fracture and Mortality Risk in Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty: Analysis from a National Medicare Sample

BACKGROUND

Complications following elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) are rare but potentially devastating. The impact of femoral component cementation on the risk of periprosthetic femoral fractures and early perioperative death has not been studied in a nationally representative population in the United States.

METHODS

Elective primary THAs performed with or without cement among elderly patients were identified from Medicare claims from 2017 to 2018. We performed separate nested case-control analyses matched 1:2 on age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, payment model, census division of facility, and exposure time and compared fixation mode between (1) groups with and without 90-day periprosthetic femoral fracture and (2) groups with and without 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 118,675 THAs were included. The 90-day periprosthetic femoral fracture rate was 2.0%, and the 30-day mortality rate was 0.18%. Cases were successfully matched. The risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture was significantly lower among female patients with cement fixation compared with matched controls with cementless fixation (OR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.00; p = 0.05); this finding was not evident among male patients (p = 0.94). In contrast, the 30-day mortality risk was higher among male patients with cement fixation compared with matched controls with cementless fixation (OR = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.87; p = 0.02). The association between cement usage and mortality among female patients almost reached significance (OR = 1.74; 95% CI, 0.98 to 3.11; p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly patients managed with THA, cemented stems were associated with lower rates of periprosthetic femoral fracture among female patients but not male patients. The association between cemented stems and higher rates of 30-day mortality was significant for male patients and almost reached significance for female patients, although the absolute rates of mortality were very low. For surgeons who can competently perform THA with cement, our data support the use of a cemented stem to avoid periprosthetic femoral fracture in elderly female patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fixation of intraoperative proximal femoral fractures during THA using two versus three cerclage wires - a biomechanical study

Background

Intraoperative proximal femoral fractures (IPFF) are relevant complications during total hip arthroplasty. Fixation using cerclage wires (CW) represents a minimally-invasive technique to address these fractures through the same surgical approach. The goal of treatment is to mobilise the patient as early as possible, which requires high primary stability. This study aimed to compare different cerclage wire configurations fixing IPFF with regard to biomechanical primary stability.

Methods

Standardised IPFF (type II, Modified Mallory Classification) were created in human fresh frozen femora and were fixed either by two or three CW (1.6 mm, stainless steel). All cadaveric specimens (n = 42) were randomised to different groups (quasi-static, dynamic) or subgroups (2 CW, 3 CW) stratified by bone mineral density determined by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry. Using a biomechanical testing setup, quasi-static and dynamic cyclic failure tests were carried out. Cyclic loading started from 200 N to 500 N at 1 Hz with increasing peak load by 250 N every 100 cycles until failure occurred or maximum load (5250 N) reached. The change of fracture gap size was optically captured.

Results

No significant differences in failure load after quasi-static (p = 0.701) or dynamic cyclic loading (p = 0.132) were found between the experimental groups. In the quasi-static load testing, all constructs resisted 250% of the body weight (BW) of their corresponding body donor. In the dynamic cyclic load testing, all but one construct (treated by 3 CW) resisted 250% BW.

Conclusions

Based on this in vitro data, both two and three CW provided sufficient primary stability according to the predefined minimum failure load (250% BW) to resist. The authors recommend the treatment using two CW because it reduces the risk of vascular injury and shortens procedure time.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04956-5.

Diagnosis and Management of Intraoperative Fractures in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures are challenging complications that may affect implant stability and survivorship. Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are uncommon and infrequently are the focus of studies. Acetabular fractures are occasionally recognized after patients report unremitting groin pain weeks postoperatively. The widespread use of cementless acetabular cups might lead to higher number of fractures than is clinically detectable. Conversely, the incidence of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures are more common and encompass a broad spectrum, ranging from a small cortical perforation to displaced fractures with an unstable prosthesis. Appropriate recognition, including mindfulness of preoperative patient and surgical risk factors, is critical to the successful management of acetabular and femoral complications. This comprehensive review article focuses on the incidence, patient and surgical risk factors, diagnosis, management, and clinical outcomes associated with intraoperative acetabular and femur fractures in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Intraoperative complications in total hip arthroplasty using a new cementless femoral implant (SP-CL®)

BACKGROUND

Considering the excellent results already achieved in total hip arthroplasty (THA), new implants must be at least as safe as currently used implants and lead to longer survival. A new cementless femoral stem, SP-CL^®, has been introduced. The aim of this study is to evaluate intraoperative complications and assess the risk factors of THA with the SP-CL^® implant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All THA patients who were operated on using the SP-CL^® (LINK, Hamburg, Germany) implant between 2015 and 2018 were included in the analysis. Data were collected from medical records from national and hospital electronic databases. Radiological measurements were made from standard pre- and postoperative radiographs.

RESULTS

A total of 222 THA were performed using the SP-CL^® implant. The average age of the patients was 56 years (14-77 years). There were 1 transient sciatic nerve injury, 1 acetabular fracture, and 11 (5.0%) intraoperative femoral fractures (IFF), of which 7 were treated with cerclage wire or titanium band during the operation while the other fractures were treated conservatively. None of the IFF patients were revised due to fracture during the follow-up period (one revision due to infection). The radiographic morphology of proximal femur was associated with increased risk of IFF (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study demonstrate a 5% incidence of IFF when using the LINK SP-CL^® femoral stem in THA. The radiographic morphology of the proximal femur was an important predictor of IFF and should be assessed when using SP-CL^®.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.