1
|
Murea M, Woo K. New Frontiers in Vascular Access Practice: From Standardized to Patient-tailored Care and Shared Decision Making. KIDNEY360 2021; 2:1380-1389. [PMID: 35369664 PMCID: PMC8676387 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0002882021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Vascular access planning is critical in the management of patients with advanced kidney disease who elect for hemodialysis for RRT. Policies put in place more than two decades ago attempted to standardize vascular access care around the model of optimal, namely arteriovenous fistula, and least preferred, namely central venous catheter, type of access. This homogenized approach to vascular access care emerged ineffective in the increasingly heterogeneous and complex dialysis population. The most recent vascular access guidelines acknowledge the limitations of standardized care and encourage tailoring vascular access care on the basis of patient and disease characteristics. In this article, we discuss available literature in support of patient-tailored access care on the basis of differences in vascular access outcomes by biologic and social factors-age, sex, and race. Further, we draw attention to the overlooked dimension of patient-reported preferences and shared decision making in the practice of vascular access planning. We discuss milestones to overcome as requisite steps to implement effective shared decision making in vascular access care. Finally, we take into consideration local practice cofactors as major players in vascular access fate. We conclude that a personalized approach to hemodialysis vascular access will require dynamic care specifically relevant to the individual on the basis of biologic factors, fluctuating clinical needs, values, and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Murea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Karen Woo
- Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prenestini A, Sartirana M, Lega F. Involving clinicians in management: assessing views of doctors and nurses on hybrid professionalism in clinical directorates. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:350. [PMID: 33858410 PMCID: PMC8047525 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06352-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hybrid professionalism is one of the most effective ways to involve clinicians in management practices and responsibilities. With this study we investigated the perceptions of doctors and nurses on hybridization in clinical directorates (CDs) in hospitals. METHODS We investigated the attitudes of healthcare professionals (doctors and nurses) towards eight hospital CDs in the Local Health Authority (LHA) of Bologna (Emilia Romagna, Italy) 6 years after their implementation. We used a validated questionnaire by Braithwaite and Westbrook (2004). Drawing on Palmer et al. (2007), we added a section about the characteristics of department heads. In all, 123 healthcare professionals in managerial roles completed and returned the questionnaire. The return rate was 47.4% for doctors and 31.6% for nurses. RESULTS Doctors reported an increase in clinical governance, interdisciplinarity collaboration, and standardization of clinical work. Hybridization of practices was noted to have taken place. While doctors did not see these changes as a threat to professional values, they felt that hospital managers had taken greater control. There was a large overlap of attitudes between doctors and nurses: inter-professional integration in CDs fostered alignment of values and aims. The polarity index was higher for responses from the doctors than from the nurses. CONCLUSION The study findings have implications for policy makers and managers: mission and strategic mandate of CDs; governance of CDs, leadership issues; opportunities for engaging healthcare professionals; changes in managerial involvement during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also discuss the limitations of the present study and future areas for research into hybrid structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Prenestini
- Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods (DEMM) and Center of Research and Advanced Education in Health Administration (CRC HEAD), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Marco Sartirana
- Centre for Research on Healthcare and Social Management (CeRGAS) and SDA Bocconi Government, Health and Not for Profit division, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Lega
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health (SCIBIS) and Center of Research and Advanced Education in Health Administration (CRC HEAD), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.,Center for Applied Research in Health Economics, Organization and Management, IRCCS Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akhtar M, Irfan A. Exploring clinical research efficacy of teaching and practicing medical professionals in Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci 2021; 37:851-857. [PMID: 34104177 PMCID: PMC8155441 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.37.3.2395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The current study aimed to explore clinical research efficacy of teaching and practicing medical professionals in Pakistan. The role of socio-demographic factors in this context was also investigated. Methods This study using cross-sectional research design was carried out from August to December 2019. A sample of teaching and practicing medical professionals (N=96) was collected through purposive sampling from Islamabad and Rawalpindi. Clinical Research Appraisal Inventory (CRAI) was used along with the demographic datasheet. Research data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS-21). Results The results of the study revealed that teaching and practicing medical professionals feel most competent in 'collaborating with others' while the research area in which they feel least competent is 'securing funds for a study'. It was found that there are significant differences in the research efficacy of teaching and practicing medical professionals with reference to age (p< 0.00), gender (p< 0.01), designation (p< 0.00), number of articles published (p< 0.00), number of articles under review (p< 0.03), number of articles submitted (p< 0.03), and number of funded projects completed (p< 0.02). Satisfaction with salary and number of hours at work per week have no impact on their research efficacy. Conclusions Findings have implications for policy makers and medical institutions to promote research skills in teaching and practicing medical professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mubeen Akhtar
- Mubeen Akhtar, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Park Road, Tarlai Kalan, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Aiman Irfan
- Aiman Irfan, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Park Road, Tarlai Kalan, Islamabad, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Porter J, Wilton A. Professional identity of allied health staff associated with a major health network organizational restructuring. Nurs Health Sci 2020; 22:1103-1110. [PMID: 32951294 DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Maintenance of professional identity, particularly during periods of organizational restructuring, is critical within modern complex healthcare systems as professional identity contributes to the psychological well-being of staff and leaders. This study aimed to evaluate change in professional identity of allied health staff associated with a major health network organizational restructuring in Australia. Data were collected from allied health staff in 2017 and 2019, before (n = 226) and after (n = 197) the restructuring. An online questionnaire including the 10-question Brown's Group Identification Scale that considers the strength of professional identity of the individual with their own professional group was used. Professional identity of allied health staff was high before and after the organizational restructuring, although several individual statements, and overall professional identity, declined significantly post-restructuring. It was difficult to attribute these changes solely to the restructuring due to some differences in demographic characteristics between the two cohorts. Future studies should seek to understand the effect of other workplace factors on the professional identity of allied health staff. Further research could also investigate allied health professional identity to understand its importance within contemporary healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judi Porter
- Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.,Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Geelong, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Steenbruggen RA, van Oorsouw R, Maas M, Hoogeboom TJ, Brand P, Wees PVD. Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open Qual 2020; 9:bmjoq-2019-000812. [PMID: 32576577 PMCID: PMC7312452 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background International hospital accreditation instruments, such as Joint Commission International (JCI) and Qmentum, focus mainly on hospital policy and procedures and do not specifically cover a profession such as hospital-based physiotherapy. This justifies the need for a quality system to which hospital-based physiotherapy can better identify, based on a common framework of quality indicators for effective quality management. Objective This study aimed to identify the most important quality indicators of a hospital-based physiotherapy department in the eyes of hospital-based physiotherapists and their managers. Methods Based on input from three focus groups and a structured literature review, a first set of quality indicators for hospital physiotherapy was assembled. After checking this set for duplicates and for overlap with JCI and Qmentum, it formed the starting point of a modified Delphi procedure. In two rounds, 17 hospital-based physiotherapy experts rated the quality indicators on relevance through online surveys. In a final consensus meeting, quality indicators were established, classified in quality themes and operationalised by describing for each theme the rationale, specifications, domain and type of indicator. Results Three focus groups provided 120 potential indicators, which were complemented with 18 potential indicators based on literature. After duplicate and overlap check and the Delphi procedure, these 138 potential indicators were reduced to a set of 56 quality indicators for hospital-based physiotherapy. Finally, these 56 indicators were condensed into 7 composite indicators, each representing a quality theme based on definitions of the European Foundation for Quality Management. Conclusion A set of 56 quality indicators, condensed into 7 composite indicators each representing a quality theme, was developed to assess the quality of a hospital-based physiotherapy department.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rudi A Steenbruggen
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- School of Health, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marjo Maas
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Institute of Allied Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas J Hoogeboom
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Brand
- Medical Education, Isala Hospitals, Zwolle, The Netherlands
- Clinical Education, UMCG, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Philip van der Wees
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grosser J, Bientzle M, Kimmerle J. A Literature Review on the Foundations and Potentials of Digital Teaching Scenarios for Interprofessional Health Care Education. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E3410. [PMID: 32422876 PMCID: PMC7277820 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
The health care system is increasingly complex and specialized, but it presents the actors involved with the challenge of working together in interprofessional teams. One way to meet this challenge is through interprofessional training approaches, where representatives of different professions learn together with learners of other professions. This article contributes to the question of how interprofessional teaching in health care education can be designed with a low threshold by using digital media. We focus on learning with digital learning platforms and learning with videos. Based on existing empirical findings, these approaches are discussed in terms of their potential and limitations for interprofessional teaching. In particular, we examine how these approaches influence the core competence domains of interprofessional collaborative practice. Digital collaborative learning platforms are suitable for teaching interprofessional competences, since they enable social and professional exchange among learners of different professions. Videos are suitable for imparting medical declarative and procedural knowledge. Based on these considerations, the use of videos in combination with interaction possibilities is presented as a didactic approach that can combine the aspect of knowledge transfer with the possibility of interprofessional computer-based collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Grosser
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (J.G.); (M.B.)
| | - Martina Bientzle
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (J.G.); (M.B.)
| | - Joachim Kimmerle
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (J.G.); (M.B.)
- Department for Psychology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mickan S, Dawber J, Hulcombe J. Realist evaluation of allied health management in Queensland: what works, in which contexts and why. AUST HEALTH REV 2019; 43:466-473. [DOI: 10.1071/ah17265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective
Allied health structures and leadership positions vary throughout Australia and New Zealand in their design and implementation. It is not clear which organisational factors support allied health leaders and professionals to enhance clinical outcomes. The aim of this project was to identify key organisational contexts and corresponding mechanisms that influenced effective outcomes for allied health professionals.
Methods
A qualitative realist evaluation was chosen to describe key aspects of allied health organisational structures, identify positive outcomes and describe how context and processes are operationalised to influence outcomes for the allied health workforce and the populations they serve.
Results
A purposive sample of nine allied health leaders, five executives and 49 allied health professionals were interviewed individually and in focus groups, representing nine Queensland Health services. Marked differences exist in the title and focus of senior allied health leaders’ roles. The use of a qualitative realist evaluation methodology enabled identification of the mechanisms that work to achieve effective and efficient outcomes, within specific contexts.
Conclusions
The initial middle range theory of allied health organisational structures in Queensland was supported and extended to better understand which contexts were important and which key mechanisms were activated to achieve effective outcomes. Executive allied health leadership roles enable allied health leaders to use their influence in organisational planning and decision-making to ensure allied health professionals deliver successful patient care services. Professional governance systems embed the management and support of the clinical workforce most efficiently within professional disciplines. With consistent data management systems, allied health professional staff can be integrated within clinical teams that provide high-quality care. Interprofessional learning opportunities can enhance collaborative teamwork and, when allied health professionals are supported to understand and use research, they can deliver positive patient and business outcomes for the health service.
What is known about the topic?
A collective allied health organisational structure encourages engagement of allied health professionals within healthcare organisations. Organisational structures commonly include management and leadership strategies and service delivery models. Allied health leaders in Queensland work across a range of senior management levels to ensure adequate resources for sufficient suitably skilled professional staff to meet patient needs.
What does this paper add?
Literature to date has described how allied health professionals operate within organisational structures. This paper examines key aspects of allied health management, governance and leadership, together with mechanisms that support allied health professionals to deliver effective clinical and business outcomes for their local community.
What are the implications for practitioners?
Health service executives and allied health leaders should consider supporting executive allied health leadership roles to influence strategic planning and decision-making, as well as to deliver outcomes that are important to the health service. When allied health leaders implement integrated professional and operational governance systems, executives described allied health professionals as influential in supporting team-based models of care that add value to the business and improve outcomes for patients. When allied health leaders use consistent data management, executives reinforced the benefit of aligning activity data with financial costs to monitor, recognise and reimburse appropriate clinical interventions for patients. When allied health leaders support allied health workforce capability through educational and research opportunities, clinicians can use research to inform their clinical practice.
Collapse
|
8
|
Yeh TL, Chen HH, Chiu HH, Chiu YH, Hwang LC, Wu SL. Morbidity associated with overweight and obesity in health personnel: a 10-year retrospective of hospital-based cohort study in Taiwan. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2019; 12:267-274. [PMID: 30881069 PMCID: PMC6410747 DOI: 10.2147/dmso.s193434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate morbidity associated with overweight and obesity in health personnel and compare the differences among work roles. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study examined measurements obtained during employee medical checkups between 2007 and 2016 in a Taiwan medical center. BMI was used to define overweight (≥24 and <27 kg/m2) and obesity (≥27 kg/m2). Morbidity refers to prevalence, period incidence proportion, and incidence rate. Multivariable Cox model was used to estimate the HRs and 95% CI of the incidence proportion across work roles. RESULTS Ten thousand six hundred fifty-one health personnel with 24,295 BMI measurements were recruited. Mean age was 33.4±10.7 years and 72.4% was female. In total, 1,992 (8.2%) health personnel were underweight, 13,568 (55.8%) had a normal BMI, 5,097 (21%) were overweight, and 3,638 (15%) were obese. Five thousand nine hundred one health personnel with 31,172 different interval-year arrangement combinations were obtained. The incidence proportion of overweight and obesity was 1,947 (6.2%) and 1,494 (4.8%), respectively. The incidence rate was 37/1,000 and 15/1,000 person-years, respectively. Compared with that in supporting staff, the HR of overweight in doctors, nurses, and allied health professionals was 0.93 (95% CI =0.73-1.18, P=0.553), 0.92 (95% CI =0.73-1.16, P=0.491), and 0.85 (95% CI =0.67-1.09, P=0.202), respectively. Similarly, the HR of obesity was 0.86 (95% CI =0.66-1.14, P=0.301), 0.89 (95% CI =0.67-1.18, P=0.430), and 0.84 (95% CI =0.63-1.13, P=0.248), respectively. CONCLUSION In health personnel, the prevalence of overweight and obesity was 21% and 15%, respectively. The incidence proportion was 6.2% and 4.8%, respectively. Morbidity across the four health work roles examined was not significantly different.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tzu-Lin Yeh
- Department of Family Medicine, Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu City, Taiwan
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Hao Chen
- Department of Family Medicine, Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu City, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Hui Chiu
- Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hua Chiu
- Occupational Safety and Health Office, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Lee-Ching Hwang
- Department of Family Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shang-Liang Wu
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, QLD, Australia,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Petit dit Dariel O, Cristofalo P. A meta-ethnographic review of interprofessional teamwork in hospitals: what it is and why it doesn’t happen more often. J Health Serv Res Policy 2018; 23:272-279. [DOI: 10.1177/1355819618788384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Although interprofessional teamwork has been shown to improve patient safety, it is not yet routine practice in most hospital settings. There is also a lack of clarity regarding what teamwork actually means, with terms such as collaboration, coordination, networking and knotworking often being used interchangeably. In this study, we analyse 20 years of qualitative research on interprofessional teamwork in hospital settings and examine what it looks like and the factors influencing it. Methods The literature search included articles published between 1996 and 2016, and articles were included if they examined interprofessional teamwork within a hospital using qualitative methodology. We used meta-ethnographic analysis of eligible primary studies applying reciprocal translation and line of argument synthesis. Results Nineteen articles were included. Interprofessional teamwork was largely absent in acute care and found to be influenced by systems perpetuating power imbalances, organizational practices that interfered with interprofessional interactions, representations of teamwork and leadership. Conclusions Future strategies to improve interprofessional practices should include policies and structural changes to develop healthcare systems that facilitate these practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paula Cristofalo
- Associate Professor, Management Institute, French School of Public Health (EHESP), France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Loh E, Morris J, Thomas L, Bismark MM, Phelps G, Dickinson H. Shining the light on the dark side of medical leadership - a qualitative study in Australia. Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl) 2018; 29:313-30. [PMID: 27397752 DOI: 10.1108/lhs-12-2015-0044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The paper aims to explore the beliefs of doctors in leadership roles of the concept of "the dark side", using data collected from interviews carried out with 45 doctors in medical leadership roles across Australia. The paper looks at the beliefs from the perspectives of doctors who are already in leadership roles themselves; to identify potential barriers they might have encountered and to arrive at better-informed strategies to engage more doctors in the leadership of the Australian health system. The research question is: "What are the beliefs of medical leaders that form the key themes or dimensions of the negative perception of the 'dark side'?". Design/methodology/approach The paper analysed data from two similar qualitative studies examining medical leadership and engagement in Australia by the same author, in collaboration with other researchers, which used in-depth semi-structured interviews with 45 purposively sampled senior medical leaders in leadership roles across Australia in health services, private and public hospitals, professional associations and health departments. The data were analysed using deductive and inductive approaches through a coding framework based on the interview data and literature review, with all sections of coded data grouped into themes. Findings Medical leaders had four key beliefs about the "dark side" as perceived through the eyes of their own past clinical experience and/or their clinical colleagues. These four beliefs or dimensions of the negative perception colloquially known as "the dark side" are the belief that they lack both managerial and clinical credibility, they have confused identities, they may be in conflict with clinicians, their clinical colleagues lack insight into the complexities of medical leadership and, as a result, doctors are actively discouraged from making the transition from clinical practice to medical leadership roles in the first place. Research limitations/implications This research was conducted within the Western developed-nation setting of Australia and only involved interviews with doctors in medical leadership roles. The findings are therefore limited to the doctors' own perceptions of themselves based on their past experiences and beliefs. Future research involving doctors who have not chosen to transition to leadership roles, or other health practitioners in other settings, may provide a broader perspective. Also, this research was exploratory and descriptive in nature using qualitative methods, and quantitative research can be carried out in the future to extend this research for statistical generalisation. Practical implications The paper includes implications for health organisations, training providers, medical employers and health departments and describes a multi-prong strategy to address this important issue. Originality/value This paper fulfils an identified need to study the concept of "moving to the dark side" as a negative perception of medical leadership and contributes to the evidence in this under-researched area. This paper has used data from two similar studies, combined together for the first time, with new analysis and coding, looking at the concept of the "dark side" to discover new emergent findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erwin Loh
- Monash Health, Clayton, Australia and Monash University , Clayton, Australia
| | - Jennifer Morris
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, Australia
| | - Laura Thomas
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Grant Phelps
- School of Medicine, Deakin University , Victoria, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Morley L, Cashell A. Collaboration in Health Care. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2017; 48:207-216. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2017.02.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Revised: 02/15/2017] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
12
|
Bradd P, Travaglia J, Hayen A. Allied health leadership in New South Wales: a study of perceptions and priorities of allied health leaders. AUST HEALTH REV 2017; 42:316-320. [PMID: 28355529 DOI: 10.1071/ah16135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2016] [Accepted: 02/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective The aim of the present study was to investigate the opinions and perceptions of senior allied health (AH) leaders in relation to AH leadership, governance and organisation from an Australian public health perspective. The target group was the New South Wales (NSW) Health AH directors or advisors, the most senior public AH professionals in NSW. Methods The study was conducted over a 6-month period in 2014-15 and comprised two parts: (1) data collection through a 46-question online survey that sought the views of AH leaders about the field of AH in NSW; and (2) two confirmatory focus groups with members of the NSW Health Allied Health Directors Committee. Results The online questionnaire generated novel information about the field of AH in the public sector of NSW, including the current organisation, governance and culture of AH. Focus group participants explored key findings in greater depth, including the effects of AH on and value of AH to the health system as a whole, as well as the attributes and competencies required by AH leaders. Participants identified the need to build and grow their influence, to more clearly demonstrate AH's contribution and to realign efforts towards more strategic issues influencing governance, performance, professional standards and advocacy. This entailed broadening the vision and scope of AH Directors as well as across discipline leaders. Conclusion The results provide new information about Australian AH leadership, governance, culture and organisation, and highlight potential priorities for future leadership activities. What is known about this topic? Although leadership is considered an essential element in the provision of high-quality health care, leadership across AH remains underexamined. What does this paper add? There is a paucity of literature pertaining to AH leadership nationally and internationally. This paper describes the issues affecting AH leaders and leadership in NSW, as reported by senior AH leaders. What are the implications for practitioners? This study identifies key elements related to AH leadership and governance. Health systems and services can use this information to implement strategies that enhance AH leadership capability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Bradd
- South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sutherland Hospital, Locked Mail Bag 21, Taren Point, NSW 2229, Australia
| | - Joanne Travaglia
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Building 10, Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.
| | - Andrew Hayen
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Building 10, Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Braithwaite J, Westbrook J, Coiera E, Runciman WB, Day R, Hillman K, Herkes J. A systems science perspective on the capacity for change in public hospitals. Isr J Health Policy Res 2017; 6:16. [PMID: 28352457 PMCID: PMC5366102 DOI: 10.1186/s13584-017-0143-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Many types of organisation are difficult to change, mainly due to structural, cultural and contextual barriers. Change in public hospitals is arguably even more problematic than in other types of hospitals, due to features such as structural dysfunctionalities and bureaucracy stemming from being publicly-run institutions. The main goals of this commentary are to bring into focus and highlight the "3 + 3 Decision Framework" proposed by Edwards and Saltman. This aims to help guide policymakers and managers implementing productive change in public hospitals. However, while change from the top is popular, there are powerful front-line clinicians, especially doctors, who can act to counterbalance top-down efforts. Front-line clinicians have cultural characteristics and power that allows them to influence or reject managerial decisions. Clinicians in various lower-level roles can also influence other clinicians to resist or ignore management requirements. The context is further complicated by multi-stakeholder agendas, differing goals, and accumulated inertia. The special status of clinicians, along with other system features of public hospitals, should be factored into efforts to realise major system improvements and progressive change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Braithwaite
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia
| | - J. Westbrook
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - E. Coiera
- Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - W. B. Runciman
- Centre for Population Health Research, School of Health Sciences, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - R. Day
- St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - K. Hillman
- The Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - J. Herkes
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Muddiman E, Bullock AD, MacDonald J, Allery L, Webb KL, Pugsley L. 'It's surprising how differently they treat you': a qualitative analysis of trainee reflections on a new programme for generalist doctors. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e011239. [PMID: 27601487 PMCID: PMC5020751 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES An increase in patients with long-term conditions and complex care needs presents new challenges to healthcare providers around the developed world. In response, more broad-based training programmes have developed to better prepare trainees for the changing landscape of healthcare delivery. This paper focuses on qualitative elements of a longitudinal, mixed-methods evaluation of the postgraduate, post-Foundation Broad-Based Training (BBT) programme in England. It aims to provide a qualitative analysis of trainees' evaluations of whether the programme meets its intentions to develop practitioners adept at managing complex cases, patient focused care, specialty integration and conviction in career choice. We also identify unintended consequences. SETTING 9 focus groups of BBT trainees were held over a 12-month period. Discussions were audio-recorded and subjected to directed content analysis. Data were collected from trainees across all 7 participating regions: East Midlands; West Midlands; Severn; Northern; North Western; Yorkshire and Humber; Kent, Surry and Sussex. PARTICIPANTS Focus group participants (61 in total) from the first and second cohorts of BBT. RESULTS Evidence from trainees indicated that the programme was meeting its aims: trainees valued the extra time to decide on their onward career specialty, having a wider experience and developing a more integrated perspective. They thought of themselves as different and perceived that others they worked alongside also saw them as different. Being different meant benefitting from novel training experiences and opportunities for self-development. However, unintended consequences were feelings of isolation, and uncertainty about professional identity. CONCLUSIONS By spanning boundaries between specialties, trainee generalists have the potential to improve experiences and outcomes for patients with complex health needs. However, the sense of isolation will inhibit this potential. We employ the concept of 'belongingness' to identify challenges related to the implementation of generalist training programmes within existing structures of healthcare provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Muddiman
- Cardiff Unit for Research and Evaluation into Medical and Dental Education (CUREMeDE), Cardiff University School of Social Sciences, Cardiff, UK
| | - A D Bullock
- Cardiff Unit for Research and Evaluation into Medical and Dental Education (CUREMeDE), Cardiff University School of Social Sciences, Cardiff, UK
| | - J MacDonald
- Cardiff University School of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, Cardiff, UK
| | - L Allery
- Cardiff University School of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, Cardiff, UK
| | - K L Webb
- Cardiff Unit for Research and Evaluation into Medical and Dental Education (CUREMeDE), Cardiff University School of Social Sciences, Cardiff, UK
| | - L Pugsley
- Cardiff University School of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Braithwaite J, Clay-Williams R, Vecellio E, Marks D, Hooper T, Westbrook M, Westbrook J, Blakely B, Ludlow K. The basis of clinical tribalism, hierarchy and stereotyping: a laboratory-controlled teamwork experiment. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e012467. [PMID: 27473955 PMCID: PMC4985874 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the basis of multidisciplinary teamwork. In real-world healthcare settings, clinicians often cluster in profession-based tribal silos, form hierarchies and exhibit stereotypical behaviours. It is not clear whether these social structures are more a product of inherent characteristics of the individuals or groups comprising the professions, or attributable to a greater extent to workplace factors. SETTING Controlled laboratory environment with well-appointed, quiet rooms and video and audio equipment. PARTICIPANTS Clinical professionals (n=133) divided into 35 groups of doctors, nurses and allied health professions, or mixed professions. INTERVENTIONS Participants engaged in one of three team tasks, and their performance was video-recorded and assessed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MEASURES Primary: teamwork performance. Secondary, pre-experimental: a bank of personality questionnaires designed to assess participants' individual differences. Postexperimental: the 16-item Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale (MHPTS) to measure teamwork skills; this was self-assessed by participants and also by external raters. In addition, external, arm's length blinded observations of the videotapes were conducted. RESULTS At baseline, there were few significant differences between the professions in collective orientation, most of the personality factors, Machiavellianism and conservatism. Teams generally functioned well, with effective relationships, and exhibited little by way of discernible tribal or hierarchical behaviours, and no obvious differences between groups (F (3, 31)=0.94, p=0.43). CONCLUSIONS Once clinicians are taken out of the workplace and put in controlled settings, tribalism, hierarchical and stereotype behaviours largely dissolve. It is unwise therefore to attribute these factors to fundamental sociological or psychological differences between individuals in the professions, or aggregated group differences. Workplace cultures are more likely to be influential in shaping such behaviours. The results underscore the importance of culture and context in improvement activities. Future initiatives should factor in culture and context as well as individuals' or professions' characteristics as the basis for inducing more lateral teamwork or better interprofessional collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn Clay-Williams
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elia Vecellio
- South Eastern Area Laboratory Services, NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Danielle Marks
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tamara Hooper
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mary Westbrook
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Johanna Westbrook
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brette Blakely
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristiana Ludlow
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hybrid management, organizational configuration, and medical professionalism: evidence from the establishment of a clinical directorate in Portugal. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16 Suppl 2:161. [PMID: 27229146 PMCID: PMC4896258 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1398-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need of improving the governance of healthcare services has brought health professionals into management positions. However, both the processes and outcomes of this policy change highlight differences among the European countries. This article provides in-depth evidence that neither quantitative data nor cross-country comparisons have been able to provide regarding the influence of hybrids in the functioning of hospital organizations and impact on clinicians' autonomy and exposure to hybridization. METHODS The study was designed to witness the process of institutional change from the inside and while that process was underway. It reports a case study carried out in a public hospital in Portugal when the establishment of a clinical directorate was being negotiated. Data collection comprises semi-structured interviews with general managers and surgeons complemented with observations. RESULTS The clinical directorate under study illustrates a divisionalized professional bureaucracy model that combines features of professional bureaucracies and divisionalized forms. The hybrid manager is key to understand the extent to which practising clinicians are more accountable and to whom given that managerial tools of control have not been strengthened, and trust-based relations allow them to keep professional autonomy untouched. In sum, clinicians are allowed to profit from their activity and to perform autonomously from the hospital's board of directors. The advantageous conditions enjoyed by the clinical directorate intensify internal re-stratification in medicine, thus suggesting forms of divisionalized medical professionalism grounded in organizational dynamics. CONCLUSION It is discussed the extent to which policy change to the governance of health organizations regarding the relationship between medicine and management is subject to specific constraints at the workplace level, thus conditioning the expected outcomes of policy setting. The study also highlights the role of hybrid managers in determining the extent to which practising professionals are more accountable to managerial criteria. The overall conclusion is that although medical and managerial values link to each other, clinicians reconfigure managerial criteria according to specific interests. Ultimately, medical autonomy and authority may be reinforced in organizational settings subject to NPM-driven reforms.
Collapse
|
17
|
Braithwaite J. Bridging gaps to promote networked care between teams and groups in health delivery systems: a systematic review of non-health literature. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e006567. [PMID: 26408280 PMCID: PMC4593159 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2014] [Revised: 07/06/2015] [Accepted: 08/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess non-health literature, identify key strategies in promoting more networked teams and groups, apply external ideas to healthcare, and build a model based on these strategies. DESIGN A systematic review of the literature outside of healthcare. METHOD Searches guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) of ABI/INFORM Global, CINAHL, IBSS, MEDLINE and Psychinfo databases following a mind-mapping exercise generating key terms centred on the core construct of gaps across organisational social structures that uncovered 842 empirical articles of which 116 met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction and content analysis via data mining techniques were performed on these articles. RESULTS The research involved subjects in 40 countries, with 32 studies enrolling participants in multiple countries. There were 40 studies conducted wholly or partly in the USA, 46 wholly or partly in continental Europe, 29 wholly or partly in Asia and 12 wholly or partly in Russia or Russian federated countries. Methods employed included 30 mixed or triangulated social science study designs, 39 qualitative studies, 13 experimental studies and 34 questionnaire-based studies, where the latter was mostly to gather data for social network analyses. Four recurring factors underpin a model for promoting networked behaviours and fortifying cross-group cooperation: appreciating the characteristics and nature of gaps between groups; using the leverage of boundary-spanners to bridge two or more groups; applying various mechanisms to stimulate interactive relationships; and mobilising those who can exert positive external influences to promote connections while minimising the impact of those who exacerbate divides. CONCLUSIONS The literature assessed is rich and varied. An evidence-oriented model and strategies for promoting more networked systems are now available for application to healthcare. While caution needs to be exercised in translating outside ideas and studies, drawing on non-health ideas is useful in providing insights into other sectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dickinson H, Ham C, Snelling I, Spurgeon P. Medical leadership arrangements in English healthcare organisations: Findings from a national survey and case studies of NHS trusts. Health Serv Manage Res 2014; 26:119-25. [DOI: 10.1177/0951484814525598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This project sought to describe the involvement of doctors in leadership roles in the NHS and the organisational structures and management processes in use in NHS trusts. A mixed methods approach was adopted combining a questionnaire survey of English NHS trusts and in-depth case studies of nine organisations who responded to the survey. Respondents identified a number of challenges in the development of medical leadership, and there was often perceived to be an engagement gap between medical leaders and doctors in clinical roles. While some progress has been made in the development of medical leadership in the NHS in England, much remains to be done to complete the journey that started with the Griffiths Report in 1983. We conclude that a greater degree of professionalism needs to be brought to bear in the development of medical leadership. This includes developing career structures to make it easier for doctors to take on leadership roles; providing training, development and support in management and leadership at different stages of doctors’ careers; and ensuring that pay and other rewards are commensurate with the responsibilities of medical leaders. The time commitment of medical leaders and the proportion of doctors in leadership roles both need to increase. The paper concludes considering the implications of these findings for other health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Dickinson
- Melbourne School of Government, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Peter Spurgeon
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kuhlmann E, von Knorring M. Management and medicine: why we need a new approach to the relationship. J Health Serv Res Policy 2014; 19:189-191. [DOI: 10.1177/1355819614524946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
New Public Management has affected the relationship between corporate managerialism and professional modes of governing hospitals. While doctors’ increasing involvement in management may have positive effects on health care, hospital governance, health care policies and medical education have largely failed to support this change. There is a need for new policies and approaches to support the changing connections between medicine and management that abandons both the military discourse of ‘wars’ and ‘battlefields’ and the new rhetoric of ‘clinical leadership’.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Kuhlmann
- Senior Researcher, Institute of Economics, Labour and Culture, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Mia von Knorring
- Researcher and Lecturer in Medical Management, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Long JC, Cunningham FC, Carswell P, Braithwaite J. Who are the key players in a new translational research network? BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13:338. [PMID: 23987790 PMCID: PMC3844428 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2013] [Accepted: 08/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Professional networks are used increasingly in health care to bring together members from different sites and professions to work collaboratively. Key players within these networks are known to affect network function through their central or brokerage position and are therefore of interest to those who seek to optimise network efficiency. However, their identity may not be apparent. This study using social network analysis to ask: (1) Who are the key players of a new translational research network (TRN)? (2) Do they have characteristics in common? (3) Are they recognisable as powerful, influential or well connected individuals? Methods TRN members were asked to complete an on-line, whole network survey which collected demographic information expected to be associated with key player roles, and social network questions about collaboration in current TRN projects. Three questions asked who they perceived as powerful, influential and well connected. Indegree and betweenness centrality values were used to determine key player status in the actual and perceived networks and tested for association with demographic and descriptive variables using chi square analyses. Results Response rate for the online survey was 76.4% (52/68). The TRN director and manager were identified as key players along with six other members. Only two of nine variables were associated with actual key player status; none with perceived. The main finding was the mismatch between actual and perceived brokers. Members correctly identified two of the three central actors (the two mandated key roles director and manager) but there were only three correctly identified actual brokers among the 19 perceived brokers. Possible reasons for the mismatch include overlapping structures and weak knowledge of members. Conclusions The importance of correctly identifying these key players is discussed in terms of network interventions to improve efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet C Long
- Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Kensington 2052, Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Long JC, Cunningham FC, Braithwaite J. Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13:158. [PMID: 23631517 PMCID: PMC3648408 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 187] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2012] [Accepted: 04/23/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners facilitate transactions and the flow of information between people or groups who either have no physical or cognitive access to one another, or alternatively, who have no basis on which to trust each other. The health care sector is a context that is rich in isolated clusters, such as silos and professional "tribes," in need of connectivity. It is a key challenge in health service management to understand, analyse and exploit the role of key agents who have the capacity to connect disparate groupings in larger systems. METHODS The empirical, peer reviewed, network theory literature on brokerage roles was reviewed for the years 1994 to 2011 following PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS The 24 articles that made up the final literature set were from a wide range of settings and contexts not just healthcare. Methods of data collection, analysis, and the ways in which brokers were identified varied greatly. We found four main themes addressed in the literature: identifying brokers and brokerage opportunities, generation and integration of innovation, knowledge brokerage, and trust. The benefits as well as the costs of brokerage roles were examined. CONCLUSIONS Collaborative networks by definition, seek to bring disparate groups together so that they can work effectively and synergistically together. Brokers can support the controlled transfer of specialised knowledge between groups, increase cooperation by liaising with people from both sides of the gap, and improve efficiency by introducing "good ideas" from one isolated setting into another.There are significant costs to brokerage. Densely linked networks are more efficient at diffusing information to all their members when compared to sparsely linked groups. This means that while a bridge across a structural hole allows information to reach actors that were previously isolated, it is not the most efficient way to transfer information. Brokers who become the holders of, or the gatekeepers to, specialised knowledge or resources can become overwhelmed by the role and so need support in order to function optimally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet C Long
- Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
| | - Frances C Cunningham
- Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bellazzi R, Sacchi L, Caffi E, de Vincenzi A, Nai M, Manicone F, Larizza C, Bellazzi R. Implementation of an automated system for monitoring adherence to hemodialysis treatment: A report of seven years of experience. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81:320-31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2011] [Revised: 01/20/2012] [Accepted: 01/23/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
23
|
Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. Will information and communication technology disrupt the health system and deliver on its promise? Med J Aust 2010; 193:399-400. [PMID: 20919970 DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03968.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2010] [Accepted: 08/11/2010] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Investment in information and communication technology (ICT) in the health sector can bring important benefits. To date, the focus has been on automating clinical work practices such as ordering tests and prescriptions, which significantly improves efficiency and safety. Uptake of ICT has been slow and the results less favourable than anticipated for various reasons, including poor integration of systems into complex clinical work processes, limited training, and the intermittent nature of ICT funding. As a result, many health care organisations have been operating hybrid paper and computer systems that introduce new patient risks, staff frustration, and outcomes below expectation. The focus must shift from automation of clinical work to innovation; from evolutionary application of ICT to revolutionary uses. Health professionals must embrace ICT as a "disruptive technology" that will produce significant changes in their roles and responsibilities and lead to real health reform with new, innovative models of health care delivery. As other industries have shown, substitution and role changes are areas in which ICT can lead to the greatest gains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna I Westbrook
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Walsh K, Burns C, Antony J. Electronic adverse incident reporting in hospitals. Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl) 2010. [DOI: 10.1108/17511871011079047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
25
|
Creswick N, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. Understanding communication networks in the emergency department. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9:247. [PMID: 20043845 PMCID: PMC2809061 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2009] [Accepted: 12/31/2009] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Emergency departments (EDs) are high pressure health care settings involving complex interactions between staff members in providing and organising patient care. Without good communication and cooperation amongst members of the ED team, quality of care is at risk. This study examined the problem-solving, medication advice-seeking and socialising networks of staff working in an Australian hospital ED. Methods A social network survey (Response Rate = 94%) was administered to all ED staff (n = 109) including doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, administrative staff and ward assistants. Analysis of the network characteristics was carried out by applying measures of density (the extent participants are concentrated), connectedness (how related they are), isolates (how segregated), degree centrality (who has most connections measured in two ways, in-degree, the number of ties directed to an individual and out-degree, the number of ties directed from an individual), betweenness centrality (who is important or powerful), degree of separation (how many ties lie between people) and reciprocity (how bi-directional are interactions). Results In all three networks, individuals were more closely connected to colleagues from within their respective professional groups. The problem-solving network was the most densely connected network, followed by the medication advice network, and the loosely connected socialising network. ED staff relied on each other for help to solve work-related problems, but some senior doctors, some junior doctors and a senior nurse were important sources of medication advice for their ED colleagues. Conclusions Network analyses provide useful ways to assess social structures in clinical settings by allowing us to understand how ED staff relate within their social and professional structures. This can provide insights of potential benefit to ED staff, their leaders, policymakers and researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nerida Creswick
- Health Informatics Research and Evaluation Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J, Gibson K, Paoloni R, Callen J, Georgiou A, Creswick N, Robertson L. Use of information and communication technologies to support effective work practice innovation in the health sector: a multi-site study. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9:201. [PMID: 19895703 PMCID: PMC2776590 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2009] [Accepted: 11/08/2009] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Widespread adoption of information and communication technologies (ICT) is a key strategy to meet the challenges facing health systems internationally of increasing demands, rising costs, limited resources and workforce shortages. Despite the rapid increase in ICT investment, uptake and acceptance has been slow and the benefits fewer than expected. Absent from the research literature has been a multi-site investigation of how ICT can support and drive innovative work practice. This Australian-based project will assess the factors that allow health service organisations to harness ICT, and the extent to which such systems drive the creation of new sustainable models of service delivery which increase capacity and provide rapid, safe, effective, affordable and sustainable health care. DESIGN A multi-method approach will measure current ICT impact on workforce practices and develop and test new models of ICT use which support innovations in work practice. The research will focus on three large-scale commercial ICT systems being adopted in Australia and other countries: computerised ordering systems, ambulatory electronic medical record systems, and emergency medicine information systems. We will measure and analyse each system's role in supporting five key attributes of work practice innovation: changes in professionals' roles and responsibilities; integration of best practice into routine care; safe care practices; team-based care delivery; and active involvement of consumers in care. DISCUSSION A socio-technical approach to the use of ICT will be adopted to examine and interpret the workforce and organisational complexities of the health sector. The project will also focus on ICT as a potentially disruptive innovation that challenges the way in which health care is delivered and consequently leads some health professionals to view it as a threat to traditional roles and responsibilities and a risk to existing models of care delivery. Such views have stifled debate as well as wider explorations of ICT's potential benefits, yet firm evidence of the effects of role changes on health service outcomes is limited. This project will provide important evidence about the role of ICT in supporting new models of care delivery across multiple healthcare organizations and about the ways in which innovative work practice change is diffused.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna I Westbrook
- Health Informatics Research & Evaluation Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East St, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, 10 Arthur St, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Kathryn Gibson
- Rheumatology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Locked Bag 7103, Liverpool BC, NSW 1871, Australia
| | - Richard Paoloni
- Emergency Department, Concord Hospital, Hospital Rd, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia
| | - Joanne Callen
- Health Informatics Research & Evaluation Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East St, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia
| | - Andrew Georgiou
- Health Informatics Research & Evaluation Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East St, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia
| | - Nerida Creswick
- Health Informatics Research & Evaluation Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East St, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia
| | - Louise Robertson
- Information Services Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2040, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Edmonstone J. Clinical leadership: the elephant in the room. Int J Health Plann Manage 2009; 24:290-305. [DOI: 10.1002/hpm.959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
28
|
Travaglia JF, Westbrook MT, Braithwaite J. Implementation of a patient safety incident management system as viewed by doctors, nurses and allied health professionals. Health (London) 2009; 13:277-96. [PMID: 19366837 DOI: 10.1177/1363459308101804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Incident reporting systems have become a central mechanism of most health services patient safety strategies. In this article we compare health professionals' anonymous, free text responses in an evaluation of a newly implemented electronic incident management system. The professions' answers were compared using classic content analysis and Leximancer, a computer assisted text analysis package. The classic analysis identified issues which differentiated the professions. More doctors commented on lack of feedback following incidents and evaluated the system negatively. More allied health staff found that the system lacked fields necessary to report incidents. More nurses complained incident reporting was time consuming. The Leximancer analysis revealed that while the professions all used the more frequently employed concepts (which described basic components of the reporting system), nurses and allied health shared many additional concepts concerned with actual reporting. Doctors applied fewer and more unique (used only by one profession) concepts when writing about the system. Doctors' unique concepts centred on criticism of the incident management system and the broader implications of safety issues, while the other professions' unique concepts focused on more practical issues. The classic analysis identified specific problems needing to be targeted in ongoing modifications of the system. The Leximancer findings, while complementing the classical analysis results, gave greater insight into professional groups' attitudes that relate to use of the system, e.g. doctors' relatively limited conceptual vocabulary regarding the system was consistent with their lower incident reporting rates. Such professional differences in reaction to healthcare innovations may constrain inter-disciplinary communication and cooperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne F Travaglia
- Centre for Clinical Governance Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
|
30
|
Westbrook MT, Braithwaite J, Travaglia JF, Long D, Jorm C, Iedema RA, Ledema RA. Promoting safety: longer-term responses of three health professional groups to a safety improvement programme. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2008; 20:555-71. [PMID: 18030958 DOI: 10.1108/09526860710822707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient safety has been addressed since 2002 in the health system of New South Wales, Australia via a Safety Improvement Programme (SIP), which took a system-wide approach. The programme involved two-day courses to educate healthcare professionals to monitor and report incidents and analyse adverse events by conducting root cause analysis (RCA). This paper aims to predict that all professions would favour SIP but that their work and educational histories would result in doctors holding the least and nurses the most positive attitudes. Alternative hypotheses were that doctors' relative power and other professions' team-working skills would advantage the respective groups when conducting RCAs. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH Responses to a 2005 follow-up questionnaire survey of doctors (n = 53), nurses (209) and allied health staff (59), who had participated in SIP courses, were analysed to compare: their attitudes toward the course; safety skills acquired and applied; perceived benefits of SIP and RCAs; and their experiences conducting RCAs. FINDINGS Significant differences existed between professions' responses with nurses being the most and doctors the least affirming. Allied health responses resembled those of nurses more than those of doctors. The professions' experiences conducting RCAs (number conducted, leadership, barriers encountered, findings implemented) were similar. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS Observational studies are needed to determine possible professional differences in the conduct of RCAs and any ensuing culture change that this may be eliciting. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS There is strong professional support for SIPs but less endorsement from doctors, who tend not to prefer the knowledge content and multidisciplinary teaching environment considered optimal for safety improvement education. This is a dilemma that needs to be addressed. ORIGINALITY/VALUE Few longer-term SIPs' assessments have been realised and the differences between professional groups have not been well quantified. As a result of this paper, benefits of and barriers to conducting RCAs are now more clearly understood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary T Westbrook
- Centre for Clinical Governance Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Braithwaite J, Iedema RA, Jorm C. Trust, communication, theory of mind and the social brain hypothesis: deep explanations for what goes wrong in health care. J Health Organ Manag 2007; 21:353-67. [PMID: 17933368 DOI: 10.1108/14777260710778899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the paper is to examine the deep conceptual underpinnings of trust and communication breakdowns via selected health inquiries into things that go wrong using evolutionary psychology. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH This paper explains how this is carried out, and explores some of the adverse consequences for patient care. Evolutionary psychology provides a means of explaining important mental capacities and constructs including theory of mind and the social brain hypothesis. To have a theory of mind is to be able to read others' behaviours, linguistic and non-verbal cues, and analyse their intentions. To have a social (or Machiavellian) brain means being able to assess, compete with and, where necessary, outwit others. In the tough and complex environment of the contemporary health setting, not too different from the Pleistocene, humans display a well-developed theory of mind and social brains and, using mental attributes and behavioural repertoires evolved for the deep past in hunter-gatherer bands, survive and thrive in difficult circumstances. FINDINGS The paper finds that, while such behaviours cannot be justified, armed with an evolutionary approach one can predict survival mechanisms such as turf protection, competitive strategies, sending transgressors and whistleblowers to Coventry, self-interest, and politics and tribal behaviours. ORIGINALITY/VALUE The paper shows that few studies examine contemporary health sector behaviours through an evolutionary psychology lens or via such deep accounts of human nature.
Collapse
|
32
|
Braithwaite J. Analysing structural and cultural change in acute settings using a Giddens-Weick paradigmatic approach. HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS 2007; 14:91-102. [PMID: 17195577 DOI: 10.1007/s10728-006-0014-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
An examination of the salient literature on hospital clinical directorates (CDs) is presented. A critique of the largely managerialist, instrumental, hortatory and normative extant literature about CDs is offered. In analysing the literature this way the earlier promotional and critical literature is eschewed in favour of an evaluative approach. CDs are then reconceptualised by locating them within two overarching accounts of social structure--formalised, prescribed frameworks, and enacted, patterned interactions--following the kinds of distinctions made by Giddens, Weick, social action and institutional theorists. Social structure as it relates to culture is also considered, following Martin. Such an approach facilitates an understanding of the general weaknesses of health service perspectives and methods of analysis, and exposes the strengths of Giddens-Weick type paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Braithwaite J. An empirical assessment of social structural and cultural change in clinical directorates. HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS 2007; 14:185-93. [PMID: 17214253 DOI: 10.1007/s10728-006-0025-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The results of two observational studies of clinical directorates (CDs) are presented. The paper exposes fresh perspectives about the management of hospitals and CDs, and suggests that the most important axis on which hospital decision-making rests continues to be profession rather than the CD, even though CDs are designed at least in part to mitigate professional tribalism and bridge professional divides. In empiricising social structural and cultural theories it seems clear that changes to the prescribed organisational framework, which CDs represent, have had negligible effects on behaviour. This being the case, the paper questions the benefits alleged to have accrued from establishing CDs and calls for more effective, micro-behavioural change strategies than merely altering the structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Braithwaite J, Westbrook MT, Mallock NA, Travaglia JF, Iedema RA. Experiences of health professionals who conducted root cause analyses after undergoing a safety improvement programme. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15:393-9. [PMID: 17142585 PMCID: PMC2464895 DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2006] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research on root cause analysis (RCA), a pivotal component of many patient safety improvement programmes, is limited. OBJECTIVE To study a cohort of health professionals who conducted RCAs after completing the NSW Safety Improvement Program (SIP). HYPOTHESIS Participants in RCAs would: (1) differ in demographic profile from non-participants, (2) encounter problems conducting RCAs as a result of insufficient system support, (3) encounter more problems if they had conducted fewer RCAs and (4) have positive attitudes regarding RCA and safety. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Anonymous questionnaire survey of 252 health professionals, drawn from a larger sample, who attended 2-day SIP courses across New South Wales, Australia. OUTCOME MEASURES Demographic variables, experiences conducting RCAs, attitudes and safety skills acquired. RESULTS No demographic variables differentiated RCA participants from non-participants. The difficulties experienced while conducting RCAs were lack of time (75.0%), resources (45.0%) and feedback (38.3%), and difficulties with colleagues (44.5%), RCA teams (34.2%), other professions (26.9%) and management (16.7%). Respondents reported benefits from RCAs, including improved patient safety (87.9%) and communication about patient care (79.8%). SIP courses had given participants skills to conduct RCAs (92.8%) and improve their safety practices (79.6%). Benefits from the SIP were thought to justify the investment by New South Wales Health (74.6%) and committing staff resources (72.6%). Most (84.8%) of the participants wanted additional RCA training. CONCLUSIONS RCA participants reported improved skills and commitment to safety, but greater support from the workplace and health system are necessary to maintain momentum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Clinical Governance Research in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Braithwaite J, Westbrook MT, Iedema RA. Giving Voice to Health Professionals' Attitudes About Their Clinical Service Structures in Theoretical Context. HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS 2005; 13:315-35. [PMID: 16435468 DOI: 10.1007/s10728-005-8128-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Within the context of structural theories this paper examines what health professionals say about their clinical service structures. We firstly trace various conceptual perspectives on clinical service structures, discussing multiple theoretical axes. These theories question whether clinical service structures represent either superficial or more profound changes in hospitals. We secondly explore which view is supported though a content analysis of the free text responses of 111 health professionals (44 doctors, 45 nurses and 22 allied health practitioners) about their clinical service structures in a questionnaire survey in two large hospitals that had implemented clinical service structures three years previously. Commentaries unfavourable toward clinical service structures were made by 47.7% of staff, favourable by 24.3%, mixed (both favourable and unfavourable) by 17.1% and non-evaluative statements were made by 10.8%. The most frequent criticisms were inefficient organisation of change (27%), poor management (24.3%), lack of cooperation between staff (15.9%) and failure to empower health practitioners (13.5%). All professions made more negative than positive evaluations of their clinical service structures but the ratio was highest for doctors and lowest for allied health. Ranking of nurses' and allied health staffs' specific evaluations were similar but both differed significantly from doctors'. Unfavourable or negative comments predominated, and change appears more superficial and less profound than advocates of structural contributions hope. Four types of belief systems about clinical service structures are apparent. Some study participants are disposed toward the status quo; others toward restructuring; yet others are team oriented; and a final group is tribally oriented. The implication of this paper for managers is that more work is needed if clinical service structures are to realise the promise of more multi-disciplinarity and less fragmentation across professional groups. For scholars, the implication is that marrying different theoretical frames with empirical data can serve to produce fresh perspectives and perhaps new insights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Clinical Governance Research in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Braithwaite J. Hunter-gatherer human nature and health system safety: an evolutionary cleft stick? Int J Qual Health Care 2005; 17:541-5. [PMID: 15967775 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The stunning archaeological find of a new species of human dubbed the hobbit, formally named Homo floresiensis, is a reminder that humans and hobbits are evolved for transient lives, subsisting in an environment radically different from that of contemporary societies. Although the problems facing health systems are well documented, few scholars have taken an evolutionary-level approach to understanding them. By considering the nature of humans as adapted not for modern societies but for hunter-gatherer existence, and examining what humans were evolved for, new light can be shed on contemporary behaviours exposed by the medical inquiries into what is going wrong in acute health systems. Investigation of two of these inquiries shows how health professionals under pressure typically default to tribal behaviours, have recourse to hierarchies and engage in turf protection routines. Those who have conducted studies into iatrogenic harm or presided over the medical inquiries have argued that culture change is the solution to health care's ills. This is likely to be much harder to institute than some people realize, especially given our underlying hunter-gatherer nature. This is an evolutionary cleft stick that has not been factored in by those optimistic about health sector reform. The implications are that we need a deep understanding of human nature in addressing health system problems and to recognize that profound culture change is more challenging than many believe. Paradoxically, it is when humans are faced with seemingly intractable problems that a collective way forward might emerge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Clinical Governance Research, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|