Benefit-finding among young adults with spina bifida

Inclusive measure development: amplifying the voices of adolescents and young adults with spina bifida in a new measure of benefit-finding and growth

OBJECTIVE

Benefit-finding and growth is an important process across a range of medical populations. However, it has been understudied in the context of lifelong chronic conditions, such as spina bifida (SB). This study aimed to develop a new measure of benefit-finding and growth for youth with SB, confirm its factor structure, and examine its psychometric properties.

METHOD

To generate items for the new measure, 20 adolescents and young adults with SB completed qualitative interviews regarding their experience of living with SB. Interviews were coded for benefits. Questionnaire items were generated from these benefits, and an expert panel refined the wording of these items. The resultant 31-item measure was shared with six of the 20 participants for feedback and then piloted among 251 youth with SB. The factor structure of the measure was confirmed and reliability and convergent validity were assessed.

RESULTS

Both a one- and four-factor structure were supported. The four factors include: Life Perspectives and Priorities, Personal Characteristics and Traits, Connections and Opportunities, and Problem Solving. Higher total and factor scores represent greater benefit-finding and growth. The measure demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.95). The new measure also showed significant positive correlations with optimism, positive affect, and life satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

This study produced a measure of benefit-finding and growth for youth with SB. Clinically, information about what youth with SB perceive to be their areas of strength and growth from their condition provides crucial insight into which factors to enhance in this population.

The Relationship Between Benefit Finding and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The Mediating Effects of Self-Management

Objective

To explore the relationships among benefit finding (BF), self-management, and quality of life (QOL) among patients with COPD.

Methods

A total of 205 patients with COPD were selected via a convenient sampling method. BF refers to the ability to find meaning or benefit from difficult situations. The Benefit Finding Scale (BFS), self-management scale, and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (MOS SF-36) were used to investigate BF, self-management and QOL (including a physical component summary (PCS) and a psychological component summary (MCS)). Structural equation modeling was used to examine the relationships among BF, self-management and QOL in patients with COPD and to analyze the effects of BF and self-management on QOL.

Results

The total QOL score of patients with COPD was 61.38±21.15, and the PCS and MCS scores were 57.67±23.60 and 65.09±21.24, respectively. BF and self-management had positive predictive effects on both the PCS (βBF = 0.519, PBF = 0.012; βself-management = 0.473, Pself-management = 0.012) and MCS (βBF = 0.425, PBF = 0.013; βself-management = 0.535, Pself-management = 0.016) of patients with COPD, and self-management mediated the relationships of BF with the PCS (β = 0.144, P = 0.008) and MCS (β = 0.162, P = 0.007).

Conclusion

The QOL of patients with COPD needs to be improved, especially in terms of physical aspects. Helping COPD patients obtain better BF not only helps them improve their PCS and MCS directly but also indirectly through enhancing self-management to improve their PCS and MCS.

Benefit finding in first-ever young and middle-aged patients who had a stroke and their spousal caregivers in China: a longitudinal mixed-methods study protocol

INTRODUCTION

The global burden caused by stroke is shifting to young and middle-aged people. Researchers have emphasised the significance of benefit finding (BF) in psychological health. However, current research has paid little attention to stroke and has discussed BF from only a single perspective, that is, that of either patients or caregivers. Our study aims to understand the changing trajectory, predictors and dyadic interaction of BF in dyads of patient who had a stroke and caregiver.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a longitudinal mixed-methods, multicentre study. A total of 142 patients who had a stroke and 142 spousal caregivers will be investigated. Participants will be recruited from four large public hospitals in northern China. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected at five time points (near discharge and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following discharge). Validated and reliable questionnaires will be used in quantitative studies. Information on sociodemographic data, BF, functional status, perceived stress, coping styles and mutuality will be collected from the dyads. Qualitative data will be collected via semistructured interviews and observations. The growth mixture model will be used to analyse quantitative data, and Colaizzi's seven-step analysis method will be used to analyse qualitative data. We plan to conduct parallel but separate quantitative and qualitative data analyses and ultimately integrate the data sets to determine confirmation, expansion or discordance.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All participants will be provided with an informed consent form. This study will encode all identifiable data and store all recorded data on a secure research server. This study has been approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the College of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University (ZZUIRB2020-53). The results of the longitudinal study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2000039509.