'Either something's wrong, or I'm a terrible parent': A systematic review of parent experiences of illness-related interpretations for unsettled babies

AIMS

To explore parents' experiences of unsettled babies and medical labels.

DESIGN

Qualitative systematic review, thematic synthesis and development of a conceptual model.

REVIEW METHODS

Systematic review and thematic synthesis of primary, qualitative research into parents' experiences of unsettled babies <12 months of age. 'Unsettled' was defined as perception of excessive crying with additional feature(s) such as vomiting, skin or stool problems. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist was used to assess trustworthiness.

DATA SOURCES

Structured searches completed in CINAHL, Medline, Embase, PsychINFO and CochraneCT on 23 March 2022 and rerun on 14 April 2023.

RESULTS

Ten eligible studies were included across eight countries contributing data from 103 mothers and 24 fathers. Two analytical themes and eight descriptive themes were developed. Firstly, parents expressed fearing judgement, feeling guilty and out of control as a result of babies' unsettled symptoms and seeking strategies to construct an 'Identity as a "Good Parent"'. This desire for positive parenting identity underpinned the second analytical theme 'Searching for an explanation' which included seeking external (medical) causes for babies' unsettled behaviours.

CONCLUSION

Parents can become trapped in a cycle of 'searching for an explanation' for their baby's unsettled behaviours, experiencing considerable distress which is exacerbated by feelings of guilt and failure.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE

Insight gained from this review could inform interventions to support parents, reducing inaccurate medicalization. Health visiting teams supporting parents with unsettled baby behaviour could focus on supporting a positive parenting identity by managing expectations, normalizing the continuum of infant behaviours, reducing feelings of guilt or uncertainty and helping parents regain a feeling of control.

REPORTING METHOD

ENTREQ guidelines were adhered to in the reporting of this review.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Parent input was crucial in the design phase; shaping the language used (e.g., 'unsettled babies') and in the analysis sense-checking findings.

Anthropological and sociological perspectives on food allergy

This review explores the anthropological and sociological literature on food allergy and identifies four primary areas of research to date. The first explores the relationality and management of risk, uncertainty and stigma among parents and sufferers of food allergies. The second analyses the influence of intersectionality, specifically the effects of class, gender, race/ethnicity and disability on experiences of food allergy. The third discusses diagnostic difficulties and the impact these have on legitimacy and believability, both in the context of clinician-patient relations and in managing food allergies in public spaces. The fourth explores the ethics and uncertainties in food allergy treatments and how scientific knowledge of emerging treatments is constructed. This body of research illustrates that although an individual disease, food allergy experiences are significantly affected by socio-cultural structures, institutions, ideologies and discourses. The review concludes with four primary recommendations. First, there should be more incorporation of anthropological or sociological methodologies and perspectives into studies of food allergy. Second, studies are needed from more countries exploring lived experience of food allergy. Third, research on food allergy needs to incorporate an analysis of intersectional factors such as gender, class and race/ethnicity, and should explore the experiences of minority populations. Fourth, more research is needed on the interactions between biomedicine and local systems of knowledge, as well as the factors that shape what treatments become available, for whom it becomes available, experiences of treatment and aspects (including biases) that influence patient-clinician interactions.

Historical and social science perspectives on food allergy

This article provides an overview of the insights social scientists, historians and other health humanities scholars have made to our understanding of food allergies. It shows how humanities and social science scholars have tended to address three pivotal issues related to food allergies: first, they have addressed the epidemiology of food allergies, including the apparent rise in the rate of food allergies and the emergence of theories that purport to explain why food allergies may be increasing. These include theories related to changes in food consumption and the hygiene hypothesis. Second, humanities and social science scholars have researched how risks related to food allergies have been constructed, understood, experienced and mitigated. Third, humanities and social science scholars have investigated the experiences of food allergy sufferers and those who care for them, providing valuable qualitative insights that can inform how we respond to food allergy and our understanding of the aetiology of food allergy. The article concludes with three recommendations. First, there should be a more interdisciplinary approach to food allergy research that involves social scientists and health humanities scholars. Second, humanities and social sciences scholars should be more willing to unpack and scrutinise the theories put forward to explain the aetiology of food allergies, rather than accepting them at face value. And finally, humanities and social sciences scholars can play a major role in ensuring that the experiences of patients and their carers are articulated and fed into debates about food allergy, including its causes and how to respond to it.

Children at risk of anaphylaxis: A mixed-studies systematic review of parents' experiences and information needs

Objective

To explore parents' self-reported experiences and information needs regarding recognition and management of pediatric anaphylaxis.

Methods

We searched Ovid Medline, Ovid PsychInfo, CINAHL Plus, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature to identify primary studies in English or French published since 2000. We used a mixed-method appraisal tool and convergent integrated approach to assess quality and synthesize data, respectively.

Results

43 studies were included (22 quantitative, 19 qualitative, and 2 mixed-method); 77% of studies had high methodological quality. Parents' experiences were categorized as: recognizing an anaphylactic reaction; managing and responding to a reaction; emotional impact of caring for a child at risk of anaphylaxis; and interaction with the health system and healthcare providers. Parents' information needs were categorized into themes relating to: gaps in knowledge and information; type of information desired; information sources; and information delivery format.

Conclusion

Negative emotional experiences and a general lack of information were commonly reported by parents of included studies. Provision of relevant and comprehensible information may help parents to make informed decisions and manage reactions promptly.

Innovation

The findings of this review are guiding the development of an innovative knowledge translation tool (KT) as part of a larger initiative of developing a suite of parent-focused KT tools for acute childhood conditions.

Passive tolerance and productive uncertainties in food allergy immunotherapy biomedical practices

There has been little sociological research on food allergy in North America, despite the fact that it impacts a significant population in the US and Canada. Immunotherapy for food allergy is now a prominent area of investigation and experts argue it is one dimension of a 'paradigm shift' that encourages exposure to food allergens in contrast to avoidance of them. This article reports on an ethnographic investigation of immunotherapy for food allergy research and practice between the years 2015 and 2020. I report on analyses of N = 31 in-depth interviews with spokespersons with different types of engagement in immunotherapy and over 100 h of ethnographic observations at clinical and scientific conferences. My research revealed the entangled ontologies of food and drug in immunotherapy and related uncertainties in the diagnoses of food allergy, which catalysed further uncertainty about who is receiving and who should receive immunotherapy (IT). Relatedly, there are uncertainties about the goals and/or outcomes of IT. I elaborate on previous sociological work about how uncertainty is valued in medicine and science. I argue shared uncertainties and mutual scepticism in IT co-exist, representing a passive (productive) tolerance and reticently accepted form of tension in the domain, which have resulted in calls for intra-professional and inter-professional collaborations and the involvement of other stakeholders in knowledge making regarding food allergy immunotherapy.

Becoming a diagnostic agent: A collated ethnography of digital-sensory work in caregiving intra-actions

Sociological contributions on digital health have acknowledged the enduring significance of sensory work in diagnosis and practices of care. Previous explorations of these digital and sensory entanglements have focused separately on healthcare providers or patients/caregivers, rarely bringing these worlds together. Our analysis, based on the collation of ethnographic fieldwork in clinics, medical schools, and homes in Australia, offers rare insights into caregiver and practitioner perspectives. We interrogate the work involved in digital-sensory becoming, as caregivers (in our case parents) learn to assign diagnostic meaning to potential childhood disease. Working with Karen Barad's concept of 'intra-action', we demonstrate how diagnostic knowing is enacted between practitioners, parents, senses, and devices. We identify seven aspects of digital-sensory learning: attention to the change from normal; testing/searching for signs and symptoms; confirmation and direction from more experienced others; mimicry; analogy/metaphor; digital archiving; and reference to validated digitised signs. We found that this learning does not take place discretely in the clinic or at home. Doctors and parents both do digital-sensory work to register, co-witness, and mutually enact disease by interpreting signs and symptoms together in their caregiving intra-actions. Our article also champions collated ethnography as a methodological approach for making sense of complex assemblages in healthcare.

Parents Experiences Raising a Child with Food Allergy; A Qualitative Review

PROBLEM

Food allergies are one of the fastest growing public health concerns without a cure, affecting approximately 8% of the world's child population. Being the parent of a child with allergies may lead to concerns, and affect everyday life in the family. The aim was to synthesize and describe parents' experiences of living with food allergies in families when one of the children has a food allergy.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

A systematic search using subject terms and text words was performed in Cinahl (Ebsco), Swemed+, Medline (OVID) and Scopus in October 2017. The search was limited to parents with children and adolescents, for the years from 2006 to October 2017.

SAMPLE

One hundred and forty articles were screened and 24 were included.

RESULTS

A meta-summery of the results from the included studies were conducted. The parents lived in fear, after their child had their first reaction and had become allergic, a life threatening experience. They tried to live an ordinary family life and parents had to learn how to be one-step ahead and understand early signs. The family's social life was also influenced. Parents asked for support and information from health professionals and more knowledge and skills increased parents' manageability.

CONCLUSION

Parents need support and a seamless encounter with health professionals, with multidisciplinary collaboration and knowledge sharing to develop the parents' self-efficacy.

IMPLICATIONS

Health professionals must provide information and support parents on their path through the health-care system in having a child with a food allergy.

The management of situated risk: A parental perspective on child food allergy

Food allergy is an illness that requires constant risk management in everyday life. To date, there is no cure or preventive treatment, and the only way to manage the condition is therefore careful avoidance of the offending foodstuff and treatment of reactions when they occur. This article draws on a socio-cultural approach to explore parents’ understandings and management of child food allergy in the context of everyday life, as ‘situated’ risk. A focus group study was carried out with 31 parents of children diagnosed with food allergy at two children’s hospitals. The analysis of the focus group material reveals how the management of allergy risk seems to permeate most aspects of everyday life as well as how the parents draw on a dominant norm of risk avoidance as well as a counter-discourse of calculated risk taking. The patterns of risk management found in this study are discussed in terms of how risk avoidance and risk taking are intertwined and balanced in the context of moral parenthood.

“Because being fat means being sick”: children at risk of type 2 diabetes

This study addresses the social and cultural underpinnings that shape children’s risk of type 2 diabetes, as identified by a racially and economically diverse group of parents and their children living in Anaheim, California. Based on in-depth interviews with 28 adults and 17 children, we explored how they understood what constitutes “good health” in children and the aspects of their neighborhoods and communities that acted as resources or impediments to their children’s well-being. We found that parents and children employed a language of food that reflected a fear-based, medicalized orientation to food consumption. Although nearly all agreed that children should stay active, densely populated neighborhoods, apartment complexes with rigid outdoor rules, high crime rates, police surveillance, and diminished access to public parks and recreational facilities posed challenges. Similarly problematic were deficits in school lunch programs and the limited sometimes demeaning, conversations with healthcare professionals about diabetes risk and prevention. Together, these narratives identify key structural processes attendant to type 2 diabetes risk in children and call for a more politicized conversation regarding prevention strategies and public healthcare practices.

'I take a small amount of the real product': Elevated cholesterol and everyday medical reasoning in liminal space

The medical consequences of elevated cholesterol are widely known, as are the medical regimens to control and manage it. At the same time, elevated cholesterol is bereft of bodily signs. Being symptomless places the condition in a no man's land: people with elevated cholesterol are assessed as medically sick but their bodies signal wellness. In this article I refer to this ambiguous grey area, betwixt and between being healthy and being sick, as liminal space . The aim of this article is to show how people manage the symptomless condition of elevated cholesterol in liminal space. Particular attention is paid to everyday medical reasoning in that space. Based on interviews with people with elevated cholesterol, I show that medical regimens are 'up against' - challenged by - a variety of competing conditions in everyday life, illustrating ambiguity. Facing this dilemma between medicine and everyday life, they ongoingly need to navigate - edit, modify, adjust - medical regimens against everyday conditions. This navigating work can be seen as ritualized strategies to sort ambiguity. People with elevated cholesterol do not so much act 'against medical regimens' as they simultaneously need to take account of other matters they are up against in trying to stay healthy. Medical regimens are sometimes central, sometimes peripheral. Adapting medical regimens to the situation at hand, people continuously comply with medical regimens, producing and reproducing medical regimens in moral contexts of everyday life.