1
|
Baumann S, Leão T. Industries, citizens, and non-governmental organizations' positioning and arguments used in European Union initiatives for alcohol taxation and cross-border regulation. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2024; 129:104475. [PMID: 38971018 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 04/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European region has the highest daily alcohol consumption per capita and a high alcohol-related burden of disease. Policymaking at the European Union level is open to participation by interest groups, from public health organizations to alcohol industry representatives. This study aimed to map the interest groups present in the alcohol taxation and cross-border regulation initiatives and identify which arguments were used to support positions in favor or against them. METHODS We used qualitative content analysis on the comments submitted on the official European Commission website during the 2017, 2018, 2020, and 2022 participation periods. Interest groups were characterized considering their positioning, and arguments were identified and compared by position and type of initiative. RESULTS Opponents of changes to the structures of alcohol excise duties and cross-border regulations were mostly representatives of the alcohol and agricultural industries, and the proponents were mostly health-related nongovernmental organizations. Opponents of these initiatives used a wide variety of arguments, from economic and trade to health arguments, while proponents focused mainly on health arguments, such as the effectiveness of alcohol taxation in preventing alcohol-related morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION This study highlights the wide range of arguments used by opponents around alcohol control policies, contrasting with the health-centered arguments of proponents. It further shows that there is a lobbying network at the European Union level, combining national and international representatives of industry and non-governmental organizations. These findings provide an opportunity for better preparation for upcoming discussions on alcohol control at national and regional levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selina Baumann
- EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas, n° 135, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal; Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas, n° 135, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal; Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses, e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200 Porto, Portugal
| | - Teresa Leão
- EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas, n° 135, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal; Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas, n° 135, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal; Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses, e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200 Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lesch M, McCambridge J. Continuities and change in alcohol policy at the global level: a documentary analysis of the 2010 Global Strategy for Reducing the Harmful Use of Alcohol and the Global Alcohol Action Plan 2022-2030. Global Health 2024; 20:47. [PMID: 38877515 PMCID: PMC11179290 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-024-01034-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are only two major statements which define alcohol policy development at the global level. There has not been any comparative analysis of the details of these key texts, published in 2010 and 2022 respectively, including how far they constitute similar or evolving approaches to alcohol harm. METHODS Preparatory data collection involved examination of documents associated with the final policy statements. A thematic analysis across the two policy documents was performed to generate understanding of continuity and change based on comparative study. Study findings are interpreted in the contexts of the evolving conceptual and empirical literatures. RESULTS Both documents exhibit shared guiding principles and identify similar governance challenges, albeit with varying priority levels. There is more emphasis on the high-impact interventions on price, availability and marketing in 2022, and more stringent targets have been set for 2030 in declaring alcohol as a public health priority therein, reflecting the action-oriented nature of the Plan. The identified roles of policy actors have largely remained unchanged, albeit with greater specificity in the more recent statement, appropriately so because it is concerned with implementation. The major exception, and the key difference in the documents, regards the alcohol industry, which is perceived primarily as a threat to public health in 2022 due to commercial activities harmful to health and because policy interference has slowed progress. CONCLUSIONS The adoption of the Global Alcohol Action Plan 2022-30 potentially marks a pivotal moment in global alcohol policy development, though it is unclear how fully it may be implemented. Perhaps, the key advances lie in advancing the ambitions of alcohol policy and clearly identifying that the alcohol industry should not be seen as any kind of partner in public health policymaking, which will permit progress to the extent that this influences what actually happens in alcohol policy at the national level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Lesch
- Department of Politics and International Relations, Derwent College, University of York, D/N/126, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Klingemann H, Lesch M. The confluence of legacy, corporate social responsibility, and public health: The case of Migros and alcohol-free retailing in Switzerland. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2024; 125:104333. [PMID: 38350167 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol policy studies have traditionally focused on formal policymaking processes. Retail cooperatives, however, have rarely been studied as sites of public health interventions. Migros, a cooperatively owned chain of supermarkets in Switzerland, has long forbidden alcohol sales in its supermarkets. Focusing on processes of framing, this study explores a recent unsuccessful attempt to reverse the long-standing ban via membership vote in 2022. METHODS The study draws on a range of data sources, including company documents, a televised debate, and the results of a large online survey among the general population conducted ahead of the referendum. Using thematic analysis, it investigates various campaign-related arguments, including those made by Migros management, NGOs, and other key campaign participants. RESULTS Proponents and opponents used a combination of public health, economic/market-oriented, and corporate social responsibility (CSR) frames. Migros's longstanding dedication to CSR, its participatory governance structure, and the regional political dynamics in the Swiss context are essential in understanding the nature and impact of framing. CONCLUSIONS Alcohol-related harm arises from a complex interaction between different social, political, and economic factors. Reducing harm requires approaches that consider the range of contexts and measures that can shape alcohol availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Klingemann
- Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern Academy of the Arts (HKB), Institute of Design Research (IDR) Bern Switzerland, Fellerstrasse 11, Bern, CH-3027, Switzerland.
| | - Matthew Lesch
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gage R, Connor J, Jackson N, McKerchar C, Signal L. Generating political priority for alcohol policy reform: A framework to guide advocacy and research. Drug Alcohol Rev 2024; 43:381-392. [PMID: 38017702 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While effective policies exist to reduce alcohol-related harm, political will to enact them is low in many jurisdictions. We aimed to identify key barriers and strategies for strengthening political priority for alcohol policy reform. METHODS A framework synthesis was conducted, incorporating relevant theory, key informant interviews (n = 37) and a scoping review. Thematic analysis informed the development of a framework for understanding and influencing political priority for alcohol policy. RESULTS Twelve barriers and 14 strategies were identified at multiple levels (global, national and local). Major barriers included neoliberal or free trade ideology, the globalised alcohol industry, limited advocate capacity and the normalisation of alcohol harms. Strategies fell into two categories: sector-specific and system change initiatives. Sector-specific strategies primarily focus on influencing policymakers and mobilising civil society. Examples include developing a clear, unified solution, coalition building and effective framing. System change initiatives target structural change to reduce the power imbalance between industry and civil society, such as restricting industry involvement in policymaking and securing sustainable funding for advocacy. A key example is establishing an international treaty, similar to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, to support domestic policymaking. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide a framework for understanding and advancing political priority for alcohol policy. The framework highlights that progress can be achieved at various levels and through diverse groups of actors. The importance of upstream drivers of policymaking was a key finding, presenting challenges for time-poor advocates, but offering potential facilitation through effective global leadership.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Gage
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jennie Connor
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | | - Christina McKerchar
- Department of Population Health, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Louise Signal
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
O'Brien P, Dwyer R, Gleeson D, Cook M, Room R. Influencing the global governance of alcohol: Alcohol industry views in submissions to the WHO consultation for the Alcohol Action Plan 2022-2030. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 119:104115. [PMID: 37549594 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2020, the Secretariat of the World Health Organization (WHO) conducted an open consultation, with public submissions, for the purpose of developing an Alcohol Action Plan to "strengthen implementation" of the WHO's 2010 Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol. The consultation process and public submissions provided an opportunity to critically examine alcohol industry perspectives and arguments in relation to the global governance of alcohol. METHODS 48 alcohol industry submissions to the WHO's 2020 consultation were included for analysis. Directed content analysis was used to examine the policy positions and arguments made by industry actors. Thematic analysis was employed to further explore the framing of industry arguments. RESULTS In framing their arguments, alcohol industry actors positioned themselves as important stakeholders in policy debates; differentiated "normal" drinking from consumption that merits intervention; argued that alcohol policy should be made at the national, rather than global, level; and supported industry self-regulation or co-regulation rather than cost-effective public health measures to prevent harms from alcohol. CONCLUSION The alcohol industry's submissions to the WHO's 2020 consultation could be seen as efforts to stymie improvements in the global governance of alcohol, and repeats several framing strategies that the industry has used in other forums, both national and global. However, their arguments appear to have had little traction in the creation of the Alcohol Action Plan. Changes from the Working Document to the adopted Action Plan show little acceptance by WHO of industry arguments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula O'Brien
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
| | - Robyn Dwyer
- Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3083, Australia
| | - Deborah Gleeson
- School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3083, Australia
| | - Megan Cook
- Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3083, Australia
| | - Robin Room
- Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3083, Australia; Centre for Social Research on Alcohol & Drugs, Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Matthes BK, Kumar P, Dance S, Hird T, Carriedo Lutzenkirchen A, Gilmore AB. Advocacy counterstrategies to tobacco industry interference in policymaking: a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature. Global Health 2023; 19:42. [PMID: 37344818 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-023-00936-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been remarkable tobacco control progress in many places around the globe. Tobacco industry interference (TII) has been identified as the most significant barrier to further implementation of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC). Civil society has been recognised as a key actor in countering TII. While TII has been extensively studied for several decades now, there is little research that focuses on counteractions to limit it and their effectiveness to do so. This scoping review seeks to map the peer-reviewed literature on civil society's activities of countering TII in policymaking to identify common counterstrategies and assess their effectiveness. METHODS Data sources: We searched Embase, IBSS, JSTOR, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science using the following terms: ("Tobacco industry" OR "Tobacco compan*") AND. ("corporate political activity" OR "CPA" OR "lobbying" OR "interference") AND ("advoca*" OR "counter*" OR "activi*"), without time or language restrictions. STUDY SELECTION Our selection criteria included peer-reviewed studies that were written in English, German, or Spanish that drew on primary data and/or legal and policy documents and reported at least one specific example of civil society members or organisations countering tobacco industry action-based strategies. DATA EXTRACTION Advocates' counterstrategies were analysed inductively and countered industry strategies were analysed using the Policy Dystopia Model (PDM). Perceptions of effectiveness of countering attempts were analysed descriptively. RESULTS We found five common counterstrategies among 30 included papers covering five WHO regions; 1. Exposing industry conduct and false claims; 2. Accessing decision-makers; 3. Generating and using evidence; 4. Filing a complaint or taking legal action; 5. Mobilising coalition and potential supporters. These counterstrategies were used to work against a wide range of industry strategies, which are captured by five action-based strategies described in the PDM (Coalition Management, Information Management, Direct Access and Influence, Litigation, Reputation Management). While some studies reported the outcome of the countering activities, their impact remained largely underexplored. CONCLUSION The review shows that peer-reviewed literature documenting how civil society actors counter TII is scarce. It suggests that advocates employ a range of strategies to counter TII in its different forms and use them flexibly. More work is needed to better understand the effects of their actions. This could stimulate discussions about, and facilitate learning from, past experiences and help to further enhance advocates' capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britta K Matthes
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA27AY, UK.
| | | | - Sarah Dance
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA27AY, UK
| | - Tom Hird
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA27AY, UK
| | | | - Anna B Gilmore
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA27AY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ulucanlar S, Lauber K, Fabbri A, Hawkins B, Mialon M, Hancock L, Tangcharoensathien V, Gilmore AB. Corporate Political Activity: Taxonomies and Model of Corporate Influence on Public Policy. Int J Health Policy Manag 2023; 12:7292. [PMID: 37579378 PMCID: PMC10462073 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) kill 41 million people a year. The products and services of unhealthy commodity industries (UCIs) such as tobacco, alcohol, ultra-processed foods and beverages and gambling are responsible for much of this health burden. While effective public health policies are available to address this, UCIs have consistently sought to stop governments and global organisations adopting such policies through what is known as corporate political activity (CPA). We aimed to contribute to the study of CPA and development of effective counter-measures by formulating a model and evidence-informed taxonomies of UCI political activity. METHODS We used five complementary methods: critical interpretive synthesis of the conceptual CPA literature; brief interviews; expert co-author knowledge; stakeholder workshops; testing against the literature. RESULTS We found 11 original conceptualisations of CPA; four had been used by other researchers and reported in 24 additional review papers. Combining an interpretive synthesis of all these papers and feedback from users, we developed two taxonomies - one on framing strategies and one on action strategies. The former identified three frames (policy actors, problem, and solutions) and the latter six strategies (access and influence policy-making, use the law, manufacture support for industry, shape evidence to manufacture doubt, displace, and usurp public health, manage reputations to industry's advantage). We also offer an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of UCI strategies and a model that situates industry CPA in the wider social, political, and economic context. CONCLUSION Our work confirms the similarity of CPA across UCIs and demonstrates its extensive and multi-faceted nature, the disproportionate power of corporations in policy spaces and the unacceptable conflicts of interest that characterise their engagement with policy-making. We suggest that industry CPA is recognised as a corruption of democracy, not an element of participatory democracy. Our taxonomies and model provide a starting point for developing effective solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selda Ulucanlar
- Tobacco Control Research Group (TCRG), Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Kathrin Lauber
- School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alice Fabbri
- Tobacco Control Research Group (TCRG), Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Ben Hawkins
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Melissa Mialon
- Trinity Business School, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Linda Hancock
- Alfred Deakin Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Anna B. Gilmore
- Tobacco Control Research Group (TCRG), Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sayes E, Adams PJ, Kypri K. Unpacking the differing understandings of "alcohol industry" in public health research. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 117:104056. [PMID: 37187085 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of the term 'alcohol industry' plays an important role in discussions of alcohol and public health. In this paper, we examine how the term is currently used and explore the merits of alternative conceptualisations. METHODS We start by examining current ways of referring to 'alcohol industry' in public health and then explore the potential for organisational theory, political science, and sociology to provide alcohol research with more inclusive and nuanced conceptualizations. RESULTS We identify, and critique, three conceptualisations based on purely economic understandings of industry: literal, market, and supply-chain understandings. We then examine three alternative conceptualizations based on systemic understandings of industry: organizational, social-network, and common-interest understandings. In examining these alternatives, we also identify the extent to which they open up new ways of approaching the levels at which industry influence is understood to operate in alcohol and public health research and policy. CONCLUSIONS Each of the six understandings of 'industry' can play a role in research but their utility depends on the question being asked and the breadth and depth of the analysis being undertaken. However, for those intending to engage with a broader disciplinary base, approaches grounded in the systemic understandings of 'industry' are better positioned to study the complex nexus of relationships that contribute to alcohol industry influence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin Sayes
- School of Population Health, and Centre for Addiction Research, University of Auckland, Private 92019, Auckland 1142, Aotearoa New Zealand
| | - Peter J Adams
- School of Population Health, and Centre for Addiction Research, University of Auckland, Private 92019, Auckland 1142, Aotearoa New Zealand.
| | - Kypros Kypri
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, Aotearoa New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
McCambridge J, Mitchell G, Lesch M, Filippou A, Golder S, Garry J, Bartlett A, Madden M. The emperor has no clothes: a synthesis of findings from the Transformative Research on the Alcohol industry, Policy and Science research programme. Addiction 2023; 118:558-566. [PMID: 36196477 PMCID: PMC10092733 DOI: 10.1111/add.16058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The Transformative Research on the Alcohol industry, Policy and Science (TRAPS) programme investigates the alcohol industry, with an innovative focus on public health sciences. TRAPS adds to an under-developed literature on the study of alcohol industry influence on alcohol science and policymaking. This paper provides a synthesis of TRAPS findings to inform future research. METHODS We conducted an interpretive review of TRAPS research findings across its component studies, identifying and integrating the key contributions made by individual studies to the literature on alcohol policymaking and science, and identifying areas where TRAPS progress was limited. This produced themes for consideration in future research agenda setting. RESULTS TRAPS explored the interventions of the alcohol industry in science and policymaking using various methods, including systematic reviews and qualitative interviews. These studies identified the industry's activities in several key areas, such as the debate over minimum unit pricing (MUP), cardiovascular health and alcohol research and a long-running public relations programme developed in close connection with the tobacco industry. Collectively, the research shows that alcohol policymaking has involved a contest between the research community and alcohol industry actors about whether and how science should be used to inform policy. CONCLUSIONS The TRAPS programme demonstrates the need for a transdisciplinary approach to understand the nature of corporate political activity; the crucial role industry involvement in science plays in the development of corporate political power; and how public health actors have successfully overcome industry opposition to evidence-based policies. Advances in alcohol policy should be underpinned by strong, reflexive public health sciences, alert to the role of industry in the alcohol harms under study and thorough in their investigation of the alcohol industry as an object of study in itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim McCambridge
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkHeslingtonYorkUK
| | - Gemma Mitchell
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkHeslingtonYorkUK
| | - Matthew Lesch
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkHeslingtonYorkUK
| | | | - Su Golder
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkHeslingtonYorkUK
| | - Jack Garry
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkHeslingtonYorkUK
| | - Andrew Bartlett
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkHeslingtonYorkUK
| | - Mary Madden
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkHeslingtonYorkUK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Barry RA. 'We never thought this would be considered drug trafficking': International finance rules, policy space and Uruguay's regulation of recreational cannabis. Glob Public Health 2023; 18:2283042. [PMID: 37970837 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2023.2283042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACTFollowing landmark legislation in 2013, Uruguay became the first country to regulate the legal production, distribution and sale of recreational cannabis. While broader debates anticipated the significance of the UN drug conventions, the extent to which Uruguay's drug treaty obligations shaped regulation is unclear and the relevance of finance norms has been neglected. Drawing on institutionalist and governance theories, this study explores how international drug and finance regulations limited Uruguay's policy space to implement cannabis regulation, and how this was perceived by policy actors. Policy documents and 43 semi-structured interviews were thematically analysed. The analysis demonstrates how Uruguay's drug treaty obligations were less directly constraining to policy space compared to international finance norms, including the US Patriot Act, anti-money laundering standards and financial inclusion practices. Such norms exerted powerful influence over Uruguay's ability to implement aspects of cannabis supply that interact with broader financial systems, allowing banks to terminate business relationships with clients deemed as high risks for money laundering. The Uruguayan case suggests that financial regulations at diverse levels are likely to constrain policy space in other contexts where the market-based policies of cannabis regulation raise tensions with a narrowly constructed risk management principle in approaches to financial supply.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Ann Barry
- Tobacco Control Research Group, University of Bath, Bath, UK
- Global Health Policy Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Shaping Public Health Policies to Reduce Inequalities and Harm, SPECTRUM Consortium, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
McCambridge J, Garry J, Kypri K, Hastings G. "Using information to shape perception": tobacco industry documents study of the evolution of Corporate Affairs in the Miller Brewing Company. Global Health 2022; 18:52. [PMID: 35597943 PMCID: PMC9123667 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-022-00843-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Miller Brewing Company (MBC) was wholly owned by Phillip Morris (PM), between 1970 and 2002. Tobacco industry document studies identify alliances between the alcohol and tobacco industries to counter U.S. policies in the 1980s and 1990s. This investigation sought to study in-depth inter-relationships between MBC and PM, with a particular focus on alcohol policy issues. We used the Truth Tobacco Industry Documents library to trace the evolution of corporate affairs and related alcohol policy orientated functions within and between MBC and PM. RESULTS MBC was structured and led by PM senior executives from soon after takeover in 1970. Corporate Affairs sought to influence public perceptions of alcohol to align them with business interests. Alcohol education was specifically designed to prevent the adoption of policies inimical to those interests (e.g., raising excise taxes). Strategic consideration of alcohol policy issues was integrated within company-wide thinking, which sought to apply lessons from tobacco to alcohol and vice versa. PM directly led key alcohol industry organisations nationally and globally, which have successfully delayed the adoption and implementation of known effective policy measures in the U.S. and worldwide. CONCLUSIONS PM has been a key architect of alcohol industry political strategies. This study builds on earlier work on alcohol companies in the tobacco documents, and offers historical data on how tobacco companies have used commercial involvements in other sectors to influence wider public health policy. We are only beginning to appreciate how multi-sectoral companies internally develop political strategies across product categories. Global health and national governmental policy-making needs to be better protected from business interests that fundamentally conflict with public health goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim McCambridge
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Jack Garry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
McCambridge J, Madden M. Think big about developing the science. Addiction 2021; 116:2947-2948. [PMID: 34060152 PMCID: PMC8650571 DOI: 10.1111/add.15568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary Madden
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lesch M, McCambridge J. Policy communities, devolution and policy transfer: The case of alcohol pricing in Wales. REGIONAL & FEDERAL STUDIES 2021; 33:163-185. [PMID: 37082296 PMCID: PMC10108489 DOI: 10.1080/13597566.2021.1934454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
This study investigates how processes of horizontal policy transfer can unfold in the context of devolution, examining the development of legislation on minimum unit pricing (MUP) in Wales, following on from Scotland's earlier policy decision. The study draws on a range of sources, including primary documents, media coverage, and interviews with policy participants. Our analysis identifies the importance of the specific character of Welsh political institutions, particularly the emphasis given to participation and consultation in policymaking. In the case of MUP, we document a process of policy-oriented learning, where policymakers made a concerted effort to draw on an assortment of expertise and experiences, including but not limited to the Scottish model. We also find that the Welsh public health policy community was well placed to support the framing of MUP and to address limitations in policy capacity. The findings hold implications for future studies of learning, devolution, and alcohol policy more generally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Lesch
- Department of Health Sciences, Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, York, UK
| | - Jim McCambridge
- Department of Health Sciences, Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|