A retrospective chart analysis with 5-year follow-up of early care for geriatric hip fracture patients: why we should continue talking about hip fractures

BACKGROUND

Timing of surgery remains a topic of debate for hip fracture treatment in the geriatric patient population. The quality indicator "early surgery" was implemented in 2014 at the Department of Trauma Surgery of the University Hospitals Leuven to enhance timely operative treatment. In this follow-up study, we aim to evaluate the performance of this quality indicator, the clinical outcomes, and room for improvement.

METHODS

The charts of 1190 patients surgically treated for an acute hip fracture were reviewed between June 2017 and May 2022 at the University Hospitals Leuven. Primary endpoints were adherence to early surgery, defined as surgery within the next calendar day, and the evaluation of the reasons for deviating from this protocol. Secondary endpoints were length of stay (LOS); intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length of ICU stay; mortality after 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, and 6 months; and 90-day readmission rate. Pearson's Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

One thousand eighty-four (91.1%) patients received early surgery versus 106 (8.9%) patients who received delayed surgery. The main reasons for surgical delay were the use of anticoagulants (33%), a general health condition not allowing safe surgery and/or existing comorbidities requiring workup prior to surgery (26.4%), and logistical reasons (17.9%). Patient delay and transfer from other hospitals were responsible for respectively 8.5% and 6.6% of delayed surgery. Early surgery resulted in a significantly shorter LOS and ICU stay (12 [8-25] vs. 18 [10-36] and 3 [2-6] vs. 7 [3-13] days, early vs. delayed surgery, respectively). No significant reduction was observed in ICU admission, mortality, and readmission rate.

CONCLUSION

We have been able to maintain the early surgery hip fracture protocol in approximately 90% of the patients. Comorbidities and anticoagulant use were responsible for delayed surgery in the majority of the patients. Correct implementation of the existing protocol on anticoagulant use could lead to a one-third decrease in the number of delayed surgeries. Subsequently, since the LOS and ICU stay in the delayed surgery group were significantly longer, a further increase of early surgery will lower the current economic burden.

Complications of Hip Hemiarthroplasty

Hip hemiarthroplasty is a commonly performed orthopedic surgery, used to treat proximal femur fractures in the elderly population. Although hip hemiarthroplasty is frequently successful in addressing these injuries, complications can occur. Commonly seen complications include dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, acetabular erosion, and leg-length inequality. Less frequently seen complications include neurovascular injury and capsular interposition. This article presents a comprehensive review of the complications associated with the management of hip hemiarthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(4):e199-e209.].

Dislocation rate, revisions and other complications of primary cemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a single-center cohort study of 743 unselected hips with a mean 2.7-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Evidence of whether to use hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) is still widely debated, especially when taking ambulatory status, age, and patient cognitive status into account. The current study aims to report the rates of dislocations, revisions and other complications for primary cemented HA in patients with displaced FNF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single-center retrospective follow-up study of an unselected historic cohort. 743 consecutive hips (551 W and 192 M) at mean (SD) age of 83.6 (8.4) years received primary cemented HA for displaced FNF by posterolateral surgical approach between January 2012 and December 2019. Patient files and radiographs were evaluated for dislocations, revisions, and other complications until death or end of the follow-up period, and the educational level of the surgeon was noted.

RESULTS

During a mean (SD) follow-up period of 2.7 (2.2) years, there were 6.1% (n = 45) dislocations, in which 82% (first dislocation) appeared within the first 30 postoperative days, and 51% (n = 23) of the dislocations requiring subsequent surgery. At the time of the last available follow-up, 57% (n = 421) of the patients were dead. A non-dislocation related revision was needed in 3.4% (n = 25) of the patients [in which infection accounted for 40% (n = 10) and traumatic periprosthetic fracture for 32% (n = 8)]. Thirty-day mortality was 9.2% and 1-year mortality 25.8%. There were no differences in patient's age, gender, or educational level of the surgeon between the dislocation and the no dislocation groups. Patients aged < 70 years presented with a higher dislocation rate (p < 0.001) than the patients aged > 70 years.

CONCLUSION

Primary HA presents a safe and robust approach with acceptable complication rates in a genuine unselected cohort of displaced FNF, particularly for patients aged > 70.

Mortality following surgery for geriatric hip fractures: is it the timing or the co-morbidities?

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are prevalent in the elderly population and present serious health, social and economic problems, with an impact on morbidity and mortality. Today, it is common practice to surgically repair these fractures as early as possible, preferably within 48 hours of hospital admission. However, there is conflicting evidence in the literature about the effect of the timing of surgery on postoperative mortality.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the association between surgery delay and other demographic and clinical variables with an increased mortality rate after surgical treatment of hip fractures in the elderly.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients aged ⩾65 years with a primary diagnosis of hip fracture. All patients underwent surgery in our Medical Center from 2015 to 2017. A multivariate model of logistic regression, Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between various variables and mortality rates at 3- and 12-month follow-ups.

RESULTS

A total of 877 patients were included, 30% were men and 70% women; the mean age was 83.3 years. Multivariate analysis showed that mortality was significantly higher among patients who underwent late surgery, after adjusting for gender, age, co-morbidity, age of surgeon, duration of surgery and duration of hospitalisation (p = 0.030). Surgical delay was significantly associated with higher mortality rates both at 3 month (p = 0.041) and at 12 months after surgery (p = 0.013). The presence of ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and chronic renal failure, as well as male gender and older age, were also significantly associated with higher early and late mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly patients, hip fracture surgery should be performed within 48 hours of admission. Male and older patients, as well as patients with the aforementioned co-morbidities, are at higher risk of mortality at 3 and 12 months after surgery.

MORTALITY IN PATIENTS > 90 YEARS OLD WITH PROXIMAL FEMORAL FRACTURES SUBJECTED TO SURGERY

ABSTRACT Introduction: Proximal femoral fractures have a high mortality rate among older adults, especially those aged > 80 years. Objective: To analyze predictive factors for hospital or late mortality of patients > 90 years old who showed proximal femoral fracture and subjected to surgery. Methods: The study included data from 230 patients aged > 90 years diagnosed with proximal femoral fracture and who underwent surgery between January and December 2017. The statistical evaluation was performed by multivariate analysis by a logistic regression. The associations were estimated by the odds ratio (OD) and confidence interval (95%). Statistical significance was determined with p < 0.05. Results: Late death occurred in 51.3% (118 patients) of the sample and hospital death in 3.5% (8 patients). Most patients were women (83.5%) and the most common fracture was transtrochanteric (57.0%). There was association between late death and the surgery duration (p < 0.05), and between hospital death and the presence of heart diseases (p < 0.05) or endocrinopathies (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Most patients aged > 90 years with proximal femoral fracture subjected to surgery died in less than one year. Late death was associated with the surgery duration and hospital death was associated with the presence of previous endocrinopathies or heart diseases, and the female gender was a protective factor from this outcome. Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures in patients aged 90 years or older: A bi-centre study comparing 209 patients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of unipolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasty to treat hip fractures in patients aged ≥ 90 years.

METHODS

We conducted this study from 2007 to 2018 based on the electronic databases of two hospitals. Patients aged ≥ 90 years, treated for Arbeitsgemeinschaft Osteosynthese 31-B3 type fractures, were included. One hospital conducted the treatment only with unipolar prostheses; the other hospital used only bipolar prostheses. We assessed 23 peri‑ and postoperative variables including any revision, dislocation, and survival. The follow-up was completed after a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. At follow-up, the functional status was evaluated via telephone using the Parker score for every living patient.

RESULTS

One-hundred unipolar prostheses, and 109 bipolar prostheses were examined. The patients' mean age was 92.9 years (range 90-102). Dementia was differently distributed between the groups (p < 0.001), with a lower survival risk (Odds Ratio 1.908; Confidence Interval 1.392 - 2.615; log rank <0.001). Based on this result, unipolar demonstrated significantly higher mortality rates compared with bipolar prostheses (log rank < 0.001). No effects were found for dislocation, revision and overall complication rate. At follow-up, 37 patients were available for functional status. The mean Parker score was 3.7 (range 0-9), with no effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracapsular hip fractures in patients aged ≥ 90 years can be treated with unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty. The type of prostheses did not influence dislocation, revision, general complication, or functional status. The groups were significantly affected by dementia, a risk factor for shorter survival.

Hip hemiarthroplasty with modular neck: is it useful in residents' learning curve? A prospective clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The number of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) worldwide will drastically increase in the next few decades, reaching 6.3 million by 2050. In the future, therefore, newly-qualified orthopaedic surgeons will treat this kind of injury more frequently than in past decades. This prospective observational study aims to assess whether hip hemiarthroplasty with modular neck, performed via the Hardinge approach, can be safely carried out by orthopaedic residents.

METHODS

Patients referred to our Level I trauma centre, between January 2016 and June 2017, with displaced intra-articular femoral fractures, were prospectively recruited. All patients underwent cemented modular bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty (Profemur Z, MicroPort Orthopedics Inc., Arlington, TN, USA) via the Hardinge approach, with the patient positioned in lateral decubitus. The surgical procedures were performed by the same surgical and anesthesiology team, under spinal anaesthesia. All patients underwent clinical and radiographic follow-up up to 24 months. Complications and re-operations were recorded. Clinical evaluation was performed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire QUALEFFO-41 and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire. Anteroposterior pelvis x-rays were performed preoperatively, postoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up.

RESULTS

118 patients met the inclusion criteria (male: 50; female: 68; mean age: 74.3 years; range 65-88 years) and were included in the current study. 67 patients out of 118 (56.8%) were managed by senior orthopaedic surgeons (Group A), whereas the remaining 51 patients out of 118 (43.2%) were treated by orthopaedic residents (Group B). Hip hemiarthroplasties performed by senior surgeons showed the prevalent use of straight (short or long) necks, whereas, in surgical procedures performed by residents, there was a significantly higher use of varus/valgus, anteverted or retroverted necks. The overall complication rate was significantly higher in Group-B patients, compared with Group-A patients (p = 0.002). The length of hospital stay and the mean clinical scores at 24 months follow-up showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip hemiarthroplasty with modular neck can be safely employed during the learning curve of orthopaedic residents. Great efforts, however, should be made in future to improve residents' training in the management of FNFs.

Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: Does Surgeon Subspecialty Affect Perioperative Outcomes?

OBJECTIVES

To determine if surgeon subspecialty training affects perioperative outcomes for displaced femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

SETTING

One health system with 2 hospitals (Level I and Level III trauma centers).

PATIENT AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients who were treated with hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures between October 2012 and September 2017.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Leg length discrepancy, femoral offset, estimated blood loss (EBL), incidence of blood transfusion, time to surgery, operative time, and length of stay. Data were analyzed based on the treating surgeon's subspecialty training [arthroplasty (A), trauma (T), other (O)]. Hierarchical regression was used to compare the groups and control for confounding variables.

RESULTS

A total of 292 patients who received hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures were included (A = 158; T = 73; O = 61). Surgeon subspecialty had a statistically significant effect on operative time, with arthroplasty surgeons completing the procedure 9.6 minutes faster than trauma surgeons and 17.7 minutes faster than other surgeons (P < 0.01; ΔR = 0.03). Surgeon subspecialty did not significantly affect other outcomes, including leg length discrepancy (P = 0.26), femoral offset (P = 0.37), EBL (P = 0.10), incidence of transfusion (P = 0.67), time to surgery (P = 0.10), or length of stay (P = 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that arthroplasty-trained surgeons perform hemiarthroplasty slightly faster than other subspecialists, but subspecialty training does not affect other perioperative outcomes, including leg length discrepancy, femoral offset, EBL, transfusion rate, time to surgery, or length of stay. This suggests that hemiarthroplasty can be adequately performed by various subspecialists, and deferring treatment to an arthroplasty surgeon might not have a clinically significant benefit in the perioperative period.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Mortality and comorbidity after non-operatively managed, low-energy pelvic fracture in patients over age 70: a comparison with an age-matched femoral neck fracture cohort and general population

Background

Research on mortality and comorbidity associated with pelvic fractures in older patients is scarce. We aimed to determine the short- and long-term mortality rates of older patients with a pelvic ring fracture compared with both an age-matched cohort of patients with a femoral neck fracture and a general population, and to investigate 30- and 60-day readmission rates after pelvic fracture.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study done in an emergency department of a level II/III trauma center. All patients aged over 70 years diagnosed with a pelvic or acetabular fracture between January 2010 and December 2016 in our ED were identified. Two reference populations were used: patients operated due to femoral neck fracture in our institution between 2007 and 2008 and a general population aged 70 years or more.

Results

Two hundred nineteen patients were identified. 30- and 90-day mortality was 7.3 and 11.4%, respectively. Compared to the general population, a pelvic fracture was associated with an 8.5-fold (95% CI: 5.2–13.9) and 11.0-fold (95% CI: 5.4–22.3) 90-day mortality risk in females and males, respectively. We could not observe a difference in the risk of 90-day mortality between femoral neck fracture patients and patients with a pelvic fracture. Within 30 days, 28 (12.8%) pelvic fracture patients were readmitted for in-patient care in our hospital.

Conclusions

The mortality of older patients with pelvic ring fractures resembles that after hip fracture. Although older patients with a pelvic ring fracture rarely require operative treatment, the severity of the injury should not be considered as a class apart from hip fracture.