Disparities in computed tomography utilization for pediatric blunt trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pediatric and non-pediatric trauma centers

Pediatric blunt trauma is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and computed tomography (CT) imaging is vital for accurate evaluation and management. Pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) have selective CT practices, while non-PTCs may differ, resulting in potential variations in CT utilization. The objective of this study is to delineate disparities in CT utilization for pediatric blunt trauma patients between PTCs and non-PTCs. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following established guidelines, searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to March 3, 2023. All studies examining CT utilization in the management of pediatric (aged < 21 years) blunt trauma and specifying the type of trauma center(s) were included, and data were extracted and analyzed using STATA software version 17.0. An analysis of 30 studies revealed significant variations in CT scan utilization among pediatric blunt trauma patients across different types of trauma centers. PTCs exhibited lower pooled rates of abdominopelvic CT scans (35.4% vs. 44.9%, p < 0.01), cranial CT scans (36.9% vs. 42.9%, p < 0.01), chest CT scans (14.5% vs. 25.4%, p < 0.01), and cervical spine CT scans (23% vs. 45%, p < 0.01) compared to adult or mixed trauma centers (ATCs/MTCs). PTCs had a pooled rate of 54% for receiving at least one CT scan, while ATCs/MTCs had a higher rate of 69.3% (p < 0.05). The studies demonstrated considerable heterogeneity. These findings underscore the need to conduct further research to understand the reasons for the observed variations and to promote appropriate imaging usage, minimize radiation exposure, and encourage collaboration between pediatric and adult trauma centers.

Sustaining the gains: Reducing unnecessary computed tomography scans in pediatric trauma patients

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

"Pan-scanning" pediatric blunt trauma patients leads to exposure to harmful radiation and increased healthcare costs without improving outcomes. We aimed to reduce computed tomography (CT) scans that are not indicated (NI) by imaging guidelines for injured children.

METHODS

In July 2017, our Pediatric Trauma Center prospectively implemented validated imaging guidelines to direct CT imaging for trauma activations and consultations for children younger than 16 years old with blunt traumatic injuries. Patients with suspected physical abuse, CT imaging prior to arrival, penetrating mechanism, and instability precluding CT imaging were excluded. We compared CT scanning rates for pre-implementation (01/2016-06/2017) and post-implementation (07/2017-08/2021) time periods. Guideline compliance was evaluated by chart review and sustained through iterative process improvement cycles.

RESULTS

During the pre-implementation era, 61 patients underwent 171 CT scans of which 87 (51%) scans were not indicated by guidelines. Post-implementation, 363 patients had 531 scans and only 134 (25%) CTs were not indicated. Total CTs performed declined after initiation of guidelines (2.80 vs 1.46 scans/patient, p<0.0001). Total NI CTs declined (1.41 vs 0.37 NI scans/patient, p<0.0001) reflected in significant reductions in all anatomic regions: head, cervical spine, chest, and abdomen/pelvis. Charges related to NI scans decreased from $1,490.31/patient to $408.21/patient, saving $218,000 in charges. Based on prior utilization, 146 children were spared excessive radiation with no clinically significant missed injuries since guideline implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality improvement and implementation science methodologies to enhance compliance with imaging guidelines for children with blunt injuries can significantly reduce unnecessary CT scanning without compromising care. This practice reduces harmful radiation exposure in a sensitive patient population and may save healthcare systems money and resources.

Application of a Thoracic CT Decision Rule in the Evaluation of Injured Children: A Quality Improvement Initiative

BACKGROUND

Differences in injury patterns in children suggest that life-threatening chest injuries are rare. Radiation exposure from computed tomography increases cancer risk in children. Two large retrospective pediatric studies have demonstrated that thoracic computed tomography can be reserved for patients based on mechanism of injury and abnormal findings on chest radiography.

OBJECTIVE

Implement a decision rule to guide utilization of thoracic computed tomography in the evaluation of pediatric blunt trauma, limiting risk of unnecessary radiation exposure and clinically significant missed injuries.

METHODS

A protocol for thoracic computed tomography utilization in pediatric blunt trauma was implemented using a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle at our Level I pediatric trauma center, reserving thoracic computed tomography for patients with (1) mediastinal widening on chest radiography or (2) vehicle-related mechanism and abnormal chest radiography. We modified our resuscitation order set to limit default imaging bundles. The medical record and trauma registry data were reviewed for all pediatric blunt trauma patients (younger than 18 years) over a 30-month study period before and after protocol implementation (May 2017 to July 2018 and February 2019 to April 2020), allowing for a 6-month implementation period (August 2018 to January 2019).

RESULTS

During the study period, 1,056 blunt trauma patients were evaluated with a median (range) Injury Severity Score of 5 (0-58). There were no significant demographic differences between patients before and after protocol implementation. Thoracic computed tomography utilization significantly decreased after implementation of the protocol (26.4% [129/488] to 12.7% [72/568; p < .05]), with no increase in clinically significant missed injuries. Protocol compliance was 88%.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of decision rules can safely limit ionizing radiation in injured children. Further limitations to thoracic computed tomography utilization may be safe and warrant continued study due to the rarity of significant injuries.