Is continued weight gain inevitable in type 2 diabetes mellitus?

Glimepiride: evidence-based facts, trends, and observations (GIFTS). [corrected]

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterized by insulin resistance and progressive β cell failure; therefore, β cell secretagogues are useful for achieving sufficient glycemic control. Glimepiride is a second-generation sulfonylurea that stimulates pancreatic β cells to release insulin. Additionally, is has been shown to work via several extra pancreatic mechanisms. It is administered as monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in whom glycemic control is not achieved by dietary and lifestyle modifications. It can also be combined with other antihyperglycemic agents, including metformin and insulin, in patients who are not adequately controlled by sulfonylureas alone. The effective dosage range is 1 to 8 mg/day; however, there is no significant difference between 4 and 8 mg/day, but it should be used with caution in the elderly and in patients with renal or hepatic disease. In clinical studies, glimepiride was generally associated with lower risk of hypoglycemia and less weight gain compared to other sulfonylureas. Glimepiride use may be safer in patients with cardiovascular disease because of its lack of detrimental effects on ischemic preconditioning. It is effective in reducing fasting plasma glucose, post-prandial glucose, and glycosylated hemoglobin levels and is a useful, cost-effective treatment option for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Antidiabetic medications and weight gain: implications for the practicing physician

Obesity is a major risk factor for diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and most people with diabetes are overweight or obese. Weight reduction has been shown to improve glycemic control and reduce cardiovascular risk in the diabetic population. While physicians strive to achieve better glycemic control for their patients with diabetes, they are faced with the problem of weight gain that is commonly encountered with the use of antidiabetic agents, particularly insulin, insulin secretagogues, and thiazolidinediones. Weight gain in this population could offset the beneficial effects of good glycemic control and discourage patients from adhering to treatment. In this review, we discuss the effects of the various antidiabetic agents on body weight, highlighting the potential mechanisms and the implications of weight gain in this population. We also present the available therapeutic modalities that have the potential of achieving better glycemic control without adverse effects on body weight.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages of insulin analogues and premixed insulin analogues over human insulins: impact on efficacy and safety

Human insulin preparations administered to patients with diabetes mellitus fail to reproduce the normal physiologic pattern of insulin secretion. Modifications have been made in the amino acid sequence of the insulin molecule with the aim of overcoming the pharmacokinetic shortcomings of human insulins. Such modifications have produced long-acting analogues, with relatively flat time-action profiles, for controlling glycemic levels between meals; and rapid-acting analogues with a fast onset and short duration of action, for controlling postprandial hyperglycemia. Premixed formulations of the rapid-acting analogues, containing both rapid-acting soluble and intermediate-acting protaminated forms, are also available. Trials of long-acting insulin analogues have consistently shown efficacy in controlling fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), as well as a markedly reduced risk of hypoglycemia compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin. The rapid-acting and premixed analogues offer better control of postprandial glucose excursions than do regular human insulin, resulting in similar or lower HbA1c levels. Furthermore, the analogues can offer patients greater flexibility and more convenience in administration compared with human insulins. This review provides an overview of the insulin analogues available today and describes their structure, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety.

Defining the role of insulin detemir in Basal insulin therapy

Insulin detemir is a novel long-acting insulin analogue with a unique mechanism underlying its prolonged duration of action. Unlike neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin (insulin suspension isophane) and insulin glargine, which precipitate after administration, insulin detemir remains soluble after it is injected. The prolonged duration of action of insulin detemir is a result of the ability to self-associate into hexamers and dihexamers, and to bind reversibly to albumin. This mechanism of protraction provides a more prolonged, consistent and predictable glycaemic effect in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus compared with NPH insulin. Clinical studies have demonstrated that insulin detemir administered once or twice daily is at least as effective as NPH insulin and insulin glargine in achieving glycaemic control. Most trials have also shown that insulin detemir exhibits less intrapatient variability in glycaemic control compared with NPH insulin and insulin glargine. One of the benefits of insulin detemir is its favourable effect on bodyweight. Insulin detemir has shown weight neutrality in patients with type 1 diabetes and is associated with less weight gain than NPH insulin in clinical studies. Patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin detemir gain less weight than patients using NPH insulin and insulin glargine. In addition, a reduced risk of hypoglycaemia, particularly nocturnal hypoglycaemia, has been reported with insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. A reduced risk of major and nocturnal hypoglycaemia compared with insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes has also been observed. Together, these data indicate that insulin detemir is a valuable new option for basal insulin therapy in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

A review of the effects of antihyperglycaemic agents on body weight: the potential of incretin targeted therapies

BACKGROUND

Current American Diabetes Association (ADA)/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) treatment guidelines recommend metformin (which does not promote weight gain) as the first-line antihyperglycaemic drug for patients with type 2 diabetes. However, when metformin fails, the recommended add-on treatment options (sulphonylureas, glitazones and basal insulin) can lead to significant weight gain. This article reviews the effect on body weight of current treatments for type 2 diabetes and discusses the potential impact of weight gain in this patient group.

SCOPE

MEDLINE searches were performed to evaluate the prevalence and impact of changes in body weight in type 2 diabetes (articles published between January 1966 and August 2006) and the effects of sulphonylureas, glitazones, insulin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and incretin analogs on body weight in these patients (search between January 2004 and September 2006).

FINDINGS

Weight gain in general affects not only the physiological capability of patients with diabetes to achieve glycaemic control, but also their psychological well-being, quality of life and persistence with antihyperglycaemic treatment. Excess body weight and obesity in patients with diabetes are also associated with increased healthcare resource utilisation. Development of obesity is also associated with increased cardiovascular risk, although a link between drug-induced weight gain per se and increased cardiovascular risk has not been established. Initial clinical trial experience with the new oral DPP-4 inhibitors such as sitagliptin and vildagliptin suggests that these agents are weight-neutral, while providing improved glycaemic control when added to metformin.

CONCLUSIONS

Because currently available add-on treatments can cause weight gain, physicians initiating add-on therapy in patients who can no longer achieve glycaemic control with metformin are faced with the problem of improving glycaemic control while causing weight gain. Initial clinical trial experience with oral DPP-4 inhibitors such as sitagliptin and vildagliptin suggest that these agents may represent an important oral treatment option for weight-neutral, glycaemic control when added to metformin. The new oral DPP-4 inhibitors, therefore, represent a potentially important addition to the oral treatment options currently available for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Long-term clinical trials are now required to evaluate the relative risk/benefit profile of these drugs compared with the established antihyperglycaemic drug classes.

Tratamiento de los pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en atención primaria en España

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We assess the metabolic control, complications, quality of life related to health (QLRH) and the type and amount of medical resource consumption (MRC) in type 2 diabetic patients (2DMp) followed by primary care physicians (PCP) in Spain.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We studied 628 2DMp divided in 4 cohorts: 1. Either newly diagnosed 2DMp who required pharmacological treatment or failed to non-pharmacological measures; 2. Patients pharmacologically treated for less than 1 year; 3. Patients with pharmacological treatment for more than 1 year; 4. Patients with impaired fasting glucose (control group).

RESULTS

Eighty percent of the subjects were overweight. At baseline, 27.9, 23.5 and 36.9% of patients from cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively, had HbA1C < 8%. After 6 months of follow-up, 14.6, 21.3 and 22.8% of patients from cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively, still had "bad control". At baseline, 38.0%, 21.2% and 20.7% of patients from cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively, had "bad lipid profile". After 6 months, 57.4%, 54.2% and 45.3% of cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively, still had plasma cLDL levels > 130 mg/dl. Complications were more frequent in cohort 3. During the 6-month period, MRC was higher among 2DMp than controls (p < 0.05) and higher among patients from cohort 3 (p < 0.05) compared with all the other patients. More diabetic than control patients and more patients from cohort 3 than patients from cohort 1 and 2 reported that their expected quality of life would be better without diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

One out of four of diabetic patients studied had HbA1C and lipids higher than the limits suggested by guidelines. Type 2 diabetes is associated with higher MRC and worse QLRH. This situation is worse among long-term diabetic patients.

At last, a weight neutral insulin?

In the treatment of diabetes, the positive correlation between weight gain and glycaemic control is well known. Inappropriate weight gain has been demonstrated in landmark diabetes studies, with insulin or oral antidiabetic drugs. Weight increase is associated with accelerated deterioration in beta-cell function in type II diabetes, and increases in hypertension and lipid levels in both type I and type II diabetes. Concerns about increasing weight may be a barrier to initiation or to intensification of insulin therapy. Insulin introduction may be delayed in type II diabetes, and patients may under-dose their insulin to avoid gaining weight. Insulin detemir is a new long-acting soluble insulin analogue where protraction is achieved by reversible binding to albumin. As a result, it has consistent absorption and low variability from injection to injection. Studies of insulin detemir in basal-bolus regimens in type I and type II diabetes have shown significantly less weight gain compared with NPH. There is speculation about potential mechanisms for these outcomes and results from ongoing investigations are awaited. The insulin detemir data suggest that weight gain with insulin therapy is not inevitable. The potential therefore exists for improving glycaemic control while maintaining weight stability, resulting in immediate and long-term benefits for patients.

Change in patients' body weight after 12 months of treatment with glimepiride or glibenclamide in Type 2 diabetes: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Our study compared the effects of glimepiride or glibenclamide treatment on body weight over 12 months of treatment in patients with Type 2 diabetes in routine outpatient practice.

METHODS

This new retrospective study design used data from physicians in a restricted manner (retrolective). Data from case report forms from 520 patients from 91 randomly selected centres were assessed and covariance analysis performed.

RESULTS

The influence of practice and patient characteristics on treatment assignment was low, reflecting the design of randomised controlled trials. Mean weight loss and reduction in body mass index from baseline to study endpoint were greater with glimepiride than with glibenclamide (-2.04+/-3.99 kg vs -0.58+/-3.65 kg, p<0.001; -0.71+/-1.38 kg/m(2) vs -0.20+/-1.28 kg/m(2), p<0.001). Duration of treatment at baseline influenced treatment outcome, but propensity score, sex, age and fasting blood glucose at baseline did not. Both glimepiride and glibenclamide led to decreases in fasting blood glucose (-2.43+/-0.24 mmol/l vs -3.03+/-0.24 mmol/l; p<0.001 vs baseline) and HbA(1c) (-1.23+/-0.09% vs -1.26+/-0.09%; p<0.001 vs baseline). Both treatments were associated with a decrease in serum total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol. Triglycerides were lower in the glibenclamide group and high density lipoprotein cholesterol was higher in the glimepiride group only.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Initial treatment of Type 2 diabetes with glimepiride was associated with a significantly greater decrease in body weight and body mass index than treatment with glibenclamide, while providing equivalent glycaemic control.

The effects of orlistat on body weight and glycaemic control in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

AIM

To assess the long-term effects of orlistat on body weight, glycaemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled study with a 4-week placebo plus diet lead-in period and a 48-week, double-blind treatment period. Overweight or obese adults [body mass index (BMI) >or= 28 kg/m2] with HbA1c of 6.5-11% and clinical type 2 diabetes were randomized to orlistat (120 mg t.i.d. n = 189) or placebo (n = 180) in conjunction with a low-calorie diet. Patients had either received sulphonylurea therapy for at least 2 months before the study or were not receiving any antidiabetic medication (the majority of which were drug-naïve).

RESULTS

After 1 year, patients in the orlistat group lost significantly more weight than patients in the placebo group (-5.4% vs. -3.6%; p = 0.006). Moreover, significantly more patients achieved weight loss of >or= 5% with orlistat compared with placebo (51.3% vs. 31.6%; p = 0.0001). Patients treated with orlistat also had significantly greater improvements than placebo-treated patients in HbA1c (-0.9% vs. -0.4%; p < 0.001), fasting glucose (-1.6 vs.-0.7 mmol/l; p = 0.004) and post-prandial glucose (-1.8 vs. -0.5 mmol/l; p = 0.003). In addition, orlistat-treated patients had a significantly greater reduction in LDL cholesterol compared with placebo. Overall, orlistat had a similar safety profile to placebo, with the exception of a higher incidence of generally mild and transient gastrointestinal events known to be associated with the mode of action of orlistat.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with orlistat plus diet resulted in significant weight loss, improved glycaemic control and cardiovascular risk factor profile in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes.