Unique Pharmacological Properties of α-Conotoxin OmIA at α7 nAChRs

OmIA, isolated from Conus omaria venom, is a potent antagonist at α7 nAChRs. We determined the co-crystal structure of OmIA with Lymnae stagnalis acetylcholine binding protein (Ls-AChBP) that identified His5, Val10 and Asn11 as key determinants for the high potency of OmIA at α7 nAChRs. Remarkably, despite a competitive binding mode observed in the co-crystal structure, OmIA and analogues displayed functional insurmountable antagonism at α7 and α3β4 nAChRs, except OmIA analogues having long side chain at position 10 ([V10Q]OmIA and [V10L]OmIA), which were partial insurmountable antagonist at α7 nAChRs in the presence of type II positive allosteric modulators (PAMs). A “two-state, two-step” model was used to explain these observations, with [V10Q]OmIA and [V10L]OmIA co-existing in a fast reversible/surmountable as well as a tight binding/insurmountable state. OmIA and analogues also showed biphasic-inhibition at α7 nAChRs in the presence of PNU120596, with a preference for the high-affinity binding site following prolonged exposure. The molecular basis of binding and complex pharmacological profile of OmIA at α7 nAChRs presented in here expands on the potential of α-conotoxins to probe the pharmacological properties of nAChRs and may help guide the development novel α7 modulators.

Sartan-AT1 receptor interactions: in vitro evidence for insurmountable antagonism and inverse agonism

Sartans are non-peptide AT(1) receptor antagonists used to treat hypertension and related pathologies. Their effects on the G protein-dependent responses of angiotensin II (Ang II) were the same in vascular tissues and in isolated cell systems. All are competitive but, when pre-incubated, they act surmountably (only rightward shift of the Ang II concentration-response curve) or insurmountably (also decreasing the maximal response). Insurmountable behaviour reflects the formation of tight sartan-receptor complexes; it is often partial due to the co-existence of tight and loose complexes. Their ratio positively correlates with the dissociation half-life of the tight complexes and depends on the sartan: i.e. candesartan>olmesartan>telmisartan approximately equal EXP3174>valsartan>irbesartan>>losartan. When AT(1) receptors display sufficient basal activity (in case of receptor over-expression, mutation and, especially, tissue stretching) sartans may also act as inverse agonists. This rather affects long-term, G protein-independent hypertrophic responses leading to cardiovascular remodelling.

Molecular characterisation of the interactions between olmesartan and telmisartan and the human angiotensin II AT1 receptor

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Whereas some angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) produce surmountable antagonism of AT(1) receptors, others such as olmesartan and telmisartan display varying degrees of insurmountability. This study compared the molecular interactions of olmesartan and telmisartan with the human AT(1) receptor, using well characterised in vitro methods and model systems.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

CHO-K1 cells that stably express human AT(1) receptors (CHO-hAT(1) cells) were used in several pharmacological studies of olmesartan and telmisartan, including direct radioligand binding and inhibition of Ang II-induced inositol phosphate (IP) accumulation.

KEY RESULTS

Both ARBs were found to be competitive antagonists that displayed high affinity, slow dissociation, and a high degree of insurmountability for the AT(1) receptor (the latter greater with olmesartan). Their receptor interactions could be described by a two-step process with the initial formation of a loose complex (IR) and subsequent transformation into a tight binding complex (IR*). In washout experiments, [(3)H] telmisartan dissociated from the receptor with a half-life of 29 min and the Ang II-mediated IP accumulation response was 50% maximally restored within 24 min, whereas values for [(3)H] olmesartan were 72 min and 76 min, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The high degree of insurmountability, slow dissociation, and high affinity of olmesartan for its receptor may relate to its ability to stabilise IR* via the carboxyl group of its imidazole core. In comparison, telmisartan displays a less potent interaction with the receptor.

Long-lasting angiotensin type 1 receptor binding and protection by candesartan: comparison with other biphenyl-tetrazole sartans

BACKGROUND

The ability of biphenyl-tetrazole angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists (BTsartans) to block angiotensin II (Ang II)-mediated responses has been extensively investigated in vascular tissues and, more recently, in cell lines expressing the human AT1-receptor. When pre-incubated, BTsartans acted surmountably (shifting the Ang II concentration-response curve to the right) or insurmountably (also decreasing the maximal response). It was shown that their insurmountable behaviour is due to the formation of tight, long-lasting complexes with the receptor. Partial insurmountable antagonism is due to the co-existence of tight and loose complexes. The proportion of insurmountable antagonism, the potency and the dissociation rate of the BTsartans decreases in the order: candesartan > EXP3174 (losartan's active metabolite) > valsartan > irbesartan >> losartan.

OBJECTIVE

It is of interest to explore how tight AT1-receptor binding of BTsartans such as candesartan might contribute to their long-lasting clinical effect.

METHODS

Computer-assisted simulations (COPASI program) were performed to follow the receptor-occupation and protection by different antagonists as a function of time. Free antagonist concentrations were allowed to decrease exponentially with time.

RESULTS

The simulations suggest that slow dissociation does not tangibly prolong receptor occupancy if the free antagonist is eliminated at a slower pace (as is the case for BTsartans). Yet when surmountable and insurmountable antagonists occupy the same amount of receptors, insurmountable antagonists offer appreciably better protection against fluctuations in natural messenger concentration.

CONCLUSION

Slow receptor dissociation and slow antagonist elimination are likely to act in synergy to produce long-lasting receptor protection.

G protein-coupled receptors: a count of 1001 conformations

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were initially regarded to adopt an inactive and an active conformation and to activate a single type of G protein. Studies with recombinant cell systems have led to a more complex picture. First, GPCRs can activate distinct G protein species. Second, GPCR multistate models have been invoked to explain their complex behaviour in the presence of agonists, antagonists and other binding partners. The occurrence of intermediate receptor conformational states during GPCR activation and antagonist binding is suggested by fluorescence measurements and studies with constitutively active receptor mutants and insurmountable antagonists. Different agonists may trigger distinct effector pathways through a single receptor by dictating its preference for certain G proteins (i.e. 'agonist trafficking'). Structural modification and exogenous and endogenous (e.g. other cellular proteins, lipids) allosteric modulators also affect ligand-GPCR interaction and receptor activation. These new developments in GPCR research could lead to the development of more selective therapeutic drugs.

Ligand binding and functional properties of human angiotensin AT1 receptors in transiently and stably expressed CHO-K1 cells

Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells (CHO-K1) were transiently and stably transfected to express the human angiotensin AT(1) receptor. Cell surface receptor expression was maximal 2 days after transient transfection. Their pharmacological and signalling properties differed from stably expressed receptors. Receptor reserve was significant in the transient cells but not in stable cells, explaining the higher potency of angiotensin II and the lower degree of insurmountable inhibition by candesartan in the transient cells. [Sar(1)Ile(8)]angiotensin II (sarile) is a potent angiotensin AT(1) receptor antagonist for the stable cells but is a partial agonist, producing 19% of the maximal response by angiotensin II, in transient cells. Internalization of [(3)H]angiotensin II and [(125)I]sarile (i.e., acid-resistant binding) was more pronounced in stable cells. CHO-K1 cells were also transiently transfected with the enhanced green fluorescence-AT(1) receptor gene. Confocal microscopy revealed rapid internalization induced by angiotensin II and sarile but not by candesartan. The above disparities may result from differences in receptor maturation and/or cellular surrounding.

Effect of saponin and filipin on antagonist binding to AT 1 receptors in intact cells

In the present study, [ 3H ]-candesartan binding experiments were performed on intact Chinese Hamster Ovary cells transfected with the human AT1 receptor (CHO-AT1 cells). Cells were pre-treated with 0.01mg/ml saponin or filipin. Both pre-treatments resulted in an increased dissociation rate and decreased affinity of the insurmountable non-peptide antagonist [3H ]-candesartan. A similar decrease in affinity was observed for the peptide antagonist Sar1-Ile8 angiotensin II and for other non-peptide antagonists, irrespectively of their degree of insurmountability. A similar discrepancy in [ 3H ]-candesartan binding was earlier observed when comparing intact CHO-AT1 cells and membrane preparations thereof. This similarity is further highlighted by the observations that saponin or filipin no longer affect [ 3H ]-candesartan binding to CHO-AT1 cell membranes and that both agents permeabilise the CHO-AT1 cells. This suggests that the intracellular composition and/or organisation of living cells play an active role with regard to antagonist-AT1 receptor interactions.

A two-state model of antagonist-AT1 receptor interaction: further support by binding studies at low temperature

The molecular mechanism of insurmountable antagonism was investigated to a large extent in Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with the human angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT(1)) receptor. It was proposed that AT(1) receptor antagonists interact with their receptor according to a two-state receptor model. Briefly, this theoretical model reveals that antagonist bound AT(1) receptor can adopt a fast and a slow reversible state. The first, fast reversible state is similar for all antagonists, while the slow reversible state displays the characteristics of each antagonist. In the present study, we performed competition experiments with the AT(1) receptor antagonists candesartan, EXP3174, irbesartan, losartan and ligand [3H]-angiotensin II at 0-4 degrees. This gave the opportunity to verify the two-state model for the first time with experimental data.