1
|
Popay J, Halliday E, Mead R, Townsend A, Akhter N, Bambra C, Barr B, Anderson de Cuevas R, Daras K, Egan M, Gravenhorst K, Janke K, Kasim AS, McGowan V, Ponsford R, Reynolds J, Whitehead M. Investigating health and social outcomes of the Big Local community empowerment initiative in England: a mixed method evaluation. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH 2023; 11:1-147. [PMID: 37929801 DOI: 10.3310/grma6711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Most research on community empowerment provides evidence on engaging communities for health promotion purposes rather than attempts to create empowering conditions. This study addresses this gap. Intervention Big Local started in 2010 with £271M from the National Lottery. Ending in 2026, it gives 150 relatively disadvantaged communities in England control over £1M to improve their neighbourhoods. Objective To investigate health and social outcomes, at the population level and among engaged residents, of the community engagement approach adopted in a place-based empowerment initiative. Study design, data sources and outcome variables This study reports on the third wave of a longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation. Work package 1 used a difference-in-differences design to investigate the impact of Big Local on population outcomes in all 150 Big Local areas compared to matched comparator areas using secondary data. The primary outcome was anxiety; secondary outcomes included a population mental health measure and crime in the neighbourhood. Work package 2 assessed active engagement in Big Local using cross-sectional data and nested cohort data from a biannual survey of Big Local partnership members. The primary outcome was mental well-being and the secondary outcome was self-rated health. Work package 3 conducted qualitative research in 14 Big Local neighbourhoods and nationally to understand pathways to impact. Work package 4 undertook a cost-benefit analysis using the life satisfaction approach to value the benefits of Big Local, which used the work package 1 estimate of Big Local impact on life satisfaction. Results At a population level, the impacts on 'reporting high anxiety' (-0.8 percentage points, 95% confidence interval -2.4 to 0.7) and secondary outcomes were not statistically significant, except burglary (-0.054 change in z-score, 95% confidence interval -0.100 to -0.009). There was some effect on reduced anxiety after 2017. Areas progressing fastest had a statistically significant reduction in population mental health measure (-0.053 change in z-score, 95% confidence interval -0.103 to -0.002). Mixed results were found among engaged residents, including a significant increase in mental well-being in Big Local residents in the nested cohort in 2018, but not by 2020; this is likely to be COVID-19. More highly educated residents, and males, were more likely to report a significant improvement in mental well-being. Qualitative accounts of positive impacts on mental well-being are often related to improved social connectivity and physical/material environments. Qualitative data revealed increasing capabilities for residents' collective control. Some negative impacts were reported, with local factors sometimes undermining residents' ability to exercise collective control. Finally, on the most conservative estimate, the cost-benefit calculations generate a net benefit estimate of £64M. Main limitations COVID-19 impacted fieldwork and interpretation of survey data. There was a short 4-year follow-up (2016/20), no comparators in work package 2 and a lack of power to look at variations across areas. Conclusions Our findings suggest the need for investment to support community organisations to emerge from and work with communities. Residents should lead the prioritisation of issues and design of solutions but not necessarily lead action; rather, agencies should work as equal partners with communities to deliver change. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research Programme (16/09/13) and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 11, No. 9. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie Popay
- Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Emma Halliday
- Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Rebecca Mead
- Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Anne Townsend
- Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Nasima Akhter
- Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK
| | - Clare Bambra
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Ben Barr
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Konstantinos Daras
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Matt Egan
- Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Katja Gravenhorst
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Katharina Janke
- Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | | | - Victoria McGowan
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Ruth Ponsford
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Joanna Reynolds
- Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Margaret Whitehead
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Palomares Velosa JE, Figueroa Gómez JE, Rojas Zúñiga CN, Díaz G, Ferro BE, Davis JL, Grau LE. Exploring stakeholders perspectives on TB contact investigation in Cali, Colombia: a qualitative study. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1204862. [PMID: 37564424 PMCID: PMC10411903 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1204862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Contact investigation is a proven intervention for tuberculosis (TB) case finding and prevention. Although widely endorsed by national public health authorities and the World Health Organization, many countries struggle to implement it effectively. The objective of the study is to describe and characterize the barriers and facilitators of TB contact investigation in Cali, Colombia from the perspective and experience of the key stakeholders involved. Methods We collected data from group discussions during two workshop sessions with clinic and public health staff involved in TB contact investigation (June 2019 and March 2020 respectively) and semi-structured interviews with TB cases and their household contacts (July 2019 to April 2020). We undertook an inductive thematic analysis with the RADaR technique to characterize the barriers and facilitators of the TB contact investigation process. Results The two workshops included 21 clinics and 12 public health staff. We also conducted 26 semi-structured interviews with TB cases and their household contacts. Using thematic analysis, we identified four common themes: Healthcare Operations, Essential Knowledge, Time Limitations and Competing Responsibilities, and Interpersonal Interactions. The main barriers to conducting household visits were low data quality, stigma and mistrust, safety concerns for health workers, and limited resources. The main barriers to TB uptake by contacts were competing responsibilities, low TB risk perceptions among contacts, and difficulty accessing diagnostic tests for contacts. In contrast, good communication and social skills among health workers and accurate TB knowledge facilitated successful household visits and TB test uptake, according to key stakeholders. Conclusion This study provides a deeper understanding of TB contact investigation barriers and facilitators in a high-prevalence urban setting in a middle-income country from the perspective and experience of key stakeholders. The study shed light on the barriers that hinder household contacts engagement and TB test uptake such as issues of systemic capacity and TB knowledge. Also, highlighted facilitators such as the importance of interpersonal communication skills among health workers in the public and private sector. The insights from this study can serve as a valuable resource for public health organizations seeking to enhance their contact investigation efforts and improve TB control in similar settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jairo E. Palomares Velosa
- Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas – CIDEIM, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
- Universidad Icesi, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
| | | | | | - Gustavo Díaz
- Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas – CIDEIM, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
- Universidad Icesi, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
| | - Beatriz E. Ferro
- Departamento de Ciencias Básicas Médicas, Universidad Icesi, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
| | - J. Lucian Davis
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States
- Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine Section, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Lauretta E. Grau
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Palomares Velosa JE, Riaño Sánchez S, Martínez Marín A, Cediel Becerra NM. Prevention of exposure to zoonoses in rural Latin America: Social ecological factors in a diverse regional context. One Health 2022; 15:100444. [PMID: 36277084 PMCID: PMC9582569 DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Zoonotic diseases have serious impacts on human health and well-being, but they are often overlooked in rural Latin America. The design of effective preventive interventions is complex and requires an integrative approach from evidence-based information analyzed through robust theoretical frameworks. We conducted a systematized literature review and qualitative framework-guided thematic analysis to identify social ecological factors affecting the prevention and exposure to zoonotic diseases. Although resources for research are limited in Latin America, we found several studies with relevant results. We extracted and interpreted 8 themes as factors affecting the prevention, transmission, and exposure to zoonosis. These themes included knowledge and misconceptions, low risk perception, gaps in knowledge and communication, psychological effect of diseases, culture and traditions, inequality, disarticulated prevention programs, and organizational responsibility. Alongside this, we compiled and present the recommendations for actions to reduce the impact of zoonoses in these populations. The factors and recommendations here presented can be adapted to inform the design and improvement of preventive programs, focused on One Health and aiming to reduce the impact of zoonotic diseases in rural settings. We identified relevant social and behavioural factors affecting the prevention of Zoonotic diseases in Latin America. Knowledge, risk perceptions, and communication quality were relevant individual factors. Inequity and unarticulated programs were relevant social factors. Characterization of the context-specific social ecology can improve the development of effective interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jairo Enrique Palomares Velosa
- Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Medicas - CIDEIM, Cali, valle del cauca, Colombia,Corresponding author at: Calle. 18 #122-135, Icesi University campus, building O, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fynn JF, Hardeman W, Milton K, Jones AP. A scoping review of evaluation frameworks and their applicability to real-world physical activity and dietary change programme evaluation. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1000. [PMID: 32586301 PMCID: PMC7318477 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09062-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical activity and dietary change programmes play a central role in addressing public health priorities. Programme evaluation contributes to the evidence-base about these programmes; and helps justify and inform policy, programme and funding decisions. A range of evaluation frameworks have been published, but there is uncertainty about their usability and applicability to different programmes and evaluation objectives, and the extent to which they are appropriate for practitioner-led or researcher-led evaluation. This review appraises the frameworks that may be applicable to evaluation of physical activity and/or dietary change programmes, and develops a typology of the frameworks to help guide decision making by practitioners, commissioners and evaluators. METHODS A scoping review approach was used. This included a systematic search and consultation with evaluation experts to identify evaluation frameworks and to develop a set of evaluation components to appraise them. Data related to each framework's general characteristics and components were extracted. This was used to construct a typology of the frameworks based on their intended programme type, evaluation objective and format. Each framework was then mapped against the evaluation components to generate an overview of the guidance included within each framework. RESULTS The review identified 71 frameworks. These were described variously in terms of purpose, content, or applicability to different programme contexts. The mapping of frameworks highlighted areas of overlap and strengths and limitations in the available guidance. Gaps within the frameworks which may warrant further development included guidance on participatory approaches, non-health and unanticipated outcomes, wider contextual and implementation factors, and sustainability. CONCLUSIONS Our typology and mapping signpost to frameworks where guidance on specific components can be found, where there is overlap, and where there are gaps in the guidance. Practitioners and evaluators can use these to identify, agree upon and apply appropriate frameworks. Researchers can use them to identify evaluation components where there is already guidance available and where further development may be useful. This should help focus research efforts where it is most needed and promote the uptake and use of evaluation frameworks in practice to improve the quality of evaluation and reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith F Fynn
- UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
| | - Wendy Hardeman
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Karen Milton
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Andy P Jones
- UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Agarwal G, Girard M, Angeles R, Pirrie M, Lussier MT, Marzanek F, Dolovich L, Paterson JM, Thabane L, Kaczorowski J. Design and rationale for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial of the Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP) for social housing residents in Ontario and Quebec, Canada. Trials 2019; 20:760. [PMID: 31870415 PMCID: PMC6929306 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3806-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP) uses volunteers to provide cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes screening in a community setting, referrals to primary care providers, and locally available programs targeting lifestyle modification. CHAP has been adapted to target older adults residing in social housing, a vulnerable segment of the population. Older adults living in social housing report poorer health status and have a higher burden of a multitude of chronic illnesses, such as CVD and diabetes. The study objective is to evaluate whether there is a reduction in unplanned CVD-related Emergency Department (ED) visits and hospital admissions among residents of social seniors' housing buildings receiving the CHAP program for 1 year compared to residents in matched buildings not receiving the program. METHODS/DESIGN This is a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial in community-based social (subsidized) housing buildings in Ontario and Quebec. All residents of 14 matched pairs (intervention/control) of apartment buildings will be included. Buildings with 50-200 apartment units with the majority of residents aged 55+ and a unique postal code are included. All individuals residing within the buildings at the start of the intervention period are included (intention to treat, open cohort). The intervention instrument consists of CHAP screens for high blood pressure using automated blood pressure monitors and for diabetes using the Canadian Diabetes Risk (CANRISK) assessment tool. Monthly drop-in sessions for screening/monitoring are held within a common area of the building. Group health education sessions are also held monthly. Reports are sent to family doctors, and attendees are encouraged to visit their family doctor. The primary outcome measure is monthly CVD-related ED visits and hospitalizations over a 1-year period post randomization. Secondary outcomes are all ED visits, hospitalizations, quality of life, cost-effectiveness, and participant experience. DISCUSSION It is anticipated that CVD-related ED visits and hospitalizations will decrease in the intervention buildings. Using the volunteer-led CHAP program, there is significant opportunity to improve the health of older adults in social housing. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03549845. Registered on 15 May 2018. Updated on 21 May 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina Agarwal
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main Street West, DBHSC, 5th Floor, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada.
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
| | - Magali Girard
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Canada
| | - Ricardo Angeles
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main Street West, DBHSC, 5th Floor, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Melissa Pirrie
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main Street West, DBHSC, 5th Floor, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Marie-Thérèse Lussier
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Primary Care Research Team, Centre intégré de santé et des services sociaux de Laval, Laval, QC, Canada
| | - Francine Marzanek
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main Street West, DBHSC, 5th Floor, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Lisa Dolovich
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main Street West, DBHSC, 5th Floor, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - J Michael Paterson
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main Street West, DBHSC, 5th Floor, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Biostatistics Unit, St Joseph's Healthcare Research Institute, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Janusz Kaczorowski
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Canada
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carpenter R, DiChiacchio T, Barker K. Interventions for self-management of type 2 diabetes: An integrative review. Int J Nurs Sci 2019; 6:70-91. [PMID: 31406872 PMCID: PMC6608673 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Revised: 09/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been identified as one of the most challenging chronic illnesses to manage. Since the management of diabetes is mainly accomplished by patients and families, self-management has become the mainstay of diabetes care. However, a significant proportion of patients fail to engage in adequate self-management. A priority research question is how do interventions affect the self-management behaviors of persons with Type 2 diabetes? PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES The purpose of this integrative review is to provide a summary and critique of interventions that support diabetes self-management in the patient with Type II diabetes mellitus. DESIGN An integrative review design, with a comprehensive methodological approach of reviews, allowing inclusion of experimental and non-experimental studies. PROCEDURES A comprehensive search was conducted via Ebscohost using databases of Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE, PsycArtiCLES, and PsycInfo. The final number of papers used for this review were: motivational interviewing (6), peer support/coaching (10), problem solving therapy (3), technology-based interventions (30), lifestyle modification programs (7), patient education (11), mindfulness (3), and cognitive behavioral therapy (5). RESULTS Studies were examined from seventeen countries including a broad range of cultures and ethnicities. While interventions have shown mixed results in all interventional categories, many studies do support small to modest improvements in physiologic, behavioral, and psychological outcome measures. Considerable heterogeneity of interventions exists. The most commonly reported physiologic measure was HbA1c level. Outcome measures were collected mostly at 6 and 12 months. Duration of most research was limited to one year. CONCLUSIONS Research exploring the impact of interventions for self-management has made major contributions to the care of persons with type 2 diabetes, from offering suggestions for improving care, to stimulating new questions for research. However, implications for clinical practice remain inconclusive, and limitations in existing research suggest caution in interpreting results of studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Carpenter
- West Virginia University School of Nursing, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA
| | - Toni DiChiacchio
- Faculty Practice & Community Engagement, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA
| | - Kendra Barker
- West Virginia University School of Nursing, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ezeanolue EE, Pharr JR, Patel DV, Ezeanolue CO, Obiefune MC, Ogidi AG, Ehiri JE. Developing a Theoretical Framework for a Complex Maternal-Child Health Intervention: Health Beginning Initiative. Health Promot Pract 2018; 20:941-950. [PMID: 29938536 DOI: 10.1177/1524839918782929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
A theoretical framework serves as a roadmap for the implementation and application of a complex, health promotion intervention; is used to test hypotheses; and guides analysis and evaluation of the intervention. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how a theoretical framework was developed and used to guide the implementation of Healthy Beginning Initiative (HBI) to promote uptake of HIV services in a low-income country. We used the guide for developing a theoretical framework published in Health Promotion Practice. Developing the theoretical framework included seven steps: (1) identifying the essential elements of the intervention; (2) identifying the variables and the context; (3) listing the postulated mechanisms, mediating variables, and postulated outcomes; (4) identifying existing theoretical models supporting the theoretical framework underdevelopment; (5) scripting the theoretical framework into either a figure or sets of statements; (6) conducting content and face validation of the theoretical framework; and (7) revising the theoretical framework. The theoretical framework was developed and used to evaluate HBI's impact on HIV testing, linkage to care and retention in care for pregnant women, their male partners, and newborns. The theoretical framework will also be adapted for other screenings and other settings while remaining true to the essential elements of HBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Amaka G Ogidi
- Prevention, Education, Treatment, Training and Research-Global Solutions, Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lorthios-Guilledroit A, Richard L, Filiatrault J. Factors associated with the implementation of community-based peer-led health promotion programs: A scoping review. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING 2018; 68:19-33. [PMID: 29459228 DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Peer education is growing in popularity as a useful health promotion strategy. However, optimal conditions for implementing peer-led health promotion programs (HPPs) remain unclear. This scoping review aimed to describe factors that can influence implementation of peer-led HPPs targeting adult populations. Five databases were searched using the keywords "health promotion/prevention", "implementation", "peers", and related terms. Studies were included if they reported at least one factor associated with the implementation of community-based peer-led HPPs. Fifty-five studies were selected for the analysis. The method known as "best fit framework synthesis" was used to analyze the factors identified in the selected papers. Many factors included in existing implementation conceptual frameworks were deemed applicable to peer-led HPPs. However, other factors related to individuals, programs, and implementation context also emerged from the analysis. Based on this synthesis, an adapted theoretical framework was elaborated, grounded in a complex adaptive system perspective and specifying potential mechanisms through which factors may influence implementation of community-based peer-led HPPs. Further research is needed to test the theoretical framework against empirical data. Findings from this scoping review increase our knowledge of the optimal conditions for implementing peer-led HPPs and thereby maximizing the benefits of such programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agathe Lorthios-Guilledroit
- School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, P.O. Box 6128, Centre-Ville Station, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3J7, Canada; Université de Montréal Public Health Research Institute, 7101 du Parc Avenue, P.O. Box 6128, Centre-Ville Station, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3J7, Canada; Centre de recherche, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, 4545 Queen Mary Road, Montreal, Quebec, H3W 1W4, Canada.
| | - Lucie Richard
- Université de Montréal Public Health Research Institute, 7101 du Parc Avenue, P.O. Box 6128, Centre-Ville Station, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3J7, Canada; Faculty of Nursing Sciences, Pavillon Marguerite-d'Youville, Université de Montréal, P.O. Box 6128, Centre-ville Station, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3J7, Canada.
| | - Johanne Filiatrault
- Centre de recherche, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, 4545 Queen Mary Road, Montreal, Quebec, H3W 1W4, Canada; School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine Université de Montréal, P.O. Box 6128, Centre-ville Station, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3J7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Watson DP, Adams EL, Shue S, Coates H, McGuire A, Chesher J, Jackson J, Omenka OI. Defining the external implementation context: an integrative systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:209. [PMID: 29580251 PMCID: PMC5870506 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3046-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Proper implementation of evidence-based interventions is necessary for their full impact to be realized. However, the majority of research to date has overlooked facilitators and barriers existing outside the boundaries of the implementing organization(s). Better understanding and measurement of the external implementation context would be particularly beneficial in light of complex health interventions that extend into and interact with the larger environment they are embedded within. We conducted a integrative systematic literature review to identify external context constructs likely to impact implementation of complex evidence-based interventions. Methods The review process was iterative due to our goal to inductively develop the identified constructs. Data collection occurred in four primary stages: (1) an initial set of key literature across disciplines was identified and used to inform (2) journal and (3) author searches that, in turn, informed the design of the final (4) database search. Additionally, (5) we conducted citation searches of relevant literature reviews identified in each stage. We carried out an inductive thematic content analysis with the goal of developing homogenous, well-defined, and mutually exclusive categories. Results We identified eight external context constructs: (1) professional influences, (2) political support, (3) social climate, (4) local infrastructure, (5) policy and legal climate, (6) relational climate, (7) target population, and (8) funding and economic climate. Conclusions This is the first study to our knowledge to use a systematic review process to identify empirically observed external context factors documented to impact implementation. Comparison with four widely-utilized implementation frameworks supports the exhaustiveness of our review process. Future work should focus on the development of more stringent operationalization and measurement of these external constructs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3046-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis P Watson
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| | - Erin L Adams
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University Purdue University-Indianapolis, 420 N Blackford St, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Sarah Shue
- Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Heather Coates
- Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, University Library, Center for Digital Scholarship, 755 W. Michigan St, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Alan McGuire
- Richard L. Roudebush VA, 1481 W. 10th St, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Jeremy Chesher
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Joanna Jackson
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Ogbonnaya I Omenka
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Obesity is a pervasive global public health concern of utmost priority. Effective and efficient interventions are urgently needed to reverse current trends, especially among children. The past decade has witnessed increasing adoption and implementation of community-engaged and -participatory interventions that employ a bottom-up approach to identifying and realizing sustainable solutions within communities. It is argued herein that community-based approaches are most effective when implemented via a systems perspective that integrates across societal sectors. This approach seizes upon the synergistic effects that result from simultaneously mobilizing community assets at multiple levels. This paper provides an overview of the evolution and theory behind community-engaged, community-participatory, and systems-level interventions, discusses recent findings in the field, offers reflections based on first-hand experience, outlines advances in relevant resources, and lays forth potential and promising directions for future research. It emphasizes the centrality and necessity of community-engaged systems-level interventions in halting and reversing the obesity epidemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Economos
- Friedman School of Nutrition, Tufts University, 150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
| | - Stacy Blondin
- Food Policy and Applied Nutrition, Friedman School of Nutrition, Tufts University, 150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|