One-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Legflow Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Occlusions Registry

Novel Payloads to Mitigate Maladaptive Inward Arterial Remodeling in Drug-Coated Balloon Therapy

Drug-coated balloon therapy is a minimally invasive endovascular approach to treat obstructive arterial disease, with increasing utilization in the peripheral circulation due to improved outcomes as compared to alternative interventional modalities. Broader clinical use of drug-coated balloons is limited by an incomplete understanding of device- and patient-specific determinants of treatment efficacy, including late outcomes that are mediated by postinterventional maladaptive inward arterial remodeling. To address this knowledge gap, we propose a predictive mathematical model of pressure-mediated femoral artery remodeling following drug-coated balloon deployment, with account of drug-based modulation of resident vascular cell phenotype and common patient comorbidities, namely, hypertension and endothelial cell dysfunction. Our results elucidate how postinterventional arterial remodeling outcomes are altered by the delivery of a traditional anti-proliferative drug, as well as by codelivery with an anti-contractile drug. Our findings suggest that codelivery of anti-proliferative and anti-contractile drugs could improve patient outcomes following drug-coated balloon therapy, motivating further consideration of novel payloads in next-generation devices.

Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Dysfunctional Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have illustrated the potential superiority of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in maintaining patency after initial angioplasty for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) dysfunction due to stenosis. Our trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of DCBs for preventing fistula restenosis in Chinese hemodialysis patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, controlled trial.

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS

A total of 161 hemodialysis patients with fistula dysfunction from 10 centers in China.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomized 1:1 to treatment with initial dilation followed by DCB angioplasty or conventional high-pressure balloon (HPB) angioplasty.

OUTCOMES

The primary end point was target lesion primary patency defined as the target lesion intervention-free survival in conjunction with an ultrasonography-measured peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) ≤2.0 at 6 months. The secondary end points included 1) device, technical, clinical, and procedural success; 2) major adverse events; 3) degree of target lesion stenosis at 6 months; and 4) clinically driven target lesion and target shunt revascularization within 12 months.

RESULTS

The percentage with target lesion primary patency as defined by a PSVR ≤2.0 was higher in the DCB group than in the control group (65% vs 37%, respectively; rate difference, 28% [95% CI, 13%-43%]; P <0.001) at 6 months. The target lesion and target shunt intervention-free survival of the DCB group were not superior to those of the control group at 6 months (P = 0.3 and P = 0.2, respectively) but were superior at 12 months (target lesion intervention-free survival: 73% for DCB vs 58% for control [P = 0.04]; target shunt intervention-free survival: 73% for DCB vs 57% for control [P = 0.04]). The average degree of target lesion stenoses at 6 months was not significantly different between the 2 groups (44% ± 16% for DCB vs 49% ± 18% for control; P = 0.09). There were no significant differences in major adverse events or in device, technical, clinical, or procedural success rates between the groups.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size; short follow-up period; procedural differences between the 2 groups such as unequal inflation times and balloon lengths.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to conventional HPB angioplasty, DCB treatment achieved superior primary patency defined using PSVR measured at 6 months and superior intervention-free survival of both the target lesion and the target shunt at 12 months without evidence of greater adverse events.

FUNDING

Funded by ZhuHai Cardionovum Medical Device Co., Ltd.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT02962141.

Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: To investigate the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCB) for the treatment of femoropopliteal or infrapopliteal lesions in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central up to January 2020 to identify randomized trials and observational studies presenting data on the effectiveness and safety of DCBs in the treatment of femoropopliteal or infrapopliteal lesions. A meta-analysis utilizing random effects modeling was conducted to investigate primary patency and all-cause mortality at 12 months; the results are reported as the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Secondary outcomes were procedural success, bailout stenting, target lesion revascularization (TLR), reocclusion, major amputation, wound healing, and major adverse limb events. Results: Twenty-six studies, 12 retrospective and 14 prospective, comprising 2108 CLTI patients treated with DCBs for femoropopliteal (n=1315) or infrapopliteal (n=793) lesions were analyzed. The average lesion lengths were 121±44 and 135±53 mm, respectively. The overall 12-month all-cause mortality and major amputation rates were 9% (95% CI 6% to 13%) and 5% (95% CI 2% to 8%), respectively. Primary patency rates were 82% (95% CI 76% to 87%) and 64% (95% CI 58% to 70%), respectively. A sensitivity analysis of the infrapopliteal lesions demonstrated no difference between DCB and balloon angioplasty in terms of primary patency, TLR, major amputation, or mortality over 12 months. However, patients with infrapopliteal lesions undergoing DCB angioplasty did have a significantly lower risk for reocclusion (10% vs 25%; OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.70, p=0.002). Conclusion: DCB angioplasty of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal lesions in patients with CLTI results in acceptable 12-month patency rates, although comparative data have not shown a patency benefit for infrapopliteal lesions. The 12-month mortality rate of DCB vs balloon angioplasty was not significantly different, but studies with longer-term outcomes are necessary to determine any association between DCB use and mortality in patients with CLTI.

Comparative 12-Month Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Non-Drug-Coated Balloon Revascularization Strategy in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: Results From the XLPAD Registry

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy is often the preferred first treatment option for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients. Drug coated balloons (DCB) reduce restenosis rates compared to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), however DCB use has not been studied systematically in patients with CLTI. Thus, the optimal treatment option for these complex lesions remains controversial.

METHODS

We report on 327 patients with CLTI treated either with DCB (n = 105) or non-DCB (n = 222) for femoropopliteal disease. Data were retrieved from the Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) registry (NCT01904851). Two DCB types were used at the discretion of the operator: Lutonix® (BARD Peripheral Vascular, Inc., Tempe, AZ, USA) and IN.PACT AdmiralTM (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). Odds ratios and the respective 95% confidence interval were synthesized to examine the association between the two groups in terms of all-cause mortality, target limb repeat endovascular or surgical revascularization, target vessel revascularization (TVR), major and minor amputation at 12 months of follow up.

RESULTS

The mean lesion length was 150.0 mm (SD:123.2) and 151.2 mm (SD:108.3) for the DCB and non-DCB group respectively. No difference between the two groups was detected in terms of all-cause mortality (2.86%vs2.7%,p = .94), target limb repeat endovascular or surgical revascularization (16.19%vs12.61%,p = .25), TVR (16.19%vs.11.71%,p = .26) or minor amputation (15.24%vs10.81%,p = .25) at 12 months of follow up. Although a higher incidence of 12 months major amputation was observed in the DCB group (11%vs.4%,p = .01), after adjusting for several risk factors the odds of major amputation were not statistically different between the DCB and non-DCB groups (OR:1.54;95%CI:0.53-4.51;p = .43).

CONCLUSIONS

Both DCB and non-DCB strategies are effective modalities for revascularization of patients with CLTI. No differences were identified between the DCB and non-DCB group in terms of late outcomes during 12 months of follow up.