Effectiveness and Safety of a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for Superficial Femoral Artery Lesions up to 190 mm: One-Year Outcomes of the Single-Arm IMPERIAL Long Lesion Substudy of the Eluvia Drug-Eluting Stent

A Bibliometric Analysis on Adherence to Reporting Standards for Endovascular Treatment of Chronic Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

The treatment of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) involves a broad spectrum of therapies including many new and emerging techniques. To standardize the results of studies examining this pathology and to allow critical analysis and comparison between studies, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) recommended reporting standard guidelines for the endovascular management of CLTI in 2016. Research studies that do not adhere to complete reporting standards are often more ambiguous in impact and external validity, leading to bias and misinformation that has potentially damaging effects on clinical decision-making. We thus sought to examine adherence to and factors associated with noncompliance with these recommended guidelines.

METHODS

A literature database search was conducted to include all clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, and retrospective comparative studies written in English examining the endovascular treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD)/CLTI from January 2020 to August 2022. Systematic reviews, case reports, and meta-analysis were excluded. The manuscripts were reviewed for adherence with the SVS guidelines (overall and by guideline subcategories based on demographics, treatment methods, and outcomes), and factors associated with this adherence were determined. These data were used to calculate descriptive and comparative statistics.

RESULTS

Fifty-four manuscripts were identified from this time frame. On average, articles reviewed reported on 42.0% of the SVS reporting standards (range, 25.0-65.2%, Fig 1) with 74.1% of articles (n = 40) not adhering to at least 50.0% of the standards. Manuscripts most completely followed guidelines regarding "patient factors" and were least likely to demonstrate adherence to the description of CLTI and study complications. Within the guideline subcategories, complete adherence to guidelines was not demonstrated in any manuscript in stent trials, disease outcome measures, technical outcome measures, patient factors and critical limb ischemia description, and complete adherence rates within the other subcategories was low (range, 5.6-18.6%). Studies conducted within the United States and those with industry sponsorship were more likely to adhere to >50% of the reporting standards (P < 0.05). Journal impact factor, year of publication, and number of authors had no correlation to the percent adherence to guidelines in specific categories or adherence overall.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to reporting standard guidelines for endovascular treatment of lower extremity PAD specifically outlined by the SVS is suboptimal regardless of the quality of the journal the research is published in. Increasing adherence to reporting standards to provide a framework for comparison of studies across techniques used should be prioritized by authors, journal editors, and vascular societies.

Randomized Trial Comparing a Stent-Avoiding With a Stent-Preferred Strategy in Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions

BACKGROUND

Limited comparative data exist on different interventional strategies for endovascular revascularization of complex femoropopliteal interventions.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the authors aimed to compare a stent-avoiding (SA) vs a stent-preferred (SP) strategy, promoting optimal lesion preparation and the use of drug-eluting technologies in both arms.

METHODS

Within a prospective, multicenter, pilot study, 120 patients with symptomatic complex femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford classification 2-4, mean lesion length 187.7 ± 78.3 mm, 79.2% total occlusions) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to endovascular treatment with either paclitaxel-coated balloons or polymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting stents. Lesion preparation including the use of devices for plaque modification and/or removal was at the operators' discretion in both treatment arms.

RESULTS

In the SA group, lesion preparation was more frequently performed (71.7% SA [43/60] vs 51.7% [31/60] SP; P = 0.038) with a high provisional stenting rate (48.3% [29/60]). At the 12-month follow-up, primary patency was 78.2% (43/55) in the SA group and 78.6% (44/56) in the SP group (P = 1.0; relative risk: 0.995; 95% CI: 0.818-1.210). Freedom from major adverse events was determined in 93.1% (54/58) in the SA group and in 94.9% (56/59) in the SP group (P = 0.717; relative risk: 0.981; 95% CI: 0.895-1.075), with all adverse events attributable to clinically driven target lesion revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Both endovascular strategies promoting lesion preparation before the use of drug-eluting devices suggest promising efficacy and safety results in complex femoropopliteal procedures with a high proportion of total occlusions through 12 months. Ongoing follow-up will show whether different results emerge over time. (Best Endovascular Strategy for Complex Lesions of the Superficial Femoral Artery [BEST-SFA]; NCT03776799).

Impact of Calcification on the Outcomes of Femoropopliteal Artery Endovascular Treatment Using a Polymer Coated Drug-Eluting Stent

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of calcification on the 12 and 24 months outcomes of the Eluvia™ (Boston Scientific®) drug-eluting stent (DES) for femoropopliteal occlusive disease using three different calcium scoring systems.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center, retrospective cohort-study (March-2016 to December-2018) of patients treated with the Eluvia™ DES for femoropopliteal atherosclerosis was performed. Outcomes included primary and secondary patency rates and freedom from target lesion revascularization (FTLR) and were analyzed by comparing the impact of calcium burden according to the following calcium scores: Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) score, number of vessel quadrants affected (0-4) and calcification score per Peripheral Academic Research Consortium (PARC) definitions.

RESULTS

In total, 111 Patients were included (mean age: 71.2 ± 7.9; 64% male). Most patients presented with Rutherford class 3 (79.9%), followed by class 5 (12.7%), class 4 (10%) and class 6 (6.4%). The mean lesion length was 197.6 ± 108.5 mm and 74.3% of patients had chronic total occlusions. There were no differences in primary patency between the calcification scores at 12 months (PACSS, LogRank = 0.28; quadrants, LogRank = 0.29; PARC, LogRank = 0.42) and 24 months (PACSS, LogRank = 0.13; quadrants, LogRank = 0.42; PARC, LogRank = 0.13). FTLR was significantly lower at 12 months in patients with calcification affecting 3 or 4 quadrants (LogRank = 0.022) but not at 24 months (LogRank = 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the Eluvia™ DES showed promising performance in calcified disease and the analysis according to the quadrant model predicted an increased risk for TLR at 12 months.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes After Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Femoropopliteal Lesions Greater Than 150 mm

OBJECTIVE

Indications for endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal (FP) lesions have steadily increased over the past decade. Accordingly, the number of devices has also increased but the choice of the best endovascular treatment remains to be defined. The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize all studies investigating endovascular treatment of FP lesions greater than 150 mm from 2010 to 2021.

METHODS

Articles were searched using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case series (prospective and retrospective) that evaluated any endovascular procedure in patients with long FP lesions classified TASC (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus document II on management of peripheral arterial disease) C and/or D, and a mean length >150 mm, primary outcome had to be the 1-year primary patency. Overall estimate of primary patency, secondary patency, and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year depending on the different devices were investigated. The meta-analysis was conducted following the requirements of the MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) checklist.

RESULTS

Forty-four papers comprising 4847 patients and 5282 treated limbs were included. Mean lesions length ranged from 150.5 to 330 mm. The pooled 1-year primary and secondary patencies, and freedom from TLR rates were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67-0.74), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83-0.91), and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.84), respectively. Primary permeability at 1 year were 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.73), 0.67 (95% CI: 0.60-0.74), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.64-0.84), and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.88) for bare metal stents, covered stents (CSs), drug-eluting stents, and drug-coated balloons (DCBs), respectively. Lesions treated with DCB had the highest 1-year primary patency rate.

CONCLUSIONS

At 1-year, endovascular procedures for FP lesions greater than 150 mm obtain satisfactory results. High primary patency rates were obtained with drug-coated devices, while CSs obtained less favorable results. Randomized studies comparing different devices in the treatment of long FP lesions remain necessary to determine the most optimal approach for the management of these patients.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This paper highlights on the one hand the satisfactory results of endovascular treatment on complex femoropopliteal lesions formerly reserved for conventional surgery. On the other hand, among the available devices, paclitaxel-eluting devices seem to show superior results which should make them recommended as first-line treatment.

Meta-analysis of outcomes from drug-eluting stent implantation in femoropopliteal arteries

OBJECTIVE

In recent years, studies of drug-eluting stent (DES) for femoropopliteal artery diseases (FPADs) have been gradually published. To explore whether this type of stent is superior to the traditional bare metal stent (BMS), we performed this study.

METHODS

A systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), and Cochrane Library was performed on November 29, 2022. We innovatively adopted the hazard ratio (HR), the most appropriate indicator, as a measure of the outcomes that fall under the category of time-to-event data. The HRs was extracted directly or indirectly. Then, the meta-analyses using random effects model were performed. The bias risks of included papers were assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. This study was registered on the PROSPER platform (CRD42023391944) and not funded.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs involving 1,889 participants were found. After pooled analyses, we obtained results without propensity on each of the following 3 outcomes of interest: in-stent restenosis (ISR) -free survival, primary patency (PP) survival, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) -free survival (P >0.05, respectively). Because the results of pooled analyses of the other two outcomes of interest (all-cause death free survival and clinical benefit survival) had high heterogeneity both, they were not accepted by us.

CONCLUSION

For FPADs, the DES has not yet demonstrated superiority or inferiority to BMS, in the ability to maintain PP, avoid ISR and TLR.

Hypoechoic Halo Imaging Findings Following Femoropopliteal Artery Stent Implantation: Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Hypoechoic peri-stent areas in duplex ultrasonography (DUS) (ie, "halo") have been noted following femoropopliteal artery stenting.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the prevalence, risk factors, and potential safety implications of hypoechoic halos identified with DUS following stent implantation in the IMPERIAL (ELUVIA Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Zilver PTX Stent) and EMINENT (Trial Comparing ELUVIA Versus Bare Metal Stent in Treatment of Superficial Femoral and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery) trials.

METHODS

The IMPERIAL and EMINENT studies of femoropopliteal artery stenting included polymer-based drug-eluting stent, nonpolymer drug-coated stent, and bare metal stent treatment arms. A dedicated DUS protocol was implemented for core laboratory assessment of halo presence at study follow-up visits. Logistic regressions were used to investigate risk factors for a halo sign and its impact on clinically driven target lesion revascularization and primary patency.

RESULTS

Diagnostic DUS imaging from 659 patients was obtained at time points ranging from 6 months to 5 years post-stent implantation. Halo prevalence ranged from 20% to 35% of patients with diagnostic DUS and was present at all time intervals. Halos were identified surrounding all stent types. In analyses of patients with diagnostic imaging from at least 2 visits, halo presence typically persisted, with occasional cases of regression and development at later times. No statistically significant association was found for halo status (ie, halo vs no halo) on 1-year clinically driven target lesion revascularization (OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.70-2.30; P = 0.4240) or primary patency (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.43-1.07; P = 0.0927).

CONCLUSIONS

A hypoechoic halo following a femoropopliteal stent procedure is a common occurrence associated with all studied stent types. The presence of a halo appears to be benign with no associated clinical sequelae or effect on target vessel revascularization rates within 1 year of stent implantation.

One Year Outcomes of Zilver PTX Versus Eluvia for Femoropopliteal Disease in Real-World Practice: REALDES Study

PURPOSE

This multicenter, prospective, observational study aimed to compare Zilver PTX and Eluvia stents in real-world settings for treating femoropopliteal lesions as the differences in the 1-year outcomes of these stents have not been elucidated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall, 200 limbs with native femoropopliteal artery disease were treated with Zilver PTX (96 limbs) or Eluvia (104 limbs) at 8 Japanese hospitals between February 2019 and September 2020. The primary outcome measure of this study was primary patency at 12 months, defined as a peak systolic velocity ratio of ≤2.4, without clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or stenosis ≤50% based on angiographic findings.

RESULTS

The baseline clinical and lesion characteristics of Zilver PTX and Eluvia groups were roughly comparable (of all limbs analyzed, approximately 30% presented with critical limb-threatening ischemia, approximately 60% presented with Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II C-D, and approximately half had total occlusion), except for the longer lesion lengths in the Zilver PTX group (185.7±92.0 mm vs 160.0±98.5 mm, p=0.030). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of primary patency at 12 months were 84.9% and 88.1% for Zilver PTX and Eluvia, respectively (log-rank p=0.417). Freedom from clinically-driven TLR rates were 88.8% and 90.9% for Zilver PTX and Eluvia, respectively (log-rank p=0.812).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the Zilver PTX and Eluvia stents were not different regarding primary patency and freedom from clinically-driven TLR at 12 months after treating patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease in real-world settings.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This is the first study to reveal that the Zilver PTX and Eluvia have similar results in real-world practice when the proper vessel preparation is performed. However, the type of restenosis in the Eluvia stent may differ from that in the Zilver PTX stent. Therefore, the results of this study may influence the selection of DES for femoropopliteal lesions in routine clinical practice.

Two-year clinical outcomes and predictors of restenosis following the use of polymer-coated paclitaxel-eluting stents or drug-coated balloons in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease

We aimed to assess the clinical performance and risk factors for patency loss within 2 years following the use of polymer-coated paclitaxel-eluting stents (PC-PESs) and drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in patients with lower extremity artery disease. Multi-center registry data from 151 patients (65 and 86 treated with PC-PES and DCB, respectively) were retrospectively investigated. Two-year primary patency (PP) and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Predictors of restenosis within 2 years of the procedures were analyzed using the random survival forest method. The consistent predictors of restenosis within 1 and 2 years were assessed and validated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Two-year PP was 77.2 and 57.2% (log rank p = 0.047) and freedom from CD-TLR was 84.4 and 84.8% in the PC-PES and DCB groups, respectively (log rank p = 0.89). In the DCB group, most of the patients (n = 77, 89.5%) were treated with high-dose DCB. Consistent predictors of restenosis were lower vessel diameter and severity of Clinical Frailty Scale in the PC-PES group, and severity of peripheral artery calcification scoring system grade, severity of post dissection pattern, and smaller vessel diameter in the DCB group. The validation analysis revealed that patients with consistent predictors had significantly worse PP values than that of those without in the PC-PES (87.9% vs. 55.3%, log rank p = 0.003) and DCB groups (75.9% vs. 35.2%, log rank p = 0.001). The 2-year PP of DCBs was lower than that of PC-PESs. A smaller vessel diameter could predict restenosis in both devices. Vessel calcification and dissection should be considered when using DCB to ensure longer term patency.

Comparing the impact of the loss of patency between treatment with drug-coated balloon angioplasty and drug-eluting stent placement

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results of endovascular treatment with drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) in atherosclerotic lesions in the femoropopliteal artery, as well as to assess restenotic patterns.

METHODS

Clinical data from 617 cases treated with DES or DCB for femoropopliteal diseases were analyzed in this multicenter, retrospective cohort study. From these, 290 DES and 145 DCB cases were extracted by propensity score matching. Outcomes investigated were 1- and 2-year primary patency, reintervention, and restenotic pattern and its impact on symptoms in each group.

RESULTS

The primary patency rates at 1 and 2 years in the DES group were superior to those in the DCB group (84.8% and 71.1% vs 81.3% and 66.6%, P = .043), whereas there was no significant difference in freedom from target lesion revascularization (91.6% and 82.6% vs 88.3% and 78.8%, P = .13). Compared with what was measured before the index procedures, exacerbated symptoms, rate of occlusion, and an increase in the occluded length at loss of patency were more frequent in the DES group than in the DCB group. The odds ratios were 3.53 (95% confidence interval, 1.31-9.49; P = .012), 3.61 (1.09-11.9; P = .036), and 3.82 (1.15-12.7; P = .029), respectively. On the other hand, the frequency of an increase in lesion length and requirement of target lesion revascularization were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary patency was significantly higher at 1 and 2 years in the DES than in the DCB group. However, DES were associated with exacerbated clinical symptoms and complicated lesion characteristics at the point of loss of patency.

Efficacy of a Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Bare Metal Stents for Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: Primary Results of the EMINENT Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

A clear patency benefit of a drug-eluting stent (DES) over bare metal stents (BMSs) for treating peripheral artery disease of the femoropopliteal segment has not been definitively demonstrated. The EMINENT study (Trial Comparing Eluvia Versus Bare Metal Stent in Treatment of Superficial Femoral and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery) was designed to evaluate the patency of the Eluvia DES (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA), a polymer-coated paclitaxel-eluting stent, compared with BMSs for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions.

METHODS

EMINENT is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter European study with blinded participants and outcome assessment. Patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (Rutherford category 2, 3, or 4) of the native superficial femoral artery or proximal popliteal artery with stenosis ≥70%, vessel diameter of 4 to 6 mm, and total lesion length of 30 to 210 mm were randomly assigned 2:1 to treatment with DES or BMS. The primary effectiveness outcome was primary patency at 12 months, defined as independent core laboratory-assessed duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio ≤2.4 in the absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization or surgical bypass of the target lesion. Primary sustained clinical improvement was a secondary outcome defined as a decrease in Rutherford classification of ≥1 categories compared with baseline without a repeat target lesion revascularization. Health-related quality of life and walking function were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 775 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with DES (n=508) or commercially available BMSs (n=267). Baseline clinical, demographic, and lesion characteristics were similar between the study groups. Mean lesion length was 75.6±50.3 and 72.2±47.0 mm in the DES and BMS groups, respectively. The 12-month incidence of primary patency for DES treatment (83.2% [337 of 405]) was significantly greater than for BMS (74.3% [165 of 222]; P<0.01). Incidence of primary sustained clinical improvement was greater among patients treated with the DES than among those who received a BMS (83.0% versus 76.6%; P=0.045). The health-related quality of life dimensions of mobility and pain/discomfort improved for the majority of patients in both groups (for 66.4% and 53.6% of DES-treated and for 64.2% and 58.1% of BMS-treated patients, respectively) but did not differ significantly. At 12 months, no statistical difference was observed in all-cause mortality between patients treated with the DES or BMS (2.7% [13 of 474] versus 1.1% [3 of 263]; relative risk, 2.4 [95% CI, 0.69-8.36]; P=0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

By demonstrating superior 1-year primary patency, the results of the EMINENT randomized study support the benefit of using a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent as a first-line stent-based intervention for patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease attributable to femoropopliteal lesions.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT02921230.

What should we expect from intravascular ultrasound use for complex femoropopliteal lesions?

In this review article, we summarize the clinical benefit of intravascular ultrasounds (IVUS) in the endovascular therapy (EVT) of complex femoropopliteal (FP) lesions. Due to the development of novel FP-dedicated devices, outcomes of FP-EVT have been improved. As a result, revascularization methods for the FP lesions have shifted to EVT. However, the long-term durability in complex FP lesions has not yet reached that of bypass surgery using autogenous vein. Strategies for EVT of complex FP lesions are still inconsistent and have room for improvement. Long-term results generally depend on the patient and lesion backgrounds but are also affected by the quality of the procedure. Previous reports have shown IVUS evaluation can better assess vessel size compared to conventional angiographic evaluation. In contrast to angio-guided EVT, which evaluates vessel size by inner diameter, IVUS can be evaluated it with an external elastic membrane, which leads to the selection of a more appropriate (basically, larger) size device. Conversely, angiographic evaluation underestimates the vessel size, suggesting that it may lead to insufficient result. Furthermore, IVUS can also assess the adequate guidewire route, presence of severe dissection etc. As the evidence so far shows, the use of IVUS may improve the quality of EVT procedure, resulting in improved long-term outcomes. In conclusion, despite the widespread use of IVUS in FP-EVT practice, it still conditionally applied. The purpose of IVUS in the EVT of complex FP lesions should be clarified. More evidence regarding the IVUS in complex FP lesions is needed.

Systemic single administration of anti-inflammatory microRNA 146a-5p loaded in polymeric nanomedicines with active targetability attenuates neointimal hyperplasia by controlling inflammation in injured arteries in a rat model

Neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) after revascularization is a key unsolved clinical problem. Various studies have shown that attenuation of the acute inflammatory response on the vascular wall can prevent NIH. MicroRNA146a-5p (miR146a-5p) has been reported to show anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the NF-κB pathway, a well-known key player of inflammation of the vascular wall. Here, a nanomedicine, which can reach the vascular injury site, based on polymeric micelles was applied to deliver miR146a-5p in a rat carotid artery balloon injury model. In vitro studies using inflammation-induced vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) was performed. Results showed anti-inflammatory response as an inhibitor of the NF-κB pathway and VSMC migration, suppression of reactive oxygen species production, and proinflammatory cytokine gene expression in VSMCs. A single systemic administration of miR146a-5p attenuated NIH and vessel remodeling in a carotid artery balloon injury model in both male and female rats in vivo. MiR146a-5p reduced proinflammatory cytokine gene expression in injured arteries and monocyte/macrophage infiltration into the vascular wall. Therefore, miR146a-5p delivery to the injury site demonstrated therapeutic potential against NIH after revascularization.

1-Year Outcomes of Fluoropolymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stent in Femoropopliteal Practice: Predictors of Restenosis and Aneurysmal Degeneration

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the 1-year risk of restenosis and aneurysmal degeneration and explore the associated factors after femoropopliteal implantation of fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stents (FP-DESs) for symptomatic atherosclerotic peripheral artery disease in real-world practice.

BACKGROUND

Although clinical trials have demonstrated that FP-DES implantation has favorable 1-year outcomes, its performance in real-world practice has not been well elucidated.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective, observational study evaluated 1,204 limbs (chronic limb-threatening ischemia: 34.8%, mean lesion length: 18.6 ± 9.9 cm, chronic total occlusion: 53.2%, bilateral wall calcification: 41.9%) of 1,097 patients with peripheral artery disease (age: 75 ± 9 years, men: 69.4%, diabetes mellitus: 60.8%, chronic kidney disease: 66.2%) undergoing Eluvia (Boston Scientific) drug-eluting stent implantation for femoropopliteal lesions. The primary outcome measure was 1-year restenosis, whereas the secondary outcome measures were 1-year occlusive restenosis, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, and aneurysmal degeneration.

RESULTS

The 1-year occurrence rates of restenosis (12.9%), occlusive restenosis (9.2%), stent thrombosis (3.3%), target lesion revascularization (6.2%), and aneurysmal degeneration (16.8%) were found. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that dialysis, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, history of revascularization, a smaller reference vessel diameter, chronic total occlusion, and spot stenting were significantly associated with an increased risk of 1-year restenosis, whereas intravascular ultrasound use and subintimal wire passage were significantly associated with an increased risk of 1-year aneurysmal degeneration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study documented the 1-year clinical outcomes after femoropopliteal endovascular therapy with FP-DES implantation in real-world practice. The 1-year restenosis rate would be clinically acceptable, whereas the occurrence of occlusive restenosis and aneurysmal degeneration should be noted.

2-Year Outcomes of the Eluvia Drug-Eluting Stent for the Treatment of Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the 2-year performance of a polymer-based drug-eluting stent (DES) for the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions.

BACKGROUND

Despite the promising early outcomes of the Eluvia DES, the long-term safety and efficacy of the device in a real-world scenario remain unclear.

METHODS

Between March 2016 and December 2018, 130 patients (137 lesions) with symptomatic femoropopliteal disease were included in this study. The primary outcome measure of this analysis was primary patency. Secondary patency, freedom from target lesion revascularization, freedom from surgical conversion, and overall mortality and morbidity were additionally analyzed.

RESULTS

The majority of patients presented with lifestyle-limiting claudication (n = 90 [69%]). The mean lesion length was 194 ± 108 mm, 74% of the lesions (n = 101) were chronic total occlusions, and 72% (n = 99) were calcified. Moderate to severe calcification (Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring Scale score 3 or 4) was observed in 48% of the treated vessels (n = 67). At 24 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of primary patency was 71%, whereas both the secondary patency rate and freedom from target lesion revascularization were 80%. Overall survival amounted to 85%. Freedom from major amputation was 98%, while freedom from surgical conversion was 89%. Degeneration of the vessel wall was observed in 27 lesions (20%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, use of the Eluvia polymer-based DES for the treatment of complex femoropopliteal disease showed promising 2-year results. Nonetheless, a relatively high rate of vessel wall degeneration was observed after DES deployment.

"Low Echoic Area" around stent after bare and drug-coated stenting or stent graft placement for superficial femoral artery disease

Restenosis after stent implantation in femoropopliteal lesions is still big issue. However, restenosis has been reduced by the recent new drug-eluting stent “Eluvia” (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA). However, it was reported that “low echoic area (LEA)” finding around stent by ultrasound that they called “aneurysmal degeneration,” but no blood flow was identified outside the stent was confirmed after Eluvia implantation. In this report, we describe the similar findings that were observed after other types of stents (S.M.A.R.T. bare-nitinol stent (Cordis Corporation, Hialeah, FL, USA), Zilver PTX drug-coated stent (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA), and Viabahn stent graft (W. L. Gore & Associates, Newark, Delaware, USA)) for superficial femoral artery disease. These findings did not change to “aneurysmal change” during the follow-up.

[Interventional Treatments for Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease and Recent Updates]

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) of the femoropopliteal artery is commonly caused by atherosclerosis. It can present with varying clinical symptoms depending on the degree of disease, ranging from intermittent claudication to critical limb ischemia and tissue loss. Therefore, appropriate and timely treatment is required to improve symptoms and salvage the affected limbs. Interventional approaches for femoropopliteal arterial disease commonly include percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, atherectomy, and stent placement. Over the years, endovascular recanalization has been widely performed for treating PAOD due to continuous developments in its techniques and availability of dedicated devices with the inherent advantage of being minimal invasive. In this review, we introduce various types of endovascular treatment methods, discuss the results of clinical research from existing literature, and illustrate the treatment procedures using representative images.

Outcomes of the paclitaxel-eluting Eluvia stent for long femoropopliteal lesions in Asian patients with predominantly chronic limb-threatening ischemia

The fluoropolymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting Eluvia stent has shown promising results for the endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions in patients with claudication. The aim of the current study was to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes of the Eluvia stent for the treatment of long femoropopliteal lesions in Asian patients. This is a single-center, retrospective study. The primary endpoint was primary patency at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were 30-days complication rate, technical success, 1-year freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), limb salvage, survival, amputation-free survival (AFS), wound healing, and clinical improvement. A total of 64 patients with 67 femoropopliteal lesions were included; 78% suffered from diabetes and 84% had chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Of those with ischemic wounds, 79% did not have run-off to the foot. Mean lesion length was 193 ± 128 mm and 52% were severely calcified. Primary patency at 1 year was 84% in the overall cohort and 91% in patients with complete lesion coverage with the Eluvia stent. Technical success was achieved in 100% of the cases and 30-day complications occurred in six patients. Twelve-month freedom from CD-TLR, limb salvage, survival, and AFS were 92%, 93%, 85%, and 80%, respectively. In 80% of patients, complete wound healing was experienced and 84% had clinical improvement after 1 year. The Eluvia stent showed promising 12-month patency and clinical results for femoropopliteal treatment in this CLTI-dominant patient population with severely calcified, long lesions. Patient numbers were, however, small; larger trials are required to validate these findings. Aneurysmal change seen in some cases also needs further investigation.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided endovascular treatment for femoropopliteal artery occlusive disease

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided and angiography-guided intraluminal approach for femoropopliteal (FP) artery occlusive disease.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed using the data collected regarding patients that underwent endovascular treatment (EVT) for FP artery occlusive disease between January 2010 and April 2018 at two centers. A total of 221 consecutive de novo lesions were analyzed according to the method of recanalization. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of recanalization methods for FP occlusive lesions. The prognostic value was analyzed based on the number of guidewires, wire cross time, distal puncture rate, radiation exposure, the amount of contrast media, primary patency, and clinically driven-target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) at 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 44 matched pairs of patients were analyzed after propensity score-matched analysis. The number of guidewires, distal puncture rate, wire passage time, radiation exposure, and the amount of contrast media were significantly lower in the ultrasound-guide group, with 3.4 vs. 4.7, 9.1% vs. 54.5%, 47 min vs. 83 min, 207 mGy vs. 821 mGy, 66 ml vs. 109 ml, respectively (p < .01), but there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of primary patency and CD-TLR.

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrasound-guided EVT for FP occlusive disease significantly reduced the number of guidewires, wire cross time, the rate of distal puncture, radiation exposure, and the amount of contrast media used.

Two-Year Efficacy and Safety Results from the IMPERIAL Randomized Study of the Eluvia Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stent and the Zilver PTX Polymer-free Drug-Coated Stent

PURPOSE

To report additional endpoints, including 2-year primary patency, patient outcomes, and safety results, as well as the initial assessment of hypoechogenic halo from the IMPERIAL Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

IMPERIAL RCT is a prospective, randomized (2:1), multicenter study of patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery lesions (length 30-140 mm, Rutherford category 2-4) treated with the Eluvia paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent or the Zilver PTX paclitaxel-coated stent. Two-year follow-up included patency, safety, and mortality assessments and core laboratory-reviewed B-mode ultrasound imaging to screen for hypoechogenic halo in the stented segment, and assess blood flow.

RESULTS

At 24 months, all-cause mortality was 7.1% (21/295) for Eluvia and 8.3% (12/145) for Zilver PTX (P = 0.6649). The clinically driven target lesion revascularization rate was significantly less for patients treated with Eluvia vs Zilver PTX (12.7% vs 20.1%; P = 0.0495). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of primary patency at 24 months was 83.0% for Eluvia and 77.1% for Zilver PTX (log rank P = 0.1008). Transverse ultrasound imaging was implemented during the 24-month follow-up window and was evaluable for 27.5% (128/465) of patients. Hypoechogenic halo prevalence rates did not differ significantly between Eluvia and Zilver PTX study arms (33.7% [29/86] vs 21.4% [9/42]; P = 0.153). In no case was flow documented within the halo; no adverse events were associated with these ultrasound findings.

CONCLUSION

Two-year follow-up suggests a sustained advantage for Eluvia for avoiding target lesion revascularization. Initial hypoechogenic halo assessment showed no difference in prevalence between the study arms, no flow within the halo, and no associated adverse events.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02574481. Date of registration: October 14, 2015.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1; randomized controlled trial.