Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance During Peripheral Vascular Interventions: Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Costs From the Japanese Perspective

Evaluation of nontarget lesions in femoropopliteal disease using near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound imaging

BACKGROUND

In coronary artery disease (CAD), lipid-core-containing plaque (LCP) in nontarget lesions detected using near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) was related to increased major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with CAD. In the endovascular therapy field, few previous studies using NIRS-IVUS revealed the presence of LCPs in severe stenotic lesions of femoropopliteal disease.

AIM

This study aimed to assess the plaque morphology of nontarget lesions, especially LCPs, and compare it with that of target lesions using NIRS-IVUS in patients with femoropopliteal disease.

METHODS

This single-center prospective observational study included 14 patients who underwent endovascular therapy for FP disease. NIRS-IVUS assessment was performed on the entire FP arterial segment. Forty-one LCP lesions with a maximum lipid-core burden index in any 4-mm region (max LCBI4mm) > 100 were detected using NIRS-IVUS. We evaluated the patient and lesion characteristics. LCP lesions were divided into the target (n = 18) and nontarget (n = 23) lesion groups for comparison.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were notable for advanced age (76.8 ± 6.6 years); high proportion of males (78.7%); and high incidence of hypertension (100%), dyslipidemia (78.6%), diabetes (64.3%). Regarding NIRS findings, the target lesion group exhibited a significantly smaller proportion of LCPs concerning the lesion length (25.9 ± 15.7% vs. 50.6 ± 29.2%, p = 0.002) than the nontarget lesion group. Conversely, there were no significant differences in the value of max LCBI4mm (284.4 ± 153.4 vs. 289.5 ± 113.1, p = 0.90), length of LCP lesion (9.8 ± 9.7 mm vs. 10.7 ± 6.9 mm, p = 0.74), and distribution of LCPs (p = 0.08) between the groups. In addition, the number of LCPs in the target FP artery positively correlated with max LCBI4mm in the target FP artery (r = 0.671, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

NIRS-IVUS findings demonstrated the presence of LCPs in nontarget lesions in patients with FP disease. Moreover, the abundance of LCPs in nontarget lesions was similar to that in target lesions in FP disease.

Adjunctive Utilization of Intravascular Ultrasound in Peripheral Arterial Disease Treatment

BACKGROUND

The utility and benefit of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been well established in coronary interventions, however widespread adoption for peripheral interventions has lagged. The objectives of this review article were to discuss the technical components of IVUS, describe key learning pearls for IVUS utilization, and review the literature describing the clinical outcomes of endovascular peripheral arterial interventions using IVUS.

METHODS

A scoping review of the current literature utilizing Pubmed. Terms used to search the literature included "intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)" in conjunction with "peripheral arterial disease (PAD)," "endovascular interventions," "chronic limb threatening ischemia," "balloon angioplasty" "stenting," "percutaneous coronary intervention," and "outcomes." All types of articles were reviewed including review articles, retrospective reviews, meta-analyses, and prospective observational and randomized studies.

RESULTS

Published literature regarding IVUS use in peripheral arterial interventions is heterogeneous and limited to mainly retrospective studies, registry analyses and metanalyses. Outcomes are generally favorable with the adjunct of IVUS compared to traditional angiography-driven peripheral interventions. The addition of IVUS improves stent expansion, stent patency, and reduces reintervention rates, particularly in infrainguinal arterial lesions. Long-term costs may also be lower with IVUS-guided procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Expert consensus largely supports the implementation of IVUS in endovascular interventions for peripheral arterial disease. However, more robust high-quality data evaluating the efficacy, durability, and cost of IVUS in peripheral arterial disease are still needed.

Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Arterial and Deep Venous Interventions: Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion From SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS

Percutaneous revascularization is the primary strategy for treating lower extremity venous and arterial disease. Angiography is limited by its ability to accurately size vessels, precisely determine the degree of stenosis and length of lesions, characterize lesion morphology, or correctly diagnose postintervention complications. These limitations are overcome with use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). IVUS has demonstrated the ability to improve outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, and there is increasing evidence to support its benefits in the setting of peripheral vascular intervention. At this stage in its evolution, there remains a need to standardize the use and approach to peripheral vascular IVUS imaging. This manuscript represents considerations and consensus perspectives that emerged from a roundtable discussion including 15 physicians with expertise in interventional cardiology, interventional radiology, and vascular surgery, representing 6 cardiovascular specialty societies, held on February 3, 2023. The roundtable's aims were to assess the current state of lower extremity revascularization, identify knowledge gaps and need for evidence, and determine how IVUS can improve care and outcomes for patients with peripheral arterial and deep venous pathology.