Intention to Register as Organ Donors: A Survey of Adolescents

Family discussions and demographic factors influence adolescent's knowledge and attitude towards organ donation after brain death: a questionnaire study

Background

Knowledge and attitude towards organ donation are critical factors influencing organ donation rate. We aimed to assess the knowledge and attitude towards organ donation in adolescents in Austria and Switzerland.

Methods

A paper-based survey was performed in two secondary schools (age range 11–20 years) in Austria and Switzerland. 354/400 surveys were sufficiently answered and analyzed.

Results

Our study found that knowledge on organ donation is scarce in adolescents. Less than 60% of those surveyed thinks that a person is dead when declared brain dead. 84.6% would authorize organ donation after brain death for themselves, but only 69% would authorize organ donation after brain death for a close relative. 93.7% would accept a donor organ if they needed one. Family discussions, rather than school discussions, influenced knowledge on organ donation, the percentage of respondents who have a firm opinion on organ donation and the rate of declaration of this opinion. Age, gender, nationality and religion also influenced knowledge and attitude towards organ donation. Nearly one third of adolescents are of the opinion that selling non-vital organs should be legalized.

Conclusion

Since having had family discussions, a potentially modifiable factor, was positively associated with knowledge and attitude towards organ donation, we postulate that educational programs stimulating family discussions on organ donation may be a promising strategy to increase knowledge.

A Standardized Donor Designation Ratio to Assess the Performance of Driver's License Agencies

Evaluating Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) locations based on the percent of patrons who register as donors does not account for individual characteristics that may influence willingness to donate. We reviewed the driver's licenses of 2997 randomly selected patients at an urban medical system to obtain donor designation, age, gender, and DMV location and linked patient addresses with census tract data on race, ethnicity, income, and education. We then developed a Standardized Donor Designation Ratio (SDDR) (ie, the observed number of donors at each DMV divided by the expected number of donors based on patient demographic characteristics). Overall, 1355 (45%) patients were designated as donors. Donor designation was independently associated with younger age, female gender, nonblack race, and higher income. Across 18 DMVs, the proportion of patients who were donors ranged from 30% to 68% and SDDRs ranged from 0.82 to 1.17. Among the 6 facilities in the lowest tertile by SDDR, 3 were in the lowest tertile by percent donation. In conclusion, there is a great deal of variation across DMVs in rates of organ donor designation. SDDRs that adjust for DMV patron characteristics are distinct measures that may more accurately describe the performance of DMVs in promoting organ donation.

Stability of Organ Donor Designations on Driver's Licenses

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the stability of decisions that people make to be organ donors. We sought to determine the rate of stability of organ donor designations on driver's licenses.

METHODS

With the use of a cross-sectional study design, we reviewed the health records of 2500 randomly selected primary-care patients at a large urban safety-net medical system to obtain their demographic and medical characteristics. We also examined the two most recent unique driver's licenses, state identification cards, or learner's permits that were scanned into electronic health records as part of the patient registration process. We obtained organ donor designations from these documents for each patient.

RESULTS

Of all patients, 1174 (47%) had two driver's licenses, identification cards, or permits in their electronic medical records. The two documents were issued an average of 3.5 years apart. Overall, 114 (10%) patients had differing organ donor designations on their two documents. Among the 502 patients who were designated as organ donors on the first document, 32 (6%) were not designated as organ donors on the second document. Among the 672 patients who were not designated as organ donors on the first document, 82 (12%) were designated as organ donors on the second document. There was little relationship between stability of organ donor designations and patient demographic and medical characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

About 1 of every 10 patients changed their organ donor designation, but stability was not associated with any demographic or medical factors. Further work is needed to understand why individuals change their organ donor designation.

Is Signature Size Associated With Organ Donor Designation on Driver's Licenses?

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies suggest that large signature size is associated with narcissistic characteristics. By contrast, organ donation is an indicator of altruism. Because altruism and narcissism may be viewed as opposites, we sought to determine if smaller signature size is associated with willingness to be an organ donor.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional study design, we reviewed the health records of 571 randomly selected primary care patients at a large urban safety-net medical system to obtain their demographic and medical characteristics. We also examined driver's licenses that were scanned into electronic health records as part of the patient registration process. We measured signature sizes and obtained the organ donor designation from these driver's licenses.

RESULTS

Overall, 256 (45%) patients were designated as donors on their driver's licenses. Signature size averaged 113.3 mm(2) but varied greatly across patients (10th percentile 49.1 mm(2), 90th percentile 226.1 mm(2)). On multivariate analysis, donor designation was positively associated with age 18-34 years, non-black race, having private insurance, and not having any comorbid conditions. However, signature size was not associated with organ donor designation.

CONCLUSIONS

Signature size is not associated with verified organ donor designation. Further work is needed to understand the relationship between personality types and willingness to be an organ donor.

Young Australian Adults' Knowledge and Beliefs about Organ Donation

Context

Limited studies, particularly in Australia, are aimed at understanding young people's beliefs about organ donation. Identification of such beliefs may serve to increase donation decision registration and decision discussion rates among this age cohort.

Objectives

To examine young adults' knowledge about organ donation and to use a theory of planned behavior framework to determine the differences in behavioral, normative, and control beliefs between young adults who had and those who had not registered and discussed their organ donation decision with family or significant others.

Participants

Australian university students (N = 233) completed a questionnaire assessing knowledge about the organ donation process and beliefs related to organ donation decision registration and decision discussion.

Results

Young adults demonstrated knowledge deficits about the support of Western religious denominations for organ donation and the circumstances surrounding donation. Unregistered donors were more likely to focus on the costs of registering; however, no belief-based differences for decision discussion emerged. Young adults who had registered and discussed their decision were more likely to believe that family members and friends thought they should do so. Lack of motivation was reported as preventing registering and discussing, and uncertainty about how and when to raise the topic prevented young adults discussing their donation decision.

Conclusions

Understanding of young adults' knowledge and beliefs enables the development of strategies encouraging donation decision registration and donation decision discussion with family or significant others, thereby increasing the likelihood that the donor's wishes will be carried out.

Reasons for (not) Signing the State Registry: Surveying Department of Motor Vehicles Customers in New York State

Context

Prior research examining rationales for enrolling as an organ donor is biased because of its reliance on college student samples and retrospective recall.

Objective

To characterize New York state residents' registry enrollment decisions in close proximity to a registration opportunity.

Design

Surveys were conducted with customers exiting Department of Motor Vehicle offices.

Participants

A total of 1325 customers were surveyed upon exiting 1 of 18 Department of Motor Vehicle offices spanning 9 counties.

Main Outcome Measure

Customers making donation-relevant transactions (ie, license renewal/registration) reported whether they had registered as a donor that day, and all other customers reported whether they had registered as a donor in the past. Customers reported reasons to justify their enrollment decision through short interview questions.

Results

Among current donation-relevant transactions (n = 299), 27% reported enrolling in the registry. Of remaining customers, 39% reported enrolling in the state registry in the past. For those who elected not to enroll, many failed to communicate a reason for their decision, or reported a lack of opportunity to sign or decisional uncertainty. Among enrollees, reasons for registration included the altruistic benefits of donation, prior registration, personal experience with donation, and rational arguments for donation.

Conclusion

The value of point-of-decision survey data are discussed in relation to strategic efforts to promote organ donor registration.

A student leadership model for promoting educational programs in organ donation and transplantation

The global organ shortage is the strongest factor for the increase in transplant wait time and deaths on waitlists. Here we describe a model for involving high school students in education research around organ donation and transplantation and capitalize on the strength of a pre-existing educational program offered by the local organ procurement organization (OPO). While training in education research at Cleveland Clinic, a high school student embarked on a collaborative project with the local OPO. The project involved evaluating three educational programs, selecting the most appropriate program for administration at her school, coordinating with the student's school administration and teachers, administering an assessment tool for the effectiveness of the program, and analyzing the results. The local OPO program that was selected for implementation consisted of a video presentation entitled "Share your life, share your decision" prepared by the United States Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), lectures by invited speakers and an educational assessment (pre- and post-education). The assessment survey included 3 multiple choice and 7 true/false questions. Compared to the over 2500 programs administered in the last 5 years by the local OPO, this program had a higher volume of participation (n = 353 compared to an average of 150 students/day). Students correctly classified transplantation status of more organ and tissues post-education (P < .0001 for both). For 5 out of the 7 true/false questions, students correctly answered questions more frequently post-education (P ≤ .002 for all). This experience included for the first time a formal assessment of the program which will be utilized to address targeted areas for specific improvements. This student collaborative model of involving students in organ donation and transplantation related education research has the potential to promote and maximize the effectiveness of educational programs targeting their peers.

Anything but the eyes: culture, identity, and the selective refusal of corneal donation

At the time that a patient is diagnosed as brain dead, a substantial proportion of families who give consent to heart and kidney donation specifically refuse eye donation. This in part may relate to the failure of those involved in transplantation medicine and public education to fully appreciate the different meanings attached to the body of a recently deceased person. Medicine and science have long understood the body as a "machine." This view has fitted with medical notions of transplantation, with donors being a source of biologic "goods." However, even a cursory glance at the rituals surrounding death makes it apparent that there is more to a dead body than simply its biologic parts; in death, bodies continue as the physical substrate of relationships. Of all the organs, it is the eyes that are identified as the site of sentience, and there is a long tradition of visual primacy and visual symbolism in virtually all aspects of culture. It therefore seems likely that of all the body parts, it is the eyes that are most central to social relationships. A request to donate the eyes therefore is unlikely to be heard simply in medical terms as a request to donate a "superfluous" body part for the benefit of another. That the eyes are not simply biologic provides one explanation for both the lower rates of corneal donation, compared with that of other organs, and the lack of adequate corneal donation to meet demand.

Organ Donation and Hispanic American High School Students: Attitudes, Beliefs, Perceptions, and Intent to Donate

The growing need for transplantable organs continues to outpace supply. This discrepancy is most pronounced in minority populations. Hispanic Americans, however, are significantly less likely to donate their organs for reasons that remain poorly understood. We sought to identify factors that influence Hispanic American high school students’ intent to donate organs. A prospective observational study was conducted in five Los Angeles high schools within four separate zip codes known for a high percentage of Hispanic Americans. High school students, ages 15 to 20 years, were surveyed to assess demographic factors, cultural factors, awareness and knowledge, perception, and belief regarding organ donation and the intent to donate. A total of 5444 surveys were collected over a 4-month period. After logistic regression analysis, independent risk factors for predicting the intent to donate were: family support, 11th and 12th grade high school students, being female, religion, and the belief that Hispanics are more likely to need an organ transplant. This study represents the largest study to date examining factors associated with the intent to donate in Hispanic American high school students. To address the organ shortage crisis in Hispanic Americans, these risk factors should be considered using specific, effective educational programs.

Choosing to be a designated organ donor on their first driver's license: actions, opinions, intentions, and barriers of Asian American and Pacific Islander adolescents in Hawaii

CONTEXT

The factors associated with Asian American and Pacific Islander adolescents' decision to be a designated organ donor on their first driver's license are largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess knowledge and attitudes about organ donation and sociocultural factors associated with designated organ donor status in Asian American and Pacific Islander youth in Hawaii.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Written surveys and focus groups were conducted at high schools and churches.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred eight Asian American and Pacific Islander teens, mean age 16 (SD, 2) years, 52.6% females, and 53.4% Catholic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Donor status on driver's license, awareness, attitudes, intentions, and barriers to becoming a designated organ donor.

RESULTS

Eighteen percent of teens with a driver's license are designated organ donors. Twenty-one percent have talked to their parents about becoming a designated donor on their license. Of those without a license, 27.7% intended to become a designated donor. Sex, grade level, and immigrant status were not associated with designated organ donor status; however, Catholics were significantly less likely to be donors. Key barriers to being a designated donor included a lack of knowledge or misperceptions due to urban myths about organ donation, parents completing "organ donor" question on driver's license application, and not wanting to have their body "cut up."

CONCLUSIONS

Future organ donor campaigns should educate ethnic minority adolescents about the importance of becoming a designated organ donor on their first driver's license and counter urban myths about deceased organ donation. Guidelines for how to initiate family discussions about organ donation should be sensitive to cultural and religious beliefs.

A multidisciplinary organ donor council and performance improvement initiative can improve donation outcomes

The shortage of organs available for transplantation has become a national crisis. The Department of Health and Human Services established performance benchmarks for timely notification, donation after cardiac death (DCD), and conversion rates (total donors/eligible deaths) to guide organ procurement organizations and donor hospitals in their attempts to increase the number of transplantable organs. In January 2007, an organ donor council (ODC) with an ongoing performance improvement case review process was created at a Level I trauma center. A critical care devastating brain injury protocol and a DCD policy were instituted. Best performance benchmarks were evaluated before and after establishment of the ODC. At our center, the total number of referrals increased from 96 in 2006 to 139 in 2007 and 143 in 2008. Timely notification rate increased from 64 per cent in 2006 to 83 per cent in 2007 and 2008 (P < 0.01). DCD rate increased from 0 per cent in 2006 to 13 per cent in 2007 (P = 0.06) and 10 per cent in 2008 (P = 0.09). Conversion rate increased from 53 per cent in 2007 to 78 per cent in 2008 (P = 0.05) and 73 per cent in 2009 (P = 0.16). Organs transplanted per eligible death trended upward from 1.80 in 2007 to 2.54 in 2009 (P = 0.20). As a consequence, the establishment of a multidisciplinary ODC and performance improvement initiative demonstrated improved donation outcomes.

Choosing to Be a Designated Organ Donor on Their First Driver's License: Actions, Opinions, Intentions, and Barriers of Asian American and Pacific Islander Adolescents in Hawaii

Context

The factors associated with Asian American and Pacific Islander adolescents' decision to be a designated organ donor on their first driver's license are largely unknown.

Objective

To assess knowledge and attitudes about organ donation and socio-cultural factors associated with designated organ donor status in Asian American and Pacific Islander youth in Hawaii.

Design and Setting

Written surveys and focus groups were conducted at high schools and churches.

Participants

Two hundred eight Asian American and Pacific Islander teens, mean age 16 (SD, 2) years, 52.6% females, and 53.4% Catholic.

Main Outcome Measures

Donor status on driver's license, awareness, attitudes, intentions, and barriers to becoming a designated organ donor.

Results

Eighteen percent of teens with a driver's license are designated organ donors. Twenty-one percent have talked to their parents about becoming a designated donor on their license. Of those without a license, 27.7% intended to become a designated donor. Sex, grade level, and immigrant status were not associated with designated organ donor status; however, Catholics were significantly less likely to be donors. Key barriers to being a designated donor included a lack of knowledge or misperceptions due to urban myths about organ donation, parents completing “organ donor” question on driver's license application, and not wanting to have their body “cut up.”

Conclusions

Future organ donor campaigns should educate ethnic minority adolescents about the importance of becoming a designated organ donor on their first driver's license and counter urban myths about deceased organ donation. Guidelines for how to initiate family discussions about organ donation should be sensitive to cultural and religious beliefs.

The combination of an online organ and tissue registry with a public education campaign can increase the number of organs available for transplantation

BACKGROUND

A persistent shortage of organs and inexhaustible waiting lists continue to result in many people dying while awaiting transplantation. On July 1, 2006, the California Department of Motor Vehicles joined forces with California's Online Organ and Tissue Registry and launched a campaign to increase donation rates. This campaign included intense public and media education. The efficacy of such a campaign on donor demographics has not been studied.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was conducted of organ donor referrals and donations from all southern California hospitals covered by a regional organ procurement agency. Organ donor demographics from 2 years before (pretime: 2004-2005) and 2 years after (posttime: 2007-2008) were compared.

RESULTS

Pretime included 6,112 referrals, 1,548 potential donors with 696 actual donors. Posttime included 7,119 referrals, 1,409 potential donors, and 699 actual donors. Consent for donation improved to 51.0% from 47.5% (p = 0.064), family decline decreased to 32.6% from 44.1% (p < 0.0001), and conversion rates improved to 49.6% from 45.0% (p = 0.011). Coroners also declined donation less frequently during posttime (1.8% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.004). Extended criteria donors improved to 9.5% from 3.8% (p < 0.0001), and donor after cardiac death improved to 3.0% from 1.4% (p = 0.002). A decrease in organs per donor was noted (3.57% vs. 3.14%, p < 0.0001) most likely because of the increase in extended criteria donors and donor after cardiac death.

CONCLUSIONS

Public and media education significantly improved organ donor demographics. Although this study compares only 2 years before with 2 years after the donation campaign, the results are extremely favorable. Therefore, a public donation campaign and an organ donor registry are effective promotions that could help increase the number of organs available for transplantation.