1
|
Nangia S, Gaikwad U, Joshua P, Mookaiah M, Burela N, Thirumalai A, Chilukuri S, Gayen S, Karra AR, Sharma DS. Dosimetric benefits of customised mouth-bite for head neck cancer patients undergoing modern proton therapy - An audit. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2024; 31:100265. [PMID: 39224831 PMCID: PMC11367092 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Revised: 07/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and aims Proton therapy (PRT) for Head Neck Cancer (HNC), in view of the Bragg peak, spares critical structures like oral mucosa better than IMRT. In PRT, mouth-bites, besides immobilising and separating mucosal surfaces, may also negate the end-of-range effect. We retrospectively analysed the details and dosimetric impact of mouth-bites in PRT for HNC. Materials and methods The data of consecutive HNC patients treated with IMPT from May 2020 to August 2022 were studied retrospectively. Details of the mouth-bite used, compliance and resultant mucosal separation were noted. Further analysis, restricted to previously unirradiated patients, comprised volumetric dosimetric data pertaining to the mouth-bite and distal mucosal surfaces. High LET zones, corresponding to 6-12 keV/micron, for mouth-bite doses above 30 Gy, were recalculated from existing plans. Results A mouth-bite was used in 69 of 80 consecutively treated patients, ranging from 8 to 42 mm in thickness, and 12 to 52 mm in the resultant mucosal sparing. In 42 patients in whom the mouth-bite V 32 Gy was > 0, median Dmean, absolute V32, V39, V50 and V60 GyE (Gray Equivalent) of the mouth bite was 35.65 GyE (Range: 2.65 - 60 GyE), 10 cc (Range: 0.1 - 32 cc), 7.6 cc (Range: 0.1 - 30.8 cc), 5.7 cc (Range: 0.2 - 29.2 cc) and 1.45 cc (Range: 0.2 - 18.1 cc) respectively, all significantly more than the spared adjacent mucosal surface. In absence of a mouth-bite, the spared mucosa would have at least partially received the high dose received by the mouth-bite. High LET zones were noted in 12 of 48 mouth-bites. Conclusion In PRT for HNC, mouth-bites play a vital role in improving the sparing of mucosa outside the target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sapna Nangia
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Utpal Gaikwad
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Krupamai Cancer Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
| | - Patrick Joshua
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Minnal Mookaiah
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Nagarjuna Burela
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Anusha Thirumalai
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Srinivas Chilukuri
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Sanjib Gayen
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Ashok Reddy Karra
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Dayananda S. Sharma
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Corrao G, Marvaso G, Mastroleo F, Biffi A, Pellegrini G, Minari S, Vincini MG, Zaffaroni M, Zerini D, Volpe S, Gaito S, Mazzola GC, Bergamaschi L, Cattani F, Petralia G, Musi G, Ceci F, De Cobelli O, Orecchia R, Alterio D, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Photon vs proton hypofractionation in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110264. [PMID: 38561122 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-level evidence on hypofractionated proton therapy (PT) for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) patients is currently missing. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic literature review to compare the toxicity and effectiveness of curative radiotherapy with photon therapy (XRT) or PT in PCa. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to April 2022. Men with a diagnosis of PCa who underwent curative hypofractionated RT treatment (PT or XRT) were included. Risk of grade (G) ≥ 2 acute and late genitourinary (GU) OR gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were the primary outcomes of interest. Secondary outcomes were five-year biochemical relapse-free survival (b-RFS), clinical relapse-free, distant metastasis-free, and prostate cancer-specific survival. Heterogeneity between study-specific estimates was assessed using Chi-square statistics and measured with the I2 index (heterogeneity measure across studies). RESULTS A total of 230 studies matched inclusion criteria and, due to overlapped populations, 160 were included in the present analysis. Significant lower rates of G ≥ 2 acute GI incidence (2 % vs 7 %) and improved 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (95 % vs 91 %) were observed in the PT arm compared to XRT. PT benefits in 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival were maintained for the moderate hypofractionated arm (p-value 0.0122) and among patients in intermediate and low-risk classes (p-values < 0.0001 and 0.0368, respectively). No statistically relevant differences were found for the other considered outcomes. CONCLUSION The present study supports that PT is safe and effective for localized PCa treatment, however, more data from RCTs are needed to draw solid evidence in this setting and further effort must be made to identify the patient subgroups that could benefit the most from PT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Mastroleo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Annalisa Biffi
- National Centre of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Pellegrini
- National Centre of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Samuele Minari
- National Centre of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Dario Zerini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Simona Gaito
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Luca Bergamaschi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pirlepesov F, Wilson L, Moskvin VP, Breuer A, Parkins F, Lucas JT, Merchant TE, Faught AM. Three-dimensional dose and LET D prediction in proton therapy using artificial neural networks. Med Phys 2022; 49:7417-7427. [PMID: 36227617 PMCID: PMC9872814 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Challenges in proton therapy include identifying patients most likely to benefit; ensuring consistent, high-quality plans as its adoption becomes more widespread; and recognizing biological uncertainties that may be related to increased relative biologic effectiveness driven by linear energy transfer (LET). Knowledge-based planning (KBP) is a domain that may help to address all three. METHODS Artificial neural networks were trained using 117 unique treatment plans and associated dose and dose-weighted LET (LETD ) distributions. The data set was split into training (n = 82), validation (n = 17), and test (n = 18) sets. Model performance was evaluated on the test set using dose- and LETD -volume metrics in the clinical target volume (CTV) and nearby organs at risk and Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) comparing predicted and planned isodose lines at 50%, 75%, and 95% of the prescription dose. RESULTS Dose-volume metrics significantly differed (α = 0.05) between predicted and planned dose distributions in only one dose-volume metric, D2% to the CTV. The maximum observed root mean square (RMS) difference between corresponding metrics was 4.3 GyRBE (8% of prescription) for D1cc to optic chiasm. DSC were 0.90, 0.93, and 0.88 for the 50%, 75%, and 95% isodose lines, respectively. LETD -volume metrics significantly differed in all but one metric, L0.1cc of the brainstem. The maximum observed difference in RMS differences for LETD metrics was 1.0 keV/μm for L0.1cc to brainstem. CONCLUSIONS We have devised the first three-dimensional dose and LETD -prediction model for cranial proton radiation therapy has been developed. Dose accuracy compared favorably with that of previously published models in other treatment sites. The agreement in LETD supports future investigations with biological doses in mind to enable the full potential of KBP in proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fakhriddin Pirlepesov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude
Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN,
38105-3678
| | - Lydia Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude
Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN,
38105-3678
| | - Vadim P. Moskvin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude
Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN,
38105-3678
| | - Alex Breuer
- Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s
Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-3678
| | - Franz Parkins
- Department of Information Services, St. Jude
Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN,
38105-3678
| | - John T. Lucas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude
Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN,
38105-3678
| | - Thomas E. Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude
Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN,
38105-3678
| | - Austin M. Faught
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude
Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN,
38105-3678
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Matsuya Y, Kai T, Parisi A, Yoshii Y, Sato T. Application of a simple DNA damage model developed for electrons to proton irradiation. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac9a20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Proton beam therapy allows irradiating tumor volumes with reduced side effects on normal tissues with respect to conventional x-ray radiotherapy. Biological effects such as cell killing after proton beam irradiations depend on the proton kinetic energy, which is intrinsically related to early DNA damage induction. As such, DNA damage estimation based on Monte Carlo simulations is a research topic of worldwide interest. Such simulation is a mean of investigating the mechanisms of DNA strand break formations. However, past modellings considering chemical processes and DNA structures require long calculation times. Particle and heavy ion transport system (PHITS) is one of the general-purpose Monte Carlo codes that can simulate track structure of protons, meanwhile cannot handle radical dynamics simulation in liquid water. It also includes a simple model enabling the efficient estimation of DNA damage yields only from the spatial distribution of ionizations and excitations without DNA geometry, which was originally developed for electron track-structure simulations. In this study, we investigated the potential application of the model to protons without any modification. The yields of single-strand breaks, double-strand breaks (DSBs) and the complex DSBs were assessed as functions of the proton kinetic energy. The PHITS-based estimation showed that the DSB yields increased as the linear energy transfer (LET) increased, and reproduced the experimental and simulated yields of various DNA damage types induced by protons with LET up to about 30 keV μm−1. These results suggest that the current DNA damage model implemented in PHITS is sufficient for estimating DNA lesion yields induced after protons irradiation except at very low energies (below 1 MeV). This model contributes to evaluating early biological impacts in radiation therapy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Faught AM, Wilson LJ, Gargone M, Pirlepesov F, Moskvin VP, Hua C. Treatment-planning approaches to intensity modulated proton therapy and the impact on dose-weighted linear energy transfer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 24:e13782. [PMID: 36161765 PMCID: PMC9859995 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We quantified the effect of various forward-based treatment-planning strategies in proton therapy on dose-weighted linear energy transfer (LETd). By maintaining the dosimetric quality at a clinically acceptable level, we aimed to evaluate the differences in LETd among various treatment-planning approaches and their practicality in minimizing biologic uncertainties associated with LETd. METHOD Eight treatment-planning strategies that are achievable in commercial treatment-planning systems were applied on a cylindrical water phantom and four pediatric brain tumor cases. Each planning strategy was compared to either an opposed lateral plan (phantom study) or original clinical plan (patient study). Deviations in mean and maximum LETd from clinically acceptable dose distributions were compared. RESULTS In the phantom study, using a range shifter and altering the robust scenarios during optimization had the largest effect on the mean clinical target volume LETd, which was reduced from 4.5 to 3.9 keV/μm in both cases. Variations in the intersection angle between beams had the largest effect on LETd in a ring defined 3 to 5 mm outside the target. When beam intersection angles were reduced from opposed laterals (180°) to 120°, 90°, and 60°, corresponding maximum LETd increased from 7.9 to 8.9, 10.9, and 12.2 keV/μm, respectively. A clear trend in mean and maximum LETd variations in the clinical cases could not be established, though spatial distribution of LETd suggested a strong dependence on patient anatomy and treatment geometry. CONCLUSION Changes in LETd from treatment-plan setup follow intuitive trends in a controlled phantom experiment. Anatomical and other patient-specific considerations, however, can preclude generalizable strategies in clinical cases. For pediatric cranial radiation therapy, we recommend using opposed lateral treatment fields to treat midline targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin M. Faught
- Department of Radiation OncologySt. Jude Children's Research HospitalMemphisTennesseeUSA
| | - Lydia J. Wilson
- Department of Radiation OncologySt. Jude Children's Research HospitalMemphisTennesseeUSA
| | - Melissa Gargone
- Department of Radiation OncologySt. Jude Children's Research HospitalMemphisTennesseeUSA
| | - Fakhriddin Pirlepesov
- Department of Radiation OncologySt. Jude Children's Research HospitalMemphisTennesseeUSA
| | - Vadim P. Moskvin
- Department of Radiation OncologySt. Jude Children's Research HospitalMemphisTennesseeUSA
| | - Chia‐Ho Hua
- Department of Radiation OncologySt. Jude Children's Research HospitalMemphisTennesseeUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Frame CM, Chen Y, Gagnon J, Yuan Y, Ma T, Dritschilo A, Pang D. Proton induced DNA double strand breaks at the Bragg peak: Evidence of enhanced LET effect. Front Oncol 2022; 12:930393. [PMID: 35992825 PMCID: PMC9388940 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.930393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeTo investigate DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) induced by therapeutic proton beams in plateau and Bragg peak to demonstrate DSB induction due to the higher LET in the Bragg peak.Materials and MethodspUC19 plasmid DNA samples were irradiated to doses of 1000 and 3000 Gy on a Mevion S250i proton system with a monoenergetic, 110 MeV, proton beam at depths of 2 and 9.4 cm, corresponding to a position on the plateau and distal Bragg peak of the beam, respectively. The irradiated DNA samples were imaged by atomic force microscopy for visualization of individual DNA molecules, either broken or intact, and quantification of the DNA fragment length distributions for each of the irradiated samples. Percentage of the broken DNA and average number of DSBs per DNA molecule were obtained.ResultsCompared to irradiation effects in the plateau region, DNA irradiated at the Bragg peak sustained more breakage at the same dose, yielding more short DNA fragments and higher numbers of DSB per DNA molecule.ConclusionThe higher LET of proton beams at the Bragg peak results in more densely distributed DNA DSBs, which supports an underlying mechanism for the increased cell killing by protons at the Bragg peak.
Collapse
|
7
|
Li H. Biological effectiveness and relative biological effectiveness of ion beams for in-vitro cell irradiation. Cancer Sci 2022; 113:2807-2813. [PMID: 35642350 PMCID: PMC9357665 DOI: 10.1111/cas.15446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Biological effectiveness and relative biological effectiveness are critical for proton and ion beam radiotherapy. However, the relationship between the two quantities and physical character of ion beams is not well established. By analyzing 1188 sets of in‐vitro cell irradiation experiments using ion beams ranging from protons to 238U, compiled by the Particle Irradiation Data Ensemble (PIDE) project, the biological effectiveness of the ion beams, with cell survival fractionation (SF) as the endpoint, was found to be dependent on the fluence and linear energy transfer (LET) of the ion beam. Consequently, the relative biological effectiveness of the ion beam to photon beam was also established as a function of LET. A common form of relationship among SF, fluence, and LET was found to be valid for all ion beam experiments. The close form relationship could be used for proton and ion beam radiotherapy applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Favaudon V, Labarbe R, Limoli CL. Model studies of the role of oxygen in the FLASH effect. Med Phys 2022; 49:2068-2081. [PMID: 34407219 PMCID: PMC8854455 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Current radiotherapy facilities are standardized to deliver dose rates around 0.1-0.4 Gy/s in 2 Gy daily fractions, designed to deliver total accumulated doses to reach the tolerance limit of normal tissues undergoing irradiation. FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT), on the other hand, relies on facilities capable of delivering ultrahigh dose rates in large doses in a single microsecond pulse, or in a few pulses given over a very short time sequence. For example, most studies to date have implemented 4-6 MeV electrons with intra-pulse dose rates in the range 106 -107 Gy/s. The proposed dependence of the FLASH effect on oxygen tension has stimulated several theoretical models based on three different hypotheses: (i) Radiation-induced transient oxygen depletion; (ii) cell-specific differences in the ability to detoxify and/or recover from injury caused by reactive oxygen species; (iii) self-annihilation of radicals by bimolecular recombination. This article focuses on the observations supporting or refuting these models in the frame of the chemical-biological bases of the impact of oxygen on the radiation response of cell free, in vitro and in vivo model systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Favaudon
- Institut Curie, Inserm U 1021- CNRS UMR 3347, University Paris-Saclay, PSL Research University, Centre Universitaire, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
- Corresponding author:
| | - Rudi Labarbe
- Ion Beam Applications S.A. (IBA), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Charles L. Limoli
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Medical Sciences I, B146B, Irvine, California 92697-2695, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
A pilot study of a novel method to visualize three-dimensional dose distribution on skin surface images to evaluate radiation dermatitis. Sci Rep 2022; 12:2729. [PMID: 35177737 PMCID: PMC8854641 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06713-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Predicting the radiation dose‒toxicity relationship is important for local tumor control and patients’ quality of life. We developed a first intuitive evaluation system that directly matches the three-dimensional (3D) dose distribution with the skin surface image of patients with radiation dermatitis (RD) to predict RD in patients undergoing radiotherapy. Using an RGB-D camera, 82 3D skin surface images (3DSSIs) were acquired from 19 patients who underwent radiotherapy. 3DSSI data acquired included 3D skin surface shape and optical imaging of the area where RD occurs. Surface registration between 3D skin dose (3DSD) and 3DSSI is performed using the iterative closest point algorithm, then reconstructed as a two-dimensional color image. The developed system successfully matched 3DSSI and 3DSD, and visualized the planned dose distribution onto the patient's RD image. The dose distribution pattern was consistent with the occurrence pattern of RD. This new approach facilitated the evaluation of the direct correlation between skin-dose distribution and RD and, therefore, provides a potential to predict the probability of RD and thereby decrease RD severity by enabling informed treatment decision making by physicians. However, the results need to be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size.
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang C, Uh J, Merchant TE, Hua CH, Acharya S. Facilitating MR-Guided Adaptive Proton Therapy in Children Using Deep Learning-Based Synthetic CT. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:11-20. [PMID: 35127971 PMCID: PMC8768893 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00099.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To determine whether self-attention cycle-generative adversarial networks (cycle-GANs), a novel deep-learning method, can generate accurate synthetic computed tomography (sCT) to facilitate adaptive proton therapy in children with brain tumors.
Materials and Methods
Both CT and T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 125 children (ages 1-20 years) with brain tumors were included in the training dataset. A model introducing a self-attention mechanism into the conventional cycle-GAN was created to enhance tissue interfaces and reduce noise. The test dataset consisted of 7 patients (ages 2-14 years) who underwent adaptive planning because of changes in anatomy discovered on MRI during proton therapy. The MRI during proton therapy-based sCT was compared with replanning CT (ground truth).
Results
The Hounsfield unit-mean absolute error was significantly reduced with self-attention cycle-GAN, as compared with conventional cycle-GAN (65.3 ± 13.9 versus 88.9 ± 19.3, P < .01). The average 3-dimensional gamma passing rates (2%/2 mm criteria) for the original plan on the anatomy of the day and for the adapted plan were high (97.6% ± 1.2% and 98.9 ± 0.9%, respectively) when using sCT generated by self-attention cycle-GAN. The mean absolute differences in clinical target volume (CTV) receiving 95% of the prescription dose and 80% distal falloff along the beam axis were 1.1% ± 0.8% and 1.1 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. Areas of greatest dose difference were distal to the CTV and corresponded to shifts in distal falloff. Plan adaptation was appropriately triggered in all test patients when using sCT.
Conclusion
The novel cycle-GAN model with self-attention outperforms conventional cycle-GAN for children with brain tumors. Encouraging dosimetric results suggest that sCT generation can be used to identify patients who would benefit from adaptive replanning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jinsoo Uh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Thomas E. Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Chia-ho Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Sahaja Acharya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ahmadi Ganjeh Z, Eslami-Kalantari M, Ebrahimi Loushab M, Mowlavi AA. Calculation of direct DNA damages by a new approach for carbon ions and protons using Geant4-DNA. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
12
|
Khachonkham S, Mara E, Gruber S, Preuer R, Kuess P, Dörr W, Georg D, Clausen M. RBE variation in prostate carcinoma cells in active scanning proton beams: In-vitro measurements in comparison with phenomenological models. Phys Med 2020; 77:187-193. [PMID: 32871460 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In-vitro radiobiological studies are essential for modelling the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in proton therapy. The purpose of this study was to experimentally determine the RBE values in proton beams along the beam path for human prostate carcinoma cells (Du-145). RBE-dose and RBE-LETd (dose-averaged linear energy transfer) dependencies were investigated and three phenomenological RBE models, i.e. McNamara, Rørvik and Wilkens were benchmarked for this cell line. METHODS Cells were placed at multiple positions along the beam path, employing an in-house developed solid phantom. The experimental setup reflected the clinical prostate treatment scenario in terms of field size, depth, and required proton energies (127.2-180.1 MeV) and the physical doses from 0.5 to 6 Gy were delivered. The reference irradiation was performed with 200 kV X-ray beams. Respective (α/β) values were determined using the linear quadratic model and LETd was derived from the treatment planning system at the exact location of cells. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Independent of the cell survival level, all experimental RBE values were consistently higher in the target than the generic clinical RBE value of 1.1; with the lowest RBE value of 1.28 obtained at the beginning of the SOBP. A systematic RBE decrease with increasing dose was observed for the investigated dose range. The RBE values from all three applied models were considerably smaller than the experimental values. A clear increase of experimental RBE values with LETd parameter suggests that proton LET must be taken into consideration for this low (α/β) tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suphalak Khachonkham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria; Division of Radiation Therapy, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Elisabeth Mara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria; University of Applied Science Wiener, Neustadt, Austria
| | - Sylvia Gruber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Rafael Preuer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Kuess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria; MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Dörr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria; MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Monika Clausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Proton therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: A review of the physical and clinical challenges. Radiother Oncol 2020; 147:30-39. [PMID: 32224315 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The quality of radiation therapy has been shown to significantly influence the outcomes for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. The results of dosimetric studies suggest that intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) could be of added value for HNSCC by being more effective than intensity-modulated (photon) radiation therapy (IMRT) for reducing side effects of radiation therapy. However, the physical properties of protons make IMPT more sensitive than photons to planning uncertainties. This could potentially have a negative effect on the quality of IMPT planning and delivery. For this review, the three French proton therapy centers collaborated to evaluate the differences between IMRT and IMPT. The review explored the effects of these uncertainties and their management for developing a robust and optimized IMPT treatment delivery plan to achieve clinical outcomes that are superior to those for IMRT. We also provide practical suggestions for the management of HNSCC carcinoma with IMPT. Because metallic dental implants can increase range uncertainties (3-10%), patient preparation for IMPT may require more systematic removal of in-field alien material than is done for IMRT. Multi-energy CT may be an alternative to calculate more accurately the dose distribution. The practical aspects that we describe are essential to guarantee optimal quality in radiation therapy in both model-based and randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
|
14
|
Beddok A, Vela A, Calugaru V, Tessonnier T, Kubes J, Dutheil P, Gérard A, Vidal M, Goudjil F, Florescu C, Kammerer E, Bénézery K, Hérault J, Bourhis J, Thariat J. [Proton therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: From physics to clinic]. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:439-448. [PMID: 31358445 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is presently the recommended technique for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck carcinomas. Proton therapy would allow to reduce the volume of irradiated normal tissue and, thus, to decrease the risk of late dysphagia, xerostomia, dysgeusia and hypothyroidism. An exhaustive research was performed with the search engine PubMed by focusing on the papers about the physical difficulties that slow down use of proton therapy for head and neck carcinomas. Range uncertainties in proton therapy (±3 %) paradoxically limit the use of the steep dose gradient in distality. Calibration uncertainties can be important in the treatment of head and neck cancer in the presence of materials of uncertain stoichiometric composition (such as with metal implants, dental filling, etc.) and complex heterogeneities. Dental management for example may be different with IMRT or proton therapy. Some uncertainties can be somewhat minimized at the time of optimization. Inter- and intrafractional variations and uncertainties in Hounsfield units/stopping power can be integrated in a robust optimization process. Additional changes in patient's anatomy (tumour shrinkage, changes in skin folds in the beam patch, large weight loss or gain) require rescanning. Dosimetric and small clinical studies comparing photon and proton therapy have well shown the interest of proton therapy for head and neck cancers. Intensity-modulated proton therapy is a promising treatment as it can reduce the substantial toxicity burden of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma compared to IMRT. Robust optimization will allow to perform an optimal treatment and to use proton therapy in current clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Beddok
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - A Vela
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France; Advanced Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - V Calugaru
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - T Tessonnier
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France; Advanced Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - J Kubes
- Proton Therapy Centre Czech, Prague, République tchèque
| | - P Dutheil
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France; Advanced Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - A Gérard
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, 33, avenue Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - M Vidal
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, 33, avenue Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - F Goudjil
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - C Florescu
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France; Advanced Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - E Kammerer
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France; Advanced Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - K Bénézery
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, 33, avenue Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - J Hérault
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, 33, avenue Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - J Bourhis
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois, Lausanne, Suisse
| | - J Thariat
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France; Advanced Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Laboratoire de physique corpusculaire IN2P3/Ensicaen - UMR6534, Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France.
| | -
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France; Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France; Proton Therapy Centre Czech, Prague, République tchèque; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, 33, avenue Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France; Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois, Lausanne, Suisse; Laboratoire de physique corpusculaire IN2P3/Ensicaen - UMR6534, Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Xiao AY, Maynard MR, Piett CG, Nagel ZD, Alexander JS, Kevil CG, Berridge MV, Pattillo CB, Rosen LR, Miriyala S, Harrison L. Sodium sulfide selectively induces oxidative stress, DNA damage, and mitochondrial dysfunction and radiosensitizes glioblastoma (GBM) cells. Redox Biol 2019; 26:101220. [PMID: 31176262 PMCID: PMC6556549 DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Revised: 05/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) has a poor prognosis despite intensive treatment with surgery and chemoradiotherapy. Previous studies using dose-escalated radiotherapy have demonstrated improved survival; however, increased rates of radionecrosis have limited its use. Development of radiosensitizers could improve patient outcome. In the present study, we report the use of sodium sulfide (Na2S), a hydrogen sulfide (H2S) donor, to selectively kill GBM cells (T98G and U87) while sparing normal human cerebral microvascular endothelial cells (hCMEC/D3). Na2S also decreased mitochondrial respiration, increased oxidative stress and induced γH2AX foci and oxidative base damage in GBM cells. Since Na2S did not significantly alter T98G capacity to perform non-homologous end-joining or base excision repair, it is possible that GBM cell killing could be attributed to increased damage induction due to enhanced reactive oxygen species production. Interestingly, Na2S enhanced mitochondrial respiration, produced a more reducing environment and did not induce high levels of DNA damage in hCMEC/D3. Taken together, this data suggests involvement of mitochondrial respiration in Na2S toxicity in GBM cells. The fact that survival of LN-18 GBM cells lacking mitochondrial DNA (ρ0) was not altered by Na2S whereas the survival of LN-18 ρ+ cells was compromised supports this conclusion. When cells were treated with Na2S and photon or proton radiation, GBM cell killing was enhanced, which opens the possibility of H2S being a radiosensitizer. Therefore, this study provides the first evidence that H2S donors could be used in GBM therapy to potentiate radiation-induced killing. Sodium sulfide selectively kills GBM cells by inducing DNA damage. Sodium sulfide induces mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in GBM cells. Toxicity to sodium sulfide is dependent on mitochondrial respiration. Sodium sulfide radiosensitizes GBM cells to photon and proton radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Y Xiao
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, 71130, USA
| | - Matthew R Maynard
- Radiation Oncology, Willis-Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA
| | - Cortt G Piett
- Harvard University, School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Zachary D Nagel
- Harvard University, School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - J Steven Alexander
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, 71130, USA
| | - Christopher G Kevil
- Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, 71130, USA
| | | | - Christopher B Pattillo
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, 71130, USA
| | - Lane R Rosen
- Radiation Oncology, Willis-Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA
| | - Sumitra Miriyala
- Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, 71130, USA
| | - Lynn Harrison
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, 71130, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Haas-Kogan D, Indelicato D, Paganetti H, Esiashvili N, Mahajan A, Yock T, Flampouri S, MacDonald S, Fouladi M, Stephen K, Kalapurakal J, Terezakis S, Kooy H, Grosshans D, Makrigiorgos M, Mishra K, Poussaint TY, Cohen K, Fitzgerald T, Gondi V, Liu A, Michalski J, Mirkovic D, Mohan R, Perkins S, Wong K, Vikram B, Buchsbaum J, Kun L. National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children: Considerations Regarding Brainstem Injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 101:152-168. [PMID: 29619963 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Revised: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 01/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton therapy can allow for superior avoidance of normal tissues. A widespread consensus has been reached that proton therapy should be used for patients with curable pediatric brain tumor to avoid critical central nervous system structures. Brainstem necrosis is a potentially devastating, but rare, complication of radiation. Recent reports of brainstem necrosis after proton therapy have raised concerns over the potential biological differences among radiation modalities. We have summarized findings from the National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children convened in May 2016 to examine brainstem injury. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty-seven physicians, physicists, and researchers from 17 institutions with expertise met to discuss this issue. The definition of brainstem injury, imaging of this entity, clinical experience with photons and photons, and potential biological differences among these radiation modalities were thoroughly discussed and reviewed. The 3 largest US pediatric proton therapy centers collectively summarized the incidence of symptomatic brainstem injury and physics details (planning, dosimetry, delivery) for 671 children with focal posterior fossa tumors treated with protons from 2006 to 2016. RESULTS The average rate of symptomatic brainstem toxicity from the 3 largest US pediatric proton centers was 2.38%. The actuarial rate of grade ≥2 brainstem toxicity was successfully reduced from 12.7% to 0% at 1 center after adopting modified radiation guidelines. Guidelines for treatment planning and current consensus brainstem constraints for proton therapy are presented. The current knowledge regarding linear energy transfer (LET) and its relationship to relative biological effectiveness (RBE) are defined. We review the current state of LET-based planning. CONCLUSIONS Brainstem injury is a rare complication of radiation therapy for both photons and protons. Substantial dosimetric data have been collected for brainstem injury after proton therapy, and established guidelines to allow for safe delivery of proton radiation have been defined. Increased capability exists to incorporate LET optimization; however, further research is needed to fully explore the capabilities of LET- and RBE-based planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Natia Esiashvili
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Torunn Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Shannon MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maryam Fouladi
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Kry Stephen
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - John Kalapurakal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Stephanie Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hanne Kooy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mike Makrigiorgos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kavita Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Tina Young Poussaint
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kenneth Cohen
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Thomas Fitzgerald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Arthur Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jeff Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Dragan Mirkovic
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stephanie Perkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kenneth Wong
- Children's Hospital of Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angles, California
| | - Bhadrasain Vikram
- Radiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Jeff Buchsbaum
- Radiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Larry Kun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hellweg CE, Chishti AA, Diegeler S, Spitta LF, Henschenmacher B, Baumstark-Khan C. Molecular Signaling in Response to Charged Particle Exposures and its Importance in Particle Therapy. Int J Part Ther 2018; 5:60-73. [PMID: 31773020 PMCID: PMC6871585 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-18-00016.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Energetic, charged particles elicit an orchestrated DNA damage response (DDR) during their traversal through healthy tissues and tumors. Complex DNA damage formation, after exposure to high linear energy transfer (LET) charged particles, results in DNA repair foci formation, which begins within seconds. More protein modifications occur after high-LET, compared with low-LET, irradiation. Charged-particle exposure activates several transcription factors that are cytoprotective or cytodestructive, or that upregulate cytokine and chemokine expression, and are involved in bystander signaling. Molecular signaling for a survival or death decision in different tumor types and healthy tissues should be studied as prerequisite for shaping sensitizing and protective strategies. Long-term signaling and gene expression changes were found in various tissues of animals exposed to charged particles, and elucidation of their role in chronic and late effects of charged-particle therapy will help to develop effective preventive measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E. Hellweg
- German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, Köln, Germany
| | - Arif Ali Chishti
- German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, Köln, Germany
- The Karachi Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Sebastian Diegeler
- German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, Köln, Germany
| | - Luis F. Spitta
- German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, Köln, Germany
| | - Bernd Henschenmacher
- German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, Köln, Germany
| | - Christa Baumstark-Khan
- German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, Köln, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ludwig N, Kusumoto T, Galindo C, Peaupardin P, Pin S, Renault JP, Muller D, Yamauchi T, Kodaira S, Barillon R, Raffy Q. Radiolysis of phenylalanine in solution with Bragg-Peak energy protons. RADIAT MEAS 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2018.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
19
|
Biophysical and radiobiological aspects of heavy charged particles. JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY FOR SCIENCE 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtusci.2015.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
20
|
Gillmann C, Lomax AJ, Weber DC, Jäkel O, Karger CP. Dose-response curves for MRI-detected radiation-induced temporal lobe reactions in patients after proton and carbon ion therapy: Does the same RBE-weighted dose lead to the same biological effect? Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:109-114. [PMID: 29459152 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Revised: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To derive the dose-response curve for temporal lobe reactions (TLRs) after proton therapy and to compare the resulting relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted tolerance doses based on an RBE of 1.1 with published values for carbon ions, which were calculated by the two versions of the local effect model (LEM I or IV). METHODS AND MATERIALS 62 patients treated with protons for skull base tumors were analyzed for TLRs using magnetic resonance imaging. Within the mean follow-up time of 38 months, TLRs were observed in six patients. Dose-response curves based on the RBE-weighted maximum dose, excluding the 1 cm3-volume with the highest dose, were derived and compared to previously published dose-response curves for carbon ions, which were obtained using LEM I or IV, respectively. RESULTS The dose-response curves for protons and LEM I were found to be almost identical while the curve of LEM IV was shifted toward higher doses. The resulting tolerance doses at the 5% effect level were 68.2+2.7-5.6, 68.6+3.0-3.9 and 78.3+3.8-5.0 Gy (RBE), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The RBE-weighted dose prescription for protons leads to the same RBE-weighted dose-response curve for TLR as the one for LEM I-based carbon ions, while LEM IV predicts clinically significant higher tolerance doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, PSI Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, PSI Villigen, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dreher C, Habermehl D, Jäkel O, Combs SE. Effective radiotherapeutic treatment intensification in patients with pancreatic cancer: higher doses alone, higher RBE or both? Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:203. [PMID: 29282139 PMCID: PMC5745986 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0945-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer, especially in case of locally advanced stage has a poor prognosis. Radiotherapy in general can lead to tumor volume reduction, but further improvements, such as ion beam therapy have to be promoted in order to enable dose escalation, which in turn results in better local control rates and downsizing of the tumor itself. Ion beam therapy with its highly promising physical properties is also accompanied by distinct inter- and intrafractional challenges in case of robustness. First clinical results are promising, but further research in motion mitigation and biological treatment planning is necessary, in order to determine the best clinical rationales and conditions of ion beam therapy of pancreatic cancer. This review summarizes the current knowledge and studies on ion beam therapy of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Dreher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22 Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Habermehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22 Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Oberschleißheim, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site München, München, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, INF, 280 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), INF 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22 Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Oberschleißheim, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site München, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Carbon Ion Radiotherapy: A Review of Clinical Experiences and Preclinical Research, with an Emphasis on DNA Damage/Repair. Cancers (Basel) 2017; 9:cancers9060066. [PMID: 28598362 PMCID: PMC5483885 DOI: 10.3390/cancers9060066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2017] [Revised: 05/21/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Compared to conventional photon-based external beam radiation (PhXRT), carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has superior dose distribution, higher linear energy transfer (LET), and a higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE). This enhanced RBE is driven by a unique DNA damage signature characterized by clustered lesions that overwhelm the DNA repair capacity of malignant cells. These physical and radiobiological characteristics imbue heavy ions with potent tumoricidal capacity, while having the potential for simultaneously maximally sparing normal tissues. Thus, CIRT could potentially be used to treat some of the most difficult to treat tumors, including those that are hypoxic, radio-resistant, or deep-seated. Clinical data, mostly from Japan and Germany, are promising, with favorable oncologic outcomes and acceptable toxicity. In this manuscript, we review the physical and biological rationales for CIRT, with an emphasis on DNA damage and repair, as well as providing a comprehensive overview of the translational and clinical data using CIRT.
Collapse
|
23
|
Relative biological effectiveness in a proton spread-out Bragg peak formed by pencil beam scanning mode. AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE 2017; 40:359-368. [PMID: 28321635 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-017-0540-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2016] [Accepted: 03/09/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, there is an increased interest in using scanning modes in proton therapy, due to the more conformal dose distributions, thanks to the spot-weighted dose delivery. The dose rate in each spot is however much higher than the dose rate when using passive irradiation modes, which could affect the cell response. The purpose of this work was to investigate how the relative biological effectiveness changes along the spread-out Bragg peak created by protons delivered by the pencil beam scanning mode. Cell survival and micronuclei formation were investigated in four positions along the spread-out Bragg peak for various doses. Monte Carlo simulations were used to estimate the dose-averaged linear energy transfer values in the irradiation positions. The cell survival was found to decrease the deeper the sample was placed in the spread-out Bragg peak, which corresponds to the higher linear energy transfer values found using Monte Carlo simulations. The micronuclei frequencies indicate more complex cell injuries at that distal position compared to the proximal part of the spread-out Bragg peak. The relative biological effectiveness determined in this study varies significantly and systematically from 1.1, which is recommended value by the International Commission on Radiation Units, in all the studied positions. In the distal position of spread-out Bragg peak the relative biological effectiveness values were found to be 2.05 ± 0.44, 1.85 ± 0.42, 1.53 ± 0.38 for survival levels 90, 50 and 10%, respectively.
Collapse
|
24
|
Beltran C, Tseung HWC, Augustine KE, Bues M, Mundy DW, Walsh TJ, Herman MG, Laack NN. Clinical Implementation of a Proton Dose Verification System Utilizing a GPU Accelerated Monte Carlo Engine. Int J Part Ther 2016; 3:312-319. [PMID: 31772983 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-16-00011.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2016] [Accepted: 11/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To develop a clinical infrastructure that allows for routine Monte Carlo dose calculation verification of spot scanning proton treatment plans and includes a simple biological model to aid in normal tissue protection. Materials and Methods A graphical processing unit accelerated Monte Carlo dose engine was used as the calculation engine for dose verification on spot scanning proton plans. An infrastructure was built around this engine that allows for seamless exporting of treatment plans from the treatment planning system and importing of dose distribution from the Monte Carlo calculation via DICOM (digital imaging and communications in medicine). An easy-to-use Web-based interface was developed so that the application could be run from any computer. In addition to the standard relative biological effectiveness = 1.1 for proton therapy, a simple linear equation dependent on dose-weighted linear energy transfer was included. This was used to help detect possible high biological dose in critical structures. Results More than 270 patients were treated at our proton center in the first year of operation. Because most plans underwent multiple iterations before final approval, more than 1000 plans have been run through the system from multiple users with minimal downtime. The average time from plan export to importing of the Monte Carlo doses was less than 15 minutes. Treatment plans have been modified based on the nominal Monte Carlo dose or the biological dose. Conclusion Monte Carlo dose calculation verification of spot scanning proton treatment plans is feasible in a clinical environment. The 3-dimensional dose verification, particularly near heterogeneities, has resulted in plan modifications. The biological dose data provides actionable feedback for end of range effects, especially in pediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Martin Bues
- Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zheng Y, Kang Y, Zeidan O, Schreuder N. An end-to-end assessment of range uncertainty in proton therapy using animal tissues. Phys Med Biol 2016; 61:8010-8024. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/22/8010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
26
|
Marsolat F, De Marzi L, Pouzoulet F, Mazal A. Analytical linear energy transfer model including secondary particles: calculations along the central axis of the proton pencil beam. Phys Med Biol 2016; 61:740-57. [PMID: 26732530 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
In proton therapy, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) depends on various types of parameters such as linear energy transfer (LET). An analytical model for LET calculation exists (Wilkens' model), but secondary particles are not included in this model. In the present study, we propose a correction factor, L sec, for Wilkens' model in order to take into account the LET contributions of certain secondary particles. This study includes secondary protons and deuterons, since the effects of these two types of particles can be described by the same RBE-LET relationship. L sec was evaluated by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations using the GATE/GEANT4 platform and was defined by the ratio of the LET d distributions of all protons and deuterons and only primary protons. This method was applied to the innovative Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) delivery systems and L sec was evaluated along the beam axis. This correction factor indicates the high contribution of secondary particles in the entrance region, with L sec values higher than 1.6 for a 220 MeV clinical pencil beam. MC simulations showed the impact of pencil beam parameters, such as mean initial energy, spot size, and depth in water, on L sec. The variation of L sec with these different parameters was integrated in a polynomial function of the L sec factor in order to obtain a model universally applicable to all PBS delivery systems. The validity of this correction factor applied to Wilkens' model was verified along the beam axis of various pencil beams in comparison with MC simulations. A good agreement was obtained between the corrected analytical model and the MC calculations, with mean-LET deviations along the beam axis less than 0.05 keV μm(-1). These results demonstrate the efficacy of our new correction of the existing LET model in order to take into account secondary protons and deuterons along the pencil beam axis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Marsolat
- Institut Curie, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, France. Institut Curie, Centre de Recherche, Plateforme de Radiothérapie Expérimentale, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hansen TM, Bartlett GK, Mannina EM, Srivastava SP, Cox JA, Das IJ. Dosimetric Comparison of Treatment Techniques: Brachytherapy, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, and Proton Beam in Partial Breast Irradiation. Int J Part Ther 2015. [DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-15-00006.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
28
|
Jones B. Towards Achieving the Full Clinical Potential of Proton Therapy by Inclusion of LET and RBE Models. Cancers (Basel) 2015; 7:460-80. [PMID: 25790470 PMCID: PMC4381269 DOI: 10.3390/cancers7010460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2014] [Revised: 01/19/2015] [Accepted: 03/06/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite increasing use of proton therapy (PBT), several systematic literature reviews show limited gains in clinical outcomes, with publications mostly devoted to recent technical developments. The lack of randomised control studies has also hampered progress in the acceptance of PBT by many oncologists and policy makers. There remain two important uncertainties associated with PBT, namely: (1) accuracy and reproducibility of Bragg peak position (BPP); and (2) imprecise knowledge of the relative biological effect (RBE) for different tissues and tumours, and at different doses. Incorrect BPP will change dose, linear energy transfer (LET) and RBE, with risks of reduced tumour control and enhanced toxicity. These interrelationships are discussed qualitatively with respect to the ICRU target volume definitions. The internationally accepted proton RBE of 1.1 was based on assays and dose ranges unlikely to reveal the complete range of RBE in the human body. RBE values are not known for human (or animal) brain, spine, kidney, liver, intestine, etc. A simple efficiency model for estimating proton RBE values is described, based on data of Belli et al. and other authors, which allows linear increases in α and β with LET, with a gradient estimated using a saturation model from the low LET α and β radiosensitivity parameter input values, and decreasing RBE with increasing dose. To improve outcomes, 3-D dose-LET-RBE and bio-effectiveness maps are required. Validation experiments are indicated in relevant tissues. Randomised clinical studies that test the invariant 1.1 RBE allocation against higher values in late reacting tissues, and lower tumour RBE values in the case of radiosensitive tumours, are also indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bleddyn Jones
- Gray Laboratory, CRUK/MRC Oxford Oncology Institute, The University of Oxford, ORCRB-Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
In addition to the physical advantages (Bragg peak), the use of charged particles in cancer therapy can be associated with distinct biological effects compared to X-rays. While heavy ions (densely ionizing radiation) are known to have an energy- and charge-dependent increased Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE), protons should not be very different from sparsely ionizing photons. A slightly increased biological effectiveness is taken into account in proton treatment planning by assuming a fixed RBE of 1.1 for the whole radiation field. However, data emerging from recent studies suggest that, for several end points of clinical relevance, the biological response is differentially modulated by protons compared to photons. In parallel, research in the field of medical physics highlighted how variations in RBE that are currently neglected might actually result in deposition of significant doses in healthy organs. This seems to be relevant in particular for normal tissues in the entrance region and for organs at risk close behind the tumor. All these aspects will be considered and discussed in this review, highlighting how a re-discussion of the role of a variable RBE in proton therapy might be well-timed.
Collapse
|
30
|
Yonekura Y, Tsujii H, Hopewell JW, López PO, Cosset JM, Paganetti H, Montelius A, Schardt D, Jones B, Nakamura T. ICRP Publication 127: Radiological Protection in Ion Beam Radiotherapy. Ann ICRP 2014; 43:5-113. [PMID: 25915952 DOI: 10.1177/0146645314559144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
The goal of external-beam radiotherapy is to provide precise dose localisation in the treatment volume of the target with minimal damage to the surrounding normal tissue. Ion beams, such as protons and carbon ions, provide excellent dose distributions due primarily to their finite range, allowing a significant reduction of undesired exposure of normal tissue. Careful treatment planning is required for the given type and localisation of the tumour to be treated in order to maximise treatment efficiency and minimise the dose to normal tissue. Radiation exposure in out-of-field volumes arises from secondary neutrons and photons, particle fragments, and photons from activated materials. These unavoidable doses should be considered from the standpoint of radiological protection of the patient. Radiological protection of medical staff at ion beam radiotherapy facilities requires special attention. Appropriate management and control are required for the therapeutic equipment and the air in the treatment room that can be activated by the particle beam and its secondaries. Radiological protection and safety management should always conform with regulatory requirements. The current regulations for occupational exposures in photon radiotherapy are applicable to ion beam radiotherapy with protons or carbon ions. However, ion beam radiotherapy requires a more complex treatment system than conventional radiotherapy, and appropriate training of staff and suitable quality assurance programmes are recommended to avoid possible accidental exposure of patients, to minimise unnecessary doses to normal tissue, and to minimise radiation exposure of staff.
Collapse
|
31
|
Buchsbaum JC, McDonald MW, Johnstone PAS, Hoene T, Mendonca M, Cheng CW, Das IJ, McMullen KP, Wolanski MR. Range modulation in proton therapy planning: a simple method for mitigating effects of increased relative biological effectiveness at the end-of-range of clinical proton beams. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:2. [PMID: 24383792 PMCID: PMC3904459 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-9-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2013] [Accepted: 12/23/2013] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The increase in relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of proton beams at the distal edge of the spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) is a well-known phenomenon that is difficult to quantify accurately in vivo. For purposes of treatment planning, disallowing the distal SOBP to fall within vulnerable tissues hampers sparing to the extent possible with proton beam therapy (PBT). We propose the distal RBE uncertainty may be straightforwardly mitigated with a technique we call “range modulation”. With range modulation, the distal falloff is smeared, reducing both the dose and average RBE over the terminal few millimeters of the SOBP. Methods One patient plan was selected to serve as an example for direct comparison of image-guided radiotherapy plans using non-range modulation PBT (NRMPBT), and range-modulation PBT (RMPBT). An additional plan using RMPBT was created to represent a re-treatment scenario (RMPBTrt) using a vertex beam. Planning statistics regarding dose, volume of the planning targets, and color images of the plans are shown. Results The three plans generated for this patient reveal that in all cases dosimetric and device manufacturing advantages are able to be achieved using RMPBT. Organ at risk (OAR) doses to critical structures such as the cochleae, optic apparatus, hypothalamus, and temporal lobes can be selectively spared using this method. Concerns about the location of the RBE that did significantly impact beam selection and treatment planning no longer have the same impact on the process, allowing these structures to be spared dose and subsequent associated issues. Conclusions This present study has illustrated that RMPBT can improve OAR sparing while giving equivalent coverage to target volumes relative to traditional PBT methods while avoiding the increased RBE at the end of the beam. It has proven easy to design and implement and robust in our planning process. The method underscores the need to optimize treatment plans in PBT for both traditional energy dose in gray (Gy) and biologic dose (RBE).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey C Buchsbaum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Grün R, Friedrich T, Krämer M, Zink K, Durante M, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Scholz M. Physical and biological factors determining the effective proton range. Med Phys 2013; 40:111716. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4824321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
|
33
|
Abstract
Protons are an interesting modality for radiotherapy because of their well defined range and favourable depth dose characteristics. On the other hand, these same characteristics lead to added uncertainties in their delivery. This is particularly the case at the distal end of proton dose distributions, where the dose gradient can be extremely steep. In practice however, this gradient is rarely used to spare critical normal tissues due to such worries about its exact position in the patient. Reasons for this uncertainty are inaccuracies and non-uniqueness of the calibration from CT Hounsfield units to proton stopping powers, imaging artefacts (e.g. due to metal implants) and anatomical changes of the patient during treatment. In order to improve the precision of proton therapy therefore, it would be extremely desirable to verify proton range in vivo, either prior to, during, or after therapy. In this review, we describe and compare state-of-the art in vivo proton range verification methods currently being proposed, developed or clinically implemented.
Collapse
|
34
|
Romero-Weaver AL, Wan XS, Diffenderfer ES, Lin L, Kennedy AR. Effect of SPE-like proton or photon radiation on the kinetics of mouse peripheral blood cells and radiation biological effectiveness determinations. ASTROBIOLOGY 2013; 13:570-7. [PMID: 23980767 PMCID: PMC3689168 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2012.0916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Exploration missions outside low-Earth orbit are being planned; therefore, it is critical to understand the risk astronauts would be exposed to in the space environment, especially during extravehicular activities (EVAs). Reductions in white blood cell (WBC) numbers can occur as a result of exposure to solar particle event (SPE) radiation. The aim of the present study was to determine the duration of the effects on blood cell numbers from exposure to a single whole-body dose of SPE-like proton radiation or photon radiation as well as to determine the radiation biological effectiveness (RBE) values at those times when radiation exposure causes blood cell numbers to experience the most critical effects when using mice as a model. Our results indicate that both types of radiation cause significant reductions in the numbers of all blood cell types at different times post-irradiation. The RBE values were not significantly different from 1.0. These results indicate that the risk estimations for astronauts from exposure of mice to SPE-like proton radiation are comparable to those previously made for doses of standard reference radiations, suggesting that countermeasures should be developed for the decreases in blood cell counts observed following the exposure of mice to SPE radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Romero-Weaver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sorokina S, Markova E, Gursky J, Dobrovodsky J, Belyaev I. Relative biological efficiency of protons at low and therapeutic doses in induction of 53BP1/γH2AX foci in lymphocytes from umbilical cord blood. Int J Radiat Biol 2013; 89:716-23. [DOI: 10.3109/09553002.2013.797619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
36
|
Fan C, Li Y, Liu Q. Advantages of proton therapy in non-small cell lung cancers. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2013; 28:183-6. [PMID: 23461384 DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2012.1343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The advantage of proton therapy over conventional radiotherapy is enormous, with many clinical advantages. In this review, we summarized the important literature in the advantages of Proton Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancers.
Collapse
|
37
|
Girdhani S, Sachs R, Hlatky L. Biological Effects of Proton Radiation: What We Know and Don't Know. Radiat Res 2013; 179:257-72. [DOI: 10.1667/rr2839.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
38
|
Tian J, Tian S, Gridley DS. Comparison of acute proton, photon, and low-dose priming effects on genes associated with extracellular matrix and adhesion molecules in the lungs. FIBROGENESIS & TISSUE REPAIR 2013; 6:4. [PMID: 23374750 PMCID: PMC3579759 DOI: 10.1186/1755-1536-6-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2012] [Accepted: 01/09/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background Crew members on space missions inevitably are exposed to low background radiation and can receive much higher doses during solar particle events (SPE) that consist primarily of protons. Ionizing radiation could cause lung pathologies. Cell adhesion molecules (CAM) are believed to participate in fibrogenesis. Interactions between CAM and extracellular matrix (ECM) affect epithelial repair mechanisms in the lung. However, there are very limited data on biological effects of protons on normal lung tissue. Numerous reports have shown that exposure to low-dose/low-dose-rate (LDR) radiation can result in radioadaptation that renders cells more resistant to subsequent acute radiation. The goal of this study was to compare expression of genes associated with ECM and CAM, as well as critical profibrotic mediators, in mouse lungs after acute irradiation with photons and protons, and also determine whether pre-exposure to LDR γ-rays induces an adaptive effect. Results Overall, a marked difference was present in the proton vs. photon groups in gene expression. When compared to 0 Gy, more genes were affected by protons than by photons at both time points (11 vs. 6 on day 21 and 14 vs. 8 on day 56), and all genes affected by protons were upregulated. Many genes were modulated by LDR γ-rays when combined with photons or protons. Col1a1, mmp14, and mmp15 were significantly upregulated by all radiation regimens on day 21. Similarly, the change in expression of profibrotic proteins was also detected after acute and combination irradiation. Conclusion These data show that marked differences were present between acutely delivered protons and photons in modulating genes, and the effect of protons was more profound than that of photons. Pre-exposure to LDR γ-rays ‘normalized’ some genes that were modified by acute irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Tian
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Radiation Research Laboratories and Department of Basic Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.,Department of Pathological Anatomy, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Sisi Tian
- Department of Otolaryngology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, 92354, USA
| | - Daila S Gridley
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Radiation Research Laboratories and Department of Basic Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Horcicka M, Meyer C, Buschbacher A, Durante M, Krämer M. Algorithms for the optimization of RBE-weighted dose in particle therapy. Phys Med Biol 2012; 58:275-86. [PMID: 23257239 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/2/275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
We report on various algorithms used for the nonlinear optimization of RBE-weighted dose in particle therapy. Concerning the dose calculation carbon ions are considered and biological effects are calculated by the Local Effect Model. Taking biological effects fully into account requires iterative methods to solve the optimization problem. We implemented several additional algorithms into GSI's treatment planning system TRiP98, like the BFGS-algorithm and the method of conjugated gradients, in order to investigate their computational performance. We modified textbook iteration procedures to improve the convergence speed. The performance of the algorithms is presented by convergence in terms of iterations and computation time. We found that the Fletcher-Reeves variant of the method of conjugated gradients is the algorithm with the best computational performance. With this algorithm we could speed up computation times by a factor of 4 compared to the method of steepest descent, which was used before. With our new methods it is possible to optimize complex treatment plans in a few minutes leading to good dose distributions. At the end we discuss future goals concerning dose optimization issues in particle therapy which might benefit from fast optimization solvers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Horcicka
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Planckstr. 1, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Britten RA, Nazaryan V, Davis LK, Klein SB, Nichiporov D, Mendonca MS, Wolanski M, Nie X, George J, Keppel C. Variations in the RBE for cell killing along the depth-dose profile of a modulated proton therapy beam. Radiat Res 2012; 179:21-8. [PMID: 23148508 DOI: 10.1667/rr2737.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Considerable evidence now exists to show that that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) changes considerably along the proton depth-dose distribution, with progressively higher RBE values at the distal part of the modulated, or spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) and in the distal dose fall-off (DDF). However, the highly variable nature of the existing studies (with regards to cell lines, and to the physical properties and dosimetry of the various proton beams) precludes any consensus regarding the RBE weighting factor at any position in the depth-dose profile. We have thus conducted a systematic study on the variation in RBE for cell killing for two clinical modulated proton beams at Indiana University and have determined the relationship between the RBE and the dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) of the protons at various positions along the depth-dose profiles. Clonogenic assays were performed on human Hep2 laryngeal cancer cells and V79 cells at various positions along the SOBPs of beams with incident energies of 87 and 200 MeV. There was a marked variation in the radiosensitivity of both cell lines along the SOBP depth-dose profile of the 87 MeV proton beam. Using Hep2 cells, the D(0.1) isoeffect dose RBE values (normalized against (60)Co) were 1.46 at the middle of SOBP, 2.1 at the distal end of the SOBP and 2.3 in the DDF. For V79 cells, the D(0.1) isoeffect RBE for the 87 MEV beam were 1.23 for the proximal end of the SOBP: 1.46 for the distal SOBP and 1.78 for the DDF. Similar D(0.1) isoeffect RBE values were found for Hep2 cells irradiated at various positions along the depth-dose profile of the 200 MeV beam. Our experimentally derived RBE values were significantly correlated (P = 0.001) with the mean LETd of the protons at the various depths, which confirmed that proton RBE is highly dependent on LETd. These in vitro data suggest that the RBE of the proton beam at certain depths is greater than 1.1, a value currently used in most treatment planning algorithms. Thus, the potential for increased cell killing and normal tissue damage in the distal regions of the proton SOBP may be greater than originally thought.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A Britten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sharp H, Grosshans D, Kadia T, Dabaja BS. Cutaneous graft-versus-host disease after proton-based craniospinal irradiation for recurrent Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. BMJ Case Rep 2012; 2012:bcr.02.2012.5742. [PMID: 22787181 DOI: 10.1136/bcr.02.2012.5742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment of recurrent acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) often involves allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT) and disease recurrence in the central nervous system may require craniospinal irradiation. Although graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a known risk after alloSCT, cutaneous manifestation within radiation fields is rarely seen. The authors report a case of a 25-year-old man with Philadelphia+ALL recurring in the central nervous system after a homologous SCT. Craniospinal radiation was delivered with proton therapy to a total dose of 24 cobalt-Gray-equivalents in 12 fractions. Eight weeks after the proton therapy, significant cutaneous GVHD had developed within the radiation fields. This was treated successfully with tacrolimus (4 mg/day), a short course of methylprednisolone, and topical treatment with 0.1% triamcinolone cream, 0.05% clobetasol ointment. Cutaneous GVHD after SCT can be seen within proton radiation fields probably due to an inherent higher skin dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadley Sharp
- Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Jones B, Wilson P, Nagano A, Fenwick J, McKenna G. Dilemmas concerning dose distribution and the influence of relative biological effect in proton beam therapy of medulloblastoma. Br J Radiol 2012; 85:e912-8. [PMID: 22553304 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/24498486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To improve medulloblastoma proton therapy. Although considered ideal for proton therapy, there are potential disadvantages. Expected benefits include reduced radiation-induced cancer and circulatory complications, while avoiding small brain volumes of dose in-homogeneity when compared with conventional X-rays. Several aspects of proton therapy might contribute to reduced tumour control due to (a) the use of more homogenous dose levels which can result in under-dosage, (b) differences in relative biological effectiveness (RBE) between that prescription RBE of 1.1 and the RBE of brain and spinal cord (likely to exceed 1.1) and in medulloblastoma cells (where RBE is likely to be below 1.1). Such changes, although speculative for RBE, might result in potential underdosage of tumour cells and a higher bio-effect in brain tissue. METHODS Dose distributions for X-ray and proton treatment are compared, with allocation of likely RBE values for fast growing medullolastoma cells and stable central nervous system tissue. RESULTS These physical and radiobiological factors are shown to combine to give a higher risk of tumour recurrence with further risks on tumour control when dose reduction schedules used for X-ray therapy are replicated for proton therapy for "low-risk" patients. CONCLUSION The dose distributions and prescribed doses of proton therapy, taking into account RBE, in children and adults with medulloblastoma, need to be reconsidered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Jones
- Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Jones B, Underwood TSA, Carabe-Fernandez A, Timlin C, Dale RG. Fast neutron relative biological effects and implications for charged particle therapy. Br J Radiol 2012; 84 Spec No 1:S11-8. [PMID: 22374547 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/67509851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
In two fast neutron data sets, comprising in vitro and in vivo experiments, an inverse relationship is found between the low-linear energy transfer (LET) α/β ratio and the maximum value of relative biological effect (RBE(max)), while the minimum relative biological effect (RBE(min)) is linearly related to the square root of the low-LET α/β ratio. RBE(max) is the RBE at near zero dose and can be represented by the ratio of the α parameters at high- and low-LET radiation exposures. RBE(min) is the RBE at very high dose and can be represented by the ratio of the square roots of the β parameters at high- and low-LET radiation exposures. In principle, it may be possible to use the low-LET α/β ratio to predict RBE(max) and RBE(min, )providing that other LET-related parameters, which reflect intercept and slopes of these relationships, are used. These two limits of RBE determine the intermediate values of RBE at any dose per fraction; therefore, it is possible to find the RBE at any dose per fraction. Although these results are obtained from fast neutron experiments, there are implications for charged particle therapy using protons (when RBE is scaled downwards) and for heavier ion beams (where the magnitude of RBE is similar to that for fast neutrons). In the case of fast neutrons, late reacting normal tissue systems and very slow growing tumours, which have the smallest values of the low-LET α/β ratio, are predicted to have the highest RBE values at low fractional doses, but the lowest values of RBE at higher doses when they are compared with early reacting tissues and fast growing tumour systems that have the largest low-LET α/β ratios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Jones
- Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Proton beam therapy (PBT) makes it possible to deliver a high concentration of radiation to a tumor using its Bragg peak, and it is simple to utilize as its radiobiological characteristics are identical to those of photon beams. PBT has now been used for half a century, and more than 60,000 patients worldwide are reported to have been treated with proton beams. The most significant change to PBT occurred in the 1990s, when the Loma Linda University Medical Center became the first hospital in the world to operate a medically dedicated proton therapy facility. Following its success, similar medically dedicated facilities have been constructed. Internationally, results have demonstrated the therapeutic superiority of PBT over alternative treatment options for several disease sites. Further advances in PBT are expected from both clinical and technological perspectives.
Collapse
|
45
|
Zlobinskaya O, Dollinger G, Michalski D, Hable V, Greubel C, Du G, Multhoff G, Röper B, Molls M, Schmid TE. Induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks assessed by gamma-H2AX foci after irradiation with pulsed or continuous proton beams. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2012; 51:23-32. [PMID: 22228542 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-011-0398-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2011] [Accepted: 12/10/2011] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
In particle tumor therapy including beam scanning at accelerators, the dose per voxel is delivered within about 100 ms. In contrast, the new technology of laser plasma acceleration will produce ultimately shorter particle packages that deliver the dose within a nanosecond. Here, possible differences for relative biological effectiveness in creating DNA double-strand breaks in pulsed or continuous irradiation mode are studied. HeLa cells were irradiated with 1 or 5 Gy of 20-MeV protons at the Munich tandem accelerator, either at continuous mode (100 ms), or applying a single pulse of 1-ns duration. Cells were fixed 1 h after 1-Gy irradiation and 24 h after 5-Gy irradiation, respectively. A dose-effect curve based on five doses of X-rays was taken as reference. The total number of phosphorylated histone H2AX (gamma-H2AX) foci per cell was determined using a custom-made software macro for gamma-H2AX foci counting. For 1 h after 1-Gy 20-MeV proton exposures, values for the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 0.97 ± 0.19 for pulsed and 1.13 ± 0.21 for continuous irradiations were obtained in the first experiment 1.13 ± 0.09 and 1.16 ± 0.09 in the second experiment. After 5 Gy and 24 h, RBE values of 0.99 ± 0.29 and 0.91 ± 0.23 were calculated, respectively. Based on the gamma-H2AX foci numbers obtained, no significant differences in RBE between pulsed and continuous proton irradiation in HeLa cells were detected. These results are well in line with our data on micronucleus induction in HeLa cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Zlobinskaya
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität Muenchen, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Auer S, Hable V, Greubel C, Drexler GA, Schmid TE, Belka C, Dollinger G, Friedl AA. Survival of tumor cells after proton irradiation with ultra-high dose rates. Radiat Oncol 2011; 6:139. [PMID: 22008289 PMCID: PMC3215966 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-6-139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2011] [Accepted: 10/18/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laser acceleration of protons and heavy ions may in the future be used in radiation therapy. Laser-driven particle beams are pulsed and ultra high dose rates of >10⁹ Gy s⁻¹ may be achieved. Here we compare the radiobiological effects of pulsed and continuous proton beams. METHODS The ion microbeam SNAKE at the Munich tandem accelerator was used to directly compare a pulsed and a continuous 20 MeV proton beam, which delivered a dose of 3 Gy to a HeLa cell monolayer within < 1 ns or 100 ms, respectively. Investigated endpoints were G2 phase cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and colony formation. RESULTS At 10 h after pulsed irradiation, the fraction of G2 cells was significantly lower than after irradiation with the continuous beam, while all other endpoints including colony formation were not significantly different. We determined the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for pulsed and continuous proton beams relative to x-irradiation as 0.91 ± 0.26 and 0.86 ± 0.33 (mean and SD), respectively. CONCLUSIONS At the dose rates investigated here, which are expected to correspond to those in radiation therapy using laser-driven particles, the RBE of the pulsed and the (conventional) continuous irradiation mode do not differ significantly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Auer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Park SH, Kang JO. Basics of particle therapy I: physics. Radiat Oncol J 2011; 29:135-46. [PMID: 22984664 PMCID: PMC3429896 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2011.29.3.135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2011] [Revised: 06/13/2011] [Accepted: 07/04/2011] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
With the advance of modern radiation therapy technique, radiation dose conformation and dose distribution have improved dramatically. However, the progress does not completely fulfill the goal of cancer treatment such as improved local control or survival. The discordances with the clinical results are from the biophysical nature of photon, which is the main source of radiation therapy in current field, with the lower linear energy transfer to the target. As part of a natural progression, there recently has been a resurgence of interest in particle therapy, specifically using heavy charged particles, because these kinds of radiations serve theoretical advantages in both biological and physical aspects. The Korean government is to set up a heavy charged particle facility in Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences. This review introduces some of the elementary physics of the various particles for the sake of Korean radiation oncologists' interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seo Hyun Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wang CC, Hsiao Y, Lee CC, Chao TC, Wang CC, Tung CJ. Monte Carlo simulations of therapeutic proton beams for relative biological effectiveness of double-strand break. Int J Radiat Biol 2011; 88:158-63. [PMID: 21823821 DOI: 10.3109/09553002.2011.611214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values relative to (60)Co for the induction of double-strand breaks (DSB) were calculated for therapeutic proton beams. RBE-weighted absorbed doses were determined at different depths in a water phantom for proton beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS The depth-dose distributions and the fluence spectra for primary protons and secondary particles were calculated using the FLUKA (FLUktuierende KAskade) MC (Monte Carlo) transport code. These spectra were combined with the MCDS (Monte Carlo damage simulation) code to simulate the spectrum-averaged yields of clustered DNA lesions. RBE for the induction of DSB were then determined at different depths in a water phantom for the unmodulated and modulated proton beams. RESULTS The maximum RBE for the induction of DSB at 1 Gy absorbed dose was found about 1.5 at 0.5 cm distal to the Bragg peak maximum for an UNMODULATED 160 MeV proton beam. The RBE-weighted absorbed dose extended the biologically effective range of the proton beam by 1.9 mm. The corresponding maximum RBE value was inversely proportional to the proton beam energy, reaching a value of about 1.9 for 70 MeV proton beam. For a modulated 160 MeV proton beam, the RBE weightings were more pronounced near the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) distal edge. CONCLUSIONS It was demonstrated that a fast MCDS code could be used to simulate the DNA damage yield for therapeutic proton beams. Simulated RBE for the induction of DSB were comparable to RBE measured in vitro and in vivo. Depth dependent RBE values in the SOBP region might have to be considered in certain treatment situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Ching Wang
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Kwei-Shan Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Park S, Kwak J, Yoon M, Shin D, Lee S, Cho K, Kang S, Kim K, Bae H, Park S. Dose verification of proton beam therapy using the Gafchromic EBT film. RADIAT MEAS 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
50
|
Allen C, Borak TB, Tsujii H, Nickoloff JA. Heavy charged particle radiobiology: using enhanced biological effectiveness and improved beam focusing to advance cancer therapy. Mutat Res 2011; 711:150-7. [PMID: 21376738 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2010] [Revised: 02/16/2011] [Accepted: 02/16/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Ionizing radiation causes many types of DNA damage, including base damage and single- and double-strand breaks. Photons, including X-rays and γ-rays, are the most widely used type of ionizing radiation in radiobiology experiments, and in radiation cancer therapy. Charged particles, including protons and carbon ions, are seeing increased use as an alternative therapeutic modality. Although the facilities needed to produce high energy charged particle beams are more costly than photon facilities, particle therapy has shown improved cancer survival rates, reflecting more highly focused dose distributions and more severe DNA damage to tumor cells. Despite early successes of charged particle radiotherapy, there is room for further improvement, and much remains to be learned about normal and cancer cell responses to charged particle radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Allen
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|