Surgery Versus Nonsurgical Methods in Treating Neuropathic Plantar Forefoot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Interphalangeal Resection Arthroplasty for the Prevention and Treatment of Diabetic Deformities and Ulcers of the Toes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are serious complications that induce a high risk of lower extremity amputations and mortality. Compared with the standard of care, few reports analyzed the outcome of surgical treatment mainly for diabetic toe deformities and ulcers. The aim of this study is to collate evidence on the outcomes of interphalangeal resection arthroplasty (IP-RA) in preventing and treating diabetic toe ulcers distal to the metatarsophalangeal joint.

Methods

A search strategy has been developed including electronic databases from inception. Only ulcers distal to the metatarsophalangeal joints were included. Noninfected and infected ulcers were also included at any toe location (dorsal/side/plantar). Outcomes were defined as healing rate, time to heal, ulcer recurrence, ulcer transfer, postintervention infection, wound dehiscence, and additional surgeries including amputation. Proportional meta-analysis was conducted for frequency outcomes.

Results

Six observational studies comprising 217 patients with 244 IP-RA procedures were included. The mean follow-up period was 23.4 ± 8.2 months. Weighted frequencies were as follows: healing rate (93.6%), ulcer recurrence frequency (4.3%), ulcer transfer frequency (15.4%), postoperative infection (10.5%), wound dehiscence (17.8%), revision surgery (5%), and amputation rate (3.4%). The mean healing time was 4.3 ± 1.8 weeks.

Conclusion

This review suggests that IP-RA is effective in preventing and treating diabetic toe deformities and ulcers with a modest rate of complications for this specific and often challenging clinical presentation.

Insights into the mechanisms of diabetic wounds: pathophysiology, molecular targets, and treatment strategies through conventional and alternative therapies

Diabetes mellitus is a prevalent cause of mortality worldwide and can lead to several secondary issues, including DWs, which are caused by hyperglycemia, diabetic neuropathy, anemia, and ischemia. Roughly 15% of diabetic patient's experience complications related to DWs, with 25% at risk of lower limb amputations. A conventional management protocol is currently used for treating diabetic foot syndrome, which involves therapy using various substances, such as bFGF, pDGF, VEGF, EGF, IGF-I, TGF-β, skin substitutes, cytokine stimulators, cytokine inhibitors, MMPs inhibitors, gene and stem cell therapies, ECM, and angiogenesis stimulators. The protocol also includes wound cleaning, laser therapy, antibiotics, skin substitutes, HOTC therapy, and removing dead tissue. It has been observed that treatment with numerous plants and their active constituents, including Globularia Arabica, Rhus coriaria L., Neolamarckia cadamba, Olea europaea, Salvia kronenburgii, Moringa oleifera, Syzygium aromaticum, Combretum molle, and Myrtus communis, has been found to promote wound healing, reduce inflammation, stimulate angiogenesis, and cytokines production, increase growth factors production, promote keratinocyte production, and encourage fibroblast proliferation. These therapies may also reduce the need for amputations. However, there is still limited information on how to prevent and manage DWs, and further research is needed to fully understand the role of alternative treatments in managing complications of DWs. The conventional management protocol for treating diabetic foot syndrome can be expensive and may cause adverse side effects. Alternative therapies, such as medicinal plants and green synthesis of nano-formulations, may provide efficient and affordable treatments for DWs.

Should we resect more proximally? Outcomes of toe amputation versus ray resection in patients with infected diabetic ulcers and osteomyelitis. A preliminary study and new treatment algorithm

BACKGROUND

The treatment of severe diabetic toe infection complicated with osteomyelitis is often surgical. The decision on the level of amputation, when required, is difficult. Very few articles reported comparative outcomes between toe amputation and ray resection, and only in relation to the hallux. The aim of this preliminary report is to record the results of these procedures when performed on all toes.

METHODS

This is a comparative retrospective study where the charts of a continuous series of 44 patients (48 procedures) with diabetic forefoot infection were analyzed. Only cases of severe infection with confirmed osteomyelitis were included. Two groups were compared based on the level of amputation: the toe amputation group (at and distal to the metatarsophalangeal joint) and the ray resection group (distal to tarsometatarsal joint). The primary outcomes were defined as osteomyelitis recurrence and re-amputation.

RESULTS

Outcome comparison between toe amputation and ray resection; 47.3 % vs. 51.7 % had a recurrence of their osteomyelitis (p = 0.8), 36.8 % vs. 34.5 % had a re-amputation (p = 0.02). Re-amputation was needed in 25 % of cases following hallux/first ray index procedure while the same was required in 39 % of cases following lateral toes/rays index procedures (p = 0.4). Both primary outcomes were correlated to CDK, smoking and creatinine level.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone infection recurrence and re-amputation are highly prevalent in patients undergoing initial amputation for severe diabetic toe infection. A more aggressive approach in the form of a more proximal level of index amputation might be needed when treating severe toe infections with osteomyelitis in patients with diabetes.

Basic haematological tests as inflammatory performance markers of patients treated either by conservative surgery or minor amputation for infected diabetic foot ulcers

Basic inflammatory markers have been extensively studied to differentiate between non-infected and infected diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Very rarely, basic haematological tests such as white cell count (WCC) and platelet counts were used as performance markers for DFU infection severity. The aim is to investigate these biomarkers in patients with DFU treated exclusively with surgery. In this retrospective comparative study, we included 154 procedures comparing a conservative surgery group (n = 66 for infected DFU) and a minor amputation group (n = 88 for infected DFU with osteomyelitis). Outcomes were set as the preoperative values of: WCC, neutrophils (N), lymphocytes (L), Monocytes (M), Platelets (P), red cell distribution width (RDW) and the ratios N/L, L/M and P/L. Area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was calculated based on the diagnosis of minor amputation as a positive result. Cutoff point values with the highest sensitivity and specificity were obtained for each outcome. The highest AUC values were for WCC (0.68), neutrophils (0.68), platelets (0.7) and P/L ratio (0.69) with corresponding cut-off values of 10,650/mm3 , 76%, 234,000/mcL and 265, respectively. The highest sensitivity was for the platelet count (81.5%) while the highest specificity was for L/M (89%) and P/L ratios (87%). Postoperative values showed similar results. Simple routine blood tests could serve as inflammatory performance markers to help predict the severity of infection in patients treated surgically for infected DFU.

Analysis of systemic risk factors between diabetic/vascular patients having primary lower limb amputations and re-amputations

Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are known to be predisposed to many complications in the lower extremities such as neuropathy, peripheral artery disease (PAD) and infection. Diabetic foot ulcers are complications of diabetes that can lead to lower extremity amputations, re-amputations and high mortality rates.Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk factors associated with higher re-amputation rates in diabetic foot disease.Research Design: This is a mono-centric retrospective comparative study.Study Sample: the study included 136 patients, with a total of 193 procedures (111 primary amputations and 82 re-amputations) between 2011 and 2021.Data Analysis: The t-student test and Spearman correlation were used to look for mean differences and any relevant association, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was computed to look for independent variables.Results: Twenty-two (27%) and 60 (50%) of those who had major and minor amputations, respectively, had a re-amputation (p = 0.006). Besides diabetes (89%), the commonest risk factor associated with amputation was hypertension (86.7%), be it for primary amputation or re-amputation, followed by peripheral (PAD) and coronary artery diseases. Only three risk factors showed independent correlation with re-amputation; chronic kidney disease (r = 15%, p = 0.03), smoking (r = 15%, p = 0.03), and simultaneous presence of DM + PAD (r = 13.7%, p = 0.05).Conclusions: Factors that were significantly correlated with increased re-amputation rates have a clear pathologic pathway that affects vascularity and wound healing. Further studies should be aimed at developing a clear scoring system that can be used to stratify patient for re-amputation risk, and to better predict the results according to the severity of diabetes.

Identifying health research in the era of COVID-19: A scoping review

Background

Health improvements are considered one of the most important fields of research. Since the coronavirus disease 2019 was declared a pandemic, it might have impacted clinical and public health research in various forms.

Objectives

The goal of this study is to explore health research approaches in the era of coronavirus disease 2019.

Methods

In this scoping review, we reviewed published medical full-text studies and identified potential areas of interest of health research in the era the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic during the last 3 years within a higher educational setting. A bibliometric analysis was used to compare among published works.

Results

Among the 93 studies that met the inclusion criteria, most focused on mental health (n = 23; 24.7%). Twenty-one publications targeted coronavirus disease 2019 and its consequences on general health. Other studies have described hemato-oncological, cardiovascular, respiratory, and endocrinological diseases. 42 studies were cross-sectional or cohort studies and most of them published in Q1 journals. Almost half of them belonged to the Faculty of Medicine (49.5%) followed by the School of Arts, Sciences, and Psychology (26.9%).

Conclusions

Health research has been demonstrated to be important, at all times, especially during crises. Therefore, researchers need to invest more efforts into seeking new medical updates in various health-related fields, regardless of their correlation with coronavirus disease 2019.

Evidence-based conservative limb preserving surgery for the diabetic foot complications: A systematic review of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

Limb preserving surgery for the treatment of diabetic foot complications (DFC) has been shown to yield excellent results and better outcomes when compared to non-surgical standard of care. The quality of the articles reporting the results of limb preserving surgery in treating DFC is quite low. The aim of this study was to evaluate the published systematic reviews and meta-analyses that looked at the efficacy of limb preserving surgery in treating DFC.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched for all systematic reviews and meta-analyses on limb preserving surgery in DFC. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews was used to appraise studies' quality.

RESULTS

22 systematic reviews and meta-analyses with a total of 10,559 patients met the inclusion criteria. Five reviews reported on surgical treatment of diabetic Charcot, 5 reviews on bony procedures and 12 reviews on soft tissue procedures for treating DFU. The results of each review were reported. The vast majority of the studies were of Level IV of evidence. The mean JBI score was 9.82.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an underuse of the available limb preserving operations for the treatment of DFC despite excellent results and variety of procedures available in the literature, especially for Charcot neuroarthropathy and diabetic foot and toe ulcers.

Are Digital Arthroplasty and Arthrodesis Useful and Safe Surgical Techniques for the Management of Patients with Diabetic Foot?

OBJECTIVE

To analyze and compare the development of short- and long-term complications in patients with diabetic foot after digital arthroplasty or arthrodesis.

METHODS

The authors reviewed patient records from January 2017 to March 2020. Patients were treated by digital arthroplasty or arthrodesis to correct toe deformity (elective or prophylactic surgery), achieve ulcer healing in toes (curative surgery), or manage toe infection (emergent surgery). During 1-year follow-up, researchers registered short- and long-term complications. Researchers analyzed the association between the type of surgery and the development of short- and long-term complications.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (83.0%) received arthroplasty, and nine (17.0%) received arthrodesis. The mean time to heal from ulcers was 5.2 ± 5.2 weeks. A significant association was observed between arthrodesis and the development of long-term complications (P = .044; odds ratio, 5.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-27.2). No differences were observed between type of surgery and short- or long-term complications. Moreover, both short- and long-term complications were related to longer time to heal (respectively, 7.6 ± 6.0 vs 2.1 ± 0.5 weeks, P < .001; and 6.3 ± 6.2 vs 4.2 ± 4.0 weeks, P = .039).

CONCLUSIONS

Digital arthroplasty or arthrodesis are good options for managing patients with diabetic foot who require digital deformity correction to achieve digital ulcer healing or management of diabetic foot infection in phalanges.

The internal pedal amputation as a salvage procedure in diabetic and ischemic foot infection. A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Osteomyelitis of the diabetic foot is a very challenging condition and amputation is often indicated. In some cases where the infection is localized and the surrounding soft tissue is mildly involved, an internal pedal amputation (IPA) based on resection and limited excision of the infected bone have been suggested as a viable option. This systematic review aims to look for the effectiveness of this technique in treating selected cases of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using multiple electronic databases from inception. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria; one retrospective comparative study, six retrospective observational studies and one prospective observational study.

RESULTS

Based on a pooled sample of 545 patients followed over a mean period of 27.7 ± 15.2 months, the weighted results were as follows: (a) healing rate was 87.7% (95% CI = 0.757-0.959), (b) time for healing was 7.1 ± 2.9 weeks, (c) wound infection rate was 5.6% (95% CI = 0.030-0.089), (d) wound dehiscence rate was 8% (95% CI = 0.010-0.204), (e) ulcer recurrence rate was of 10% (95% CI = 0.037-0.188), and (f) amputation rate was 2.8% (95% CI = 0.001-0.085) whilst all were minor amputations.

CONCLUSION

The findings support the selection of toe/ray sparing surgery via IPA as a viable surgical option for selected cases of focal osteomyelitis secondary to diabetic foot infection. The results would indicate that when the ulcer size could be adequately reduced, removing the infected bone while preserving the soft tissue envelope could yield high chance of success with few serious complications.

Diabetic Wound-Healing Science

Diabetes mellitus is an increasingly prevalent chronic metabolic disease characterized by prolonged hyperglycemia that leads to long-term health consequences. It is estimated that impaired healing of diabetic wounds affects approximately 25% of all patients with diabetes mellitus, often resulting in lower limb amputation, with subsequent high economic and psychosocial costs. The hyperglycemic environment promotes the formation of biofilms and makes diabetic wounds difficult to treat. In this review, we present updates regarding recent advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of diabetic wounds focusing on impaired angiogenesis, neuropathy, sub-optimal chronic inflammatory response, barrier disruption, and subsequent polymicrobial infection, followed by current and future treatment strategies designed to tackle the various pathologies associated with diabetic wounds. Given the alarming increase in the prevalence of diabetes, and subsequently diabetic wounds, it is imperative that future treatment strategies target multiple causes of impaired healing in diabetic wounds.