Antioxidants and cancer therapy: furthering the debate

Antioxidants in brain tumors: current therapeutic significance and future prospects

Brain cancer is regarded among the deadliest forms of cancer worldwide. The distinct tumor microenvironment and inherent characteristics of brain tumor cells virtually render them resistant to the majority of conventional and advanced therapies. Oxidative stress (OS) is a key disruptor of normal brain homeostasis and is involved in carcinogenesis of different forms of brain cancers. Thus, antioxidants may inhibit tumorigenesis by preventing OS induced by various oncogenic factors. Antioxidants are hypothesized to inhibit cancer initiation by endorsing DNA repair and suppressing cancer progression by creating an energy crisis for preneoplastic cells, resulting in antiproliferative effects. These effects are referred to as chemopreventive effects mediated by an antioxidant mechanism. In addition, antioxidants minimize chemotherapy-induced nonspecific organ toxicity and prolong survival. Antioxidants also support the prooxidant chemistry that demonstrate chemotherapeutic potential, particularly at high or pharmacological doses and trigger OS by promoting free radical production, which is essential for activating cell death pathways. A growing body of evidence also revealed the roles of exogenous antioxidants as adjuvants and their ability to reverse chemoresistance. In this review, we explain the influences of different exogenous and endogenous antioxidants on brain cancers with reference to their chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic roles. The role of antioxidants on metabolic reprogramming and their influence on downstream signaling events induced by tumor suppressor gene mutations are critically discussed. Finally, the review hypothesized that both pro- and antioxidant roles are involved in the anticancer mechanisms of the antioxidant molecules by killing neoplastic cells and inhibiting tumor recurrence followed by conventional cancer treatments. The requirements of pro- and antioxidant effects of exogenous antioxidants in brain tumor treatment under different conditions are critically discussed along with the reasons behind the conflicting outcomes in different reports. Finally, we also mention the influencing factors that regulate the pharmacology of the exogenous antioxidants in brain cancer treatment. In conclusion, to achieve consistent clinical outcomes with antioxidant treatments in brain cancers, rigorous mechanistic studies are required with respect to the types, forms, and stages of brain tumors. The concomitant treatment regimens also need adequate consideration.

Auranofin-Based Analogues Are Effective Against Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma In Vivo and Display No Significant Systemic Toxicity

Effective pharmacological treatments for patients with advanced clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) are limited. Bimetallic titanium-gold containing compounds exhibit significant cytotoxicity against ccRCC in vitro and in vivo and inhibit invasion and angiogenisis in vitro and markers driving these phenomena. However, in vivo preclinical evaluations of such compounds have not examined their pharmacokinetics, pathology, and hematology. Here we use NOD.CB17-Prkdc SCID/J mice bearing xenograft ccRCC Caki-1 tumors to evaluate the in vivo efficacies of two titanium-gold compounds Titanocref and Titanofin (based on auranofin analogue scaffolds) accompanied by pharmacokinetic and pathology studies. A therapeutic trial was performed over 21 days at 5 mg/kg/72h of Titanocref and 10 mg/kg/72h of Titanofin tracking changes in tumor size. We observed a significant reduction of 51% and 60%, respectively (p < 0.01) in tumor size in the Titanocref- and Titanofin-treated mice compared to the starting size, while the vehicle-treated mice exhibited a tumor size increase of 138% (p < 0.01). Importantly, no signs of pathological complication as a result of treatment were found. In addition, Titanocref and Titanofin treatment reduced angiogenesis by 38% and 54%, respectively. Microarray and qRT-PCR analysis of ccRCC Caki-1 cells treated with Titanocref revealed that the compound alters apoptosis, JNK MAP kinase, and ROS pathways within 3 h of treatment. We further show activation of apoptosis by Titanocref and Titanofin in vivo by caspase 3 assay. Titanocref is active against additional kidney cancer cells. Titanocref and Titanofin are therefore promising candidates for further evaluation toward clinical application in the treatment of ccRCC.

Auranofin-Based Analogues Are Effective Against Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma In Vivo and Display No Significant Systemic Toxicity

Effective pharmacological treatments for patients with advanced clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) are limited. Bimetallic titanium-gold containing compounds exhibit significant cytotoxicity against ccRCC in vitro and in vivo and inhibit invasion and angiogenisis in vitro and markers driving these phenomena. However, in vivo preclinical evaluations of such compounds have not examined their pharmacokinetics, pathology, and hematology. Here we use NOD.CB17-Prkdc SCID/J mice bearing xenograft ccRCC Caki-1 tumors to evaluate the in vivo efficacies of two titanium-gold compounds Titanocref and Titanofin (based on auranofin analogue scaffolds) accompanied by pharmacokinetic and pathology studies. A therapeutic trial was performed over 21 days at 5 mg/kg/72h of Titanocref and 10 mg/kg/72h of Titanofin tracking changes in tumor size. We observed a significant reduction of 51% and 60%, respectively (p < 0.01) in tumor size in the Titanocref- and Titanofin-treated mice compared to the starting size, while the vehicle-treated mice exhibited a tumor size increase of 138% (p < 0.01). Importantly, no signs of pathological complication as a result of treatment were found. In addition, Titanocref and Titanofin treatment reduced angiogenesis by 38% and 54%, respectively. Microarray and qRT-PCR analysis of ccRCC Caki-1 cells treated with Titanocref revealed that the compound alters apoptosis, JNK MAP kinase, and ROS pathways within 3 h of treatment. We further show activation of apoptosis by Titanocref and Titanofin in vivo by caspase 3 assay. Titanocref is active against additional kidney cancer cells. Titanocref and Titanofin are therefore promising candidates for further evaluation toward clinical application in the treatment of ccRCC.

Nanocarrier-mediated antioxidant delivery for liver diseases

Liver is the principal detoxifying organ and metabolizes various compounds that produce free radicals (FR) constantly. To maintain the oxidative/antioxidative balance in the liver, antioxidants would scavenge FR by preventing tissue damage through FR formation, scavenging, or by enhancing their decomposition. The disruption of this balance therefore leads to oxidative stress and in turn leads to the onset of various diseases. Supplying the liver with exogeneous antioxidants is an effective way to recreate the oxidative/antioxidative balance in the liver homeostasis. Nevertheless, due to the short half-life and instability of antioxidants in circulation, the methodology for delivering antioxidants to the liver needs to be improved. Nanocarrier mediated delivery of antioxidants proved to be an ingenious way to safely and efficiently deliver a high payload of antioxidants into the liver for circumventing liver diseases. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the role of reactive oxygen species (oxidant) and ROS scavengers (antioxidant) in liver diseases. Subsequently, current nanocarrier mediated antioxidant delivery methods for liver diseases are discussed.

Improvements in SOD mimic AEOL-10150, a potent broad-spectrum antioxidant

AEOL-10150 is a broad-spectrum metalloporphyrin superoxidase dismutase (SOD) mimic specifically designed to neutralize reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Research has shown that AEOL-10150 is a potent medical countermeasure against national security threats including sulfur mustard (SM), nerve agent exposure and radiation pneumonitis following a radiological/nuclear incident sufficient to cause acute radiation syndrome (ARS). AEOL-10150 performed well in animal safety studies, and two completed phase 1 safety studies in patients demonstrated that the drug was safe and well tolerated, indicating that AEOL-10150 has potential as a new catalytic antioxidant drug. In this article, we review improvements in AEOL-10150 in preclinical pharmacodynamic studies, especially regarding anti-SM, chlorine gas and radiation exposure studies.

Commentary: The Pharmacological Antioxidant Amifostine—Implications of Recent Research for Integrative Cancer Care

Amifostine is a pharmacological antioxidant used as a cytoprotectant in cancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. It is thought to protect normal tissues relative to tumor tissue against oxidative damage inflicted by cancer therapies by becoming concentrated at higher levels in normal tissues. The degree to which amifostine nevertheless accumulates in tumors and protects them against cancer therapies has been debated. Guidelines have been published that direct its use in chemotherapy and radiation, taking into consideration the concerns of tumor protection. In this article, clinical studies of amifostine appearing since the publication of the most recent set of guidelines are reviewed. Randomized and nonrandomized trials of regimens involving chemo-therapeutic agents (chemotherapy, chemoradiation, conditioning regimens for bone marrow transplant) are discussed. Nineteen studies showed positive effects for amifostine reducing the level of side effects of these regimens, while 9 showed no effect and 1 had a questionable result. Clinically relevant levels of amifostine toxicity were observed in several studies, but subcutaneous administration may reduce such toxicity. Amifostine showed protection against mucositis, esophagitis, neuropathy, and other side effects, although protection against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity was not observed. No evidence of tumor protection was observed. Amifostine may enable populations unable to tolerate conventional cancer therapy to receive treatment of their cancers, even if some degree of tumor protection is eventually discovered. The authors discuss the implications of this research for patient populations seen in integrative cancer care centers and for research on phytochemical antioxidants such as vitamins and carotenoids.

Mechanism-based management for mucositis: option for treating side effects without compromising the efficacy of cancer therapy

Mucositis is a major side effect induced by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Although mucositis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, management is largely limited to controlling symptoms, and few therapeutic agents are available for treatment. Since mucositis could be inhibited by the modulation of radiotherapy- or chemotherapy-induced pathways independently of cancer treatment, there is an opportunity for the development of more targeted therapies and interventions. This article examined potential therapeutic agents that have been investigated for the prevention and/or inhibition of mucositis induced by conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. They can be classified according to their mechanisms of action: scavenging reactive oxygen species, inhibition of specific cytokine production or inflammation, and inhibition of apoptosis. These early events may be good target pathways for preventing the pathogenesis of mucositis. Considering that both cancer therapy and therapeutic agents for mucositis act on both normal and cancer cells, agents that inhibit mucositis should act through mechanisms that selectively protect normal cells without compromising cancer treatment. Therefore, mechanism-based guidance for the treatment of mucositis is critical to prevent risky treatments for cancer patients and to relieve detrimental side effects effectively from cancer therapy.

Anti-inflammatory/antioxidant use in long-term maintenance cancer therapy: a new therapeutic approach to disease progression and recurrence

The chronic, progressive clinical characteristics of many adult solid tumor malignancies suggest that a more effective therapeutic approach to cancer management may require long-term intervention using nontoxic systemic agents that block critical components of abnormal tumor physiology. Two highly promising systemic targets common to the development, progression and recurrence of many common cancers are dysregulated inflammatory and oxidation/reduction (redox) pathways. Compelling clinical data support the use of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant agents as a therapeutic modality for long-term use in patients diagnosed with several common cancers, including colon cancer and breast cancer. The therapeutic paradigm presented in this paper is the product of a synthesis of what is currently understood about the biological effects of inflammation and oxidative stress that contribute to tumorigenesis, disease progression and recurrence as well as results obtained from research on the use of prophylactics with anti-inflammatory or antioxidant properties in cancer prevention and treatment.

Is it time for a new paradigm for systemic cancer treatment? Lessons from a century of cancer chemotherapy

U.S. SEER (Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results) data for age-adjusted mortality rates for all cancers combined for all races show only a modest overall 13% decline over the past 35 years. Moreover, the greatest contributor to cancer mortality is treatment-resistant metastatic disease. The accepted therapeutic paradigm for the past half-century for the treatment of advanced cancers has involved the use of systemic chemotherapy drugs cytotoxic for cycling cells (both normal and malignant) during DNA synthesis and/or mitosis. The failure of this therapeutic modality to achieve high-level, consistent rates of disease-free survival for some of the most common cancers, including tumors of the lung, colon breast, brain, melanoma, and others is the focus of this paper. A retrospective assessment of critical milestones in cancer chemotherapy indicates that most successful therapeutic regimens use cytotoxic cell cycle inhibitors in combined, maximum tolerated, dose-dense acute treatment regimens originally developed to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia and some lymphomas. Early clinical successes in this area led to their wholesale application to the treatment of solid tumor malignancies that, unfortunately, has not produced consistent, long-term high cure rates for many common cancers. Important differences in therapeutic sensitivity of leukemias/lymphomas versus solid tumors can be explained by key biological differences that define the treatment-resistant solid tumor phenotype. A review of these clinical outcome data in the context of recent developments in our understanding of drug resistance mechanisms characteristic of solid tumors suggests the need for a new paradigm for the treatment of chemotherapy-resistant cancers. In contrast to reductionist approaches, the systemic approach targets both microenvironmental and systemic factors that drive and sustain tumor progression. These systemic factors include dysregulated inflammatory and oxidation pathways shown to be directly implicated in the development and maintenance of the cancer phenotype. The paradigm stresses the importance of a combined preventive/therapeutic approach involving adjuvant chemotherapies that incorporate anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant therapeutics.

Prostate-specific natural health products (dietary supplements) radiosensitize normal prostate cells

PURPOSE

Prostate-specific health products (dietary supplements) are taken by cancer patients to alleviate the symptoms linked with poor prostate health. However, the effect of these agents on evidence-based radiotherapy practice is poorly understood. The present study aimed to determine whether dietary supplements radiosensitized normal prostate or prostate cancer cell lines.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Three well-known prostate-specific dietary supplements were purchased from commercial sources available to patients (Trinovin, Provelex, and Prostate Rx). The cells used in the study included normal prostate lines (RWPE-1 and PWR-1E), prostate tumor lines (PC3, DU145, and LNCaP), and a normal nonprostate line (HaCaT). Supplement toxicity was assessed using cell proliferation assays [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] and cellular radiosensitivity using conventional clonogenic assays (0.5-4Gy). Cell cycle kinetics were assessed using the bromodeoxyuridine/propidium iodide pulse-labeling technique, apoptosis by scoring caspase-3 activation, and DNA repair by assessing gammaH2AX.

RESULTS

The cell growth and radiosensitivity of the malignant PC3, DU145, and LNcaP cells were not affected by any of the dietary prostate supplements (Provelex [2 microg/mL], Trinovin [10 microg/mL], and Prostate Rx [50 microg/mL]). However, both Trinovin (10 microg/mL) and Prostate Rx (6 microg/mL) inhibited the growth rate of the normal prostate cell lines. Prostate Rx increased cellular radiosensitivity of RWPE-1 cells through the inhibition of DNA repair.

CONCLUSION

The use of prostate-specific dietary supplements should be discouraged during radiotherapy owing to the preferential radiosensitization of normal prostate cells.

Children's Oncology Group (COG) Nutrition Committee

The Children's Oncology Group (COG) Nutrition Committee was established to further the knowledge of nutrition in children with cancer by education and the conduct of clinical trials. A survey of COG institutions revealed lack of conformity in evaluation and categorization of nutritional status, and criteria for nutritional intervention. The Committee subsequently established specific categories of malnutrition (Underweight and Overweight) based on ideal body weight or body mass index. An algorithm was developed as a guideline for nutritional intervention as well as references and resources for determining estimated needs. The Committee embarked on concepts for clinical trials of nutritional interventions. The first pilot study, evaluating the feasibility of using an immunoneutraceutical precursor for glutathione production, has been completed. This study showed weight gain and improvement in glutathione status. A pilot trial of proactive enteral feeding for patients at high risk of malnutrition has commenced. The Committee believes that nutrition is relevant to all aspects of cancer control. The paucity of nutritional investigation in children with cancer needs to be rectified.

A strategy for controlling potential interactions between natural health products and chemotherapy: a review in pediatric oncology

The high prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use including natural health products (NHPs) in the pediatric oncology population is well established. The potential for concurrent use of NHPs with conventional chemotherapy necessitates physician awareness regarding the potential risks and benefits that might come from this coadministration. Knowledge of interactions between NHPs and chemotherapy is poorly characterized; however, an understanding of potential mechanisms of interaction by researchers and clinicians is important. Concerns regarding the use of antioxidants during chemotherapy are controversial and evidence exists to support both adherents and detractors in this debate. Our review addresses issues regarding potential interactions between NHPs and chemotherapies used in pediatric oncology from a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspective. Examples of combinations of NHP and chemotherapies are briefly presented in addition to a strategy to avoid (or induce) a possible interaction between a NHP and chemotherapy. In conclusion, more clinical research is needed to substantiate or preclude the use of NHPs in the treatment of cancer and especially in combination with chemotherapy.

The Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine By Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy

OBJECTIVE

Use of complementary alternative medicine (CAM) is widespread among patients with chronic diseases including cancer. The purpose of our study was to examine the pattern of alternative medicine use in patients undergoing radiation treatment of cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among cancer patients treated with radiation therapy from July 2003 through July 2005 at the University of Cincinnati. We defined CAM as the use of dietary supplements, massage therapy, prayer, acupuncture, chiropractic, and other novel therapies undertaken after their diagnosis with cancer.

RESULTS

There were 152 patients that participated in the study. Their median age was 59 (range, 21-85), 82 (54%) were males, 108 (69%) were Caucasian. Out of 152 patients, 104 (68%) patients were users of CAM. The most common CAM modality reported was prayer 85 (82%) and use of dietary supplements 84 (80%). The majority of users were female and well-educated. Among CAM users 60 (58%) had discussed its use with their physician. Level of education, employment status and income showed a significant correlation with the use of CAM.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the use of complementary alternative medicine among cancer patients receiving radiation therapy is frequent. Given the potential risks with some CAM therapies, physicians should actively ask patients whether they use CAM and provide appropriate counseling.

Properties of normal and glycated human hemoglobin in presence and absence of antioxidant

We present a novel approach to study properties of normal (HbA) and nonenzymatically glycated (HbA(Ic), HbA(Ia+b)) human hemoglobin using absorption spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. The effect of the presence of the antioxidant fisetin on glycation of HbA is studied. Here, absorption spectroscopy has been fruitfully exploited to observe the formation of the glycated hemoglobin. With the differential scanning calorimetry, we studied the thermal unfolding of the protein hemoglobin at various conditions. The thermogram of the pure HbA showed two transition regions, with the occurrence of a partially unfolded intermediate state (the formation of which is mainly reversible) prior to complete denaturation (irreversible process). The denaturation temperature of HbA was found to be strongly dependent on the heating rate. Furthermore, there is a significant cooperativity between the two transition regions in pure HbA. The overall denaturation for the glycated hemoglobin takes place at a lower temperature, suggesting a decrease in the stability of the protein when it is glycated. In presence of fisetin, glycation is inhibited to a certain extent and the thermograms match well with that of normal HbA. Implications of the results are discussed.

Pycnogenol® protects against Ionizing radiation as shown in the intestinal mucosa of rats exposed to X-rays

X-rays and gamma radiation delivered to the abdominal region for cancer treatment encompasses severe damage to the intestinal mucosa, which significantly impairs a patient's quality of life. To a great extent the deleterious effects of x-radiation originate from radiolysis-induced reactive oxygen species. The well-researched powerful antioxidant Pycnogenol was administered orally to rats prior to x-irradiation with 15 Gy. Histological sections of the intestines showed a dramatically better condition of the mucosal layers compared with the irradiated control animals administered water without Pycnogenol. Pycnogenol treatment significantly preserved the height and number of villi as well as the glandular layer and a diminished number of congested vases were present. No intestinal alterations were seen in control animals receiving Pycnogenol in the absence of radiation. It is concluded that Pycnogenol provides significant protection from ionizing radiation damage.

Reintroduction to nutrition and cancer treatment

OBJECTIVES

To review what constitutes optimal nutrition for the cancer patient.

DATA SOURCES

Conventional nutrition, botanical and biomedical journals and texts, electronic media, databases, and abstracts.

CONCLUSION

Optimal nutrition is neither a complementary nor alternative treatment, but is the fundamental groundwork for the creation of the most favorable cancer treatment outcomes as presented in numerous study findings and journal articles. The two main topics of this article are (1) general food choices and decisions that can affect treatment outcomes; and (2) a brief look at the specific scientific application of individual nutrients to affect a positive impact on treatment, protection of healthy cells and tissues, side-effect mitigation, and quality of life for cancer patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

It is critical for health care providers to both acknowledge and apply the principles of nutrition for cancer patients both in general and as part of a therapeutic regimen. It is important for nursing staff to understand that nutritional elements can promote or detract from cancer treatment and recovery.