Clinical outcomes of celiac artery coverage vs preservation during thoracic endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

Adequate proximal and distal seal zones are necessary for successful thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Often, the achievement of an adequate distal seal zone requires celiac artery (CA) coverage by endograft with or without preservation of CA blood flow. The outcomes of CA coverage without its flow preservation were studied only in small case series. This study aims to determine the difference in outcomes between CA coverage with vs without preservation of CA blood flow during TEVAR using a multi-institutional national database.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative database was reviewed for all TEVAR patients distally landing in zone 6. The cohort was divided into TEVAR with vs without CA flow preservation. Demographic, clinical, and perioperative characteristics, as well as postoperative mortality, morbidities, and complications, were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 25,549 reviewed patients, 772 had a distal landing in Zone 6, 212 of which (27.5%) had TEVAR without CA flow preservation, whereas 560 (72.5%) underwent TEVAR with CA flow preservation. Indications for TEVAR were aneurysm in 431 (55.8%), dissection in 247 (32.0%), or other in 94 (12.2%) cases. Patients who underwent TEVAR without CA flow preservation had statistically significantly higher rates of 30-day mortality (11.3% vs 5.9%; P = .010), 30-day disease/treatment-related mortality (8.0% vs 4.3%; P = .039), as well as a tendency of increased intestinal ischemia requiring intervention (1.9% vs 0.5%; P = .077). After adjusting for potential confounders, CA coverage without flow preservation was associated with more than a two-fold increase in the overall 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-5.92; P = .006) and 30-day disease/treatment-related mortality (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.11-6.72; P = .029). In a sub-group analysis based on disease pathology, these results persisted only in the aneurysm group (30-day mortality [OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.01-5.48; P = .047]; 30-day disease/treatment-related mortality [OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.08-7.67; P = .034]), whereas there was no significant association between CA flow preservation status and the endpoints in the dissection subgroup (30-day mortality [OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.22-6.05; P = .856], 30-day disease/treatment-related mortality [OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.16-5.19; P = .911]).

CONCLUSIONS

CA coverage during TEVAR without preservation of its blood flow is associated with significantly higher mortality in patients with aortic aneurysm, but not dissection. In patients with aortic aneurysm, CA flow should be preserved during TEVAR whenever feasible, whereas in patients with dissection, it may be safe to cover CA without preservation of its flow. Prospective studies should be done to confirm these findings and compare the open vs endovascular revascularization techniques on outcomes.

Anaesthesia for vascular emergencies - a state of the art review

In this state-of-the-art review, we discuss the presenting symptoms and management strategies for vascular emergencies. Although vascular emergencies are best treated at a vascular surgical centre, patients may present to any emergency department and may require both immediate management and safe transport to a vascular centre. We describe the surgical and anaesthetic considerations for management of aortic dissection, aortic rupture, carotid endarterectomy, acute limb ischaemia and mesenteric ischaemia. Important issues to consider in aortic dissection are extent of the dissection and surgical need for bypasses in addition to endovascular repair. From an anaesthetist's perspective, aortic dissection requires infrastructure for massive transfusion, smooth management should an endovascular procedure require conversion to an open procedure, haemodynamic manipulation during stent deployment and prevention of spinal cord ischaemia. Principles in management of aortic rupture, whether open or endovascular treatment is chosen, include immediate transfer to a vascular care centre; minimising haemodynamic changes to reduce aortic shear stress; permissive hypotension in the pre-operative period; and initiation of massive transfusion protocol. Carotid endarterectomy for carotid stenosis is managed with general or regional techniques, and anaesthetists must be prepared to manage haemodynamic, neurological and airway issues peri-operatively. Acute limb ischaemia is a result of embolism, thrombosis, dissection or trauma, and may be treated with open repair or embolectomy, under either general or local anaesthesia. Due to hypercoagulability, there may be higher numbers of acutely ischaemic limbs among patients with COVID-19, which is important to consider in the current pandemic. Mesenteric ischaemia is a rare vascular emergency, but it is challenging to diagnose and associated with high morbidity and mortality. Several peri-operative issues are common to all vascular emergencies: acute renal injury; management of transfusion; need for heparinisation and reversal; and challenging postoperative care. Finally, the important development of endovascular techniques for repair in many vascular emergencies has improved care, and the availability of transoesophageal echocardiography has improved monitoring as well as aids in surgical placement of endovascular grafts and for post-procedural evaluation.

Tips and tricks about surgeon-modified fenestrated stent grafting for celiac truncus

Currently, thoracic endovascular aortic repair is usually the first-line treatment option for descending aortic pathologies. Supra-aortic or visceral branches sometimes involve assistive thoracic endovascular aortic repair techniques; hybrid procedures or intentional coverage may be performed during the procedure to achieve a sufficient proximal or distal landing zone. Most surgeons may agree on selective coverage of celiac truncus, but revascularization is preferred to reduce the risk of ischemic complications. Herein, we present the first successful surgeonmodified fenestrated stent graft procedure for celiac truncus in a patient with Crawford type V descending aortic aneurysm in Türkiye.

Endovascular Repair of Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms

Descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (DTAAs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Once diagnosed, they should be surveilled and then repaired at a diameter of 5.5 to 6 cm, depending on the individual patient's physiologic and anatomic risk of repair. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the preferred approach for repair and there are multiple procedural adjuncts that can expand indications for and use of TEVAR. Spinal cord injuries are an important and highly morbid complication after TEVAR and it is imperative to mitigate this risk.

Safety and Efficacy of Intentional Celiac Artery Coverage in Endovascular Management of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) has emerged as an attractive alternative option in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) diseases, reporting lower morbidity and mortality rates compared with open or hybrid repair. A challenging situation arises when the aneurysm involves the celiac artery (CA), precluding a safe distal landing zone. We investigated the safety and efficacy of CA coverage in the treatment of complex TAAA diseases during endovascular management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The electronic bibliographic sources searched were MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases. Primary outcomes of interest were perioperative and 30-day mortality. Any type of endoleak, mesenteric ischemia, perioperative spinal cord ischemia, and reintervention rates were secondary end points. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Summary statistics of event risks were expressed as proportions and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Ten observational cohort studies published between 2009 and 2020, reporting a total of 175 patients, were eligible for quantitative synthesis. Indications for TEVAR were primary TAAAs in 82% of patients, aortic dissection in 14% of patients, type Ib endoleak after previous endograft deployment in 3% of patients, and penetrating aortic ulcer in 1 patient. Reintervention rate was 9% (95% CI, 4%-20%) and spinal cord ischemia was 7% (95% CI, 4%--12%). Type II endoleak was the predominant type of endoleak in 10% of patients (95% CI, 4%-22%), followed by type I endoleak in 5% of patients (95% CI, 2%-12%) and type III endoleak in 1% (95% CI, 0%-16%) of patients. Mesenteric ischemia occurred in 6% of patients (95% CI, 3%-10%). Thirty-day mortality was 5% (95% CI, 2%-13%) and the pooled estimate for overall mortality was 21% (95% CI, 14%-31%).

CONCLUSIONS

Celiac artery coverage during TEVAR is a challenging but feasible option for the treatment of TAAA diseases, providing acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Demonstration of adequate visceral collateral pathways before definitive CA coverage is the sine quo non for the success of the technique.

Celiac Artery Coverage After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Procedure: A Meta-Analysis of Early and Late Results

BACKGROUND/AIM

Clinical outcomes of celiac artery (CA) coverage during aortic procedures are often contradicting and the fate of this additional maneuver is still unclear. This study summarizes the results of available literature and aims to clarify the impact of CA coverage during thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) in patients with inadequate distal sealing zone.

METHODS

Prospective and retrospective, observational original articles focused on CA coverage during elective/urgent TEVAR for descending thoracic aortic pathology (DTAP) were included. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database were examined to identify articles published from January 2007 to December 2020, according to PRISMA guidelines. Early and late visceral (any sign or symptom reported) and neurological (both transient and permanent) complications were considered as primary outcomes. Onset of any endoleak, type IB endoleak, need of reintervention, and TEVAR-related mortality were considered as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 5618 articles were extracted for analysis and 13 studies were finally included in the synthesis. A total of 178 CAs were covered during 2653 TEVAR (7%). Spinal cord ischemia was 8% (95% CI, 5-14%, I² 0%) Any endoleak and type IB endoleak was observed in 12% (95% CI, 6-21%, I² 17%) and 5% (95% CI, 2-11%, I² 0%), respectively. Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair-related reoperation was necessary in 8% (95% CI, 4-14%, I² 0%), the majority of which (14/18, 78%) performed for distal sealing failure; mortality rate was 9% (95% CI, 5-14%, I² 0%). Out of 178 patients, 168 (94%) were available for follow-up, ranged 12 to 42 months. Visceral complications, any endoleak, and type IB endoleak were identified in 15% (95% CI, 10-23%, I² 45%), 20% (95% CI, 13-29%, I² 8%), and 8% (95% CI, 4-15%, I² 0%), respectively. Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair-related reintervention was required in 8% (95% CI, 4-14%, I² 0%). Mortality rate was 17% (95% CI, 12-25%, I² 4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Celiac artery coverage in DTAP should be regarded as a "bailout" procedure especially in urgent/emergent settings but requires caution in elective cases. Even if transient visceral ischemia is frequent, life-threatening complications are rare. Early and late mortality rates are similar to standard TEVAR although the risk of type IB endoleak and reintervention may be an issue.

Occlusion of the Celiac Artery during Endovascular Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Is associated with Increased Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality

BACKGROUND

Some studies suggest that celiac artery coverage during elective endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair is safe given sufficient collateralization of visceral organ perfusion from the superior mesenteric artery. However, there is concern that celiac artery coverage may lead to increased risk of foregut or spinal cord ischemia with an attendant increased risk of mortality. We sought to investigate rates of bowel ischemia, spinal cord ischemia, and 30-day mortality associated with celiac artery coverage during TEVAR and complex EVAR.

METHODS

The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried for TEVAR and complex EVAR cases from 2012 to 2018. Inclusion criteria included TAAA pathology and endograft extension to aortic zone 6. Patients with aortic rupture, trauma, prior thoracic aortic surgery, known preoperative occlusion of the left subclavian superior mesenteric, or celiac arteries were excluded. Cases with intraoperative celiac artery occlusion (CAO) were compared retrospectively to cases with celiac artery preservation (CAP). Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality and a composite end point of 30-day mortality, spinal cord ischemia (transient or permanent lower extremity neurologic deficit), and bowel ischemia (colonoscopic evidence of ischemia, bloody stools in a patient who dies prior to colonoscopy or laparotomy, or other documented clinical diagnosis). Univariable comparisons were performed using chi-squared tests and Student's t-tests, as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to identify independent predictors of outcome.

RESULTS

There were 628 cases identified for inclusion in the study. Patients undergoing CAO (n = 44) were more likely to be female or to have higher rates of preoperative spinal drain use, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3, low preop hemoglobin, and/or symptomatic presentation, but fewer mean number of aortic zones covered. CAO was associated with higher 30-day mortality (5 of 44, 11%) compared to CAP (23 of 584, 4%), P = 0.039. The composite end point occurred at a significantly greater proportion for those who had CAO (10 of 44, 23%) compared to CAP (53 of 584, 9%, P = 0.008), driven by higher rates of 30-day mortality and bowel ischemia (9% vs. 2%, P = 0.026). By multivariate analysis, CAO was predictive of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-13.8, P = 0.04) and the composite endpoint (OR = 3.0, 95% CI = 1.1-8.5, P = 0.03). Increasing procedure time was also associated with 30-day mortality (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1-1.7, P < 0.001) and the composite end point (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1-1.6, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For those treated for TAAAs, CAO was independently predictive of increased 30-day mortality and a composite end point of perioperative mortality, spinal cord ischemia, and bowel ischemia. When treating patients with extensive aortic aneurysmal disease, physicians should attempt to preserve the celiac artery, by revascularization or avoiding ostium coverage, whenever feasible.

Endovascular stent graft repair of aortogastric fistula caused by peptic ulcer after esophagectomy: A case report

RATIONALE

Aortogastric fistula (AGF) is a rare but devastating clinical complication after esophagectomy. In a recent report, nearly all AGF patients died of massive hemorrhage or aspiration of massive hematemesis. Therefore, timely appropriate treatment of AGF remains a challenge.Herein, we report a case of AGF that resulted from peptic ulceration after esophagectomy and was successfully treated with endovascular stent graft placement.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 59-year-old man had undergone video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal reconstruction using a gastric tube 14 months previously. He suddenly experienced massive hematemesis and unstable circulatory dynamics, Infusion was performed to treat critical hemorrhagic shock but was ineffective. We informed the patient and his family members of the situation, and once written informed consent to treatment was provided, we rushed him to the operating room.

DIAGNOSES

Contrast medium permeated into the gastric cavity through a fistula between the abdominal aorta and gastric tube at the 11th thoracic level, Based on this, we made a diagnosis of AGF resulting from a peptic ulcer, and this diagnosis was further confirmed by high pressure angiography combined with computed tomography (CT) imaging.

INTERVENTIONS

An endovascular stent graft was placed under the guidance of digital subtraction angiography and followed by antibiotic therapy to prevent infection and proton pump inhibitor therapy to inhibit gastric acid secretion.

OUTCOMES

The patient recovered uneventfully after the procedure. Four months after surgery, the patient died of organ failure caused by retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis and multiple intrahepatic metastases, with no postoperative bleeding linked to the endovascular stent graft repair.

LESSONS

Our case supports the notion that endovascular stent graft repair is a feasible alternative in treatment of AGF with several advantages in addition to surgical intervention, although more such cases should be collected and analyzed in the future to corroborate our observations.

Celiac artery aneurysm diagnosis and repair in the postpartum female

A postpartum female presented with aching abdominal pain as well as persistently elevated blood pressure poorly controlled by medication. Computed tomography angiography was performed and identified an aneursym of the celiac artery proximal to its branching points. Due to symptomatic presentation of the patient and plans of future pregnancy, surgical repair of the aneursym was planned and performed 2 months following initial diagnosis. Celiac artery aneurysms are rare types of visceral artery aneursyms (VAAs) and comprise ~4% of all VAAs.

Acute pancreatitis caused by pancreatic ischemia after TEVAR combined with intentional celiac artery coverage and embolization of the branches of the celiac artery

Covering and embolizing the celiac artery has been reported to be a relatively safe procedure, owing to the rich collateral pathway between the celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery. A 69-year-old man presented with an aneurysm on the distal descending aorta. The proximity of the aneurysm to the celiac artery origin necessitated covering the artery with a stent graft. Additionally, the celiac trunk was short, increasing the risk for Type II endoleak. The origin of the celiac artery was covered after embolization of the branches of the celiac artery. Postoperatively, nausea and abdominal pain appeared, and the amylase level and white blood cell count were elevated. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and abdominal ultrasonography revealed necrosis and cyst formation in the pancreatic tail, resulting in a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis caused by pancreatic ischemia. Conservative treatment was applied. After discharge, although walled-off necrosis remained, the patient was doing well, without any clinical symptoms.

Preoperative Diagnostic Angiogram and Endovascular Aortic Stent Placement for Appleby Resection Candidates: A Novel Surgical Technique in the Management of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Background. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail usually presents late and is typically unresectable. The modified Appleby procedure allows resection of pancreatic body carcinoma with celiac axis (CA) invasion. Given that the feasibility of this technique is based on the presence of collateral circulation, it is crucial to confirm the presence of an anatomical and functional collateral system. Methods. We here describe a novel technique used in two patients who were candidates for Appleby resection. We present their clinical scenario, imaging, operative findings, and postoperative course. Results. Both patients had a preoperative angiogram for assessment of anatomical circulation and placement of an endovascular stent to cover the CA. We hypothesize that this new technique allows enhancement of collateral circulation and helps minimize intraoperative blood loss when transecting the CA at its takeoff. Moreover, extra length on the CA margin may be gained, as the artery can be transected at its origin without the need for vascular clamp placement. Conclusion. We propose this novel technique in the preoperative management of patients who are undergoing a modified Appleby procedure. While further experience with this technique is required, we believe that it confers significant advantages to the current standard of care.

Complicated type B aortic dissection causing ischemia in the celiac and inferior mesenteric artery distribution despite patent superior mesenteric artery bypass

Mortality rates associated with acute type B aortic dissection (ABAD) complicated by malperfusion remains significant. Optimal management of patients with ABAD is still debatable. We present a case report of a 50-year-old man who was admitted due to ABAD. He was treated medically with his pain resolved and he was discharged on oral antihypertensive medications. One month after initial diagnosis, he was readmitted with abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. On imaging, an extension of the aortic dissection into the visceral arteries with occlusion of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries (SMA) was noted. He underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and bypass grafting to the SMA. Despite the intervention, the patient developed large bowel, liver, and gastric ischemia and underwent bowel resection. He died from multi-organ failure. In selected cases of uncomplicated ABAD, TEVAR should be considered and when TEVAR fails and visceral malperfusion develops, an aggressive revascularization of multiple visceral arteries should be attempted.

Suprarenal fixation resulting in intestinal ischemia after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) may be associated with specific stent- and procedure-related complications. Hepatic artery anatomic variability may lead to dramatic consequences when unanticipated. A 64-year-old man presented with a 6-cm abdominal aortic aneurysm, suitable for an EVAR procedure. The EVAR procedure was uneventful and the patient was discharged after 2 days. After 2 weeks, he was readmitted for recurrent upper abdominal pain due to acute cholecystitis. The postoperative EVAR computed tomography scan was revisited and the suprarenal bare-metal stent of the Zenith device overlapped the highly calcified origin of both the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the celiac trunk. Moreover, the patient appeared to have a right replaced hepatic artery originating from the SMA. He developed diffuse, patchy ischemia of both the large and the entire small bowel, and quickly became unresponsive to vasopressor drugs. He died shortly thereafter. An EVAR procedure may result in a highly complicated course when hepatic artery anatomic variability is present. Fenestrated EVAR or proximal graft scallops should be considered for cases in which the proximal sealing zone is diseased and flow to visceral vessels is compromised.

Peripheral arterial aneurysms: open or endovascular surgery?

Peripheral arterial aneurysms are uncommon; for some aneurysm types, data are limited to case reports and small case series. There is no Level A evidence in most cases to determine the choice between open or endovascular intervention. The evolution of endovascular technology has vastly improved the armamentarium available to the vascular surgeon and interventionalists in the management of these rare and unusual aneurysms. The choice of operative approach will ultimately be determined on an individual basis, dependent on the patient risk factors, and aneurysm anatomy. After consideration, some aneurysms (femoral, subclavian, carotid and ECAA) fare better with an open first approach; renal, splenic and some visceral artery aneurysms do better with an endovascular first approach. In our practice PAAs are treated with an endovascular first approach. For these rare conditions, both open and endovascular therapy will continue to work in harmony to enhance and extend the capabilities of modern surgical management.

Balloon-assisted coil embolization of the celiac trunk before endovascular aortic repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm

PURPOSE

Celiac trunk coil embolization before thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm involving the celiac trunk can prevent type II endoleaks. One disadvantage of conventional coil embolization is the risk of coil displacement. We performed coil embolization under balloon occlusion of the celiac trunk to address this issue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between December 2008 and January 2011, 5 patients (3 men and 2 women, mean age 76 years) were included in this study. For all patients, after confirming the collateral blood flow from the superior mesenteric artery via the pancreaticoduodenal arcades by using the balloon occlusion test, celiac trunk coil embolization proceeded under balloon occlusion of the proximal part of the celiac trunk.

RESULTS

Balloon-assisted coil embolization of the celiac trunk was completed for all patients without any complications. All coils were deployed as planned in the short segment of the celiac trunk without displacement. Coil migration, ischemic complications, and endoleaks via the celiac trunk did not arise in any of the patients over a follow-up period of 77-637 (mean 258) days.

CONCLUSIONS

Balloon-assisted coil embolization of the celiac trunk before TEVAR could be a feasible treatment option for suitable patients.

The role of interventional radiology in the management of abdominal visceral artery aneurysms

Abdominal visceral artery aneurysms (VAA) include true and false aneurysms. The majority are asymptomatic and are discovered on cross-sectional imaging performed for unrelated clinical indications. With the maturation of techniques and devices used for embolization procedures and the treatment of aneurysms in other locations, most VAAs are now suitable for treatment by minimally invasive transcatheter techniques. The choice of technique used greatly depends on the local anatomy of the VAA and the experience of the interventional radiologist in complex vascular interventional techniques.

Visceral artery aneurysms: review of current management options

Visceral artery aneurysms are relatively rare clinical entities, although their detection is rising due to an increased use of cross-sectional imaging. Rupture is the most devastating complication, and is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. For this reason, elective repair is preferable in the appropriately chosen patient. In general, splenic artery aneurysms measuring 2 cm or larger and those found in women of childbearing age and in persons undergoing liver transplantation should be treated. Hepatic artery aneurysms 2 cm or larger and those that are multiple or nonatherosclerotic in nature should be repaired in the appropriate patient due to a higher risk of rupture. Endovascular coil embolization has excellent success rates and is the first-line treatment for anatomically suitable splenic artery aneurysms and intrahepatic hepatic artery aneurysms. However, reperfusion is an important complication of endovascular management. Aneurysms involving the celiac, superior mesenteric, pancreaticoduodenal, gastroduodenal, and inferior mesenteric arteries, as well as visceral artery pseudoaneurysms, are unpredictable and should be repaired in the appropriate medical patient. These aneurysms are often amenable to ligation due to the presence of collateral circulation. Endovascular management is particularly useful in the treatment of pseudoaneurysms where comorbidities and previous surgery make open surgical repair less desirable. Mt Sinai J Med 77:296-303, 2010. (c) 2010 Mount Sinai School of Medicine.

Celiac trunk coverage in endovascular aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This retrospective study was undertaken to examine the risks associated with obstruction of the coeliac trunk in the process of treating aneurysms with endografting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

120 patients were treated by endografting for aneurysmal disease. Of these, a subgroup of 9 patients had their celiac trunk covered. If possible, a preoperative angiography was performed to evaluate collateral flow from the superior mesenteric artery. This was considered to predict the risk for ischemia.

RESULTS

None of the patients had any severe clinical event of the celiac trunk occlusion or clinical signs of intestinal ischemia. Three patients had transient increase of liver enzymes.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases where the distal landing zone of the descending thoracic aorta is to short for endografting, covering of the celiac trunk may be an option if no other surgical alter-native is apparent. Preoperative angiography to visualise the presence of collateral vessels from the superior mesenteric artery is recommended.

Endovascular repair of extent I thoracoabdominal aneurysms with landing zone extension into the aortic arch and mesenteric portion of the abdominal aorta

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has emerged as an alternative for patients at prohibitive risk for open thoracic or thoracoabdominal surgery, decreasing perioperative morbidity and mortality. Aneurysms that involve both the left subclavian artery (LSA) proximally and the celiac artery (CA) distally present a unique challenge to the use of TEVAR. We report a series of six high-risk patients presenting with extent I thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms who were successfully treated with TEVAR including coverage of the LSA and the CA.

Coverage of the celiac artery during TEVAR: is it ever appropriate?

Adequate seal at the proximal and distal extent of stent grafts in the aorta is paramount to the success of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Thoracoabdominal aneurysms pose a formidable challenge given their extension into the arch branches proximally and the visceral segment distally. Extension of the landing zone of even 3 to 5 mm can possibly increase the durability of the stent graft and may decrease the chances of future migration or collapse. Although coverage of the subclavian artery to extend the proximal landing zone has been met with initial success, the outcome of coverage of the celiac axis in order to extend the distal landing zone has not been as well studied. Because of the abundance of rich collateral vessels in the foregut, it has been perceived as a potentially safe practice. However, careful angiographic anatomic delineation and patient selection is vital to determine whether concomitant revascularization procedures are warranted.