1
|
Dubé K, Ndukwe SO, Korolkova A, Dee L, Sugarman J, Sauceda JA. Participant experiences in a combination HIV cure-related trial with extended analytical treatment interruption in San Francisco, United States. HIV Res Clin Pract 2024; 25:2312318. [PMID: 38348830 PMCID: PMC10951555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited systematic information available about the perspectives of participants enrolled in intensive combination HIV cure-related trials inclusive of an extended analytical treatment interruption (ATI). OBJECTIVE To assess and understand experiences of people with HIV involved in a combination HIV cure-related trial with an extended ATI. METHODS The trial included five interventions and was followed by an ATI lasting up to 52 wk. From 2022 - 2023, we conducted in-depth interviews with study participants following their extended ATIs. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed via conventional thematic analysis. RESULTS We interviewed seven participants. The majority were male, White, and non-Hispanic, with a median age of 37 years. Trust in the research team, scientific altruism and hope of becoming a post-intervention controller were key motivators for joining the trial. Interviewees reported being satisfied with their decision to participate in the trial and the extended ATI. Most recounted feelings of worry related to viral rebound during the ATI. Participants reported both defeat and relief with ART restart. Four faced challenges with protecting partners from HIV during their ATI, such as trying to find out if their partner(s) were using pre-exposure prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate potential improvements for future ATI trial participant experiences, such as more robust resources for psychosocial support and partner protections. Dedicating greater effort to understanding participant ATI experiences can inform the design of future participant-centered HIV cure trial protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health
(IDGPH), Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD), La
Jolla, CA, USA
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Samuel O. Ndukwe
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health
(IDGPH), Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD), La
Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ana Korolkova
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health
(IDGPH), Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD), La
Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Lynda Dee
- AIDS Action Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community
Engagement Coordinator, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, Baltimore,
MD, USA
| | - John A. Sauceda
- Division of Prevention Science, Center for AIDS Prevention
Studies (CAPS), San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Noorman MAJ, de Wit JBF, Marcos TA, Stutterheim SE, Jonas KJ, den Daas C. The Importance of Social Engagement in the Development of an HIV Cure: A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Perspectives. AIDS Behav 2023; 27:3789-3812. [PMID: 37329470 PMCID: PMC10589186 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-023-04095-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
As research into the development of an HIV cure gains prominence, assessing the perspectives of stakeholders becomes imperative. It empowers stakeholders to determine priorities and influence research processes. We conducted a systematic review of the empirical literature on stakeholder perspectives. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for empirical, peer-reviewed articles, published before September 2022. Our analysis of 78 papers showed that stakeholders could be divided into three categories: people with HIV, key populations, and professionals. Following thematic synthesis, two main themes were distinguished: stakeholders' perspectives on HIV cure research and stakeholders' perspectives on HIV cure. Research on perspectives on HIV cure research showed that stakeholders' hypothetical willingness to participate (WTP) in HIV cure research was relatively high, while actual WTP was found to be lower. Studies also identified associated (individual) characteristics of hypothetical WTP, as well as facilitators and barriers to hypothetical participation. Additionally, we reported research on experiences of actual HIV cure research participation. Our analysis of stakeholder perceptions of HIV cure showed that most stakeholders preferred a cure that could eliminate HIV and outlined positive associated impacts. Furthermore, we observed that most included studies were conducted among PWHIV, and in the Global North. To empower stakeholders, we recommend that future research include an even greater diversity of stakeholders and incorporate theories of behavior to further explore how stakeholders decide to meaningfully engage in every stage of HIV cure research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike A J Noorman
- Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, PO Box 80140, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - John B F de Wit
- Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, PO Box 80140, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tamika A Marcos
- Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah E Stutterheim
- Department of Health Promotion and Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kai J Jonas
- Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Chantal den Daas
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Health Psychology Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dubé K, Peterson B, Jones NL, Onorato A, Carter WB, Dannaway C, Johnson S, Hayes R, Hill M, Maddox R, Riley JL, Shull J, Metzger D, Montaner LJ. Community engagement group model in basic and biomedical research: lessons learned from the BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory towards an HIV-1 cure. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2023; 9:39. [PMID: 37291622 PMCID: PMC10248979 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00449-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Achieving effective community engagement has been an objective of U.S. National Institutes of Health-funded HIV research efforts, including participation of persons with HIV. Community Advisory Boards (CABs) have remained the predominant model for community engagement since their creation in 1989. As HIV cure-directed research efforts have grown into larger academic-industry partnerships directing resources toward both basic and clinical research under the Martin Delaney Collaboratories (MDC), community input models have also evolved. The BEAT-HIV MDC Collaboratory, based at The Wistar Institute in Philadelphia, United States, implemented a three-part model for community engagement that has shown success in providing greater impact for community engagement across basic, biomedical, and social sciences research efforts. DISCUSSION In this paper, we review the case study of the formation of the BEAT-HIV Community Engagement Group (CEG) model, starting with the historical partnership between The Wistar Institute as a basic research center and Philadelphia FIGHT as a not-for-profit community-based organization (CBO), and culminating with the growth of community engagement under the BEAT-HIV MDC. Second, we present the impact of a cooperative structure including a Community Advisory Board (CAB), CBO, and researchers through the BEAT-HIV CEG model, and highlight collaborative projects that demonstrate the potential strengths, challenges, and opportunities of this model. We also describe challenges and future opportunities for the use of the CEG model. CONCLUSIONS Our CEG model integrating a CBO, CAB and scientists could help move us towards the goal of effective, equitable and ethical engagement in HIV cure-directed research. In sharing our lessons learned, challenges and growing pains, we contribute to the science of community engagement into biomedical research efforts with an emphasis on HIV cure-directed research. Our documented experience with implementing the CEG supports greater discussion and independent implementation efforts for this model to engage communities into working teams in a way we find a meaningful, ethical, and sustainable model in support of basic, clinical/biomedical, social sciences and ethics research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
- Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Beth Peterson
- Wistar Institute, 3601 Spruce Street, Room 480, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nora L Jones
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amy Onorato
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - William B Carter
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christine Dannaway
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven Johnson
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Roy Hayes
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Marcus Hill
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rease Maddox
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James L Riley
- Department of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jane Shull
- Philadelphia FIGHT Community Health Centers, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David Metzger
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Luis J Montaner
- Wistar Institute, 3601 Spruce Street, Room 480, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saberi P, Campbell CK, Sauceda JA, Ndukwe S, Dubé K. Perceptions of Risks and Benefits of Participating in HIV Cure-Related Research Among Diverse Young Adults Living with HIV in the United States: Qualitative Research Findings. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2022; 38:649-659. [PMID: 35579937 PMCID: PMC9464049 DOI: 10.1089/aid.2021.0192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
In the United States, young adults have the highest rates of new HIV infections, and are less likely to be aware of their infection, be engaged in care, or achieve HIV viral suppression. As biomedical HIV research increasingly focuses on achieving long-term suppression without antiretroviral therapy (ART) and finding an HIV cure, little is known about perceptions of young adults living with HIV (YLWH) regarding HIV cure research. We recruited a diverse sample of 20 YLWH (18-29 years old) to participate in individual semistructured qualitative interviews to explore knowledge and perceptions of HIV cure research, and motivations and barriers to participation. Most participants had little knowledge of HIV cure research. Motivators of HIV cure research participation included altruism, stigma reduction, and the elimination of the clinical burdens of HIV. Barriers included potential physical side effects, psychological distress, the possibility of disclosure as a result of participating, and the amount of time required to participate. Most participants had concerns about analytic treatment interruptions (i.e., ART interruption to assess HIV remission), and indicated that they would want more frequent laboratory testing and protection for their sex partners during this time. Finally, participants suggested that, if other YLWH are considering participation in cure research, they should first learn as much as possible about the research, and then consider the potential personal benefits and the contribution that they could make to science and their communities. As HIV cure research advances, the participation of YLWH will be critical. Our study provides knowledge about how YLWH view HIV cure research. More sociobehavioral research is needed to ensure that those who are most likely to be the decision-makers and beneficiaries of an HIV cure are included at all levels of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parya Saberi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Prevention Science, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Address correspondence to: Parya Saberi, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Box 0886, 550 16th Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Chadwick K. Campbell
- Department of Medicine, Division of Prevention Science, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - John A. Sauceda
- Department of Medicine, Division of Prevention Science, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Samuel Ndukwe
- School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Gillings, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Karine Dubé
- School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Gillings, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dubé K, Eskaf S, Barr L, Palm D, Hogg E, Simoni JM, Sugarman J, Brown B, Sauceda JA, Henley L, Deeks S, Fox L, Gandhi RT, Smith D, Li JZ. Participant Perspectives and Experiences Following an Intensively Monitored Antiretroviral Pause in the United States: Results from the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5345 Biomarker Study. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2022; 38:510-517. [PMID: 35323030 PMCID: PMC9225827 DOI: 10.1089/aid.2021.0170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5345 study (NCT03001128) included an intensively monitored antiretroviral pause (IMAP), during which participants living with HIV temporarily stopped antiretroviral treatment (ART) in an effort to identify biomarkers that could predict HIV rebound. We evaluated the potential impact of the IMAP on A5345 study participants in the United States by questioning them immediately after the IMAP and at the end of the study. We administered longitudinal sociobehavioral questionnaires to participants following the IMAP when they resumed ART and at the end of the study. We summarized descriptive data from the post-IMAP and end-of-study questionnaires. Open-ended responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Reactions to pausing ART involved a mixture of curiosity and satisfaction from contributing to science. All participants indicated adherence with the ART interruption. About half (9/17) of post-IMAP questionnaire respondents reported having sexual partner(s) during the IMAP, and of those, nearly all (8/9) did not find it difficult to use measures to prevent HIV transmission to partners. The majority believed that they benefited from the study, yet some had elevated anxiety following the IMAP and at the end of the study. Most (24/29) respondents who completed the end-of-study questionnaire would recommend the study to other people living with HIV. Our findings underscore the relevance of the psychosocial aspects of participating in studies that involve interruptions of ART. Understanding how participants experience this research is invaluable for informing the design of future research aimed at sustained ART-free virologic suppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- Public Health Leadership Program and Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Address correspondence to: Karine Dubé, Public Health Leadership Program and Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, 4108 McGavran Greenberg Hall, Campus Box 7469, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7469, USA
| | - Shadi Eskaf
- UNC School of Government, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Liz Barr
- Community Scientific Sub-Committee, AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG), Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - David Palm
- Community Scientific Sub-Committee, AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG), Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases (IGHID), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Evelyn Hogg
- Social and Scientific Systems, Inc., a DLH Holdings Company, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Jane M. Simoni
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Department of Global Health, and Women, and Sexuality Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Department of Gender, Women, and Sexuality Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Brandon Brown
- Center for Healthy Communities, Department of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California, USA
| | - John A. Sauceda
- Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), Division of Prevention Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Laney Henley
- Public Health Leadership Program and Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Steven Deeks
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lawrence Fox
- Division of AIDS (DAIDS), National Institute of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Rajesh T. Gandhi
- Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Davey Smith
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Z. Li
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu B, An X, Wang C, Shin HY. Extending UTAUT with national identity and fairness to understand user adoption of DCEP in China. Sci Rep 2022; 12:6856. [PMID: 35477990 PMCID: PMC9046427 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10927-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The introduction of digital currency electronic payment (DCEP) by the Central Bank of China is conducive to the central bank's timely grasp of macroeconomic dynamics and the internationalization of RMB. As DCEP is one of the first digital currencies issued by the central bank to be used on a large scale internationally, it is necessary to conduct research on its user adoption. Therefore, this research extends the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to explore factors affecting the adoption of DCEP. The researchers cooperated with city banks that have started to use DCEP, and distributed questionnaires to users in the lobbies of these banks. A total of 295 valid questionnaires were empirically examined with Smart-PLS. The results indicate that perceived fairness, habits, social influence and national identity have significant effects on usage, with p values less than 0.05. National identity is shown to be a significant moderator of the relationships between perceived fairness, habit, perceived risk and usage, with p values less than 0.05. National identity is shown to have no moderating effect between social influence and usage, with a p value greater than 0.05. This research provides the central bank and the government with suggestions to increase user enthusiasm and reduce user perceived risks, thereby promoting the widespread use of DCEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bingyan Wu
- School of Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou City, 510632, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Xiaoqing An
- School of Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou City, 510632, Guangdong Province, China.
| | - Cong Wang
- School of Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou City, 510632, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ho Young Shin
- School of Business, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dubé K, Kanazawa J, Patel H, Louella M, Sylla L, Sheehy J, Dee L, Taylor J, Adair J, Anthony-Gonda K, Dropulić B, Sauceda JA, Peluso MJ, Deeks SG, Simoni J. Ethical and practical considerations for cell and gene therapy toward an HIV cure: findings from a qualitative in-depth interview study in the United States. BMC Med Ethics 2022; 23:39. [PMID: 35397551 PMCID: PMC8994300 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00780-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND HIV cure research involving cell and gene therapy has intensified in recent years. There is a growing need to identify ethical standards and safeguards to ensure cell and gene therapy (CGT) HIV cure research remains valued and acceptable to as many stakeholders as possible as it advances on a global scale. METHODS To elicit preliminary ethical and practical considerations to guide CGT HIV cure research, we implemented a qualitative, in-depth interview study with three key stakeholder groups in the United States: (1) biomedical HIV cure researchers, (2) bioethicists, and (3) community stakeholders. Interviews permitted evaluation of informants' perspectives on how CGT HIV cure research should ethically occur, and were transcribed verbatim. We applied conventional content analysis focused on inductive reasoning to analyze the rich qualitative data and derive key ethical and practical considerations related to CGT towards an HIV cure. RESULTS We interviewed 13 biomedical researchers, 5 community members, and 1 bioethicist. Informants generated considerations related to: perceived benefits of CGT towards an HIV cure, perceived risks, considerations necessary to ensure an acceptable benefit/risk balance, CGT strategies considered unacceptable, additional ethical considerations, and considerations for first-in-human CGT HIV cure trials. Informants also proposed important safeguards to developing CGT approaches towards an HIV cure, such as the importance of mitigating off-target effects, mitigating risks associated with long-term duration of CGT interventions, and mitigating risks of immune overreactions. CONCLUSION Our study identified preliminary considerations for CGT-based HIV cure across three key stakeholder groups. Respondents identified an ideal cure strategy as one which would durably control HIV infection, protect the individual from re-acquisition, and eliminate transmission to others. Known and unknown risks should be anticipated and perceived as learning opportunities to preserve and honor the altruism of participants. Preclinical studies should support these considerations and be transparently reviewed by regulatory experts and peers prior to first-in-human studies. To protect the public trust in CGT HIV cure research, ethical and practical considerations should be periodically revisited and updated as the science continues to evolve. Additional ethics studies are required to expand stakeholder participation to include traditionally marginalized groups and clinical care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27516 USA
| | - John Kanazawa
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Hursch Patel
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Michael Louella
- defeatHIV Collaboratory, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, E5-110, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
| | - Laurie Sylla
- defeatHIV Collaboratory, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, E5-110, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
| | - Jeff Sheehy
- Independent Consultant, 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1650, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
| | - Lynda Dee
- AIDS Action Baltimore, 14 East Eager Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board (CAB), 995 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
| | - Jeff Taylor
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board (CAB), 995 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
- HIV + Aging Research Project – Palm Springs (HARP-PS), 1775 East Palm Canyon Drive, Suite 110-349, Palm Springs, CA 92264 USA
| | - Jen Adair
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue N, Seattle, WA USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, 825 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Kim Anthony-Gonda
- Caring Cross, 708 Quince Orchard Road, Suite 250D, Gaithersburg, MD USA
| | - Boro Dropulić
- Caring Cross, 708 Quince Orchard Road, Suite 250D, Gaithersburg, MD USA
| | - John A. Sauceda
- Department of Medicine, Division of Prevention Science, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), 550 16th Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
| | - Michael J. Peluso
- Department of Medicine, Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco General Hospital, Ward 84, Building 80, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
| | - Steven G. Deeks
- Department of Medicine, Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco General Hospital, Ward 84, Building 80, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
| | - Jane Simoni
- Departments of Psychology and Global Health, University of Washington, 3909 Stevens Way CE, Box 351525, Seattle, WA USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kanazawa J, Gianella S, Concha-Garcia S, Taylor J, Kaytes A, Christensen C, Patel H, Ndukwe S, Rawlings SA, Hendrickx S, Little S, Brown B, Smith D, Dubé K. Ethical and practical considerations for HIV cure-related research at the end-of-life: a qualitative interview and focus group study in the United States. BMC Med Ethics 2022; 23:2. [PMID: 35012544 PMCID: PMC8748179 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00741-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the next frontiers in HIV research is focused on finding a cure. A new priority includes people with HIV (PWH) with non-AIDS terminal illnesses who are willing to donate their bodies at the end-of-life (EOL) to advance the search towards an HIV cure. We endeavored to understand perceptions of this research and to identify ethical and practical considerations relevant to implementing it. METHODS We conducted 20 in-depth interviews and 3 virtual focus groups among four types of key stakeholders in the United States (PWH, biomedical HIV cure researchers, HIV clinicians, and bioethicists) to obtain triangulated viewpoints because little was known about the ethics of this topic. Each group was queried as to ethical considerations, safeguards, and protections for conducting HIV cure-related research at the EOL to ensure this research remains acceptable. RESULTS All four key stakeholder groups generally supported HIV cure-related research conducted at the EOL because of the history of altruism within the PWH community and the potential for substantial scientific knowledge to be gained. Our informants expressed that: (1) Strong stakeholder and community involvement are integral to the ethical and effective implementation, as well as the social acceptability of this research; (2) PWH approaching the EOL should not inherently be considered a vulnerable class and their autonomy must be respected when choosing to participate in HIV cure-related research at the EOL; (3) Greater diversity among study participants, as well as multi-disciplinary research teams, is necessitated by HIV cure-related research at the EOL; (4) The sensitive nature of this research warrants robust oversight to ensure a favorable risk/benefit balance and to minimize the possibility of therapeutic misconception or undue influence; and (5) Research protocols should remain flexible to accommodate participants' comfort and needs at the EOL. CONCLUSION Because of the ethical issues presented by HIV cure-related research at the EOL, robust ethical safeguards are of utmost importance. The proposed ethical and practical considerations presented herein is a first step in determining the best way to maximize this research's impact and social value. More much inquiry will need to be directed towards understanding context-specific and cultural considerations for implementing EOL HIV cure research in diverse settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Kanazawa
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Sara Gianella
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Susanna Concha-Garcia
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California at San Diego, 220 Dickinson Street, Suite A, San Diego, CA USA
- HIV Neurobehavioral Research Program (HNRP), California NeuroAIDS Tissue Network, University of California San Diego, 220 Dickson Street, Suite B, San Diego, CA USA
| | - Jeff Taylor
- AVRC Community Advisory Board, University of California San Diego, 220 Dickinson Street, Suite A, San Diego, CA USA
- HIV + Aging Research Project – Palm Springs (HARP-PS), 1775 Palm Canyon Drive, Suite 110-349, Palm Springs, CA USA
| | - Andy Kaytes
- AVRC Community Advisory Board, University of California San Diego, 220 Dickinson Street, Suite A, San Diego, CA USA
| | - Christopher Christensen
- HIV + Aging Research Project – Palm Springs (HARP-PS), 1775 Palm Canyon Drive, Suite 110-349, Palm Springs, CA USA
| | - Hursch Patel
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Samuel Ndukwe
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Stephen A. Rawlings
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California at San Diego, 220 Dickinson Street, Suite A, San Diego, CA USA
| | - Steven Hendrickx
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California at San Diego, 220 Dickinson Street, Suite A, San Diego, CA USA
| | - Susan Little
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Brandon Brown
- Department of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, Center for Healthy Communities, University of California, Riverside, 3333 14th Street, Riverside, CA USA
| | - Davey Smith
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California at San Diego, 220 Dickinson Street, Suite A, San Diego, CA USA
| | - Karine Dubé
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Polonijo AN, Dubé K, Galea JT, Greene KY, Taylor J, Christensen C, Brown B. Attitudes Toward Payment for Research Participation: Results from a U.S. Survey of People Living with HIV. AIDS Behav 2022; 26:3267-3278. [PMID: 35386050 PMCID: PMC9474466 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-022-03660-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Little is known about how payment affects individuals' decisions to participate in HIV research. Using data from a U.S. survey of people living with HIV (N = 292), we examined potential research participants' attitudes toward payment, perceived study risk based on payment amount, and preferred payment forms, and how these factors vary by sociodemographic characteristics. Most respondents agreed people should be paid for HIV research participation (96%) and said payment would shape their research participation decisions (80%). Men, less formally educated individuals, and members of some minoritized racial-ethnic groups were less likely to be willing to participate in research without payment. Higher payment was associated with higher perceived study risks, while preferences for form of payment varied by age, gender, education, race-ethnicity, and census region of residence. Findings suggest payment may influence prospective research participants' risk-benefit calculus and participation, and that a one-size-fits-all approach to payment could differentially influence participation among distinct sociodemographic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea N. Polonijo
- grid.266096.d0000 0001 0049 1282Department of Sociology and the Health Sciences Research Institute, University of California, Merced, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, CA 95343 USA
| | - Karine Dubé
- grid.10698.360000000122483208Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Jerome T. Galea
- grid.170693.a0000 0001 2353 285XSchool of Social Work, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL USA ,grid.170693.a0000 0001 2353 285XCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL USA ,grid.38142.3c000000041936754XDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, MA USA
| | - Karah Yeona Greene
- grid.170693.a0000 0001 2353 285XSchool of Social Work, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL USA
| | - Jeff Taylor
- HIV+Aging Research Project–Palm Springs, Palm Springs, CA USA
| | | | - Brandon Brown
- grid.266097.c0000 0001 2222 1582Department of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dubé K, Kanazawa J, Dee L, Taylor J, Sauceda JA, Gianella S, Smith D, Deeks SG, Peluso MJ. Considerations for designing and implementing combination HIV cure trials: findings from a qualitative in-depth interview study in the United States. AIDS Res Ther 2021; 18:75. [PMID: 34663375 PMCID: PMC8522863 DOI: 10.1186/s12981-021-00401-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing number of HIV cure trials involve combining multiple potentially curative interventions. Until now, considerations for designing and implementing complex combination HIV cure trials have not been thoroughly considered. METHODS We used a purposive method to select key informants for our study. Informants included biomedical HIV cure researchers, regulators, policy makers, bioethicists, and community members. We used in-depth interviews to generate ethical and practical considerations to guide the design and implementation of combination HIV cure research. We analyzed the qualitative data using conventional content analysis focused on inductive reasoning. RESULTS We interviewed 11 biomedical researchers, 4 community members, 2 regulators, 1 policy researcher, and 1 bioethicist. Informants generated considerations for designing and implementing combination interventions towards an HIV cure, focused on ethical aspects, as well as considerations to guide trial design, benefit/risk determinations, regulatory requirements, prioritization and sequencing and timing of interventions, among others. Informants also provided considerations related to combining specific HIV cure research modalities, such as broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs), cell and gene modification products, latency-reversing agents and immune-based interventions. Finally, informants provided suggestions to ensure meaningful therapeutic improvements over standard antiretroviral therapy, overcome challenges of designing combination approaches, and engage communities around combination HIV cure research. CONCLUSION The increasing number of combination HIV cure trials brings with them a host of ethical and practical challenges. We hope our paper will inform meaningful stakeholder dialogue around the use of combinatorial HIV cure research approaches. To protect the public trust in HIV cure research, considerations should be periodically revisited and updated with key stakeholder input as the science continues to advance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27516 USA
| | - John Kanazawa
- University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Lynda Dee
- AIDS Action Baltimore, 14 East Eager Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board (CAB), 995 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
| | - Jeff Taylor
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board (CAB), 995 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
- HIV+Aging Research Project-Palm Springs (H+ARP-PS), 1775 East Palm Canyon Drive, Suite 110-349, Palm Springs, CA 92264 USA
| | - John A. Sauceda
- Department of Medicine, Division of Prevention Science, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), 550 16th Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
| | - Sara Gianella
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
| | - Davey Smith
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California at San Diego, 220 Dickinson Street, Suite A, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
| | - Steven G. Deeks
- Department of Medicine, Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), Ward 84, Building 80, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
| | - Michael J. Peluso
- Department of Medicine, Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), Ward 84, Building 80, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kanazawa J, Gianella S, Concha-Garcia S, Taylor J, Kaytes A, Christensen C, Patel H, Ndukwe S, Rawlings S, Hendrickx S, Little S, Brown B, Smith D, Dubé K. Ethical and practical considerations for interventional HIV cure-related research at the end-of-life: A qualitative study with key stakeholders in the United States. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0254148. [PMID: 34270612 PMCID: PMC8284787 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A unique window of opportunity currently exists to generate ethical and practical considerations presented by interventional HIV cure-related research at the end-of-life (EOL). Because participants would enroll in these studies for almost completely altruistic reasons, they are owed the highest ethical standards, safeguards, and protections. This qualitative empirical ethics study sought to identify ethical and practical considerations for interventional HIV cure-related research at the EOL. Methods and findings We conducted 20 in-depth interviews and three virtual focus groups (N = 36) with four key stakeholder groups in the United States: 1) bioethicists, 2) people with HIV, 3) HIV care providers, and 4) HIV cure researchers. This study produced six key themes to guide the ethical implementation of interventional HIV cure-related research at the EOL: 1) all stakeholder groups supported this research conditioned upon a clearly delineated respect for participant contribution and autonomy, participant understanding and comprehension of the risks associated with the specific intervention(s) to be tested, and broad community support for testing of the proposed intervention(s); 2) to ensure acceptable benefit-risk profiles, researchers should focus on limiting the risks of unintended effects and minimizing undue pain and suffering at the EOL; 3) only well-vetted interventions that are supported by solid pre-clinical data should be tested in the EOL translational research model; 4) the informed consent process must be robust and include process consent; 5) research protocols should be flexible and adopt a patient/participant centered approach to minimize burdens and ensure their overall comfort and safety; and 6) a participant’s next-of-kin/loved ones should be a major focus of EOL research but only if the participant consents to such involvement. Conclusions To our knowledge, this empirical ethics study generated the first ethical and practical considerations for interventional HIV cure-related research at the EOL. The ethical complexities of such research must be considered now. We must navigate this ethical conundrum so that we are good stewards of the participants’ extremely altruistic gifts by maximizing the impact and social value of this research. We hope that this study will serve as the foundation for future research and discussion on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Kanazawa
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Sara Gianella
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
| | - Susanna Concha-Garcia
- HIV Neurobehavioral Research Program (HNRP), California NeuroAIDS Tissue Network, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - Jeff Taylor
- AVRC Community Advisory Board, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
- HIV + Aging Research Project–Palm Springs (HARP-PS), Palm Springs, California, United States of America
| | - Andy Kaytes
- AVRC Community Advisory Board, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - Christopher Christensen
- HIV + Aging Research Project–Palm Springs (HARP-PS), Palm Springs, California, United States of America
| | - Hursch Patel
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Samuel Ndukwe
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Stephen Rawlings
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - Steven Hendrickx
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - Susan Little
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
| | - Brandon Brown
- Department of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, Center for Healthy Communities, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America
| | - Davey Smith
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - Karine Dubé
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dubé K, Kanazawa J, Taylor J, Dee L, Jones N, Roebuck C, Sylla L, Louella M, Kosmyna J, Kelly D, Clanton O, Palm D, Campbell DM, Onaiwu MG, Patel H, Ndukwe S, Henley L, Johnson MO, Saberi P, Brown B, Sauceda JA, Sugarman J. Ethics of HIV cure research: an unfinished agenda. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:83. [PMID: 34193141 PMCID: PMC8243312 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00651-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The pursuit of a cure for HIV is a high priority for researchers, funding agencies, governments and people living with HIV (PLWH). To date, over 250 biomedical studies worldwide are or have been related to discovering a safe, effective, and scalable HIV cure, most of which are early translational research and experimental medicine. As HIV cure research increases, it is critical to identify and address the ethical challenges posed by this research. Methods We conducted a scoping review of the growing HIV cure research ethics literature, focusing on articles published in English peer-reviewed journals from 2013 to 2021. We extracted and summarized key developments in the ethics of HIV cure research. Twelve community advocates actively engaged in HIV cure research provided input on this summary and suggested areas warranting further ethical inquiry and foresight via email exchange and video conferencing. Discussion Despite substantial scholarship related to the ethics of HIV cure research, additional attention should focus on emerging issues in six categories of ethical issues: (1) social value (ongoing and emerging biomedical research and scalability considerations); (2) scientific validity (study design issues, such as the use of analytical treatment interruptions and placebos); (3) fair selection of participants (equity and justice considerations); (4) favorable benefit/risk balance (early phase research, benefit-risk balance, risk perception, psychological risks, and pediatric research); (5) informed consent (attention to language, decision-making, informed consent processes and scientific uncertainty); and (6) respect for enrolled participants and community (perspectives of people living with HIV and affected communities and representation). Conclusion HIV cure research ethics has an unfinished agenda. Scientific research and bioethics should work in tandem to advance ethical HIV cure research. Because the science of HIV cure research will continue to rapidly advance, ethical considerations of the major themes we identified will need to be revisited and refined over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7469, USA.
| | - John Kanazawa
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7469, USA
| | - Jeff Taylor
- HIV + Aging Research Project - Palm Springs (HARP-PS), Palm Springs, CA, USA.,AntiViral Research Center (AVRC) Community Advisory Board (CAB), San Diego, CA, USA.,Collaboratory of AIDS Researchers for Eradication (CARE) CAB, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lynda Dee
- AIDS Action Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board (CAB), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nora Jones
- BEAT-HIV Collaboratory CAB, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jan Kosmyna
- AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Community Scientific Subcommittee (CSS) Ethics Working Group, Nationwide, USA
| | - David Kelly
- AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Community Scientific Subcommittee (CSS) Ethics Working Group, Nationwide, USA
| | - Orbit Clanton
- AIDS Clinical Trials Group Global CAB, Washington, D.C., USA
| | - David Palm
- Collaboratory of AIDS Researchers for Eradication (CARE) CAB, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases HIV Treatment and Prevention CAB, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Danielle M Campbell
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board (CAB), San Francisco, CA, USA.,Charles R. Drew College of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Morénike Giwa Onaiwu
- AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Community Scientific Subcommittee (CSS) Ethics Working Group, Nationwide, USA.,Center for the Study of Women, Gender, and Sexuality (School of Humanities), Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hursch Patel
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7469, USA
| | - Samuel Ndukwe
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7469, USA
| | - Laney Henley
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7469, USA
| | - Mallory O Johnson
- Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), Division of Prevention Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Parya Saberi
- Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), Division of Prevention Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Brandon Brown
- Department of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, Center for Healthy Communities, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - John A Sauceda
- Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), Division of Prevention Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Diepstra KL, Barr L, Palm D, Hogg E, Mollan KR, Henley L, Stover AM, Simoni JM, Sugarman J, Brown B, Sauceda JA, Deeks S, Fox L, Gandhi RT, Smith D, Li JZ, Dubé K. Participant Perspectives and Experiences Entering an Intensively Monitored Antiretroviral Pause: Results from the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5345 Biomarker Study. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2021; 37:489-501. [PMID: 33472545 DOI: 10.1089/aid.2020.0222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5345 study included an intensively monitored antiretroviral pause (IMAP), during which a cohort of participants temporarily stopped antiretroviral treatment during chronic HIV infection. We surveyed participant perceptions and understanding of A5345 using a cross-sectional sociobehavioral questionnaire. Participants completed the baseline questionnaire either before or after initiating the study's IMAP. Questionnaire responses were linked to existing demographic data. Quantitative responses were analyzed overall and stratified by IMAP status. Open-ended responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Thirty-two participants completed the baseline sociobehavioral questionnaire. Half (n = 16) completed it before (i.e., pre-IMAP initiation group) and half (n = 16) after IMAP initiation (i.e., post-IMAP initiation group). Eight pre-IMAP initiation respondents (50%) and 11 post-IMAP respondents (69%) responded "yes" when asked if they perceived any direct benefits from participating in A5345. Perceived societal-level benefits included furthering HIV cure-related research and helping the HIV community. Perceived personal-level benefits included the opportunity to learn about the body's response to IMAP and financial compensation. The majority of respondents-13 from each group (81% of each)-reported risks from participation, for example, viral load becoming detectable. A5345 participants perceived both societal- and personal-level benefits of study participation. While the majority of survey respondents perceived participatory risks, nearly one in five did not. Key messages pertaining to study-related risks and benefits may need to be clarified or reiterated periodically throughout follow-up in HIV cure-related studies with IMAPs. Clinical Trail Registration Number: NCT03001128.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen L. Diepstra
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Liz Barr
- AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Community Scientific Sub-Committee, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - David Palm
- Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases (IGHID), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Evelyn Hogg
- Social & Scientific Systems, a DLH Company, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Katie R. Mollan
- Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laney Henley
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Angela M. Stover
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jane M. Simoni
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Global Health and Gender, Women, and Sexuality Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Brandon Brown
- Department of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, Center for Healthy Communities, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California, USA
| | - John A. Sauceda
- Division of Prevention Sciences, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Steven Deeks
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lawrence Fox
- National Institute of Health (NIH) Division of AIDS (DAIDS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Davey Smith
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Z. Li
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Karine Dubé
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
De Scheerder MA, van Bilsen WPH, Dullaers M, Martinez-Picado J, Davidovich U, Vandekerckhove L. Motivations, barriers and experiences of participants in an HIV reservoir trial. J Virus Erad 2021; 7:100029. [PMID: 33598311 PMCID: PMC7868726 DOI: 10.1016/j.jve.2021.100029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives We aimed to investigate the motives, barriers and experiences of HIV-STAR study participants. The HIV-STAR study was an analytical HIV treatment interruption trial (ATI) aiming to evaluate the origin of viral rebound, conducted in Ghent, Belgium. Methods A mixed-method study was performed among 11 participants of the HIV-STAR study. Two self-administered questionnaires with 32 and 23 items, respectively, assessed motives, barriers and experiences of the research participants. In-depth interviews were conducted to further explore and understand topics that had emerged from these surveys. Results Motives of ATI study participants were primarily related to the improvement of their own health perspectives and to their contribution to find an HIV cure. Barriers for ATI participation mostly related to practical issues, such as difficulty in planning study visits. Ten out of 11 participants reported a very high overall satisfaction and were willing to participate in another ATI. This satisfaction was predominantly linked to clear communication and guidance. Invasive sampling during the ATI was less of a burden than anticipated by participants. However, most participants underestimated the emotional impact of HIV treatment interruption, which was associated with feelings of uncertainty and loss of control. Risk of HIV transmission because of viral rebound was also mentioned as burdensome during this phase. Conclusions Involvement in an ATI was positively evaluated by HIV-STAR participants. Contributing to HIV cure research outweighed the burden of study participation for most participants. The latter aspects were attenuated by mutual decision making and the experience of empathy from the research team. Still, issues regarding privacy and the psychosocial impact of treatment interruption, including sexuality and HIV transmissibility, should be addressed in a better way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ward P H van Bilsen
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Javier Martinez-Picado
- IRSICaixa AIDS Research Institute, Badalona, Spain.,University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Vic, Spain.,Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Udi Davidovich
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Linos Vandekerckhove
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sauceda JA, Dubé K, Brown B, Pérez AE, Rivas CE, Evans D, Fisher CB. Framing a Consent Form to Improve Consent Understanding and Determine How This Affects Willingness to Participate in HIV Cure Research: An Experimental Survey Study. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2020; 16:78-87. [PMID: 33307932 DOI: 10.1177/1556264620981205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
HIV cure research carries serious risks and negligible benefits. We investigated how participants understand these risks and what influences their willingness to participate. Through internet-based and in-person convenience sampling, 86 HIV+ participants completed an experimental survey. Participants were randomized to read a standard consent form describing a hypothetical HIV cure study or one adapted using Fuzzy Trace Theory-a decision-making model to facilitate complex information processing. We measured consent understanding and cognitive (e.g., safe/harmful) and affective (e.g., concerning, satisfying) evaluations of HIV cure research. Participants who read the adapted consent form had improved consent understanding, but only positive affective evaluations were associated with a willingness to participate. Consent processes can use decision-making theories to facilitate comprehension of study information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karine Dubé
- 2331University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, USA
| | | | | | | | - David Evans
- 455669Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise Martin Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dubé K, Campbell DM, Perry KE, Kanazawa JT, Saberi P, Sauceda JA, Poteat T, Evans D. Reasons People Living with HIV Might Prefer Oral Daily Antiretroviral Therapy, Long-Acting Formulations, or Future HIV Remission Options. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2020; 36:1054-1058. [PMID: 32829645 DOI: 10.1089/aid.2020.0107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
A growing body of research is beginning to elucidate reasons people living with HIV (PLWHIV) might prefer oral daily antiretroviral treatment (ART) compared with emerging long-acting ART (LA-ART) or HIV remission strategies under investigation. Our objective is to provide qualitative insights into the reasons why PLWHIV might prefer one of these HIV control therapies over others. From May to August 2018, we implemented a semistructured cross-sectional survey of PLWHIV in the United States to better understand patient preferences around various HIV treatment and remission options. Using free text, respondents were asked to explain why they preferred one HIV control option over the other two. We analyzed responses to the open-ended survey questions on reasons for preferring oral daily ART versus LA-ART versus HIV remission strategies using conventional content analysis. The results showed that PLWHIV preferred oral daily ART because of its familiarity and known safety and efficacy profile, whereas those who preferred LA-ART would value the convenience it offers. Finally, HIV remission strategies would be preferred to avoid taking ART altogether. The qualitative results provide insights into reasons why PLWHIV in the United States might prefer oral daily ART versus novel therapies. More importantly, they provide information to better align HIV virological control strategies with end-user perspectives. To make informed choices around evolving HIV therapeutics, PLWHIV and HIV care providers would benefit from decision tools to better assess options and trade-offs. More research is needed on how best to effectively support PLWHIV and HIV care providers in shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Danielle M. Campbell
- Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kelly E. Perry
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - John T. Kanazawa
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Parya Saberi
- Division of Prevention Sciences, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA
| | - John A. Sauceda
- Division of Prevention Sciences, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Tonia Poteat
- Department of Social Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - David Evans
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lau JS, Smith MZ, Allan B, Dubé K, Young AT, Power J. Time for revolution? Enhancing meaningful involvement of people living with HIV and affected communities in HIV cure-focused science. J Virus Erad 2020; 6:100018. [PMID: 33251026 PMCID: PMC7646668 DOI: 10.1016/j.jve.2020.100018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Involving affected communities and people living with HIV (PLHIV) in HIV cure-focused clinical trials has ethical and practical benefits. However, there can be barriers to meaningful involvement of 'lay people' in scientific research meaning community consultation is often limited or tokenistic. This paper reports on an Australian project, the INSPIRE project (Improve, Nurture and Strengthen education, collaboration, and communication between PLHIV and Researchers), which aimed to explore barriers and enablers to enactment of the principles of meaningful involvement of PLHIV (MIPA) and affected communities in HIV cure-focused research. METHODS The project involved a workshop attended by 40 stakeholders involved in HIV care, research or advocacy including PLHIV, community organizations, basic scientists, and clinicians. The workshop involved a facilitated discussion about community involvement in a hypothetical HIV cure-focused clinical trial. Data were collected through notetaking and video recordings. Qualitative, thematic analysis was undertaken to organize the data and identify core themes related to MIPA. RESULTS Workshop discussions revealed community stakeholders often feel their involvement in HIV clinical research is undervalued, evidenced by limited financial remuneration and minimal capacity to influence the research design or processes. Building long-term, formal and informal relationships between community organizations, PLHIV, researchers and research teams or laboratories was identified as a strategy to support MIPA at all stages of a clinical trial, from design to dissemination of findings. CONCLUSIONS Enacting MIPA principles in HIV cure-focused research requires a better understanding of the potential to improve research outcomes and ensure quality in the research process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miranda Z. Smith
- Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Brent Allan
- International Council of AIDS Service Organizations, Toronto, Canada
| | - Karine Dubé
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - A. Toni Young
- District of Columbia Centre for AIDS Research, Community Education Group, Washington D.C., USA
| | - Jennifer Power
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dubé K, Perry KE, Mathur K, Lo M, Javadi SS, Patel H, Concha-Garcia S, Taylor J, Kaytes A, Dee L, Campbell D, Kanazawa J, Smith D, Gianella S, Auerbach JD, Saberi P, Sauceda JA. Altruism: Scoping review of the literature and future directions for HIV cure-related research. J Virus Erad 2020; 6:100008. [PMID: 33294210 PMCID: PMC7695811 DOI: 10.1016/j.jve.2020.100008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The question of what motivates people to participate in research is particularly salient in the HIV field. While participation in HIV research was driven by survival in the 1980's and early 1990's, access to novel therapies became the primary motivator with the advent of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in the late 1990s. In the HIV cure-related research context, the concept of altruism has remained insufficiently studied. METHODS We conducted a scoping review to better contextualize and understand how altruism is or could be operationalized in HIV cure-related research. We drew from the fields of altruism in general, clinical research, cancer, and HIV clinical research-including the HIV prevention, treatment, and cure-related research fields. DISCUSSION Altruism as a key motivating factor for participation in clinical research has often been intertwined with the desire for personal benefit. The cancer field informs us that reasons for participation usually are multi-faceted and complex. The HIV prevention field offers ways to organize altruism-either by the types of benefits achieved (e.g., societal versus personal), or the origin of the values that motivate research participation. The HIV treatment literature reveals the critical role of clinical interactions in fostering altruism. There remains a dearth of in-depth knowledge regarding reasons surrounding research participation and the types of altruism displayed in HIV cure-related clinical research. CONCLUSION Lessons learned from various research fields can guide questions which will inform the assessment of altruism in future HIV cure-related research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kelly E. Perry
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kushagra Mathur
- University of California San Diego (UCSD) School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Megan Lo
- University of California San Diego (UCSD) School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sogol S. Javadi
- University of California San Diego (UCSD) School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Hursch Patel
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Susanna Concha-Garcia
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), USA, San Diego, CA, USA
- HIV Neurobehavioral Research Program, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Jeff Taylor
- AVRC Community Advisory Board (CAB), San Diego, CA, USA
- amfAR Institute for HIV Cure Research CAB, San Francisco, CA, USA
- HIV + Aging Research Project – Palm Springs (HARP – PS), Palm Springs, CA, USA
| | - Andy Kaytes
- AVRC Community Advisory Board (CAB), San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Lynda Dee
- amfAR Institute for HIV Cure Research CAB, San Francisco, CA, USA
- AIDS Action Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, CA, USA
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE), CAB, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Danielle Campbell
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE), CAB, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John Kanazawa
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - David Smith
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), USA, San Diego, CA, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sara Gianella
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), USA, San Diego, CA, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Judith D. Auerbach
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Parya Saberi
- Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), Division of Prevention Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John A. Sauceda
- Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), Division of Prevention Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Saberi P, Eskaf S, Sauceda J, Evans D, Dubé K. Perceptions of HIV Virologic Control Strategies Among Younger and Older Age Groups of People Living with HIV in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Survey. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2020; 36:606-615. [PMID: 32368934 DOI: 10.1089/aid.2020.0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Two HIV virologic control advances are in various stages of development, including long-acting antiretroviral therapy (ART) formulations and strategies aimed at sustained ART-free HIV control. Perceptions of risks and benefits toward HIV virologic control strategies may be different based on an individual's age due to differing experiences of the impacts of the domestic HIV epidemic, altruistic attitudes toward research participation, and general levels of engagement in health care. We examined preferences of HIV virologic control strategies by age groups. In 2018, we conducted a nationwide, online cross-sectional survey to examine differences in HIV virologic control strategies among a sample of people living with HIV who were <50 and ≥50 years of age. From a total of 281 participants, 3 findings were noteworthy: (1) Participants <50 years of age were more likely to be demotivated by perceived social risks (e.g., stigma, discrimination, HIV disclosure, and fear of transmitting HIV during a treatment interruption), compared with those ≥50 years; (2) participants ≥50 years of age were more motivated by altruistic notions compared with those <50 years; and (3) we noted greater desirability of longer long-acting ART and new HIV cure-related strategies among participants <50 years versus those ≥50 years. Our analysis provides a deeper understanding of differences in perceptions among various age groups regarding desirable future ART characteristics, and motivations and barriers to participating in HIV cure-related strategies. Our findings can help inform community engagement and education, and assist researchers in tailoring study design and recruitment efforts to major age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parya Saberi
- Division of Prevention Sciences, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Shadi Eskaf
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, UNC School of Government, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - John Sauceda
- Division of Prevention Sciences, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - David Evans
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Karine Dubé
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dubé K, Dee L. Willingness to risk death endpoint in HIV cure-related research with otherwise healthy volunteers is misleading. J Virus Erad 2020; 6:81-84. [PMID: 32405426 PMCID: PMC7213068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
This viewpoint article critiques two recent articles examining 'willingness to risk death' to advance HIV cure-related research. The 'willingness to risk death' endpoint sends the wrong signal to the HIV cure-related research community about ongoing research in otherwise healthy volunteers living with HIV. Socio-behavioural scientists have examined the acceptability of a 99% risk of death scenario, which is unrealistic and would not be acceptable by current regulatory and ethical standards. We believe that the field needs robust and relevant socio-behavioural research reflecting ongoing biomedical HIV cure-related trials. These studies will need to withstand regulatory and ethical scrutiny if cure or remission regimens are to proceed to the licensing stage. The HIV cure-related research community must continue to protect the public trust in the HIV cure-related research field and sustain societal value generated by such research. We call for the utmost prudence in designing biomedical HIV cure trials as well as in setting up socio-behavioural research experiments related to these complex trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- Public Health Leadership Program,
UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health,
Chapel Hill,
NC,
USA
| | - Lynda Dee
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise Community Advisory Board (CAB),
Baltimore,
MD,
USA
- amfAR Institute for HIV Cure Research CAB,
Baltimore,
MD,
USA
- AIDS Action Baltimore,
MD,
USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kratka A, Ubel PA, Scherr K, Murray B, Eyal N, Kirby C, Katz MN, Holtzman L, Pollak K, Freedburg K, Blumenthal-Barby J. HIV Cure Research: Risks Patients Expressed Willingness to Accept. Ethics Hum Res 2020; 41:23-34. [PMID: 31743627 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Despite doing well on antiretroviral therapy, many people living with HIV have expressed a willingness to accept substantial risks for an HIV cure. To date, few studies have assessed the specific quantitative maximal risk that future participants might take; probed whether, according to future participants, the risk can be offset by the benefits; and examined whether taking substantial risk is a reasonable decision. In this qualitative study, we interviewed 22 people living with HIV and used standard gamble methodology to assess the maximum chance of death a person would risk for an HIV cure. We probed participants' reasoning behind their risk-taking responses. Conventional inductive content analysis was used to categorize key themes regarding decision-making. We found that some people would be willing to risk even death for an HIV cure, and some of their reasons were plausible and went far beyond the health-related utility of an HIV cure. We contend that people's expressed willingness to take substantial risk for an HIV cure should not be dismissed out of hand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Kratka
- Internal medicine resident at Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | - Peter A Ubel
- Professor in the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University
| | | | | | - Nir Eyal
- Directs the Center for Population-Level Bioethics at Rutgers University
| | - Christine Kirby
- Program coordinator in the Center for Health Equity Research at Northern Arizona University
| | - Madelaine N Katz
- MPH candidate at the Gillings School of Global Public Health at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Lisa Holtzman
- Program manager in the Department of Global Health and Population at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health
| | - Kathryn Pollak
- Professor in Population Health Sciences and is the associate director of population sciences in the Duke Cancer Institute at Duke University
| | - Kenneth Freedburg
- Director of the Medical Practice Evaluation Center and is a professor of medicine in the Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
| | - Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby
- Associate director and Cullen associate professor in the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dubé K, Eskaf S, Evans D, Sauceda J, Saberi P, Brown B, Averitt D, Martel K, Meija M, Campbell D, Barr L, Kanazawa J, Perry K, Patel H, Luter S, Poteat T, Auerbach JD, Wohl DA. The Dose Response: Perceptions of People Living with HIV in the United States on Alternatives to Oral Daily Antiretroviral Therapy. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2020; 36:324-348. [PMID: 31608651 PMCID: PMC7185332 DOI: 10.1089/aid.2019.0175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
There are two concurrent and novel major research pathways toward strategies for HIV control: (1) long-acting antiretroviral therapy (ART) formulations and (2) research aimed at conferring sustained ART-free HIV remission, considered a step toward an HIV cure. The importance of perspectives from people living with HIV on the development of new modalities is high, but data are lacking. We administered an online survey in which respondents selected their likelihood of participation or nonparticipation in HIV cure/remission research based on potential risks and perceived benefits of these new modalities. We also tested the correlation between perceptions of potential risks and benefits with preferences of virologic control strategies and/or responses to scenario choices, while controlling for respondent characteristics. Of the 282 eligible respondents, 42% would be willing to switch from oral daily ART to long-acting ART injectables or implantables taken at 6-month intervals, and 24% to a hypothetical ART-free remission strategy. We found statistically significant gender differences in perceptions of risk and preferences of HIV control strategies, and possible psychosocial factors that could mediate willingness to switch to novel HIV treatment or remission options. Our study yielded data on possible desirable product characteristics for future HIV treatment and remission options. Findings also revealed differences in motivations and preferences across gender and other sociodemographic characteristics that may be actionable as part of research recruitment efforts. The diversity of participant perspectives reveals the need to provide a variety of therapeutic options to people living with HIV and to acknowledge their diverse experiential expertise when developing novel HIV therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- Public Health Leadership Program (PHLP), UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Women's Research Initiative on HIV/AIDS (WRI), Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Shadi Eskaf
- Environmental Finance Center, UNC School of Government, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - David Evans
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board, Los Angeles, California
| | - John Sauceda
- Division of Prevention Sciences, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Parya Saberi
- Division of Prevention Sciences, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Brandon Brown
- Department of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, Center for Healthy Communities, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California
| | - Dawn Averitt
- Women's Research Initiative on HIV/AIDS (WRI), Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- The Well Project, Norwich, Vermont
| | - Krista Martel
- Women's Research Initiative on HIV/AIDS (WRI), Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- The Well Project, Norwich, Vermont
| | - Maria Meija
- The Well Project Community Advisory Board, Tamarac, Florida
| | - Danielle Campbell
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board, Los Angeles, California
| | - Liz Barr
- AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Community Scientific Subcommittee Representative, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - John Kanazawa
- Public Health Leadership Program (PHLP), UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kelly Perry
- Public Health Leadership Program (PHLP), UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Hursch Patel
- Public Health Leadership Program (PHLP), UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Stuart Luter
- Public Health Leadership Program (PHLP), UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Tonia Poteat
- Women's Research Initiative on HIV/AIDS (WRI), Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- UNC Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Judith D. Auerbach
- Women's Research Initiative on HIV/AIDS (WRI), Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- The Well Project, Norwich, Vermont
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - David A. Wohl
- Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases (IGHID), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dubé K, Hosey L, Starr K, Barr L, Evans D, Hoffman E, Campbell DM, Simoni J, Sugarman J, Sauceda J, Brown B, Diepstra KL, Godfrey C, Kuritzkes DR, Wohl DA, Gandhi R, Scully E. Participant Perspectives in an HIV Cure-Related Trial Conducted Exclusively in Women in the United States: Results from AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5366. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2020; 36:268-282. [PMID: 32160755 DOI: 10.1089/aid.2019.0284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Women remain underrepresented in HIV research. The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 5366 study was the first HIV cure-related trial conducted exclusively in women. Our multidisciplinary team integrated participant-centered reports into the ACTG 5366 protocol to elicit their perspectives. We nested mixed-methods surveys at the enrollment and final study visits to assess ACTG 5366 participants' perceptions and experiences. Of 31 participants enrolled in the ACTG 5366, 29 study agreed to complete the entry questionnaire and 27 completed the exit survey. The majority of study participants were nonwhite. We identified societal and personal motivators for participation, understanding of risks and benefits, and minor misconceptions among some trial participants. Stigma was pervasive for several women who joined the study, and served as a motivator for study participation. Reimbursements to defray costs of study participation were reported to facilitate involvement in the trial by about one-third of participants. Almost all respondents reported positive experiences participating in the ACTG 5366 trial. The ACTG 5366 study showed that it is possible to recruit and retain women in HIV cure-related research and to embed participant-centered outcomes at strategic time points during the study. The findings could help in the design, implementation, recruitment, and retention of women in HIV cure-related research and highlight the value of assessing psychosocial factors in HIV cure-related research participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Lara Hosey
- Social and Scientific Systems (S-3), Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Kate Starr
- ACTG Community Scientific Sub-Committee, Columbus, Ohio and Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Liz Barr
- ACTG Community Scientific Sub-Committee, Columbus, Ohio and Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Gender, Women's and Sexuality Studies, University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC), Baltimore, Maryland
| | - David Evans
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board (CAB), New York City, New York
| | - Erin Hoffman
- Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases (IGHID), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Jane Simoni
- Department of Global Health and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - John Sauceda
- Division of Prevention Sciences, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Brandon Brown
- Department of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, Center for Healthy Communities, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California
| | - Karen L. Diepstra
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Catherine Godfrey
- HIV Research Branch, National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - David A. Wohl
- Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases (IGHID), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Rajesh Gandhi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eileen Scully
- John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dubé K, Auerbach JD, Stirratt MJ, Gaist P. Applying the Behavioural and Social Sciences Research (BSSR) Functional Framework to HIV Cure Research. J Int AIDS Soc 2019; 22:e25404. [PMID: 31665568 PMCID: PMC6820877 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The search for an HIV cure involves important behavioural and social processes that complement the domains of biomedicine. However, the field has yet to tap into the full potential of behavioural and social sciences research (BSSR). In this article, we apply Gaist and Stirratt's BSSR Functional Framework to the field of HIV cure research. DISCUSSION The BSSR Functional Framework describes four key research domains: (1) basic BSSR (understanding basic behavioural and social factors), (2) elemental BSSR (advancing behavioural and social interventions), (3) supportive BSSR (strengthening biomedically focused clinical trials), and (4) integrative BSSR (building multi-disciplinary combination approaches for real-world implementation). In revisiting and applying the BSSR Functional Framework, we clarify the importance of BSSR in HIV cure research by drawing attention to such things as: how language and communication affect the meaning of "cure" to people living with HIV (PLHIV) and broader communities; how cure affects the identity and social position of PLHIV; counselling and support interventions to address the psychosocial needs and concerns of study participants related to analytical treatment interruptions (ATIs); risk reduction in the course of ATI study participation; motivation, acceptability, and decision-making processes of potential study participants related to different cure strategies; HIV care providers' perceptions and attitudes about their patients' participation in cure research; potential social harms or adverse social events associated with cure research participation; and the scalability of a proven cure strategy in the context of further advances in HIV prevention and treatment. We also discuss the BSSR Functional Framework in the context of ATIs, which involve processes at the confluence of the BSSR domains. CONCLUSIONS To move HIV cure regimens through the translational research pathway, attention will need to be paid to both biomedical and socio-behavioural elements. BSSR can contribute an improved understanding of the human and social dimensions related to HIV cure research and the eventual application of HIV cure regimens. The BSSR Functional Framework provides a way to identify advances, gaps and opportunities to craft an integrated, multi-disciplinary approach at all stages of cure research to ensure the real-world applicability of any strategy that shows promise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Judith D Auerbach
- School of MedicineUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Michael J Stirratt
- Division of AIDS Research (DAR)National Institute of Mental HealthNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMDUSA
| | - Paul Gaist
- Office of AIDS ResearchDivision of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic InitiativesOffice of the DirectorNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMDUSA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Dubé K, Simoni J, Louella M, Sylla L, Mohamed ZH, Patel H, Luter S, Collier AC. Acceptability of Cell and Gene Therapy for Curing HIV Infection Among People Living with HIV in the Northwestern United States: A Qualitative Study. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2019; 35:649-659. [PMID: 30990052 PMCID: PMC6602097 DOI: 10.1089/aid.2019.0021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple strategies to cure HIV infection are under investigation, including cell and gene therapy (C>) approaches. Research, and ultimately treatment, with these novel strategies will require patients' willingness to participate. To elicit the perspectives of people living with HIV specific to these novel approaches, we conducted 4 focus group discussions with a diverse group of 19 English-speaking men and women living with HIV in care at a large academic HIV clinic in the northwestern United States. Thematic analysis indicated participants expressed initial fear about C> research. They articulated specific concerns about risks, including analytical treatment interruptions, and thought only a person in desperate straits would participate. They voiced significant mistrust of research in general and believed there was already a cure from HIV that was being withheld from the poor. Overall, they were satisfied with their health and quality of life on antiretroviral therapy. These findings suggest the importance of community engagement and educational efforts about C> for HIV cure to ensure optimal collaborative partnerships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jane Simoni
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Michael Louella
- defeatHIV Community Advisory Board (CAB), Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Laurie Sylla
- defeatHIV Community Advisory Board (CAB), Seattle, Washington
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Zahra H. Mohamed
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Hursch Patel
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Stuart Luter
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ann C. Collier
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Moodley K, Staunton C, Rossouw T, de Roubaix M, Duby Z, Skinner D. The psychology of "cure" - unique challenges to consent processes in HIV cure research in South Africa. BMC Med Ethics 2019; 20:9. [PMID: 30678664 PMCID: PMC6346569 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-019-0348-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consent processes for clinical trials involving HIV prevention research have generated considerable debate globally over the past three decades. HIV cure/eradication research is scientifically more complex and consequently, consent processes for clinical trials in this field are likely to pose a significant challenge. Given that research efforts are now moving toward HIV eradication, stakeholder engagement to inform appropriate ethics oversight of such research is timely. This study sought to establish the perspectives of a wide range of stakeholders in HIV treatment and research to inform consent processes for cure research. METHODS In total, 68 South African stakeholders participated in two qualitative research modalities. In-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with a purposive sample of 42 individuals - audiotaped with consent. Twenty-six stakeholders participated in three focus group discussions (FGDs). Thematic analysis of transcribed IDIs and FGDs was conducted. RESULTS The majority of respondents indicated that there could be unique challenges in HIV cure research requiring special attention. In particular, given the complexity of cure science, translation of concepts into lay language would be critical for potential participants to adequately appreciate risks and benefits in early phase research with experimental interventions. Furthermore, to aid understanding of risks and benefits against a background of desperation for a cure, specially trained facilitators would be required to assist with a psychological assessment prior to consent to avoid curative misconceptions. Long-term participant engagement to assess durability of a cure would mean that the consent process would be prolonged, necessitating annual re-consent. Building trust to maintain such long-term relationships would be critical to retain study participants. CONCLUSION Unique consent requirements for cure research in South Africa would include significant efforts to maximise understanding of trial procedures, risks and the need for long-term follow-up. However, the psychological dimension of cure must not be underestimated. Beyond an understanding of cure science, the emotional impact of HIV cure advances the discourse from cure to healing. Consequently, the consent process for cure research would need to be enhanced to include psychological support and counselling. This has several important implications for research ethics review requirements for consent in HIV cure research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keymanthri Moodley
- Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Ciara Staunton
- Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Theresa Rossouw
- Institute for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Department of Immunology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Malcolm de Roubaix
- Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Zoe Duby
- Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Donald Skinner
- HIV AIDS STDs and TB, Human Sciences Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
- Dept. of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dubé K, Gianella S, Concha-Garcia S, Little SJ, Kaytes A, Taylor J, Mathur K, Javadi S, Nathan A, Patel H, Luter S, Philpott-Jones S, Brown B, Smith D. Ethical considerations for HIV cure-related research at the end of life. BMC Med Ethics 2018; 19:83. [PMID: 30342507 PMCID: PMC6196016 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-018-0321-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The U.S. National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) have a new research priority: inclusion of terminally ill persons living with HIV (PLWHIV) in HIV cure-related research. For example, the Last Gift is a clinical research study at the University of California San Diego (UCSD) for PLWHIV who have a terminal illness, with a prognosis of less than 6 months. Discussion As end-of-life (EOL) HIV cure research is relatively new, the scientific community has a timely opportunity to examine the related ethical challenges. Following an extensive review of the EOL and HIV cure research ethics literature, combined with deliberation from various stakeholders (biomedical researchers, PLWHIV, bioethicists, and socio-behavioral scientists) and our experience with the Last Gift study to date, we outline considerations to ensure that such research with terminally ill PLWHIV remains ethical, focusing on five topics: 1) protecting autonomy through informed consent, 2) avoiding exploitation and fostering altruism, 3) maintaining a favorable benefits/risks balance, 4) safeguarding against vulnerability through patient-participant centeredness, and 5) ensuring the acceptance of next-of-kin/loved ones and community stakeholders. Conclusion EOL HIV cure-related research can be performed ethically and effectively by anticipating key issues that may arise. While not unique to the fields of EOL or HIV cure-related research, the considerations highlighted can help us support a new research approach. We must honor the lives of PLWHIV whose involvement in research can provide the knowledge needed to achieve the dream of making HIV infection curable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Sara Gianella
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, Stein Clinical Research Building, La Jolla, California, USA.,AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California San Diego, 220 Dickinson Street, Suite A, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Susan Concha-Garcia
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, Stein Clinical Research Building, La Jolla, California, USA.,AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California San Diego, 220 Dickinson Street, Suite A, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Susan J Little
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, Stein Clinical Research Building, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Andy Kaytes
- AVRC Community Advisory Board, University of California San Diego, 220 Dickinson Street, Suite A, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jeff Taylor
- AVRC Community Advisory Board, University of California San Diego, 220 Dickinson Street, Suite A, San Diego, California, USA.,HIV and Aging Research Project - Palm Springs (HARP-PS), 1775 East Palm Canyon Drive, Suite 110-349, Palm Springs, California, USA
| | - Kushagra Mathur
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California San Diego, 220 Dickinson Street, Suite A, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Sogol Javadi
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California San Diego, 220 Dickinson Street, Suite A, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Anshula Nathan
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hursch Patel
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stuart Luter
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sean Philpott-Jones
- Department of Bioethics, Clarkson University, 80 Nott Terrace, Schenectady, New York, USA
| | - Brandon Brown
- Center for Healthy Communities, Department of Social Medicine, Population, and Public Health, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, 3333 14th Street, Riverside, California, USA
| | - Davey Smith
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, Stein Clinical Research Building, La Jolla, California, USA.,AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California San Diego, 220 Dickinson Street, Suite A, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Power J, Westle A, Dowsett GW, Lucke J, Tucker JD, Sugarman J, Lewin SR, Hill S, Brown G, Wallace J, Richmond J. Perceptions of HIV cure research among people living with HIV in Australia. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0202647. [PMID: 30142171 PMCID: PMC6108463 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2017] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Participation in HIV cure-related clinical trials that involve antiretroviral treatment (ART) interruption may pose substantial individual risks for people living with HIV (PLHIV) without any therapeutic benefit. As such, it is important that the views of PLHIV are considered in the design of HIV cure research trials. Examining the lived experience of PLHIV provides unique and valuable perspectives on the risks and benefits of HIV cure research. In this study, we interviewed 20 PLHIV in Australia about their knowledge and attitudes toward clinical HIV cure research and explored their views regarding participation in HIV cure clinical trials, including those that involve ART interruption. Data were analysed thematically, using both inductive and deductive coding techniques, to identity themes related to perceptions of HIV cure research and PLHIV's assessment of the possible risks and benefits of trial participation. Study findings revealed interviewees were willing to consider participation in HIV cure research for social reasons, most notably the opportunity to help others. Concerns raised about ART interruption related to the social and emotional impact of viral rebound, including fear of onward HIV transmission and anxiety about losing control. These findings reveal the ways in which PLHIV perspectives deepen our understanding of HIV cure research, moving beyond a purely clinical assessment of risks and benefits in order to consider the social context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Power
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Andrew Westle
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gary W. Dowsett
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Social Research in Health, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jayne Lucke
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Joseph D. Tucker
- UNC Project-China, University of North Carolina, Guangzhou, China
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Sharon R. Lewin
- The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sophie Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Graham Brown
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Social Research in Health, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jack Wallace
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jacqui Richmond
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dubé K, Sylla L, Dee L, Taylor J, Evans D, Bruton CD, Gilberston A, Gralinski L, Brown B, Skinner A, Weiner BJ, Greene SB, Corneli A, Adimora AA, Tucker JD, Rennie S. Research on HIV cure: Mapping the ethics landscape. PLoS Med 2017; 14:e1002470. [PMID: 29220353 PMCID: PMC5722280 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In an essay, Karine Dubé and coauthors discuss the ethics of preclinical and clinical studies relevant to achieving an HIV cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Laurie Sylla
- defeatHIV Community Advisory Board (CAB), Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Lynda Dee
- amfAR Institute for HIV Cure Research CAB, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) CAB, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- AIDS Action Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Jeff Taylor
- amfAR Institute for HIV Cure Research CAB, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Collaboratory of AIDS Researchers for Eradication (CARE) CAB, Palm Springs, California, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - David Evans
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) CAB, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Project Inform, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Carl Dean Bruton
- Collaboratory of AIDS Researchers for Eradication (CARE) CAB, Palm Springs, California, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) CAB, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Adam Gilberston
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Lisa Gralinski
- University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Brandon Brown
- University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America
| | - Asheley Skinner
- University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI), Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Bryan J. Weiner
- University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Sandra B. Greene
- University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Amy Corneli
- Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI), Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Adaora A. Adimora
- UNC Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases (IGHID), Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Joseph D. Tucker
- UNC Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases (IGHID), Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- UNC Project China, Guangzhou, China
| | - Stuart Rennie
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- UNC Center for Bioethics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Eyal N, Holtzman LG. Invited Commentary on Dubé et al. (Perceptions of Equipoise, Risk/Benefit Ratios, and "Otherwise Healthy Volunteers" in the Context of Early-Phase HIV Cure Research in the United States-A Qualitative Inquiry): Are HIV-Infected Candidates for Participation in Risky Cure-Related Studies Otherwise Healthy? J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2017; 13:18-22. [PMID: 29179624 DOI: 10.1177/1556264617740244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nir Eyal
- 1 Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|