ADAPT technique in ischemic stroke treatment of M2 middle cerebral artery occlusions in comparison to M1 occlusions: Post hoc analysis of the PROMISE study

Placing the balloon-guide catheter in the high cervical segment of the internal carotid artery is associated with improved recanalization

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is part of the standard of care for stroke treatment, and improving its efficacy is one of the main objectives of clinical investigation. Of importance is placement of the distal end of balloon-guided catheters (BGC). We aim to determine if this influences outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the ASSIST Registry, an international, multicenter prospective study of 1492 patients. We divided patients treated with BGC according to the placement of the BGC: low cervical (LCG (the lower 2/3 of cervical internal carotid artery (ICA)) or high cervical (HCG (upper 1/3 of cervical ICA, petro-lacerum or higher)). We analyzed characteristics and outcomes overall and stratified on the primary MT technique: Stent-Retriever only (SR Classic), Combined use of aspiration catheter and SR (Combined), and Direct Aspiration (ADAPT).

RESULTS

Our study included 704 subjects -323 in the low cervical and 381 in the high cervical groups. Statistical differences were seen in the proportion of females and tandem lesions (both higher for LCG). Placing the BGC in the high cervical segment is associated with better recanalization rates (expanded treatment in cerebral infarction (eTICI) score of 2c-3) at the end of the procedure (P<0.0001) and shorter procedures (P=0.0005). After stratifying on the three primary techniques (SR Classic, Combined, and ADAPT), placing the BGC in the high segment is associated with a better first-pass effect (FPE), less distal emboli, and better clinical outcomes in the SR Classic technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Placing the distal end of the BGC at the high cervical segment or higher is associated with better recanalization.

Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Thrombectomy in M2 Occlusion Stroke: Real-World Experience Versus Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to establish the cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in M2 occlusions compared with patients who did not have EVT using both real-world and clinical trial evidence.

METHODS

The effectiveness of EVT in M2 occlusions was informed by the International Stroke Perfusion Imaging Registry (INSPIRE, real-world data for a wide range of strokes) and HERMES collaboration, trial data. Patients who received EVT and non-EVT treatment from INSPIRE were matched according to baseline characteristics. A Markov model with 7 health states defined by the 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) was constructed. Endovascular thrombectomy and non-EVT-treated patients in real-world, and clinical trials were run through the Markov model separately to generate the results from a limited societal perspective. National statistics and published literature informed the long-term probability of recurrent stroke, mortality, costs of management post-stroke, non-medical care, and nursing home care.

RESULTS

A total of 83 (42 EVT and 41 non-EVT) patients were matched of 278 (45 EVT and 233 non-EVT) patients in INSPIRE who had M2 occlusion stroke at presentation. The long-term simulation estimated that offering EVT to M2 occlusion stroke patients was associated with greater benefits (5.48 EVT vs 5.24 non-EVT quality-adjusted life year [QALY]) and higher costs (A$133 457 EVT vs A$126 127 non-EVT) compared with non-EVT treatment in real-world from a limited societal perspective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of EVT in real-world was A$29 981 (€19 488)/QALY. The analysis using the data from HERMES collaboration yielded consistent results for the EVT patients. Comparison with real-world cost-effectiveness analyses of EVT in internal carotid artery/middle cerebral artery-M1 (ICA/MCA-M1) occlusion suggested a potential reduced QALY gains and increased ICER in M2 occlusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that the benefits gained from EVT in M2 occlusion stroke in the real-world were similar to that derived from the clinical trials. The clinical and cost benefits from EVT appeared to be reduced in M2 compared with that from the ICA/MCA-M1 occlusions.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Our study has provided valuable insights into the clinical significance of endovascular therapy (EVT) in the context of M2 occlusion stroke within a real-world setting. It is noteworthy that our findings indicate that the benefits obtained from EVT in M2 occlusion stroke closely align with those observed in controlled clinical trials. However, it is essential to recognize that there is a reduction in the clinical and cost-related advantages when comparing M2 occlusions to more proximal ICA/MCA-M1 occlusions.

The diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence algorithms for identifying M2 segment middle cerebral artery occlusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms have been developed to facilitate rapid and accurate computed tomography angiography (CTA) assessment in proximal large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic stroke, including internal carotid artery and M1 occlusions. In clinical practice, however, the detection of medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) represents an ongoing diagnostic challenge in which the added value of AI remains unclear.

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic performance of AI platforms for detecting M2 occlusions.

METHODS

Studies that report the diagnostic performance of AI-based detection of M2 occlusions were screened, and sensitivity and specificity data were extracted using the semi-automated AutoLit software (Nested Knowledge, MN) platform. STATA (version 16 IC; Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA) was used to conduct all analyses.

RESULTS

Eight studies with a low risk of bias and significant heterogeneity were included in the quantitative and qualitative synthesis. The pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity of AI platforms for M2 occlusion detection were 64% (95% CI, 53 to 74%) and 97% (95% CI, 84 to 100%), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) in the SROC curve was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.83).

CONCLUSION

The current performance of the AI-based algorithm makes it more suitable as an adjunctive confirmatory tool rather than as an independent one for M2 occlusions. With the rapid development of such algorithms, it is anticipated that newer generations will likely perform much better.

Aspiration thrombectomy of M2 middle cerebral artery occlusion to treat acute ischemic stroke: A core lab–adjudicated subset analysis from the COMPLETE registry and literature review

Background

Although the benefits of aspiration thrombectomy for treating acute ischemic stroke caused by proximal large vessel occlusion have been established, fewer data are available for evaluating aspiration thrombectomy of distal occlusion. The objective of this study was to evaluate, by means of prospectively collected data, the safety and efficacy of aspiration thrombectomy in patients with M2 middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion.

Methods

This study is a subset analysis of a global prospective multicenter observational registry that included patients who presented with either anterior or posterior large vessel occlusion and were eligible for mechanical thrombectomy using the Penumbra System including the Penumbra 3D Revascularization Device. For this analysis, all patients in the registry with M2 MCA occlusion were included.

Results

Of the 650 patients in the registry, 113 (17.4%) had M2 MCA occlusion. The rate of a modified treatment in cerebral infarction score of 2b to 3 after the procedure was 79.6% (90/113), the rate of a modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2 at 90 days was 72.5% (79/109), and the all-cause mortality rate at 90 days was 8.8% (10/113). Device-related serious adverse events occurred in one patient (0.9%) within 24 h and in two patients (1.8%) overall. Procedure-related serious adverse events occurred in four patients (3.5%) within 24 h and in six patients (5.3%) overall (nine events).

Conclusion

For appropriately selected patients, aspiration thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to M2 MCA occlusion was safe and effective, with high rates of technical success and good functional outcome.

Endovascular treatment for acute M2 occlusion stroke within 6 hours-a retrospective real-world evidence

Background

We compared the efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy (EVT), intravenous (IV) thrombolysis and conservative treatment in M2 segment occlusion stroke based on a real-world database.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the database of admitted patients with M2 segment occlusion between January 2018 and December 2020. The patients who were eligible for reperfusion treatment were assigned to EVT, IV thrombolysis or conservative treatment according to the exact management proceeding. The primary outcome was a score of 0 and 1 on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days. The odds ratio (OR) for the primary outcome was adjusted for age, baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score, and door-to-treatment time. The secondary outcomes were based on a mRS score from 0 to 2 at 90 days and the safety outcomes including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality. The data were analyzed by the logistical regression model, including baseline adjustments.

Results

A total of 109 patients were included. Among them, 42 (38.5%) patients received EVT, 45 (42.5%) received IV thrombolysis and 22 (20.8%) received conservative treatment. The primary outcome based on a mRS score of 0 and 1, occurred in 66.7% of patients in the EVT group and 40% in the IV thrombolysis group (adjusted OR, 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-2.68; P = 0.01). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 1 patient (2.3%) in the EVT group and in 2 patients (4.4%) in the IV thrombolysis group (adjusted OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.13-4.07).

Conclusion

EVT showed better functional outcomes than IV thrombolysis and conservative treatment in moderate to severe acute stoke patients with M2 occlusion. There was no significant difference in the three groups concerning the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

What You Always Wanted to Know about Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke but Never Dared to Ask: A Comprehensive Review

In 2015, mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in combination with intravenous thrombolysis was demonstrated to be superior to best medical treatment alone in patients with anterior circulation stroke. This finding resulted in an unprecedented boost in endovascular stroke therapy, and MT became widely available. MT was initially approved for patients presenting with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation (intracranial internal carotid artery or proximal middle cerebral artery) within a 6-hour time window. Eventually, it was shown to be beneficial in a broader group of patients, including those without known symptom-onset, wake-up stroke, or patients with posterior circulation stroke. Technical developments and the implementation of novel thrombectomy devices further facilitated endovascular recanalization for acute ischemic stroke. However, some aspects remain controversial. Is MT suitable for medium or very distal vessel occlusions? Should emergency stenting be performed for symptomatic stenosis or recurrent occlusion? How should patients with large vessel occlusion without disabling symptoms be treated? Do certain patients benefit from MT without intravenous thrombolysis? In the era of personalized decision-making, some of these questions require an individualized approach based on comorbidities, imaging criteria, and the severity or duration of symptoms. Despite its successful development in the past decade, endovascular stroke therapy will remain a challenging and fascinating field in the years to come. This review aims to provide an overview of patient selection, and the indications for and execution of MT in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Mechanical Thrombectomy for M2 Segment Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The safety and benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with M2 segment middle cerebral artery occlusions remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the benefit of mechanical thrombectomy for M2 occlusion compared with M1 occlusion in patients with AIS.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to April 2021 to identify relevant articles. The main results comprised 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Score from 0-2), successful recanalization (thrombectomy in cerebral infarction [TICI] 2b/3), mortality, and rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after using modern thrombectomy devices. Odds ratios (ORs) were generated for binary variants. ReviewManager 5.3 software was used.

RESULTS

Ultimately, a total of 14 trials were included, with 3454 participants enrolled. MT for M2 occlusion had a higher rate of 3-month functional independence than M1 occlusion, but the difference was nonsignificant (OR: 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98 to 1.46). The TICI2b/3 scores (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.58-0.88) in M2 occlusion were remarkably lower than those in M1. The mortality and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates were comparable between the 2 groups. When comparing M2 and M1 occlusions, we found that there was no significant difference between stent retriever and aspiration in the modified Rankin Score (0-2) after AIS, but aspiration exerted an eminently higher recanalization rate with regard to TICI2b/3 (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with M1 occlusion, patients with M2 occlusion treated by MT demonstrated similar clinical outcomes in this study. Moreover, there was no difference between stent retriever and aspiration in treating M2 occlusion in terms of functional independence at 90 days. However, aspiration exerted a conspicuously higher recanalization rate in M2 occlusion than in M1 occlusion.

Middle Cerebral Artery M2 Thrombectomy: Safety and Technical Considerations in the German Stroke Registry (GSR)

There is ongoing debate concerning the safety and efficacy of various mechanical thrombectomy (MT) approaches for M2 occlusions. We compared these for MT in M2 versus M1 occlusions. Subgroup analyses of different technical approaches within the M2 MT cohort were also performed. Patients were included from the German Stroke Registry (GSR), a multicenter registry of consecutive MT patients. Primary outcomes were reperfusion success events. Secondary outcomes were early clinical improvement (improvement in NIHSS score > 4) and independent survival at 90 days (mRS 0−2). Out of 3804 patients, 2689 presented with M1 (71%) and 1115 with isolated M2 occlusions (29%). The mean age was 76 (CI 65−82) and 77 (CI 66−83) years, respectively. Except for baseline NIHSS (15 (CI 10−18) vs. 11 (CI 6−16), p < 0.001) and ASPECTS (9 (CI 7−10) vs. 9 (CI 8−10, p < 0.001), baseline demographics were balanced. Apart from a more frequent use of dedicated small vessel stent retrievers (svSR) in M2 (17.4% vs. 3.0; p < 0.001), intraprocedural aspects were balanced. There was no difference in ICH at 24 h (11%; p = 1.0), adverse events (14.4% vs. 18.1%; p = 0.63), clinical improvement (62.5% vs. 61.4 %; p = 0.57), mortality (26.9% vs. 22.9%; p = 0.23). In M2 MT, conventional stent retriever (cSR) achieved higher rates of mTICI3 (54.0% vs. 37.7−42.0%; p < 0.001), requiring more MT-maneuvers (7, CI 2−8) vs. 2 (CI 2−7)/(CI 2−2); p < 0.001) and without impact on efficacy and outcome. Real-life MT in M2 can be performed with equal safety and efficacy as in M1 occlusions. Different recanalization techniques including the use of svSR did not result in significant differences regarding safety, efficacy and outcome.

Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever Thrombectomy for Distal, Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke in the Posterior Circulation: A Subanalysis of the TOPMOST Study

BACKGROUND

The optimal endovascular strategy for reperfusing distal medium-vessel occlusions (DMVO) remains unknown. This study evaluates angiographic and clinical outcomes of thrombectomy strategies in DMVO stroke of the posterior circulation.

METHODS

TOPMOST (Treatment for Primary Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke) is an international, retrospective, multicenter, observational registry of patients treated for DMVO between January 2014 and June 2020. This study analyzed endovascularly treated isolated primary DMVO of the posterior cerebral artery in the P2 and P3 segment. Technical feasibility was evaluated with the first-pass effect defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Scale score of 3. Rates of early neurological improvement and functional modified Rankin Scale scores at 90 days were compared. Safety was assessed by the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and intervention-related serious adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients met the inclusion criteria and were treated endovascularly for primary isolated DMVO in the P2 (84.4%, 119) or P3 segment (15.6%, 22) of the posterior cerebral artery. The median age was 75 (IQR, 62-81), and 45.4% (64) were female. The initial reperfusion strategy was aspiration only in 29% (41) and stent retriever in 71% (100), both achieving similar first-pass effect rates of 53.7% (22) and 44% (44; P=0.297), respectively. There were no significant differences in early neurological improvement (aspiration: 64.7% versus stent retriever: 52.2%; P=0.933) and modified Rankin Scale rates (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1, aspiration: 60.5% versus stent retriever 68.6%; P=0.4). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the time from groin puncture to recanalization was associated with the first-pass effect (adjusted odds ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95-0.99]; P<0.001) that in turn was associated with early neurological improvement (aOR, 3.27 [95% CI, 1.16-9.21]; P<0.025). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 2.8% (4) of all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Both first-pass aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy for primary isolated posterior circulation DMVO seem to be safe and technically feasible leading to similar favorable rates of angiographic and clinical outcome.

Cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute stroke and M2 occlusion

BACKGROUND

The cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to M2 branch occlusion remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of EVT compared with medical management in patients with acute stroke presenting with M2 occlusion using a decision-analytic model.

METHODS

A decision-analytic study was performed with Markov modeling to estimate the lifetime quality-adjusted life years and associated costs of EVT-treated patients compared with no-EVT/medical management. The study was performed over a lifetime horizon with a societal perspective in the Unites States setting. Base case, one-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

EVT was the long-term cost-effective strategy in 93.37% of the iterations in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and resulted in difference in health benefit of 1.66 QALYs in the 65-year-old age groups, equivalent to 606 days in perfect health. Varying the outcomes after both strategies shows that EVT was more cost-effective when the probability of good outcome after EVT was only 4-6% higher relative to medical management in clinically likely scenarios. EVT remained cost-effective even when its cost exceeded US$200 000 (threshold was US$209 111). EVT was even more cost-effective for 55-year-olds than for 65-year-old patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that EVT is cost-effective for treatment of acute M2 branch occlusions. Faster and improved reperfusion techniques would increase the relative cost-effectiveness of EVT even further in these patients.

Middle Cerebral Artery M2 Thrombectomy in the STRATIS Registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The safety and benefit of mechanical thrombectomy in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients with M2 segment middle cerebral artery occlusions remain uncertain. Here, we compare clinical and angiographic outcomes in M2 versus M1 occlusions in the STRATIS (Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke) Registry.

METHODS

The STRATIS Registry was a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, observational study of acute ischemic stroke large vessel occlusion patients treated with the Solitaire stent-retriever as the first-choice therapy within 8 hours from symptoms onset. Primary outcome was defined as functional disability at 3 months measured by dichotomized modified Rankin Scale. Secondary outcomes included reperfusion rates and rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

RESULTS

A total of 984 patients were included, of which 538 (54.7%) had M1 and 170 (17.3%) had M2 occlusions. Baseline demographics were well balanced within the groups, with the exception of mean baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score which was significantly higher in the M1 population (17.3±5.5 versus 15.7±5.0, P≤0.001). No difference was seen in mean puncture to revascularization times between the cohorts (46.0±27.8 versus 45.1±29.5 minutes, P=0.75). Rates of successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction≥2b) were similar between the groups (91% versus 95%, P=0.09). M2 patients had significantly increased rates of symptomatic ICH at 24 hours (4% versus 1%, P=0.01). Rates of good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2; 58% versus 59%, P=0.83) and mortality (15% versus 14%, P=0.75) were similar between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the association of outcome and onset to groin puncture or onset to successful reperfusion in M1 and M2 occlusions.

CONCLUSIONS

In the STRATIS Registry, M2 occlusions achieved similar rates of successful reperfusion, good functional outcome, and mortality, although increased rates of symptomatic ICH were demonstrated when compared with M1 occlusions. The time dependence of benefit was also similar between the 2 groups. Further studies are needed to understand the benefit of mechanical thrombectomy for M2 occlusions.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02239640.

Mechanical thrombectomy beyond the circle of Willis: efficacy and safety of different techniques for M2 occlusions

BACKGROUND

M2 segment occlusions represent approximately one-third of non-lacunar ischemic stroke and can lead to permanent neurological deficits. Various techniques are available for mechanical thrombectomy beyond the circle of Willis, but data evaluating their effectiveness and safety are lacking.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with ischemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for M2 occlusions from 13 centers in North American and Europe was performed. Tandem or multiple-territory occlusions were excluded. The primary outcome was 90-day modified Rankin Scale and reperfusion rates across stent-retriever, direct aspiration and combined techniques.

RESULTS

There were 465 patients (mean age 71.48±14.03 years, 53.1% female) with M2 occlusions who underwent mechanical thrombectomy. Stent-retriever alone was used in 133 (28.6%), direct aspiration alone in 93 (20.0%) and the combined technique in 239 (51.4%) patients. Successful reperfusion was achieved with the combined technique in 198 (82.2%; OR 2.6 (1.1-6.9)), with stent-retriever alone in 112 (84.2%; OR 9.2 (1.9-44.6)) and with direct aspiration alone in 62 (66.7%; referencecategory). Intraprocedural subarachnoid hemorrhages (iSAH) were 36 (7.7%) and were more likely to occur in patients treated with the stent-retrievers (OR 5.0 (1.1-24.3)) and combined technique (OR 4.6 (1.1-20.9)). Good clinical outcome was achieved in 260 (61.8%) patients, while 59 (14.0%) patients died. Older age, higher baseline NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), parenchymal hemorrhage and iSAH were associated with poor outcome while successful recanalization and higher baseline ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score) were associated with good outcome. No differences were found among the three techniques in terms of clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Stent-retrievers and a combined approach for M2 occlusions seem more effective than direct aspiration, but with higher rates of iSAH. This leads to no detectable difference in clinical outcome at 3 months.

Comparision of Mechanical Thrombectomy With Contact Aspiration or Stent Retriever in Patients With Large-vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVES

Whether the direct aspiration approach of thrombectomy for recanalization in patients with acute ischemic stroke has a similar efficacy and safety compared to the stent-retriever still remains uncertain.

METHODS

A retrospective data analysis was performed to identify patients with large cerebral artery acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy. The study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2019 in a single stroke center.

RESULTS

Twenty patients met inclusion criteria for this study with a mean age 66.64 ± 17.92 years' old. The symptom occurred on the left side were in 13, and the right side in 7. The location of occlusion was 8 in M1 of the middle cerebral artery of M2, and 6 in internal carotid artery. Nine patients were randomized to first-line treatment with contact aspiration and eleven to first-line treatment with a stent retriever. The mean time from admission time to groin puncture was 55.51 ± 31.03 minutes. The average time from groin puncture to maximal revascularizion after mechanical thrombectomy was 50.9 ± 22.5 minutes in contact aspiration group, but this time was 71.37 ± 25.45 minutes in the group of stent retriever. The overall successful revascularization rate (TICI 2b-3) was 88.9% in contact aspiration (TICI2a = 1, TICI 2b = 4 patients, TICI 3 = 4 patients), and 90.1% in stent retriever (TICI2a = 1, TICI 2b = 6 patients, TICI 3 = 4 patients).

DISCUSSION

First-line thrombectomy with contact aspiration did not result in a higher successful revascularization rate at the end of the procedure but had a short time from groin puncture to maximal revascularizion.

Aspiration thrombectomy as the first-line treatment of M2 occlusions

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was (i) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of aspiration thrombectomy in patients with M2 occlusions and (ii) to compare outcome of treatment of occlusion of different M2 segments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2016 and June 2019, 82 patients with acute ischemic stroke and isolated M2 occlusions were treated in cerebrovascular stroke center with aspiration thrombectomy as the first-line treatment. Functional outcomes of patients with different types of M2 occlusions were statistically compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with good clinical outcome.

RESULTS

The mean age was 71.9 ± 13.4 years, 47.6% were men. Aspiration thrombectomy alone was utilized in 72.5% of patients, with 27.5% of patients being treated with a combination of aspiration thrombectomy and stent retriever. At the three-month follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in functional outcome between different types of M2 occlusions (p = 0.662), however in the underpowered analysis because of the small sample size of patients, with good clinical outcome mRS 0-2 in 50% of all treated patients. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was found in 6.1% of patients. Lower age (OR 0.932, 95% CI 0.878-0.988) and lower NIHSS score upon admission (OR 0.893, 95% CI 0.805-0.991) were independent predictors of good clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Aspiration thrombectomy appeared to be a safe and effective first-line treatment option for patients with M2 occlusion, being the first-line option for almost three-quarters of patients.