1
|
Trébol J, Carabias-Orgaz A, Esteban-Velasco MC, García-Plaza A, González-Muñoz JI, Sánchez-Casado AB, Parreño-Manchado FC, Eguía-Larrea M, Alcázar-Montero JA. Digestive and breast cancer patients managed during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic: Short and middle term outcomes. World J Methodol 2024; 14:92612. [PMID: 38983654 PMCID: PMC11229877 DOI: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i2.92612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Spain lasted from middle March to the end of June 2020. Spanish population was subjected to lockdown periods and scheduled surgeries were discontinued or reduced during variable periods. In our centre, we managed patients previously and newly diagnosed with cancer. We established a strategy based on limiting perioperative social contacts, preoperative screening (symptoms and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction) and creating separated in-hospital COVID-19-free pathways for non-infected patients. We also adopted some practice modifications (surgery in different facilities, changes in staff and guidelines, using continuously changing personal protective equipment…), that supposed new inconveniences. AIM To analyse cancer patients with a decision for surgery managed during the first wave, focalizing on outcomes and pandemic-related modifications. METHODS We prospectively included adults with a confirmed diagnosis of colorectal, oesophago-gastric, liver-pancreatic or breast cancer with a decision for surgery, regardless of whether they ultimately underwent surgery. We analysed short-term outcomes [30-d postoperative morbimortality and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection] and outcomes after 3 years (adjuvant therapies, oncological events, death, SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination). We also investigated modifications to usual practice. RESULTS From 96 included patients, seven didn't receive treatment that period and four never (3 due to COVID-19). Operated patients: 28 colon and 21 rectal cancers; laparoscopy 53.6%/90.0%, mortality 3.57%/0%, major complications 7.04%/25.00%, anastomotic leaks 0%/5.00%, 3-years disease-free survival (DFS) 82.14%/52.4% and overall survival (OS) 78.57%/76.2%. Six liver metastases and six pancreatic cancers: no mortality, one major complication, three grade A/B liver failures, one bile leak; 3-year DFS 0%/33.3% and OS 50.0%/33.3% (liver metastases/pancreatic carcinoma). 5 gastric and 2 oesophageal tumours: mortality 0%/50%, major complications 0%/100%, anastomotic leaks 0%/100%, 3-year DFS and OS 66.67% (gastric carcinoma) and 0% (oesophagus). Twenty breast cancer without deaths/major complications; 3-year OS 100% and DFS 85%. Nobody contracted SARS-CoV-2 postoperatively. COVID-19 pandemic-related changes: 78.2% treated in alternative buildings, 43.8% waited more than 4 weeks, two additional colostomies and fewer laparoscopies. CONCLUSION Some patients lost curative-intent surgery due to COVID-19 pandemic. Despite practice modifications and 43.8% delays higher than 4 weeks, surgery was resumed with minimal changes without impacting outcomes. Clean pathways are essential to continue surgery safely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacobo Trébol
- Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Salamanca, Spain
- Cirugía, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Ana Carabias-Orgaz
- Oftalmología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Salamanca, Spain
| | - María Carmen Esteban-Velasco
- Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Salamanca, Spain
- Cirugía, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Asunción García-Plaza
- Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Juan Ignacio González-Muñoz
- Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Salamanca, Spain
- Cirugía, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Ana Belén Sánchez-Casado
- Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Felipe Carlos Parreño-Manchado
- Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Salamanca, Spain
- Cirugía, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Marta Eguía-Larrea
- Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Salamanca, Spain
- Cirugía, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Salamanca, Spain
| | - José Antonio Alcázar-Montero
- Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Salamanca, Spain
- Cirugía, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Salamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thomson WR, Puthucheary ZA, Wan YI. Critical care and pandemic preparedness and response. Br J Anaesth 2023; 131:847-860. [PMID: 37689541 PMCID: PMC10636520 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Critical care was established partially in response to a polio epidemic in the 1950s. In the intervening 70 yr, several epidemics and pandemics have placed critical care and allied services under extreme pressure. Pandemics cause wholesale changes to accepted standards of practice, require reallocation and retargeting of resources and goals of care. In addition to clinical acumen, mounting an effective critical care response to a pandemic requires local, national, and international coordination in a diverse array of fields from research collaboration and governance to organisation of critical care networks and applied biomedical ethics in the eventuality of triage situations. This review provides an introduction to an array of topics that pertain to different states of pandemic acuity: interpandemic preparedness, alert, surge activity, recovery and relapse through the literature and experience of recent pandemics including COVID-19, H1N1, Ebola, and SARS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William R Thomson
- Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, UK; William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| | - Zudin A Puthucheary
- Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, UK; William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Yize I Wan
- Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, UK; William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lennon C, Harvey D, Goldstein PA. Ethical considerations for theatre teams in organ donation after circulatory determination of death. Br J Anaesth 2023; 130:502-507. [PMID: 36801100 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Transplant surgery is an area that gives rise to a number of ethical considerations. As medicine continues to expand the boundaries of what is technically possible, we must consider the ethical implications of our interventions, not solely on patients and society, but also on those asked to provide that care. Here, we consider physician participation in procedures required to provide patient care in the context of the ethical convictions held by the physician, with an emphasis on organ donation after circulatory determination of death. Strategies that can be used to mitigate any potential negative impact on the psychological well-being of members of the patient care team are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dan Harvey
- National Health Service Blood & Transplant, UK; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Peter A Goldstein
- Department of Anesthesiology, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Puthucheary ZA, Rice TW. Nutritional priorities in patients with severe COVID-19. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2022; 25:277-281. [PMID: 35703977 PMCID: PMC9247039 DOI: 10.1097/mco.0000000000000835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The COVID-19 pandemic has altered the profile of critical care services internationally, as professionals around the globe have struggled to rise to the unprecedented challenge faced, both in terms of individual patient management and the sheer volume of patients that require treatment and management in intensive care. This review article sets out key priorities in nutritional interventions during the patient journey, both in the acute and recovery phases. RECENT FINDINGS The current review covers the care of the acutely unwell patient, and the evidence base for nutritional interventions in the COVID-19 population. One of the biggest differences in caring for critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure from COVID-19 is often the time prior to intubation. This represents specific nutritional challenges, as does nursing patients in the prone position or in the setting of limited resources. This article goes on to discuss nutritional support for COVID-19 sufferers as they transition through hospital wards and into the community. SUMMARY Nutritional support of patients with severe COVID-19 is essential. Given the longer duration of their critical illness, combined with hypermetabolism and energy expenditure, patients with COVID-19 are at increased risk for malnutrition during and after their hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zudin A Puthucheary
- William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London
- Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Todd W Rice
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research
- Division of Allergy, Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Death following pulmonary complications of surgery before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Br J Surg 2021; 108:1448-1464. [PMID: 34871379 PMCID: PMC10364875 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to determine the impact of pulmonary complications on death after surgery both before and during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. METHODS This was a patient-level, comparative analysis of two, international prospective cohort studies: one before the pandemic (January-October 2019) and the second during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (local emergence of COVID-19 up to 19 April 2020). Both included patients undergoing elective resection of an intra-abdominal cancer with curative intent across five surgical oncology disciplines. Patient selection and rates of 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications were compared. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative mortality. Mediation analysis using a natural-effects model was used to estimate the proportion of deaths during the pandemic attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS This study included 7402 patients from 50 countries; 3031 (40.9 per cent) underwent surgery before and 4371 (59.1 per cent) during the pandemic. Overall, 4.3 per cent (187 of 4371) developed postoperative SARS-CoV-2 in the pandemic cohort. The pulmonary complication rate was similar (7.1 per cent (216 of 3031) versus 6.3 per cent (274 of 4371); P = 0.158) but the mortality rate was significantly higher (0.7 per cent (20 of 3031) versus 2.0 per cent (87 of 4371); P < 0.001) among patients who had surgery during the pandemic. The adjusted odds of death were higher during than before the pandemic (odds ratio (OR) 2.72, 95 per cent c.i. 1.58 to 4.67; P < 0.001). In mediation analysis, 54.8 per cent of excess postoperative deaths during the pandemic were estimated to be attributable to SARS-CoV-2 (OR 1.73, 1.40 to 2.13; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Although providers may have selected patients with a lower risk profile for surgery during the pandemic, this did not mitigate the likelihood of death through SARS-CoV-2 infection. Care providers must act urgently to protect surgical patients from SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Collapse
|