Sequential Therapy for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication: The Time is Now!

Addressing Challenges in Standardizing Helicobacter pylori Treatment Protocols: Importance and Review

Helicobacter pylori, one of the top carcinogens, is associated with most cases of gastric cancer-related deaths worldwide. Over the past two decades, the rising rates of antibiotic resistance in the bacterium have reduced the efficacy of conventional antibiotic-based treatments. This underscores the urgency for continued research and novel treatment approaches. Establishing a worldwide accepted physician guideline for antibiotic prescription is crucial to combat antibiotic resistance and improve H. pylori infection management. Therefore, it is important to address the challenges that complicate the establishment of a universally accepted treatment protocol to prescribe an antibiotic regimen to eradicate H. pylori. The answers to the questions of why conventional standard triple therapy remains a first-line treatment choice despite its low efficacy, and how different factors affect therapy choice, are needed to identify these challenges. Hence, this review addresses concerns related to H. pylori treatment choice, role of antibiotic resistance and patient compliance in treatment outcomes, first-line vs. second-line therapy options, and methods for enhancing existing treatment methods. We also present a chart to aid antibiotic treatment prescription, which may support physician guidelines in this aspect. Eradication of H. pylori and patient adherence is paramount in overcoming antibiotic resistance in the bacterium, and our chart summarizes key considerations and suggests novel approaches to achieve this goal.

Efficacy and tolerability of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimes in South Kivu, Eastern of the Democratic Republic of Congo: A single center observational study

Background and Aims

Treating Helicobacter pylori infections has become a major challenge due to increased antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of the main standard regimens recommended for H. pylori eradication in Bukavu, Eastern of the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Methods

The study enrolled patients with evidence of H. pylori infection in histological examination or serology testing combined with a positive fecal antigen test. As first-line treatment, patients were randomized to either a 10-days (OAC-10) or a 14-days (OAC-14) regimen, employing a combination of omeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily. In case of failure, a second line regimen was evaluated and included two others protocols: OAC-10 regimen + levofloxacin 500 mg (OAC-10+) and the bismuth-based therapy (pantoprazole + bismuth salt + metronidazole + tetracycline) during 10 days. Our primary endpoint was H. pylori eradication and secondarily, the compliance and adverse effects were also evaluated.

Results

A total of 179 patients were enrolled. The eradication rate was 79.2% and 80.5% with the OAC-10 and OAC-14 regimen, respectively (p = 0.796). Adverse effects were significant higher in the OAC-14 group than in the OAC-10 group (36.5% vs. 57.8%; p < 0.001). On the other hand, the compliance rate was slightly higher in the OAC-10 group (97.9% vs. 91.6%, p = 0.052) while clinical improvement was almost similar in both groups. Regarding the second line regimen, the bismuth-based therapy (n = 18) seemed to show a better response with 100% of eradication rate and 100% of clinical improvement.

Conclusion

The classic 10-days triple therapy seems to be as effective as the 14-days regimen while having in addition a good tolerance. Apart from cost issues, the bismuth-based therapy seems to be a very good alternative in case of first-line treatment failure.

Sequential versus Standard Triple Therapy for First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication: An Update

BACKGROUND

non-bismuth sequential therapy (SEQ) was suggested as a first-line anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment alternative to standard triple therapy (STT).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review with a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of 10-day SEQ vs. STT (of at least 7 days) using bibliographical searches up to July 2021, including treatment-naïve adult or children. The intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rate and the risk difference (RD) were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 69 RCTs were evaluated, including 19,657 patients (9486 in SEQ; 10,171 in STT). Overall, SEQ was significantly more effective than STT (82% vs. 75%; RD 0.08; p < 0.001). The results were highly heterogeneous (I2 = 68%), and 38 studies did not demonstrate differences between therapies. Subgroup analyses suggested that patients with clarithromycin resistance only and all geographical areas but South America could benefit more from SEQ. Both therapies have evolved over the years, showing similar results when STT lasted 14 days; however, a tendency toward lower SEQ efficacy was noted from 2010 onwards.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior to 2010, SEQ was significantly more effective than STT, notably when 7-day STT was prescribed. A tendency toward lower differences between SEQ and STT has been noted, especially when using 10-day STT. None of the therapies achieved an optimal efficacy and therefore cannot be recommended as a valid first-line H. pylori treatment.

Efficacy of Sequential Therapy as the First-Line Treatment in the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori

The Helicobacter pylori infection is a significant issue in global health as it is associated with a range of gastrointestinal disorders and an elevated likelihood of developing stomach cancer. The declining efficacy of standard triple therapy (TT) as the recommended treatment can be attributed to the emergence of drug-resistant strains. Sequential therapy (ST) has been recognized as an alternative approach, wherein a combination of proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and amoxicillin is administered for the initial five days, followed by a combination of PPI, clarithromycin, and metronidazole for the subsequent five days. In this comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, we have thoroughly assessed the effectiveness and tolerability of ST as a primary treatment option in comparison to TT for the eradication of H. pylori. The analysis comprised a total of 15 randomized controlled trials, encompassing a sample size of 5,219 patients. The collective findings indicate that ST exhibits promise as it achieves higher rates of eradication. Additionally, it is worth noting that this approach has the potential to yield cost savings and enhance treatment compliance when compared to TT. To summarize, this systematic review and meta-analysis provide evidence that ST is a viable option for the initial treatment of H. pylori eradication. It shows potential benefits compared to the standard TT, especially when there is resistance to clarithromycin. In order to establish ST as the preferred first-line treatment, it is imperative that additional research be conducted to address the aforementioned limitations and thoroughly investigate its long-term efficacy and safety profiles. Nevertheless, it is required that additional research be conducted in order to adequately tackle the constraints of the current studies and solidify its position as a favored treatment alternative. It is also essential to consider ST as a viable approach to improve the rates of H. pylori eradication. This method should be thoroughly examined in clinical practice to gain a deeper understanding of its effectiveness.

Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness Comparison of 10-Day, 14-Day Sequential Versus 14-Day Triple Therapies for Treating Helicobacter pylori Infection in Egyptian Patients

GOALS

The aim of this study was to clarify whether 10-day or 14-day sequential therapy (ST) can replace conventional triple therapy (TT) as a first-line treatment in Egypt.

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance has decreased the eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori infection worldwide.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who tested positive for H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to the 14-day triple-therapy group (n=34), 10-day ST group (n=34), or 14-day ST group (n=35). Sequential treatment includes lansoprazole 30 mg and amoxicillin 1000 mg, both twice for 5 or 7 days, followed by lansoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and tinidazole 500 mg, each twice for 5 or 7 days. Triple treatment consists of lansoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and amoxicillin 1000 mg, each twice for 14 days. Six weeks after treatment discontinuation, patients were examined by the urea breath test. Eradication rates, the incidence of adverse effects, compliance, and cost-effectiveness were evaluated.

RESULTS

The eradication rate was 90% with 10-day ST, 96.7% with 14-day ST, and 63.3% for TT (P=0.001). Mild tolerated adverse effects occurred in the 3 groups. The cost-effectiveness ratio was 2194 LE, 1241 LE, 1157 LE for standard triple therapy, 10-day, and 14-day ST, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential therapies for 10 or 14 days are more cost-effective than standard TT, with 14-day ST being the most cost-effective. Accordingly, ST might replace TT as a first-line treatment for H. pylori infection in Egyptian patients.

Sequential Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in Myanmar; a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and tolerability

BACKGROUND AND AIM

There is little published research to examine the best approach to the management of Helicobacter pylori in Myanmar. This study aimed to determine the relative efficacy and tolerability of sequential eradication therapy compared to Myanmar's current recommendation of a concomitant four drug regimen.

METHODS

Patients were screened for H. pylori using monoclonal Stool Antigen Testing (SAT). Those testing positive were randomized 1:1 to receive receive Myanmar's first-line regimen of 14 days of concomitant rabeprazole, clarithromycin, amoxycillin and tinidazole (140 pills, cost US$23) or 10 days of sequential rabeprazole, clarithromycin, amoxycillin and tinidazole (60 pills, cost US$10). Adherence and adverse effects were recorded, and the efficacy of the regimens assessed with repeat SAT.

RESULTS

Of the 1011 patients screened for H. pylori infection, 313 (31%) tested positive. There was no statistical difference in the cure rates of the two regimens in either intention-to-treat: 128/157 (82%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 75-87%) receiving sequential therapy versus 123/156 (79%; 95% CI: 72-85%) receiving concomitant therapy (P = 0.55) or per-protocol analysis: 125/131 (95%; 95% CI: 90-98) receiving sequential therapy versus 121/130 (93%; 95% CI: 87-96) receiving concomitant therapy (P = 0.42). Side effects of therapy were reported in 54/157 (47%) patients taking sequential therapy compared with 62/156 (53%) taking concomitant therapy, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

In this high-burden, resource-poor setting, less expensive sequential therapy was as effective and as well tolerated as the currently recommended concomitant four drug regimen for eradication of H. pylori.

Efficacy and tolerability of fourteen-day sequential quadruple regimen: pantoprazole, bismuth, amoxicillin, metronidazole and or furazolidone as first-line therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial

The optimal pharmacological regimen for eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has been investigated for many years. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of bismuth-based quadruple therapy (B-QT) and a modified sequential therapy (ST) regimens in eradication of H. pylori. A randomized, double-blind trial was conducted on 344 patients. Patients with H. pylori infection and without a history of previous treatment were randomized to receive 14-day B-QT (bismuth subcitrate 240 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily) or 14-day ST (bismuth subcitrate 240 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg twice a day for seven days followed by bismuth subcitrate 240 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and furazolidone 100 mg twice a day for additional seven days). Drug adverse effects were assessed during the study. H. pylori eradication was determined eight weeks after the end of treatment using ¹⁴C-urea breath test. Based on per-protocol and intention-to-treat, the eradication rate was significantly higher (p<0.05) in the B-QT regimen 91.9 % (95 % CI; 88.1-94.0) and 90.2 % (95 % CI; 86.3-92.9), respectively compared to the ST regimen 80.8 % (95 % CI; 76.6-84.9) and 78.1 % (95 % CI; 73.7-82.4), respectively. The severity of vomiting and loss of appetite were significantly higher in ST regimen (p<0.05). The B-QT regimen was more effective and safer than the ST regimen. Conclusively, it is suggested to assess the efficacy and safety of this regimen in longer studies, larger population, and in other communities.

Comparison of Levofloxacin-Based, 10-day Sequential Therapy with 14-day Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Considering the importance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication, this clinical trial was designed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of levofloxacin-based, sequential therapy in comparison with quadruple therapy for eradicating H. pylori.

METHODS

Overall 156 patients with dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were included in this study and were randomly allocated to either 10-day sequential therapy group (group A) to receive pantoprazole (40 mg twice daily), amoxicillin (1 gr twice daily), levofloxacin (500 mg twice daily), and tinidazole (500 mg twice daily) (PALT) or 14-day quadruple therapy group (group B) to receive pantoprazole, clarithromycin, bismuth subcitrate, and amoxicillin (PABC). At the end of the study the eradication rate in each group was assessed by urea breath test (UBT).

RESULTS

Age range of the participants was 18-65 years (average 36.9 years) and 50% of them (78 patients) were men. 78 patients were allocated to group A and 78 patients to groupe B. After antibiotic therapy, all the patients received acid suppression therapy with Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) for 4 weeks and then the eradication rate was confirmed by UBT (Heli FAN plus 13C, Germany). Before performing UBT, all the participants were requested to halt consumption of PPI for at least 1 week. During the treatment there was not any major complication but in group A (sequential therapy), two patients complained of minor complications including musculoskeletal pain. None of the patients in group B had any complaint or side effect. The rate of H. pylori eradication in group A was 78.2% (61 patients) while this rate in group B was 83.3% (65 patients) with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.42). In subgroup analysis, the rate of eradication among men in group A and B were 76.9% and 89.7%, respectively (p = 0.22) while the eradication rate among women were 79.4% and 76.9%, respectively (p = 1.00).

CONCLUSION

It seems that levofloxacin base sequential therapy does not have any advantage in comparison with quadruple regimen and until finding any more effective short course therapy for H. Pylori eradication; we encourage quadruple regimen to be used as the first line therapy.

Pylera and sequential therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a culture-based study in real clinical practice

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Italian guideline suggests 10-day sequential or bismuth-based quadruple therapies for first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment. Comparison between these regimens is lacking. We assessed the efficacy of these therapies in clinical practice and evaluated the role of primary bacterial resistance toward clarithromycin and metronidazole.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with H. pylori infection were enrolled. Bacterial culture with antibiotics susceptibility testing was attempted in all cases. Patients received either a sequential therapy with esomeprazole 40 mg for 10 days plus amoxicillin 1000 mg for the first 5 days followed by clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg (all twice daily) for the remaining 5 days, or bismuth-based therapy with esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily and Pylera 3 tablets four times daily for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by using C-urea breath test.

RESULTS

A total of 495 patients were enrolled. Following sequential (250 patients) and quadruple (245 patients) therapies, the eradication rate were 92 and 91%, respectively, at intention-to-treat analysis and 96 and 97%, respectively, at per protocol analysis. Overall, the pattern of bacterial resistance did not significantly affect the cure rate, but the presence of clarithromycin and metronidazole dual resistance tended to reduce the success rate of both sequential (84.8 vs. 90.1%; P=0.4) and quadruple (85 vs. 94.1%; P=0.06) therapies. Adverse events occurred more frequently with the quadruple than with sequential therapy (56.9 vs. 25.8%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

In our country, sequential and bismuth-based quadruple therapy achieved similarly high eradication rates as first-line treatments for H. pylori infection in clinical practice.

First-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a critical reappraisal of updated guidelines

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment remains a challenge for the clinician, as no available therapy is able to cure the infection in all treated patients. In the last two decades, several antibiotic combinations have been proposed, including triple therapies, bismuth-free therapies (sequential, concomitant, hybrid regimens), and bismuth-based quadruple therapy. Some national and international guidelines on H. pylori management have recently been updated, recommending or discouraging the use of each of these therapeutic approaches, based mainly on the presumed pattern of primary antibiotic resistance in different geographic areas. We examined the recommendations on first-line therapies in the most recently updated guidelines worldwide, taking into account other data affecting the efficacy of a therapy regimen beyond the primary resistance pattern. Although several guidelines highlighted that the results achieved by an eradication therapy are population-specific and not directly transferable, it emerged that some therapy regimens are recommended or discouraged with no mention of the vital need for national data.

Hybrid Therapy Regimen for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication

Objective:

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication remains a challenge with increasing antibiotic resistance. Hybrid therapy has attracted widespread attention because of initial report with good efficacy and safety. However, many issues on hybrid therapy are still unclear such as the eradication efficacy, safety, compliance, influencing factors, correlation with antibiotic resistance, and comparison with other regimens. Therefore, a comprehensive review on the evidence of hybrid therapy for H. pylori infection was conducted.

Data Sources:

The data used in this review were mainly from PubMed articles published in English up to September 30, 2015, searching by the terms of “Helicobacter pylori” or “H. pylori”, and “hybrid”.

Study Selection:

Clinical research articles were selected mainly according to their level of relevance to this topic.

Results:

Totally, 1871 patients of 12 studies received hybrid therapy. The eradication rates were 77.6–97.4% in intention-to-treat and 82.6–99.1% in per-protocol analyses. Compliance was 93.3–100.0%, overall adverse effects rate was 14.5–67.5%, and discontinued medication rate due to adverse effects was 0–6.7%. H. pylori culture and sensitivity test were performed only in 13.3% patients. Pooled analysis showed that the eradication rates with dual clarithromycin and metronidazole susceptible, isolated metronidazole or clarithromycin resistance, and dual clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance were 98.5%, 97.6%, 92.9%, and 80.0%, respectively. Overall, the efficacy, compliance, and safety of hybrid therapy were similar with sequential or concomitant therapy. However, hybrid therapy might be superior to sequential therapy in Asians.

Conclusions:

Hybrid therapy showed wide differences in the efficacy but consistently good compliance and safety across different regions. Dual clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance were the key factor to efficacy. Hybrid therapy was similar to sequential or concomitant therapy in the efficacy, safety, and compliance.

Optimal First-Line Treatment for Helicobacter pylori Infection: Recent Strategies

A new treatment strategy is needed, as the efficacy of triple therapy containing clarithromycin—the current standard treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection—is declining. Increasing antibiotic resistance of H. pylori is the most significant factor contributing to eradication failure. Thus, selecting the most appropriate regimen depending on resistance is optimal, but identifying resistance to specific antibiotics is clinically challenging. In a region suspected to have high clarithromycin resistance, bismuth quadruple therapy and so-called nonbismuth quadruple therapies (sequential, concomitant, and sequential-concomitant hybrid) are some first-line regimen options. However, more research is needed regarding appropriate second-line treatments after first-line treatment failure. Tailored therapy, which is based on antibiotic sensitivity testing, would be optimal but has several limitations for clinical use, and an alternative technique is required. A novel potassium-competitive acid blocker-based eradication regimen could be a valuable eradication option in the near future.

Gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma and Helicobacter pylori infection: a review of current diagnosis and management

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-associated gastritis is one of the most common infectious diseases in the United States, China and worldwide. Gastric mucosa-associated tissue lymphoma (MALT lymphoma) is a rare mature B-cell neoplasm associated with H. pylori infection that is curable by antibiotics therapy alone. The pathological diagnosis of gastric MALT lymphoma can be reached by histological examination, immunohistochemical staining and B-cell clonality analysis. H. pylori eradication is the choice of therapy for early-stage gastric MALT lymphoma. High response rates and long-term survival have been reported in refractory and localized diseases treated with low-dose radiation therapy. Systemic chemotherapy is recommended for advanced-stage gastric MALT lymphoma and cases with large B-cell lymphoma transformation. Recent advances in the pathological diagnosis and management of gastric MALT lymphoma are reviewed in this article.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: Current and future insights

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is an important major cause of peptic ulcer disease and gastric malignancies such as mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma and gastric adenocarcinoma worldwide. H. pylori treatment still remains a challenge, since many determinants for successful therapy are involved such as individual primary or secondary antibiotics resistance, mucosal drug concentration, patient compliance, side-effect profile and cost. While no new drug has been developed, current therapy still relies on different mixture of known antibiotics and anti-secretory agents. A standard triple therapy consisting of two antibiotics and a proton-pump inhibitor proposed as the first-line regimen. Bismuth-containing quadruple treatment, sequential treatment or a non-bismuth quadruple treatment (concomitant) are also an alternative therapy. Levofloxacin containing triple treatment are recommended as rescue treatment for infection of H. pylori after defeat of first-line therapy. The rapid acquisition of antibiotic resistance reduces the effectiveness of any regimens involving these remedies. Therefore, adding probiotic to the medications, developing anti-H. pylori photodynamic or phytomedicine therapy, and achieving a successful H. pylori vaccine may have the promising to present synergistic or additive consequence against H. pylori, because each of them exert different effects.

New Biology to New Treatment of Helicobacter pylori-Induced Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori is a bacterial carcinogen that is supposed to have the highest known level of risk for the development of gastric cancer, a disease that claims hundreds of thousands of lives per year. Approximately 89% of the global gastric cancer burden and 5.5% of malignancies worldwide are attributed to H. pylori-induced inflammation and injury. However, only a fraction of colonized persons ever develop neoplasia, and disease risk involves well-choreographed interactions between pathogen and host, which are dependent upon strain-specific bacterial factors, host genotypic traits, and/or environmental conditions.

KEY MESSAGES

One H. pylori strain-specific virulence determinant that augments the risk for gastric cancer is the cag pathogenicity island, a secretion system that injects the bacterial oncoprotein CagA into host cells. Host polymorphisms within genes that regulate immunity and oncogenesis also heighten the risk for gastric cancer, in conjunction with H. pylori strain-specific constituents. Further, conditions such as iron deficiency and high salt intake can influence H. pylori phenotypes that lower the threshold for disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Delineation of bacterial, host, and environmental mediators that augment gastric cancer risk has profound ramifications for both physicians and biomedical researchers as such findings will not only focus prevention approaches that target H. pylori-infected human populations at increased risk for stomach cancer, but will also provide mechanistic insights into inflammatory carcinomas that develop beyond the gastric niche.

Using a sequential regimen to eliminate bacteria at sublethal antibiotic dosages

We need to find ways of enhancing the potency of existing antibiotics, and, with this in mind, we begin with an unusual question: how low can antibiotic dosages be and yet bacterial clearance still be observed? Seeking to optimise the simultaneous use of two antibiotics, we use the minimal dose at which clearance is observed in an in vitro experimental model of antibiotic treatment as a criterion to distinguish the best and worst treatments of a bacterium, Escherichia coli. Our aim is to compare a combination treatment consisting of two synergistic antibiotics to so-called sequential treatments in which the choice of antibiotic to administer can change with each round of treatment. Using mathematical predictions validated by the E. coli treatment model, we show that clearance of the bacterium can be achieved using sequential treatments at antibiotic dosages so low that the equivalent two-drug combination treatments are ineffective. Seeking to treat the bacterium in testing circumstances, we purposefully study an E. coli strain that has a multidrug pump encoded in its chromosome that effluxes both antibiotics. Genomic amplifications that increase the number of pumps expressed per cell can cause the failure of high-dose combination treatments, yet, as we show, sequentially treated populations can still collapse. However, dual resistance due to the pump means that the antibiotics must be carefully deployed and not all sublethal sequential treatments succeed. A screen of 136 96-h-long sequential treatments determined five of these that could clear the bacterium at sublethal dosages in all replicate populations, even though none had done so by 24 h. These successes can be attributed to a collateral sensitivity whereby cross-resistance due to the duplicated pump proves insufficient to stop a reduction in E. coli growth rate following drug exchanges, a reduction that proves large enough for appropriately chosen drug switches to clear the bacterium.

A laboratory treatment model shows that the sequentially alternating use of two antibiotics can be optimized to outperform combination treatments at the equivalent dose.

So-called “cocktail” treatments are often proposed as a way of enhancing the potency of antibiotics, based on the idea that multiple drugs can synergise when used together as part of a single combined therapy. We investigated whether any other multidrug deployment strategies are as effective as—or perhaps even better than—synergistic antibiotic combinations at reducing bacterial densities. “Collateral sensitivities” between antibiotics are frequently observed; this is when measures taken by a bacterium to counter the presence of one antibiotic sensitise it to the subsequent use of another. Our approach was to see if we could exploit these sensitivities by first deploying one drug, then removing it and instead deploying another, and then repeating this process. This is not an entirely new idea, and there is a precedence for this form of treatment that has been trialled in the clinic for Helicobacter pylori infection. The idea we pursued here is an extension of “sequential treatment”; we investigated whether with two antibiotics and n rounds of treatment, if we search within the set of all possible 2ⁿ “sequential treatments”—including the two single-drug monotherapies—there might be treatments within that set that are more effective than the equivalent two-drug cocktail. Using a simple in vitro treatment model, we show that some sequential-in-time antibiotic treatments are successful under conditions that cause the failure of the cocktail treatment when implemented at the equivalent dosage.

Sequential therapy versus standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in children: any advantage in clarithromycin-resistant strains?

OBJECTIVE

There has been a marked decrease in the eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori infection with standard triple therapy worldwide. Hence, sequential therapy has gained attention as a promising treatment during the last few years. This study was carried out to compare the efficacy of sequential versus standard triple therapy in the context of clarithromycin (CLA) resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, children between 3 and 18 years of age, who had documented H. pylori infection, were randomized to receive either standard triple or sequential therapy. H. pylori eradication was ascertained using the C-urea breath test 4-6 weeks after the completion of the treatment. Real-time PCR was performed on gastric biopsy samples for assessment of CLA resistance.

RESULTS

In all, 148 children (median age: 12.18±3.51 years) were recruited randomly into the study. The intention-to-treat eradication rates were 50% (37/74) for the sequential treatment group and 52.7% (39/74) for the standard triple treatment group (P=0.87). A total of 136 children completed the study. The per-protocol eradication rates were 56% (37/66) and 55.7% (39/70) for sequential and standard triple therapy groups, respectively. CLA resistance was assessed and 113 children were included in the final analysis. Of 113 participants, 53 were in the sequential treatment group and 60 were in the standard triple treatment group. The success rates of the respective therapies (29/53=54.7% in sequential, 33/60=55% in standard therapy) were similar (P=0.98). CLA resistance was detected in 29 (25.7%) of the patients. Eradication rates with sequential therapy in CLA susceptible and resistant cases were 60.5% (23/38) and 40% (6/15), respectively (P=0.23). The corresponding figures for the standard triple treatment group were 63% (29/46) and 28.6% (4/14) (P=0.033). Although a higher eradication rate was observed in CLA-resistant cases with sequential therapy, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.69).

CONCLUSION

In this study, standard triple treatment failed to eradicate H. pylori infection in the majority of the children, and sequential therapy offered only a small advantage over standard triple therapy in the eradication of CLA-resistant strains.

A randomised clinical trial of 10-day concomitant therapy and standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

As a result of increased resistance to antibiotics, Helicobacter pylori eradication rates using standard triple therapy have been declining.

AIM

To validate the efficacy and tolerability of a concomitant regimen as a first-line treatment for H. pylori infection.

METHODS

A total of 348 naïve H. pylori-infected patients from six hospitals in Korea were randomly assigned to concomitant therapy and standard triple therapy groups. The concomitant regimen consisted of 30 mg of lansoprazole, 1g of amoxicillin, 500 mg of clarithromycin, and 500 mg of metronidazole, twice daily for 10 days. The standard triple regimen consisted of 30 mg of lansoprazole, 1g of amoxicillin, and 500 mg of clarithromycin, twice daily for 10 days.

RESULTS

Concomitant and standard eradication rates were 78.7% (137/174) vs. 70.7% (123/174) by intention-to-treat (p=0.084) and 88.7% (133/150) vs. 78.4% (120/153) by per-protocol (p=0.016), respectively. The two groups were similar with regard to the incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Although 10-day concomitant therapy was validated as a suboptimal treatment option for the treatment of H. pylori infection, this regimen is expected to be a promising starting point in the development of an optimal treatment regimen for H. pylori infection.

Testing the optimality properties of a dual antibiotic treatment in a two-locus, two-allele model

Mathematically speaking, it is self-evident that the optimal control of complex, dynamical systems with many interacting components cannot be achieved with 'non-responsive' control strategies that are constant through time. Although there are notable exceptions, this is usually how we design treatments with antimicrobial drugs when we give the same dose and the same antibiotic combination each day. Here, we use a frequency- and density-dependent pharmacogenetics mathematical model based on a standard, two-locus, two-allele representation of how bacteria resist antibiotics to probe the question of whether optimal antibiotic treatments might, in fact, be constant through time. The model describes the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of different sub-populations of the bacterium Escherichia coli that compete for a single limiting resource in a two-drug environment. We use in vitro evolutionary experiments to calibrate and test the model and show that antibiotic environments can support dynamically changing and heterogeneous population structures. We then demonstrate, theoretically and empirically, that the best treatment strategies should adapt through time and constant strategies are not optimal.

Sequential therapy or triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in Asians: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori infection with triple therapy (TT) has declined in part to increased antibiotic resistance. Sequential therapy (ST) has shown promise in several meta-analyses. However, most of the studies included in previous meta-analyses were from Italy. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ST with that of TT in Asia by performing a meta-analysis of studies from Asia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies comparing the efficacy of ST with TT. Randomised controlled trials investigated in the Asian population were included. The odds ratios (OR) of eradicating H. pylori infection after ST compared with TT were pooled. The eradication rates were considered both on an intention-to-treat (ITT) and on a per-protocol basis (PP).

RESULTS

A total of nine studies provided data on 3074 adult patients. The odds ratio (OR) for eradication of H. pylori with ST compared with TT was 1.768 (95% CI: 1.476-2.117, P=0.000) for ITT analysis and 1.997 (95% CI: 1.607-2.480, P=0.000) for PP analysis. The pooled eradication rates of ITT analysis was 81.3% (95% CI: 76.5-85.3) for the ST group and 70.8% (95% CI: 64.6-76.4) for the TT group. The pooled eradication rates of PP analysis was 87.6% (95% CI: 84.1-90.5) for the ST group and 77.1% (95% CI: 70.9-82.3) for the TT group. There was no difference in the rate of adverse events between ST and TT (OR 0.945, 95% CI: 0.874-1.238, P=0.658).

CONCLUSION

ST appears to be better than TT in the eradication of H. pylori in Asia. These results suggest that ST may be a reasonable choice for first line therapy in Asia.

Guidelines for treatment of Helicobacter pylori in the East and West

Infection with Helicobacter pylori remains a major healthcare burden, with persistently high prevalence rates, especially in less-developed countries. H. pylori infection is causally related to non-malignant and malignant gastroduodenal diseases, such as peptic ulcer diseases, gastric cancer and gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Current international guidelines recommend a standard triple therapy as first-line therapy, including a proton pump inhibitor and a combination of amoxicillin and clarithromycin. Standard triple therapy has shown a decreasing efficacy over the years. The main reason is the increasing antibiotic resistance, particular to clarithromycin of H. pylori strains. Several new treatment options or modifications of already established regimens have been introduced to overcome treatment failure. In this article, we intend to report the reasons for treatment failure, and furthermore we give an overview of new treatment options as alternatives to the current treatment regimens. Finally, the strategy for the future is considered.

Optimized nonbismuth quadruple therapies cure most patients with Helicobacter pylori infection in populations with high rates of antibiotic resistance

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Strategies to eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection could be improved by suppressing acid and extending the duration of therapy (optimization). We compared the efficacy of 2 different optimized nonbismuth quadruple regimens in areas of high resistance to antimicrobial agents.

METHODS

We performed a prospective noninferiority multicenter trial in which 343 consecutive individuals with H pylori infection were assigned randomly to groups given hybrid therapy (40 mg omeprazole and 1 g amoxicillin, twice daily for 14 days; 500 mg clarithromycin and 500 mg nitroimidazole were added, twice daily for the final 7 days) or concomitant therapy (same 4 drugs taken concurrently, twice daily for 14 days). We assessed bacterial resistance to these drugs in a subset of patients using the E-test. Efficacy, side effects, and compliance were determined.

RESULTS

In per-protocol analysis, rates of eradication for hybrid and concomitant therapies were 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87%-95%) and 96.1% (95% CI, 93%-99%), respectively (P = .07). In intention-to-treat analysis, rates were 90% (95% CI, 86%-93%) and 91.7% (95% CI, 87%-95%), respectively (P = .35). Almost all patients (95.5%) were fully compliant; 23.5% of patients had H pylori strains that were resistant to clarithromycin (Italy, 26%; Spain, 19.5%), 33% were resistant to metronidazole (Italy, 33%; Spain, 34%), and 8.8% were resistant to both drugs (Italy, 7.1%; Spain, 11.5%). Side effects (only mild) were reported in 51.5% of patients (47% hybrid vs 56% concomitant; P = .06). Compliance greater than 80% was the only significant predictor of eradication (odds ratio, 12.5; 95% CI, 3.1-52; P = .001). Significantly more patients were compliant with hybrid therapy (98.8%) than concomitant therapy (95.2%; P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Optimized nonbismuth quadruple hybrid and concomitant therapies cured more than 90% of patients with H pylori infections in areas of high clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01464060.

Standard triple and sequential therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication: an update

H. pylori infection remains a worldwide spread disease with a definite morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, no current therapy regimen is able to cure the infection in all treated patients. The efficacy of the widely recommended triple therapies is decreasing, and a novel 10-day sequential therapy has been proposed. Data of 3 previous meta-analyses showed a significantly higher eradication rate following the sequential as compared to the 7-10 days triple therapies. The sequential therapy achieved significantly better results than triple therapies in children, elderly patients, non-ulcer dyspepsia patients, and in those infected with resistant strains towards either clarithromycin or metronidazole. We identified further 10 randomized trials. By pooling data, H. pylori infection was cured in 2,454 (86%; 95% CI: 84.7-87.3) out of 2,853 patients with the sequential therapy and in 2,320 (75.3%; 95% CI: 73.8-76.9) out of 3,079 patients treated with standard triple therapies (p<0.001), corresponding to a number to treat (NNT) of 9. The comparison between the 10-day sequential regimen and 14-day triple therapies deserves further investigations.

Modified sequential therapy regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Different modified sequential therapies have been proposed for Helicobacter pylori eradication. However, the efficacy of these regimens is controversial.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature and pooled-data analysis to assess: (a) the efficacy of different modified sequential therapies for H. pylori eradication, (b) the eradication rates achieved by these regimens as compared to either standard triple therapies or standard sequential regimen when available.

RESULTS

Overall 21 trials met inclusion criteria. The most used modified sequential therapy was the seven plus seven tetracycline-based regimen which achieved an overall 73.3% eradication rate (6 trials). Such therapy was more effective than the 14-day triple therapy (77.2% vs. 63.6%; 3 trials). The most used five plus five levofloxacin-based sequential therapy achieved a 95.8% and 90% cure rates when 250 mg and 500 mg levofloxacin twice daily were used, respectively. These success rates were higher as compared to that of either standard sequential or triple therapies. Other modified sequential therapies did not achieved acceptably high cure rates. Contradictory results emerged from 2 studies assessing the efficacy of a levofloxacin-based sequential regimen as a second-line therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Both levofloxacin- and tetracycline-based sequential therapies have been proved to be more effective than standard triple therapies, confirming that the 'sequential' administration of drugs is a successful therapeutic procedure for H. pylori infection.

Role of gastritis pattern on Helicobacter pylori eradication

Helicobacter pylori eradication rate following standard triple therapy is decreasing. Identification of predictive factors of therapy success would be useful for H. pylori management in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the role of different gastritis patterns on the efficacy of the currently suggested 14-day triple therapy regimen. One-hundred and seventeen, consecutive, non-ulcer dyspeptic patients, with H. pylori infection diagnosed at endoscopy, were enrolled. All patients received a 14-day, triple therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1 g, all given twice daily. Bacterial eradication was assessed with (13)C-urea breath test 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. H. pylori infection was cured in 70.1% at ITT analysis and 83.7% at PP analysis. The eradication rate tended to be lower in patients with corpus-predominant gastritis as compared to those with antral-predominant gastritis at both ITT (66.1 vs 74.5%) and PP (80.4 vs 87.2%) analyses. The multivariate analysis failed to identify factors associated with therapy success. However, 14-day triple therapy does not achieve acceptable H. pylori cure rate in Italy, and should be not recommended in clinical practice.

Helicobacter pylori: clinical management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Progress continues in our understanding of the role of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastroduodenal as well as extragastric disorders. This review gives an overview on selected areas of the H. pylori infection and their clinical implications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Indications for therapy have been extended and now include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, iron deficiency anemia, and vitamin B12 deficiency. New data are presented on the role of H. pylori in neurodegenerative disorders and in the metabolic syndrome. H. pylori is associated with a (small) increase in the risk for colorectal adenoma and colon cancer. The biggest challenge is the selection of new therapies and treatment strategies because of the increasing failure of standard triple therapies. The best option in high clarithromycin resistance areas is bismuth-based quadruple therapy. Probiotic bacteria and yeasts reduce adverse effects of standard H. pylori eradication regimens. In gastric cancer prevention, screening programs based on the serological detection of preneoplastic conditions may prove useful.

SUMMARY

New algorithms for preventing H. pylori-induced disease and eradicating the organism should be individualized.

Ten-day sequential versus triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a prospective, open-label, randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Increased resistance of Helicobacter pylori to antibiotics has increased the need to develop new first-line treatments for H. pylori. We have prospectively evaluated 10-day sequential versus conventional triple therapy in peptic ulcer patients.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-nine patients with peptic ulcer diseases were prospectively randomized to receive 10 days of lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (conventional triple therapy) or 5 days of lansoprazole and amoxicillin followed by 5 days of lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole (sequential therapy). Post-treatment H. pylori status was determined by the (13) C-urea breath test. Eradication rates, antibiotic resistance rates by agar dilution method, drug compliance, and side-effects were compared.

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat eradication rates were 75.9% (95% CI 66.5-85.3%, 60/79) in the sequential therapy group and 58.7% (95% CI 47.9-69.5%, 47/80) in the conventional triple therapy group (P = 0.01), while the per-protocol eradication rates were 86.8% (95% CI 78.7-94.8%, 59/68) and 67.6% (95% CI 56.5-78.7%, 46/68) (P = 0.01), respectively. Compliance and side-effects were similar in the two groups. Culture of H. pylori showed that 18.2% were resistant to clarithromycin, 41.9% to metronidazole. Dual resistance to both antibiotics was 9.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although 10-day sequential therapy yielded a higher H. pylori eradication rate than 10-day conventional triple therapy, the sequential therapy protocol did not result in a sufficiently satisfactory eradication rate. This might be related to the higher antibiotics resistance rate especially to dual resistance. More effective regimens are needed to overcome antibiotic resistance in Korea.

Helicobacter pylori therapy: Present and future

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of chronic active gastritis, peptic ulcer and gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue-lymphoma, and is also involved in carcinogenesis of the stomach. H. pylori treatment still remains a challenge for physicians, since no current first-line therapy is able to cure the infection in all treated patients. Several factors may help in the eradication of therapy failure. We reviewed both bacterial and host factors involved in therapeutic management of the H. pylori infection. In addition, we evaluated data on the most successful therapy regimens - sequential and concomitant therapies - currently available for H. pylori eradication.

A modified bismuth-containing quadruple therapy including a short course of furazolidone for Helicobacter pylori eradication after sequential therapy failure

BACKGROUND

 Helicobacter pylori eradication has still remained a challenge, especially in case of failure to novel treatments. Therefore, we designed a study to evaluate the effects of a modified bismuth-containing quadruple therapy including a short course of furazolidone on a group of patients whose sequential therapy had been unsuccessful.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Thirty-six H. pylori-positive patients who had previously failed a clarithromycin-containing sequential therapy enrolled the study. They received pantoprazole (40 mg-bid), amoxicillin (1 g-bid), and bismuth subcitrate (240 mg-bid) for 2 weeks and furazolidone (200 mg-bid) just during the first week. Eight weeks after treatment, H. pylori eradication was reassessed using C14-urea breath test.

RESULTS

Thirty five patients completed the study. H. pylori eradication rates were 80.6% (95% CI = 67.6-93.5) and 82.9% (95% CI = 70.6-95.2) according to intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, respectively. All patients had excellent compliance to treatment, and no one interrupted therapy owing to adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

 Regarding the eradication rate (>80%), low price, and very low adverse effects, a 2-week bismuth-containing quadruple regimen including a short course of furazolidone can be an encouraging regimen for second-line H. pylori eradication in case of sequential therapy failure. Possibly, it can be improved by alterations in dose, dosing intervals, and/or duration.

Newer agents for Helicobacter pylori eradication

Helicobacter pylori infection remains widespread internationally, with a definite morbidity and mortality. The efficacy of standard 7–14 day triple therapies is decreasing, mainly due to increasing primary bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Currently, the most effective treatments are either the sequential regimen or the concomitant therapy. Different patents have been registered showing high bactericidal effects in vitro, some of which are active against clarithromycin- and metronidazole-resistant strains, even at low pH values. Among these novel molecules, benzimidazole-derivatives, polycyclic compounds, pyloricidin, and arylthiazole analogues seem to be the more promising. The identification of essential genes for either bacterial colonization or growth represents a route for potential target therapies in the near future.

Low efficacy of clarithromycin including sequential regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Sequential treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) appears to achieve a better eradication rate than triple therapy. However, most of the data have been reported from the Italy, and studies from different population are needed before it is recommended in clinical practice. The present study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of two separate clarithromycin including sequential regimens in Turkey which is well known with high clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance to H. pylori.

METHODS

Consecutive H. pylori -positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomly allocated to one of the two sequential regimens; the first group was given lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. plus amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. for the first week, followed by lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d. for the second week (LA-CM). The second arm was given the same regimen but tetracycline500 g q.i.d. instead of metronidazole (LA-CT). H. pylori was detected with urea breath test (UBT) and histology before enrollment. UBT was repeated at 6th weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients were enrolled in groups and 179 of them completed their protocols. The cumulative per protocol ("PP") and intention-to-treat ("ITT") eradication rates were 74.3% and 66.5% in all patients, respectively. Both "PP" (78.2% vs 70.1%) and "ITT" (72% vs 61%) eradication rates were better in LA-CT group than LA-CM group, but the differences were not statistically significant (p > .05). Both regimens were well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse effects was comparable.

CONCLUSION

Two weeks clarithromycin including sequential regimens with metronidazole or tetracycline were not achieved acceptable eradication rates in Turkey.

Ten-day sequential therapy is more effective than proton pump inhibitor-based therapy in Korea: a prospective, randomized study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The eradication rate of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection has decreased, mainly due to increasing antibiotic resistance, especially against clarithromycin. It has been reported that a 10-day sequential strategy can produce good outcomes. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of sequential therapy as the first-line treatment for the eradication of H. pylori in Korea.

METHODS

A total of 116 patients with proven H. pylori infection received 10-day sequential therapy (20 mg rabeprazole and 1 g amoxicillin, twice daily for the first 5 days, followed by 20 mg rabeprazole, 500 mg clarithromycin, and 500 mg metronidazole, twice daily for the remaining 5 days); 130 patients received 7-day triple therapy (20 mg rabeprazole, 500 mg clarithromycin, and 1 g amoxicillin, twice daily for 7 days). Eradication was evaluated by the (13) C-urea breath test, 4 weeks after the completion of treatment. Compliance and adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

The eradication rates of 10-day sequential therapy and PPI-based triple therapy were 79.3% (92/116) and 63% (82/130) by intention-to-treat analysis, respectively (P = 0.005), and 81.9% (91/111) and 64.5% (82/127) by per protocol analysis, respectively (P = 0.003). Mild adverse events occurred in both therapy groups (27.5% vs 23.8%), but both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The eradication rate of the 10-day sequential therapy regimen was significantly higher than that of PPI-based triple therapy in the Korean population. Ten-day sequential therapy might be effective as a first-line treatment for H. pylori infection in Korea.

Randomised clinical trial: a comparative study of 10-day sequential therapy with 7-day standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in naïve patients

BACKGROUND

The eradication rates following standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection are declining worldwide. Recent studies have shown that sequential therapy for H. pylori infection yields high cure rates.

AIM

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a sequential regimen as first-line treatment of H. pylori infection with a standard triple regimen.

METHODS

A total of 348 naïve H. pylori-infected patients from six hospitals in Korea were assigned randomly to standard triple or sequential therapy groups. Standard triple therapy consisted of 20 mg of rabeprazole, 1 g of amoxicillin and 500 mg of clarithromycin, twice daily for 7 days. Sequential therapy consisted of a 5-day dual therapy (20 mg of rabeprazole and 1 g of amoxicillin, twice daily) followed by a 5-day triple therapy (20 mg of rabeprazole, 500 mg of clarithromycin, and 500 mg of metronidazole, twice daily).

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) eradication rates were 62.2% (95% CI 54.8-69.6%) and 76.0% (95% CI 68.5-83.5%) in the standard triple group, and 77.8% (95% CI 71.4-84.2%) and 87.9% (95% CI 82.3-93.5%) in the sequential group, respectively. The eradication rate was significantly higher in the sequential group compared with the standard triple group in both the ITT and PP populations (P = 0.002 and P = 0.013 respectively), whereas the incidence of adverse events was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Ten-day sequential therapy is more effective and equally tolerated for eradication of H. pylori infection compared with standard triple therapy. Sequential therapy may have a role as first-line treatment for H. pylori infection.

Modified Sequential Therapy Regimen versus Conventional Triple Therapy for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication in Duodenal Ulcer Patients in China: A Multicenter Clinical Comparative Study

Objective. Antimicrobial resistance has decreased eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori infection worldwide. To observe the effect of eradicating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and the treatment of duodenal ulcer by 2 kinds of modified sequential therapy through comparing with that of 10-day standard triple therapy. Methods. A total of 210 patients who were confirmed in duodenal ulcer active or heal period by gastroscopy and H. pylori positive confirmed by rapid urease test, serum anti-H. pylori antibody (ELASE), or histological examination enrolled in the study. All the patients were randomly divided into three groups: group A (70 cases) and group B (70 cases) were provided 10-day modified sequential therapy; group C (70 cases) was provided 10-day standard triple therapy. Patients of group A received 20 mg of Esomeprazole, 500 mg of Clarithromycin for the first 5 days, followed by 20 mg of Esomeprazole, 500 mg of Clarithromycin, and 1000 mg of Amoxicillin for the remaining 5 days. Group B received 20 mg of Esomeprazole, 1000 mg of Amoxicillin for the first 5 days, followed by 20 mg of Esomeprazole, 500 mg of Clarithromycin, and 1000 mg of Amoxicillin for the remaining 5 days. Group C received 20 mg of Esomeprazole, 500 mg of Clarithromycin, and 1000 mg of Amoxicillin for standard 10-day therapy. All drugs were given twice daily. H. pylori eradication rate was checked four to eight weeks after taking the medicine by using a ¹³C urea breath test. In the first, second, third, seventh, twenty-first, thirty-fifth days respectively, the symptoms of patients such as epigastric gnawing, burning pain, and acidity were evaluated simultaneously. Results. Overall, 210 patients accomplished all therapy schemes, 9 case patients were excluded. The examination result indicated that the H. pylori eradication rate of each group was as follows: group A 92.5% (62/67), group B 86.8% (59/68), and group C 78.8% (52/66). The H. pylori eradication rate of group A was slightly higher than group B (P < 0.05) and both of them were obviously higher than group C (P < 0.05). Modified sequential therapy was significantly more effective in patients with clarithromycin-resistant strains (80%/67% versus 31%; P = 0.02). Symptoms improvement: all the three groups could improve the symptoms such as epigastric gnawing, burning pain, and acidity since the first day. There was no significant difference in total score descending of symptoms between each group (P > 0.05). Conclusions. All the three therapy schemes could alleviate symptoms of duodenal ulcer patients in China efficiently. But as far as eradicating H. pylori is concerned, the modified sequential therapy was better than standard triple therapy, especially the therapy scheme used in group A.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The article will give an overview on reasons for treatment failure and tries to show new concepts for Helicobacter pylori treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several new treatment options or modifications of already established regimens have been introduced to overcome treatment failure. Antibiotic resistance to H. pylori is the key factor for treatment failure. At the moment, standard triple therapy remains the primary choice in regions with proven low clarithromycin resistance rates. In areas with high clarithromycin resistance, four drug treatment regimens, including quadruple and sequential therapy, have proven the best results as first-line regimens. The options for second-line treatment regimens are manifold. Second-line treatment regimens need to be adapted accurately to local resistance rates.

SUMMARY

Treatment of H. pylori infection is challenged by a dramatic fall in eradication rates all over the world. Newer regimens have been introduced including sequential, quadruple therapies and those regimens provide promising results, but the knowledge about local resistance rates remains the key to an effective therapy.